News

CNN’s token conservative voice, Scott Jennings, reality-checked Democrats who are fearmongering about ongoing Trump’s mass deportations. The left has been lying to American citizens, telling them that they could be picked up on the streets and deported to some of the most brutal prisons in El Salvador.

One such fearmonger, civil and criminal attorney Donte Mills, appeared on CNN’s show alongside Jennings and attempted to perpetuate the same narrative. He claimed that the administration could deport American citizens by accident and that “it could happen to anybody,” allowing the former special assistant for George W. Bush to educate him. 

Jennings started reminding Mills that American voters gave Trump the mandate to deport illegal immigrants. Trump campaigned on border security and promised to conduct the largest mass deportations in history, making illegal immigration a losing issue for Democrats.

“Americans overwhelmingly voted for it. And it’s not particularly a controversial matter,” Jennings set the record straight.

“And that’s what the administration clearly communicated to the American people in the election.”

“They overwhelmingly voted for it. And it’s not particularly a controversial matter.”

ABSOLUTE DEMOLITION: Scott Jennings just wrecked a woke civil rights attorney on live TV—exposing the twisted logic behind the left’s obsession with protecting criminals.

Donte Mills launched into the usual fear-mongering over Trump’s deportation policy:

“It can happen to… pic.twitter.com/8OZeprQKUt

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) April 8, 2025

He also schooled the leftie on the differences between illegal immigrants and legal citizens, which Democrats attempt to blur to push their false narrative.

“You’re conflating legal American citizens with people who came here illegally. We do this all the time in these debates.”

“I think what the administration is trying to do is be as aggressive as possible at deporting different kinds of populations. 

“One, people who’ve committed heinous, violent crimes. Number two, people that were violent before they came here.”

According to a recent Pew Research Center study, an overwhelming majority (97%) of Americans support deporting violent illegal immigrants. Two-thirds of Americans, including half of Democrats, also support deporting all illegal immigrants in the country.

“Number three, anyone who came here illegally, I mean, look, I’m sorry, but if you came here illegally, no matter how well-intentioned you were, there’s probably a decent chance you’re going to be sent back,” Jennings continued.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt had schooled journalists that anybody who entered the country illegally was a criminal and subject to deportation because the Trump administration was focused on enforcing all laws, including immigration laws.

“And if you are an individual, a foreign national, who illegally enters the United States of America, you are, by definition, a criminal,” she stated.

However, the Trump administration started by deporting the most violent criminals, whom the Democrats characterized as innocent undocumented individuals looking for better opportunities, such as crop pickers. 

Liberal judge James Boasberg even ordered the Trump administration to return Tren de Aragua gang members into the country, against the wishes of most Americans. However, the Supreme Court blocked the restraining order given by the liberal judge, whose articles of impeachment were filed in the Senate. 

Democrats also overwhelmingly voted against the Laken Riley Act, which aims to protect Americans’ lives by detaining illegal immigrants who are arrested, charged, or convicted for various crimes, such as burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting, to prevent them from being released on the streets and committing even more grievous crimes. 

The law was inspired by Laken Riley, a nursing student who was murdered by a violent illegal immigrant, arrested for various crimes, and released due to lack of similar laws allowing the detention of illegal immigrants undergoing prosecution.

Despite Americans clearly stating that they want to secure their country, Democrats are undoubtedly siding with criminals instead of Americans who elected them.

RINO Congressman Rep. Don Bacon announced on Sunday that he will introduce new legislation to block President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs on countries that have taken advantage of the United States.

On Wednesday, Trump announced the implementation of a 10% baseline tariff on all imports, and the worst offenders will be hit with even tougher measures.

The president proclaimed April 2 as “Liberation Day,” which will restore America’s economic independence, vitalize domestic manufacturing, and protect American jobs.

Trump also released a detailed chart that showed how American workers were being ripped off.

Bacon told CBS anchor Margaret Brennan that he will now introduce a new bill to halt Trump’s tariff agenda, modeled on legislation introduced by Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and far-left Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA).

