News

Gavin Newsom ‘Invests’ Millions to Keep Killing the Unborn at Planned Parenthood
News

Gavin Newsom ‘Invests’ Millions to Keep Killing the Unborn at Planned Parenthood

/

California Governor Gavin Newsom announced Thursday that the state will allocate more than $140 million in taxpayer money to support Planned Parenthood operations, making California the fourth state to do so after federal funding was cut under actions led by President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans.

The funding will go toward keeping 109 Planned Parenthood clinics open across the state.

California joins Washington, Colorado, and New Mexico in providing state-level funding to replace lost federal support.

“California is a reproductive freedom state, and this latest investment continues to show our belief in protecting access to essential health care in times of distress,” Newsom said in a statement.

“Trump’s efforts to defund Planned Parenthood put all our communities at risk as people seek basic health care from these community providers.”

According to Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, several clinics were preparing to close following the loss of federal funding.

Planned Parenthood was reportedly planning to eliminate primary care services at locations in Orange and San Bernardino counties starting in December.

Five other clinics in the Bay Area, Santa Cruz, and the Central Valley have already shut down in recent months.

“The Planned Parenthood affiliates in California are grateful to Governor Newsom and our allies in the Legislature for taking this necessary step to keep Planned Parenthood health centers open and able to provide critical services as they weather the impacts of the federal defund,” said Jodi Hicks, President and CEO of Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California.

The federal restrictions came through legislation passed by Congress and signed by President Trump earlier this year.

The measure prohibits Planned Parenthood from receiving Medicaid reimbursements for any services, including not only abortions but also other health care such as mammograms, pap smears, birth control, and testing for sexually transmitted infections.

Supporters of the restrictions have long argued that while federal law already bans taxpayer money from directly funding abortions, the organization’s federal reimbursements for other medical services indirectly subsidize abortion procedures.

Planned Parenthood has denied the claim, saying abortions account for less than ten percent of its total services.

Dr. Janet Jacobson, medical director for Planned Parenthood clinics in Orange and San Bernardino counties, told CalMatters that the loss of federal funds is “destroying our primary care program.”

“It’s inhumane to take away people’s health care,” Jacobson said.

“Folks that have Medi-Cal should be able to see the provider of their choice for primary care.”

Planned Parenthood officials estimate that it requires about $27 million each month to operate all of its California facilities.

Hicks said the new funding from the state is necessary to maintain operations following the loss of federal money.

“President Trump and Congressional Republicans’ targeted attacks on Planned Parenthood are not only unconscionable, but a deliberate effort to undermine California’s values and promise of reproductive freedom,” Hicks said.

“Today’s funding commitment is critical to protecting vulnerable Californians’ constitutional right to access reproductive health care.”

Right to life organizations have criticized the decision, arguing that taxpayer dollars should not be used to support an organization that performs abortions.

They also contend that state funding for Planned Parenthood undermines the intent of federal law, which has barred direct federal funding for abortion services since 1977.

California’s decision comes as lawmakers in Oregon and New York consider similar measures to allocate public money to Planned Parenthood.

The organization’s leaders say such state partnerships will be necessary to sustain operations as federal funding remains restricted.

With California’s latest commitment, Planned Parenthood is expected to keep all 109 of its clinics open through 2026, ensuring continued operations in counties that were preparing for closures earlier this year.

Portland Chaos: Antifa Fights Conservatives, Police Make Zero Arrests
News

Portland Chaos: Antifa Fights Conservatives, Police Make Zero Arrests

/

A violent confrontation erupted early Saturday morning outside the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in Portland, Oregon, between Antifa-aligned protesters and conservative activists.

The fight occurred as the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals extended a pause on the federal government’s plan to deploy National Guard troops to the state, leaving federal agents and local police to manage continued unrest in the city.

According to eyewitness accounts and video footage posted online, individuals dressed in black bloc confronted a group of conservative demonstrators gathered near the ICE facility.

Among them was a man draped in a “Make America Great Again” flag.

A heated verbal exchange between the groups escalated when one of the masked individuals struck a conservative protester, leading to a larger brawl in which multiple punches were thrown.

Several conservative activists were heard shouting “F**k Antifa” as the fight intensified.

Federal agents stationed on the roof of the ICE building fired rubber bullets and deployed smoke grenades to break up the altercation and disperse the crowd.

