Author name: LifeZette

News

Peter Navarro Says Hydroxychloroquine Was Ready; Fauci Slammed the Brakes Despite Diary Confession [WATCH]

White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said he believes hydroxychloroquine was an effective early COVID-19 treatment and accused former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci of helping prevent its widespread distribution during the pandemic.

Navarro made the remarks while reflecting on disagreements he said he had with Fauci during the Trump administration’s response to COVID-19.

He began by acknowledging that many people remain skeptical of the medication.

“Is hydroxychloroquine? I would guess, not knowing your views on this, that you think hydroxychloroquine is is a quack medicine.”

Navarro then explained why he disagrees with that assessment.

“But let me tell you this: this is one of the many fights I had with Tony Fauci.”

According to Navarro, later research has reinforced his view of the drug’s safety and usefulness.

“Hydroxychloroquine, we now know going forward with all the studies, is number one, it’s a very safe medicine.”

He also argued that the medication has value as a preventive treatment.

“Number two, it’s particularly effective for prophylaxis, which which helps first responders.”

Navarro added that he believes the drug can provide benefits when administered early in the course of an infection.

“And number three, it has a it has a decent benefit in the first seven days of an infection.”

Navarro said the Trump administration had already acquired a large supply of the medication that he intended to distribute nationwide.

“So, I had a million tablets of hydroxy sitting in warehouses, ready to be dispensed to the American people.”

He argued that the medication could have saved many lives if distribution had moved forward.

“And I take this to the bank peers. If I had been able to do that, 1000’s of Americans would be alive.”

Navarro then explained why he believes the medication was never broadly distributed.

“Now, where does Fauci come into this?” And this is where the blame is.”

According to Navarro, Fauci initially supported the use of hydroxychloroquine during the early weeks of the pandemic.

“In March of 2020, Fauci, in his diary, several diary entries is on record saying that hydroxychloroquine is very very safe.”

Navarro said Fauci initially favored making the drug widely available.

“He wanted it distributed immediately.”

Navarro contrasted that with Fauci’s position on remdesivir.

“He wanted remdesivir to be to go through trials, not the other way around. And he was all for it.”

Navarro argued that Fauci’s position changed after President Donald Trump publicly endorsed hydroxychloroquine.

“The politics changed radically when President Trump said, ‘Hey, let’s try hydroxychloroquine.’ There was like a this just mass insanity in the left wing media.”

Navarro said Fauci changed his position as public debate intensified.

“Fauci flipped with that.”

He also alleged Fauci influenced federal regulators to prevent broader distribution of the medication.

“And he was part of the pressure on the FDA to prevent this administration and me specifically from able being able to do what I did.”

Navarro said he continues to hold Fauci responsible for what he believes was a missed opportunity during the pandemic.

“So when you ask me, do I give any slack to Tony Fauci? I say, absolutely not.”

WATCH:

News

Florida vs. the Swamp: AG Uthmeier Battles Biden Judge Who Shut Down Citizenship Voting Checks [WATCH]

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier said the state is continuing its legal fight to preserve access to a federal citizenship verification database that he argues is essential for protecting election integrity and prosecuting voter fraud.

Uthmeier made the remarks while discussing a case involving allegations of illegal voting by a non-citizen and the state’s ongoing efforts to maintain access to the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database.

According to Uthmeier, the individual in the case “faces two thirds degree felonies, voting by a non-citizen elector, and false affirmation, and up to 10 years in prison.”

He said the investigation relied on the federal database used to verify citizenship status.

“Building this case was possible because of the Save database, which allows states to look up citizenship data and ensure only Americans vote in our elections.”

Uthmeier noted that Florida reached an agreement with the Department of Homeland Security last year that expanded the state’s access to the database.

“Last year, Florida signed a landmark agreement with the Department of Homeland Security that requires free access to the Save database with improved search capabilities.”

He added that the agreement was intended to provide long-term certainty for the state’s election officials.

“That agreement is judicially enforceable for 20 years.”

“Future administrations cannot walk away from it.”

Uthmeier then criticized a recent court ruling that he said interrupted the state’s ability to use the database.

“Yet Biden-appointed Judge Sparkle Spookanan overstepped her authority and blocked access to the Save database.”

According to Uthmeier, the ruling has made it more difficult for Florida to verify voter eligibility.

“Her activist ruling makes it harder to verify citizenship and slows our ability to hold aliens accountable for stealing votes in Florida elections.”

He said the state is challenging the order in court.

“But no, we will not back down, and we are currently fighting her unlawful order in court to protect the integrity of every American ballot.”

