Uncategorized

Uncategorized

Anna Paulina Luna Unveils Bill to Take Pedophiles “Off the Streets Permanently” With Death Penalty

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., has unveiled a new set of bills that aims to make society safer for children by giving child sexual predators the death penalty.

“If you are raping someone, if you’re molesting someone, you are essentially murdering their soul,” Luna said.

“Those people never actually fully recover. I’ve actually sat on a committee with a very prominent [female House Democrat] who actually talked about the fact that she was molested as a child.”

“And so you can see that it impacts and really hurts people,” Luna said.

Two of her three bills, would require sentences of death or at least life imprisonment for those charged with sexual crimes against children.

A third bill would require guilty verdicts of rape against adults to carry a mandatory minimum sentence of 30 years to life in prison.

Luna said he spoke to President-elect Donald Trump about the bills, who she suggested was enthusiastic about the idea.

“I got the impression that he absolutely is supportive of anything in this sector,” Luna said.

The Florida congresswoman met with Trump over the weekend at Mar-a-Lago along with other members of the House Freedom Caucus.

She said they also discussed Trump signing an executive order levying the death penalty for pedophilia.

“He would be willing to sign an [executive order]. But the fact is, is that it has to go through Congress first. So it would have to come to his desk that way,” she said.

Luna first introduced the bills in the last Congress, but failed to get traction.

She suggested that the death penalty aspect may have put some people off of an issue that otherwise could get wide bipartisan support.

However, she argued that pedophiles “cannot be rehabilitated.”

“If you are going to continue to push forward in a moral society, [then] you need to ensure that people like this, that are predators, are taken off the streets permanently,” Luna said.

Read More at the Daily Fetched

Economics, Uncategorized

Biden’s Last Act: Cementing Offshore Drilling Ban Before Trump Takes Over

As President Joe Biden prepares to exit the Oval Office, his administration is reportedly gearing up to deliver a final parting gift to environmental activists—one that could deal a lasting blow to American energy independence.

According to Bloomberg News, Biden plans to impose restrictions on offshore oil and gas drilling, potentially handcuffing President-elect Donald Trump’s efforts to reinvigorate the U.S. energy sector, as reported by The Daily Caller.

Bloomberg’s sources indicate Biden’s executive order would permanently ban new lease sales for oil and gas drilling across certain areas of the outer continental shelf. While specific regions remain unconfirmed, whispers suggest coastal California and parts of the Gulf of Mexico may be targeted.

If enacted, the move would align with the demands of deep-pocketed environmental groups and progressive lawmakers eager to cement Biden’s legacy as a climate warrior.

This maneuver, however, directly counters Trump’s pledge to “unleash American energy dominance.” Biden’s potential restrictions could make it exceedingly difficult for the next administration to roll back, thanks to legal provisions allowing presidents to protect federal waters without granting clear authority to reverse such designations.

In typical fashion, the Biden administration is attempting to tie Trump’s hands, prioritizing its ideological agenda over the practical needs of hardworking Americans.

Beyond offshore drilling, Biden’s lame-duck administration has been sprinting to finalize an array of green policies. Just last year, it issued the most restrictive five-year offshore leasing schedule in U.S. history, further throttling domestic energy development.

Recent actions include blocking oil and gas development in Nevada’s Ruby Mountains for the next 20 years and doling out massive taxpayer-funded loans to green energy firms—moves that seem more focused on appeasing the environmentalist elite than addressing the nation’s economic realities.

These late-term policies are a continuation of the administration’s broader climate crusade, which has hampered America’s energy independence and economic resilience. For average Americans, the consequences are clear: higher energy costs, increased dependence on foreign oil, and diminished economic opportunities in energy-rich regions of the country.

While the White House declined to comment on these developments, the timing of this move raises eyebrows. With just days left in office, Biden’s push to enshrine radical environmental policies smacks of a desperate attempt to solidify his legacy—even if it means leaving everyday Americans to pay the price.

Read More at LifeZette

Uncategorized

Amish to the Rescue: 12 Homes Built in Less Than 48 Hours For NC Hurricane Victims

In response to the growing housing crisis, a surprising group of volunteers has come to the aid of the community in western North Carolina: Amish families from Central Pennsylvania.

According to the High Country Press, members of this Amish community became aware of the devastation through a local resident who had visited the area.

Motivated to help, they contacted Andy Owens, who had established a base camp in the Meat Camp Area of Watauga County.

