Author name: Common Defense

News

B-21 Raiders Set to Roll onto Ellsworth Air Force Base Ramp in 2027

The Air Force’s next generation B-21 Raider program is moving toward a major milestone, with the service expecting the first operational stealth bombers to arrive at Ellsworth Air Force Base in South Dakota in 2027.

Gen. Dale White, director of Critical Major Weapon Systems, said Wednesday that the bombers are on pace to be “on the ramp” at Ellsworth next year, keeping the program aligned with the delivery timeline previously projected in February.

White made the remarks during a keynote address at Life Cycle Industry Days in Dayton, Ohio, an event hosted by the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center.

The update matters because the B-21 is not just another aircraft program drifting through the usual Washington swamp of delays, excuses, and contractor finger pointing.

It is intended to become the backbone of America’s long range strike force for decades.

White, who also serves as direct reporting portfolio manager to the deputy War Secretary, manages major weapons programs including the F 47 and B-21 efforts.

He described the Raider program as “the physical proof our warfighting-focused acquisition mindset can and will work,” a pointed message at a time when the country needs lethality delivered on time, not another glossy PowerPoint from the bureaucracy.

The B-21 is currently in initial production, and the program has increased production capacity by 25%.

That boost is expected to accelerate delivery of the stealth bomber to operational units and give commanders a faster path to a critical combat capability.

Northrop Grumman is building the Raider under a 2024 contract award with the Air Force. The program also received $4.5 billion in already authorized funding through a reconciliation bill signed in fiscal 2025 as the “One Big Beautiful Bill,” part of the Pentagon’s fiscal 2026 war budget.

Second B-21 Raider Completes First Flight, Signaling Major Step in Air Force Modernization
A second B-21 Raider test aircraft takes off Thursday from Palmdale, California, to join the Air Force’s flight test campaign at Edwards Air Force Base. The Air Force hopes having two B-21s at Edwards will allow it to expand testing into weapons integration and critical mission systems checks. (Air Force)

For fiscal 2027, the historic $1.5 trillion budget request proposes $6.1 billion for the B-21 program. That number signals that Washington, at least on this front, understands that deterrence does not come cheap and weakness is far more expensive.

The first next generation stealth bomber began flight testing in 2023 at Edwards Air Force Base in California.

A second aircraft followed in 2025 as the Air Force moved into the complicated work of integrating weapons and mission systems into the platform.

Those steps are essential because the Raider is expected to penetrate advanced enemy air defenses and strike high value targets across vast distances. In plain English, it is being built for the kind of fights America cannot afford to lose.

B-21 Raider Completes Close-Proximity Flight with KC-135 Tanker, Air Force Confirms
A second B-21 Raider joins flight testing at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., Sept. 11, 2025. (Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs)

The production plan calls for a gradual increase, eventually reaching a rate of about seven aircraft per year. The Air Force wants at least 100 B-21 bombers to replace the aging B-1B Lancer and B-2 Spirit fleets over the coming decades.

“This is what disciplined acquisition delivers,” White said in a February release announcing the expanded production capacity.

“This decision reflects our confidence in the program’s performance and the stability of the industrial base. By increasing production capacity now, we are responsibly accelerating delivery of a critical, combat-effective capability to the warfighter.”

That is the kind of language the American people should expect from the Department of War under leaders focused on readiness, deterrence, and victory.

Under President Trump and War Secretary Pete Hegseth, the priority is simple enough for even the Beltway class to understand: build what the warfighter needs, build it fast, and stop apologizing for American strength.

Pentagon Urged to Arm Air Force With 500 Sixth-Generation Fighters and Bombers to Counter China
The Air Force needs to buy at least 200 B-21 Raider stealth bombers, the Mitchell Institute argued in a new paper. (Kyle Brasier/U.S. Air Force)

Ellsworth is set to become the first main operating base for the Raider, putting South Dakota at the center of the future bomber force. For the airmen preparing to receive the aircraft, the 2027 arrival will mark the beginning of a new chapter in strategic aviation.

The B-21’s arrival will also send a message well beyond the ramp at Ellsworth. America is preparing for a dangerous world with serious weapons, serious funding, and a renewed focus on combat power.

There will always be critics who sneer at military modernization while adversaries race to build missiles, ships, drones, and nuclear forces.

Fortunately, the Raider program appears to be doing what too many government programs fail to do: move forward, increase capacity, and put capability into the hands of the warfighter.

If the current timeline holds, the sight of B-21 Raiders at Ellsworth in 2027 will be more than a procurement milestone.

It will be a reminder that peace through strength still requires strength, and America’s bomber force is getting ready for the next era.

News

Average VA Disability Payments Surged Nearly 40% Over 14 Years, Study Finds

Average annual disability compensation paid by the Department of Veterans Affairs has climbed sharply since 2010, even as the overall number of living American veterans has fallen, according to a new study that puts hard numbers behind a major shift in federal veterans benefits.

The analysis found that average yearly VA disability payments rose nearly 40% over 14 years, increasing from $17,286 in 2010 to $24,057 in 2024.

Researchers at the VA Palo Alto Health Care System and Stanford University School of Medicine reviewed VA disability compensation and Social Security Disability Insurance payments to veterans across that period.

They also found that the share of U.S. veterans receiving VA disability compensation more than doubled, rising from 9% in 2010 to 22% in 2024.

That is a major change in the veterans benefits landscape, especially at a time when Washington loves to pretend money moves by magic until taxpayers ask for receipts.

The study points to several likely reasons for the increase, including the heavy deployment tempo faced by post 9/11 veterans and the higher chance of serious service connected illnesses and injuries tied to those wars.

Researchers also noted that improved battlefield medicine and trauma care helped more troops survive severe combat wounds in Iraq and Afghanistan.

At the same time, VA policy changes expanded eligibility and made it easier for more veterans to receive benefits, a reality that has reshaped the system in both cost and reach.