The Grassley-Cantwell bill requires Trump to notify Congress within 48 hours of imposing new tariffs and present a detailed rationale and analysis of the potential consequences for businesses and consumers.

The legislation will also require Congress to approve all tariffs within 60 days, or they will automatically expire.

“I support the legislation that Senator Grassley and Senator Cantwell (introduced),” Bacon told Brennan.

“I have some support on the House bill, which we will unveil tomorrow.”

Watch:

Bacon acknowledged that getting the bill through the House would face challenges, as House Speaker Mike Johnson is supporting Trump on tariffs.

However, Bacon is betting on Trump’s tariffs causing the markets to surge while inflation and unemployment could rise.

Bacon says if this happens, his bill will become “very viable.”

“It will be harder to pass this in the House, no doubt,” he stated.

“But if we get 60 votes in the Senate, it will pressure the House to look at this (bill).”

“If we continue to see the stock market go a certain direction or if we see inflation or unemployment shift in a bad way, this becomes a very viable bill,” he added.

“It will not pass tomorrow… But this will be in the queue we can use.”

Visit The Daily Fetched for more stories like this.

Former President Obama attempted some cheap shots at President Donald Trump at Hamilton College this week, which spectacularly backfired.

While he appeared to be pushing Democrat and media talking points, he also failed to realize that many within the MAGA movement remember his presidency.

NBC News reports:

Former President Barack Obama said he is “deeply concerned” with some of the actions that President Donald Trump and his administration have taken and seemed to call out the Republican Party for not pushing back on them…

Obama said he’s more troubled by a White House that takes aim at law firms that represent ideas or parties that its occupants disagree with, and that the administration has punished media outlets. Trump has signed executive orders penalizing major law firms and lawyers, prompting outrage within the legal community. The White House has also barred The Associated Press from coverage over its refusal to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America.

“That kind of behavior is contrary to the basic compact we have as Americans,” he said.

Obama suggested that Republicans would be outraged if he had done similar things as president.

“Imagine if I had pulled Fox News’ credentials from the White House press corps,” he said, adding, “It’s unimaginable that the same parties that are silent now would have tolerated behavior like that from me or a whole bunch of my predecessors.”

Watch:

Obama: Imagine if I had done any of this. Imagine if I had pulled Fox News’ credentials from the White House press corps. Imagine if I had said to law firms that were representing parties that were upset with policies my administration had initiated, that you will not be allowed… pic.twitter.com/htecKDCbyi

— Acyn (@Acyn) April 4, 2025

Reactions:

Obama’s DOJ and Eric Holder only spied on then-Fox correspondent James Rosen, secretly seized AP phone records and rejected more FOIA requests than any administration in history.

Otherwise, great post. https://t.co/xC2BESdu5O

— Joe Concha (@JoeConchaTV) April 5, 2025

Obama DID try and bar Fox News from a WH Press Pool. And he DID use the IRS to go after Tea Party organizations who campaigned against ObamaCare. Not to mention, he used the FBI to spy on Trump.

In what alternate reality do these people operate in? https://t.co/4dlB4GuFTC

— Bluesky Libs (@BlueskyLibs) April 5, 2025

No need to imagine—Obama did something worse than any president in history. He used the full weight of the federal government to orchestrate a smear campaign framing his successor as a Russian agent. It remains the most disgraceful abuse of power in modern American politics. https://t.co/X5EIPwZwGY

— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) April 5, 2025

Visit The Daily Fetched for more articles like this.

A U.S. District Judge in Lansing, Michigan, has ruled in favor of a white ex-IBM employee to allow a racial and gender discrimination lawsuit to proceed. Judge Hala Jarbou, a Trump appointee, said the plaintiff, Randall Dill, had provided sufficient grounds to sustain the case.

Dill alleges that he was terminated from his position to accommodate more employees from minority backgrounds to attain the company’s diversity goals. 

