News

News

FBI Reveals Photos of Michigan Terror Suspects Training for Halloween Massacre

Federal agents have arrested two men accused of planning an ISIS-inspired terror attack in the Detroit area that was allegedly set to take place on Halloween, according to newly unsealed court documents, as reported by Fox News.

The suspects, identified as Mohmed Ali of Dearborn, Michigan, and Majed Mahmoud, face charges of receiving, transferring, and attempting to receive and transfer firearms with knowledge that they would be used to commit terrorism.

An FBI affidavit revealed that the plot, code-named “Pumpkin,” involved plans for a mass shooting in a Detroit suburb.

According to the complaint, Ali and Mahmoud practiced shooting at a local gun range multiple times, including sessions with a juvenile suspect identified only as “Person 1,” who used the alias “Athari,” and another unnamed co-conspirator.

In one intercepted communication, the juvenile allegedly insisted that the attack occur on Halloween.

“So ya, I talked to my brothers. We are going to do pumpkin,” he reportedly told Ali. “I talked to…[Co-conspirator 4] and [Co-conspirator 5], they said it is getting bad. So we got to do pumpkin, ya.”

Federal agents executed search warrants on both men’s residences and a storage unit in Inkster, Michigan, recovering three AR-15-style rifles, two shotguns, four pistols, more than 1,600 rounds of ammunition, GoPro cameras, tactical vests, and other equipment.

“With today’s unsealed criminal complaint, the American people can see the results of months of tireless investigative work where the FBI acted quickly and likely saved many lives,” FBI Director Kash Patel told Fox News Digital.

“We’ll continue to follow the facts, uphold the law, and deliver justice for the American people.”

Investigators say the alleged plot began around September 1 and was scheduled to target civilians on Halloween.

The suspects and several co-conspirators allegedly scouted potential attack locations in Ferndale, Michigan, a Detroit suburb known for its nightlife. Authorities noted that none of the suspects were older than 21, which raised further suspicion.

The FBI said the suspects referenced the November 2015 ISIS terrorist attacks in Paris, where 137 people were killed and more than 400 injured, allegedly saying they wanted to “do the same thing as France.”

Court documents show that a co-conspirator returning from overseas was stopped by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, who reportedly found Google searches for “ISIS” and “Islamic State” on his phone, along with photos of him holding weapons while wearing tactical gear.

Although ISIS lost control of its territory in 2019, federal authorities said the group continues to inspire individuals through online radicalization.

Investigators also discovered that the Michigan suspects shared extremist propaganda in encrypted messaging apps, including WhatsApp, Instagram, and Discord, and had sought advice from the father of a local “Islamic extremist ideologue.”

Michigan Halloween Plot Foil by connectwithchristineee

Both Ali and Mahmoud were legally able to purchase firearms. According to investigators, records show multiple gun purchases, modifications, and ammunition orders tied to their names.

Among the seized weapons were a Beretta A300 Ultima Competition 12-gauge shotgun, a Daniel Defense M4 V7 rifle, several 5.56 rifles from Palmetto State Armory, and a Sig Sauer 9mm pistol.

The FBI said the investigation remains ongoing and that additional charges could be filed as agents continue to review evidence recovered from the suspects’ homes and electronic devices.

News

American School Director and Son Killed by Hornet Swarm in Laos

An American private school director and his teenage son were killed after being attacked by hundreds of hornets while ziplining during a vacation in Laos earlier this month, according to local reports and diplomatic sources, as reported by The Daily Mail.

Daniel Owen, 47, and his 15-year-old son, Cooper, died on October 15 after being swarmed by what officials believe were Asian giant hornets while participating in a ziplining excursion at an eco-adventure resort near the city of Luang Prabang.

The pair, who had been living in Vietnam, were reportedly attacked mid-zipline and were unable to reach safety as the insects surrounded them and their guide.

A source close to U.S. diplomats in Laos told The Times that rescuers struggled to bring the victims down from a tree as the hornets continued to swarm.

Both Owen and his son were conscious when they arrived at a local hospital, but later died from their injuries. Dr. Phanomsay Phakan of the Phakan Arocavet Clinic, where the two were treated, described the scene as unlike anything he had ever encountered.

