Author name: RVM News

News

JD Vance Hails Sophie Cunningham’s Courage in Explosive Fight to Save Women’s Sports [WATCH]

Vice President JD Vance threw his support behind Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham as she faces national criticism for defending fairness in women’s sports. The vice president praised her willingness to speak plainly while activists and sports leaders battle over transgender participation, as reported by Fox News.

Vance addressed Cunningham during an appearance on Fox News’ “Ingraham Angle.” The broader discussion covered the war in Iran, negotiations with the Iranian regime, and the recent birth of his fourth child.

The conversation turned to Cunningham after her public stand attracted a wave of new supporters and predictable outrage from critics. Vance argued that hostile reactions are often the price paid by people willing to challenge powerful political and cultural pressure.

“Look, sometimes when you’re courageous in this country, some of the worst people in the world will try to attack you. What I would tell Sophie and anybody is to keep speaking your mind. You actually are inspiring a dozen people for every person that criticizes you,” Vance said.

Vance connected Cunningham’s stand to the larger fight over the country’s direction and the public’s willingness to reject intimidation. “We cannot take our country back; we cannot save the United States of America unless you have people of courage who are speaking their mind.”

He also described courage as something that spreads when ordinary Americans see another person withstand attacks from an angry mob. “The thing about courage is it’s contagious,” Vance said.

His message reflected the frustration of Americans who believe common sense has been shoved aside in the debate over women’s athletics. Female athletes who defend biological distinctions frequently find themselves targeted by activists who treat basic fairness as some sort of unforgivable offense.

Cunningham has become a prominent figure in that argument, drawing both support and criticism after speaking about protecting women’s competition. Her position has helped move the issue beyond sports commentary and into a much larger national discussion about fairness, opportunity, and truth.

Rallies supporting Cunningham have taken place around the Fever’s last three games. Two additional rallies are scheduled, including one surrounding Indiana’s Saturday contest against the Chicago Sky and another when the Fever face the New York Liberty on Aug. 22.

Those gatherings have placed additional attention on the WNBA, which can no longer pretend the debate is confined to political hearings or social media. Four coaches have issued public statements about the issue since the rallies began, showing how quickly the controversy has spread across the league.

The Fever organization, meanwhile, has largely attempted to keep the national conversation away from its locker room. Team officials abruptly ended a press conference after Cunningham faced questions, a move that only generated more attention around the controversy.

Trying to bury a national debate rarely makes it disappear, especially when fans are organizing outside arenas and prominent officials are weighing in. The league now finds itself confronting questions that women across the country have been asking for years.

Indiana is also navigating a critical stretch in its 2026 season. The Fever suffered a hard-fought 108- 100 loss against the Minnesota Lynx on Aug. 2, adding competitive pressure to an already intense atmosphere surrounding the team.

The Fever next face the defending champion Las Vegas Aces on Thursday. After that contest, Indiana will meet Chicago in a weekend matchup expected to draw another rally supporting Cunningham and the broader campaign to preserve women’s sports.

The athletic stakes are significant, but the cultural stakes have become even larger. Cunningham’s critics may prefer that she remain quiet and dribble, but her supporters see an athlete willing to defend the very category that created opportunities for female competitors.

Vance’s remarks also placed the White House firmly behind Cunningham as she deals with the growing backlash. His response emphasized that speaking honestly can encourage others who agree but remain silent because they fear professional or social consequences.

The vice president said one courageous voice can inspire many others to resist public pressure. “So I would tell Sophie to keep going.”

That message is likely to resonate far beyond the WNBA. Cunningham’s stand has become another reminder that cultural institutions cannot indefinitely dodge basic questions about whether women’s sports will remain reserved for women.

News

Anti-Trump Canadian Slapper Suffers Crushing Fundraiser Flop Before Deportation [WATCH]

The legal saga of Kaitlyn Tracey ended Tuesday with a deportation order, a misdemeanor conviction, and an online fundraiser that could not even reach half of its requested total. The Canadian national drew public outrage after slapping a teenage girl wearing patriotic clothing on the Jersey Shore, as reported by The New York Post.

