Author name: RVM News

News

Florida Boater Convicted After Marina Drinking Buddy Dies During Violent Memorial Day Fight [WATCH]

A Florida boating trip turned into a deadly marina nightmare after a boozy Memorial Day encounter ended with one man dead in the water and another facing life behind bars, as reported by The New York Post.

Kamal Padlowski, 52, was found guilty Thursday of first-degree murder in the death of 47-year-old Melvin Jimenez at Little Harbor Marina in Ruskin, Florida, according to the Hillsborough County State Attorney’s Office.

The case centered on a violent confrontation aboard Padlowski’s sailboat on May 25, 2024, after the two men had met only hours earlier and spent part of the holiday weekend drinking together.

Prosecutors said Padlowski shoved Jimenez during the brawl, causing him to fall backward and slam his head onto the dock.

Jimenez was left motionless on the fiberglass gangway, but instead of calling for help, Padlowski grabbed him by the ankles and dumped him into the marina water.

That decision proved central to the trial, where jurors heard the grim details of how a friendly barroom meeting spiraled into lethal violence.

Personal responsibility, as usual, arrived far too late for the man now staring at Florida State Prison.

“I didn’t know he was unconscious. I didn’t know that he had even fallen,” Padlowski said in court. “I knew he was still a threat to me, and I just wanted to get distance between us.”

Medical testimony added another brutal layer to the case. Physician and pathologist Edward Willey testified that Jimenez suffered vertebral fractures in the fall, which severed both vertebral arteries.

Willey said Jimenez would have died regardless of whether he had been thrown into the water. The state attorney’s office, however, ruled that Jimenez died from drowning.

The two men had crossed paths earlier that day at the nearby Sunset Bar and Grill, a tiki-themed spot where both were reportedly celebrating big life moments.

Jimenez had secured a contract to install security cameras with Walmart, while Padlowski had gotten engaged the day before, according to the Tampa Bay Times.

Padlowski recalled that he joked with Jimenez about ordering vodka, saying the drink was Russian and they called it “water.”

From there, the two men left the bar and took a short walk to the marina.

They spent roughly 40 minutes drinking aboard Padlowski’s docked sailboat with Padlowski’s fiancée, reportedly chatting in a friendly manner before the mood shifted.

Jimenez’s blood alcohol level was later measured at .26, more than three times the legal limit, according to the outlet.

Padlowski’s own alcohol level was not revealed, though he claimed he had consumed “two hard iced teas and maybe a shot or two of vodka.”

Whatever the exact count, this was not exactly the picture of sound judgment at sea.

Surveillance cameras captured the two men shoving each other aboard the boat before the fight moved onto the gangway, according to video obtained by 10 Tampa Bay News.

Padlowski claimed Jimenez threatened to kill him and rape his unidentified fiancée.

Padlowski argued self-defense during trial, saying Jimenez had shoved his fiancée and lunged at him.

Prosecutors pushed back, pointing to blurry surveillance footage that they said showed Padlowski punching Jimenez before grabbing his throat.

After Jimenez was dumped into the water, Padlowski remained near his boat armed with two kitchen knives until police arrived.

He first told officers he did not know where Jimenez had gone, apparently unaware that cameras had recorded the confrontation.

Jimenez’s wife, Angela Sprenger, testified against Padlowski and made clear she did not buy his version of events.

“Just unbelievable because I don’t believe a word he says. I think he is a narcissist and a murderer,” she told the court, according to 10 Tampa Bay News.

“All the things he was saying was just total lies. And to try to go after my husband’s character that way is just so awful,” she added.

Jimenez’s daughter Kimberly also addressed the court, speaking to the consequences Padlowski will now carry.

“At least he’ll get to spend the rest of his day thinking about my dad and how maybe if he was a better man and had a better character like my dad, he would have made the decisions that he did to lead to this,” she testified, according to WFLA.

A jury rejected Padlowski’s defense and found him guilty of first-degree murder. He now faces a mandatory life sentence in Florida State Prison, with sentencing scheduled for August 17.

The case leaves behind a grieving family, a marina stained by violence, and one more reminder that drunken chaos does not become self-defense just because the suspect says so after the cameras are found.

News

International Criminal Court Prosecutor Ousted in Stunning Sexual Misconduct Scandal [WATCH]

The International Criminal Court has removed Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan from office following a vote by its governing body over sexual misconduct allegations, making him the first sitting chief prosecutor in the court’s history to be dismissed, as reported by PJ Media.

