Author name: LifeZette

Sports, Uncategorized

Illegal Immigrants Linked to NFL Star’s Mansion Break-In 

/

Four illegal immigrants from Chile were arrested earlier this month for their suspected role in the December break-in at NFL star Joe Burrow’s Ohio mansion.

As reported by TMZ., the arrests, made on January 10, expose yet another troubling example of how unchecked illegal immigration allows international criminals to prey on law-abiding citizens.

Court documents reveal that during a traffic stop in Ohio, police discovered evidence tying the suspects to the December 9 burglary.

Among the items found were an LSU shirt and a Bengals ballcap believed to have been stolen from Burrow’s property.

Investigators also seized Husky automatic center punch tools, often used by the South American Theft Group to shatter glass and gain access to homes.

Cellphone data provided another smoking gun: one of the suspects’ devices was traced to Burrow’s residence during the burglary.

The four men—identified as Alexander Chavez, Bastian Morales, Jordan Sanchez, and Sergio Cabello—are either in the U.S. illegally or have overstayed their visas.

While none of them have been charged with burglary at this time, they face multiple felonies, including possession of criminal tools and participation in a criminal gang.

This is no isolated incident. Reports have highlighted how international theft rings take advantage of weak border enforcement and exploit America’s generosity to fund their criminal operations.

These four suspects are scheduled to appear in court today, where justice will hopefully be swift and firm.

Burrow, beloved by fans for leading the Cincinnati Bengals on and off the field, spoke briefly after the break-in. On December 11, he told reporters that he felt “violated” by the crime.

Olivia Ponton, a Sports Illustrated Swimsuit model and friend of Burrow’s, reported the break-in to police but has declined to comment further.

This case serves as a wake-up call to secure our borders and protect American communities from international criminals. Americans deserve leaders who will prioritize law enforcement and prevent incidents like these from becoming the norm.

Read More at LifeZette

Uncategorized

The View’s Ana Navarro Calls Snoop Dogg a “Trained Seal” for Supporting Trump 

/

Ana Navarro, a co-host on The View, stirred controversy during a recent episode by criticizing black entertainers such as Snoop Dogg and Nelly for their participation in events associated with Donald Trump’s inauguration.

Navarro’s remarks, which included a comparison of Snoop Dogg to a “trained seal,” sparked backlash for their racially charged tone. The discussion unfolded as the panel addressed the involvement of several black performers in Trump’s inaugural festivities.

Co-host Sunny Hostin initiated the segment by highlighting criticism from CNN commentator Keith Boykin, who previously stated, “You dishonor [black] people when you go and perform for this man; this man who has done nothing but dishonor black people.”

Navarro expanded on the criticism, targeting entertainers who had opposed Trump in the past but later performed at his events.

“If you opposed and stood up against Trump in 2017, but you were there now, if you spoke up against Trump on January 7th, 2021, but you were there now applauding him like a trained seal, Donald Trump has not changed. You’ve changed,” she said.

Her comments referenced Snoop Dogg’s outspoken opposition to Trump during the 2017 inaugural period.

Navarro’s remarks drew attention not only for their content but also for the racial undertones of her comparison, with some questioning whether her language crossed a line.

Navarro’s remarks are part of broader criticism that has been directed at The View, which airs under the ABC News division.

Critics argue that the show often veers into politically divisive territory, with a tone that can alienate viewers.

The latest controversy raises questions about the program’s approach to political commentary and its potential impact on the network’s reputation.

The segment reflected ongoing tensions within the entertainment industry regarding political affiliations.

Performers who engage with conservative events or figures frequently face backlash, particularly when their actions are perceived as contradictory to past statements.

The discussion highlights a persistent divide in how entertainers’ political decisions are perceived and judged, particularly along racial and ideological lines.

For many conservatives, the criticism from Navarro and Hostin serves as another example of the double standards applied by prominent media figures.

As The View continues to generate headlines with its outspoken commentary, the network must navigate balancing provocative discussions with maintaining journalistic integrity under the ABC News umbrella.

Whether the controversy surrounding Navarro’s comments will have lasting repercussions remains to be seen.

Read More at LifeZette

Uncategorized

Hakeem Jeffries Faces Scrutiny on Cover-Up of Biden’s Cognitive Issues

/

As Joe Biden prepares to leave office on Monday, allegations of a years-long effort to obscure his cognitive decline have resurfaced, raising questions about the role of Democratic leaders and the media in shaping public perception.