Uthmeier argued that verifying citizenship is a key part of maintaining confidence in the election system and enforcing Florida’s election laws.

He said the state intends to continue pursuing cases involving alleged election fraud and will seek to hold offenders accountable under existing law.

Uthmeier emphasized that Florida’s legal challenge is focused on restoring access to the SAVE database and preserving what he described as an important tool for election officials and law enforcement.

He concluded by reiterating the state’s position on election-related offenses.

“Here in Florida, we do and will always take election fraud seriously, and we will hold violators accountable.”

WATCH:

News

Useful Idiot Liberal Professor Recoils as Mamdani Tax Machine Comes for His Property [WATCH]

Scott Galloway, the left wing commentator and NYU professor who has made a comfortable brand out of blasting President Trump and nodding along with big government politics, is suddenly discovering something conservatives have warned about for years.

The government machine does not stay aimed only at the people you dislike.

Galloway is now objecting after New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s administration published a searchable database tied to a proposed pied à terre tax, aimed at owners of valuable second residences in the city.

The irony is thick enough to pave Fifth Avenue.

According to the report, the database was released by the city’s Department of Finance and allows users to search properties while viewing the names and addresses of owners whose non primary residences could fall under the proposed tax.

A department spokesperson reportedly said the publication of the property roll was required by state law, which is the usual bureaucratic shrug when government decides ordinary privacy is optional.

Galloway, who apparently had no problem with aggressive left-wing taxation in theory, sounded a little less enchanted once his own name landed in the government spotlight.

“I’ve been doxed,” the liberal professor announced on the podcast.

He continued, “I don’t know if you’ve heard, but Mayor Mamdani has decided to release a list of the 950,000 residences with addresses and names that might be eligible for his pied à terre tax.”

That is the thing about class warfare politics, it sounds bold and righteous at cocktail parties until the mob starts reading from a list that includes your address.

Co host Kara Swisher, not exactly a voice from the conservative wilderness, also seemed uncomfortable with the move.

“I don’t love this,” Swisher said.

“I can’t say I love this. It feels a little bit like doxing. Just tax them and get on with it is my feeling.”

That comment captures the mindset perfectly.

The problem, in her view, is apparently not the punitive tax grab itself, but the messy public naming part that makes the ruling class feel a little exposed.

For years, the left has sold tax hikes as moral theater, where successful people are cast as villains and politicians ride in as heroes with spreadsheets.

Now Mamdani’s administration appears to have added a public shaming component, and some of the same people who cheered big government are noticing that bureaucrats are not famous for restraint.

Galloway was especially sharp in describing the city’s approach.

“He’s taken a legitimate source of tax revenue, and he’s turning it into a wanted poster,” he said of Mamdani’s tax list.

WATCH:

Galloway also questioned the point of putting names and addresses in front of the public, especially in a political climate where anger can move quickly from online outrage to real world danger.

That concern is not hard to understand, even if it is rich coming from a political universe that routinely treats privacy and due process as inconveniences when the target is on the right.

The Mamdani administration’s database reportedly focuses on owners who may be subject to the proposed tax on valuable second homes.

In practical terms, that means the city is taking a revenue proposal and attaching to it a public list that critics say could invite harassment or worse.

Conservatives have long argued that once government gets addicted to targeting disfavored groups, it rarely stops where its cheerleaders promised.

Today it is wealthy second home owners, tomorrow it can be small landlords, business owners, political donors, or anyone else who becomes useful in the next campaign speech.

There is also a deeper lesson here for blue city voters who keep empowering politicians who see private property as a piggy bank.

When voters hand power to ideologues who believe government should punish success, they should not act shocked when those ideologues start building tools to identify exactly who owns what.

Galloway’s sudden discomfort is revealing because it shows how quickly abstract left wing policy becomes personal when the tax collector turns up at the professor’s own door.

He is not wrong to be alarmed about a government list that can be searched by name and address, but he is late to the party.

The conservative critique has always been simple.

Government power does not become safer just because the person wielding it uses progressive slogans.

Mamdani’s tax push may have been packaged as another hit on the wealthy, but the backlash from Galloway shows that even liberals can recognize a warning flare when it lands on their own lawn.

For New Yorkers already tired of being treated like walking revenue streams, this episode is another reminder that left wing governance always starts with promises of fairness and somehow ends with more taxes, more lists, and less privacy.

News

Three Dead After Idaho In N Out Bloodbath as Gunman Opens Fire, Armed Citizen Steps In [WATCH]

A brand new In N Out Burger in Twin Falls, Idaho, became the scene of a sickening Saturday rampage when a gunman opened fire, killing two people and wounding several others before dying himself.