The Assembly of States Parties, the 125-member governing body of the International Criminal Court (ICC), voted Friday to remove Khan after disciplinary proceedings stemming from allegations made by a junior female staff member.

Khan has denied the allegations and says he intends to challenge the decision.

According to Reuters, 82 member states voted in favor of removing Khan, exceeding the majority required under ICC rules.

Khan stepped aside from his duties in May 2025 while the United Nations Office of Internal Oversight Services investigated the allegations.

The ICC later suspended him in June 2026 pending the outcome of Friday’s vote.

The Hague-based ICC was established under the Rome Statute to prosecute individuals accused of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and the crime of aggression when national courts are unable or unwilling to prosecute those offenses.

According to the Associated Press, the ICC’s oversight body concluded that Khan committed “serious misconduct.”

The allegations originated from a former aide who has been publicly identified only as “Sarah.” She accused Khan of engaging in nonconsensual sexual conduct.

“There is no way for something to be consensual when you have such a power disparity,” Sarah told CNN.

Khan’s legal team rejected both the allegations and the decision to remove him from office, arguing the disciplinary process failed to provide due process.

“The decision is unsupported by any lawful or properly reasoned finding that Mr. Khan KC committed misconduct or breached his duties as Prosecutor,” said Tayab Ali, partner at Bindmans LLP and head of Khan’s legal team.

“He has denied the allegations from the outset and continues to do so.”

Ali also argued that the United Nations Office of Internal Oversight Services did not find misconduct and said a three-judge ICC panel unanimously concluded in March 2026 that the factual findings did not establish misconduct or a breach of duty.

According to Ali, the Assembly of States Parties prevented Khan and his legal team from making formal submissions before the vote and conducted what he described as a politically motivated process.

“The Prosecutor of this Court has been removed by an executive vote while under sanctions and while the Court is under immense political pressure,” Ali said.

Ali added that Khan plans to challenge the decision through every available legal avenue.

Khan attracted international attention during his tenure after seeking arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant over Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza.

ICC judges approved those warrants in November 2024 despite objections from both Israel and the United States, neither of which is a party to the Rome Statute.

The ICC has stated that Khan’s removal does not affect the legal status of those warrants. They remain in force unless the court’s judges decide to modify or revoke them.

The warrants also became an issue in New York politics. During his mayoral campaign, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani said he would seek Netanyahu’s arrest if the Israeli leader visited New York.

After taking office, Mamdani later acknowledged that New York City does not have the authority to enforce an ICC warrant, while urging the federal government to do so.

Khan’s removal also comes as Secretary of State Marco Rubio has continued the Trump administration’s efforts to challenge the authority of the International Criminal Court. Rubio has argued that the court poses a threat to U.S. sovereignty.

Although Khan has been removed as chief prosecutor, the ICC has made clear that the arrest warrants issued for Netanyahu and Gallant remain valid unless the court determines otherwise.

News

Judge Guts Pritzker Migrant Tuition Scheme as Trump Scores Major Immigration Victory

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker suffered a setback in federal court after a judge ruled that several Illinois laws providing higher education benefits to illegal immigrants violate federal law, handing the Trump administration another victory in its nationwide immigration enforcement effort, as reported by The New York Post.

U.S. District Judge Stephen McGlynn, a President Donald Trump appointee serving in the Southern District of Illinois, ruled Friday that Illinois’ in-state tuition policies, the RISE Act, and the Illinois DREAM Act are unconstitutional as they apply to illegal immigrants.

Trump Warns Iran Strike on Pickaxe Mountain Coming Soon, Says U.S. Campaign Far From Over

The ruling permanently bars Illinois from enforcing those laws, although McGlynn delayed the order for 14 days to give the state an opportunity to seek relief from an appeals court.

The decision marks another legal win for the Trump administration as the Justice Department continues challenging state laws that provide education benefits to illegal immigrants.

U.S. Attorney Steven Weinhoeft welcomed the ruling, arguing that Illinois’ policies violated federal law by offering benefits to illegal immigrants that were unavailable to many American citizens from other states.

“Illinois sought to incentivize illegal immigration on the taxpayer’s dime by treating illegal aliens better than US citizens living in other states, in clear violation of federal law,” Weinhoeft said in a statement.

“This ruling enforces the statute Congress wrote and stops the State from putting illegal aliens ahead of American citizens.”

The Justice Department filed its lawsuit against Illinois and several colleges in September 2025.