“Their whole bodies were covered in red spots. It was very, very painful. A lot of stings, more than one hundred, over the whole body,” he told reporters. “I thought already that it’s a very dangerous situation because I had never seen it as bad as that.”

Officials said there were no signs of anaphylactic shock prior to their deaths, suggesting the stings themselves and resulting trauma caused the fatalities.

Originally from Idaho, Owen had spent nearly two decades living and working overseas with his family. He served as the director of the Haiphong branch of Quality Schools International (QSI), a private educational network serving children of diplomats and expatriates in multiple countries.

In a statement posted to social media, QSI confirmed the deaths and paid tribute to Owen’s career and commitment to education.

“We are deeply saddened by the sudden passing of Dan Owen, Director of QSI International School of Haiphong, and his son Cooper, due to a tragic accident,” the organization wrote.

“Dan dedicated 18 years to QSI, serving in five different schools and touching countless lives with his warmth, leadership, and unwavering commitment to education. He was deeply loved across our community and will be profoundly missed. Our sincere condolences go out to the Owen family and all who knew and loved them.”

Owen, his wife Jennifer, and their son had been living in Vietnam at the time of the trip. Social media posts show the family frequently enjoyed outdoor adventures such as climbing and skiing. The Laos trip was intended as a father-son excursion to explore the jungle.

Asian giant hornets, sometimes referred to as “murder hornets,” are among the largest hornets in the world, with venom that can cause kidney failure, tissue damage, and cardiac arrest when multiple stings occur.

Laotian authorities have not released further details on the ongoing investigation.

News

Mississippi Mom Shoots Escaped Lab Monkey to Protect Her Kids

A Mississippi mother shot and killed one of the escaped research monkeys from a recent highway accident, saying she feared for the safety of her children after spotting the animal near her home Sunday morning.

Jessica Bond Ferguson, a mother of five living in Heidelberg, Mississippi, told the Associated Press that she was alerted by her 16-year-old son to the presence of a monkey in their yard.

When she looked outside, she said the animal was approximately 60 feet from the house.

“I did what any other mother would do to protect her children,” Ferguson told the Associated Press.

“I shot at it and it just stood there, and I shot again, and he backed up and that’s when he fell.”

Authorities confirmed that the monkey Ferguson shot was one of several that escaped following a truck accident in late October.

The vehicle, which was transporting Rhesus monkeys from the Tulane National Biomedical Research Center in Louisiana, overturned on a Mississippi highway, leading to the escape of 21 animals.

Thirteen of the monkeys were quickly recovered by law enforcement and animal control teams.

Five others were shot at the scene after an initial claim by a supervisor suggested they might be infected with COVID-19, herpes, and hepatitis C. Officials later clarified that the monkeys were not infected with any of those viruses.

That left three of the monkeys unaccounted for, prompting an ongoing search across rural areas in southeastern Mississippi.

Local authorities said another of the escaped monkeys was captured on Sunday, the same day Ferguson shot the animal near her property.

As of Sunday evening, officials confirmed that only one monkey remains unaccounted for.

The Rhesus monkeys were being transported for biomedical research purposes when the accident occurred.

The truck, traveling from the Tulane National Biomedical Research Center to another facility, overturned on a stretch of highway near Laurel, Mississippi.

Officials from the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks have not stated whether Ferguson will face any charges for shooting the animal, noting that the investigation remains open.

Residents in the area had previously been advised to contact law enforcement immediately if they encountered any of the monkeys, rather than attempt to approach or capture them.

Rhesus monkeys are native to South and Southeast Asia and are commonly used in medical research due to their genetic similarity to humans.

Following the accident, the Tulane National Biomedical Research Center confirmed that none of the monkeys involved in the incident were infected with diseases, and that recovery operations had been underway in coordination with local authorities.

Heidelberg, located in Jasper County, is a small town with a population of around 1,000 residents.

Several residents had reported sightings of the escaped monkeys in nearby wooded areas over the past two weeks, prompting increased patrols and wildlife monitoring.

The incident has drawn attention from both state officials and animal welfare groups, though no official statements have been released regarding the fate of the remaining monkey.

Authorities have continued to urge the public not to engage with the animal if it is spotted and to report any sightings to local law enforcement.