Among those facing criticism is House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), who appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press on Sunday and was pressed about his past statements supporting Biden’s re-election bid.

During the interview, host Kristen Welker confronted Jeffries with a clip from February 2024 in which he described Biden as “definitely the strongest candidate to defeat Donald Trump.”

Welker then asked directly, “What do you say to Americans who believe you and other top Democrats misled them?”

Jeffries responded by emphasizing Biden’s role as the incumbent at the time, stating, “Well, Joe Biden was the incumbent president at the time. He was the candidate at the time. And I supported him at the time. And that was the right thing to do based on the incumbent president making the decision that he was going to run. Obviously things changed in late June and early July.”

He added, “But I think what’s most important at this moment is not for us to look backwards, but to look forward, solve problems for hard-working American taxpayers, and get things done. That’s what the American people want to happen.”

Welker pushed further, asking whether Jeffries and other Democrats had a responsibility to be more transparent about Biden’s condition.

Jeffries avoided addressing the question directly, instead pivoting to Biden’s accomplishments.

“What I saw behind closed doors was a president who was working hard to get things done to deliver for the American people on infrastructure, on driving down the high price of life-saving prescription drugs, on bringing domestic manufacturing jobs back home to the United States of America,” Jeffries said.

He continued, “It’s important to understand that President Biden inherited three different catastrophes on Day One: a democracy catastrophe, a public health catastrophe, and an economic catastrophe, all at the same time, and worked hard to put America in the strongest possible position moving forward.”

Critics argue that Democratic leaders and media outlets played an active role in downplaying or dismissing concerns about Biden’s cognitive abilities, prioritizing political interests over transparency.

The issue has been described by some as one of the most significant political scandals in recent history.

Over the years, multiple instances of Biden’s public gaffes and misstatements fueled speculation about his mental fitness.

Despite this, media outlets largely avoided in-depth coverage, and Democratic leaders repeatedly dismissed concerns as unfounded.

As Biden’s tenure comes to an end, some lawmakers and political analysts believe the lack of transparency has damaged public trust.

The perception of a coordinated effort to shield the president’s vulnerabilities has left many questioning the credibility of those involved.

With Biden stepping down and Trump set to take office again, the fallout from this controversy could have long-term implications for the Democratic Party and its relationship with the media.

For many Americans, the scandal has reinforced skepticism about the motives of political and media elites.

While Jeffries emphasized moving forward during his interview, calls for accountability and transparency continue to grow.

Read More at LifeZette

Big Government, Uncategorized

Kristi Noem Schools Senator Andy Kim on Border Security, Leaves Him Red-Faced

/

South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, nominated by President Trump as Homeland Security Secretary, faced the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Friday morning for her confirmation hearing.

As reported by The Gateway Pundit, what unfolded was not only a testament to her poise and knowledge but also an embarrassing display of unpreparedness from Senator Andy Kim (D-N.J.).

Noem, who has served as governor since 2019 and previously represented South Dakota in the U.S. House of Representatives, handled the hearing with professionalism. However, Senator Kim’s questioning revealed a shocking lack of understanding about border security and constitutional authority.

Kim began by citing the appointment of Tom Homan as President Trump’s Border Czar and asked Noem, “Who’s in charge of the nation’s borders?”

A question so elementary it hardly required a response. Without hesitation, Noem clarified that under the U.S. Constitution, the President holds ultimate authority over national security, including border management.

Kim sheepishly admitted that her response aligned with what he expected but claimed he was “confused” because of Homan’s role.

Noem patiently explained that while Homan has been tasked with overseeing enforcement, she, Homan, and other officials work under the President’s directives.

Her clear, concise response underscored Kim’s lack of preparation. The moment was a stark reminder of the gaps in understanding among some Democratic lawmakers regarding basic governmental functions.

The exchange didn’t end there. Kim launched into a lengthy monologue expressing concern that Homan’s role might overshadow Noem’s responsibilities. Remaining composed, Noem reassured him that she had no issues collaborating with Homan under President Trump’s leadership.

Her response once again highlighted her competence and understanding of the role, leaving Kim visibly flustered.