Lawmakers to Unveil FY2026 Budget for Veterans Affairs, Military Construction

While VA disability payments moved upward, Social Security Disability Insurance payments to veterans remained comparatively steady over the same span.

The study found that annual SSDI payments averaged around $19,550, and veterans can qualify for those payments when a medical condition limits their ability to work.

The findings were published Thursday in JAMA Network Open and also highlighted differences in which veterans were more likely to receive each type of disability support.

College educated, married, and younger veterans were more likely to receive VA compensation, while older veterans with disabilities not tied to military service were more likely to receive SSDI.

The authors suggested that the VA claims process itself may influence who gets benefits and who does not.

They described the process as involving “administrative hurdles,” and said those challenges, combined with the pull of VA education benefits, may favor veterans who are better equipped to navigate the bureaucracy.

That is not exactly a shock to anyone who has ever dealt with federal paperwork, where patience, persistence, and a tolerance for alphabet soup can matter almost as much as the underlying claim.

Still, the numbers raise important questions for policymakers, veterans advocates, and officials responsible for keeping the system both fair and sustainable.

The growth in VA disability payments comes as the total U.S. veteran population has dropped substantially.

In 2010, the United States had about 22 million veterans, but by 2024 that figure had fallen to 15.8 million.

Veterans Win as VA Pulls Back on Debated Disability Rating Rule Amid Backlash
Department of Veterans Affairs Secretary Doug Collins speaks with VA Central Iowa Health Care System Director Lisa Curnes at the Des Moines VA Medical Center in Des Moines, Iowa, on Sept. 8, 2025. Collins visited the Vet Center and Des Moines VA Medical Center to meet with staff, engage with Veterans, and toured the facility as part of his commitment to improving Veteran healthcare and benefits across the country. He also recognized staff for their dedication and service. (Veterans Affairs photo by Sam Hircock)

So the country has fewer veterans overall, but a much larger share of them are receiving VA disability compensation, and the average payment has increased significantly.

That combination is certain to fuel future debates over program structure, eligibility, claims processing, and the long term cost of caring for men and women who served.

The researchers described their work as “descriptive” and stopped short of drawing sweeping conclusions.

“These findings can inform policy discussions about optimal fiscal payments and program structures needed to achieve and streamline federal programmatic goals, while underscoring the need to reduce growing disability burden among veterans and to ensure ease of benefits navigation,” they wrote.

The authors did not respond to a request for an interview before publication, according to the report.

Their silence leaves the data to speak for itself, and the data shows a benefits system that has grown more expensive, more widely used, and more central to the lives of American veterans.

For a nation that sent troops into two long wars after 9/11, the rising disability burden is not some abstract budget line.

It is part of the bill that comes due after years of combat deployments, traumatic injuries, toxic exposures, and a federal system that often manages to be both essential and maddening at the same time.

The policy challenge now is straightforward, even if Washington will no doubt find a way to make it complicated.

Veterans with legitimate service connected conditions should get the support they earned, while the system must be simple enough to navigate and disciplined enough to protect public trust.

News

Coast Guard Drops Hammer on $2.8 Million Marijuana Haul Near Bahamas

The U.S. Coast Guard and Bahamian forces pulled off another serious maritime interdiction Saturday, seizing roughly 2,380 pounds of suspected marijuana near Great Inagua, Bahamas.

The haul, valued at about $2.8 million, was found aboard a suspected trafficking vessel operating about 80 miles southwest of Great Inagua.

For smugglers hoping the open water would give them cover, that plan aged about as well as most criminal genius schemes do.

The crew of the U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Charles Sexton worked alongside the Royal Bahamas Defence Force to board the vessel and inspect what was moving through the area. Once aboard, authorities discovered 97 bales of suspected marijuana.

Three people who were on the vessel were taken into custody and transferred to the Royal Bahamas Defence Force for prosecution.

The suspected narcotics were also turned over to Bahamian authorities as part of the case.

After Chase, US Navy and Coast Guard Intercept 1,296 lbs of Cocaine
U.S. Coast Guard Law Enforcement Detachment 105 seized 12 bales of cocaine from a drug smuggling vessel on Aug 11, 2025, in the Eastern Pacific. (MCS2 Sheryssa DoWard/Navy)

“This interdiction highlights the strength of our partnership and our shared commitment to combating transnational organized crime in the region,” Lt. Peter Fager, commanding officer of the Charles Sexton, said in a statement.

“Working together, we continue to disrupt illicit trafficking and protect the security and stability of our maritime borders.”

That partnership matters because the waters around the Bahamas remain a prime route for smugglers trying to move drugs through the region and closer to American communities.

The Caribbean may look calm on a postcard, but for Coast Guard crews, it is a constant operational environment where bad actors test the seams every day.

The operation was carried out in coordination with the Bahamian government and the U.S. Coast Guard Homeland Security Cutter Ocean effort.

That initiative is built around using commercially operated vessels to support Coast Guard cutters while they remain deployed at sea.

Coast Guard Crew Pulls Off Daring Rescue After Roof Collapse Traps Workers in Hardening Concrete

The idea is straightforward and practical, which is probably why it makes so much sense.

Instead of pulling cutters off station and sending them back to port for supplies, the program helps deliver personnel, fuel and other support directly to crews while they continue the mission.

That kind of sustainment can make a major difference for maritime security, especially as Coast Guard crews are asked to cover enormous operating areas with limited time and resources. When a cutter can stay out longer, smugglers have fewer openings to exploit.

“As demands on the Coast Guard continue to grow, we must find innovative ways to sustain our fleet and keep our crews focused on the mission,” Vice Adm. Nate Moore, deputy commandant for operations, said in a statement.

“Homeland Security Cutter-Ocean will help us deliver critical supplies and personnel more efficiently while increasing the endurance and effectiveness of our operational forces.”

