Author name: LifeZette

Cancel Culture

Amazon Prime Slammed for Editing Iconic Scene in “It’s a Wonderful Life”

/

Amazon Prime Studios is under fire this Christmas for presenting an abridged version of the 1946 classic Christmas film It’s a Wonderful Life that omits a critical scene pivotal to the story’s character development.

Fans and critics alike have expressed outrage, accusing the streaming service of diminishing the film’s emotional impact and narrative coherence.

The original It’s a Wonderful Life, directed by Frank Capra, tells the story of George Bailey (played by Jimmy Stewart), a well-loved citizen of Bedford Falls.

Facing financial ruin after his uncle misplaces a bank deposit, George is driven to despair. He contemplates suicide but is saved by Clarence Odbody (Henry Travers), a guardian angel.

Clarence reveals what life in Bedford Falls would have been like had George never existed, ultimately inspiring George to embrace his life, despite its challenges.

The controversy centers around the so-called “Pottersville scene.” In this segment, George tells Clarence that he feels his life insurance policy makes him worth more dead than alive.

Clarence responds by showing George a stark, alternate reality in which he was never born—a world where lives and events are profoundly worse without him.

This revelation marks a turning point in the film, as George realizes his life has had immense value to those he loves.

Filled with renewed purpose, he rushes back to Bedford Falls, joyous and ready to face his troubles.

However, in Amazon Prime’s abridged version of the film, this transformative scene is cut entirely.

The film jumps from Clarence stating he must earn his wings to George running through the streets of Bedford Falls in happiness, leaving viewers without the crucial explanation of his emotional turnaround.

Fans have criticized the edit, saying it removes the heart of the story and renders the climax nonsensical.

The Daily Mail reported on the uproar, with many fans accusing Amazon Prime of censoring the movie for “woke” reasons.

However, Amazon has clarified that the full, unabridged version of It’s a Wonderful Life is available on its platform in both black-and-white and colorized formats.

The abridged version, according to Amazon, exists for two reasons: concerns that the suicide scene is “too dark” for some viewers and unresolved copyright disputes related to the omitted segment.

The copyright issues trace back to claims that the removed scene was based on the short story The Greatest Gift by Philip Van Doren Stern.

Allegedly, director Frank Capra used the story without properly crediting the author. Additionally, some background music in the film has faced separate copyright claims, further complicating its public domain status.

Media company RiffTrax, which has also streamed the abridged version, cited these same copyright concerns.

While the film is generally considered public domain, these lingering disputes over specific elements have led to variations in how the movie is presented.

Although Amazon Prime may not be directly responsible for the abridged version’s existence, the omission of such a critical scene has left fans deeply dissatisfied.

Many have called for greater transparency about the differences between versions and questioned why such an iconic film would be edited in the first place.

The controversy highlights ongoing challenges with preserving classic films in the streaming era, particularly when legal issues and modern sensitivities collide with artistic integrity.

For now, fans of It’s a Wonderful Life can still access the full version of the beloved holiday classic, but the debate over its abridged counterpart continues to spark outrage this Christmas season.

Read More at LifeZette

Cancel Culture, Uncategorized

Elon Musk Slams “Wokepedia” for Blowing $50M on DEI Agenda

/

Tech entrepreneur Elon Musk has called on his followers to stop donating to the Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit organization behind Wikipedia, citing concerns over the organization’s significant budget allocation to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.

“Stop donating to Wokepedia until they restore balance to their editing authority,” Musk wrote Tuesday on X, the social media platform where he has nearly 210 million followers.

Musk’s comment came in response to a post by the right-leaning commentator “Libs of TikTok,” who highlighted a pie chart showing that 29% of Wikipedia’s $177 million 2023-24 budget is allocated to “equity” and “safety & inclusion.”

According to Wikimedia Foundation’s publicly available financial documents, $51.7 million has been set aside for these purposes.

Specifically, 17.6% of the budget ($31.2 million) is directed toward equity initiatives, while 11.6% ($20.5 million) is dedicated to safety and inclusion.

The largest share of the budget—48.7% ($86.1 million)—is allocated to infrastructure, followed by 22.2% ($39.2 million) for effectiveness measures.