For New Jerseyans, this display from Senator Kim might give pause. If this level of confusion and lack of preparation is what they can expect over the next six years, the Garden State may be in for a rough ride.

Read More at LifeZette

Congress

Nancy Mace to Crockett: “Want to Take It Outside?” After Heated Insult

/

A heated confrontation unfolded between Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) and Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) during a House Oversight Committee meeting on Tuesday.

The clash, centered on civil rights and issues related to transgender policies, quickly escalated into a verbal sparring match that garnered significant attention both in and outside Congress.

The disagreement began when Crockett mocked Mace’s efforts to address concerns about biological men in women’s restrooms and sports.

“I can see that somebody’s [Mace’s] campaign coffers really are struggling right now,” Crockett quipped. “So she’s gonna keep saying trans, trans, trans, so that people will feel threatened.”

Crockett’s remarks were accompanied by a dismissive tone, as she added, “And child, listen.”

The comment sparked an immediate and fiery response from Mace. “I am no child! Do not call me a child!” Mace exclaimed. “I am no child. Don’t even start. I am a grown woman. I am 47 years old.”

The South Carolina congresswoman continued to rebuff Crockett’s remarks, adding, “You will not do that. I am not a child. If you want to take it outside, we can do that.”

The tense exchange prompted Rep. Maxwell Alejandro Frost (D-FL) to request that Mace’s comments be stricken from the record.

However, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) dismissed the request, characterizing the remark as a suggestion to settle the discussion over “a cup of coffee, or maybe a beer” outside the halls of Congress.

Watch the video:

The confrontation did not end in the committee room.

Both Mace and Crockett took to X (formerly Twitter) to continue their war of words.

Crockett accused Mace of having “threatened to physically fight me,” while Mace countered with the retort, “If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.”

During the hearing, Crockett also dismissed concerns about biological men in women’s locker rooms as a “fantasy” and accused her Republican colleague of wanting “to be dramatic.”

Mace, a survivor of sexual assault, expressed strong disapproval of Crockett’s comments, calling them dismissive of legitimate concerns.

This is not the first time Mace has been involved in contentious interactions.

Last month, Capitol Police arrested a transgender rights advocate who physically assaulted her.

Mace, who sustained minor injuries requiring medical attention, was vocal in her response, stating, “Your tr*ns violence and threats on my life will only make me double down. FAFO.”

The suspect, 33-year-old James McIntyre of Illinois, was charged with assaulting a government official.

Crockett, meanwhile, has gained a reputation for provocative comments.

At a House Oversight Committee hearing earlier this month, she accused Republicans of using minorities to secure congressional seats for white lawmakers.

In a separate instance, she went viral for a racially charged tirade about “the white man.”

Additionally, Crockett faced criticism during a hearing about border issues when she attempted to demean Donald Trump’s incoming border czar, Tom Homan. Homan responded bluntly, saying, “I don’t know who this lady is. Apparently, she’s not real smart.”

The fiery exchanges between Mace and Crockett highlight the growing tensions in Congress over contentious social and political issues.

With both lawmakers unyielding in their positions, this incident serves as a stark example of the increasingly polarized environment in Washington.

Read More at LifeZette

Big Government

Resurfaced Clip Confirms Trump’s Warning About Newsom and Wildfires

/

Los Angeles County is grappling with devastating wildfires that have displaced tens of thousands of residents and left vast swathes of land in ashes.

As the blazes rage out of control, a video of former President Donald Trump criticizing California’s fire management policies has resurfaced, drawing renewed attention to his remarks.

The clip, from Trump’s appearance on the Joe Rogan podcast three months ago, highlights his sharp critique of California’s environmental regulations and forest maintenance strategies.

Trump’s podcast discussion focused on what he sees as California’s failure to address critical issues like water management and forest upkeep. “They said, ‘We have no water,’” Trump stated in the interview.

“I said, do you have a drought? ‘No, we don’t have a drought.’ I said, why do you have no water? ‘Because the water isn’t allowed to flow down.’ It’s got a natural flow from Canada all the way up north, more water than they could ever use. And in order to protect a tiny little fish, the water up north gets routed into the Pacific Ocean. Millions and millions of gallons of water gets poured.”

The “tiny little fish” referenced by Trump is the delta smelt, a species native to California waterways and a central figure in the state’s environmental regulations.