The shooting erupted around 2 p.m. local time, sending families, employees, and customers scrambling for cover in the kind of chaos no community should have to endure.

Police later said the dead included the shooter, whose motive was still under investigation.

Twin Falls Police Chief Matthew Hicks said investigators were still working to confirm the number of people injured.

He also said authorities believed “the threat to the community is over,” a phrase that brought some relief after an afternoon of terror.

Jerome Police Chief Duane Rubink told CNN that early indications pointed to one shooter, who died from a self-inflicted gunshot.

In other words, the coward apparently ended his own life after destroying the lives of innocent people.

Witness Lane Koehn, 34, told the Associated Press he was stopped at a traffic light near the restaurant when he saw the violence unfold.

He described seeing a person carrying what appeared to be an AR style rifle coming from the drive thru area.

Koehn said another man armed with a pistol fired at the suspect.

He also watched an employee rush to help a wounded coworker, dragging the woman across the parking lot after she had reportedly been shot in the chest.

“She was pretty bad off, but I don’t know. I hope she made it,” Koehn told the AP.

He estimated hearing three or four shots and said he could not tell whether the attacker was targeting someone specific.

In N Out President Lynsi Snyder confirmed that one company associate was killed in the attack.

“We lost one of our beautiful Associates tonight,” Snyder said in a statement.

Snyder said the employee had been serving customers when her life was taken by what she called a disgusting person who did not value anyone else’s life or his own.

That is about as plain and accurate as it gets, despite the usual excuse machine always waiting nearby to explain away evil.

Police responded to the restaurant parking lot for what authorities described as an active shooter situation.


Cellphone video from inside a nearby vehicle showed a man in a black T shirt and blue pants standing between two parked Teslas while aiming what looked like a rifle toward a blue vehicle.

Two shots rang out in rapid succession, with muzzle flashes visible on the recording.

The armed man then lowered the weapon, walked away quickly, and broke into a run across the parking lot while still carrying the firearm.

The person recording the video could be heard whispering, “Oh my gosh” just before the shots were fired.

Moments later, as the suspected gunman moved away, the camera dropped as the person appeared to duck, while a panicked voice said, “Get down … I don’t have service.”

Another video taken from a vehicle stopped at a red light on Blue Lakes Boulevard North captured people running across the street as gunfire cracked in the background.

The camera turned toward the In N Out, where a person in dark clothing appeared near a white sedan in the drive thru lane while holding a long firearm.

WATCH:

“He got more in the back,” one occupant said as the armed person leaned into the sedan and later opened its rear hatch.

A witness then said it looked like “something bigger” as the person removed another long object from the vehicle.

As the vehicle sped away, one person shouted out the window, “Hey! Stop shooting! Stop shooting, bitch!”

It was a raw moment of panic, anger, and disbelief in a parking lot that had been packed with ordinary Americans just trying to grab a meal.

Authorities shut down the Perrine Bridge and nearby roads while businesses in a shopping center went into lockdown.

The Magic Valley Mall also locked down, and St. Luke’s Magic Valley urged people not to come to the hospital unless they had an emergency.

The hospital said its emergency department remained open and was working with police and emergency responders while the situation developed.

Investigators were also moving hundreds of witnesses to different locations for interviews, a massive undertaking after a violent attack in a busy public area.

A nearby chicken restaurant closed for the rest of the day out of caution.

Idaho Gov. Brad Little urged residents to “avoid the area and follow directions from law enforcement as they work to keep everyone safe.”

The FBI said it was aware of the shooting and was offering assistance to local law enforcement.

The Twin Falls In N Out had opened only one week earlier, welcoming its first customers on July 25 before this nightmare ripped through the community.

“We are heartbroken,” In N Out COO Denny Warnick said in a statement.

For the victims, their families, and the shaken people of Twin Falls, Saturday will not be remembered as the opening week of a popular restaurant, but as the day a murderous thug turned a normal afternoon into a crime scene.

News

Dana Perino Corners Francesca Hong Over Radical Police Abolition Record [WATCH]

Wisconsin Democratic gubernatorial candidate Francesca Hong ran into a problem Friday that every radical eventually meets.

Her record followed her onto live television, and Fox News host Dana Perino did not let her simply sprint past it.

Hong appeared on America’s Newsroom as her campaign tries to pitch a softer, more voter-friendly message.

The trouble is that her past comments on police, ICE, and even the United States Senate are not exactly small footnotes.