The lawsuit stated that IBM’s CEO and Board Chairman, Arvind Krishna, allegedly directed all executives “to move forward by 1% on both underrepresented minorities.” His objective was to have female employees account for 50% of the workforce and increase the percentage of Black employees to 13% and Hispanics to the “mid-teens.”

IBM executives, including Dill’s immediate supervisor, Zook, and Kevin Henning, Zook’s supervisor, stood to gain financially from achieving DEI goals or lose their bonuses or even employment on failure.

According to the lawsuit, the “quota system is tied to bonus compensation in such a way that it incentivizes impermissible racial discrimination and disincentivizes refusal to engage in such discrimination.”

Dill says his supervisors used various ploys to terminate his employment to achieve diversity goals by increasing the percentage of minority employees. 

He claims that, despite his clients rating him highly, he was put on a performance improvement program typically reserved for underperforming employees. The program was based on a client rating system with an average score of 8 out of 10 considered satisfactory. Dill’s clients frequently rated him no less than 9 out of 10.

Yet, his supervisors blamed him for a “low-utilization rate” and failing to enroll more clients, which was beyond his control “as he could not control whether IBM signed a new client or whether one of its existing clients chose Dill as its consultant.” His situation was also not unusual, as half of the employees in his division were on the bench.

“Dill alleges grounds for believing that his managers were, in fact, motivated by improper reasons. He alleges that they had financial incentives to terminate a white male employee like himself in order to alter the racial and gender composition of his division in accordance with IBM’s Diversity Policy,” the lawsuit states.

However, IBM denied the allegations and requested the judge to dismiss the case for failure to state a claim, arguing that Dill had failed to identify other employees in similar situations who were treated differently. 

Nonetheless, the court denied IBM’s motion for dismissal, stating that “Dill has provided enough facts to state viable race and gender discrimination claims against IBM.”

“Taken as true, Dill’s allegations plausibly support an inference that IBM improperly considers race or gender as a factor in employment-related decisions,” Jarbou stated.

However, IBM publicly denied the allegations, terming them as baseless.

“These allegations are baseless, as neither race nor gender played any role in the decision to end this individual’s employment with IBM,” the company said.

Dill is represented by America First Legal, founded by the former senior advisor to President Trump, Stephen Miller.

“We look forward to continuing to litigate this case and fight for justice on behalf of our client,” said America First Legal’s attorney, Andrew Block.

Talk show host Dr. Phil found himself in an awkward position after hosting a transgender activist who lashed out after he demonstrated that female transgender athletes, biological males who identify as women, have physical advantages over biological females.

The veteran talk show titan hosted a trans activist named Blossom, who was born a man but currently identifies as a woman. The woke activist had previously recommended having gender neutral Olympics and merging paralympics with regular Olympics.

"Blossom", who identifies as a "black transgender woman", says that Olympic athletes should compete with Paralympic athletes. pic.twitter.com/tT1mGPLJRH

— Thomas Sowell Quotes (@ThomasSowell) February 21, 2025

This time, he managed to make an intellectual argument, claiming that even people of the same biological sex have various physical advantages over each other, including bone density, adding that the “perceived” advantage is based on a statistically small transgender population.

He also opposed subjecting women to gender confirmation tests to prove that they were biologically female. So far, no biological female athlete has opposed gender tests. Yet, Democrats continue to claim that they are degrading to women. 

“I think it’s very dangerous when we put all women in a position to be tested to prove that they’re not trans, and that executive order that Donald Trump signed is nothing more than waste and fraud, in my opinion,” the trans activist stated.

“You’re only signing for 0.002% of the population. You are subjecting all women, whether they’re cis or trans, to rigorous tests to prove that they are not trans in order for them to play,” Blossom added.

However, Dr. Phil would have none of that by pointing out that the percentages do not matter when individual trans athletes are erasing years of hard work within minutes. By October 2024, trans athletes had won over 900 medals in women’s sports and displaced over 600 biological female athletes. In contrast, almost no woman who identifies as a man has won any medal in male sports.