The confrontation took place shortly after midnight.

The Portland Police Bureau (PPB) said it activated its Incident Command Team at approximately 11 p.m. Friday night to monitor the protest, but no arrests were made.

“PPB members did not observe any person or property crimes that warranted interdiction,” the bureau said in a statement.

“No arrests were made. To date, the total number of arrests related to nightly protests in the South Waterfront is 55.”

The latest clash came as the Ninth Circuit issued a Friday order keeping in place a lower court’s temporary restraining order blocking President Donald Trump’s plan to send federal troops to Portland.

The order extends the pause until at least Tuesday, allowing the court additional time to review the case.

“This decision gives the court time to fully consider the serious constitutional questions at stake,” Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield said in a statement.

“It also ensures there won’t be a federal deployment while that process plays out — an important step in protecting Oregonians’ rights and keeping our communities safe.”

Portland has experienced ongoing nightly unrest since June, when Antifa activists began targeting the ICE facility and federal property.

The protests have frequently turned violent, with clashes between demonstrators and federal officers.

According to the FBI, more than 120 individuals have been arrested in connection with attacks on government buildings and law enforcement in Portland, though the violence has continued as local police often decline to intervene.

Earlier this month, President Trump hosted a roundtable at the White House with independent journalists to discuss Antifa’s nationwide activities and escalating attacks against law enforcement.

Attendees included reporters from The Post Millennial, Human Events, and Turning Point USA’s Frontlines. Following the meeting, several journalists traveled to Portland to document the ongoing protests.

Independent reporter Katie Daviscourt of The Post Millennial was assaulted while covering a demonstration near the ICE facility, and journalist Nick Sortor was detained overnight after being attacked by agitators during a separate confrontation.

During the roundtable, President Trump reiterated his administration’s classification of Antifa as a terrorist organization.

“These are not peaceful protests,” he said.

“These are organized groups targeting law enforcement and government institutions.”

Although left-leaning activists and politicians have disputed the classification, citing Antifa’s decentralized structure, federal officials have maintained that the group operates through independent cells that coordinate actions across multiple cities.

The Department of Justice has warned that individuals or organizations involved in efforts to identify or target federal agents, including ICE officers, could face prosecution for endangering law enforcement personnel.

As of Saturday, federal agents continued to secure the Portland ICE facility following the latest outbreak of violence.

The court’s upcoming decision on the National Guard deployment is expected to determine whether federal troops will return to Oregon to reinforce local and federal law enforcement efforts.

Undercover Journalist Exposes Antifa’s Teachers Who ‘Throw Molotov Cocktails’
News

Undercover Journalist Exposes Antifa’s Teachers Who ‘Throw Molotov Cocktails’

/

Independent journalist Karlyn Borysenko joined Fox News host Jesse Watters on Jesse Watters Primetime Friday, where she revealed that many members of the left-wing group Antifa, now designated a terrorist organization, have day jobs in professional fields including education and law.

Borysenko’s comments came as she discussed her recent undercover reporting on Antifa activity in cities such as San Francisco, Seattle, and Portland.

The organization has been active for years but drew renewed attention after President Donald Trump formally designated it a terrorist organization on September 17, citing its role in nationwide unrest and attacks against law enforcement and government property.

During the interview, Watters asked Borysenko about the group’s constant presence at protests outside U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities and at demonstrations in major cities.

“Do these people work, or do they just dance and light fires all night?” Watters asked.

“I think some of them do actually have jobs,” Borysenko replied.

“I mean, these are teachers, some of them are lawyers, some of them, you know, they’re Starbucks baristas, they’re Amazon employees. So, I don’t necessarily agree with the notion that they don’t work.”

Borysenko explained that many Antifa members use their income to fund protest operations through what the group calls “mutual aid.”

“That’s actually part of how they fund all the supplies in those tents is through something called mutual aid, where they take their salaries and they’re donating to those supplies,” she said.

“But certainly, there are some that are kind of out there 24/7.”

Watters pressed her to clarify whether she was saying that teachers were involved in violent activity.

“There are teachers that go and teach elementary school and then at night they throw Molotov cocktails at a building?” he asked.

“Oh, yeah, 100%,” Borysenko replied.