Perino pressed Hong on old statements backing defunding police, abolishing police, eliminating ICE, and taking aim at core American institutions.

For a candidate now trying to look ready for statewide office, that is a lot of socialist baggage to drag into a governor’s race.

Hong is a state representative and a dues paying member of the Democratic Socialists of America.

She confirmed that she has belonged to the Madison chapter since 2020, which is not ancient history no matter how much campaign consultants may wish it were.

When Perino asked why voters should not take her at her own word on abolishing police, Hong tried to pivot to economics.

“As a Democratic Socialist, what that means is I want to put working class people first,” Hong said.

Perino did not let the talking point float away untouched.

“How does defunding the police put working class people first?” Perino asked, cutting straight to the obvious question many Wisconsin families would probably like answered before handing Hong the keys to the governor’s office.

WATCH:

Hong’s record is not vague.

In a 2020 post first reported by CNN, she wrote that she supported “defunding the police as a first step towards abolishing the police.”

She went even further in 2021 with rhetoric that sounded like it came straight from an activist meeting rather than a serious public safety debate.

“Police exist to uphold white supremacy,” Hong wrote in 2021.

“Defund then abolish. Reform can’t be an option.”

On Friday, Hong tried to inch away from that record without actually repudiating it.

She told Perino she believes “people can evolve,” which is the kind of phrase politicians reach for when the old posts are too toxic to defend but too ideologically precious to disown.

Hong then offered a carefully worded assurance about what she would do as governor.

“The governor cannot defund the police, and I won’t defund the police,” Hong said.

“But I will invest in the things we know prevent crime.”

That answer may sound neat in a studio, but voters are allowed to notice the maneuver.

Saying a governor lacks the power to defund police is not the same as admitting the original idea was reckless, destructive, and insulting to law abiding communities.

Hong also tried to create distance between herself and some of the Democratic Socialists of America’s more sweeping demands.

She rejected the idea of abolishing the United States Senate as impractical for now and declined to endorse eliminating the Supreme Court.

For conservatives, that is hardly comforting.

When the moderation pitch is that abolishing the Senate is not practical at the moment, the bar has been buried somewhere deep under the Capitol lawn.

Republican Rep. Tom Tiffany, the GOP front runner in the governor’s race, has been hammering Hong over the same record.

His campaign argues that Hong is not being newly reasonable, she is simply trying to clean up a paper trail that does not play well outside the activist left.

Hong currently leads recent polling in the crowded Democrat primary, which is scheduled for August 11.

That says plenty about where the party’s energy is right now, and it is not exactly in the neighborhood of law and order.

The police issue is not the only radical marker on her record.

Hong has called ICE the “enforcers of fascism” and has reportedly floated using the National Guard to arrest federal agents, a position that would make even some hardened leftist strategists reach for the aspirin.

Days before the Fox interview, Hong reportedly dodged repeated questions from a Politico reporter about whether she still supports abolishing police.

Instead, she offered winding answers about building “systems of care,” which sounds lovely until someone calls 911 and needs an officer, not a slogan.

Perino’s interview put the matter in plain view.

Hong wants voters to focus on her polished campaign message, but her own words keep pointing back to a much more radical agenda.

News

Trans Funeral Director Accused in $2.2M Estate Theft Erupts After Organ Bucket Questions [WATCH]

A Houston funeral home director accused in a staggering estate theft case walked into court Friday facing a pile of felony charges, then walked out acting like the cameras were there for a red carpet premiere.

Unique Mica Green Battle is accused of forging a web of documents to seize control of more than $2.2 million from the estate of Lawrence Gammon, a deceased man whose name is now attached to one of the stranger probate scandals in recent memory.

According to reporting from Fox 26, investigators say the paperwork used in the scheme included a fake will, a falsified death certificate, forged probate records, and fraudulent filings designed to make Green Battle appear to be Gammon’s spouse and successor.

That is not a paperwork error. That is the kind of allegation that turns a funeral business into the center of a major fraud investigation.

The case took an even darker turn in November 2025, when police executed a search warrant at Green Battle’s funeral home after families raised accusations that the business was mishandling bodies and committing fraud.

During that search, investigators reportedly found human organs in a bucket, along with boxes of cremated remains.

Even in an era where the public has learned to expect bureaucratic incompetence and institutional rot, that detail lands like something from a nightmare.

Authorities also say Green Battle had been operating the funeral business without a valid license.

The license reportedly expired in 2021 and was revoked in August 2025, yet the business allegedly continued functioning anyway.

For families already grieving loved ones, the idea that a funeral home was operating under those circumstances is not merely disturbing.

