News

General Michael Flynn urged caution ahead of Donald Trump‘s Inauguration on January 20, warning the President-Elect’s inner circle to expect another assassination attempt.

During a long discussion with Steve Bannon, Flynn reminded Americans that if Trump had lost on November 5 he would be in prison.

Not only were the stakes high, the future of America literally depended on Trump’s win.

But the Deep State isn’t going to hand over the keys that easily.

As Flynn warned, Trump’s victory is part of winning the battle, but it is by no means winning the war.

The fact that Democrats are still pushing to make Kamala Harris president before January should set alarm bells off.

While their election fraud failed this time around, that doesn’t mean they don’t have one last trick up their sleeve.

Here is what Flynn said:

“Most people in America have no idea what’s called a HQE or highly qualified experts that are people that are hired. And this administration is going to hire a bunch of people just like Obama did, stick them into key slots, and they’re going to block and tackle every single day. Those people have to be eliminated. I mean, taken out at the knees, dismissed, take their clearances away, take their badges away, and tell them, Thank you for your service. You’re done. And that has to happen literally on the Friday of Trump taking over. Never mind just starting the deportation campaign. It’s going to take some time to get through all that. That’s not going to happen over a three-day weekend…”

“…Steve, We’ve seen this movie. You and I have been part of it. We’ve been victims of it, and we do not have to go through these scenes again. We can eliminate a lot of this nonsense by being prepared for what we know the enemy is going to do. Right now, talking to you, I do use that word enemy precisely because had Trump lost last night, he’d be in prison. He’d be in prison on November 26. His family would be destroyed. His business enterprise would be destroyed. Guys like Elon Musk would be destroyed. They’d come after you.”

“They’d come back after me because I know they already are. So these are all things that we can’t sit here and pretend like, well, we’re going to be the nice people. We will be effective with the use of the rule of law. We’ll do it properly, but it must, accountability must happen. I’m telling you, Steve, I’m looking at the world of social media, and this is my world. Information and intelligence is my world.”

“I have a lot of people that I’m still in contact with in the government, outside the government, overseas, and people want to see Trump succeed. They want to make sure that he has the right team of people around him, and they definitely want people to be held accountable. Comey comes out recently, I think today, and he starts talking about what Trump is going to do to the DOJ and the FBI.”

“You’re damn right, Jim Comey! You committed crimes against this country. You committed treason as far as I’m concerned. I mean, never mind cutting my legs out. Guys like him did so much damage to our country, never mind Obama and some of the others. That’s why at the end of that tweet there, that I say, Sorry, not this time, Obama. Fool us once, shame on us.”

“Try to fool us again, shame on you. And you can tell from the tone of Obama in the last couple of days and what he is saying, these people are up to no good. I want to remind people, and I’ll say it again. I hate repeating myself on this, but I’m going to say it. Had Trump lost, it would have been Katie bar the door. They would have been salivating to throw a bunch of us in jail or worse. We have got to get there.”

“If we had lost yesterday, they already had that 168-page report was a superseding indictment. Jack Smith was going to walk in a court and file against a bunch of people and file more charges against President Trump and take two or three years to get a rigged jury here in DC and send President Trump to a federal prison for 20 years. It’s obvious.”

“Now, today, Jack Smith is talking about unwinding his office. Hey, Jack, unwind all you want. We’re coming after you. I want to go the angle of attack, the The angle of attack, you think, is it the CIA, is it FBI, is it the legal? You got to start with some motive force first. Where do you go? I’ll tell you, and this is my fun I think that the person behind this is the tactical commander of all this is John Brennan. I really believe that. Yes, 100%. There are people inside that are really good.”

“We have We have decent people, but I think John Brennan is one of the most evil people on the planet. And that man, he’s the tactical commander. Obama is still in the play, and there’s some of these globalist characters. But what we’re facing, Number one, Trump needs to be very, very certain of the security around him. So this is not like, I’ll just depend on my secret service detail. No, you have got to make sure that he feels, and now I’m talking directly to Trump, you have got to feel so confident that there’s always going to be a risk, but that the people around you are going to protect you with their lives. And there’s not going to be any shenanigans with the quality of the people or the numbers of resources that you’re going to need. I don’t care whether it’s aircraft, whether it’s air defense systems, or whether it’s human bodies.”