“I was just undercover at a couple of anarchist book fairs over the weekend in both San Francisco and Seattle. There were absolutely teachers in the crowd there. And I picked up multiple stickers and posters with Molotov cocktails, calls to kill ICE and calls to kill the police.”

Borysenko’s comments follow a series of reports highlighting Antifa’s continued activity in the Pacific Northwest.

Portland, in particular, has been a hub for the organization, where members frequently clash with law enforcement and target federal buildings, including ICE offices.

President Trump has repeatedly called for investigations into Antifa’s structure and funding.

He initially vowed in May 2020 to classify the group as a terrorist organization following widespread riots in Minneapolis after the death of George Floyd.

Federal officials have since increased monitoring of the organization’s online communications and financial networks.

Antifa’s origins trace back to at least 2007, but the group gained national attention during the 2020 protests, when its black-clad members appeared at demonstrations across major cities.

The network’s members operate without a centralized leadership structure but coordinate through regional collectives and online platforms.

Borysenko’s findings suggest that Antifa members often balance professional jobs with involvement in militant activism.

Her remarks have renewed questions about how deeply the group’s ideology has spread into mainstream workplaces, including schools and public institutions.

As federal agencies pursue investigations into Antifa’s organization and finances, the journalist said she plans to continue her reporting on the group’s inner workings and recruitment efforts.

“There are definitely people leading double lives,” Borysenko told Watters.

“They go to work during the day and then go out to protest or commit acts of vandalism at night.”

Trump Pulls Off ‘Impossible’ Peace Deal in Southeast Asia Without Firing a Shot
News

Trump Pulls Off ‘Impossible’ Peace Deal in Southeast Asia Without Firing a Shot

/

Cambodia and Thailand signed an expanded ceasefire agreement on Sunday, concluding a long-running border conflict that President Donald Trump helped broker earlier this year.

The agreement, signed at the annual Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, marked the end of fighting that had left dozens of people dead and displaced hundreds of thousands.

President Trump, who played a direct role in bringing both sides to the table, used tariff threats to push the two nations toward peace.

Trump witnessed Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul sign the deal, which calls for Thailand to release 18 Cambodian soldiers held in detention and for both countries to begin withdrawing heavy weaponry from contested border areas.

“We did something that a lot of people said couldn’t be done,” Trump said during the signing ceremony.

Hun Manet described the day as “historic,” while Anutin said the agreement created “the building blocks for a lasting peace.”

The ceremony was Trump’s first public event after arriving in Kuala Lumpur as part of his multi-nation Asia trip, which includes additional stops in Japan and South Korea.

Upon landing, Trump participated in a local welcoming ceremony, where he was seen waving both American and Malaysian flags and performing his signature dance often featured during campaign rallies.

Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim praised the peace accord during his opening remarks at the ASEAN summit, calling it a model for reconciliation through strength.

“It reminds us that reconciliation is not concession, but an act of courage,” Anwar said.

Following the signing, President Trump finalized separate economic agreements with both Cambodia and Thailand to strengthen trade and investment partnerships.

The economic deals, negotiated alongside the peace framework, aim to deepen U.S. engagement in Southeast Asia and stabilize the region’s markets following years of border tension.

In addition, the United States and Malaysia signed new agreements focused on trade and critical mineral supply chains.

The pacts are part of the administration’s broader effort to diversify sourcing and reduce American dependence on Chinese exports, particularly in the production of semiconductors and advanced manufacturing components.

In a joint statement, the U.S. and Malaysia announced an agreement “to strengthen our bilateral economic relationship, which will provide both countries’ exporters unprecedented access to each other’s markets.”

“The Agreement will build upon our longstanding economic relationship, including the United States-Malaysia Trade Investment Framework Agreement signed in 2004,” the statement continued.

The expanded ceasefire between Cambodia and Thailand is expected to be monitored by an international observer team under ASEAN supervision.

Both governments have pledged to begin implementing demilitarization procedures immediately, with troop withdrawals set to start within two weeks.

Trump’s diplomatic involvement, which began earlier in the summer, included direct negotiations with both leaders and multiple rounds of virtual talks.

Administration officials have said the deal reflects the President’s strategy of combining economic pressure with diplomatic engagement to resolve regional conflicts without U.S. troop involvement.