Federal attorneys argued that the state violated federal law by allowing illegal immigrants to receive in-state tuition, financial aid and scholarships without extending those same benefits to all U.S. citizens regardless of residency.

Judge McGlynn agreed with the federal government’s arguments, granting its motion for summary judgment while denying Illinois’ motion to dismiss the lawsuit.

The ruling invalidates three major state programs. Those include Illinois’ in-state tuition policy, the RISE Act, which provides access to state financial aid for certain students who are ineligible for federal aid, and the Illinois DREAM Act, which established scholarship opportunities for eligible students.

The decision drew praise from Rep. Mary Miller, R-Ill., who said the outcome benefits Illinois residents and taxpayers.

“This is a win for Illinois taxpayers and American students who were shut out while Pritzker prioritized foreigners in our country illegally,” Miller wrote on X.

The Illinois ruling follows another legal action by the Justice Department one day earlier. On Thursday, the department filed a similar lawsuit against Colorado over that state’s tuition and financial aid policies for illegal immigrants.

According to the Justice Department, Colorado’s ASSET Act and related policies unlawfully provide lower tuition rates and state financial aid to illegal immigrants while denying those same benefits to out-of-state U.S. citizens.

Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward said Congress settled the issue decades ago.

“For three decades, Congress has made clear that Colorado cannot give education benefits to illegal aliens that it does not give to all American citizens,” Woodward said.

“By granting illegal aliens in-state tuition, Colorado is not only violating federal law but subsidizing education for illegal aliens at taxpayers’ expense.

“Our litigation efforts will not cease until we have fulfilled President Trump’s promise that illegal aliens will not obtain preferential treatment over our nation’s own citizens.”

Colorado officials defended their policies following the lawsuit.

“The federal government seizing control of determining in-state tuition across the country is absurd,” a spokesperson for Gov. Jared Polis previously told Fox News Digital.

“In Colorado, we are expanding access to education to provide students with the skills to get good-paying jobs and doubling down on strategies to save students money.”

The Illinois decision adds to a growing list of victories for the Trump administration in similar cases.

The Justice Department has already won or reached settlements involving Texas, Kentucky, Oklahoma and Nebraska. Nebraska agreed to eliminate in-state tuition benefits for illegal immigrants as part of a settlement with the federal government.

Additional lawsuits remain pending against Minnesota, Virginia, California, New Jersey, Kansas, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Maryland and Colorado as the administration continues its legal campaign challenging state laws that provide education benefits to illegal immigrants.

Fox News Digital reported that it reached out to Pritzker’s office for comment.

News

Feeding Our Future Crook Gets Another 10 Years After Brazen Bid to Buy Verdict [WATCH]

A Minnesota man convicted in the massive Feeding Our Future fraud case has received another prison sentence after federal prosecutors said he attempted to bribe a juror during his criminal trial, as reported by Townhall.

Abdiaziz Shafii Farah, 37, was sentenced to 120 months in federal prison on July 22, 2026, by U.S. District Judge Eric C. Tostrud in St. Paul for attempting to influence the outcome of his 2024 fraud trial by bribing a juror.

The sentence comes after Farah had already been sentenced on Aug. 6, 2025, for his role in exploiting a federally funded child nutrition program that was at the center of the $250 million Feeding Our Future fraud scheme.

Federal prosecutors said the bribery plot unfolded shortly after jury selection began in Farah’s 2024 trial.

According to court documents, Farah and several associates allegedly conspired to pay a juror in exchange for a not-guilty verdict.

The government identified the alleged co-conspirators as Ladan Mohamed Ali, 33, Abdulkarim Shafii Farah, 25, Said Shafii Farah, 44, and Abdimajid Mohamed Nur, 25.

According to court filings, the group researched the juror online, conducted surveillance of her residence, and monitored her movements before carrying out the attempted bribe.

On June 2, 2024, prosecutors said Ladan Ali delivered a bag containing $120,000 in cash to the juror’s home.

Authorities said the payment came with a promise of additional money if the juror voted to acquit Farah.

Instead of accepting the offer, the juror immediately contacted law enforcement and reported the attempted bribery.

The following morning, the court ordered Farah to surrender his cellphone to investigators.

Before turning it over, however, prosecutors said Farah performed a factory reset on the device, deleting evidence connected to the bribery scheme.

United States Attorney Daniel N. Rosen said the sentence demonstrates that attempts to interfere with the judicial process will be met with significant penalties.

“Tampering with a juror is an assault on the integrity of the courts and the foundation of our democracy,” Rosen said.