Tracey’s legal fund collected just $4,857 toward a $10,000 goal, leaving her supporters well short of the mark when the immigration case reached its humiliating finish. For a cause apparently pitched as worthy of rescue, the response amounted to a rather loud vote of no confidence.

The 33-year-old had been held by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Texas before appearing by telephone in Toms River, New Jersey. She pleaded guilty Tuesday to one count of simple assault, classified as a misdemeanor, under a plea agreement that spared her from more serious punishment.

A judge sentenced Tracey to one day behind bars, but credited her for time already served in Ocean County jail last month. That meant no additional local jail time, though the larger consequence was clear: she was ordered deported to Canada, ending her unlawful stay in the United States.

The Department of Homeland Security had already supplied a memorable nickname, calling Tracey the “Maple Leaf Menace.” It was unusually colorful language from Washington, but after an adult targeted a teenager over a shirt, even the federal bureaucracy managed to find the proper level of ridicule.

The confrontation unfolded July 3 on the boardwalk in Point Pleasant Beach, where Tracey approached a group of four teenagers. One of the girls was wearing a USA 250 tank top, an unmistakably patriotic garment that apparently proved too much for the anti-Trump Canadian to tolerate peacefully.

Police said an argument followed before Tracey slapped the girl across the face, with the incident captured on camera. What should have been an ordinary holiday outing instead became another example of political hostility spilling into real life, this time with a teenager absorbing the blow.

Authorities later determined that Tracey had overstayed her visa and was in the country illegally at the time of her arrest, according to DHS. Her immigration violation transformed a local assault case into a federal removal matter and put her future in the United States squarely in the hands of immigration officials.

Tracey’s husband, Matthew Geroni, had previously launched a GoFundMe campaign to cover her legal costs. Geroni, described as fiercely opposed to President Trump, tried to rally financial support, but the platform removed the campaign because its rules prohibit fundraising for people accused of violent crimes.

That removal forced the effort elsewhere, yet changing platforms did not produce the cash avalanche the couple apparently hoped to see. The replacement fundraiser stalled below the halfway point, proving that online outrage and actual financial commitment are not always the same thing.

The plea deal resolved the criminal charge with a relatively light sentence, especially considering the public nature of the confrontation and the age of the victim. Tracey received credit for time served, while the deportation order supplied the consequence that local sentencing did not.

Supporters may have viewed Tracey as a political casualty, but the recorded encounter and her guilty plea left little room for heroic storytelling. Slapping a teenager over patriotic clothing is not principled dissent, no matter how many fashionable slogans the activist class tries to drape around it.

The case also carried a basic immigration lesson that Washington too often works overtime to avoid. A visa is permission to remain under defined conditions, not a permanent entitlement, and overstaying it can bring removal when other criminal conduct draws attention from law enforcement.

For residents of Point Pleasant Beach, the episode offered an ugly glimpse of how quickly political obsession can poison a public space. Families and teenagers should be able to walk a boardwalk in patriotic clothing without wondering whether an enraged stranger will turn partisan contempt into physical aggression.

Tracey now heads back to Canada with a conviction, a deportation order, and a legal fundraiser that fell embarrassingly flat. The “Maple Leaf Menace” may have wanted a political confrontation, but what she received was a courtroom reckoning and a one-way trip home.

News

Ohio Dad Poses as 11-Year-Old Daughter in TikTok Trap, Shoots Alleged Rapist Twice [WATCH]

An Ohio father allegedly took justice into his own hands after discovering that his 11-year-old daughter had been sexually assaulted inside the family home. Police say the father posed as the girl on TikTok, lured the suspected attacker back to the residence, and shot him twice.

Malik Chandler, 31, was charged with felony assault following the July shooting at his Grove City home. The wounded man, identified as 20-year-old Diego Montoya Gonzalez, now faces rape and child exploitation charges stemming from a deeply disturbing investigation.