It is a betrayal at the most vulnerable possible moment.

Green Battle, described in court records under both male and female listings dating back years, appeared before a judge Friday.

The judge set bond at $800,000, and Green Battle was released after posting it.

If anyone expected humility outside the courtroom, they got the opposite.

Green Battle met reporters with a performance that was equal parts arrogance, deflection, and tabloid chaos.

“I’m on the news. I’m a celebrity. I don’t have anything to say.”

Reporters pressed forward with questions, including the obvious ones that any sane person would ask after allegations involving forged estate documents, mishandled remains, and organs found in a bucket.

Green Battle then snapped, “Get that out of my face b*tch,” before shouting, “I don’t have nothing to say!”

That was followed by insults about a reporter’s fashion choices, because apparently answering basic questions about a multimillion dollar estate case was too much to ask.

The spectacle did not stop there.

Green Battle declared, “I’m such a celebrity. I’m a celebrity,” then fired back at reporters by saying “your mom forged [documents].”

When one reporter asked where the organs allegedly found by investigators came from, the response was as vile as it was bizarre.

“They were for you to eat for lunch. Stupid b*tch, they were for you to eat.”

WATCH:

Police had already been digging into the business before Friday’s court appearance.

Initial reporting from November showed Houston police executing warrants at the property and seizing financial records as well as cremated remains.

Houston Police Department Lt. Larry Crowson said the investigation centered on “identity theft involving the identities of the deceased person,” with authorities examining whether information from funeral contracts was used to defraud families.

That allegation is especially chilling because funeral homes are trusted with intensely personal information at a time when families are least prepared to detect fraud.

If the accusations are proven, the setup would be as predatory as it gets.

The political class loves to lecture Americans about trust, credentials, regulation, and compassion, but ordinary citizens keep seeing cases where the systems supposedly protecting them fail spectacularly.

Here, a revoked license, grieving families, forged documents, and human remains all appear in the same story.

WATCH:

The charges against Green Battle will now proceed through the court system, where prosecutors will have to prove the fraud allegations and the full scope of what happened at the funeral business.

For now, Houston families are left with ugly questions about who had access to their loved ones, what was done with remains, and how a person under this kind of scrutiny could stroll out of court calling himself a celebrity.

News

Denver Jews Sound Alarm as Socialist Melat Kiros Rides Anti Israel Wave [WATCH]

Denver’s Jewish community is sounding the alarm after democratic socialist Melat Kiros pulled off a stunning primary win in Colorado’s 1st Congressional District, knocking off longtime Rep. Diana DeGette and sending another loud message about where the activist left is dragging the Democratic Party.

Kiros, 29, was celebrated by progressive groups after defeating the 15 term incumbent in June.

But for Jewish leaders in Denver, the victory did not feel like some charming grassroots moment. It felt like a warning flare.

Their concern centers on Kiros’ record of inflammatory remarks about Israel and the Oct. 7 terror attacks.

She has described those attacks as “inevitable,” accused Israel of genocide and apartheid, and initially refused to call a deadly Boulder firebombing an antisemitic attack.

Rabbi Menachem Lehrfield, director of the Jewish Outreach Initiative in Denver, said the result left many observant Jews feeling exposed in their own city.

After posting online about his fear, he was met with antisemitic comments, then wrote publicly about how simply wearing a yarmulke in Denver now feels dangerous.

One day later, Lehrfield said that fear became painfully real.

“I was walking down the street right here, right outside this building, and somebody rolled down their window and yelled, ‘dirty Jew,’ to me,” he told Fox News Digital.

“I don’t know what’s going to happen next time. I don’t know if next time, instead of hurling vile words, they’ll be hurling an explosive like the person who killed Karen Diamond in Boulder. I don’t know if they’re going to do something to me or my family or my community. There’s a real fear that we’re living with,” he said.

“What I’m most afraid of is the fact that so many of the people in my community, so many people in the district, voted for her,” Lehrfield added.

That is the uncomfortable part Democrats do not want to discuss while their socialist wing keeps getting treated like the future of the party.

The fear is not theoretical in Colorado.

In June 2025, 82 year old Karen Diamond was killed and a dozen others were injured when prosecutors say Mohamed Sabry Soliman threw Molotov cocktails into a peaceful pro Israel gathering on Boulder’s Pearl Street Mall.

Authorities charged Soliman, an illegal immigrant, with murder and hate crimes.

Prosecutors said he yelled “Free Palestine” and spent a year planning the attack to “kill all Zionist people.”

Yet when Kiros was asked about the Boulder attack during a 9News interview, she condemned the violence but would not call it antisemitic, saying she did not “know what was in the heart of the perpetrator.”