“This sentence sends an unmistakable message that justice is not for sale.”

Federal investigators echoed that message following the sentencing.

“Today’s sentencing highlights the seriousness of attempting to corrupt the justice system. Abdiaziz Farah was already serving a significant sentence for defrauding the Federal Child Nutrition Program, and this additional conviction shows that efforts to bribe a jury will be met with firm consequences,” said FBI Assistant Special Agent in Charge Benni Jonsson, who is in charge of the FBI Minneapolis Criminal Branch.

“The FBI, along with federal prosecutors, will continue pursuing accountability for those charged in this case and anyone who attempts to undermine the integrity of our judicial process.”

Adam Jobes, Special Agent in Charge of IRS Criminal Investigation’s Chicago Field Office, said the case involved more than financial crimes.

“Abdiaziz Farah had already been held accountable for stealing from a program meant to feed children, yet he still chose to recruit others to help corrupt the justice system by bribing a juror,” Jobes said.

“When someone tries to buy a verdict, they are attacking the integrity of every courtroom and every citizen who depends on a fair trial. This sentence should leave no doubt that anyone who tries to manipulate our judicial process will be found, prosecuted, and held accountable.”

The sentencing comes as federal authorities continue securing convictions tied to the Feeding Our Future investigation.

Earlier this week, the 70th defendant connected to the fraud scheme pleaded guilty.

Bryan Musgrove, Inspector in Charge of the Denver Division of the United States Postal Inspection Service, credited cooperation among multiple agencies for the latest conviction.

“Today’s sentencing reflects the outstanding collaboration of law enforcement and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Minnesota,” Musgrove said.

“Postal Inspectors worked closely with our partners to hold Abdiaziz Farah accountable for his crimes. Despite the defendant’s efforts to abuse the legal process, justice prevailed.”

Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Superintendent Drew Evans said the bribery attempt struck at the heart of the court system.

“When Farah and his co-conspirators filled that bag with money, they were attempting not only to commit bribery, but to undermine the sanctity of our criminal justice system,” Evans said.

“I am proud of our work alongside our criminal justice partners to identify these criminals and help bring them to justice.”

The investigation was conducted by the FBI with assistance from IRS Criminal Investigation, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension.

Assistant United States Attorneys Rebecca E. Kline and Matthew C. Murphy prosecuted the case.

News

CNN Host Finally Admits Illegal Alien Voting Happens After New Jersey Fraud Bombshell [WATCH]

CNN and SiriusXM host Michael Smerconish said he no longer believes it is accurate to claim that noncitizen voting never occurs after New Jersey officials disclosed that a software error resulted in thousands of noncitizens being registered to vote, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

Smerconish made the remarks during a recent conversation with political analyst Mark Halperin.

Their discussion centered on New Jersey’s disclosure that approximately 6,600 noncitizens were improperly registered to vote because of a software error and that fewer than 400 ballots were cast by those individuals.

Software Company Fires Back At Democrat Governor Over Illegal Voter Scandal

The discussion came days after President Donald Trump delivered a national address focused on election integrity.

During that speech, Trump alleged that noncitizen voting was occurring in multiple states.

According to a report cited from Fox News, Smerconish acknowledged that the New Jersey disclosure caused him to reconsider previous statements he had made on the subject.

“I can’t say that any longer,” Smerconish said. “I don’t know how often it does happen, but I can’t say any longer, ‘This never happens.’”

Smerconish explained that his earlier position had been influenced by a January analysis published by The New York Times titled “Initial Review Finds No Widespread Illegal Voting by Migrants, Puncturing a Trump Claim.”

According to the source, that analysis reported that investigators found no evidence of widespread illegal voting by migrants while also noting that noncitizens had at times appeared on voter registration rolls.

During the conversation, Halperin agreed that the New Jersey disclosure challenged categorical claims that noncitizen voting never occurs.

At the same time, he said additional information would be necessary before drawing broader conclusions about how frequently such cases happen.

“Based on what we now know, the thing that Democrats said doesn’t happen happened,” Halperin said.

“And it’s not right to take the word of the Democratic governor of New Jersey about what actually happened.”

The discussion focused on the distinction between isolated incidents and broader claims regarding election integrity.

Smerconish indicated that while he was changing his position on whether such incidents ever occur, he was not making a broader claim about their prevalence.

The New Jersey disclosure has generated renewed attention on voter registration procedures and election administration.

Questions surrounding the accuracy of voter rolls and safeguards intended to prevent ineligible registrations have remained part of the national debate over election integrity.