Coast Guard Helicopter Crashes During Training Mission in Alaska, All Crew Survive
A U.S. Coast Guard MH-60T Jayhawk out of USCG Air Station Sitka conducts flight operations in support of exercises during SAREX 2026, April 16, 2026. (Alejandro Peña/Alaska National Guard)

Moore’s point is hard to miss. Readiness is not some Pentagon talking point cooked up for a slideshow, it is what decides whether a crew is in the right place at the right time when a drug boat tries to slip through.

The Charles Sexton seizure is also a reminder that counter narcotics work is not abstract policy theater.

Every bale taken off the water is money denied to criminal networks, and every interdiction forces traffickers to absorb another costly failure.

Transnational organized crime groups rely on maritime routes because they believe distance, weather, and jurisdictional boundaries can work in their favor.

But coordinated operations between the Coast Guard and partner nations continue to make that math more painful for them.

Coast Guard Readiness Erodes as Shutdown Persists, Officials Warn
The partial government shutdown is affecting civilian employees, recruiting, maintenance and non-emergency operations. (Petty Officer 2nd Class Matthew Thieme/U.S. Coast Guard)

The Royal Bahamas Defence Force plays a critical role in these missions because regional cooperation closes the gaps that smugglers love to exploit.

When American and Bahamian forces operate together, the message is simple enough for even traffickers to understand: the water is being watched.

For the Coast Guard, missions like this sit at the intersection of homeland security, border protection, and national security.

The same crews that handle rescues, patrols, and maritime law enforcement are also standing between criminal networks and the routes they use to push drugs north.

The seizure near Great Inagua will not end the drug trade by itself, of course.

But it does show that aggressive maritime enforcement, backed by smart logistics and strong partnerships, can keep pressure on the networks that profit from chaos.

And for the crew of the Charles Sexton, the result was clear: 97 bales of suspected marijuana removed from the pipeline, three suspects handed over for prosecution, and another reminder that America’s maritime front line is very real.

News

War Department Launches Sweeping Review of U.S. Force Posture in Europe

The War Department has formally opened its review of America’s military footprint in Europe, launching a process that could shape the future of U.S. troop presence, basing, and force posture across the continent.

The review was first announced last month by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth during the NATO ministerial in Brussels, where he described the effort as “a real review” of how America stations and supports forces in Europe.

Under Secretary of War for Policy Elbridge Colby said Tuesday on X that the War Department had “kicked off” the review, confirming that the effort is now underway inside the department.

At this stage, the War Department has not announced any troop cuts, unit relocations, or base closures as part of the process.

That matters, because the usual Washington rumor mill tends to sprint straight from review to panic before anyone has read a single recommendation.

The department has also not provided a date for when the review’s findings will be released, though Hegseth has said the work is expected to take up to six months, while adding it “could be less.”

The review comes as President Trump’s administration continues pressing European allies to shoulder more of the conventional military burden inside NATO.

That message has been clear for years, even if some European capitals preferred to pretend American taxpayers would keep writing blank checks forever.

Hegseth has framed the review as part of a serious reassessment of U.S. posture worldwide, not simply a Europe only exercise.

Pentagon Taps Lt. Gen. Kevin Admiral to Command US Army Europe and Africa
The Pentagon nominated Lt. Gen. Kevin Admiral to replace Gen. Christopher Donahue as the top Army officer for Europe and Africa. Admiral is currently the commanding general of III Armored Corps and Fort Hood, Texas. Army photo by Sgt. Tanner Dibble.

The process will include input from U.S. European Command, consultations with Congress, and discussions with allies, according to the department.

Colby said the review is meant to ensure NATO is “moving fast and irreversibly toward Europe taking primary responsibility for its conventional defense.”

That phrase is doing a lot of work, because it signals that Washington expects Europe to become the lead actor in protecting Europe, while the United States focuses on broader strategic realities.

Colby also said the expected outcome is meant to accelerate NATO’s transition into “a stronger, more equitable, and sustainable alliance.”

In plain English, that means allies who have long enjoyed the American security umbrella are being told to bring more than speeches, conferences, and boutique capabilities to the table.

Trump Reviews Troop Levels in Europe as Germany Footprint Remains a Cornerstone
U.S. Soldiers assigned to 1st Squadron, 2nd Cavalry Regiment (1/2CR) exchange patches with German soldiers during a Schuetzenschnur (German weapons proficiency test) event with the German partner unit of 1/2CR, the Panzergrenadierbataillon 112, at Regen, Germany, Sept. 29, 2022. 1/2CR provided an opportunity for exemplary Soldiers to earn a foreign award and to build camaraderie with German Army counterparts in order to strengthen NATO and multinational partnerships. (U.S. Army photo by Markus Rauchenberger)

The War Department said the review will examine whether current U.S. posture in Europe aligns with the 2025 National Security Strategy and the administration’s 2026 military planning priorities.

Colby said the department will build a range of options using “strategic rigor, a strong empirical baseline, and a clear sense of the geopolitical and military realities.”

That approach suggests the administration wants data, force requirements, basing realities, and threat assessments driving the decision, not sentimental attachment to Cold War arrangements.

For troops and families stationed in Europe, the review does not immediately mean orders are changing or installations are being reshuffled.

Still, a formal force posture review is not meaningless paperwork, because these studies often inform major decisions about where America puts combat power, logistics support, headquarters staff, air assets, and rotational units.

U.S. Postpones Weapons Deliveries to European Partners Amid Iran Conflict
U.S. Patriot missile batteries stand ready in Poland, April 2022. (Sgt. 1st Class Christopher Smith/U.S. Army)

The review also lands at a time when NATO is still wrestling with Russia’s war in Ukraine, persistent instability along Europe’s eastern flank, and the challenge of keeping alliance deterrence credible.

At the same time, the United States is balancing growing concerns in the Indo Pacific, threats from Iran and its proxies, border security demands, and the need to rebuild readiness after years of political distractions.

