Economics

Economics

Tractor Supply Says “No More Woke”

Conservatives love to use the phrase, “Go woke, go broke,” but too often it’s been more of a wish than a reality.

That may be changing.

For years—since at least 2015—corporations have eagerly adopted every leftist demand for “cultural change.” Environmental and Social Governance (ESG)? Check. Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI)? Check. Let men who claim to be women use the ladies’ room at the office? Check.

Despite protest from customers, companies have barreled ahead aiming at a spot to the left of Karl Marx. Any patron who didn’t like it was either ignored, or blamed for being insufficiently enthusiastic about the sexualization of children. Disney is famous, for example, for blaming the poor box office receipts for its offerings on “sexist” and bigoted audience members.

But in 2024, “go woke, go broke” is starting get closer to reality. Anheuser-Busch destroyed the Bud Light brand overnight when a former executive decided to team up with a crossdressing gay man to “celebrate” “diversity.” The company lost $27 billion in market value.

It looks like rural farm-supply chain Tractor Supply knows which way the wind is blowing and wants to stay out of the storm. Filmmaker Robbie Starbuck has been after the company for weeks for its spending on woke causes such as anything labeled “LGBTQ+”.

Tractor Supply’s customers were none too pleased to know their dollars were going to organizations that wanted to teach schoolchildren about “alternative” sexualities.

In a surprisingly frank turn-around, Tractor Supply just announced it’s dropping Woke. All of it. You can read the whole statement here.

The highlights? Tractor Supply won’t be cooperating with the LGBTQ pressure group Human Rights Campaign any longer, they won’t be sponsoring any pride festivals, and they’re not going to be spending on any more “non-business activities” unless those focus on farming, agriculture, animals, and veterans’ issues.

Reaction on social media has been overwhelmingly positive. Antiwoke muckraking account LibsofTikTok showed right up:

People appreciate the honest and candid approach the company took.

They’ve won back some customers who walked away, too.

But there’s always one or two die-hard activists making a sour face.

What do you think of Tractor Supply’s decision? Tell us in the comments.

Economics

Revisiting Some of Paul Krugman’s WORST Economic Predictions

In an amusing column following Joe Biden’s spectacular loss to Donald Trump in the first presidential debate, the New York Times’ chief hack Paul Krugman called Biden the best president of his adult life…. before asking him to step aside.

Even in the face of a performance like what we saw last night, Krugman’s hyperpartisanship prevents him from truly acknowledging that there’s anything wrong with Biden. When posting his post-debate article to twitter this morning, he captioned it “I really hated writing this.”

Oh, the horrors.

Always a staunch enemy of the GOP, Paul Krugman’s partisanship predates the “Trump Derangement Syndrome” we saw sweep the media. He was seemingly never vaccinated against TDS, Romney Derangement Syndrome, McCain Derangement Syndrome, Bush Derangement Syndrome, and the list goes on, and on, and on.

If Trump does win in November, which is now a statistical favorite, Krugman’s TDS may finally reach stage four.

During his presidency, Trump had personally blasted Krugman for losing all credibility with his “false and highly inaccurate writings,” and there’s no hyperbole there.

On the theme of Krugman being betrayed by his own partisan hackery, I thought it would be fun to compile some of his worst predictions over the years.

Here are just a few.

The Stock Market is Doomed Under Trump!

When it became clear that Donald Trump would win the presidential election late into the night on November 8th, 2016, the stock futures market initially panicked, with the Dow Jones shedding over 800 points.

Before the markets even had the chance to open the following day, Krugman took to his New York Times column to predict they would never recover. “It really does now look like President Donald J. Trump, and markets are plunging. When might we expect them to recover? … If the question is when markets will recover, a first-pass answer is never.”

The Dow closed up 250 points the next morning – and skyrocketed thereafter.

Admittedly I’m not sure how to calculate the margin of error on the difference between “never” and “the next day.”

The Trump stock market surge continued almost entirely uninterrupted during his presidency, with the only exception being at the beginning of 2020 due to a global pandemic. But despite even that, major indexes still closed out higher in 2020.

Krugman in 2017 – There Will Be No Return to 3% Growth

Appearing on the network Bloomberg in March 2017, Krugman expressed doubt that we’d be seeing a return to 3% economic growth under the Trump administration.

He reiterated the same point later in the year on Twitter, arguing that at it would be difficult to achieve 3% growth due to baby boomers leaving the workforce.

No surprise here: he was dead wrong.

Growth was 3.1% from the fourth quarter of 2017 in the fourth quarter of 2018. Even more impressive, the economy was only projected to grow 2% according to the baseline under Obama.

A Recession is Coming!

In February of 2019 Krugman predicted that a recession is coming “this year or next.”

It’s hard to give Krugman any credit for his predictive ability, because he been predicted a Trump recession every single year of his presidency.

Krugman had also dialed back the severity of his prediction. On election night Krugman predicted that Trump would throw the entire planet’s economy into a recession. He admitted in his February prediction “By the way, my track record for this is bad—as is everybody’s. No one is good at calling these turning points.”

Anyone can be a prophet when they make the same prediction every year, and Krugman was “technically” right in that there was a recession in 2020, though no one can put the blame for the Chinese virus that caused it on Trump (though they will try). Trump then oversaw the fastest recovery from a recession of that severity in U.S. history – which Krugman did not predict.

Nothing New

It’s not just under the Trump-era that the world’s most arrogant economist has butchered his predictions.

In 1998, Krugman dismissed the rise of the internet’s popularity and its eventual economic effects: “The growth of the Internet will slow drastically, as the flaw in ‘Metcalfe’s law’–which states that the number of potential connections in a network is proportional to the square of the number of participants–becomes apparent: most people have nothing to say to each other! By 2005 or so, it will become clear that the Internet’s impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine’s.”