Trump criticized these policies, arguing that they prioritize the fish over the safety and welfare of California residents. “I could have water for all of that land, water for your forests,” he said. “You know your forests are dry as a bone.”

He further suggested that simple measures like clearing deadfall and raking leaves could significantly reduce wildfire damage.

Trump’s long-standing criticism of California’s fire management policies also includes comments on forest maintenance.

“They’re not allowed to rake their forests because you’re not allowed to touch it,” he said during the podcast. “And all they have to do is clean their forest, meaning rake it up, get rid of the leaves, you know, leaves that are sitting there for five years.”

Currently, three major wildfires in Los Angeles County—affecting areas such as Pacific Palisades, Sylmar, and Pasadena—have forced the evacuation of over 30,000 residents and left 200,000 without power. Fire officials report zero percent containment, with the powerful Santa Ana winds continuing to fuel the flames.

Governor Gavin Newsom has declared a state of emergency, warning that conditions could worsen in the coming days.

Trump doubled down on his criticism of California’s policies on Truth Social, specifically targeting Governor Newsom. “Governor Gavin Newscum refused to sign the water restoration declaration put before him that would have allowed millions of gallons of water, from excess rain and snow melt from the North, to flow daily into many parts of California, including the areas that are currently burning in a virtually apocalyptic way,” Trump wrote. He accused Newsom of prioritizing the delta smelt over Californians’ safety, stating, “He wanted to protect an essentially worthless fish called a smelt… but didn’t care about the people of California. Now the ultimate price is being paid.”

While experts acknowledge that California’s wildfire challenges are multifaceted, including factors like climate change and urban sprawl, Trump’s remarks have gained traction as residents grapple with the fallout of the current crisis.

Firefighters continue to struggle against the infernos, which are exacerbated by the state’s prolonged water shortages and years of forest mismanagement.

The wildfires in Los Angeles County underscore the dire need for systemic change in California’s environmental and resource management strategies.

Trump’s critique, though polarizing, raises questions about whether longstanding policies have contributed to the recurring devastation faced by Californians each wildfire season.

As the flames continue to spread, so too does the debate over the state’s preparedness and priorities.

Read More at LifeZette

Big Government

Adam Schiff Can’t Wait to Launch Another Trump Impeachment Push

/

Donald Trump is set to become the 47th president of the United States on January 20, 2025, following his victory in both the Electoral College and the popular vote.

While his return to the White House marks a significant political shift, it also sets the stage for potential renewed battles with his opponents, particularly from the Democratic Party.

For Republicans, retaking the Senate was critical for advancing Trump’s agenda and creating a legislative firewall against Democratic opposition.

The GOP’s success in securing Senate control offers a smoother path for Trump’s policies to gain traction, while also providing a defense against potential impeachment efforts. In a worst-case scenario where Kamala Harris had won the presidency, a Republican-controlled Senate would have been essential to prevent what conservatives often describe as “left-wing lunacy.”

With Trump’s victory, however, Republicans see an opportunity to push forward his policy agenda without the gridlock experienced during his first term.

Even before Trump’s inauguration, Democrats have made it clear they will closely scrutinize his administration’s actions. Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA), who played a prominent role in Trump’s first impeachment trial, signaled his party’s readiness to challenge Trump again if necessary. “If he abuses his office, we will vigorously push back, fight back, stand up to him as we had to do during his first term in office,” Schiff stated.

For Democrats, the definition of “abusing his office” has often been a point of contention.

Critics argue that opposition to Trump during his first term frequently revolved around ordinary executive actions that were portrayed as extralegal offenses.

With Trump returning to the presidency, similar conflicts are anticipated. Unlike his first term, Trump enters office with a clearer mandate. His dual victories in the Electoral College and the popular vote represent a significant accomplishment and demonstrate widespread support across the country. This could strengthen his position as he seeks to implement his agenda.

Over the years, efforts to undermine Trump through legal challenges and investigations—often referred to by his supporters as “lawfare”—have largely failed to derail his political momentum.

The culmination of these efforts reached a point where even some liberals expressed frustration with Attorney General Merrick Garland, reflecting dissatisfaction within Democratic ranks.

