News

Famous Lifelong Democrat ‘Totally Frightened’ by Party, Vows to ‘Campaign For Republicans’
News

Famous Lifelong Democrat ‘Totally Frightened’ by Party, Vows to ‘Campaign For Republicans’

/

Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz said Tuesday that he plans to campaign for Republican candidates in the upcoming midterm elections, marking a significant departure from his six-decade affiliation with the Democratic Party.

During an appearance on The Record with Greta Van Susteren on Newsmax, Dershowitz said that the Democratic Party’s embrace of political extremism and abandonment of constitutional values left him no choice but to support Republican efforts to retain control of Congress.

“They’re [Democrats] not succeeding in persuading the American people that they’re up to a leadership role, which is why, after me being a Democrat for 60 or more years, I am now going to campaign very hard for the Republicans to maintain control of the House and the Senate,” Dershowitz said.

“Not because I love the Republican agenda. It’s because I’m totally frightened if the Democrats were to gain control of either House. Who they would appoint as chair people? Who they would put in the position of inquisitors, and how they would deny rights to people, and how they would introduce a kind of McCarthyism that we haven’t seen since I was a college student in the 1950s.”

Dershowitz, who has long described himself as a liberal Democrat committed to civil liberties, said the party’s current leadership has prioritized attacking President Donald Trump rather than focusing on governance or bipartisan cooperation.

He cited what he described as “left-wing McCarthyism” that has taken hold within Democratic circles.

“It’s left-wing McCarthyism. We’re seeing it throughout the Democratic Party with a few exceptions, like the great Senator Fetterman, who you interviewed, who really is the one person who represents principle, represents honesty, and really nonpartisan approaches in the Democratic Party,” Dershowitz told Van Susteren.

The Harvard Law professor added that he wished more of his former Democratic colleagues would follow the example of Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman, whom he praised for taking independent positions on policy issues.

“I wish his colleagues would learn from him, but they don’t. They are moving toward the extreme, extreme left, and the only thing they care about is trying to hurt President Trump,” Dershowitz said.

His comments come as several Democratic lawmakers have escalated rhetoric toward the president and his administration.

Kamala Harris referred to President Trump as a “fascist” during the 2024 campaign, while Representative Jasmine Crockett of Texas compared him to “Hitler” in multiple interviews.

Dershowitz said that such language reflects a broader problem within the Democratic Party, which he believes has moved away from constitutional principles and due process in favor of political vendettas.

The remarks also come as new polling data suggests that President Trump continues to maintain steady approval ratings among voters.

According to CNN senior data reporter Harry Enten, 52 percent of voters believe Trump is following through on his 2024 campaign promises.

Enten added that Trump’s consistent 43 percent approval rating indicates public confidence in his handling of key issues such as border security, inflation, and crime.

In October 2024, President Trump’s approval stood at 44 percent, and recent surveys suggest his support could pose a challenge for Democrats ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

A New York Times poll shows Democrats leading Republicans by two points in generic ballot matchups, while a Yahoo/YouGov survey shows a four-point advantage.

Dershowitz’s decision to campaign for Republicans is yet another example of the ongoing political realignment among prominent figures who previously identified with the Democratic Party.

His statements mark one of his strongest public rebukes of Democratic leadership to date and signal his growing concern over the direction of the party heading into the next election cycle.

Trump Scores Major Win as Senate Confirms Over 100 Nominees During Shutdown
News

Trump Scores Major Win as Senate Confirms Over 100 Nominees During Shutdown

/

Senate Republicans voted Tuesday to confirm more than one hundred of President Donald Trump’s nominees as the government shutdown continued into another week, marking one of the largest single-day confirmation efforts of his presidency.

In a series of votes that followed party lines, lawmakers approved 107 nominees for various federal positions, significantly reducing the number of pending nominations awaiting action in the Senate.