News

Trump Rejects Globalists’ Climate Circus in Brazil, Doubles Down on U.S. Energy Growth

The White House confirmed that no top U.S. officials will attend this month’s United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30) in Belém, Brazil, as President Donald Trump shifts focus toward strengthening domestic energy production and job growth.

The conference, scheduled for November 10 to 21, 2025, is expected to draw tens of thousands of delegates, but the United States will not be represented by high-level administration officials.

A White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told AFP that “the U.S. is not sending any high level representatives to COP30.”

“The president is directly engaging with leaders around the world on energy issues, which you can see from the historic trade deals and peace deals that all have a significant focus on energy partnerships,” the official added.

The decision follows Trump’s January move to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement for a second time, fulfilling a campaign pledge to distance the U.S. from international climate accords.

The withdrawal also halted U.S. financial contributions to U.N.-backed climate programs, a step that drew sharp criticism from environmental groups and allied governments.

Trump had not been expected to attend the leaders’ summit that precedes the main COP30 conference, and his administration has now confirmed it will not send senior negotiators to participate in the talks either.

The president has repeatedly stated that his administration’s priority is to protect American energy independence, expand domestic oil and gas production, and sustain job growth across the energy sector.

The COP30 climate conference, hosted in Belém in Brazil’s northern Pará state, is expected to bring together approximately 50,000 attendees, with some estimates suggesting the number could exceed 60,000.

Organizers say the surge in attendance has already strained the city’s accommodations and transportation infrastructure, with hotels near capacity and airports preparing for heavy traffic during the two-week event.

Brazilian officials announced Friday that fewer than 60 heads of state have confirmed attendance at the preliminary climate leaders’ summit scheduled for November 6–7.

Those confirmed include leaders from France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Norway, Colombia, Chile, Cape Verde, and Liberia. China has said Vice Premier Ding Xuexiang will represent President Xi Jinping.

The separate pre-summit was introduced this year to reduce logistical challenges for Belém ahead of the main conference.

While the federal government will not participate at a high level, more than 100 state and local officials from across the United States — including governors, mayors, and environmental representatives — are expected to attend COP30 independently.

Many of them are expected to represent regional or city-level initiatives rather than federal policy.

Trump’s decision to bypass the U.N. conference reflects his administration’s broader approach to international climate negotiations.

During his previous term, the president withdrew from the Paris Agreement in 2017, citing concerns that the accord placed disproportionate burdens on U.S. taxpayers while allowing major polluters like China to continue increasing emissions.

The 2025 withdrawal reaffirmed that stance, with the White House stating at the time that the U.S. would not participate in global frameworks that “undermine American sovereignty and economic competitiveness.”

COP30 will mark the first time Brazil has hosted the U.N. climate talks since 2019, when then-President Jair Bolsonaro declined to participate amid disputes over Amazon deforestation policy.

This year’s conference aims to evaluate global progress toward emissions reduction goals set under the Paris Agreement — which the Trump administration has now exited once again.

Despite the absence of top U.S. officials, the conference is expected to proceed with discussions on climate finance, carbon market regulations, and deforestation targets.

Trump administration officials said the president remains focused on advancing U.S. energy partnerships through bilateral trade deals rather than multilateral forums.

News

Hegseth Shakes Up Pentagon: Top Generals Out as New Leadership Takes Over

Two senior flag and general officers have been replaced in the Pentagon within the past week, reflecting ongoing changes under Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dan Caine as they continue reshaping military leadership and strategy across the Department of Defense.

The first major personnel change involves Lieutenant General Joseph P. McGee, director for Strategy, Plans, and Policy on the Joint Staff — commonly referred to as the J5.

According to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the J5 is responsible for developing strategies, plans, and policy recommendations for the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs to support military advice to the President and national leaders while coordinating with interagency and allied partners.

McGee, a career Army officer with 35 years of service, commanded companies in the 1st and 2nd Ranger Battalions, the 1st Battalion, 327th Infantry Regiment of the 101st Airborne Division, and later a brigade combat team within the same division.

He served ten combat deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan and earned multiple commendations throughout his career.