Trans athlete Lia Thomas was ranked over 400 in men’s 500-yard freestyle and over 500 in other events. Yet, he managed to smash the women’s record in the same race when he transitioned and competed as a woman. Similarly, transgender cyclist Austin Killips beat the biological female runners-up in the Tour of the Gila in New Mexico cycling race by a whopping 50 minutes and 25 seconds. These extraordinary victories by trans athletes who performed poorly in men’s sports are hardly coincidental.

“I don’t think it’s so much the number of trans athletes, because there can be one athlete that can come into a conference like the Big Sky Conference, for example, and when they come into the Big Sky Conference, that one athlete can really erase a lot of really hard work and devotion and sacrifice that dozens, hundreds of women have spent years working on to achieve athletic heights,” Dr. Phil said.

He proceeded to point out that biological men’s advantage over biological women was “not a matter of opinion” by demonstrating that, on average, biological men have superior grip strength, superior total upper body strength, and higher vertical jumps. However, his statements seemed to trigger the transgender athlete, prompting them to lash out.

Dr Phil v Blossom the trans activist. 🤡#WhenIdeologyMeetsReality pic.twitter.com/rrvjmt99z8

— Biology Rules Ok (@OkayBiology) April 4, 2025

“Respectfully Dr. Phil, I’m gonna need you to have several seats. Let’s be clear, trans women, again, are women,” Blossom fumed. 

“What you’re showing me are male statistics and trans women are not males. Everything that I say can actually be proven, it’s scientifically proven, and I would inquire you to do research on what you’re saying, because again it’s almost like you’re trying to call trans-women men and that is not what trans-women are.”

Daring Dr. Phil to provide statistics on transgender vs biological female athletes, the trans activist accused the talk show host of spreading “conservative propaganda” and drinking “the Kool-Aid.” 

“Trans-women work just as hard as women to compete,” Blossom added.

Evidently, the record speaks for itself when almost all transgender female athletes dominate women’s sports, while transgender male athletes have so far failed to win any medals or set records in men’s sports.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other key public health agencies are undergoing major leadership and structural changes following recent moves by the Trump administration and Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

The shake-up includes mass layoffs, agency leadership resignations, and public disputes over federal drug approval policies and vaccine regulation.

Earlier this week, HHS confirmed a reduction of 20,000 positions, accounting for approximately 24% of its workforce. As part of the restructuring, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) reportedly placed five agency chiefs on administrative leave Monday.

Among those affected are leaders from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

These divisions have come under scrutiny for past research funding decisions, including grants related to Chinese labs and controversial gender research.

New NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, who was sworn in on Tuesday, informed staff in an internal email that the reorganization would require changes to the agency’s approach in areas such as communications, legislative affairs, procurement, and human resources.

He emphasized priorities like scientific transparency and academic freedom. NIH’s Deputy Director of Public Affairs, Amanda Fine, directed media outlets to file Freedom of Information Act requests to access the email, calling it an “official record.”

“I don’t want retribution. What I want is for gold standard science to happen, and that means even people who disagree with me should have their say. We will never use this agency to censor scientists who disagree.”@DrJBhattacharya pic.twitter.com/oKkcz8wywG

— Daniel Kotzin (@DanielKotzin) April 2, 2025

Nature reported that some of the NIH and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) staff were offered reassignment to the Indian Health Service.

NOTUS also confirmed that CDC officials had received similar transfer offers, particularly relocating away from the agency’s main office in Atlanta.

At the FDA, significant changes have drawn attention from the pharmaceutical industry.

Former FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, who served in the Obama and Biden administrations and later worked in a strategic role for Google’s parent company Alphabet, wrote on LinkedIn that the agency “as we’ve known it is finished.”

He warned that a loss of experienced leadership could affect drug development and public safety.

Califf’s departure follows that of other top officials. Peter Marks, Director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), resigned last week.

Politico and the Associated Press reported that Marks was given the option to resign or be dismissed by Secretary Kennedy, with the approval of newly installed FDA Commissioner Marty Makary.

Marks’ March 28 resignation letter, addressed to acting Commissioner Sara Brenner, cited concerns about misinformation but did not mention the ultimatum.