The signing in Kuala Lumpur marks the most significant peace breakthrough between the two Southeast Asian neighbors in more than a decade and reinforces the administration’s stated goal of promoting regional stability through trade partnerships and security cooperation.

Hakeem Jeffries Threatens Investigation Into Trump’s White House Donors
News

Hakeem Jeffries Threatens Investigation Into Trump’s White House Donors

/

Democratic leaders are facing renewed criticism after House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries announced plans to investigate private donors who contributed to President Donald Trump’s White House ballroom project.

The move comes amid widening allegations of selective prosecution within the party, following years of legal efforts aimed at the former president and his associates.

Since President Trump left office in January 2021, Democrats have pursued multiple legal actions against him, a strategy critics have described as “lawfare.”

X Screenshot – Donald J. Trump

Among the most visible figures in those efforts has been New York Attorney General Letitia James, who campaigned on a pledge to “get” Trump and pursued civil cases attempting to seize his business assets.

James’ actions drew widespread attention during and after her high-profile case targeting Trump’s real estate holdings.

Pollster Frank Luntz warned that her legal offensive could boost Trump’s standing with voters — a prediction that proved accurate as the former president’s popularity surged during the proceedings.

Now, James herself is reportedly under investigation for mortgage fraud, a development that has raised questions about the consistency and fairness of the justice system.

The same Democrats who once defended aggressive prosecutions against Trump have since labeled the case against James as a “weaponization” of law enforcement — a term frequently used to criticize political targeting.

While Democratic officials have dismissed the comparison, critics say the situation underscores a double standard. For years, party leaders emphasized that “no one is above the law,” yet opponents argue that enforcement often appears to fall along partisan lines.

Rather than scaling back politically charged investigations, Democrats are pressing forward.

On Thursday, Jeffries told MSNBC that he intends to examine donations linked to President Trump’s ongoing White House ballroom construction project — a privately funded initiative that does not use taxpayer dollars.

Jeffries claimed, without offering evidence, that the contributions may have been part of a broader effort to gain influence with the Trump administration.

“More likely, this is part of what Donald Trump has been doing since day one of his presidency: running the largest pay-to-play scheme in the history of the country. And probably soliciting donations from people who’ve got business before the United States government,” Jeffries said.

He continued, “And all of this is going to have to be investigated. It will. All of this will have to be uncovered. It will. And these people are going to be held accountable, no matter how long it takes. And that’s a warning to all of these people participating in this scheming to manipulate taxpayer dollars and, of course, to destroy the people’s house. The White House belongs to the American people. It doesn’t belong to Donald Trump.”

President Trump’s White House ballroom project was announced earlier this year as a privately financed addition to host official functions and events. The planned structure, located on the East Wing overhang, does not affect either the West Wing or the residential quarters.

Administration officials confirmed that the addition will remain part of the White House for future presidents.

Despite that, Jeffries’ remarks drew sharp backlash from conservatives who accused him of threatening private citizens for making lawful contributions.

Supporters of the project noted that similar upgrades and restorations have taken place under previous administrations from both parties.

The controversy over Jeffries’ comments adds to a growing list of disputes between Democratic leaders and Republican officials over the use of investigative power.

With multiple Democratic figures now facing scrutiny of their own — including Attorney General Letitia James — the party’s aggressive legal posture toward political opponents is once again under examination.

As investigations and counter-investigations continue, both parties are positioning for the next election cycle, where questions about the politicization of law enforcement are expected to remain a central issue.

Adam Schiff Under DOJ Investigation for Mortgage Fraud, Case Reportedly Stalled
News

Adam Schiff Under DOJ Investigation for Mortgage Fraud, Case Reportedly Stalled

/

Federal prosecutors in Maryland are reportedly defending Democrat Sen. Adam Schiff as a long-running mortgage fraud investigation involving the California lawmaker has stalled, according to multiple sources familiar with the case.

Schiff, who previously represented California’s 30th Congressional District before being elected to the U.S. Senate in 2024, is under investigation for alleged mortgage fraud, specifically occupancy fraud, tied to a Maryland property he purchased with his wife in 2003.

Congressman Adam Schiff (R) speaks during House Judiciary Committee field hearing on New York City violent crimes at Javits Federal Building in New York City on April 17, 2023

The case stems from questions over whether Schiff falsely claimed that the property was his “primary residence” in order to secure favorable mortgage rates.