The foundation stated, “Supporting equity represents the second largest part of our programmatic work, with grants and Movement support representing the majority of the budget within the equity goal.”

DEI initiatives, aimed at fostering diversity and inclusion in workplaces, have faced criticism from conservatives, who argue that such policies can lead to reverse discrimination and a shift away from merit-based systems.

The debate over DEI has intensified since corporate America widely adopted these practices following the 2020 death of George Floyd.

However, recent months have seen a reversal of these policies in some companies under pressure from public campaigns led by right-leaning figures like Robby Starbuck.

Notable corporations such as Walmart, Ford Motor Company, Molson Coors, and Jack Daniel’s parent company Brown-Forman have scaled back DEI initiatives.

Wikipedia, which receives approximately 4 billion monthly visits, asserts that it operates with political neutrality.

However, studies and reports have repeatedly pointed out the platform’s left-leaning bias.

Earlier this year, the online encyclopedia came under scrutiny when it removed a reference to Kamala Harris as a “border czar” in one of its entries.

This occurred after Joe Biden endorsed Harris to run against Donald Trump, despite Biden’s earlier assignment of border policy oversight to her during his administration.

A June report from the Manhattan Institute, a libertarian think tank, found that Wikipedia articles tend to portray right-leaning public figures with more negative sentiment, such as anger and disgust, compared to the positive emotions like joy more frequently associated with left-leaning figures.

Similarly, a 2012 study published in the American Economic Review analyzed 28,000 Wikipedia articles on U.S. politics and concluded that the entries leaned Democrat on average.

Larry Sanger, who co-founded Wikipedia with Jimmy Wales in 2001, has also raised concerns about the platform’s political bias.

In a 2021 interview with Unherd.com, Sanger claimed that Democratic-leaning volunteers actively remove content that conflicts with their views, citing the Hunter Biden laptop controversy as an example. “Can you trust it to always give you the truth? Well, it depends on what you think the truth is,” Sanger said.

Sanger and Wales have clashed over the years regarding their respective roles in founding the platform.

Sanger maintains that he co-founded Wikipedia, while Wales describes Sanger as a subordinate employee.

Wales has faced criticism for allegedly editing his own Wikipedia entry to downplay Sanger’s contributions.

As debates over Wikipedia’s neutrality and spending practices continue, Musk’s comments have amplified conservative criticism of the platform’s governance and priorities.

Read More on LifeZette

Uncategorized

CNN’s Jennings Roasts Dems’ Musk Critique: “Soros Collects Politicians Like Pokémon”

/

CNN’s Scott Jennings criticized Democrats on Sunday for their opposition to Elon Musk, calling it “hypocritical” in light of the influence wielded by left-wing billionaire George Soros.

Jennings made his remarks during an appearance on State of the Union with CNN host Dana Bash.

The discussion came as Democrats escalated their criticisms of Musk following his opposition to Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson’s original 1,574-page continuing resolution (CR).

The resolution, which included provisions that could cost hundreds of billions of dollars, faced backlash from Musk, who urged voters to oppose lawmakers supporting the measure.

Bash asked Jennings whether Musk’s growing influence might “wear thin” on President-elect Donald Trump.

“I don’t think so. I mean look, they appear to be getting along well,” Jennings responded.

“Musk was very instrumental in his victory, and I hear Democrats criticizing the idea that we have unelected people with too much influence over the government. I invite them to pick up the Wall Street Journal from this week and find out that unelected people have been running the government for the last four years.”

Jennings did not hold back on what he viewed as Democratic hypocrisy. “I hear Democrats criticizing the influence of billionaires on our politics when you’ve got this Soros punk running around collecting Democrat politicians like my kids collect Pokémon cards,” he said.

“So I think all the criticism of Musk coming from the left is totally hypocritical, totally over-the-top, and he is doing something interesting, bringing some transparency to the federal government. It’s not a terrible thing.”

Soros, through Soros Fund Management, has long been a major donor to Democratic politicians, organizations, and progressive causes.

Over 20 district attorneys in cities such as New York and Los Angeles have reportedly received campaign funding from Soros-backed groups.