Prosecutors said the shocking chain of events began when the girl’s mother found a video on her daughter’s phone. Authorities allege the recording showed Montoya Gonzalez sexually assaulting the child inside the family’s home.

The discovery is the kind of nightmare that makes any decent parent’s blood boil. According to investigators, Chandler responded the next day by taking control of his daughter’s TikTok account and pretending to be the girl.

Authorities said Chandler used the account to persuade Montoya Gonzalez to return to the home. Once the young man arrived, the confrontation quickly turned violent, leaving him wounded by two gunshots.

Chandler reportedly told investigators that his original plan was to beat Montoya Gonzalez, detain him, and call police. He said the situation escalated when he believed Montoya Gonzalez was reaching into his pocket for a firearm.

The father then grabbed his own gun from a counter and opened fire, according to the account he gave investigators. Police have not indicated that a weapon was recovered from Montoya Gonzalez during the confrontation.

When officers arrived, they reportedly found Montoya Gonzalez sitting in a chair with two gunshot wounds. Emergency personnel transported him to Grant Medical Center in Columbus for treatment.

Chandler was arrested and charged with felony assault, while a judge set his bond at $100,000. The criminal case means the father must now answer for the shooting even as prosecutors pursue serious allegations involving his daughter.

The law does not provide parents with a free pass to arrange violent confrontations, no matter how revolting the underlying accusation may be. Still, the stark difference between the bond amounts in the two cases is certain to raise eyebrows among Americans already frustrated with the justice system.

A grand jury indicted Montoya Gonzalez on Friday on five counts of pandering sexually oriented material, two counts of rape, and one count of obstruction of official business. Those charges substantially widened the case beyond the alleged assault involving Chandler’s daughter.

Prosecutors allege investigators found several videos on Montoya Gonzalez’s phone depicting the sexual abuse of children. One recording allegedly involved an infant or toddler, adding another sickening layer to an already horrifying case.

The girl’s parents attended Montoya Gonzalez’s arraignment Monday in Franklin County Common Pleas Court. A judge imposed a $20,000 recognizance bond along with a $50,000 cash bond, according to local reports.

If Montoya Gonzalez secures his release, he has been ordered to avoid all contact with the girl and her family. The court also barred him from using the internet for anything outside of employment, an especially notable restriction given the allegations surrounding digital videos and TikTok.

The Franklin County Prosecutor’s Office did not immediately provide additional information about the cases. Chandler and Montoya Gonzalez now face separate legal battles arising from one grim episode, with a child and her family left at the center of a case no parent should ever have to endure.

News

Hasan Piker Blasts Democrat Voters as ‘Islamophobic Pieces of Sh*t’ [WATCH]

Political commentator Hasan Piker criticized Democrats who opposed Abdul El-Sayed during Michigan’s Democratic Senate primary, accusing them of Islamophobia and arguing that they should now unite behind the party’s nominee ahead of the general election.

Piker, who has publicly supported El-Sayed, made the remarks during a livestream following the conclusion of the Democratic primary. His comments targeted Democrats who had criticized El-Sayed throughout the campaign and who, according to Piker, were now calling for the nominee to repair divisions within the party.

During the broadcast, Piker rejected the suggestion that El-Sayed bears the responsibility for mending relationships with Democrats who opposed his candidacy.

“Everyone being like, ‘Abdul has a fuck-ton of work to do mending bridges’, here’s the fucking take nuke for you: You are all unbelievably Islamophobic pieces of shit. You literally called the dude a fucking terrorist for months on end and called him a sexist, misogynist, terrorist, bad candidate, fake doctor when he has two fucking degrees. And now you’re going to say sit there and be like, ‘you really gotta come to me now.’ What are you talking about? Do you wanna win or not? LOCK THE FUCK IN.”

The remarks came after El-Sayed secured the Democratic nomination for the U.S. Senate seat. As the campaign shifts toward the general election, Democrats will be seeking to unify supporters who backed different candidates during the primary contest.

Piker’s comments quickly drew attention online because of both the language he used and his accusation that opposition to El-Sayed was motivated by anti-Muslim bias. His statement focused on what he described as months of criticism directed at El-Sayed during the primary campaign, including accusations that questioned his qualifications and character.