The Gateway Pundit’s Joe Hoft first reported on the allegations in April 2023. Later that summer, Fox News host Laura Ingraham reported that the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Maryland had opened an investigation into Schiff for possible charges related to the mortgage filings.

According to property and loan documents, Schiff purchased the home in 2003 and declared under oath that he and his wife would occupy it for at least 12 consecutive months as their primary residence.

Despite that claim, Schiff continued to vote in California elections and listed a Los Angeles condominium as his primary residence.

Records show that Schiff refinanced the Maryland property multiple times between 2009 and 2013, each time asserting that it remained his principal home.

In 2009, a House Ethics investigation reviewed the matter after questions were raised about Schiff’s residency status and tax filings. Schiff said the filing was a mistake and repaid the exempt Maryland taxes.

In recent months, prosecutors in Maryland have reportedly shared information with the media, claiming there is insufficient evidence to charge Schiff. NBC News reported this week that the federal probe “came to a standstill” after months of investigation.

Four individuals familiar with the case told the outlet that prosecutors have not gathered enough evidence to move forward with charges.

The case was originally referred to the Department of Justice by Housing Director Bill Pulte, who accused Schiff of falsifying bank documents and property records over a 16-year period.

Pulte alleged that Schiff’s repeated filings allowed him to secure lower mortgage rates reserved for primary residences.

President Donald Trump publicly criticized Schiff in June, calling for prosecution and sharing a signed affidavit from Schiff’s mortgage file.

“Adam Schiff is a THIEF! He should be prosecuted, just like they tried to prosecute me, and everyone else — The only difference is, WE WERE TOTALLY INNOCENT, IT WAS ALL A GIANT HOAX!”

President Trump posted on Truth Social, attaching a copy of Schiff’s notarized declaration identifying the Maryland house as his “principal residence.”

NBC’s report described a recent internal meeting between U.S. Attorney Kelly Hayes, who is overseeing the investigation, and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche.

Hayes reportedly told Blanche that the evidence collected so far was not strong enough to bring charges, though the Justice Department had not reached a final decision.

“No final decision has been made,” one source told NBC News. Another federal law enforcement official said the investigation “came to a standstill,” but could be reopened if new information is uncovered.

NBC’s Ken Dilanian also reported that Ed Martin, a senior Justice Department official, has pressed to keep the case open, despite Hayes’ skepticism about the evidence. However, Blanche later denied reports that the meeting took place, describing the claim as inaccurate.

The Justice Department has not issued an official statement on the status of the investigation, and Schiff’s office has declined to comment on ongoing legal matters. The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Maryland has likewise not confirmed whether the inquiry will continue or be formally closed.

The case remains under internal review. According to officials familiar with the process, prosecutors have been directed to gather additional documentation related to Schiff’s refinancing history and property records before making a final determination.

Pam Bondi Launches DOJ Investigations Into Pritzker, Pelosi, and Lightfoot
News

Pam Bondi Launches DOJ Investigations Into Pritzker, Pelosi, and Lightfoot

/

Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Thursday that the Department of Justice has opened investigations into Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), and former Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot for actions allegedly aimed at exposing and obstructing federal immigration agents during ongoing enforcement operations.

Bondi confirmed the investigations during an appearance on Fox News’ “Jesse Watters Primetime,” following recent remarks from Lightfoot about a new project intended to publicly identify U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents.

Washington D.C – January 15, 2025: Senate Judiciary Committee considers the nomination of Pamela Bondi for Attorney General.

Speaking to Fox 32 Chicago earlier this week, Lightfoot said her team was developing a digital platform to track and reveal agents’ alleged “criminal actions.”

“We want to create a centralized archive of all the purported criminal actions of ICE and CBP agents,” Lightfoot said. “We want to create a portal where what’s happening real time can be centralized and put out for the public to view.”

Bondi told Watters that the Justice Department had already sent Lightfoot a legal notice ordering her to preserve all relevant records connected to the creation of the database. She said the department is investigating possible violations of federal law, including endangerment and obstruction of justice.

“She will be getting a letter from us tomorrow to preserve anything that she’s done, as well to make sure that she’s not violating the law. It appears she is,” Bondi said. “You cannot disclose the identity of a federal agent, where they live, anything that could harm them.”