The confirmations came as the chamber remained at an impasse over legislation to reopen the government, with floor time in recent weeks largely consumed by funding debates.

The newly confirmed group includes several of President Trump’s longtime allies, former political candidates, and senior advisors, as well as nominees to key diplomatic, regulatory, and prosecutorial roles.

Among the most high-profile confirmations was former Republican Senate candidate and NFL player Herschel Walker, who was confirmed as the U.S. Ambassador to the Bahamas.

Sergio Gor, a longtime political strategist and advisor to President Trump, was approved as the U.S. Ambassador to India.

The Senate also reappointed Paul Atkins, who currently serves as Chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission, to another term that extends through 2031.

Other confirmed nominees include senior administration officials and a series of U.S. attorneys and assistant secretaries across multiple agencies.

Tuesday’s vote followed a similar effort last month, when Senate Republicans confirmed 48 additional nominees.

That earlier batch included Kimberly Guilfoyle, who was appointed as U.S. Ambassador to Greece, and Callista Gingrich, who was confirmed as U.S. Ambassador to Switzerland.

The confirmations were made possible under a procedural change adopted by Senate Republicans last month.

The move, described as a “nuclear option” by lawmakers, altered Senate rules to allow a simple majority to confirm nominees, expediting approval of large groups at once.

Republicans said the rule change was necessary to address what they characterized as deliberate obstruction by Senate Democrats, led by Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York.

The Democratic caucus had blocked or delayed dozens of President Trump’s nominees for nearly nine months into his presidency, arguing that the Senate needed more time to vet candidates.

Traditionally, subcabinet-level nominees and others with bipartisan support are confirmed through unanimous consent or by voice vote, which streamlines the process and avoids extended floor debate.

However, Democrats had repeatedly declined to grant those procedural approvals, prompting Republicans to push through the rule change.

Under the new rules, the majority party may bring an unlimited number of nominees forward for confirmation in a single package.

Each nominee must still clear procedural hurdles, including committee approval and a final confirmation vote, but the overall process has become considerably faster.

Republican leaders said the change was intended to restore functionality to the Senate and ensure that critical government positions are filled during a period of continued policy gridlock.

Democrats criticized the move, claiming it weakened minority-party influence in the confirmation process.

Despite the ongoing government shutdown, which has limited legislative activity, Tuesday’s vote marked a significant victory for President Trump’s administration as it works to fill key federal roles.

The White House issued a statement praising the confirmations as “a vital step in advancing the President’s agenda and ensuring effective governance.”

With the latest confirmations, the total number of nominees approved during the current congressional session now exceeds 150, reflecting an accelerated pace of appointments under the revised Senate procedures.

Trump Ends Venezuela Talks, Democrats Enter Melt Down Mode
News

Trump Ends Venezuela Talks, Democrats Enter Melt Down Mode

/

President Donald Trump has directed his administration to end diplomatic outreach efforts to Venezuela, marking a significant change in U.S. policy toward the government of Nicolás Maduro.

The decision was reported Monday evening by the New York Times, which cited officials familiar with the development.

According to the report, President Trump instructed Envoy for Special Missions Richard Grenell last week to stop discussions with Maduro’s representatives.

The decision reportedly followed growing frustration within the administration over what officials described as Maduro’s refusal to relinquish power voluntarily and his continued denial of Venezuelan government involvement in narcotics trafficking.

The Times report stated that multiple military options remain under review as part of contingency planning but noted that no direct military action has been authorized.

Administration officials indicated that the decision to end talks is part of a broader reassessment of U.S. strategy in Venezuela as the administration weighs increased pressure on the Maduro government.

The Times also reported that Senator Marco Rubio has played a leading role in shaping the White House’s approach toward Venezuela, advocating for stronger measures against the Maduro regime and opposing ongoing diplomatic negotiations.

Rubio reportedly viewed Grenell’s discussions as counterproductive and as creating “confusion” about the U.S. position.