Former Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascon, a notable recipient of Soros funding, was voted out in November after pursuing far-left policies that critics say weakened law enforcement and hurt small businesses.

In 2023, Soros Fund Management donated $173,710 to Democratic congressional candidates, $183,010 to federal candidates overall, and $850,000 to the Texas Organizing Project (TOP), according to OpenSecrets. TOP advocates for ending “mass incarceration,” reforming immigration policies, and creating a path to citizenship for 11 million undocumented immigrants.

Beyond politics, Soros has extended his influence into media, with his investment firm acquiring over $400 million of debt from Audacy, the second-largest radio network in the U.S., as part of a restructuring agreement.

Read More at LifeZette

Woke

High School Athlete Suffers Life-Changing Injury in Volleyball Match With Transgender Opponent

/

Payton McNabb’s dreams of becoming a collegiate athlete were shattered in one devastating moment during a high school volleyball match.

On September 1, 2022, Payton’s team faced an opponent with a male player claiming to be female. A spike from this transgender competitor struck Payton in the head and neck, leaving her unconscious on the gym floor, as reported by The Western Journal.

Her mother, Pamela McNabb, shared the heartbreaking details in an opinion piece for Fox News.

“My daughter, Payton, was struck in the head and neck by a spike from a transgender-identifying male on the opposing team, causing her to lose consciousness and lay in a fencing position on the gym floor,” she wrote.

The injury led to life-altering consequences for the once-promising athlete. Payton was diagnosed with a traumatic brain injury, leaving her partially paralyzed on her right side. She struggles with vision, speech, and basic motor functions.

Before the injury, Payton was a standout athlete with aspirations to play softball in college. As her mother recounted, she battles daily to relearn basic tasks.

“Seemingly overnight, Payton began to struggle with everything. She suffered from debilitating head and neck pain, couldn’t drive, and had to be assisted in school as she worked to relearn basic cognitive processes.”

Pamela described the fear and frustration her daughter faces. “She had gone from excelling at everything she ever did to struggling to brush her own hair. All of her hopes and dreams, all of her hard work in the classroom and on sports teams, all of the sacrifices she made to chase her dream of playing softball past high school — all of it was gone.”

Despite her injuries, Payton fought to return to the softball field. However, the physical pain and limitations have made it impossible for her to perform at the same level.

Her mother detailed the challenges: “Her leg would tremble while she sat behind the plate as the team’s catcher, and I would sit behind her, watching as tears streamed down her face from the pain. She couldn’t steal bases anymore because her bad leg would fold up under her, and she could only slide with her gloves in her hands, so she had something to focus on.”

This tragedy highlights the dangers posed by allowing biological males to compete in women’s sports. Pamela warned other parents: “Do not let my family’s experience become your own. Pull your child from the game.”

Her call to action extends beyond parents. With 24 states still permitting males to compete against females in high school athletics, Pamela pleaded for lawmakers to protect young women.

“These policies endanger our girls’ safety and well-being.

“If these states refuse to step up and protect young women from experiencing the harms Payton has suffered, parents must step up in their place.”

Payton McNabb’s story is a sobering reminder of the real consequences of these policies. The injuries she suffered were preventable. It’s time to prioritize fairness and safety in women’s sports before more young women endure the same fate.

Read More at LifeZette

National Affairs, Uncategorized

Long Island Police Get Green Light to Take Down Drones 

/

Nassau County officials have authorized local law enforcement to shoot down drones deemed a threat to public safety.

The announcement came Thursday during the unveiling of a state-of-the-art drone command center capable of tracking drones from miles away.

However, officials acknowledged that they still require federal approval for more advanced tools to neutralize drones safely.

County Executive Bruce Blakeman emphasized the urgency of taking proactive measures to prevent potential disasters. “We don’t want to wait until we have some kind of disastrous event to then say, ‘Well, we could have done this and we could have done that,’” Blakeman said.

He granted the Nassau County Police Department the authority to take down drones posing a risk during mass gatherings. “If there is a mass gathering anywhere and there is a drone that is a threat to the public at large, they have the authority and the jurisdiction and the right to shoot down that drone,” Blakeman added.