Colby said he looks forward to working closely with Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe, as the review moves forward.

He also said the War Department will conduct “extensive consultations” with European allies, Congress, and other parts of the U.S. government throughout the process.

That consultation piece is important, because any shift in U.S. posture in Europe will draw intense attention from lawmakers, host nations, military families, and commanders responsible for readiness.

U.S. Army Warns Future European Battle Could Demand 1,500 Targets a Day
U.S. soldiers load an M119A3 Howitzer during a live-fire exercise as part of Dynamic Front 26 at the Grafenwoehr Training Area, Feb. 9, 2026. (Kevin Sterling Payne/U.S. Army)

But consultation is not the same thing as surrendering the decision to Brussels, Berlin, or the permanent bureaucracy that always finds a reason to preserve the status quo.

The Trump administration’s broader argument is simple: NATO can remain strong only if it becomes fairer, more balanced, and less dependent on the United States carrying the conventional load.

For Hegseth and Colby, the review appears designed to translate that argument into actual posture options, not just another communique full of polished diplomatic fog.

No final recommendations have been announced, and no immediate changes have been ordered.

But the War Department’s Europe review is now officially in motion, and allies across the Atlantic should understand the message: the era of automatic American overextension is getting a hard, serious look.

News

Ukraine’s F-16s are Being Ground Down by Russia’s Relentless Drone Swarms

Ukraine’s small fleet of F-16 fighters has become one of the most important shields against Russia’s relentless drone attacks, but that success is coming at a serious cost.

The jets are killing drones by the thousands, while also burning through flying hours, maintenance life, and precious missiles that Kyiv cannot easily replace.

Airpower analyst Justin Bronk, writing for the Royal United Services Institute in Britain, said Ukrainian F 16s have destroyed more than 2,500 Geran and Gerbera one way attack drones.

That is an impressive tally, but it also shows the math problem Ukraine now faces because Russia is feeding the fight with industrial scale drone production.

“[The] use of fighters against such drones has consumed an unsustainable number of airframe flying hours and air-to-air missiles … since mid-2024, when the Ukrainian Air Force received its first Western aircraft and trained crews,” the analysis reads.

Bronk added, “Russian industry produces more than 6,000 [one-way attack] drones per month, and fighter aircraft have only a finite number of airframe hours available before they need time consuming deep maintenance cycles to be performed at a factory by expert technicians.”

That is the brutal reality of modern air warfare. A high end fighter can shoot down cheap drones all day, but if the enemy can build thousands more every month, the expensive aircraft eventually starts losing the endurance race.

Ukraine reportedly has about 39 F-16s in service out of roughly 79 pledged by Western European countries.

It also operates a small number of Mirage 2000 5 fighters promised by France, along with older Soviet era Su-27 and MiG-29 aircraft.

The F-16 has still changed the air war in important ways.

It allows Ukraine to launch stand off strikes with American JDAM bombs and French AASM Hammer glide bombs, and an F-16 reportedly shot down a Russian Su-35 over eastern Ukraine earlier this month.

Putin Agrees to Ceasefire on Energy and Infrastructure Targets in Ukraine

But the same aircraft that gave Ukraine new reach is now being pulled into the drone grind.

“The F-16 fleet has been over-tasked, mostly by C-UAS [counter-drone] interception duties, for which there is almost unlimited demand over time,” Bronk said.

Ukraine is under pressure from several directions at once. Russia is not only launching drones, but also combining them with cruise missiles such as the Kh-101 and ballistic missiles such as the Iskander M and Kinzhal.

Kyiv has responded by building dense belts of short range air defenses along the front and around key cities. Those defenses include short range missiles, anti aircraft guns, machine gun teams, mobile crews, and locally built interceptor drones.

U.S. Sends Retired F-16s from 'Boneyard' to Ukraine for Spare Parts

“What unites all these mobile air defense teams and counter-drone teams is that their equipment and ammunition is relatively cheap and thus their operations are sustainable,” the RUSI analysis noted.

“However, they are relatively personnel intensive to deploy at scale and require both force density and geographical depth to be effective.”

That creates another hard lesson for NATO planners, especially the ones who spent years pretending cheap threats could be handled by PowerPoint doctrine and procurement committees. Ukraine’s model works because it is dense, manpower heavy, and constantly adapted under fire.

“NATO cannot replicate the density of SHORAD defenses that Ukraine deploys for C-UAS coverage, due to the huge personnel requirements of doing so on a sustainable basis,” Bronk said.

The better answer may be layered protection for the most important sites, including airfields, command posts, and logistics hubs.

U.S. Sends Retired F-16s from 'Boneyard' to Ukraine for Spare Parts

Radar guided guns and cheaper aircraft launched drone killers such as APKWS II rockets could help reduce the burden on manned fighters.

Still, short range air defense does not solve the cruise missile and ballistic missile problem.

Ukraine must husband high end interceptors such as Patriot and SAMP T missiles the way Israel and the United States must manage limited interceptor stocks during heavy missile exchanges.

That is why Bronk argues Ukraine should stop using F-16s as much as possible against disposable drones and reserve them for missions that require their speed, sensors, and weapons.

“Other systems need to be used wherever possible for [one-way attack] drones so that F-16 capacity can be used to intercept cruise missiles and deliver strike missions,” he said.

Trump Takes Bold Stand Moving Up 50-Day Deadline for Russia to End Ukraine War

“Within the Ukrainian Air Force inventory, it is by far the most efficient asset for this.”

Bronk also believes Ukraine’s air force could produce stronger results if commanders closer to the fight had more freedom to plan missions.

“There is potential for the Ukrainian Air Force to have greater effects if squadrons and wings are given more authority to plan strikes themselves rather than being centrally tasked by Army-centric headquarters elements,” he said.