Grenell, according to the report, had been exploring potential arrangements that would have allowed American energy companies access to Venezuelan oil resources in exchange for easing diplomatic tensions. Those efforts have now been halted.

In response to the Times article, debate quickly emerged across political and media circles over the nature of Trump’s decision.

Some outlets characterized it as a potential prelude to military escalation, while others described it as a move to reinforce U.S. policy toward a government accused of widespread human rights abuses and links to organized crime.

Estrella Infante wrote on X that the administration’s actions should not be interpreted as “regime change” in the traditional sense, but rather as an effort to “end an era of impunity.”

Infante added, “Venezuela isn’t just another country, it’s a narco-dictatorship allied with enemies of the United States and responsible for regional chaos and mass migration.”

She went on to say, “Venezuelans voted massively on July 28, 2024, and have already stood up against tyranny.”

Members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee’s Democratic caucus have expressed concern over the move, warning that it could heighten tensions in the region.

Some lawmakers described the development as a possible step toward “regime change,” while others called for restraint in any future policy decisions involving Venezuela.

Maduro responded during his weekly state television broadcast on Monday, claiming he had reached out to the Vatican for mediation.

“I have great faith that Pope Leo, as I stated in the letter I sent him, will help Venezuela preserve and achieve peace and stability,” Maduro said.

Maduro also alleged during his broadcast that Venezuelan security forces had foiled a “false flag operation” intended to target the U.S. Embassy in Caracas.

The embassy has been closed since 2019, though a small number of administrative staff remain in the country.

No independent evidence has been presented to substantiate Maduro’s claims, and similar accusations have been made by his government in the past without verification.

The Venezuelan leader’s televised statements come amid growing internal unrest and international pressure following the contested July elections.

The Trump administration has continued to recognize opposition figures as legitimate representatives of the Venezuelan people and has maintained sanctions against the Maduro government.

Administration sources said that all options remain under consideration as the U.S. continues to pursue policies aimed at countering narcotics trafficking and promoting democratic governance in the region.

Convicted Child Rapist’s Life Ends in Prison, Inmate Charged With Murder
News

Convicted Child Rapist’s Life Ends in Prison, Inmate Charged With Murder

/

A former North Carolina middle school gym teacher convicted of sexually assaulting a 15-year-old girl was found dead in his prison cell over the weekend, prompting a homicide investigation by state authorities.

According to the North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, 60-year-old Ernest Nichols was discovered unresponsive inside his cell at Greene Correctional Institution in Maury at approximately 6:50 a.m. on Sunday.

Prison officials attempted lifesaving measures, but Nichols was pronounced dead about 30 minutes later.

The facility was placed on lockdown immediately following the discovery.

Nichols had been serving a 15-year sentence after his 2011 conviction on charges related to the sexual abuse of a minor. He was scheduled for release in September 2027.

On Tuesday, the Greene County Sheriff’s Office confirmed that a murder warrant was issued for inmate Wilbert Baldwin, 41, who was already serving time for a 2010 second-degree murder conviction.

Baldwin remains in state custody as investigators from the North Carolina Bureau of Investigation (NCSBI) and the Department of Adult Correction review the circumstances of Nichols’s death.

Nichols, a former gym teacher at Ransom Middle School, was first arrested in 2009 following allegations that he had repeatedly assaulted a teenage girl over a six-month period beginning in the fall of 2008.

According to court records, the assaults occurred at his home in Huntersville, North Carolina.

Investigators said Nichols used social media to contact the victim, posing as his teenage son on Facebook to send explicit and coercive messages.

A search of Nichols’s home revealed multiple items of evidence, including videotapes, a camera, and other materials linked to the investigation.

Law enforcement officials confirmed that the victim was not a student at the school where Nichols worked.

Police reports from the time stated that the victim’s mother confronted Nichols before his arrest.

During that encounter, Nichols, who was married and had two children, reportedly admitted wrongdoing and called himself a “pig.”