His retirement was announced in a brief statement from the Joint Staff: “Lt. Gen. JP McGee will retire after nearly three years of outstanding leadership and service on the Joint Staff. We are grateful for his 35 years of honorable and dedicated service to the Nation. We owe him a great debt for his service, and it is regrettable anonymous sources would put the focus anywhere else.”

Reports indicate McGee’s exit stemmed from disagreements with Secretary Hegseth and Gen. Caine over strategic priorities, particularly regarding U.S. policy toward Russia, Ukraine, and ongoing operations in the Caribbean.

CNN reported that McGee had “frequently pushed back” on several of the administration’s new defense initiatives, creating tension within the upper levels of the Pentagon.

McGee was promoted to lieutenant general in May 2024 after being renominated by Joe Biden later that year.

That nomination expired at the end of the 118th Congress, and President Donald Trump did not submit his name for renomination, signaling that McGee’s retirement was likely imminent.

His close association with former military leadership, including ex-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley and former Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, reportedly contributed to the decision not to retain him.

The second change involves Rear Admiral Kurt J. Rothenhaus, who was serving as the head of the Office of Naval Research (ONR). Rothenhaus, a 33-year Navy veteran with a Ph.D. in Software Engineering from the Naval Postgraduate School, was reassigned to command the Naval Information Warfare Systems Command (NAVWAR).

Replacing Rothenhaus at ONR is Rachel Riley, a 33-year-old former McKinsey & Company partner who most recently served as a senior advisor at the Department of Health and Human Services within the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

Despite some media speculation, Pentagon officials clarified that Rothenhaus’s transfer was not a dismissal but a lateral move to fill a vacant command position at NAVWAR.

Critics have questioned Riley’s lack of scientific or military background, though Pentagon officials noted that none of ONR’s top military positions are held by scientists.

The leadership structure includes officers with advanced degrees in business administration, systems analysis, and software engineering.

As ONR’s director, Riley will oversee funding allocations and research priorities rather than engage in hands-on scientific work.

Pentagon officials described her management and efficiency experience as consistent with the department’s emphasis on cost reduction and program effectiveness.

These two personnel changes follow a series of leadership reshuffles within the Department of Defense since the start of the year.

More than a dozen senior officials have been reassigned, retired, or replaced, including former Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. CQ Brown, former Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Lisa Franchetti, and the heads of the National Security Agency and Defense Intelligence Agency.

The changes reflect Secretary Hegseth’s ongoing efforts to overhaul Pentagon leadership and restructure the chain of command to align with the administration’s strategic defense and efficiency goals.

News

Nancy Pelosi Reportedly Calling it Quits After Nearly Four Decades in Congress

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is reportedly preparing to retire from Congress at the end of her current term, according to multiple Democratic officials who spoke with NBC News.

The 85-year-old lawmaker has represented San Francisco’s 11th Congressional District since 1987 and is expected not to seek reelection in 2026.

NBC News reported that “multiple Democratic elected officials and top aides in CA and Washington tell @NBCNews they believe NANCY PELOSI will choose not to seek re-election in 2026, after nearly four decades representing her San Francisco-based district.”

A House Democratic leadership aide told the network, “I think she’s preparing to exit the stage.”

Another California Democrat expressed admiration for her long tenure, saying, “I wish she would stay for 10 more years. I think she’s out. She’s going to go out with Prop 50 overwhelmingly passing, and what a crowning achievement for her to do that.”

Pelosi’s potential retirement would mark the end of one of the longest and most controversial careers in modern congressional history.

First elected in a 1987 special election, Pelosi rose to become the first woman to serve as Speaker of the House, holding the gavel during two separate stints—2007 to 2011 and again from 2019 to 2023.

Pelosi played a central role in advancing her party’s legislative priorities and led both impeachment efforts against President Donald Trump during her second tenure as Speaker.

Her leadership often drew fierce criticism from Republicans who accused her of partisan tactics and procedural overreach.

In May 2020, Pelosi authorized the House of Representatives to adopt “proxy voting” for the first time in U.S. history, citing pandemic-related concerns.

The move allowed members to cast votes remotely instead of being physically present on the House floor, a decision opposed by Republicans who argued it violated constitutional requirements for in-person voting.