El-Sayed, a physician, has frequently highlighted his educational background during his political career. In his comments, Piker referenced that background while responding to critics who questioned El-Sayed’s credentials.

Following the livestream, Hot Air columnist Ed Morrissey responded to Piker’s comments, arguing that they reflected a broader ideological mindset rather than an effort to persuade skeptical voters.

“The arrogance of Piker is astonishing to behold, and at the same time hardly surprising,” Morrissey wrote.

He continued by addressing what he views as the relationship between socialist politics and Islam, writing:

“Many wonder at how the Left can embrace socialism and Islam at the same time. Piker’s declaration here makes it clear: both socialism and Islam require submission. And that is precisely what Piker is demanding now that the primary is finally over. And in this case, it’s Piker who’s making Islam the issue, not to mention Israel.”

The exchange added another point of debate to an already closely watched Michigan Senate race. El-Sayed’s campaign has attracted support from a number of progressive activists and public figures, while also drawing criticism from political opponents during the primary season.

With the Democratic nomination now decided, attention is expected to shift toward the general election, where party leaders typically seek to consolidate support from voters who backed other candidates during the primary.

Piker’s comments instead focused on those Democrats who opposed El-Sayed during the nomination contest, arguing that they—not the nominee—should be responsible for moving past the divisions created during the campaign.

The discussion also prompted broader commentary about political priorities within progressive circles. Morrissey argued that issues receiving attention from activists have shifted over time, specifically referencing debates surrounding Israel.

As the general election campaign begins, Piker’s remarks and the reaction they generated underscore the continuing divisions that emerged during the Democratic primary and the challenges the party may face as it works to unify its coalition before November.

News

Trump Charms Vegas Crowd After Saving Little Boy and Torching Biden with Perfect Quip [WATCH]

President Donald Trump went to Las Vegas on Wednesday to sell an economic message, rally Republicans, and remind Nevada voters why they sent him back to the White House. Then a little boy nearly stole the entire show, as reported by Red State.

The scene unfolded at the Red Rock Casino in Summerlin, where Trump was touting his agenda ahead of the November midterms. The crowd came for politics, policy, and a little Trump-style entertainment, and they got all three.

A major focus of the event was the president’s “no tax on tips” proposal, the kind of kitchen table issue that resonates in Nevada far more than the usual Beltway lectures. Trump has credited the idea with helping him win the state in 2024, and judging from the Vegas crowd, voters have not forgotten it.

Trump’s Laugh-Out-Loud Endorsement of Susan Collins Wrecks Leftist Opponent

The president signed the policy into law last year as part of his One Big Beautiful Bill. In Las Vegas, where service workers know exactly how much government can take before a paycheck even gets home, the pitch was not exactly hard to understand.

To highlight the impact, Trump brought a local family onto the stage. Sandra, a waitress at a Las Vegas casino, joined him alongside her husband, Brad, a police officer, and their two young children.

The couple spoke about how tax relief on tips and overtime had helped their household. That is the sort of thing working families notice, even if liberal economists on television prefer to pretend the only real economy exists inside a spreadsheet.

Sandra and Brad also thanked Trump for his new Trump Accounts program. The public-private partnership allows families to open investment accounts for minor children, giving parents another way to build a financial foundation for the next generation.

Then Sandra’s little boy decided he had his own contribution to make. As his mother began speaking, looking understandably nervous in front of a packed room and the president of the United States, the child started wandering away from his father.

The boy made a beeline toward the steps and drifted a little too close to the edge of the stage. Trump noticed immediately, stepped in, and gently pulled him back to safety before returning him to his mother.

The moment was quick, but it was pure Trump. He handled the situation like a grandfather, kept the child safe, and then did what Trump does better than any politician alive: he found the punchline.

“I don’t want him to be Biden and fall off the stage.” The crowd did not need a fact check from some liberal media hall monitor to understand the reference.