Court documents show that Nichols resisted cooperating during his 2011 hearing.

According to reporting from WBTV, he argued with the presiding judge, claiming not to understand the charges and refusing to enter a plea agreement.

He eventually entered his pleas while being physically restrained by a bailiff.

Officials have not released details about how Nichols was killed, and no information has been made public regarding a possible motive.

The North Carolina Department of Adult Correction has confirmed that Baldwin was served with the murder warrant and will continue serving his existing sentence while awaiting further legal proceedings.

The Greene Correctional Institution has since resumed normal operations, but the investigation into Nichols’s death remains ongoing.

The Department of Adult Correction said all findings will be turned over to prosecutors once the inquiry is complete.

California Democrat Candidate for Governor Has a Full-Blown Meltdown Over Basic Questions
News

California Democrat Candidate for Governor Has a Full-Blown Meltdown Over Basic Questions

/

Former Representative Katie Porter of California is facing widespread criticism after a tense exchange during an interview in which she appeared unwilling to answer a question about how she would appeal to voters who supported President Donald Trump.

Porter, who officially launched her campaign for governor earlier this month, is considered a leading candidate in the race following Vice President Kamala Harris’s decision not to enter.

The California gubernatorial election uses a top-two primary system in which the two highest vote-getters, regardless of party, advance to the general election.

During an interview with Julie Watts of CBS Los Angeles, Porter was asked a straightforward question about how she intended to reach California’s significant number of Trump voters.

“What do you say to the 40 percent of California voters who you’ll need in order to win, who voted for Trump?” Watts asked.

The exchange quickly became tense.

According to those present, Porter appeared visibly frustrated by the question and attempted to cut the interview short.

Sources said the candidate initially refused to continue filming, prompting members of her campaign team to step in.

Video of the moment later circulated online, showing Porter asking that the cameras be turned off while expressing anger over the question.

The incident drew immediate attention across social media and in news coverage statewide, with many viewers noting that Porter’s reaction was unusual for a candidate seeking to represent all Californians.

Commentators observed that her refusal to address nearly half of the state’s electorate could present challenges in a general election, especially as California’s political landscape shows signs of gradual realignment on issues such as crime, housing, and cost of living.

California has faced growing dissatisfaction over economic and public safety conditions in recent years.

Analysts note that rising housing prices, increasing crime rates, and outmigration have caused some traditionally Democratic areas to shift rightward, particularly in suburban and inland regions.

Political observers said that candidates in the 2026 governor’s race will need to address those concerns directly to appeal to a broader base of voters.

Porter, who represented California’s 47th Congressional District until earlier this year, built her political profile through high-profile House committee hearings and progressive economic policies.

Her campaign has emphasized issues such as affordable housing, climate change, and education.

However, critics have argued that her record in Congress and her response to voter concerns could alienate moderates and independents.

The CBS Los Angeles interview marked one of Porter’s first major media appearances since announcing her candidacy.

The gubernatorial race is still in its early stages, but Porter’s confrontation with Watts may influence voter perceptions of her ability to handle scrutiny and engage with constituents beyond the Democratic base.

Political analysts say that as California’s economy and public safety issues continue to dominate the state’s political discussion, candidates who can address those concerns across party lines will likely have an advantage in the general election.

The full interview segment aired Monday evening on CBS Los Angeles, where viewers saw the moment Porter attempted to end the discussion.

The clip has since been viewed widely online and has become a point of debate among both supporters and critics ahead of the 2026 California governor’s race.

Chicago Mayor ‘Declares War’ on Federal Government, TX National Guard Arrives
News

Chicago Mayor ‘Declares War’ on Federal Government, TX National Guard Arrives

/

Roughly 200 members of the Texas National Guard have been deployed to Illinois to assist federal authorities in protecting government property and personnel following a series of violent protests and attacks outside federal facilities in the Chicago area, the Pentagon confirmed Tuesday.