During the first vote under the new system, 71 Democratic lawmakers participated by proxy.

The practice quickly became a point of contention after reports surfaced that one Maryland Democrat cast seven separate votes on behalf of colleagues in districts he did not represent.

Despite legal and political objections, Pelosi continued to extend proxy voting throughout the remainder of her speakership.

Critics maintained that the system undermined legislative accountability, while Pelosi defended it as a necessary adaptation to safeguard members’ health during the pandemic.

Pelosi’s leadership tenure also included her handling of two impeachment proceedings against President Trump—one in 2019 related to Ukraine and another in early 2021 following the Capitol riot. Both efforts resulted in acquittals by the Senate.

In recent months, Pelosi’s public appearances have sparked renewed discussion about her political future.

Last month, during an interview with NBC Boston, she made headlines for using profanity twice when responding to questions about political polarization and her party’s messaging.

If Pelosi chooses not to run again, her departure would open a powerful seat in a strongly Democratic district that she has dominated for nearly four decades.

The timing of her exit would also coincide with broader generational changes within the Democratic Party, as several long-serving members of Congress approach retirement.

News

Scott Jennings Ends Van Jones’ Immigration Narrative, Pulls Out the Receipts

A heated exchange unfolded on CNN as political commentator Scott Jennings and analyst Van Jones debated President Donald Trump’s immigration policies and their effect on public opinion.

The discussion centered on recent comments from President Trump and new polling data showing voter sentiment on immigration enforcement.

During the debate, Jones argued that President Trump’s recent statement that Immigration and Customs Enforcement “haven’t gone far enough” in deporting illegal immigrants could pose a political problem for the administration.

Jones suggested that the president’s tough stance on immigration might alienate some Republican voters.

Jennings pushed back strongly, citing new polling data.

“I think in a CBS survey that came out today, he had a 52 percent to 48 percent on immigration enforcement, so he was still right side up on that issue in at least that one survey,” Jennings said.

“I do think it’s a polarizing issue, but a lot of people realize we weren’t enforcing federal immigration law. Now we are, and there’s a heavy debate going on. But I don’t know who voted for Donald Trump, who is all that unhappy that he’s essentially doing what he said he was going to do. Which is simply just enforce the law.”

Jennings went on to note that the administration had not implemented any new legislation to achieve those results.

“We haven’t passed any new laws. He’s just enforcing ones that are already on the books,” he said.

According to the CBS News survey referenced by Jennings, 52 percent of voters approve of the president’s handling of immigration enforcement, compared to 48 percent who disapprove.

The data suggests that despite political division over immigration policy, a majority of voters support the administration’s approach to enforcing existing laws.

The exchange highlighted the broader political divide surrounding immigration.

Jones maintained that President Trump’s rhetoric could harm his image among moderate voters.

Jennings, however, countered that the president’s policies were consistent with his campaign promises and reflected the will of voters who wanted stronger border enforcement.

While Democrats have pushed for more leniency in enforcement and greater pathways to citizenship, President Trump has prioritized strict adherence to immigration law and increased deportations of illegal aliens.

The CBS poll cited by Jennings appeared to bolster the administration’s argument that enforcing existing laws remains popular with much of the public, even as critics argue that the policies are too aggressive.

Jennings emphasized that enforcement, not legislative overhaul, has been at the center of the administration’s approach.

“He’s essentially doing what he said he was going to do,” he told Jones, pointing to the president’s consistent message on border control since his first campaign.

News

21 Blue States Refused to Prove Illegal Aliens Aren’t Getting SNAP Benefits

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) officially ran out of federal funding over the weekend as the government shutdown entered its fifth week, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said on Sunday that the department had warned states earlier this year to verify SNAP eligibility to ensure taxpayer-funded benefits were not being distributed to illegal immigrants.

Rollins said that while 29 states complied with the request, 21 states refused to share their data, and two filed lawsuits against the USDA for making the request.

“We told every state to send us their SNAP data so we could make sure illegal immigrants aren’t getting benefits meant for American families,” Rollins said.

“Twenty-nine states stepped up. Twenty-one blue states refused — and two sued us for asking.”

The SNAP program, which provides food assistance to low-income households, has been strained by record enrollment numbers and budget constraints.