Nassau County Police Commissioner Patrick Ryder highlighted the department’s preparedness to address the growing drone threat. “As far as my snipers go, I have 30 of the best, world-renowned snipers in the country that can hit a quarter a mile away,” Ryder said.

He also pointed to the county’s new command center, which allows authorities to monitor drone activity within a 20-mile radius.

Despite these advancements, Ryder acknowledged the limitations of local resources. “I can see a drone coming from 20 miles, but I can’t stop it,” he said. Ryder and Blakeman urged Congress to pass legislation enabling local authorities to use drone mitigation technology, such as signal jamming or forced returns to the drone’s home base.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recently issued a temporary ban on drone operations over parts of New Jersey and authorized the use of “deadly force” against drones violating restricted airspace.

The ban is in effect until at least January 17, prohibiting unmanned aircraft within a nautical mile of specified areas outlined in an FAA Notice to Airmen (NOTAM).

Increased drone sightings in recent months, particularly over New Jersey, New York, and near 17 U.S. military installations, have raised alarms.

Some of the sightings occurred near properties linked to foreign entities, including China, fueling national security concerns.

Republican Rep. Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey suggested a possible link to an Iranian “mothership” over the Atlantic Ocean.

He criticized the federal government’s response, calling it “not just frustrating — it’s dangerous.”

Blakeman called on the federal government to provide local jurisdictions with the tools and authority to address the drone threat effectively. “We would like the power to do a few things,” he said.

“Number one, we would like the technology so we don’t have to shoot it down, because that creates a whole ’nother set of problems with the people who are on the ground.”

Blakeman advocated for drone mitigation technology that could disable drones or send them back to their operators.

He also urged for legislation allowing local authorities to issue federal summonses for violations of drone laws.

The mysterious drone sightings have left residents and officials seeking answers.

The White House has largely downplayed the concerns, but local officials and lawmakers are pressing for action.

Nassau County’s new drone command center represents a significant step forward, but Blakeman and Ryder agree that without federal support, their ability to address the threat remains limited.

As Nassau County takes matters into its own hands, the push for stronger federal collaboration and technology to mitigate drones grows, reflecting the increasing urgency of addressing this evolving security challenge.

Read More at LifeZette

Big Cities, Big Government, Uncategorized

Scott Presler Outlines 2025 New Jersey Red Wave Strategy

/

Scott Presler, the founder of Early Vote Action, is ramping up voter registration efforts in New Jersey and Pennsylvania ahead of the 2025 election cycle.

Appearing on Fox News with Steve Doocy, Presler outlined his grassroots strategy to target key demographics and flip traditionally blue states to red.

Presler emphasized the close margins of past elections in New Jersey and Pennsylvania as an indicator of the potential for Republican gains. “Well, you know, at earlyvoteaction.com, we believe that victory begets victory. We just had a slam dunk for the Republican Party. We have a trifecta we delivered at the White House, Senate, and House,” Presler said. Highlighting the geographical and cultural proximity between the two states, he added, “For all intents and purposes, one-fourth of Pennsylvania’s border joins with New Jersey. There are a lot of shared values.”

Presler detailed his plans to engage voters in 2025, particularly in New Jersey’s shore town of Wildwood. “From the spring and summer all in 2025, we’re going to Wildwood. That’s where Philly goes to the beach. Let’s register voters and get both New Jersey and Pennsylvania,” he stated.

Fox News host Steve Doocy pointed to New Jersey’s 2021 gubernatorial race, where Democratic Governor Phil Murphy narrowly defeated Republican Jack Ciattarelli by just 3.2%. Doocy noted, “In this deep blue state, the Democrat almost lost, and it was the same year that Governor Youngkin down in Virginia was able to make some hay. New Jersey has really high taxes… Nobody really likes that.”

Presler drew a comparison between New Jersey and Pennsylvania, stating, “Look at the similarities: 2020 in Pennsylvania was decided by 80,000 votes. 2021 in New Jersey was decided by 84,000 votes. In PA, we went after truckers and hunters and Amish and veterans, and in New Jersey, we’re going to do the same thing.”