According to a statement provided to Fox News, the Pentagon said the troops were sent “in support of the Federal Protection Mission to protect federal functions, personnel, and property.”

The deployment, approved for an additional 60-day period, follows repeated incidents of violence targeting federal agents and facilities across the state, particularly at the federal center in Broadview, a suburb of Chicago.

The Broadview facility has become a frequent flashpoint for unrest in recent months, with multiple demonstrations escalating into physical confrontations and property damage.

Law enforcement officials said that protesters, many aligned with far-left activist groups, have attacked federal agents, vandalized vehicles, and obstructed operations.

Authorities reported that several individuals have been arrested for assaulting agents, throwing projectiles, and slashing government vehicle tires.

Federal Protective Service officers have used pepper spray, tear gas, and rubber bullets in attempts to disperse the crowds, but the demonstrations have persisted.

The situation intensified on Saturday when approximately ten vehicles deliberately rammed and surrounded federal agents near the Broadview facility.

According to law enforcement reports, one of the rioters was armed, prompting agents to return fire in self-defense.

The Department of Homeland Security said no agents were seriously injured in the incident.

In response to the escalation, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced that additional special operations personnel would be deployed to Illinois.

Noem called the ramming attack “an unacceptable escalation of violence against federal officers” and confirmed that DHS was coordinating with the Pentagon and state officials to secure federal property.

“The elite Texas National Guard are on the ground and ready to go,” Texas Governor Greg Abbott posted on X on Tuesday.

“They are putting America first by ensuring that the federal government can safely enforce federal law.”

Several Democratic candidates running for an open congressional seat in Chicago have been linked to the protests.

Among them are Evanston Mayor Daniel Biss and Kat Abughazaleh, a progressive activist, who were recorded blocking federal vehicles and obstructing law enforcement outside the Broadview facility.

Federal officials said those actions are under review and may result in additional charges.

Tensions have also risen between local and federal officials over the deployment.

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson criticized the operation, calling it “illegal, unconstitutional, dangerous and wrong.”

Johnson claimed during a Monday news conference that he has the authority to declare “ICE-free zones” within the city and prevent federal agents from making arrests.

“The Trump administration must end the war on Chicago,” Johnson said.

“The Trump administration must end this war against Americans. The Trump administration must end its attempt to dismantle our democracy.”

The Pentagon said the troops will continue working alongside DHS and other federal agencies “to protect federal operations and ensure the safety of government employees and facilities.”

The deployment marks one of the most significant federal security responses in Illinois in recent years, as officials seek to prevent further violence at federal sites in the greater Chicago area.

Biden Accused of Provoking ‘the War in Ukraine to Cover Up His Family’s Corruption’
News

Biden Accused of Provoking ‘the War in Ukraine to Cover Up His Family’s Corruption’

/

A senior Russian official has accused Joe Biden of provoking the war in Ukraine to conceal alleged corruption involving his family.

Kirill Dmitriev, who serves as Russian President Vladimir Putin’s special envoy on international economic and investment cooperation, made the claim in a statement to reporters and in a series of posts on X on Monday.

Dmitriev said Biden’s actions as president contributed to the escalation of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, which began in February 2022, and alleged that the motivation was tied to his family’s financial interests in the region.

Dmitriev stated, “Former U.S. President Joe Biden provoked the war in Ukraine to cover up his family’s corruption.”

He added, “The truth is coming out and justice must follow.”

Dmitriev has been the chief executive officer of the Russian Direct Investment Fund, Russia’s sovereign wealth fund, since 2011.

In February of this year, he was appointed as Putin’s special envoy on international economic and investment cooperation.

His remarks followed reports that Biden allegedly intervened to suppress a Central Intelligence Agency report related to his family’s dealings in Ukraine.

According to Dmitriev, the report contained findings about financial connections between members of the Biden family and Ukrainian business interests.