According to a 2023 analysis from the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), “households headed by illegal immigrants make extensive use of the welfare system, particularly food assistance programs.”

The report estimated that 59 percent of households headed by illegal aliens receive some form of welfare benefit, including cash assistance, food programs, Medicaid, or housing subsidies.

The CIS report, based on government data, raised questions about how federal and state agencies verify eligibility for these programs.

It stated that the scale of participation among non-citizen households “raises important policy questions, including whether it makes sense to have an immigration system that allows in so many people who turn to taxpayers to support their children.”

The expiration of SNAP funding is expected to have widespread effects, with millions of Americans — and non-citizens — losing access to benefits as the government shutdown continues.

The USDA has not indicated when funding might resume, leaving states scrambling to assess the impact on local food assistance programs.

The political fight over eligibility and verification intensified following the USDA’s audit request.

Federal officials said the effort was part of a broader initiative to prevent fraud and misuse of taxpayer resources, while some state officials claimed it was politically motivated.

Lawsuits filed by two states argue that the USDA’s directive violates privacy laws and oversteps federal authority.

The situation has also reignited debate over long-term dependency within the welfare system.

Local reports, including a recent segment from KOAT 7 in New Mexico, have highlighted cases such as that of Maggie Aragon, a lifelong New Mexico resident who has been receiving SNAP benefits for over three decades.

“Maggie Aragon has been a SNAP recipient for more than three decades,” the report stated.

The case has been cited by analysts as an example of how some assistance programs have evolved from temporary relief measures into long-term support systems.

Under current law, SNAP eligibility is limited to U.S. citizens and certain qualified non-citizens.

However, enforcement of eligibility standards is managed at the state level, leading to inconsistencies in how requirements are applied.

The USDA’s latest review effort was aimed at ensuring compliance across all 50 states, but resistance from several state governments has delayed progress.

As the shutdown continues, the lapse in SNAP funding is adding pressure on both federal and state agencies to resolve disputes over program oversight and fiscal priorities.

With no resolution yet in sight, millions of households remain uncertain about when — or if — food assistance will be restored.

News

Fugitive Democrat Official Flees to Mexico After Elderly Fraud Charges

A former Clackamas County commissioner is the subject of an international manhunt after allegedly fleeing Oregon with her 9-year-old son while facing felony theft charges.

Authorities believe 44-year-old Melissa Fireside crossed into Mexico last week and may be attempting to reach Europe, where she holds an Austrian passport valid through 2032.

Fireside, a Democrat who was elected to the Clackamas County Board of Commissioners in November 2023, resigned her position earlier this year after being charged with multiple counts of first-degree theft and forgery.

According to investigators, she is accused of orchestrating a financial scheme that defrauded an elderly man of tens of thousands of dollars.

Court documents show Fireside allegedly impersonated her mother’s 83-year-old boyfriend, Arthur W. Petrone, to obtain a $21,000 bank loan and a $9,000 credit card advance.

Investigators say she forged Petrone’s signature to access the funds. Petrone, a retired supermarket employee who lived in an assisted living facility, died in August.

His daughter became suspicious after discovering unexplained withdrawals from his accounts and alerted authorities.

The Oregon Department of Justice launched an investigation that uncovered additional evidence suggesting Fireside attempted to secure a $35,000 loan in Petrone’s name but only succeeded in obtaining $21,000 due to insufficient funds in his accounts.

Fireside had been scheduled to stand trial in December.

According to The Oregonian, she failed to appear for a scheduled hearing last week and is believed to have taken her son out of school without notifying authorities.

Investigators discovered that she had left her listed bail address, and travel records indicate she had a flight booked from Mexico to Amsterdam the following day.

Oregon DOJ spokesman Jerry Gorman confirmed to The Oregonian that Fireside possesses a valid Austrian passport but said it remains unclear how she acquired dual citizenship.

Her current whereabouts are unknown.

Prosecutors allege that $29,000 from the fraudulent loans was used to repay a personal debt to Oregon State Representative April Dobson, also a Democrat.

Dobson told The Oregonian she believed she was helping a struggling single mother when she lent Fireside money for “temporary relief for her personal business.”

There is no indication Dobson was involved in or aware of any criminal activity.