He elaborated on his approach, saying, “We’re going to the farmers markets and Veterans of Foreign Wars halls, and you’ll see us at the beach, courting the trucker vote. I want New Jersey folks to know that if every single Trump voter that came out in 2024 commits to voting on Tuesday, November 4, 2025, you have the power to flip that New Jersey governorship from blue to red.”

Doocy suggested that Donald Trump’s proposed policies could energize voters in New Jersey and nationwide.

“Donald Trump may actually help you out a lot,” Doocy remarked. “He’s made a lot of suggestions, things that he would like to get done… If people in New Jersey and across the country see him making hay, they’re going to go, you know what? Maybe that side, maybe the red side, is the side I should look at.”

Presler agreed, outlining Trump’s proposed agenda. “Look at what President Trump wants to do on day one. He wants to bring back the Keystone pipeline, and he wants to make sure that we’re cutting the corporate tax so jobs are coming back to America, not going overseas. He wants to make the economy better for working-class families. People are really struggling.”

Presler stressed the importance of voter turnout, warning against complacency. “The biggest obstacle that Republicans have, Steve, is complacency and apathy and not voting. Commit to vote on Tuesday, November 4, 2025, and we will win New Jersey,” he said.

Presler closed by encouraging Americans to embrace an “America First” agenda, noting, “If we are able to put forth this America First agenda, make life easier and more affordable for American families, and if people commit to voting, we could very well win the midterms. You will not only have two years of growth for our country, but President Trump will be able to use all four.”

Read More at LifeZette

Uncategorized

Don Lemon Can’t Contain Anger Over Trump Winning Person of the Year

/

Former CNN host Don Lemon voiced his disbelief on Thursday over Time Magazine naming President-elect Donald Trump as its 2024 “Person of the Year.”

This marks the second time Trump has received the title, with the first being in 2016 following his victory over Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

During a public discussion, Lemon expressed skepticism over the magazine’s decision, questioning whether the public might be “scammed” and challenging Trump’s eligibility for the recognition. “Now when you think about what encompasses ‘Person of the Year,’ just because you are elected President of the United States does not mean you should be ‘Person of the Year,’” Lemon said.

“Time Magazine, what are you doing? Let me ask you Time Magazine, what do you say to the women who I guess still read Time Magazine? … What about the women who are on that list? I’m sure some of them will have dealt with issues that women have to deal with, like discrimination in the workplace, [sexual assault], all kinds of things. You have someone on the cover of your magazine who is an adjudicated assaulter, you have someone who inspired an insurrection, you have someone who without a doubt, the evidence is there, tried to overturn a free and fair election. You had someone who had multiple criminal counts and found guilty on multiple criminal counts.”

Time Magazine highlighted Trump’s “unparalleled” political comeback in the face of legal and political challenges.

The article detailed Trump’s journey through a tumultuous period that included multiple criminal indictments and convictions, yet culminated in a decisive victory in the 2024 presidential election.

“Trump’s political rebirth is unparalleled in American history,” Eric Cortellessa of Time Magazine wrote.

“His first term ended in disgrace, with his attempts to overturn the 2020 election results culminating in the attack on the U.S. Capitol. He was shunned by most party officials when he announced his candidacy in late 2022 amid multiple criminal investigations. Little more than a year later, Trump cleared the Republican field, clinching one of the fastest contested presidential primaries in history. He spent six weeks during the general election in a New York City courtroom, the first former President to be convicted of a crime—a fact that did little to dampen his support.”

The magazine underscored Trump’s resilience in navigating high-profile legal cases while maintaining robust support among his base.

Trump faced several criminal indictments, including 34 felony counts brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, charges related to classified documents stored at Mar-a-Lago, and allegations of attempting to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia and Washington, D.C.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis charged Trump under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act.

Trump’s legal team filed a request on Dec. 4 to dismiss the Georgia charges, citing his upcoming presidential term.

Despite these legal hurdles, Trump became the first Republican nominee in 20 years to win the popular vote, flipping all seven battleground states and securing his path back to the White House.

The 2024 election saw Trump facing two Democratic opponents after Joe Biden exited the race on July 21, Kamala Harris stepped in as the Democratic nominee, raising nearly $1.5 billion and gaining momentum in the early stages of her campaign.