The lesson is plain enough for the Pentagon crowd and every NATO capital still waking up to the drone age.

Expensive aircraft remain indispensable, but using them as the first answer to every cheap drone swarm is a fast way to wear down the very force needed for the hardest missions.

News

Navy Unleashes GARC Uncrewed Vessel in Historic Live Fire Drill [WATCH]

The U.S. Navy is pushing its unmanned surface fleet out of the PowerPoint stage and into the business end of naval warfare, which is exactly where this technology belongs.

Just over two weeks after U.S. Central Command used three Corsair unmanned surface vessels to strike a submarine and ship maintenance facility at Iran’s Bandar Abbas naval base, the Navy has confirmed another major step forward.

That Iran operation marked the “first time American forces have employed sea drones in combat operations,” and now the fleet is proving the concept in live fire training.

The latest milestone came during a live sinking exercise off Hawaii, where two former U.S. warships were sent to the bottom during the biennial Rim of the Pacific exercise.

The amphibious assault ship USS Peleliu and the cruiser USS Mobile Bay both became targets in a training event designed to sharpen real world combat capability.

On July 24, the Navy released footage showing the sinking, including video of the Global Autonomous Reconnaissance Craft, known as GARC, targeting the hulk of the former USS Peleliu.

For a service trying to move faster on autonomous systems, the image was not subtle.

Sarah Weinstein, a surface warfare officer serving as the first commanding officer of Unmanned Surface Vessel Division 32, said her unit executed the Navy’s first GARC live fire. Her division, USVDIV 32, was behind the operation.

“It was incredible to watch my team execute with precision and we were thrilled to provide a perspective of the former USS Peleliu that often isn’t often captured in a SINKEX,” Weinstein wrote on LinkedIn.

The sinking took place on July 17, with the GARC playing a central role in the Peleliu SINKEX.

That matters because these exercises are not ceremonial fireworks shows, no matter how badly the soft handed crowd in Washington sometimes treats military innovation like a tech demo.

The GARC is built by BlackSea Technologies, a Baltimore based company that calls the craft the “most proven tactical sUSV on the water.”

The small vessel is designed to give commanders a flexible tool for reconnaissance, targeting, escort missions, and maritime awareness.

The 16 foot craft can carry a payload of up to 1,000 pounds and travel 700 nautical miles at 22 knots, according to the company.

BlackSea says the GARC “combines modular payload flexibility, advanced autonomy, and rugged endurance.”

That combination is why the Navy is taking the platform seriously.

A small, fast, uncrewed surface vessel that can scout, watch, track, and potentially help strike targets gives commanders more options without immediately putting sailors in harm’s way.

Operators can control the vessels one at a time or manage them as a swarm. They can also be driven manually or assigned a target to follow using radar, giving the fleet a scalable tool for contested waters where seconds and signatures matter.

In August 2025, the Navy said it was “experimenting with the Global Autonomous Reconnaissance Craft (GARC)” to support naval operations. Last month, USVDIV 32 also used the drone boats during Exercise BALTOPS 2026, one of NATO’s major maritime exercises.

“We are at the beginning and we don’t even know where we’re going to take it yet,” Weinstein told The Wall Street Journal in June.

“The GARC originally was designed to kind of do a limited skill set, and we’ve turned it into something that can do escort, that can do surveillance, intelligence, maritime domain awareness, and we’ve already with one platform been able to expand what is in the realm of possible.”

That is the key point. The Navy is not merely testing a gadget, it is expanding the menu of what sea control may look like in a future fight.

China is building ships at a pace that should wake up anyone still hitting the snooze button, and Iran has already learned that unmanned systems can reach into places adversaries would rather keep comfortable.

If the Navy can field cheap, rugged, and expendable platforms alongside crewed warships, the math of maritime power begins to change.

The GARC’s role in sinking the former USS Peleliu is another testing milestone on the road toward operational deployment.

The sooner the fleet turns promising systems into combat ready tools, the better positioned America will be when deterrence stops being a slogan and starts being measured in steel, sensors, and firepower.

WATCH MORE ABOUT GARC BELOW:

News

U.S. Troops in the Mideast Could Be Forced to Surrender Cell Phones as Iran Hunts for Targeting Clues

The top U.S. commander for the Middle East has warned American troops that the videos and images they post online could hand Iran a dangerous battlefield advantage, and some deployed personnel may soon be told to give up their cell phones entirely.

Adm. Brad Cooper, head of U.S. Central Command, issued the warning in a July 28 letter obtained by Reuters, telling forces that careless posts can help Tehran determine whether its strikes are working.

“The direct, unavoidable cost of this open-source intelligence could be measured in the lives of American service members and civilian residents in targeted Gulf countries,” Cooper wrote.

His message was blunt, and frankly long overdue in an age when every bored private with a phone can accidentally become a free intelligence asset for the enemy.

Cooper urged troops to “redouble our focus on operational security,” though his memo did not order a specific region wide phone ban.

Still, two sources familiar with the matter told Reuters that troops in Jordan, a frequent target of Iranian strikes, have been told their phones will be confiscated in the coming days.

A third source said phone seizures are under consideration elsewhere in the region because of operational security concerns, though that person did not describe the move as certain.

Military Responds with More Suspensions Over Service Members’ Social Media Activity After Charlie Kirk Shooting
A recent Air Forces Central Command and 380th Air Expeditionary Wing policy prohibits all personnel from bringing portable electronic devices (PED) into most work centers on the installation. A PED is any electronic device that would have the capability to record audio, video, save notes or has wireless communication ability. PED’s can pose a threat to cyber security by allowing sensitive or classified information to be transferred illegally and allow adversaries to collect electronic signals emitted by classified systems. Examples of PEDs include, but are not limited to, BlackBerrys, cell phones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), laptops, MP3 players, iPods, iPads, digital photo frames, non-government USB devices/external hard drives, computer tablets, and GPS watches. (U.S. Air Force photo by Tech Sgt. Christina M. Styer/Released)

U.S. Central Command spokesperson Captain Timothy Hawkins downplayed the memo as part of a broader push to tighten battlefield discipline.