The conversation between Smerconish and Halperin followed public reporting that New Jersey officials attributed the registrations to a software error.

The disclosure has prompted renewed discussion among commentators and public officials about how voter registration systems operate and whether additional reviews or safeguards are needed to identify registration errors.

Video of the exchange between Smerconish and Halperin circulated online after the interview, drawing attention to Smerconish’s acknowledgment that he no longer believes it is accurate to state that noncitizen voting never happens.

Halperin likewise emphasized that the available information warrants additional examination before conclusions are reached regarding the overall scope of the issue.

News

Grim Cause of Death Revealed for Naked Big Sur Hiker Found in Wilderness [WATCH]

Authorities have determined the cause of death for a Southern California hiker whose body was discovered earlier this year near a popular trail in Big Sur, concluding that no crime was involved, as reported by The New York Post.

The Monterey County Sheriff’s Office announced that Joanna Ruth Shields, a 37-year-old Carlsbad resident, died from “probable alcohol withdrawal seizures due to chronic alcohol use disorder.”

Officials classified her death as resulting from natural causes.

Shields’ body was discovered on April 9 in a pool of water near Sykes Hot Springs along the Pine Ridge Trail. At the time she was found, she was wearing only a black sports bra.

Investigators also located a pile of clothing, sandals, and a water bottle nearby.

Early reports raised questions after hikers noticed a wound on her head and markings around her neck. However, investigators said the completed forensic examination found no evidence that another person was involved in her death.

According to the coroner’s report, Shields had a laceration above her left eye, multiple bruises and abrasions on her body, and insect activity was present when her body was located.

The autopsy determined that the injury to her forehead was a superficial scalp laceration and did not contribute to her death.

Investigators also determined that the marks previously observed on her neck resulted from postmortem insect activity rather than foul play.

“Investigators found no evidence during the forensic examination or throughout the investigation to indicate that Ms. Shields was the victim of a crime,” investigators wrote.

The report further stated there was “not evidence of strangulation or any criminal act.”

The investigation also provided additional details about Shields’ health history before her death.

According to investigators, Shields had previously been diagnosed with bipolar disorder and alcoholism.

Her sister told detectives that Shields had experienced alcohol withdrawal seizures in the past but had not suffered another episode after achieving sobriety.

Investigators said that around Thanksgiving 2024, Shields stopped taking her prescribed psychiatric medication without consulting her psychiatrist.

Family members reported that she instead began using psilocybin and marijuana in an effort to manage her condition.

Her sister told investigators that Shields’ mental health deteriorated afterward.

According to the report, she experienced paranoia and delusions, was eventually evicted, and was involved in several public incidents in which she removed her clothing.

The report states that Shields later traveled to Illinois for treatment before returning to California.

Monterey County Sheriff-Coroner Tina Nieto expressed sympathy for Shields’ family following the completion of the investigation.

“Our thoughts and prayers remain with Joanna’s family and loved ones,” she wrote.

“We hope these findings provide them with some measure of peace and closure after several difficult months. I also want to thank our detectives, Coroner’s staff, our forensic pathologist, and our public safety partners for their professionalism, compassion, and dedication to conducting a thorough investigation and providing Joanna’s family with the answers they deserved.”

Before the cause of death was released, Shields’ relatives had described her passing as a tragic loss.

Her sister, Claudia Robinson, previously said Shields’ death resulted from a “tragic event.”

“We found out, and we’re all in different stages of grief as we attempt to process such a devastating blow to our hearts,” Robinson said.

She added, “[Shields] was a bright, radiant light in the peak of experiencing her own joy and gratitude for her existence, and her absence on this Earth will have a profound effect on countless numbers who had the opportunity to encounter her beautiful spirit.”

Robinson also shared another family member’s words, saying:

“As my sister Rachel said, ‘This is the saddest sadness I have ever known.'”

Friends and former colleagues also remembered Shields following her death. An avid skateboarder, she previously worked in the skateboarding industry.

Jeff Anning, owner of Evolve Skateboards, recalled her enthusiasm and kindness.

“She just had so much energy. She was just so passionate, so kind, and she was always, you know, putting other people first,” Anning said.

News

Carnival Roasts Passenger Caught Using Dining Fork Scraping Foot in Disgusting Cruise Video [WATCH]

A viral social media video showing a passenger using a dining utensil to scratch her foot aboard a Carnival Cruise ship prompted the cruise line to issue a public response emphasizing its hygiene standards and confirming the utensil was removed from service, as reported by The New York Post.