Washington,DC, United States, May 8 2025, Pam Bondi attends an event in the East room at the White House

The attorney general added that similar notices have been sent to other prominent Democrats believed to have coordinated or supported efforts to target federal law enforcement personnel.

“Pritzker? Same ballgame with him. Pelosi got a letter today from Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. So did Brooke Jenkins, that DA in San Francisco,” Bondi said.

“We told them, preserve your emails, preserve everything you have on this topic, because if you are telling people to arrest our ICE officers, our federal agents — you cannot do that. You’re impeding an investigation, and we will charge them if they think I won’t.”

Bondi said the Department of Justice is acting to protect federal law enforcement officers who continue to operate across the country despite ongoing disruptions caused by the government shutdown.

“They’re out there working nonstop, as you’re showing right now, during a shutdown,” she told Watters.

“These people are out there working to keep Californians safe, yet you’ve got Pelosi out there saying to obstruct their investigation, you can’t do it, and we’re going to investigate her now, as well as that DA. And Pritzker is on the list too, Jesse.”

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker has faced previous criticism for directing state officials to resist federal immigration enforcement. Earlier this year, Pritzker suggested that federal agents who conduct immigration operations in Illinois could be arrested under state law.

In addition, Chicago’s city council passed an ordinance restricting cooperation with federal immigration authorities, including attempts to prevent ICE from carrying out enforcement actions at specific city-designated “safe” locations.

California officials have made similar statements opposing federal enforcement activity. Pelosi said Wednesday that agents who operate within the state without local coordination could face “legal consequences.”

Bondi reiterated that such threats and actions violate federal law, which grants immigration agents the authority to enforce statutes nationwide.

The attorney general emphasized that any public disclosure of agents’ personal information — including names, addresses, or family details — constitutes a criminal offense under federal statutes protecting law enforcement personnel.

As of Thursday night, the Justice Department confirmed that preservation orders have been issued to multiple offices connected to the investigation.

Additional subpoenas are expected in the coming days as federal prosecutors review communications and directives tied to efforts to obstruct immigration operations.

America’s Military Bases Set to Fuel AI Revolution as Private Firms Eye Massive Expansion
News

America’s Military Bases Set to Fuel AI Revolution as Private Firms Eye Massive Expansion

/

As artificial intelligence rapidly changes the landscape of global technology, the United States is taking bold steps to remain at the very forefront of innovation.

The U.S. Air Force has announced a sweeping new initiative to lease out thousands of acres of land at five major bases to private companies for the construction of large-scale AI data centers.

This move stands as a testament to the nation’s ongoing commitment to technological leadership, economic growth, and a strong national defense.

On Tuesday, the Department of the Air Force published a public call for proposals to develop land it described as “underutilized” at Arnold Air Force Base in Tennessee, Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona, Edwards Air Force Base in California, Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey, and Robins Air Force Base in Georgia.

This announcement is more than just a real estate transaction; it signals an intentional shift in how the U.S. leverages its resources to keep pace with an ever-evolving digital world.

Robert Moriarty, the Air Force’s deputy assistant secretary for installations, summed up the mission by stating, “AI is transforming the modern world, and these data centers are crucial for America to remain at the forefront of innovation.”

This forward-thinking attitude, grounded in practical policy, reflects a deep understanding that technological superiority is inseparable from national security and prosperity.

This initiative is not happening in a vacuum.

The Air Force’s decision comes on the heels of executive orders issued by President Donald Trump in January and July.

These orders are designed to accelerate the adoption of AI technology across the nation and speed up the construction of the massive data centers required for such a leap forward.

The July executive order specifically instructs the Department of Defense to identify military sites suitable for data center infrastructure and to lease the land in a competitive process.

Therefore, this latest Air Force proposal stands as a direct response to presidential leadership that prioritizes America’s technological future.

In keeping with transparency, the Air Force clarified that these data centers would not be exclusive to military projects. Instead, an Air Force official explained, “This is an opportunity for outside organizations.”

By opening up the bidding process to private companies, the Air Force is encouraging private sector investment and expertise while maintaining a firm grip on oversight and security standards.

This partnership between public and private sectors is precisely the type of innovative thinking that strengthens the nation’s infrastructure and protects American interests.

Private companies interested in this ambitious opportunity must submit their proposals by November 14, with selections scheduled for January of next year.