After years of Americans watching Joe Biden stumble through speeches, stairs, directions, and basic geography, the line landed exactly where it was supposed to land. Trump took a potentially tense second and turned it into a laugh, all while keeping the little boy from taking a tumble.

It was also a tidy little contrast in instincts. Trump saw a child near danger and moved fast, which is more executive action than Washington has seen from plenty of Democrats in years.

The rally itself had plenty of Las Vegas flavor. Retired heavyweight champion Mike Tyson was in attendance, as was Rick Harrison of Pawn Stars, giving the event the kind of celebrity backdrop only Trump seems able to draw without looking like he is begging Hollywood for approval.

Still, even with Tyson and Harrison in the room, the pint-sized wanderer became the unexpected star. The boy’s name was not immediately known, but he managed to create the most replayable moment of the day without saying a word.

Trump did not seem to mind being briefly upstaged. If anything, the exchange gave him exactly the kind of human moment campaigns crave, but consultants can never manufacture.

The event began as a policy pitch about lower taxes, family savings, and relief for working Americans. It ended with a toddler, a quick save, and a Biden joke that practically wrote itself.

That is the Trump formula in full. Serious policy for people who work, a little showmanship for the crowd, and just enough humor to drive the political class absolutely crazy.

Nevada voters heard about tips, overtime, family investment accounts, and the broader economic message Trump is taking into the midterms. They also got a reminder that politics does not have to be delivered in the lifeless language of Washington committees and Democrat talking points.

For the family onstage, the day was about thanking the president for policies that helped them financially. For the audience, it was a memorable rally moment wrapped in classic Trump timing.

And for everyone watching the clip afterward, it was another reminder that the former reality television star turned president still knows exactly how to command a stage, even when a toddler gives him a serious run for his money.

News

Bernie Sanders Spins a Whopper as Socialist Agenda Gets Too Toxic to Defend [WATCH]

Sen. Bernie Sanders appears to have discovered a sudden respect for political moderation, or at least the campaign season version of it, as reported by Townhall.

The Vermont socialist, who has spent decades dragging the Democratic Party toward the fever swamps of the left, now wants voters to believe the radical ideas attached to his movement are somehow imaginary.

During an appearance on Pod Save America, Sanders insisted that “no serious person I know who is running for office believes in defunding the police” or supports open borders.

That line may sound comforting to nervous Democrat strategists watching the midterm map, but it lands with a thud for anyone who has paid attention to the candidates Sanders has championed.

This is not a case of Republicans inventing a scarecrow. The left built the scarecrow, put it on a campaign flyer, raised money from it, and then acted shocked when normal Americans noticed.

Candidates Sanders has supported and appeared with have openly embraced ideas that would have been considered fringe even by old-school liberals not long ago.

Darializa Avila Chevalier and Claire Valdez, both connected to Sanders-style socialist politics, have campaigned on ideas ranging from abolishing prisons to mass amnesty and defunding federal immigration enforcement.

Then there is U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico, who once declared that “prison is violence” during a public appearance.

That is not a law-and-order platform. That is the kind of faculty lounge slogan that makes working families wonder whether anyone on the left has ever had to call 911 after midnight.

Sanders wants to pretend that no serious candidate supports these positions, but the problem for him is that the Democratic Socialists of America have put the radicalism in writing.

The group’s platform calls for abolishing ICE, ending police immunity, and ending “mass incarceration” by “fully abolishing the police and prison system,” along with the “legalization of migration.”

Those are not conservative talking points. Those are their own words, their own agenda, and their own vision for America, served up without the polite packaging Sanders is now trying to slap on it.

The timing of Sanders suddenly playing cleanup man is not exactly mysterious.

Democrats are staring at a midterm electorate that has grown tired of open border chaos, rising crime, and activists who treat police officers like villains while treating illegal immigration as a civil right.

That is a tough sell outside deep blue activist circles, and Sanders seems to know it.

Across New York and other progressive strongholds, Democratic Socialists tied to the Sanders and Mamdani wing of the party have been beating incumbents who were already far to the left by any normal American standard.