The footage, which spread across TikTok and Instagram, shows an unidentified woman wearing a maroon long-sleeve shirt sitting in a public dining area on a Carnival Cruise ship.

The video appears to show her scratching her foot, which viewers claimed showed signs of a skin condition, while eating. She is later seen using a fork for the same purpose.

Elderly Cruise Passenger Dies After Scooter Plunge Off Bahamas Pier

The clips were posted by social media user @lucky_charmedcourt, who divided the incident into six separate videos on TikTok and Instagram. According to the posts, the second video, which captured the woman using the fork, accumulated approximately 6.7 million views on TikTok.

The videos also documented the aftermath of the incident. According to the creator, the situation was reported to Carnival guest services before eventually being brought to the attention of the ship’s captain.

Carnival addressed the incident publicly in an Instagram post published Wednesday.

The cruise line wrote, “Hi Carnival cruisers. We can confirm that forks are intended for food, not foot care. Once we became aware of the situation, our team quickly addressed it with the guest and removed the utensil from service.”

The company continued by emphasizing its sanitation practices.

“While the video may be generating laughs and gasps online, cleanliness and hygiene are no joke to us. Our crew works hard every day to maintain high standards across our (feet) fleet and to ensure all guests enjoy a safe, clean, and comfortable vacation.”

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Court (@lucky_charmedcourt)

The company’s humorous reference to its “feet fleet” drew attention online while reinforcing its message about onboard cleanliness.

Although Carnival disabled comments on its Instagram post, the statement still attracted significant engagement. The post received roughly 30,600 likes and was shared more than 1,000 times.

The original social media videos continued generating reactions from viewers who expressed concern over the incident.

One Instagram commenter wrote, “If y’all ain’t tell security so they can throw that fork away, I hope you end up eating off of it.”

Another user commented, “I’m bringing my own silverware to restaurants from now on lol.”

A third person added, “This is why I eat with plastic utensils.”

According to the videos, the woman initially scratched her foot with her fingers before later using the fork while seated at the dining table.

The incident is the latest example of Carnival drawing widespread attention on social media over passenger behavior or onboard policies.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Carnival Cruise Line (@carnival)

Recently, Carnival also made headlines after reminding passengers aboard the Carnival Splendor to follow local dress expectations when visiting Lifou, an island in New Caledonia in the South Pacific.

Passengers were instructed to avoid wearing G-strings, thongs, monokinis, tankinis, and to refrain from topless sunbathing while ashore.

Carnival explains the policy in its online dress code guidance.

“We kindly ask guests to respect the local culture and rules in the ports we visit,” the company states.

The cruise line also noted that Lifou has particularly strict expectations for visitors.

“Some destinations, such as Lifou, which is a tribal island, are populated by proud indigenous people whose culture is based on respect, and in many cases are highly religious,” Carnival states.

The company said the guidance is intended to help passengers respect local customs while visiting ports of call during their vacations.

News

Mayor Mamdani Torched by NYC Jewish Leaders After Stabbings as Hate Crime Demands Grow [WATCH]

New York City Jewish leaders delivered a blistering message to Mayor Zohran Mamdani on Friday, demanding that he “stop fanning the flames of hatred and division” after two men were stabbed on the Upper West Side in separate attacks now under hate crime review, as reported by The New York Post.

The suspect, Raul Morales, 51, allegedly shouted “Allahu Akbar” during the attacks, according to police.

The victims included one Asian man and one Jewish man, a detail that has only intensified questions about motive and public safety in a city already on edge.

The stabbings unfolded Thursday afternoon just blocks from Central Park, and Jewish leaders made clear they see more than random street violence at work.

They pointed directly at a political climate they say has grown increasingly hostile toward Jews and Israel, with Mamdani’s rhetoric sitting right in the middle of the mess.

“We’re horrified and heartbroken by yesterday’s attacks. But to be clear, we are no longer surprised,” UJA Federation of New York CEO Eric Goldstein said during a press conference near the scene.

Goldstein did not tiptoe around the issue, which is refreshing in a city where officials often prefer polite word salads while regular people bleed on the sidewalk.

He said the public conversation around Israel and Jewish New Yorkers has become uglier, more dangerous, and far too normalized.

“For far too long now, we’ve watched the rhetoric surrounding Israel and the Jewish community grow increasingly toxic,” Goldstein said.

Then came the direct hit at City Hall.