“That’s number one, because they have already tried it a couple of times. They’ll try it again between now and inauguration. That, to me, is job number one. It’s up to Trump to stay alive. I mean that. I hate to say that in our country, but I’m not making this stuff up. These are already things that have happened Number two, the people that Trump brings around him, these have got to be warriors that are ready to go after the government and really reform. I like this idea about what Elon Musk is talking about and the kinds of things with this government efficiency a task force. I do believe that there are going to be requirements for entire departments like Millei down in Argentina. We have got to get rid of entire departments, like the Department of Education, as an example.”

Watch:

Flynn’s remarks echo that of Conservative commentator Dan Bongino, who warned earlier this month of an “inside threat” within the Secret service.

Bongino said Trump was being targeted by professionals who have likely have infiltrated the Secret Service as part of a broader effort to stop him from returning to the White House by any means necessary.

He noted the word “hunted” was deliberate in order to hammer home the seriousness of the situation.

“I use that word deliberately. Some people will know what I mean if they’re listening, some people who really care,” Bongino said.

“Listen to me. Trump is being hunted by professionals who know exactly what they’re doing, and because I hate teases, is the Secret Service compromised?” Bongino asked.

While everyone is celebrating Trump’s victory, there is still a long way to go until the inauguration. Bongino’s warnings should serve as a reminder not to become too complacent.

Watch:

💥💥💥
Dan Bongino @dbongino says that the whole communications of the Secret Service is likely COMPROMISED‼️
“President Trump Is BEING HUNTED…he’s being HUNTED right now‼️” 👇
💥💥💥 pic.twitter.com/uAiEUm0A7o

— MAGA Kitty (@SaveUSAKitty) September 23, 2024

Read More at the Daily Fetched

Megyn Kelly delivered a fiery message for the liberal celebrity elite following Donald Trump’s historic election win, reminding them that their political opinions do not matter to the average American.

As Kelly pointed out, the American people do not care what Taylor Swift, Beyonce, Jimmy Kimmel, or Mark Hamill think.

From Swift’s cringey Instagram post praising Harris and Walz to Beyonce’s “As a mother, I demand the right to kill children” speech at Harris’ rally, none of that made any difference.

The fact that Trump won in a landslide victory with the entire system against him should remind those celebrities where they should put their opinions in the future.

Megyn Kelly’s hilarious message for celebrities encapsulated this notion.

“One of the big losers? The celeb crowd,” she began.

“Beyonce? Loser. Oprah? Huge loser. J.Lo? … Loser!”

Watch:

Megyn Kelly just eviscerated Beyonce, Oprah, JLo, and Taylor Swift.

I am here for it!

More please! pic.twitter.com/65QkD3HbgP

— Joseph D. McBride, Esq. (@McBrideLawNYC) November 8, 2024

“We would like to know what happened between you and Ben Affleck, what happened between you and P. Diddy, exactly what you’re doing to your butt, and how you keep your skin so glowy.”

“That will end the list of things we care about,” Kelly said regarding Jennifer Lopez.

But Kelly delivered a more brutal message for Swift

“Taylor Swift, sorry you effed around and found out. You do not have unlimited influence,” she said.

“The young girls love you because you sing songs about men who break up with you, and they can all relate to that.”

“No one gives two s**** about your political opinion, so you should take it and stuff it,” she added, hilariously adding that Swift’s next song should be “Stuff It.”

Kelly also criticized Julia Roberts for narrating a Harris-Walz ad about women secretly voting against their husbands’ political views.

“Maybe don’t be the voice of the ad in which we talk about women betraying their husbands,” Kelly noted.

Dave Rubin, who played the clip of Kelly’s hilarious message, chimed in saying, “Of course she’s right,”

“We’ve had it with the celebrities; we don’t care about these people.”

“You want to talk about your skin regimen or your Botox or whatever, fine, fine. But stop bludgeoning us with your bulls*** because you’ve been to parties with child molesters.”

Read More at the Daily Fetched

We modern Westerners have a famously short memory whose span has become even smaller since the internet became a part of most people’s daily lives about 30 years ago. That probably surprised a few people reading (there’s that short memory). Yes, indeed, the internet is blink-of-an-eye-recent. 