As Trump prepares to take office, the nation faces ongoing political fatigue. The divisive rhetoric and partisan battles that defined much of his first term have left many Americans weary of anti-Trump controversies. Whether his second term will see a continuation of these dynamics or a shift toward governance remains to be seen. For now, Trump and his supporters view his return to the presidency as a validation of his leadership and a rejection of the tactics employed by his opponents.

Democrats, however, are expected to remain vigilant and ready to challenge his administration at every turn.

Read More at LifeZette

Border

Trump’s Border Czar Reveals Controversial Plans Likely to Fuel Weekly Media Backlash

/

Tom Homan, tapped by President-elect Donald Trump to serve as his border czar, has announced plans to take a tough and transparent approach to immigration enforcement.

Speaking at a fundraiser in Naples, Florida, on Sunday evening, Homan detailed his strategy for tackling illegal immigration, including weekly White House briefings to update the public on arrests and deportations.

Homan, a former acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), will assume his new role when Trump is inaugurated on January 20.

He emphasized his commitment to enforcing immigration laws “without apology” and keeping voters informed about the administration’s progress. “There needs to be a weekly White House press briefing on exactly who we’re arresting and who we’re saving, who we are putting in jail, who we are deporting, so the American people know we’re true to our word,” Homan stated.

He stressed the importance of transparency and indicated that his background as a Fox News commentator made him well-suited for the task.

Homan also pledged to end the controversial “catch-and-release” policy, under which asylum seekers are released pending court appearances due to insufficient detention capacity. “It will be sad. It will be controversial. It will be emotional,” Homan acknowledged, anticipating media backlash.

Homan outlined three priorities given to him by Trump: securing the southern border, launching a large-scale deportation program, and locating 300,000 undocumented children who have gone missing within the United States.

Addressing logistical challenges, Homan noted that scaling up deportation operations would require additional resources. “We have limited facilities, but we’re gonna do everything we can with what we have,” he said.

He called on Congress to act quickly on funding, suggesting that $86 billion would be a strong starting point to cover the costs of beds and operations.

Homan explained the complexities involved in deportation, particularly for individuals from countries reluctant to accept their nationals. “Say someone is illegal. Let’s say he’s a criminal. He’s convicted of murder, originally from El Salvador,” he said. “I can’t put him on an airplane on day one. You gotta detain him long enough to get travel documents, get landing rights. El Salvador has to admit that it’s their national. That takes a few days to a few weeks. So I need beds.”

Homan revealed that discussions are already underway to find alternative destinations for migrants from countries unwilling to repatriate them.

While declining to name specific countries, he confirmed that negotiations had begun ahead of Trump’s inauguration.

Reports have previously mentioned Turks and Caicos, Panama, and Grenada as potential destinations, though some nations, including the Bahamas, have ruled out such agreements.

Guatemala has expressed tentative openness to housing deportees, according to Reuters.

Homan noted that this approach mirrors efforts in other nations, such as the United Kingdom’s deal with Rwanda to house refugees.

However, such plans often face legal challenges, as demonstrated by the American Civil Liberties Union’s opposition to a similar Trump-era proposal in 2019.

Homan pointed to the November elections as evidence that voters support stricter immigration enforcement.

A recent J.L. Partners poll for DailyMail.com found that the border crisis ranked as the second most important issue for voters, trailing only inflation.

As Homan prepares to take on his new role, he remains focused on implementing what Trump has called the “largest deportation in history.”

With Congress now under pressure to allocate resources for these initiatives, the success of the plan may hinge on swift legislative action. “This is what the American people want,” Homan said. “Give us the money we need, and we’ll get it done.”

Read More at LifeZette

Cancel Culture

Nikki Glaser Skewers Hollywood Elites at Golden Globes

/

Comedian Nikki Glaser took the stage at the Golden Globes on Sunday night, delivering a sharp monologue that skewered Hollywood’s elite, high-profile scandals, and even political endorsements.

The event took place at the Beverly Hilton in Beverly Hills, where Glaser’s opening remarks set the tone for a night of humor mixed with pointed commentary.

Glaser began by addressing the star-studded audience with a playful jab at their influence, particularly in politics. “I am not here to roast you tonight,” she said. “How could I, really? You’re all so famous, so talented, so powerful. I mean, you could really do anything … I mean, except tell the country who to vote for.”

The comment appeared to reference Hollywood celebrities who publicly supported Kamala Harris and other political figures.