Owens helped coordinate the logistics, while the Amish community provided the manpower, materials, and funding.

On December 17, 62 men, women, and children from the Amish community traveled by bus, bringing with them five trailers filled with supplies, tools, and building equipment.

The Amish, who generally avoid modern technology, made an exception for this project, recognizing the critical need for housing in the region.

Upon their arrival around noon, they immediately began working. By 5 p.m. that same day, eight housing structures had been completed.

While the men and boys worked on construction, the women and girls focused on providing food and distributing pallets of toys and clothing to those in need.

Within less than two days, the group had constructed 12 fully built housing structures, which only required minor finishing touches, such as electrical work.

In addition to the homes, the Amish also donated 20 propane tanks, tools, and five pallets of supplies for local fire department rescue workers.

The total cost of the project was estimated at around $300,000, all of which was furnished by the Amish community.

Traveling hundreds of miles and working tirelessly for two days, these volunteers provided much-needed homes for people they will likely never meet.

This story serves as a reminder that acts of kindness and service can come from unexpected places.

The Amish, who are often the subject of jokes and misunderstandings due to their refusal to embrace modern conveniences, have proven that their dedication to their faith and community can make a tangible difference in the lives of others.

Their efforts in western North Carolina are a testament to the power of selfless action and the importance of helping those in need, no matter the distance or the challenges involved.

Read More at RVM News

Religion, Uncategorized

Hollywood Is Asking For Faith Films, Says “Homestead” Star Neal McDonough

Renowned actor Neal McDonough told Glenn Beck in Dec. that ‘something’s changed’ in Hollywood’s relationship with faith in 2024.

McDonough told Beck that when people like us here at Million Voices, or you wonderful folks at home, go out and buy movie tickets to see faith-based films, we’re sending a direct message to the movie studios in Los Angeles. “I love that,” said McDonough of this new trend in American culture. 

“I was reading [the breakdown] of all the studios, what they’re looking for, and this project and that,” McDonough continued. “And never ever, ever, have I seen before, of the 10 [studios] four or five of them at the bottom say, ‘oh, by the way, if you have something of faith, we’re very interested this year.’”

“Something’s changed,” McDonough continued. “Whether it’s Angel Studios or maybe it’s the amazing Erwin brothers, whether it’s Dallas Jenkins, or whether it’s the Kendricks, whomever it is that’s going out there on the limb and telling stories of faith so the whole family can go to a theater together, grab popcorn, grab a soda, hang-back and watch a movie for two hours, then after have a discussion with your eight-year-old, or your 80-year-old.”

Read More at Million Voices

Uncategorized

Trump Gave Permission to Elon Musk to Trash GOP Spending Bill on X

President-elect Donald Trump gave Elon Musk the green light to post multiple calls to kill the GOP-brokered spending deal.

“If the speaker acts decisively, and tough, and gets rid of all of the traps being set by the Democrats, which will economically and, in other ways, destroy our country, he will easily remain speaker,” Trump told Fox News Digital.

Trump suggested that Johnson’s proposed continuing resolution was was “unacceptable.”

“We’ll see. What they had yesterday was unacceptable,” Trump told NBC News.

“In many ways it was unacceptable. It’s a Democrat trap.”

ABC News reported that Trump also indicated that he had discussed his views on the bill with social media giant Musk and granted the billionaire permission to trash the government spending bill on his social media platform.

“I told him that if he agrees with me, that he could put out a statement,” Trump said.

Musk then conducted an all-out pressure campaign flooding his platform with dozens of posts threatening members of Congress to block Johnson’s government funding bill.

“Any member of the House or Senate who votes for this outrageous spending bill deserves to be voted out in 2 years!” Musk wrote.

Musk also called on his more than 200 million followers to call their representatives and urge them to block the bill.

“Please call your elected representatives right away to tell them how you feel! They are trying to get this passed today while no one is paying attention.”

Trump’s own statement opposing the measure came hours after Musk put his thoughts on his social media platform.

Trump, too, argued against the bill and threatened to primary Republicans who vote to pass it.

“If Republicans try to pass a clean Continuing Resolution without all of the Democrat “bells and whistles” that will be so destructive to our Country, all it will do, after January 20th, is bring the mess of the Debt Limit into the Trump Administration,” Trump said in a post on Wednesday.

“Any Republican that would be so stupid as to do this should, and will, be Primaried. Everything should be done, and fully negotiated, prior to my taking Office on January 20th, 2025.”