That kind of evasive word salad might play well in left wing activist circles, but Jewish leaders in Denver heard it loud and clear.

Brandon Rattiner, senior director of the Jewish Community Relations Council, said Kiros’ answer deeply wounded the community.

“Kiros’s inability to call the Boulder firebombing an antisemitic attack was extremely frustrating and difficult for our community to hear,” he told Fox News Digital.

“The impact here was pretty clear: A Jewish person was killed, over a dozen were hurt, and it was one of the biggest and most prominent antisemitic attacks on Jews throughout the world,” Rattiner said.

He added that the failure to show basic care and empathy was “incredibly hurtful to hear.”

Rattiner said he met with Kiros before the primary and thought the conversation had been constructive.

Then, he said, she appeared on anti Israel streamer Hasan Piker’s livestream and “did the opposite of everything that we had discussed.”

“I had asked for nuance and she spoke in absolutist positions,” Rattiner said.

“I had asked for empathy and compassion, and she seemed to only allow that for one side of the conflict.”

Susan Rona, regional director for the Anti Defamation League Mountain States Region, warned that political rhetoric has real world consequences.

“When political leaders refuse to name something as a targeted antisemitic attack, it creates some distrust of leadership and causes additional fear because it minimizes and causes dehumanization of Jews, which leads to violence,” she said.

“We’re seeing that pretty clearly in Colorado,” Rona continued.

“There’s a direct line to all this antisemitic rhetoric we’re hearing and violence happening toward the Jewish community.”

WATCH:

According to the ADL, antisemitic incidents in Colorado have surged to the third highest level recorded since the group began tracking them in 1979.

The group counted 167 incidents in 2025, a staggering jump from fewer than 12 in the region a decade earlier.

Kiros’ campaign has been backed by the Democratic Socialists of America, Justice Democrats, and the Working Families Party.

The DSA has embraced Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions against Israel and has declared Zionism equivalent to racism, which tells voters plenty about the ideological neighborhood we are dealing with here.

A Jewish independent candidate, Dr. Shimon Blau, has now entered the general election race.

He told the Denverite, “I believe in human rights for everyone,” adding, “I am absolutely not a socialist.”

Republican Christy Peterson is also running, though the district remains heavily Democratic.

Still, Kiros’ rise has already exposed a serious rupture inside the left, where anti Israel rhetoric is no longer fringe coffeehouse chatter but an organizing principle for candidates seeking power in Congress.

Kiros, Blau, and the DSA did not return Fox News Digital’s requests for comment.

Funny how the loudest political movements often go quiet when asked to answer for the fear they leave behind.

News

Gavin Newsom’s Sham Tax Return Release Ignites Fury Over Handpicked Media Access [WATCH]

California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s long-awaited tax return reveal landed with all the transparency of a locked filing cabinet.

After months of pressure, the governor finally let a select group of media outlets inspect hundreds of pages of documents, but only under rules that looked more like damage control than disclosure.

The California Post reported that Newsom allowed favored outlets to review 718 pages of tax records in Sacramento, while forbidding copies and limiting reporters to pen and paper.

The governor, who loves lecturing everyone else about openness, was not there to answer questions.

That private showing came after Newsom had promised to make four years of tax records public.

Instead, the public got a filtered version through outlets that were given special access while others, including The Post, were left outside the room.

The staged release sparked immediate criticism from Republicans who said Newsom was trying to claim the halo of transparency without actually doing the transparent part.

For a governor with national ambitions, that is not exactly a confidence building exercise.

“If the governor is truly committed to transparency, it makes little sense to pick and choose who that transparency extends to,” US Rep. Kevin Kiley, a former state legislator, told The Post.

Scott Meyers, a GOP candidate for Congress in California’s 30th Congressional District, added The Post: “If you want voters to trust you as a steward of their tax dollars, you should welcome that level of scrutiny.”

The records, according to notes taken by the chosen outlets, show Newsom and his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, reported hefty annual income while presenting a far more carefully crafted public image.

WATCH:

The couple brought in between 1.7 million dollars and 2 million dollars annually from 2022 through 2024.

The filings also showed the couple paid household staff nearly 200,000 dollars and wrote off Armani clothing that had originally cost about 45,000 dollars.

They later valued the donated clothing at 4,900 dollars when giving it to an Oakland restorative justice nonprofit, according to the Times.

Newsom also reported author income from his recent memoir, “Young Man in a Hurry.”

He collected 70,000 dollars in 2023 and another 75,000 dollars in 2024, not bad for a politician who tries to package himself as the scrappy underdog of California politics.