JUST IN: FDA’s top vaccine official, Peter Marks, has resigned!

Sources are saying RFK Jr. forced him out.

Another MAHA victory 🔥 pic.twitter.com/MiKga1eOBC

— Died Suddenly (@DiedSuddenly_) March 29, 2025

Makary, whose swearing-in date was not specified in the FDA’s April 1 press release, has already made staffing changes.

On Wednesday, Danish-American vaccine safety researcher Tracy Beth Hoeg confirmed she was hired as a special assistant to Makary. Hoeg has publicly criticized federal COVID-19 research and vaccine policies, including the U.S. childhood immunization schedule.

Marks’ departure coincided with a sharp decline in the stock prices of several biotech firms. Companies like Moderna, Beam Therapeutics, and Sarepta Therapeutics saw significant single-day losses, according to the Wall Street Journal.

These companies are heavily invested in mRNA and gene therapy technologies, areas that Marks previously supported.

University of California San Francisco epidemiologist Vinay Prasad criticized Marks’ leadership, citing repeated approval of COVID-19 boosters for infants without randomized clinical trial data.

Stanford professor George Tidmarsh echoed those concerns, accusing Marks of prioritizing pharmaceutical industry interests over patient safety.

Both cited controversial FDA decisions, including the approval of aducanumab, an Alzheimer’s drug that has since been withdrawn. Critics argue it was authorized without adequate evidence and based on disputed scientific theories.

Bhattacharya raised similar concerns about NIH’s approach to Alzheimer’s research during his Senate confirmation hearing.

The broader restructuring of public health agencies comes amid increased scrutiny of federal science policy, pharmaceutical regulation, and administrative spending.

The administration has also moved to reduce indirect-cost payments on federal research grants, a policy that critics say disproportionately benefits institutional administrators over researchers.

The White House has not yet provided an official timeline for the full implementation of the staffing changes. Additional reassignments, restructuring, and appointments are expected in the coming weeks.

Visit RVM News for more articles like this.

President Donald Trump on Thursday suggested that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) had made a shocking discovery while praising Elon Musk‘s work under the agency.

The President was asked how long Musk would stay on board with the administration as a “special government employee,” and he responded, “Elon is fantastic. He’s a patriot.”

Trump added that Musk is allowed to stay “as long as he’d like,” while the commander-in-chief himself would prefer that he remain “as long as possible.”

“I like smart people, and he’s a smart person. I also like him, personally,” Trump commented.

“We’re in no rush. But there will be a point at which time Elon’s going to have to leave.”

Watch:

🚨President Trump on DOGE:

“They found something today that is horrible. It is horrible. You will find out very soon. What they found is incredible."

What do you think has been found? pic.twitter.com/roLj40cuNH

— DOGE NEWS- Department of Government Efficiency (@realdogeusa) April 3, 2025

The President said DOGE’s work under Musk’s leadership is especially important, notably due to the recent discovery made earlier on Thursday.

“They found something today that is horrible. It is horrible,” Trump said.

“You will find out very soon. What they found is incredible.”

However, Trump did not reveal any further details about what they had found.

“Special government employees” like Musk are only allowed to work for the federal government for up to 130 days in a 365-day period, meaning the Tesla CEO’s time for the year would expire on May 30.

However, Trump floated the idea of appointing Musk to a more formal position, adding that “the secretaries” in his Cabinet are expected to take over the government efficiency effort once Musk departs.

“I’d keep him as long as I can keep him,” Trump said earlier this week, per Fox News.

“He’s a very talented guy. You know, I love very smart people. He’s very smart. And he’s done a good job.”

Trump’s remarks came after a false report from Politico claimed Musk would imminently leave the White House over frictions within the Trump team.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt later responded to the report, calling it “garbage” on social media.

“Elon Musk and President Trump have both publicly stated that Elon will depart from public service as a special government employee when his incredible work at DOGE is complete,” she said.

Trump confirmed that DOGE would remain in place until July 4, 2026, the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.