“The message is a general reminder to our service members on the importance of maintaining operational security. This is one of many opportunities Admiral Cooper has used to convey operational priorities,” Hawkins said.

The issue is not theoretical. In a video posted online this month, a U.S. service member recorded troops running for shelter during a deadly Iranian attack on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan on July 17.

Cooper appeared to reference that incident directly, saying the video had been recorded using Meta smart glasses with a built in camera.

“Video captured from a service member’s Meta glasses was posted on Instagram showing where and how the individual had evacuated to a bunker during an Iranian missile and drone attack,” Cooper wrote.

That kind of footage may look like a quick update for friends or followers, but on a modern battlefield it can become a targeting packet.

Iran, Cooper warned, often cannot easily assess whether its missiles and drones hit anything useful because American forces use electronic jamming and other battlefield tactics to deny the enemy clean information.

“Iran knows the weapons were fired; however, their forces do not know if they missed by 50 meters, hit an empty tarmac, or successfully struck a crowded facility,” he wrote.

Former Army Sergeant Pleads Guilty to Attempting to Sell U.S. Military Secrets to China
Cyber-warfare specialists serving with the 175th Cyberspace Operations Group of the Maryland Air National Guard engage in weekend training at Warfield Air National Guard Base, Middle River, Md., Jun. 3, 2017. (U.S. Air Force photo by J.M. Eddins Jr.)

“Detailed lists, descriptions, and analyses of what was hit, openly published by news outlets are essentially performing Iran’s Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) for them, free of charge,” Cooper said.

That is the ugly reality of war in the smartphone age. Tehran fires, waits, then scrapes the internet while Americans online do the regime’s homework.

The conflict with Iran began on Feb. 28, and Reuters reported that 18 U.S. troops have been killed while more than 600 have been wounded.

Those casualties have fed public concern about the war, with only about one in three Americans supporting it, according to the report.

Democratic lawmakers have demanded more information about the conflict, including damage to U.S. infrastructure at bases, such as radar towers, barracks and aircraft hangars.

They have also called for release of a U.S. military investigation into a likely U.S. strike on a girls’ school in Iran on the opening day of the war, which Reuters first reported.

Phone rules already vary widely across the military. Some troops must lock away devices, and special operations forces can face outright bans during sensitive missions.

But broader confiscation would hit families hard because many deployed service members use their phones to reassure spouses, parents and children that they are still alive.

Two sources told Reuters that the possibility has already caused anxiety among family members who have spent months reading Iranian claims about deadly attacks on bases across the Middle East.

For years, U.S. officials have warned that mobile applications, including fitness apps, can expose location data and help hostile powers track American personnel.

Reuters reported in May that commercially available location data harvested from smartphones and other devices has been used to target or surveil U.S. forces.

At the same time, the Pentagon has tightly controlled information about Iranian attack claims and individual incidents involving wounded troops, citing operational security.

Cooper said the reason is simple. Public details about what was damaged and where can help Iran decide whether to fire again.

“Detailed public disclosures can become an immediate green light for Iranian forces to launch a secondary, much more devastating wave of attacks,” he said.

For troops in the region, the message is clear enough. The phone in a pocket may feel like a lifeline home, but in the wrong moment it can become a beacon for the enemy.

News

Ford, GM Defense and BC Customs Battle for Army’s New Infantry Squad Vehicle

The U.S. Army has officially set up a three way industrial showdown for its next Infantry Squad Vehicle, putting Ford, GM Defense and BC Customs in direct competition to build prototype versions of the future platform.

The service confirmed Tuesday that on June 30 it awarded firm fixed price Other Transaction Agreements to all three manufacturers.

Each company is expected to deliver three Infantry Squad Vehicle Heavy models, known as ISV H, with the first prototypes due by March 30, 2027.

Those six seat vehicles will then head into testing with Army Test and Evaluation Command, where the Army will see which company can actually deliver a tough, mobile, power producing battlefield workhorse instead of another glossy briefing slide.

The Wall Street Journal first reported the awards Monday.

Military Times asked the Army for the dollar amounts attached to the agreements, but the service did not provide the costs. That part, as usual in Pentagon land, remains tucked away from the taxpayers who are footing the bill.

The Army laid out what it wants in an April Commercial Solutions Opening, and the requirements are not modest.

The service is looking for a vehicle that can carry a 4,000 pound payload, tow a 6,500 pound trailer and handle large power demands in the field.

US Military Prepares to Unleash Fleet of Battlefield Laser Trucks
A U.S. Army M1301 Infantry Squad Vehicle equipped with a BlueHalo LOCUST Laser Weapon System, April 2025. (U.S. Army)

The most striking requirement is electrical power. The Army wants the new ISV H to export 60 kW of continuous high voltage DC power, enough to support counter drone systems, electronic warfare tools, directed energy weapons and other modern battlefield equipment.

That kind of power demand says plenty about where ground combat is heading. Infantry units are no longer just asking for transport, because drones, jammers, sensors and lasers are becoming just as central to survival as armor and ammunition.

The Army also wants the vehicle to recharge to 90 percent within six hours. It must do that in miserable operating conditions ranging from 25 degrees below zero to brutal heat reaching 130 degrees, because America’s soldiers do not get to pick comfortable terrain.

The service is also preparing for more autonomous operations. Desired features include architecture already in place for “drive-by-wire,” along with rotating rear seats and “ergonomic mobile workstations,” which is Army speak for troops needing to work, fight and communicate while moving.

The Army also wants rear seating that can be quickly reconfigured without tools to carry a litter for evacuations. That matters, because a vehicle that can move a squad but cannot adapt when troops are wounded is not much help when the shooting starts.