In other words, the party is not drifting back to the center. It is being pulled even harder toward socialism, and Sanders is one of the main reasons that happened.

Now that the brand is becoming politically radioactive, he wants to blur the edges and reassure voters that nobody important really means the crazy stuff.

That might work on a podcast friendly to the left, but it is a harder act to pull off in communities dealing with the consequences of soft-on-crime policies and border anarchy.

Americans do not need a lecture from Sanders about what his movement supposedly believes. They can read the platforms, watch the rallies, and listen to the candidates he has helped elevate.

The radical left has told the country exactly what it wants: fewer immigration limits, weaker law enforcement, fewer consequences for criminals, and more government control over everyday life.

Republicans should not let Sanders get away with laundering socialism through soothing campaign season language.

If the Democratic Socialists want to abolish ICE, abolish prisons, and legalize migration, they should own it loudly and let voters decide whether that sounds like a sane country.

The more Sanders insists that no serious candidate believes these things, the more obvious the dodge becomes.

He is not refuting the radical agenda. He is trying to hide it before patriotic Americans send Democrats another message at the ballot box.

The left spent years chanting, marching, and fundraising on these ideas.

Now Bernie Sanders wants voters to believe it was all just a misunderstanding, which is quite a convenient story from the man who helped make socialism fashionable in the modern Democratic Party.

News

Rand Paul Says Fauci Contempt Vote Has Votes as DOJ Referral Looms [WATCH]

Sen. Rand Paul is moving quickly to turn Dr. Anthony Fauci’s silent Senate performance into a contempt fight, and the Kentucky Republican says he believes the votes are already lined up.

Paul, who chairs the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, is preparing a committee vote on whether to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress after the former top federal health official refused to answer questions under subpoena, as reported by Fox News.

Fauci appeared before the panel last week for what was expected to be a major confrontation over the federal government’s COVID-19 response, the Wuhan lab leak theory, and the risky research questions that have followed him for years.

Instead, the man who spent the pandemic lecturing Americans from every available television camera invoked the Fifth Amendment repeatedly and declined to answer lawmakers’ questions.

“I think there is a very good chance that we will win the vote,” Paul told Fox News Digital.

If the committee approves the contempt resolution, Paul said he intends to move fast and send the matter to the Department of Justice.

“The next step will be when we send the referral over directly to the Department of Justice,” he said.

Paul introduced the contempt resolution Tuesday. The measure states that once the committee reports it out, the matter would be referred to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia.

That would put the Biden-era health bureaucracy’s most famous face squarely in the hands of federal prosecutors, assuming the Justice Department is willing to treat congressional oversight like something more than an inconvenience.

Paul and Fauci have clashed for years over the origins of COVID 19, federal funding tied to research in China, and the public health decisions that reshaped American life during the pandemic.

For grassroots conservatives, the Paul and Fauci showdowns became one of the few moments in Washington where someone actually pressed the COVID establishment instead of applauding it.

The Kentucky Republican has accused Fauci of misleading the public and has argued that the former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director should face serious consequences.

Paul has also sought to force answers on whether the virus emerged from a laboratory in Wuhan, China, and whether federal money helped support dangerous research connected to that question.

Last week’s hearing was supposed to be the culmination of that long fight. Instead, Fauci’s lawyers advised him to refuse to answer, and he invoked his constitutional rights more than 100 times.

After making an opening statement explaining that he would not answer questions, Fauci said little beyond repeated invocations of the Fifth Amendment.

The silence immediately escalated the confrontation. Paul responded by preparing a contempt vote designed to compel testimony from a figure who has long been protected by media allies and praised by Democrats.

The issue is further complicated by former President Joe Biden’s pardon of Fauci before leaving office. Biden granted Fauci a full and unconditional pardon for actions taken from Jan. 1, 2014, through Jan. 19, 2025.

Paul suggested at the close of the hearing that the pardon may not settle every question surrounding Fauci’s refusal to testify.