Visit The Daily Fetched for more articles like this.

Elon Musk isn’t going rogue, and he’s certainly not being pushed out. Despite desperate attempts by left-leaning outlets like Politico to stir up drama, Musk’s tenure with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is unfolding exactly as planned, as reported by Fox News.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt shut down the latest media rumor mill on Wednesday after Politico claimed President Trump had supposedly told confidants that Musk would be “stepping back” in the coming weeks.

Image Credit:https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/washington-february-22-2025-white-house-2589320081

According to Leavitt, there’s no scoop here—just spin.

“This ‘scoop’ is garbage. Elon Musk and President Trump have both publicly stated that Elon will depart from public service as a special government employee when his incredible work at DOGE is complete.”

This “scoop” is garbage.

Elon Musk and President Trump have both *publicly* stated that Elon will depart from public service as a special government employee when his incredible work at DOGE is complete. https://t.co/Brppff6SKi

— Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) April 2, 2025

This is not breaking news. Musk’s appointment was always temporary.

President Trump brought Musk aboard as a “special government employee” under a federal provision that permits temporary assignments lasting no more than 130 days within a 365-day period. Musk’s clock started ticking on Inauguration Day—January 20—and it runs out May 30.

Since taking on the role, Musk has led DOGE with the kind of innovation and urgency that the D.C. swamp has sorely lacked. With a goal to slash a trillion dollars in government waste, the initiative has already delivered tangible results.

President Trump signed the executive order forming DOGE to streamline bloated bureaucracies, and Musk jumped in with characteristic boldness.

During a Thursday interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier, Musk stayed on message. Asked whether he’d stick around past the 130-day limit, Musk replied, “I think we will have accomplished most of the work required to reduce the deficit by a trillion dollars within that time frame.”

Watch the full interview here:

If you have thirty minutes, you can watch Bret Baier's full interview with Elon Musk right here on 𝕏. pic.twitter.com/bLO2LcDeop

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) March 27, 2025

President Trump also weighed in on Musk’s future, hinting that while he’d love to keep the Tesla and SpaceX chief around, he understands the limits.

“I think he’s amazing. But I also think he’s got a big company to run. I’d keep him as long as I can keep him. He’s a very talented guy. You know, I love very smart people. He’s very smart. And he’s done a good job.”

🚨 President Trump on Elon Musk & DOGE:

"I think Elon is amazing but I also think he got a big company to run, so at some point he's going to be going back. He's a very talented guy. He's very smart and has done a good job. DOGE found numbers that nobody can even believe like… pic.twitter.com/0qd2vFaR7R

— DogeDesigner (@cb_doge) March 31, 2025

As usual, legacy media outlets are less interested in facts and more focused on misleading narratives. White House spokesman Harrison Fields didn’t hold back:

“Politico has become a tabloid paper that would rather run fake news for clicks than real reporting. This is exactly why President Trump and DOGE have terminated millions of dollars in wasteful, government contracts to so-called news organizations that have diminished their credibility with the American people.”

.@politico has become a tabloid paper that would rather run fake news for clicks than real reporting. This is exactly why @POTUS and @DOGE have terminated millions of dollars in wasteful, government contracts to so-called news organizations that have diminished their credibility… https://t.co/PUhh66AEdi

— Harrison Fields (@HFields47) April 2, 2025

Musk’s departure isn’t scandalous. It’s the conclusion of a mission that was designed to be short-term, effective, and impactful. Washington isn’t used to efficiency—but DOGE, under Musk’s leadership, is delivering just that.

Visit Drew Berquist.com for more stories like this.

Image Credit: © Jack Gruber, Jack Gruber / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

During a tele-town hall with Wisconsin voters Monday night, Elon Musk revealed that an arrest is expected in connection to a major Social Security fraud operation involving the stolen identities of over 400,000 Americans.

The fraud, Musk alleged, is part of a broader effort that includes the exploitation of U.S. welfare systems and voter rolls by illegal immigrants.