“When the mayor of New York repeatedly uses his platform to relentlessly single out and demonize Israel, the world’s only Jewish state, and calls those who support it ‘monsters,’ he contributes to a climate in which Jewish New Yorkers are increasingly targeted and unsafe,” Goldstein said.

Goldstein followed with the warning that landed hardest.

“Mayor Mamdani, stop fanning the flames of hatred and division. The consequences are not abstract; they are playing out on our streets. But make no mistake, we are not going anywhere.”

Mark Treyger, CEO of the Jewish Community Relations Council, said he expects prosecutors to treat the case with the seriousness it deserves.

He called on the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office “to fully prosecute this to the fullest extent of the law, whether this attack is ultimately prosecuted as a hate crime.”

Police said investigators were reviewing whether Morales was driven by bias, although NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch said:

“The initial investigation suggests that mental health may have been a factor.”

That may be true, but New Yorkers have heard that line before, usually right before the system finds a way to explain away behavior that ordinary citizens are simply forced to survive.

According to police and sources, Morales first attacked 57-year-old Chok Sung, an Asian man, near West 84th Street and Central Park West at about 1:30 p.m. Sung was stabbed in the back with a knife.

The second victim was identified as Moshe Yezhak Grunhaus, a 50-year-old Jewish man who was wearing a yarmulke.

Police and sources said he was stabbed in the torso with a screwdriver after leaving a synagogue near Amsterdam Avenue and West 86th Street.

Video from the scene showed Grunhaus on the ground clutching his wound as emergency medical workers arrived.

Both victims were taken to Saint Luke’s Hospital and were listed in stable condition, according to police.

Mamdani responded Thursday with the kind of statement that politicians release when pressure builds, and cameras start pointing their way.

“These hateful and despicable attacks have no place in our city,” he said.

Other officials condemned the violence as well, including New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, who called the stabbings another “senseless” attack on Jewish New Yorkers.

“The strength of New York has always been our ability to live together across every faith and background,” Hochul said.

Hochul added, “Anyone who tries to tear that apart will be met with the full force of the law. New York will stand with our Jewish community today, tomorrow, and always.”

The question now is whether those words turn into action, or whether New Yorkers get another round of press conference outrage followed by the usual bureaucratic shrug.

Jewish leaders are demanding hate crime charges for a reason, and after years of rising public hostility toward Jews, they are done pretending rhetoric has no consequences.

News

Missouri Prosecutor Removed After Alleged Ties to Illegal Immigrant Sex-Crime Suspect [WATCH]

A Missouri judge has temporarily stripped Ray County Prosecuting Attorney Camille Johnston of her authority after Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway filed a petition alleging Johnston engaged in multiple conflicts of interest involving criminal cases, including an alleged prior romantic relationship with an illegal immigrant facing felony sex crime charges, as reported by Fox News.

The attorney general’s petition for quo warranto seeks Johnston’s removal from office and alleges a pattern of misconduct involving several criminal matters handled by the Ray County Prosecutor’s Office.

According to Hanaway’s office, a judge granted a preliminary order preventing Johnston from exercising the duties of prosecutor while the case proceeds.

The attorney general’s office told Fox News Digital that Johnston “is not allowed to take any actions in any official capacity” and that, unless reinstated during the litigation, “at this time, she is no longer Ray County Prosecuting Attorney.”

In a statement provided to Fox News Digital, Hanaway said the allegations justify Johnston’s removal from office.

“When an elected official treats public office like their personal playground, betraying the public trust, ignoring legal obligations, and putting self-interest first, removal isn’t a suggestion, it’s a necessity,” Hanaway said.

“Johnston’s record reflects a sustained pattern of misconduct and willful neglect that has undermined the integrity of the prosecutor’s office and poses a serious threat to public safety. In Missouri, public office is public trust, not a personal entitlement, and no one is above accountability.”

The petition alleges Johnston failed to recuse herself from matters involving Juan David Gutierrez, an illegal immigrant who is facing felony sex offense charges in Ray County.

According to the attorney general’s office, Johnston and Gutierrez previously lived together and had been involved in a romantic relationship before Johnston assumed office on Jan. 1, 2023.

The filing states Johnston was informed as early as Sept. 15, 2020, that Gutierrez was a suspect in a Ray County sexual assault investigation.

According to the petition, he is currently awaiting trial on felony sex offense charges, although the case has been placed on hold pending an appeal in another matter.

Hanaway’s office said Johnston “failed to recuse during the investigation” involving Gutierrez. A local court later appointed the Missouri Attorney General’s Office to prosecute the case.