He further claimed that Biden’s team pressured Ukrainian officials to remove individuals who had uncovered evidence of alleged wrongdoing.

Dmitriev shared multiple posts on X referencing what he described as long-standing knowledge of the Biden family’s activities in Ukraine.

One of the posts included a resurfaced message originally published five years ago, which he said showed that information about Biden’s alleged involvement in Ukrainian corruption had been known internationally for years.

The allegations by Dmitriev come amid continued scrutiny of Biden’s family business activities in Ukraine and other countries.

Hunter Biden, the former president’s son, has faced legal and congressional investigations in the United States concerning his foreign business dealings and tax matters.

While U.S. officials have not publicly commented on Dmitriev’s specific statements, the claims have drawn renewed attention to previous discussions about the former president’s role in Ukrainian affairs during his time in office.

The Russian Direct Investment Fund, which Dmitriev leads, has been sanctioned by the United States and its allies since 2022 for its connections to the Russian government.

Dmitriev’s appointment as Putin’s envoy earlier this year expanded his responsibilities to include coordination of economic initiatives with foreign nations and representation of Russia’s financial interests in global forums.

The remarks from one of Russia’s top financial officials mark the latest in a series of statements by Russian leaders criticizing Biden’s handling of U.S.-Russia relations and his approach to the conflict in Ukraine.

Dmitriev’s comments suggest that Moscow intends to continue framing the war as a product of Western political manipulation rather than Russian aggression.

Dmitriev concluded his public remarks by reiterating his claim that the “truth is coming out” about the Biden family’s actions in Ukraine, signaling that Russian officials may continue releasing additional allegations as part of ongoing diplomatic and information exchanges with Western nations.

Inside the Navy’s Battle for Spare Parts: How Bureaucracy and Vendor Control Are Putting Our Military Readiness to the Test
News

Inside the Navy’s Battle for Spare Parts: How Bureaucracy and Vendor Control Are Putting Our Military Readiness to the Test

/

The strength of the United States military has always rested not just on cutting-edge technology and highly trained personnel, but on a robust system that keeps every jet, ship, and vehicle mission ready.

Yet, a new government watchdog report reveals that the U.S. Navy is facing an alarming reality: to keep essential weapon systems running, maintainers have had to cannibalize grounded equipment for spare parts.

This problem, born from a tangle of vendor-controlled data rights and government red tape, is not just an issue of supply but a matter of national security and military readiness.

The report, released by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shines a light on a critical issue that has been festering beneath the surface of the Department of Defense.

Because the DOD lacks the necessary data rights and intellectual property from contractors, Navy maintainers are frequently forced to rely on vendors for replacement parts.

As a result, delays in repairs can stretch on for months, pushing our sailors and airmen into a position where they must repurpose parts from other grounded aircraft and submarines just to meet operational requirements.

The roots of this problem stretch back to the way contracts are written and the types of data the DOD secures when acquiring new weapon systems.

Statutes allow the DOD to access operational, maintenance, installation, and training data, but they stop short of granting rights to detailed manufacturing information.

Therefore, when a crucial component fails, only the original vendor can supply the part, often on their own timeline and at their price. This leaves the military at the mercy of contractors, who are not always incentivized to act quickly.

The GAO found that across several high-profile programs—including the F/A-18 and F-35 fighter aircraft, the Littoral Combat Ship, the Stryker Combat Vehicle, and the Virginia-class submarine—Navy and DOD personnel lacked the essential data rights to perform depot-level sustainment.

This kind of maintenance is highly specialized, and the inability to perform it without vendor involvement means the military faces vendor lock, with the government paying more for longer waits.

For example, maintainers working on the F/A-18 shared with the GAO that, after years of unsuccessfully attempting to secure the data rights for frequency cables, they were “cannibalizing grounded aircraft for the part.”

The only available replacement came from the original vendor, who controls the production and distribution timeline.