Only four years later Krugman came up with a plan to save the economy from the technology bubble which had just went bust – create another economic bubble! “To fight this recession the Fed needs…soaring household spending to offset moribund business investment. [So] Alan Greenspan needs to create a housing bubble to replace the Nasdaq bubble.” And with that came the worst financial crisis since the great depression.

And that’s not all! In 2010 he predicted that we’d begin experiencing deflation – when in reality we experienced relatively low inflation. In 2008 he predicted that Europe would outperform America economically – and then the financial crisis hit, and Europe was hit far harder than the U.S. (and took much longer to recover from it). On eleven occasions between April 2010-July 2012 Krugman predicted that the Euro would collapse – which obviously never happened.

There’s a running joke in the finance community that you can make yourself a killing my simply doing the opposite of whatever Jim Cramer is advising. Perhaps the same can be said for Krugman, too!

Congress, Economics

A Cool $5 Million-Does Pelosi Know Something We Don’t?

It’s not hard to see why some politicians are calling for a ban on lawmakers trading stocks. The problems of senators and House reps getting filthy rich and generating conflicts of interest have been with us for a long time. But the loot amassed by former California Democrat and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is raising eyebrows afresh.

According to the widely followed X account “Unusual Whales,” which tracks suspicious trades, Pelosi has made $5 million recently from her stock in the company Nvidia, which is now the most valuable company in the world (albeit with a much higher price to earnings ratio than second and third place, Microsoft and Apple). The company is best-known for its computer graphics cards powering popular high resolution video games, but like all such companies, it’s branching out into Artificial Intelligence (AI).

For reference, this is 20 times her annual salary.

An earlier story from a few weeks ago reported that Pelosi’s husband Paul made stock moves with Nvidia that netted the couple almost $4 million at that point.

What are the odds that their percent returns exceed that of investment legends like Warren Buffet?

It will probably be difficult or impossible to round up enough lawmakers to get a ban on congressional stock trading; too many people are feeding at that trough. Past legislation that claimed to ban the practice have done anything but. Politicians have always sought to enrich themselves above the “plebs” they pretend to serve, but the extremity of Pelosi’s wealth generation has really gotten under the skin of ordinary Americans.

Politicians are able to insulate themselves from much contact with real people, but the feelings of ordinary citizens flow freely on Elon Musk’s X.

Bruce is not alone. Like many others,  “FrankChronicles” believes Pelosi is engaged in insider trading. These are just suspicions and allegations, but they’re widely shared.

Then again, so is skepticism about accusations of insider trading:

But on the other-other hand, Pelosi’s return on investment has some people questioning how it is that a congresswoman seems to be outperforming top investment advisors.

We’re unlikely to find out for sure whether Pelosi or any other politician is getting inside tips because the system is set up to protect corruption for the powerful – but it’s safe to assume that’s exactly what’s happening.

Are you a casual or professional investor? What’s your take on Pelosi’s Nvidia windfall? Let us know in the comments.

Economics

Top Biden Economist Proves He’s Just as Incompetent as You’d Expect

It should come as no surprise that an economist in the Biden administration knows nothing about economics – and Biden’s 31st Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, Jared Bernstein, has reminded us that’s undoubtedly the case.

Bernstein appeared in a new documentary called “Finding the Money,” which was made by proponents of Modern Monetary Theory, a crank theory that argues the government can endlessly print money without consequences.

“The U.S. government can’t go bankrupt, because we can print our own money,” Bernstein says.

The interviewer then asks, “Like you said, they print the dollar, so why does the government even borrow?”

Bernstein then seemed uncertain in his response. “Again, some of this stuff gets.. some of the language and concepts are just confusing. The government definitely prints money, and it definitely lends that money by selling bonds. Is that what they do? They sell bonds, yeah, they sell bonds. Right? Since they sell bonds, and people buy the bonds, and lend them the money.”

He continued; “A lot of times, at least to my ear with MMT, the language and the concepts can be kind of unnecessarily confusing but there is no question that the government prints money and then it uses that money to um, uh … I guess I’m just, I can’t really, I don’t get it, I don’t know what they’re talking about. . . . It’s like, the government clearly prints money, it does it all the time, and it clearly borrows, otherwise you wouldn’t be having this debt and deficit conversation. So I don’t think there’s anything confusing there.”

The responses to his comment ranged from mockery…. to mockery.

Sadly, Bernstein probably is the most qualified person Biden could’ve found.

Economics

It’s Been Over a Year Since the Bud Light Boycott Began – Here’s How It’s Doing Now

Go woke, go broke.

Despite an increase in substantial earnings in Q1 2024 for parent company Anheuser-Busch, sales of Bud Light continue to plummet more than a year since its disastrous pro-trans marketing campaign.

A mass boycott by furious beer drinkers began in April 2023 after Bud Light launched its campaign featuring transgender activist Dylan Mulvaney. Following widespread publicity, sales of the beverage to retail stores had fallen by more than a quarter by July 2023.

One year on and sales continue to drop, although its impact on Anheuser-Busch is somewhat limited. The company experienced a 2.6% revenue increase to $14.55billion in the first quarter of the year, partly attributed to higher prices. That said, the boycott remains noticeable with a 9.9% volume decline in Bud Light sales across North America.

This was a shock to no one, of course.

Anheuser-Busch has not escaped the impact even with successes elsewhere. With its market share continuing to fall one year on, the brewer has sought to minimize its losses through an unsuccessful Super Bowl ad.

What is your view on the Bud Light fiasco? Did you stop drinking it after the Mulvaney campaign?


Scroll to Top