Uncategorized

Ultra-liberal former Labor Secretary Robert Reich has made a name for himself with hysterical declamations on social media about the eternally-looming dictatorship under Donald Trump, the end of the world from climate change, and the other usual leftist catastrophe fantasies. What’s funny is how convinced they are that it’s conservatives who have lost their brains and react only out of hysterical emotion.  
 
Even when he’s right, he’s wrong. Here’s an example, with Reich states some true (but awesome) things about what’s likely to happen under a second Trump administration.  

“Fully unhinged.” Really, Bob? A majority of Americans don’t, actually, like illegal immigration. They would like to see people who are here illegally kicked out, much like homeowners with squatters would like to see those thieves removed.  

Commentator James Lindsay calls what Reich is doing the Iron Law of Woke Projection. It means that whatever sin or evil someone like that accuses someone else of is actually a reflection of the accuser’s state of mind. It’s Reich, not Trump, who is “fully unhinged.” It’s a great example of “reversal”—black is white, up is down, fat is beautiful, addiction is health.  

But what’s satisfying is seeing household names like Reich encounter the views of real people who don’t live in his rarefied liberal media bubble. Thanks to Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter, normal and sane Americans can be heard once again. Check it out: 

Ouch, Bob.  
 
Do you have any fully unhinged ideas you’d like to see a Trump administration take on? Tell us in the comments below! 

In a recent interview on MSNBC, Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) made a thought-provoking statement: Donald Trump would sell this country for a dollar.

"Donald Trump would sell this country for a dollar if he thinks that it would benefit himself." @AOC raises concerns with @alexwagner about Donald Trump's growing desperation. pic.twitter.com/f0M6irMZ9l

— Alex Wagner Tonight (@WagnerTonight) February 24, 2024

Yes, a single dollar.

But let’s not forget AOC’s own controversy – and how easily she can apparently be bought.

In 2021, during New York City’s prestigious Met Gala, AOC made headlines by wearing a white gown with the words “Tax The Rich” boldly scrawled across the back. The dress was intended to be a fashion-forward protest against economic inequality and a call to address wealth disparities in America.

The Allegations and Investigation

1. Impermissible Gifts: A nonpartisan watchdog review found “substantial reason to believe that she accepted impermissible gifts” related to the Met Gala event. The investigation centered on payments for the dress AOC rented for the occasion. The gifts in question included not only the dress but also a handbag, shoes, jewelry, hair, makeup, transportation services, and the use of a hotel room ¹.

2. House Ethics Probe: The Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) issued a report stating that while AOC eventually paid for the rental value of the attire and related services, the payment occurred only after the OCE contacted her during their review. The OCE board recommended that the House Ethics Committee investigate the allegations against her.

3. Denial and Response: AOC denied any wrongdoing, and her counsel emphasized that the matter did not rise to the level of a violation of House rules or federal law. However, the investigation focused on whether her rented dress violated congressional rules about gifts.

AOC’s Explanation

AOC defended her choice to wear the “Tax The Rich” dress, stating that she intended to carry the message into a wealthy space. She borrowed the dress because she believed that while the Met Gala is known for its spectacle, it was essential to have a conversation about wealth and privilege.

Public Reaction

The controversy sparked intense debate. Some praised AOC’s bold statement, while others criticized her for attending an event associated with opulence while advocating for taxing the wealthy. The dress became a symbol of her commitment to addressing income inequality.

Remember, folks – Donald Trump isn’t the only politician who can be bought. It’s something they’re all pretty good at.

From Global Strategy to Ideological Battles: A Critical Look at Antony Blinken’s Woke Tenure

The State Department has increasingly diverged from its foundational goals of safeguarding U.S. security, fostering economic prosperity, and upholding democratic principles internationally.

In its execution of foreign political, cultural, and educational initiatives, there appears to be a shift in focus away from the primary targets outlined in its Joint Strategic Plan (JSP) alongside the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). This redirection prioritizes ideological notions that lack broad acceptance within the United States and frequently face opposition from U.S. allies and adversaries.

In the world of politics, the role of the Secretary of State is crucial in shaping a nation’s foreign policies and diplomacy. Antony Blinken, the current Secretary of State, has been at the forefront of implementing what some consider to be “woke” policies. This article aims to objectively analyze Blinken’s approach to diplomacy and examine the successes and failures of his tenure. From China and Israel-Hamas relations to Ukraine and Afghanistan, each diplomatic endeavor will be scrutinized.

Failure at China Diplomacy:

Secretary Blinken’s handling of China relations has faced criticism from liberals and conservatives. While the United States seeks to balance economic cooperation and address human rights concerns, Blinken has been accused of falling short in achieving meaningful progress. This failure has impacted the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as trade tensions between the two nations continue to escalate.

Failure at Israel-Hamas Diplomacy:

The Israeli-Hamas conflict is one of the most contentious issues in international politics. Despite his efforts, many have deemed Blinken’s approach to this conflict ineffective. The inability to broker a lasting peace agreement has increased casualties and instability in the region. This failure has strained diplomatic relations and hindered progress towards a peaceful resolution.

Failure at Ukraine Diplomacy:

Ukraine has been a focal point of international tensions, mainly due to its ongoing conflict with Russia. Blinken’s handling of the Ukraine crisis has been met with mixed reviews. While he has shown support for Ukraine’s sovereignty, critics argue that his approach lacks the necessary assertiveness to deter further aggression from Russia. This failure has strained relations with Ukraine and weakened confidence in the United States’ commitment to its allies.

Failure at Afghanistan Withdrawal:

One of the most significant challenges faced by Blinken was the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan. The hasty withdrawal resulted in a rapid takeover of the country by the Taliban, leading to chaos and human rights concerns. This failure has exposed the flaws in the United States’ strategic planning and has raised questions about Blinken’s ability to navigate complex military and diplomatic situations.

Successes and failures have marked Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s tenure. While his commitment to promoting human rights and addressing global challenges is commendable, his approach to diplomacy has faced criticism. The failures in China, Israel-Hamas, Ukraine, and Afghanistan have had significant consequences, impacting the GDP, regional stability, and international trust in the United States.

Secretary Blinken needs to reevaluate his strategies, considering a more balanced approach that prioritizes effective diplomacy without compromising national interests. As the political landscape continues to evolve, it is crucial to learn from these experiences and adopt policies that promote peace, stability, and the well-being of nations worldwide.