Following this, the Air Force will conduct thorough environmental assessments before any designs are finalized.

The scope of this effort is substantial, with the lease proposal covering about 3,100 acres across the five bases.

Notably, more than 2,100 of those acres are located at Edwards Air Force Base in California, an installation famous for cutting-edge aircraft testing, including platforms like the B-21 Raider bomber and the T-7 Red Hawk trainer.

The requirements are rigorous, as befits a project of this scale and importance. Each proposal must involve a project demanding more than 100 megawatts of new electrical load and represent a minimum investment of $500 million.

The leases themselves will not exceed 50 years unless there is a compelling national defense benefit to a longer agreement.

By setting such high standards, the Air Force ensures that only serious, well-capitalized players will shape this new chapter in American technological achievement.

Because the national security landscape continues to evolve, it is critical that the United States remains vigilant, proactive, and competitive. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s leadership has been crucial in supporting this strategic pivot.

The willingness to open underutilized military land to private AI development demonstrates not only fiscal responsibility but also a keen sense of how to leverage American ingenuity. This approach strengthens both military readiness and the broader U.S. economy at the same time.

The Air Force’s invitation to private companies to develop AI data centers on its bases is about more than just technology. It is about ensuring that America remains the world’s beacon of innovation and strength.

With determined leadership and a clear vision for the future, this initiative is poised to deliver profound benefits for the nation, securing both prosperity and security for generations to come.

Virginia Lt. Gov. Candidate Says She Doesn’t ‘Really Care’ About Sexually Explicit Books in Schools
News

Virginia Lt. Gov. Candidate Says She Doesn’t ‘Really Care’ About Sexually Explicit Books in Schools

/

Democratic Virginia state senator and lieutenant governor candidate Ghazala Hashmi is facing renewed scrutiny after comments resurfaced from a 2023 committee meeting in which she said she doesn’t “really care” about sexually explicit materials being available to children in public schools.

Hashmi made the remarks during a Public Education Subcommittee meeting on Senate Bill 1463, legislation that would require all public and school libraries in Virginia to place parental advisory labels on books containing sexually explicit content accessible to minors.

The measure was introduced to give parents more visibility into the type of material their children could access in school libraries.

“We seem to focus on sexual explicit material. I don’t really care about that,” Hashmi said during the meeting.

The bill, sponsored by Republican lawmakers, aimed to provide parents with a clearer system for identifying age-appropriate material. Hashmi’s remarks came after a discussion between members of the committee about how to best balance parental involvement with library autonomy.

During the hearing, Republican state Sen. Amanda Chase referenced a similar proposal that would require schools to label or flag books with explicit sexual content. The intention, Chase said, was to help parents — especially those with multiple children — monitor reading materials more easily.

“Many parents don’t have time to review every book their kids bring home,” Chase said, adding that advisory labels would give families a simple and effective tool to protect minors from inappropriate content.

Representatives from the Virginia School Librarians Association and the Virginia Library Association spoke against the bill, arguing that it would undermine professional discretion and impose unnecessary restrictions.

They maintained that it is ultimately parents’ responsibility to oversee what their children read.

Chase pressed the point that most parents expect schools to provide safe, age-appropriate materials. Before she could continue, Hashmi interrupted, saying, “I think we won’t engage in a debate,” and moved to end further discussion.

She then thanked the Virginia Library Association for its input and invited others to speak in opposition. When no one did, she added her own remarks.

“I’ll just say one of my concerns is violence,” Hashmi said.

“We seem to focus on sexual explicit material. I don’t really care about that; I care about the gratuitous violence that children are exposed to — not necessarily through books, but through all of the other social media. I think that does far greater harm to our children.”

The Hashmi campaign did not respond to the Daily Caller’s request for comment about her statement.

The resurfaced remarks have drawn attention as the lieutenant governor’s race intensifies. Republican nominee John Reid seized on the issue this week, staging a mock debate that featured an AI-generated stand-in for Hashmi after he said she repeatedly declined to debate him in person.

Hashmi’s campaign released a new television and digital ad on Tuesday accusing Reid of planning to “close public schools” and divert taxpayer funds to private education programs. Reid called the ad “false,” saying Hashmi was “misrepresenting his record” and avoiding public accountability.