Ultimately, Trump’s victory solidified what Time Magazine called an extraordinary political comeback, making him a two-time recipient of its “Person of the Year” title.

Read More at LifeZette

Uncategorized

Barron Trump Mention in Viral UFC Chat Creates Social Media Storm 

/

A rare clip of Barron Trump speaking has taken the internet by storm, sparking a frenzy among supporters and casual observers alike.

The 17-year-old son of President-elect Donald Trump made a brief but memorable appearance in a scene from the documentary series Art of the Surge, chronicling Trump’s recent campaign, as reported by The New York Post.

In the video, filmed on election night, Barron is seen greeting UFC founder Dana White.

“Hello. How are you? It’s very nice to see you,” Barron says, shaking White’s hand with an air of formality. His deep voice, resonating with the cadence of his father, drew immediate comparisons online.

The quip elicited laughter from the room, but Barron, shaking his head, seemed to have no plans for stepping into the octagon.

Barron’s reserved demeanor and gentlemanly interactions struck a chord with supporters. “Barron is such a gentleman,” one commenter noted, echoing the sentiment across social media. The clip quickly went viral, with many users admitting it was their first time hearing Barron’s voice.

Read More at LifeZette

Celebrities

Hollywood Elitists Are In Absolute Nuclear Meltdown Over Trump’s Legal Victories

/

Hollywood celebrities are expressing outrage after special counsel Jack Smith moved to dismiss the remaining federal charges against President-elect Donald Trump, following his victory in the 2024 election.

A number of high-profile stars took to social media to voice their alarm over the dismissal, with some claiming that the rule of law in America is under threat.

The dismissal of charges against Trump marks a major legal win for the president-elect.

On Monday, Smith filed motions in both the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, effectively ending the federal government’s prosecution of Trump.

The motions sought to dismiss the remaining election interference case against Trump and an appeal in the documents case, leaving just two cases at the state level in Georgia and New York.

This victory has sent shockwaves through Hollywood, with many celebrities expressing their dismay.

Mark Hamill, best known for his role in Star Wars, was one of the first to speak out, declaring, “Justice in America, in fact, does NOT matter.” Hamill’s post echoed his concern that the legal system had failed in the case against Trump.

Wendell Pierce, an actor from The Wire, also took to social media, warning of the potential end of the rule of law.

“No one is above the law is mythology,” Pierce wrote, emphasizing his belief that Trump’s legal battles were far from over despite the recent developments.

Jon Cryer, star of Two and a Half Men, also expressed his dissatisfaction with the outcome, claiming, “The evidence against Donald Trump is overwhelming and unrefuted.”

His post pointed to what he perceived as the unaddressed criminality in Trump’s actions, including charges related to the January 6th Capitol attack and the documents case.

In a similar vein, Barbara Streisand, a veteran actress and singer, posted on social media, lamenting that Trump had avoided accountability for his actions. “Trump avoided any accountability for January 6th and the stolen documents and this is forever a stain on the concept that no one is above the law,” she wrote, adding her voice to the chorus of celebrities expressing disappointment.

The wave of responses from Hollywood stars came after news of the dismissal broke, as many had been vocal in supporting the legal battles against Trump.

This included a months-long campaign cheering on the prosecutions, with various figures calling for consequences following his presidency.

Further adding to the public backlash, George Takei, the Star Trek actor, posted a photo from the federal raid on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, making a pointed comment about the documents case. “Only biological males with cakey orange foundation and 34 felony convictions may use this bathroom,” Takei wrote, referencing the former president in his usual sarcastic style.

Actress Mia Farrow also weighed in, expressing her disappointment with the legal outcome. “What a gut punch. Never again can it be said that ‘In America, no one is above the law,’” she wrote, underscoring her frustration with the direction the legal system had taken.

Many point to the high-profile nature of the case and the perception that it was driven by political motives.

The celebrity reactions continue to highlight the divide in American politics, with many in Hollywood vocally denouncing Trump’s legal victories while others celebrate his return to power.

With the federal prosecutions now concluded, Trump faces legal challenges at the state level. However, the latest developments have left Hollywood figures reeling, with some fearing the implications for the justice system in the U.S.

As Trump prepares for his second term, the backlash from the entertainment industry is sure to continue, with high-profile figures making their views known on social media.