Musk made the remarks while addressing voters in Wisconsin, responding to a question from a caller in Pulaski who asked whether the fraud uncovered in the Social Security system would be prosecuted.

“Yes. In fact, I believe someone is going to be arrested tomorrow,” Musk said.

“This is someone who actually stole 400,000 Social Security numbers and personal information from the Social Security database, and was selling Social Security numbers and all the identification information in order for people to basically steal money from Social Security.”

Musk said the method of fraud has far-reaching implications, including misuse of government benefits and unauthorized participation in the U.S. election system.

“This is a particular avenue of fraud for illegal immigrants and for voter fraud, because the main way that identification is established in the United States is via Social Security,” Musk explained.

“So if you compromise the Social Security system, you can basically get people de facto registered to vote, even if they’re not citizens, and to get a bunch of benefits and milk the system. It’s pretty insane.”

He criticized what he described as a deliberate effort to reshape the federal government’s infrastructure to support illegal immigration.

“The Democrats have basically taken every part of the government that could possibly be bent toward providing financial incentives for illegal immigrants to come to and remain in the United States—whether it’s Social Security, disability, Medicare, unemployment, even IRS refunds without any income,” Musk said.

“It’s wild.”

Musk also pointed to the misuse of emergency relief funds. “They diverted FEMA funds—which are supposed to be for helping Americans in distress from natural disasters—to pay for luxury hotels in New York for illegals to stay in. In fact, they’re still there.”

JUST IN: @ElonMusk announces that people will start being arrested for committing fraud against the American people.

"Someone is going to be arrested tomorrow. He actually stole 400,000 social security numbers & personal information from the Social Security database and was… pic.twitter.com/wD7SKwWOmy

— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) April 1, 2025

ELON MUSK: “It’s deciding what should be prosecuted first because it’s such a long list.”

“The wheels of justice turn slowly but surely… the person that stole 400,000 social security numbers.. will be arrested hopefully this week.”

Arrests are imminent ‼️🔥👇🏼 @elonmusk pic.twitter.com/JCZC8plaLB

— TONY™ (@TONYxTWO) April 2, 2025

Antonio Gracias, a senior figure within the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), also presented data during a previous town hall Sunday in Wisconsin that Musk referenced Monday night.

According to Gracias, the number of Social Security numbers issued to non-citizens surged from 270,000 in 2021 to over 2.1 million in 2024.

“We found 1.3 million of them already on Medicaid as an example,” Gracias said.

“On every benefit program we went through, we found groups from this particular group of people, 5.5 million people in those benefit programs. And then what was really, really disturbing us was why. We’re asking ourselves why. And so we actually just took a sample and looked at voter registration records, and we found people here registered to vote in this population.”

Gracias confirmed that the findings have been referred to federal investigators.

“We’ve referred them to prosecution at Homeland Security Investigations,” he said.

“That’s happening right now.”

Elon Musk and Antonio Gracias reveal shocking chart of new non-citizen Social Security Numbers issued.

“This is a mind blowing chart” pic.twitter.com/bJ6ZGw1AXh

— America (@america) March 31, 2025

Musk also addressed the larger issue of outdated federal infrastructure, calling it the “thorniest computer problem I’ve ever seen.”

He noted that many of the government’s systems are still running decades-old software, including long-delayed projects like the IRS modernization effort launched in 1995, which Musk criticized as being perpetually “five years away” from completion.

Elon Musk: “The government has got the thorniest computer problem I’ve ever seen. Thousands of systems—many of them are very, very old. Some of the software is older than me… these projects are just ridiculous—like the project to modernize the IRS system. It’s been going on… pic.twitter.com/6oh0l9OrSk

— America (@america) April 1, 2025

Officials have not publicly named the suspect allegedly behind the theft of 400,000 Social Security numbers.

Please visit RVM News for more stories like this.

Most people consider the early 90s MTV show “The Real World” (it launched in 1992) to have launched the reality television era. The show followed young adults as they left home and faced political, economic, and romantic realities on their own for the first time. As we all know, television gushed forth a glut of “reality” shows ever since, with most offerings upping the ante with rude, selfish, and abusive behavior among the cast members taking entertainment center stage. 