Senate Bill 1463 remains part of a broader debate in Virginia over parental involvement in education and access to sexually explicit materials in public schools.

The issue gained momentum after several Virginia school districts drew criticism for stocking books with graphic sexual content, prompting some parents to call for stricter oversight.

Hashmi’s 2023 comments have reignited that discussion ahead of the November election, as voters weigh candidates’ positions on transparency, parental rights, and educational standards across the state.

Shots Fired After U-HAUL Truck Rams into California Coast Guard Base
News

Shots Fired After U-HAUL Truck Rams into California Coast Guard Base

/

In a dramatic turn of events Thursday night, a driver used a U-Haul truck in an apparent attempt to ram through the gates of Coast Guard Base Alameda, a critical facility in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Law enforcement officers responded decisively, opening fire and wounding the suspect after multiple verbal warnings were ignored.

The incident, which authorities say appears isolated, has quickly reignited debate over public safety and the role of federal agencies in America’s cities.

According to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the driver deliberately “attempted to weaponize the vehicle to ram into Coast Guard Base Alameda.”

The threat was so immediate that, as the statement notes, “when the vehicle’s actions posed a direct threat to the safety of Coast Guard and security personnel, law enforcement officers discharged several rounds of defensive live fire.”

The suspect, wounded in the stomach, was taken into custody for a mental health evaluation and is expected to survive. Fortunately, no Coast Guard personnel were injured during the incident. A bystander, struck by a fragment, was treated at a local hospital and released shortly thereafter.

FBI spokesperson Cameron Polan stated, “At this time, the incident appears to be isolated, and there is no known current threat to the public.” This assurance is vital because, in an age of heightened security concerns, any attack on a federal base rightfully raises alarm.

Video from the scene captured the tense moments as the U-Haul truck accelerated backwards, crashing into the base’s perimeter.

U-Haul’s spokesperson, Jeff Lockridge, emphasized the company’s cooperation with authorities: “U-Haul is assisting law enforcement to meet any investigative needs they have.” The FBI is currently leading the investigation, seeking clarity on the motives behind the failed attack.

This shocking event unfolded against the backdrop of significant political and social tension in the Bay Area. Earlier that same day, protesters gathered outside the base, holding signs that read “Protect our neighbors” and “No ICE or troops in the Bay.”

Many sang hymns, expressing strong opposition to any ramp-up of federal immigration enforcement, including the presence of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the National Guard.

These protests were sparked by the arrival of U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents at the base for what was described as a possible increase in immigration enforcement operations.

Hours prior to the incident, President Donald Trump—known for his firm stance on law and order—had called off a planned surge of federal agents into San Francisco.

Trump’s decision came after conversations with San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie and business leaders who insisted they were making progress in cleaning up the city.

This marked a clear contrast with earlier moments in his administration when he sent federal resources into other Democrat-led cities despite resistance from local officials.

The deployment of National Guard troops on American streets continues to be a contentious issue, facing ongoing legal battles in Washington, West Virginia, and Oregon.

Many Americans, however, have voiced support for the federal government’s efforts to restore order and reinforce the safety of law-abiding citizens.

As federal officials like Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have emphasized, maintaining security at vital installations like Coast Guard Base Alameda is a national priority.

Their leadership underscores the importance of decisive action in moments of crisis, putting public safety above all else.

Coast Guard Island itself is a secure, 67-acre artificial island situated in the Oakland Estuary. Federally owned and strictly off-limits to the general public without proper government credentials, it has been the home of Base Alameda since 2012.

This facility serves as a crucial support hub for Coast Guard operations along the West Coast, underscoring the seriousness of any security breach at its gates.

As the dust settles, many are left reflecting on the day’s events. On one hand, the swift and coordinated response by law enforcement ensured the safety of everyone inside the base, demonstrating the value of clear-headed leadership and robust security measures.

On the other, the presence of protests and the incident itself highlight ongoing disagreements over the best way to secure our communities while respecting civil liberties.

In the end, this incident serves as a reminder that, while the nation may be divided on many issues, the commitment to safeguarding American lives and critical infrastructure must remain a bipartisan priority.

The response from federal officers and leadership alike sends a clear message: when threats arise, America stands ready to defend itself, thanks to the brave men and women who serve and the leaders who back them.

WATCH BELOW:


Scroll to Top