We forget news stories in about a day, irrespective of how momentous an event may be. Leftist media hatred for Donald Trump and for half the country’s citizenry accounts for most of this, but the shortened attention and memory span somehow managed to make an assassination attempt on live television seem like something that “maybe happened?” Did you notice that? How a former president was shot on live TV and by the next week it was like it never happened? 

Our cultural memory problem doesn’t just lead to us forgetting consequential events. We also very quickly adapt to new creations of government and policy with precious little pushback, then we promptly forget that these new government agencies have not existed since Moses ascended Mt. Sinai to receive the stone tablets. 

So it is with the U.S. Department of Education. Many of you reading this were alive before it was created; that means many of you were in school and getting an education long before anyone believed the federal government had to be involved in every classroom across the country. In only 100 years, we went from a 15-year-old Laura Ingalls teaching farm boys the three R’s (and doing it well) to a nation that requires teachers to have college degrees (more on that below). 

It was President Jimmy Carter who created the Department of Education in 1979, and we can all see the depths to which “education” has plummeted for U.S. students. The DOE seems unconcerned with the extraordinary rate of illiteracy and innumeracy among American students, but very concerned with “helping” confused and abused children realize that they were born into the wrong sex’s body. 

Why do we have this department? Does it do a better job than states and towns did before 1979? President-elect Donald Trump doesn’t think so, and he’s vowed to tear down the DOE on several occasions. Whether he will get this far remains to be seen, and the opposition from the credentialed class (liberals) will be histrionic and fierce. 

But Trump is already making a start on reforming education by taking aim at the obviously broken college accreditation system. In a new video, Trump laid out his plan to target the left’s influence in higher education.

Trump’s plan to dismantle the U.S. indoctrination system (college) by seizing funds from schools that refuse to comply with his accreditation system.

1. “Our secret weapon will be the college accreditation system.”
2. “Fire the radical left accreditors that have allowed our colleges to become dominated by Marxist maniacs and lunatics.”
3. “We will then accept applications for new accreditors who will impose real standards on colleges once again.” “These standards will include defending the American tradition and Western civilization, protecting free speech, and eliminating wasteful administrative positions that drive up costs.”
4. “Remove all Marxist diversity, equity, and inclusion bureaucrats, offering options for accelerated at low-cost degrees, providing meaningful job placement and career services, and implementing college entrance and exit exams to prove that students are actually learning and getting their money’s worth.”
5. “Direct the Department of Justice to pursue federal civil rights cases against schools that continue to engage in racial discrimination.”
6. “Schools that persist in explicit unlawful discrimination under the guise of equity will not only have their endowments taxed, but through budget reconciliation, I will advance a measure to have them fined up to the entire amount of their endowment.”
7. “The seized funds will then be used as restitution for victims of these illegal and unjust policies.”

Trump's plan to dismantle the U.S. indoctrination system (college) by seizing funds from schools that refuse to comply with his accreditation system.

1. "Our secret weapon will be the college accreditation system."

2. "Fire the radical left accreditors that have allowed our… pic.twitter.com/kL3PthrRZU

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) November 11, 2024

Here’s a sampling of online reaction to Trump’s promise to rout “Marxist maniacs and lunatics” who prop up colleges that indoctrinate young people. 

Basically what he is saying is, get all people that hate America out of Education. I like it.

— Dad of B.S. 🇺🇸 🦁 BS Not Allowed 🥰 1A 2A + More (@DadOfBS) November 11, 2024

Every Ivy League will have to stop teaching radical leftist and communist ideas or risk going under.

— RedWave Press (@RedWave_Press) November 11, 2024

Colleges will start behaving once the money stops flowing in and even starts flowing out.

It’ll be a stark change. And the colleges that don’t comply, well they’ll then go out of business.

Make College Great Again!

— Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 (@Bubblebathgirl) November 11, 2024

The colleges are the ones who have pillaged the US Treasury and should be the ones to repay all the student loan debt

— RustyTexan (@rustytexan1) November 11, 2024

But there’s always one, isn’t there? 

And what, replace smart people with Christian MAGA dipshits?
Not gonna happen.

— Moves Like Dean Jagger (@Richard89220241) November 11, 2024

Pentagon officials are reportedly discussing how to respond to potential directives from President-elect Donald Trump, according to a report by CNN citing defense sources.