Army Plans ‘Heavy’ Infantry Vehicle To Power The Battlefield Of The Future

The current Infantry Squad Vehicle is built by GM Defense and was designed to rapidly move nine soldiers through terrain where larger military vehicles are risky, slow or simply impractical.

The new heavy version appears aimed at adding more battlefield utility, more power and more flexibility to that basic mobility concept.

The Army’s fiscal 2027 budget request, released in April, calls for buying an initial 34 ISV H vehicles at an estimated cost of $463,000 per truck. The long range goal is to purchase 606 vehicles, which would make this competition a major prize for whichever manufacturer proves it can meet the Army’s requirements.

During a June Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Jess Tolleson, principal deputy assistant secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology, pointed directly to the power problem the Army is trying to solve.

“One of the things that we do have a critical capability gap on right now is power generation at that mobile brigade combat team level,” he said.

GM Defense had not responded to a Military Times inquiry at the time of publication. The company previously said on social media that it was optimizing a Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD truck for the effort.

Ford said Tuesday that its Super Duty trucks are well suited for military applications, though the company did not provide much detail on its proposed specifications. Breaking Defense reported Monday that Ford would be using its F Series pickup truck.

Marines Bolster Indo-Pacific Might With New Anti-Ship and Air Defense Platforms in Okinawa

BC Customs is pitching itself as the more specialized builder in the contest. In a Tuesday call, chief operating officer Dave Baringer said the company was uniquely positioned to create an endlessly modify able, “purpose-driven, ground-up vehicle.”

Baringer also said BC Customs is working with Raglan, which will handle the electronic infrastructure for the prototypes. He declined to discuss the contract timeline or dollar value.

The Army’s demand for a truck that can generate serious power comes as the service pushes to place more directed energy weapons on lighter tactical vehicles. That is not science fiction anymore, no matter how much the usual bureaucracy might try to bury progress under paperwork.

The service has already operationally tested AeroVironment’s 20 kilowatt LOCUST laser on both the Infantry Squad Vehicle and the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle through its Multi Purpose High Energy Laser effort.

Under President Trump and War Secretary Pete Hegseth, the pressure will be on to make sure these programs produce real combat capability, not just expensive prototypes parked for photo opportunities.

For soldiers at the brigade level, the ISV H competition is about more than a new truck. It is about whether the Army can move fast enough to match the drone saturated, power hungry, electronically contested battlefield that America’s enemies are already studying closely.

News

101st Airborne Border Troops to Move Into New 3D Printed Barracks at Fort Bliss

Soldiers from the 101st Airborne Division heading to the southern border are set to become some of the first troops to live in a new generation of 3D printed barracks at Fort Bliss, Texas.

The Army opened the first two buildings this week, giving transient troops a permanent housing option closer to their mission area instead of forcing them into long drives after exhausting border shifts.

The project is part of a $62.8 million contract with the construction firm ICON to build 10 barracks capable of housing 560 troops.

For soldiers rotating through Fort Bliss rather than being permanently assigned there, the new buildings are designed to provide practical, durable housing that is actually built around the realities of field duty.

Army officials said troops from the 101st Airborne Division’s 1st Mobile Brigade “Bastogne” unit out of Fort Campbell, Kentucky, will be among the first to use the new facilities.

Their deployment to the southern border was announced in June, as the military continues supporting border security operations after years of Washington pretending the problem would solve itself.

“In the coming weeks, when the next unit finishes a demanding shift on the border, they won’t have to drive an hour into the desert,” Maj. Gen. Curtis Taylor, commanding general of Fort Bliss, said in the Army release.

“Instead, they will return here, to permanent, energy-resilient, world-class housing just steps away from gyms, dining facilities and recreation areas.”

That may sound basic to civilians, but anyone who has spent time around the military knows quality of life details can make a serious difference for troops doing long, hot, repetitive security missions.

Army Announces Unit Rotations in Europe and the Middle East, Including Return of Soldiers from Lithuania
The 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) and U.S. Army Fort Campbell re-enlists 124 soldiers to continue to serve our country. Stay tuned for more event coverage this week! (Photos by SPC Harris, 101st Division Public Affairs Office)

The new barracks are not luxury condos, of course, but they appear to be a meaningful step up from temporary arrangements that leave soldiers stretched thin after demanding days in the Texas heat.

Fort Bliss Garrison Commander Col. Michael Soyka showed off the new buildings in a video posted to the base’s social media channels.

Inside, the barracks feature two rows of bunk beds in an open bay layout, similar to what many service members remember from basic training, though with several upgrades that matter when soldiers are living there between shifts.

Each top and bottom bunk has its own power outlet, a small but welcome improvement over the old routine of troops having to share one plug with a bunkmate.

Lockers also separate the beds, adding a bit more privacy in an environment where personal space is usually treated like a rumor.

Soyka said the Army also increased the number of washers and dryers after earlier troop rotations made it clear that the older setup did not meet demand.

From Old Abe to the Screaming Eagle: How the 101st Airborne Became a Symbol of Courage
The 101st Airborne Division “screaming eagle” patch is highly recognizable within the U.S. Army. (DVIDS)

That is the kind of soldier feedback that should be acted on quickly, especially when troops are coming back from hot border duty with uniforms and gear that need constant cleaning.

The barracks include standard showers, but they also feature a smaller stall designed for washing off gear.

It is roughly the size of a dog washing station, but for troops working in heat, dust, sweat and field conditions, it is a practical addition rather than a gimmick.

“When you’re out there, you just get hot, you get sweaty,” Soyka said. “We actually added this so that soldiers can be able to wash their gear and be able to get ready for the next day.”

The first two buildings officially opened Tuesday, while Army officials said the printing phase for all 10 structures took just 58 days.

The full project is expected to be finished in the fall, giving Fort Bliss a larger footprint of permanent barracks for rotating units moving through the installation.