In 2021, the couple reported 3.5 million dollars in taxable income, boosted by roughly 1 million dollars from the sale of their home in wealthy Marin County.

Newsom’s official governor salary was only a slice of the family’s earnings, with much of the money tied to winery, restaurant and hospitality businesses placed in a blind trust after he took office.

The returns reportedly do not identify which individual businesses produced profits or losses.

That detail matters, especially when the same politician has spent years insisting that public officials should bare their finances for voters to inspect.

The filings also showed Siebel Newsom’s feminist film production company losing money.

Girls Club Entertainment lost about 37,000 dollars in 2022, while she reported just 11,700 dollars in earnings from the business, according to the Times.

At the same time, Siebel Newsom has reportedly collected at least 150,000 dollars per year from her nonprofit, The Representation Project, which promotes her films and related initiatives.

For ordinary Californians crushed by the cost of living, that setup may look a bit different from the glossy moral branding.

Newsom has long sold himself as a champion of financial disclosure.

During his 2018 run for governor, he released years of returns going back to 2011, then signed a 2019 law requiring gubernatorial candidates to disclose five years of federal returns before appearing on California’s primary ballot.

He also promised to keep releasing his own returns each year while in office. Yet until Friday, the public had not received tax records covering the years after 2020.

When The Post asked about the missing returns earlier this month, Newsom sounded surprised.

“I know you love taxes,” the governor joked, before turning to his favorite political security blanket, President Donald Trump.

Newsom insisted he had released his taxes “for decades,” and his office later said the newer filings would be shared by the end of July.

What his office did not say was that certain outlets had already been contacted and allowed to inspect the documents first.

His office tried to wave off the controversy by saying the filings were nothing special.

“They’re unremarkable and entirely consistent with what Californians already know from his annual Form 700 disclosures,” spokesperson Diana Crofts Pelayo previously told The Post.

“The governor publicly released his tax returns while he was on the ballot and is happy to go above and beyond by releasing the remaining years as well.”

The timing only adds to the scrutiny.

Newsom recently disclosed that he and his wife are subjects of a federal investigation, which he claims is politically motivated, while a source previously told The Post that one inquiry is examining Jennifer Siebel Newsom’s taxes.

Federal investigators also separately examined former Newsom chief of staff Dana Williamson, who pleaded guilty in May to conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud, filing a false tax return and lying to the FBI.

For a governor testing the waters for 2028, this carefully managed tax show may raise more questions than it answers.

News

Kamala Harris Humiliates Herself While Teasing Radical 2028 Power Grab [WATCH]

Kamala Harris is back on the national stage, and somehow the former vice president managed to remind voters why her last presidential run ended in political rubble.

Speaking Friday at the National Urban League Conference in Nashville, Harris offered a preview of what a 2028 campaign could look like if Democrats decide to take another ride on the Kamala roller coaster.

The theme was not subtle. Harris floated a sweeping leftist wish list that would radically reshape American government, including eliminating the Electoral College, packing the Supreme Court, pushing statehood for Washington DC and Puerto Rico, and scrapping the Senate filibuster.

When asked whether she plans to run for president again, Harris did not formally announce a campaign.

Instead, she gave Democrats a warning about the midterms.

“2028 will not matter if we don’t win 2026,” Harris said.

That line may have been intended as a rallying cry, but it also sounded like a reminder that Democrats know their agenda is in deep trouble if voters show up in 2026.

Harris then leaned into the kind of institutional power grab that has become standard fare on the modern left.

If they cannot win under the current rules, they simply demand new rules.

“We need to revisit the point of expanding the court to 13 justices, like we have 13 district courts. We need to revisit, if they so want, statehood for Puerto Rico and DC,” Harris said.

There was just one glaring problem with that statement.

The United States does not have 13 district courts.

America has 89 federal district courts across the 50 states, along with additional district courts in the territories.

WATCH:

The number Harris appeared to be searching for was 13 appellate circuit courts, which is a fairly significant distinction for someone who is a lawyer and was one heartbeat from the presidency.

For most Americans, mixing up the structure of the federal judiciary might be an understandable mistake.

For Kamala Harris, who wants to redesign the Supreme Court because Democrats are angry they do not control it, the blunder was more than a little embarrassing.

The court packing push is not about justice, balance, or democracy, no matter how many times Democrats dress it up with focus group language.

It is about adding seats until the left gets the rulings it wants.

Harris also revived the Democratic dream of eliminating the Electoral College, a move that would require a constitutional amendment.