The conversations include planning for various possible actions by the incoming administration, such as deploying military forces to assist with mass deportations or reinstating Schedule F, an executive order from Trump’s previous term that would reclassify certain federal employees, making them easier to dismiss.

The reported discussions include “gaming out” scenarios in which Trump could use the military to support federal and local law enforcement in deportation operations.

According to CNN, some officials are preparing for “the worst-case scenario,” though a defense official acknowledged that the actual course of action remains uncertain.

One of the primary concerns among Pentagon officials, CNN reported, is the possibility that Trump could reintroduce Schedule F, a measure he first implemented via executive order in 2020.

Schedule F reclassified certain civil servants as “at-will” employees, allowing for their dismissal based on performance.

Joe Biden rescinded the order shortly after taking office in 2021, but Trump has publicly indicated his intention to bring it back, stating in a 2023 video that he would “wield that power very aggressively.”

The prospect of Schedule F’s return has reportedly generated significant concern within defense circles, with one official telling CNN that they have received a high volume of communications on the topic.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin has previously warned against “inappropriate political encroachments” on career civil servants, while Trump has criticized some in the Pentagon as “rogue bureaucrats.”

Concerns over potential conflicts between Trump and the Department of Defense have also been amplified by Trump’s past statements, including his October comments to Fox News’s Maria Bartiromo about addressing “radical left lunatics” within government ranks.

Trump referenced the possible need for the National Guard or the military to deal with “the enemy within,” a term he used to describe political opponents, including Democratic Reps. Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff from California.

The possibility of a strained relationship between Trump’s administration and the Pentagon has reportedly led officials to prepare for a different dynamic in his second term.

CNN reported that the connection between the Trump White House and the Department of Defense (DoD) was notably tense during his first term, prompting a heightened focus on personnel choices for key DoD roles this time around.

"The unelected bureaucracy of this government answers to the civilian and duly elected leadership."@ScottJenningsKY excoriates Pentagon officials over reports of secret meetings about how to “thwart or countermand the Commander-In-Chief."

The plotting against Trump has… pic.twitter.com/Glptqqvw5q

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) November 9, 2024

Republican CNN contributor Scott Jennings addressed these reported discussions on Anderson Cooper 360⁰, suggesting that if officials are worried about upcoming changes, they should raise their concerns directly with Trump. “What’s Donald Trump supposed to think?” Jennings asked.

“He’s gotta read in the newspaper tonight that the unelected bureaucracy of the federal government is having meetings, at some level, about how to thwart or countermand the Commander in Chief.”

The report comes amid heightened interest in how Trump’s approach to the Pentagon may differ from his previous term.

Many of Trump’s most vocal critics from his first term came from within his own administration, including former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley and former Chief of Staff John Kelly.

Both Milley and Kelly were prominent in their critiques, with Kelly comparing Trump to a fascist and alleging that Trump praised Adolf Hitler, a claim Trump has denied.

As Trump prepares to re-enter the White House, the focus on his potential actions and changes within the Pentagon reflects broader questions about how his administration will interact with the military and defense establishment.

The discussions reported by CNN indicate that defense officials are actively considering the challenges and adjustments they might face under the incoming administration, with scenarios being evaluated to anticipate potential policy shifts under Trump’s leadership.

Read More at LifeZette

CNN data analyst Harry Enten said President Donald Trump‘s massive gains with certain groups in the 2024 election were much worse than a knockout blow for Democrats.

While Democrats suffered meltdowns following their historic loss, Enten said they haven’t fully grasped how bad it was for them.

Enten broke down the numbers, showing how significant Trump’s victory was.

Enten explained how Trump made the greatest improvements over a previous presidential election performance from Republicans since 1992.

“When was the last time a party gained in so many different places?” he asked.

“You have to go all the way back to 1992 when Bill Clinton improved on Michael Dukakis’ performance in 49 states, plus the District of Columbia.”

Enten continued to marvel at Trump’s epic win.

“Donald Trump’s performance on Tuesday was the best for a Republican presidential candidate in exit poll history.”

“He literally goes all the way back through history and breaks history.”

According to Enten’s chart, Trump improved his party’s election performance in 49 states and Washington, D.C., over the 2020 election.