“I think there’s another legal question that the courts may have to decide upon, and that is whether or not a presidential pardon offers you complete immunity,” Paul said as the hearing closed.

When asked to elaborate, Paul did not lay out the full argument publicly, but made clear the matter would be part of the referral.

“It’s a good legal discussion, and we will make those legal points to DOJ in sending the referral over,” Paul said.

Rand Paul Uncovers Private Messages Showing COVID Paper Authors Quietly Questioned Their Own Claims

The contempt push places Fauci back at the center of a debate many in Washington would rather bury. Millions of Americans remember the lockdowns, school closures, mandates, shifting guidance, and smug certainty from officials who rarely admitted error.

Paul’s move signals that Senate Republicans are not finished asking who knew what, who funded what, and why so many questions were treated like conspiracy theories until evidence made them impossible to ignore.

If the committee vote succeeds, the next test will be whether the Justice Department handles the referral seriously. Conservatives will be watching closely, because accountability in Washington has a funny way of disappearing when the target is a favored member of the liberal establishment.

For now, Paul is betting that the votes are there, the record is clear, and Fauci’s refusal to answer has only made the demand for answers louder.

News

MAGA Fury Explodes as Thune and Cotton Accused of Blocking Brennan Investigation [WATCH]

Conservative patience is running thin after Just the News editor-in-chief John Solomon said on “Steve Bannon’s War Room” that key Senate Republicans are sitting on materials sought by the Department of Justice in a major weaponization investigation, as reported by Trending Politics News.

The allegation is not aimed at Democrats this time, which makes it even more galling for the MAGA base. Solomon named Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senator Tom Cotton as the Republicans who have allegedly refused to turn over transcripts involving former CIA Director John Brennan.

“I’m going to go back to being a reporter for a second. I do not know this information from anything I’ve gained in government. I can tell you with 100% certainty that Republicans are obstructing the investigation into weaponization,” Solomon said.

That is the kind of sentence that lands like a brick in a movement that has spent years demanding answers about the Russia collusion hoax, the Steele dossier, and the permanent bureaucracy that treated Donald Trump like a target instead of a president.

Solomon said the records involve Brennan’s interviews before Senate committees, including materials investigators in Florida have been seeking for months. According to his account, the first request arrived in late January or early February, yet the documents still have not been provided.

“They have refused to do so,” Solomon said, referring to the Senate resistance. He added that the records could help prosecutors in Miami determine whether charges are warranted against Brennan.

That is no small matter. Brennan was a central figure in the intelligence world during the 2016 election aftermath, when the American people were fed years of Russia hysteria while the media acted like stenographers for the national security state.

The requested materials reportedly relate to the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment titled “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent U.S. Elections.” They also involve records connected to the Steele dossier, its place in the assessment, and the long-running claims about collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russian officials.

Just the News reported in April that Assistant Attorney General Patrick Davis sent letters seeking “fully unredacted copies of classified and unclassified transcripts of the Committee’s interviews, depositions, briefings, and hearings with any witnesses, as well as any written responses provided by witnesses.”

The letters said the materials were needed for official use in an ongoing law enforcement matter.

The deadline, according to that reporting, was February 23, 2026. By mid April, the Senate under Thune had still not transmitted the records, while the House had already voted to provide similar evidence.

Solomon blasted the situation as politically and practically absurd, and it is hard to argue with that if Republicans are serious about exposing weaponized government.

“There ought to be a grand jury subpoena sitting in the Senate clerk’s office, and there ought to be a court case yesterday compelling this because the Justice Department has been delayed by 8 months by 2 Republicans,” he said.

The investigation in Fort Pierce, Florida, reportedly centers on whether officials from the Obama and Biden administrations took part in a conspiracy involving law enforcement and intelligence tools. Former U.S. Attorney and Independent Counsel Joe diGenova has been described as playing a major role in the Florida effort.

For years, Republican voters were told to wait for the truth to come out. They were told committees were investigating, documents were being reviewed, and accountability was just around the corner.