101st Airborne Division Tests New Capabilities in Division-Level Air Assault Exercise

This is not Fort Bliss’s first run with 3D printed construction.

In 2025, the base opened three other 3D printed buildings, also built by ICON, to house troops before and after mobilization.

ICON, based in Austin, uses a massive Vulcan printer that weighs five tons and measures 16 feet by 47 feet wide.

The company builds with a concrete based material called lavacrete, which it says is designed to hold up against Texas humidity and temperature swings.

For the Army, the appeal is obvious because the service needs housing that can be built quickly, withstand harsh conditions and support troops without years of construction delays.

For the soldiers, the appeal is even simpler because a shorter commute, reliable laundry, personal outlets and places to clean gear beat the usual government afterthoughts.

The 101st Airborne soldiers heading into these barracks will still be doing hard work on a serious mission.

But at least when they come off shift, they will have a place built for the job instead of another reminder that the people making border policy too often never have to live with the consequences.

News

Coast Guard Icebreaker Healy Towed to Washington After Major Engine Failure

The Coast Guard’s medium icebreaker Healy was towed into Port Angeles, Washington, earlier this month after suffering what the service described as a “significant engineering casualty” during sea trials off the coast.

The Cutter Healy had recently completed drydock repairs at Swan Island shipyard in Portland, Oregon, before losing propulsion on July 13. The Coast Guard said the vessel was brought to port without incident, and no personnel were injured.

That is the good news. The less comforting news is that a key American icebreaker went down just as the Arctic is getting busier, more contested and far less forgiving of bureaucratic delays.

The 420 foot Healy had undergone an $18.3 million overhaul earlier this year. That work included repairs to propulsion related components such as shafts, bearings, seals, rudders and the bow thruster.

Vigor Marine LLC also upgraded the ship’s sonar system and related infrastructure, according to a company release.

Yet after that expensive yard period, the ship still suffered a propulsion failure during sea trials, which is exactly the kind of development that gets attention in a hurry.

The Coast Guard said an investigation into the incident is underway. The service also said Healy is expected to require “major repairs,” though officials have not yet provided the extent of the damage or a timeline for getting the ship back into service.

“[The Coast Guard] will provide additional information regarding the casualty aboard CGC Healy as it becomes available,” the service told Military Times on Wednesday.

Coast Guard Icebreaker Healy Towed to Washington After Major Engine Failure

Coast Guard Commandant Adm. Kevin Lunday credited the crew for its response, saying the sailors acted “with speed and skill in responding to this casualty.” That professionalism matters, especially when a mechanical failure at sea can turn ugly fast.

Lunday also pointed directly to the larger strategic problem facing the country.

“The nation needs a highly capable icebreaking fleet operated by the Coast Guard to ensure year-round access to the region to protect our northern border in Alaska and maritime approaches in the Arctic,” Lunday said in the release.

He is right about that. The Arctic is not some faraway science project for policy seminar chatter, because it is a real operating environment where Russia, China and other competitors are watching every American gap.

In Healy’s absence, the Coast Guard icebreaker Storis is patrolling the Arctic region. Storis is a commercial vessel the service purchased and converted for Coast Guard use last year, a practical move that reflects the urgency of the mission.

The national security Cutter Munro is also operating in the region. Earlier this month, Munro began tracking two Chinese vessels as they moved through the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone and the extended U.S. continental shelf in the Bering Sea, according to service officials.

“Munro’s efforts advanced Operation Frontier Sentinel, which is designed to protect American sovereign rights, ensure consistency with international law, and position the Coast Guard to rapidly respond to any detected malign activity,” a spokesperson said.

The transits marked the first reported incidents in 2026 involving Chinese vessels in the region. That should be enough to remind Washington that the Arctic is not waiting around for acquisition charts, redesign meetings or another round of contractor excuses.

Coast Guard Icebreaker Healy Towed to Washington After Major Engine Failure
Coast Guard Cutter Healy (WAGB 20) observes the Northern Lights streaking across the sky while operating above the Arctic Circle in Baffin Bay, Oct. 3, 2021. Homeported in Seattle, Washington, the Healy’s crew annually deploys to the Arctic to conduct high latitude Coast Guard missions including icebreaking operations and supporting oceanographic research with members embarked from the international science community. U.S. Coast Guard photo by Chief Petty Officer Matt Masaschi.

The Coast Guard has been increasing icebreaker acquisitions in response to rising foreign interest in the Arctic. That push also follows an Oct. 8, 2025, executive order signed by President Donald Trump directing the Department of Homeland Security to increase the number of icebreakers available for Arctic patrols.

That order recognized a plain reality that too many in Washington ignored for years. If America wants to control its approaches, protect Alaska and maintain presence in icy waters, it needs ships that can actually get there and stay there.

Bollinger Shipyards is building the first of three polar security cutters, but that program has been hit by repeated delays. Contractor changes, engineering problems and design alterations have helped push the first delivery to 2033, according to the Government Accountability Office.

That is nearly a decade later than the original target date. In a world where China is showing up in the Bering Sea and Russia is heavily invested in Arctic operations, that kind of delay is not just frustrating, it is strategically reckless.

To accelerate the process, the Coast Guard awarded a February contract to Davie Defense, Inc., for five additional cutters. That brings the total number of icebreakers under contract to 11, a number that sounds encouraging until one remembers how long these ships can take to build, test and field.

Healy’s latest casualty also comes with history. The 27 year old cutter was previously sidelined in 2020 after a fire in a propulsion motor ended a planned deployment, and it experienced another fire in August 2024 while underway.

For now, the Coast Guard is relying on the rest of its available fleet to hold the line in the Arctic.

The crew appears to have done its job under pressure, but the broader lesson is obvious enough: America needs more icebreakers, faster repairs and far less tolerance for delays that leave critical missions hanging in dangerous waters.


Scroll to Top