“You know, I think the breadth of the improvement that Donald Trump had – Holy Toledo!”

Earlier this week, CNNs Jake Tapper admitted Trump’s election victory was the “greatest comeback in history.”

“It is hard to think of a political comeback that is actually more significant than this one. I’m tempted to say Richard Nixon, but that really falls short of what Donald Trump has achieved.”

Read More at the Daily Fetched

Voters in Alameda County, California, have recalled District Attorney Pamela Price, marking the first time the county has removed an elected DA from office.

Price, who was backed by George Soros and known for her “criminal justice reform” policies, was ousted by a significant margin in one of California’s most left-leaning areas, which includes the city of Oakland.

Early Wednesday morning, Alameda County released unofficial results showing that 64.8% of voters supported recalling Price, while 35.2% voted to keep her.

Although official results may take a few days to finalize, the recall’s outcome underscores growing dissatisfaction with progressive criminal justice policies, even in traditionally liberal communities.

According to Mercury News, Price’s recall represents a notable shift in attitudes toward criminal justice reform in California.

Price, who had been in office for less than two years of her six-year term, had faced mounting criticism over policies that many residents saw as too lenient on crime.

Her approach included measures aimed at reducing incarceration and supporting alternatives to prosecution for certain offenses, but critics argued that these policies contributed to rising crime in Oakland and other parts of Alameda County.

Price was one of several progressive prosecutors across the country whose campaigns received financial backing from billionaire George Soros.

Soros has supported numerous candidates promoting criminal justice reform, particularly those who ran on platforms aligned with the Black Lives Matter movement.

However, in California, backlash against these policies has become increasingly visible.

Last year, voters in San Francisco recalled DA Chesa Boudin, another Soros-backed prosecutor, after widespread complaints about rising crime and public safety issues.

On Tuesday, Soros-backed Los Angeles County DA George Gascón, who also implemented similar policies, lost his re-election bid by a wide margin.

During her tenure, Price faced a series of controversies that fueled public discontent.

Notably, her laptop was stolen from her car in Oakland—a city grappling with escalating crime and the effects of “defund the police” policies that led to reduced law enforcement resources.

Price was also accused of nepotism after hiring her boyfriend, despite concerns raised about his background.

Beyond local recalls, California voters have taken other actions to address crime and safety concerns.

In recent state elections, a large majority voted in favor of Proposition 36, a measure designed to counteract some of the unintended consequences of Proposition 47, which passed in 2014.

Proposition 47 reduced penalties for certain theft and drug offenses, but critics say it has contributed to an increase in retail theft, looting, and other crimes.

Proposition 36 aims to reintroduce stricter measures, signaling a statewide shift toward policies that prioritize public safety over leniency.

The recall effort against Price gained momentum as Oakland residents and business owners voiced frustration with policies they believed were inadequate for dealing with the city’s crime issues.

Under Price’s leadership, Oakland had experienced a surge in crime, prompting criticism from citizens who felt that public safety was not being adequately addressed.

The recall’s success could influence similar efforts in other regions, as voters reconsider the impact of progressive criminal justice policies.

Alameda County’s decision to recall Price may have broader implications for the future of progressive criminal justice reforms in California and across the U.S. Price’s removal, along with the recent recalls and defeats of other high-profile reformist prosecutors, highlights a potential shift in public opinion.

As California’s bluest areas push back against progressive policies perceived as ineffective, the state may see a return to more traditional approaches to criminal justice in an effort to curb crime and enhance public safety.

Read More at LifeZette

Maxine Waters joined a growing number of Democrats attempting to blame “racism” on Kamala Harris‘s devastating defeat in the U.S. presidential election against Donald Trump.

Some have even gone as far as to blame sexism too!

For years, Waters has been dividing Americans with her race-baiting politics, with everything from inciting violence against Trump supporters to dividing America with her “white supremacy” narrative.

During an appearance on News Nation with Chris Cuomo, Waters was asked, “What lesson should your party have learned?”

Waters responded:  “The Democratic Party worked very hard; they raised a substantial sum of money, and we had great candidates.”

“Trump had a following generally led by white males. White males voted in big numbers.”

“He had a few from the other race groups that joined, like the Latinos at 45 percent, and black men at about the same rate that they did when they voted for him before at about 20 percent, and that combination won.”