Entire generations of American kids grew up in the world of “reality TV.” To them, it’s always been normal to have a camera following ordinary people around indoors and out. Melodramatic and conniving behavior to friends and colleagues became an expected part of the plot; indeed, narcissism is the “drama” that viewers tune in for. It’s a chicken-egg question. Did the selfish diva behavior create reality TV, or did the TV create the behavior? 

It’s probably both. But whatever the answer, we’re living in a very strange world in 2025 where just about any bad behavior is seen as “camera ready.” Time was that stealing a video tape of a rocker and a hot actress having sex was seen as a scandal—Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee were angry and embarrassed when someone leaked their home video. That didn’t last long. Just over a decade later, a sex tape featuring then unknown Kim Kardashian and actor Ray J having sex was released by an adult video company. No one knows for sure, but there are allegations that Kardashian’s own mother leaked the tape to propel her daughter into super stardom. 

This cultural “evolution” may explain why so many criminals seem perfectly content not only to be caught on camera, but to film their own illegal activity for public applause. How else do we explain the brazen destruction of Tesla Motors dealerships by candy-poison-haired leftist activists? If you weren’t aware, the hard left has developed Elon Derangement Syndrome (Elon Musk, owner of Tesla) to complement their unbalanced obsession with Donald Trump. Angry, for some reason, at Musk’s attempts to cut federal government waste through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), these people are spray painting and setting Tesla facilities on fire in broad daylight, seemingly without a care in the world. 

Here’s one in Berlin, Germany:

A Tesla dealership in Berlin was spray painted by the same people claiming to fight fascism and stand for democracy.

What’s even funnier is the sign they were seen displaying said, “fight the alliance of the rich and fascists,” hmm, I wonder who funds them? pic.twitter.com/vVZiuoR07P

— Liberacrat™️ (@Liberacrat) April 1, 2025

As the X contributor Liberacrat wonders, is someone paying these criminal brats who claim to be fighting “rich fascists?”

Here’s another in Ottawa:

Ottawa climate group vandalizes Tesla pic.twitter.com/gvKUiZOnNj

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) April 1, 2025

Here’s another one. This woman is taking part in the latest craze–”keying” Teslas. That is, property damage against some innocent driver. 

Woman keys a Tesla Cybertruck on 2/17/2025 at 11:34 AM at the Festival Center (near TJ Maxx and Hobby Lobby) in Anaheim Hills, CA.

The vehicle owner has worked with the police but hasn’t been able to bring the vandal to justice.

Do you know this woman?pic.twitter.com/Fz9ByCTiDq

— Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 (@Bubblebathgirl) April 1, 2025

There are many more just like this if you care to look. 

Some of the vandalism has gone much farther than mere spray painting and scratching. Attorney General Pam Bondi recently announced that she’s charging the worst  of the perps with domestic terrorism. Cooper Frederick, 24, is charged with firebombing a Tesla dealership in Loveland, Colorado. He looks strangely surprised in his mugshot:

Good, give him 20 years minimum! pic.twitter.com/z9RhUTH8WH

— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) April 1, 2025

From the responses on X, the public is in no mood for light sentences. 

In gitmo

— TYLER™ (@AmericanVet0311) April 1, 2025

How about life ??

— Kumar Kesineni (@kesinenikumar) April 1, 2025

I hope they do give him 20 years. I just don’t believe it will ever happen. I bet he gets a slap on the wrist. With all the liberal judges and prosecutors out there, he might not even do anytime.

— Brian4,nsense (@BrianDCheek) April 1, 2025

30 years hard labor swinging a sledge hammer busting rocks since he has so much fun destroying others property.

— Charles McGhee (@Charles_McGhee_) April 1, 2025

Send him here👇🏻👇🏻 pic.twitter.com/qaNdATseqY

— Joey FAFO (@jkeeter82) April 1, 2025