Glaser’s quip drew laughter from the crowd while highlighting the often-debated impact of celebrity endorsements on public opinion.

In a more controversial moment, Glaser took aim at Sean “Diddy” Combs, referencing his ongoing sexual trafficking scandal. While discussing the film Challengers, she remarked, “That movie was more sexually charged than ‘. I’m upset too. The after-party’s not going to be as good this year. But we have to move on! Stanley Tucci’s freak-off just doesn’t have the same ring to it.”

The joke elicited mixed reactions, underscoring the tension surrounding the high-profile allegations against Combs.

Glaser didn’t spare NBC’s streaming platform, Peacock, from her comedic critique.

Highlighting the challenges streaming services face in gaining visibility, she joked about Eddie Redmayne’s nomination for his role in The Day of the Jackal.

“It’s about a top-secret elite sniper that no one can find, because he’s on Peacock,” Glaser quipped, earning laughs from the audience and pointing to the platform’s struggles to stand out in the crowded streaming market.

The comedian also turned her attention to Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson’s business ventures.

Ahead of introducing Johnson as a presenter, Glaser poked fun at celebrities using their fame to launch products, particularly tequila brands.

“Remember: the point of being nominated isn’t to win an award. No, the point of being nominated is to make a tequila brand so popular that you never have to make art again,” she said.

Johnson, known for his Teremana tequila brand, took the joke in stride as he took the stage shortly after.

Glaser’s monologue at the Golden Globes blended humor with social commentary, touching on Hollywood’s influence, scandals, and commercial endeavors.

Her sharp remarks set the stage for a night that celebrated the best in television and film while reflecting the challenges and controversies surrounding the entertainment industry.

The Golden Globes, one of Hollywood’s most anticipated annual events, continues to serve as a platform for both celebration and satire, with comedians like Glaser delivering humor that resonates well beyond the awards show stage.

Read More at LifeZette

Economics, Uncategorized

Biden’s Last Act: Cementing Offshore Drilling Ban Before Trump Takes Over

/

As President Joe Biden prepares to exit the Oval Office, his administration is reportedly gearing up to deliver a final parting gift to environmental activists—one that could deal a lasting blow to American energy independence.

According to Bloomberg News, Biden plans to impose restrictions on offshore oil and gas drilling, potentially handcuffing President-elect Donald Trump’s efforts to reinvigorate the U.S. energy sector, as reported by The Daily Caller.

Bloomberg’s sources indicate Biden’s executive order would permanently ban new lease sales for oil and gas drilling across certain areas of the outer continental shelf. While specific regions remain unconfirmed, whispers suggest coastal California and parts of the Gulf of Mexico may be targeted.

If enacted, the move would align with the demands of deep-pocketed environmental groups and progressive lawmakers eager to cement Biden’s legacy as a climate warrior.

This maneuver, however, directly counters Trump’s pledge to “unleash American energy dominance.” Biden’s potential restrictions could make it exceedingly difficult for the next administration to roll back, thanks to legal provisions allowing presidents to protect federal waters without granting clear authority to reverse such designations.

In typical fashion, the Biden administration is attempting to tie Trump’s hands, prioritizing its ideological agenda over the practical needs of hardworking Americans.

Beyond offshore drilling, Biden’s lame-duck administration has been sprinting to finalize an array of green policies. Just last year, it issued the most restrictive five-year offshore leasing schedule in U.S. history, further throttling domestic energy development.

Recent actions include blocking oil and gas development in Nevada’s Ruby Mountains for the next 20 years and doling out massive taxpayer-funded loans to green energy firms—moves that seem more focused on appeasing the environmentalist elite than addressing the nation’s economic realities.

These late-term policies are a continuation of the administration’s broader climate crusade, which has hampered America’s energy independence and economic resilience. For average Americans, the consequences are clear: higher energy costs, increased dependence on foreign oil, and diminished economic opportunities in energy-rich regions of the country.

While the White House declined to comment on these developments, the timing of this move raises eyebrows. With just days left in office, Biden’s push to enshrine radical environmental policies smacks of a desperate attempt to solidify his legacy—even if it means leaving everyday Americans to pay the price.

Read More at LifeZette


Subscribe Form

© 2025 WokeSpy All Rights Reserved

Scroll to Top