Now, if Solomon’s reporting is accurate, two senior Republican senators are the ones standing between investigators and documents that could matter. That is exactly the kind of Beltway behavior that makes grassroots conservatives want to flip the whole mahogany table.

Cotton and Thune owe voters clear answers, not procedural fog and Senate club excuses. If Democrats had blocked records tied to a Trump-related investigation, the press corps would be hyperventilating into every available microphone.

The Justice Department also has questions to answer. Solomon noted that a subpoena could be used if the Senate refuses to comply, yet he said the acting Attorney General has not authorized one.

MAGA voters did not send Republicans to Washington so they could guard the same institutions that spent years smearing Trump and his supporters. If Brennan’s testimony matters, release it, subpoena it, or explain to the country why Republicans are helping keep it buried.

News

Church Arson Suspect Busted After Donut Theft Blunder at Midtown CVS [WATCH]

A suspected firebug accused of torching a 173-year-old Brooklyn church reportedly met his match in the snack aisle, where a simple shoplifting stop may have cracked open a far bigger case, as reported by The New York Post.

John Jones, 24, was taken into custody after an off-duty NYPD officer working security at a Midtown CVS allegedly spotted him trying to walk out with a turkey sandwich, donuts, and a Coke, sources said.

The late-night incident unfolded around 1:39 a.m. at the CVS on Broadway, where Jones allegedly attempted to help himself to a free meal. That plan, not exactly a criminal masterclass, quickly collapsed.

Once the officer detained him, police ran Jones through the system and discovered he was wanted on a warrant tied to the fire that gutted the South Bushwick Reformed Church, sources said.

Authorities had already been looking at Jones as the alleged arsonist behind the June 19 blaze, a three-alarm fire that ripped through the historic house of worship and left devastation behind.

The church was not some forgettable building tucked away on a random corner. It was a landmarked Brooklyn institution dating back 173 years, with generations of history inside its walls.

The fire destroyed the church’s historic spire and gutted much of the interior, leaving congregants suddenly without a place to worship. For a community built around faith, that loss hit far beyond bricks, pews, and stained glass.

Activists also said the blaze destroyed thousands of artifacts, adding another layer of damage to a case already soaked in destruction. History, worship, and neighborhood memory were all reduced to ash.

According to sources, investigators had surveillance footage showing the alleged culprit fleeing the church not long before flames broke out. That kind of timing tends to get law enforcement’s attention, even in a city where chaos is too often treated like background noise.

Jones is also expected to face unspecified federal charges in the Eastern District of New York, sources said. A federal complaint against him was expected to be unsealed Wednesday.

That suggests prosecutors may be preparing to treat the church fire as more than a routine local arson case. When a historic house of worship is allegedly targeted and destroyed, federal authorities tend to have questions.

Jones was not only on police radar for the church fire, according to sources. He was also hit with criminal mischief charges after allegedly smashing a television at DOC Wine, a Williamsburg restaurant, on June 28.

That incident caused about $900 in damages, sources said. Apparently, the alleged pattern here was not exactly subtle, with destruction following close behind.

It remained unclear from the available information exactly what charges Jones faced in connection with the latest arrest. Still, the sequence of events was striking enough on its own.

A suspect wanted in a major church arson investigation was not brought in after some dramatic manhunt or elaborate sting. He was reportedly caught because an alert cop noticed a late-night grab for donuts and a sandwich.

Credit where it is due, that off-duty officer did what too many big city officials pretend is no longer necessary. He paid attention to the small crime, and it may have led police straight to a suspect in a very big one.

For ordinary New Yorkers, the case is another reminder that so-called minor disorder is not harmless. Sometimes the guy allegedly shoplifting at CVS is also the man authorities suspect of burning down a historic church.

The South Bushwick Reformed Church is now left to deal with the wreckage of a fire that tore through nearly two centuries of history. Its congregation is left waiting for justice while prosecutors prepare the next step.

Jones, meanwhile, was reportedly undone by donuts. In a city drowning in excuses for criminals, it took one watchful officer and one very dumb alleged theft to bring a major suspect into custody.


Scroll to Top