That inconvenient detail rarely slows down the party that treats constitutional limits as speed bumps on the road to permanent power.

Add statehood for DC and Puerto Rico to the list, and the strategy becomes even clearer.

Democrats want more friendly senators, more electoral votes, and fewer checks on their agenda.

Harris also attacked Tennessee’s congressional map, accusing the state of racism over its redistricting decision.

“They backdoored racism through politics in that decision,” Harris said.

That kind of rhetoric is now the default setting for Democrats when state lawmakers draw maps they do not like.

If Republicans follow the law and win, the left reaches for the racism accusation before anyone can finish the sentence.

Then Harris made another dramatic claim, accusing the Trump Administration of causing mass death by shuttering USAID.

She offered no proof for the staggering figure she cited.

“It’s so unbelievable that they got rid of USAID! As many as 600,000 to 700,000 people have died because of withdrawing American aid for humanitarian purposes!” Harris said.

WATCH:

A claim that massive should come with serious evidence, not just a conference stage and the familiar Kamala delivery.

But in Democratic politics, big numbers and bigger accusations often do the work that facts apparently cannot.

The Nashville appearance gave voters a useful glimpse of what Harris 2028 could mean.

More attacks on American institutions, more demands to rewrite the rules, more racial politics, and more sweeping claims aimed at blaming Trump for every crisis on earth.

For conservatives, the event was less a campaign preview than a warning label.

Kamala Harris may not have announced for 2028, but she certainly showed the country the radical blueprint Democrats are eager to run on if they get the chance.

News

Major New Stock Exchange Opens, and It’s Nowhere Near Wall Street [WATCH]

The Texas Stock Exchange officially went live Friday in Dallas, giving America a new major market venue and giving Wall Street another reminder that the center of economic gravity is not glued to Manhattan forever.

The Dallas-based exchange opened trading for all of its listed tickers, marking the first new major stock exchange launch in the United States in decades.

That is no small Texas-sized footnote.

The TXSE is aiming directly at the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq Composite, the longtime giants of American listings.

The message from Dallas is simple enough, Texas is open for business, and the old coastal club now has competition.

The exchange is backed by serious financial muscle, including BlackRock, Goldman Sachs and Charles Schwab.

In other words, this is not some courthouse square publicity stunt, no matter how badly the usual coastal skeptics may want to pretend otherwise.

TXSE plans to begin corporate listings later this year, then move into initial public offerings starting in 2027.

The exchange sees Texas and the broader South as the “center of gravity for American capitalism”, a phrase that sounds less like marketing and more like a plain reading of the map.

The exchange is leaning into what it calls the “Boom Belt”, a fast growing region that has been pulling jobs, capital and people away from states where taxes and regulations seem designed by people allergic to prosperity.

“As the only primary corporate and ETP listings venue built and headquartered in the Boom Belt, TXSE is both a product of the region’s rise and a catalyst to accelerate it,” TXSE explained.

The numbers help explain why Dallas is suddenly looking like more than just a challenger.

According to the exchange, the region has an annualized GDP of $8.9 trillion, larger than every world economy except the United States and China.

WATCH:

The TXSE also says 40 percent of American exports move through the Boom Belt, while 57 percent of United States job growth over the last five years has happened there.

That is the sort of statistic that tends to make California tax planners reach for another committee hearing.

For now, the exchange is operating out of temporary offices in the Uptown neighborhood of Dallas.

A bell ringing ceremony was scheduled for Friday afternoon to mark the official launch, because even Texas knows Wall Street does not own all the theater.

The permanent home will be inside the Bank of America Tower, where TXSE plans to operate the Texas Market Center.

Once completed, the tower is expected to be the tallest building in Uptown Dallas.

The Texas Market Center is set to include executive offices, a Texas business museum and a broadcast studio.

Designer KPF said in May that the exchange will occupy multiple areas of the building, including ground floor space and a 12th floor sky lobby.

The launch comes as Texas keeps attracting companies looking for a better place to locate headquarters or incorporate.

Lower taxes, friendlier rules and a more practical political climate have become a powerful sales pitch, especially compared with California and New York.

The old guard has noticed. The New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq have both opened exchanges in Texas, offering companies the chance to dual list on the new duplicate venues at no cost.

That reaction tells the real story.

When the giants start planting flags in Texas, it is because they know the money, talent and ambition are moving.

Wall Street is not vanishing tomorrow, but its monopoly on prestige is taking a hit.

Y’all Street is no longer a punchline, it is a live market in Dallas with heavyweight backing and a very Texas sized appetite for growth.


Scroll to Top