This workaround might keep some jets in the air, but it comes at a significant price. According to the report, “ripping parts from grounded aircraft to plug holes in others can lead to an uptick in maintenance costs, workload, and aircraft availability.”

The story was similar for those responsible for the Virginia-class submarine. Maintainers were again forced to cannibalize parts from other submarines, all because of contractor ownership of technical data for key components.

This is not just a logistical headache; it directly undermines military readiness at a time when geopolitical tensions call for a robust and fully functional fleet.

The consequences of this system go beyond just spare parts.

When the DOD fails to obtain full data rights or mismanages the intellectual property it does receive, the result is miscommunication and misunderstanding about what the government can and cannot do to keep its systems operational.

The GAO report makes it clear that this disconnect hampers the military’s ability to plan for the long term, as DOD offices cannot always anticipate exactly which data rights they’ll need down the road.

Sometimes they ask for too little, creating problems later. Other times, if they overreach, contractors are scared off or costs balloon.

The GAO’s solution is clear: Congress should step in and clarify exactly how manufacturing data must be handled in contracts between the DOD and vendors.

The watchdog further recommends that the Pentagon provide additional intellectual property planning for systems already in sustainment and reexamine how they evaluate the delivery of technical data.

From a broader perspective, this is the kind of government mismanagement that true leaders seek to address. When America’s military is forced to borrow parts from one system just to keep another running, it is a sign that the bureaucracy has overtaken common sense.

What our servicemen and women need is not more red tape or more vendor control, but leaders willing to take decisive action—leaders who put American security and military superiority first.

In the current administration, there is a growing call for strong, principled leadership at the top of the Department of Defense, and voices like Secretary Pete Hegseth have signaled a shift toward accountability, innovation, and putting the warfighter first.

By embracing a results-driven approach, Washington can ensure that the Navy and all branches of the military are never again left scrambling for spare parts. Our readiness and our national security depend on it.

DOJ Charges Oregon Rioter for Assaulting Federal Officer Outside Portland ICE Facility
News

DOJ Charges Oregon Rioter for Assaulting Federal Officer Outside Portland ICE Facility

/

The United States Department of Justice has charged a 29-year-old Oregon man for assaulting a federal officer during a weekend riot outside the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Portland.

According to court filings, Jairin Anzaldua-Ervin of Gervais was arraigned Monday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon.

Federal prosecutors allege that Anzaldua-Ervin threw a large object at a federal officer, striking him in the chest during a violent confrontation at the ICE property on Saturday.

The charge of assaulting a federal officer carries a maximum penalty of eight years in federal prison.

The incident occurred on October 4, when a crowd of demonstrators—many associated with Antifa networks—marched from Elizabeth Caruthers Park to the South Portland ICE facility around 1 p.m.

The demonstration quickly escalated into trespassing and violent conduct on federal grounds.

An FBI affidavit filed with the court states that Anzaldua-Ervin ignored repeated lawful commands to leave the property and crossed restricted boundaries.

When officers with the Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Protective Service moved in to clear the area, Anzaldua-Ervin allegedly hurled a “large and heavy” water bottle that struck one of the agents directly in the chest.

Federal agents immediately detained Anzaldua-Ervin following the assault.

Surveillance footage submitted as evidence reportedly captured the moment the object was thrown, supporting the charges filed by prosecutors.

“Throwing water bottles, or any object for that matter, at a federal law enforcement officer is not protesting — it’s a crime — and perpetrators will be arrested and federally prosecuted,” said U.S. Attorney Scott E. Bradford for the District of Oregon in a statement.

“I thank the brave members of federal law enforcement who have protected federal employees at the ICE building for more than 110 consecutive nights.”

The Department of Justice said Anzaldua-Ervin was one of 13 individuals arrested during the latest confrontation at the ICE facility.

He was released from custody after his initial appearance and is scheduled to return for further court proceedings.

The Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Protective Service have documented recurring clashes at the Portland ICE facility since the start of ongoing protests more than a year ago.

The site has been the target of organized demonstrations since June 7, when Antifa-affiliated activists began a 24-hour occupation demanding the closure of the facility.

Federal prosecutors confirmed that more than 30 individuals have been charged in connection with criminal acts at the site.

The charges include assault on federal officers causing bodily injury, arson, depredation of government property, and refusal to comply with lawful orders.

Officials said additional cases remain under review as federal investigators continue to examine video footage and other evidence from multiple incidents.

Anzaldua-Ervin’s case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Oregon in coordination with the Federal Protective Service and the FBI’s Portland field office.

Trump Warns Dems of Deadline: Open Up Or These Firings Will Be Permanent
News

Trump Warns Dems of Deadline: Open Up Or These Firings Will Be Permanent

/

President Donald Trump warned Tuesday that prolonged inaction in Congress could lead to significant reductions in the federal workforce and cuts to government programs, as the standoff over government funding entered another week.

The warning came one day after Senate Democrats, led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), voted to block a continuing resolution that would have temporarily reopened the government.

The rejection extended the ongoing shutdown, which began after both chambers failed to agree on a short-term funding bill.

Speaking to reporters at the White House, President Trump said he expected to make decisions about potential layoffs and program eliminations within days if the shutdown continues.

“I’ll be able to tell you that in four or five days. If this keeps going on, it’ll be substantial, and a lot of those jobs will never come back,” Trump said.

“You’re going to have a lot closer to a balanced budget.”

The president’s comments followed questions about how many positions could be affected.

When pressed about whether he had identified specific programs for elimination, Trump said his administration had already identified multiple targets but declined to provide details.

“Oh, sure. We have a lot, I’m not going to tell you, but we’ll be announcing it pretty soon,” he said.

“But we have a lot of things that we’re going to eliminate and permanently eliminate.”

Trump described the shutdown as an opportunity to review government spending and address inefficiencies within the federal system.

“You know, one of the things that we have as some advantage, you could say, but because of the shutdown, which I think they made a big mistake, we’re able to take out billions and billions of dollars of waste, fraud and abuse, and they’ve handed it, you know, to us on a silver platter,” the president said.

The current impasse stems largely from disagreements over health care funding.

Democrats have insisted that any spending bill include expanded Medicaid reimbursements for states covering illegal aliens and increased subsidies under the Affordable Care Act.

Republicans, meanwhile, have pushed for a short-term “clean” funding measure to maintain current spending levels while broader negotiations continue.

Administration officials have been reviewing cost-cutting measures in preparation for the possibility that the shutdown could continue.

Last week, President Trump met with his Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director to discuss potential layoffs and areas for permanent spending reductions.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the discussions in a statement to the Daily Caller, saying the administration was prepared to act if the deadlock persisted.

“Unfortunately, because the Democrats shut down the government, the president has directed his cabinet and the Office of Management and Budget is working with agencies across the board to identify where cuts can be made and we believe that layoffs are imminent,” Leavitt said.

Although no layoffs have been announced, officials said agencies have been instructed to begin identifying non-essential positions and duplicative programs for possible elimination.

During his remarks, President Trump said he had received calls from several Democratic lawmakers seeking meetings but suggested that the party’s leadership was disorganized.

“I’ve been getting calls from Democrats who want to meet with me and are claiming to be the leader of the party,” he told reporters.

“Some of the names I’ve never heard of.”

With no resolution yet in sight, the administration continues to signal that it will move forward with cost-saving measures if Congress fails to approve a new funding plan.

The president reiterated that he remains open to negotiations but will not agree to what he characterized as excessive partisan spending demands.

The shutdown marks one of the most consequential fiscal standoffs of Trump’s second term, with both sides standing firm on issues of health care funding, immigration policy, and federal spending priorities.


Scroll to Top