The ongoing legal battles may shape the political landscape as Trump’s return to the White House approaches.

Read More at LifeZette

Sports

Infamous Transgender Swimmer Lia Thomas Spreads Misinformation About Iowa’s “Trans-Ban”

/

Infamous transgender college swimmer Lia Thomas recently criticized Iowa’s law banning transgender athletes from participating in women’s sports, claiming it sends a message that trans kids “don’t deserve to participate.”

Thomas made these comments during a panel discussion at Iowa State University, hosted by the event “Trans Athletes and the Future of Sports.”

The law, which was signed into effect in 2022 by Iowa’s Republican Governor Kim Reynolds, has been a point of contention in the ongoing debate over transgender athletes in sports.

Thomas, who made headlines after joining the University of Pennsylvania’s women’s swim team after transitioning, faced significant scrutiny for competing in women’s events despite having been a male swimmer prior to his transition.

During the panel, Thomas expressed strong opposition to the law, falsely claiming it excludes transgender kids from sports participation.

“With the ban here in Iowa … the state is actively saying to trans kids, ‘You don’t deserve to participate. You are actually being excluded,’” Thomas stated.

However, the law does not prevent transgender children from participating in sports altogether.

It specifically prohibits males who identify as females from competing in girls’ sports.

Transgender athletes still have the right to participate in sports that correspond to their biological sex, and the law does not deny them access to these activities.

Thomas further emphasized the importance of sports in a child’s development, describing athletics as a vital part of his own education. “I had a team, a group I could identify with… it gave me that belonging,” Thomas said. “Athletics and, for me, the water was just … a place of peace where I could leave my worries outside.”

Keenan Crow, the Policy and Advocacy Director for One Iowa, echoed Thomas’s sentiments, similarly claiming that the law denies trans athletes the opportunity to participate in a crucial aspect of life that fosters resilience and community.

“Excluding trans athletes from sports denies them the chance to participate in a part of life that teaches resilience, teamwork, and community,” Crow said. “There’s value in just being on a team and being included, especially for young people who might be struggling to find acceptance.”

However, the discussion around transgender athletes in women’s sports has sparked significant backlash, particularly among female athletes who feel their rights and safety are being undermined.

One notable critic is former swimmer Paula Scanlan, who was on the University of Pennsylvania swim team alongside Thomas.

Scanlan shared her concerns about the impact of having male-born athletes in women’s sports spaces, particularly in locker rooms.

This is real. I know women who have lost roster spots and spots on the podium. I know of women with sexual trauma who are adversely impacted by having biological males in their locker room without their consent. I know this because I am one of these women,” Scanlan said.

Scanlan also revealed her personal experience as a survivor of sexual assault, highlighting how policies allowing transgender athletes in women’s spaces can negatively affect women, especially those who have experienced trauma.

“I was sexually assaulted on June 3rd of 2016. I was only 16 years old. I was able to forgive my attacker, but violence against women still exists. Let us not forget the viral #MeToo movement that empowered female victims to speak up. It casts a spotlight on the widespread prevalence of sexual assault and abuse, including in scholarly and educational institutions,” Scanlan added.

Resistance to the inclusion of transgender athletes in women’s sports continues to grow, with several high school and college teams taking action.

Recently, a girls’ volleyball team at a Christian school in Merced, California, forfeited a match rather than compete against a transgender athlete.

College teams have also taken a stand, with a lawsuit filed against San Jose State University and the Mountain West Conference for allowing a male player to join the women’s volleyball team.

Additionally, five colleges have refused to play against San Jose State due to its inclusion of transgender player Blair Fleming.

In the broader context, several groups are now suing the NCAA over its policy of permitting transgender athletes to compete in women’s sports, while the Olympic community is also facing internal debates over the issue.

A new candidate for president of the International Olympic Committee has promised to push for a ban on men competing in women’s events.

The ongoing debate surrounding transgender athletes in women’s sports continues to intensify as various groups, including athletes, schools, and governing bodies, weigh in on the complex issue.

Read More at LifeZette


Subscribe Form

© 2025 WokeSpy All Rights Reserved

Scroll to Top