At the time of her disappearance, Fireside owned a $900,000 home in Lake Oswego, an affluent suburb outside Portland.

She had also established a limited liability company tied to luxury real estate ventures, according to business registration records.

Investigators suspect that Fireside crossed the southern border by car and continued on to Europe, where her Austrian citizenship would allow unrestricted travel across the European Union.

When she was first charged earlier this year, her attorneys maintained that Fireside was “entitled to the presumption of innocence.”

Federal and state authorities are now coordinating with international law enforcement agencies to locate Fireside and her son.

The Oregon Department of Justice has not yet confirmed whether an international arrest warrant or Interpol Red Notice has been issued.

News

BBC Hit With Bombshell Report of Video Editing to Make Trump Look Guilty of ‘Inciting’ J6 Riot

The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) is facing allegations of misleading viewers after its program “Panorama” broadcast an edited version of President Donald Trump’s January 6, 2021, speech, according to a report published Monday by The Telegraph.

The report cited a 19-page dossier by Michael Prescott, a former external adviser to the BBC’s Editorial Guidelines and Standards Committee, which detailed alleged bias in the state-funded broadcaster’s coverage of multiple political and social issues.

Prescott’s dossier reportedly claims that “Panorama” presented a distorted version of Trump’s remarks delivered near the White House, editing the footage to imply he encouraged violence at the Capitol.

“The spliced together version of Trump’s comments aired by Panorama made it seem that he said: ‘We’re gonna walk down to the Capitol and I’ll be with you and we fight. We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not gonna have a country anymore,’” the document stated.

The dossier asserts that the BBC combined clips taken nearly an hour apart to create a continuous statement that Trump never actually made.

“Senior officials at the BBC have reportedly not responded to the concerns raised in the dossier,” The Telegraph reported, while unnamed managers “refused to admit that a breach of standards occurred.”

In a statement to the Daily Caller News Foundation, a BBC spokesperson said, “While we don’t comment on leaked documents, when the BBC receives feedback it takes it seriously and considers it carefully.

Michael Prescott is a former adviser to a board committee where differing views and opinions of our coverage are routinely discussed and debated.”

According to the official transcript of Trump’s remarks published by NPR, the President’s actual comments were far less inflammatory than those aired by the BBC.

“We’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women,” Trump said during his address.

The Telegraph’s associate editor Gordon Rayner analyzed the BBC segment in a video posted to the newspaper’s YouTube channel. Holding a copy of the dossier, Rayner explained that the first portion of Trump’s remarks used by the BBC occurred at 12:16 p.m. Eastern time, while the second portion—joined to it in the broadcast—came from 1:10 p.m.

“Trump didn’t, in fact, say this at all,” Rayner said.

“The BBC spliced together two clips that took place 54 minutes apart.”

Rayner later added, “It wasn’t until nearly an hour later that he then said the second part of the BBC’s version.”

The demonstration showed the precise timing of the edits used in the broadcast, suggesting deliberate manipulation.

White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson criticized the BBC’s handling of the footage, calling it part of a broader problem in legacy media.

“Trust in the media is at an all-time low because of deceptive editing, misleading reporting, and outright lies,” Jackson told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

“This is yet another example, of many, highlighting why countless Americans turn to alternative media sources to get their news.”

The controversy comes as President Trump continues to pursue and win settlements over what he has described as defamatory or misleading media coverage.

In December 2024, ABC reached a $15 million settlement with the President after he sued the network and “This Week” host George Stephanopoulos for falsely stating that Trump had been found “liable for rape” during a March 10, 2024, interview with Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina.

Separately, Paramount Global announced in July 2024 that it had settled a $10 billion lawsuit filed by Trump over the editing of an October 2024 “60 Minutes” interview with then–Vice President Kamala Harris during the presidential campaign.

The BBC has also faced criticism for bias in its Arabic-language coverage of Israel’s military operations in Gaza following the October 7, 2023, terrorist attack by Hamas that killed more than 1,200 people in Israel.

The network has further been accused of “censorship” in its reporting on transgender issues.

According to The Telegraph, additional excerpts from Prescott’s dossier on BBC editorial practices are expected to be released in future reports.


Scroll to Top