“It’s not that Democrats did not work hard and did not do a great job. We had an unusual situation where we had a black woman, which this country has never seen before.”

“A combination of all these things led to his [Trump’s] win.”

Chris Cuomo responded: “I will not push back on the idea that race and sex matter in America and politics; I think they do.”

“I don’t know if that is the controlling variable, and you don’t suggest otherwise. To me, it seems to be that the Democrats thought ‘Trump stinks’ is enough.”

“Senator Bernie Sanders said something that reminded me of you: The Democratic Party used to be, ‘We are all about doing for working people; that’s what we do.’

“You are now seen as not that, even by Bernie Sanders.”

Read More at the Daily Fetched

A Democratic majority in the Michigan House flipped on Tuesday to an even bigger majority for Republicans, setting the table for the GOP to investigate Democratic malfeasance next year. Michigan Republicans broke a two-year Democratic government trifecta on Election Day by holding on to seats occupied by vulnerable House Republicans and flipping four seats held by Democrats.

In Michigan House District 27, Republican Rylee Linting leads Democratic incumbent Jamie Churches 51.6%-48.4% with 95% of votes counted, while Republican Ron Robinson holds a seven-point lead over Democratic incumbent Nate Shannon in District 58 with 91.83% of the vote in, the Detroit Free Press reports. Republican Steve Frisbie leads Democratic incumbent Jim Haadsma by 19.4% with just 25.81% of the vote counted in District 44. Democratic incumbent Jenn Hill is also poised to fall to Republican Karl Bohnak in District 109, where Bohnak leads 51.3%-48.7% with 99% of the vote in.

The situation is expected to shift Democrats’ 56-54 majority in the lower chamber to a 58-52 majority for Republicans, according to projections by The Detroit News.

Read the Full Story at The Midwesterner

There was an episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation, about a race of aliens called the Binars. They were a genetically enhanced race with computer processors in their heads, and they were androgynous and apparently sexless, with bald heads and indeterminate body shapes. Their non-threatening appearance was key to their success at stealing the Enterprise from space dock. 

Have they been with us here on Earth, and have they been participating in the election? Or, have they been altering certain leftist humans slowly, replacing our usual friends with weirder and less sexy versions? 

Something strange is going on, if this tweet from prominent commentator James Lindsay is any indication. 

Pretty interesting. Thoughts? https://t.co/tme2Gzkwbp

— James Lindsay, anti-Communist (@ConceptualJames) November 8, 2024

I know, it’s confusing. How is it possible to have categories of voters other than “male” and “female,” first of all? It is not possible, of course, but America has been playing in the land of make-believe for at least 10 years about human anatomy. We’re supposed to believe that there are “transgender women,” but those are just men who call themselves women (and vice-versa for “transgender men”). Apparently all you need to do to fundamentally change reality today is slap on the opposite sex’s clothing and throw tantrums whenever someone recognizes that you’re wearing a costume. 

But wait, there’s more! Have you heard of the “non-binaries?” These are an even more special subset of the alleged transgender community. Usually, but not always, “non-binary” people are women (who look just like yesterday’s plain old lesbians) who claim to be neither male nor female.

Reader, don’t sweat this too hard. You can’t make it make sense. Just roll with me. 

So apparently the non–binaries are 1 percent of the population. Of that tiny sliver, 73 percent voted for Kamala Harris, while 21 percent chose Donald Trump, which admittedly is surprising.  

Let’s see whether X/Twitter users are playing along with this fun insane asylum game!

Did the non-binary struggle making a choice between 2 people?

— Tryna Be Logical (@TrynaBeLogical) November 8, 2024

Given that that would be my trollish exit poll answer, I can only assume fellow trolls.

— James Harris (@InHumaneShape) November 8, 2024

Non-binary people buy groceries too.

— BRCooper⚡🔋🚀 (@_BRCooper) November 8, 2024

I refuse to accept the fantasy category of "nonbinary/other".

— The Political Doggo (@Doggo_Political) November 8, 2024

Tee-hee.

Kaitlyn Jenner probably ticked that box and it was at Trump's election night in Mar-A-Lago.

— Tree of Life (@TheBloodFreesUs) November 8, 2024