The petition further alleges Johnston knew Gutierrez’s immigration status for several years and was aware he had been in the United States illegally since 2019.

According to the filing, Johnston knew where Gutierrez was after he left Missouri but did not provide that information to law enforcement.

The petition also alleges she visited him in Mississippi, vacationed with him in Florida, and transferred the title of her vehicle to him in 2023.

The attorney general alleges those actions helped Gutierrez leave Ray County while he was under criminal investigation.

Local television station KSHB reported that the Missouri State Highway Patrol submitted investigative findings to the attorney general’s office in 2020, but prosecutors declined charges and closed the case in 2022.

According to KSHB, the investigation resumed after a private investigator reviewing cold cases alerted then-Ray County Sheriff Scott Childers, who contacted the attorney general’s office in 2023 with additional information that could assist in locating Gutierrez.

Johnston’s attorney, Chad Gardner, did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

The petition also alleges Johnston maintained an undisclosed romantic relationship with a Ray County criminal defense attorney who represented defendants in cases prosecuted by her office.

According to the filing, Johnston neither disclosed the relationship nor sought appointment of a special prosecutor in those matters.

In a separate allegation, the petition claims Johnston was involved in a romantic relationship with a man charged in a Ray County domestic violence case.

According to the filing, local law enforcement later requested a special prosecutor after learning of the alleged relationship, resulting in Johnston’s disqualification from that prosecution.

Beyond the alleged conflicts involving criminal cases, the attorney general’s petition accuses Johnston of creating what it described as an atmosphere of fear and intimidation within the prosecutor’s office by verbally berating employees.

The filing also alleges Johnston retaliated against an employee who became aware of one of the alleged relationships by terminating that employee after learning they knew about the matter.

According to the petition, Johnston recognized the potential conflicts created by the alleged relationships but continued the conduct, failed to disclose the information and “falsely denied the existence” of the relationships when questioned.

Hanaway’s office said it stands by the allegations contained in the petition but declined to comment on whether any criminal charges could result from the investigation.

The court proceedings regarding Johnston’s removal from office remain ongoing.

News

NYC Suspect Allegedly Shouted “Allahu Akbar” Before Randomly Stabbing Two Men: NYPD [WATCH]

Two men were hospitalized Thursday after they were stabbed in separate attacks in New York City, and investigators are examining whether the incidents may have been motivated by bias after witnesses reported the suspect shouted “Allahu Akbar” during both assaults, according to the New York Police Department.

Police arrested 51-year-old Raul Morales shortly after the attacks, as reported by Fox 11.

New York Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch said investigators are working to determine whether the incidents qualify as hate crimes.

According to Tisch, witnesses reported hearing Morales shout “Allahu Akbar” during both attacks.

The suspect was taken into custody without further incident after officers located him with the assistance of a bystander.

“While the perpetrator has no known mental health history with the NYPD, the initial investigation suggests that mental health may have been a factor,” Tisch wrote on X.

Authorities said the victims were an Asian man and a Jewish man. Both were transported to Mount Sinai Morningside Hospital for treatment.

According to Tisch, neither victim suffered injuries considered life-threatening, and both are expected to recover.

Police said investigators have not identified any relationship between Morales and either victim.

“At this time there is no known link between Morales and either of the victims, nor between the victims and each other,” Tisch said.

The attacks occurred separately, and investigators are continuing to determine whether the incidents were connected beyond the suspect’s alleged involvement.

Police have not released additional details regarding the sequence of events leading up to the stabbings or what may have prompted the attacks.

Tisch credited a bystander for helping officers quickly locate the suspect after the incidents.

According to the commissioner, a “good Samaritan” pointed responding officers toward the area where Morales was hiding. Officers then located and arrested him without additional confrontation.

Authorities have not announced any formal hate crime charges. Officials said investigators are reviewing witness statements, physical evidence and other information gathered during the investigation to determine whether bias played a role in the attacks.

The investigation also includes examining whether Morales’ mental state may have contributed to the incidents.

Police noted that Morales had no known mental health history with the NYPD, though Tisch said preliminary investigative findings indicate mental health may have been a factor.

Investigators have not released additional information regarding Morales’ background or whether he has obtained legal representation.

The NYPD said detectives continue interviewing witnesses and reviewing evidence as the investigation remains active.

Officials have not announced when Morales is expected to appear in court or what additional charges, if any, may be filed as investigators continue examining the circumstances surrounding the two stabbings.


Scroll to Top