The next morning, Trump shared a similar sentiment with Fox News Digital, saying:

“Anybody that supports a bill that doesn’t take care of the Democrat quicksand known as the debt ceiling should be primaried and disposed of as quickly as possible.”

Read More at the Daily Fetched

Illegal Immigration, Immigration, Uncategorized

Gavin Newsom Planning to Help Illegal Migrants Escape Trump’s Deportation Efforts

California Gov. Gavin Newsom‘s administration is now scrambling to implement new plans to aid illegal migrants avoid deportation when President Donald Trump takes office next year.

According to an internal memo within the Newsom administration, the administration proposes the “creation of an Immigrant Support Network comprised of regional ‘hubs’ to connect at-risk individuals, their families, and communities with community systems—such as legal services, schools, labor unions, local governments, etc.”

That’s right, the Newsom is planning to defy the president of the United States and keep criminal illegal aliens in his state.

Watch

The New York Post reports:

A spokesperson for the governor’s office told The Post that the memo appears to be a “preliminary” document drafted at the “department-level” and that it has not been reviewed by Newsom.

“This document is an internal and deliberative draft document meant for internal discussions as part of a number of possible considerations given the incoming federal administration’s public remarks,” Scott Murray, a spokesperson for California’s Department of Social Services — the agency that drafted the memo — told The Post Tuesday.

“It is not a final proposal,” he added.

The Department of Social Services is still gauging interest in the proposed program, according to Politico, and determining when it could be implemented.

If the plan is finalized, it will be announced in mid-January, according to the outlet.

Meanwhile, Newsom convened a special session to secure $25 million to fund potential lawsuits against the incoming Trump administration.

The report follows Newsom convening a special session to secure $25 million to fund potential lawsuits against the incoming Trump administration.

Fox News reports:

The draft is part of an effort by California leaders to prepare for a second Trump administration. After Trump was elected, Newsom called a special legislative session and talked of a $25 million “Trump-proof” legal defence fund.

In addition, state lawmakers were lobbying for additional funds.

Senate Budget Chair Scott Wiener proposed legislation seeking $60 million, including funds to create an immigrant detention representation and coordination program, Politico reported.

Under the draft, the state Social Services Department would give state funds to eligible nonprofits and take on administrative duties for the hubs.

The draft does not indicate how much funding the plan requires. However, it said the funds would go toward “community outreach, partnership, legal services staffing positions, and approved administrative costs associated with hub operations,” the Politico report said.

Read More at the Daily Fetched

Cancel Culture, Uncategorized

Elon Musk Slams “Wokepedia” for Blowing $50M on DEI Agenda

Tech entrepreneur Elon Musk has called on his followers to stop donating to the Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit organization behind Wikipedia, citing concerns over the organization’s significant budget allocation to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.

“Stop donating to Wokepedia until they restore balance to their editing authority,” Musk wrote Tuesday on X, the social media platform where he has nearly 210 million followers.

Musk’s comment came in response to a post by the right-leaning commentator “Libs of TikTok,” who highlighted a pie chart showing that 29% of Wikipedia’s $177 million 2023-24 budget is allocated to “equity” and “safety & inclusion.”

According to Wikimedia Foundation’s publicly available financial documents, $51.7 million has been set aside for these purposes.

Specifically, 17.6% of the budget ($31.2 million) is directed toward equity initiatives, while 11.6% ($20.5 million) is dedicated to safety and inclusion.

The largest share of the budget—48.7% ($86.1 million)—is allocated to infrastructure, followed by 22.2% ($39.2 million) for effectiveness measures.

The foundation stated, “Supporting equity represents the second largest part of our programmatic work, with grants and Movement support representing the majority of the budget within the equity goal.”

DEI initiatives, aimed at fostering diversity and inclusion in workplaces, have faced criticism from conservatives, who argue that such policies can lead to reverse discrimination and a shift away from merit-based systems.

The debate over DEI has intensified since corporate America widely adopted these practices following the 2020 death of George Floyd.

However, recent months have seen a reversal of these policies in some companies under pressure from public campaigns led by right-leaning figures like Robby Starbuck.

Notable corporations such as Walmart, Ford Motor Company, Molson Coors, and Jack Daniel’s parent company Brown-Forman have scaled back DEI initiatives.

Wikipedia, which receives approximately 4 billion monthly visits, asserts that it operates with political neutrality.

However, studies and reports have repeatedly pointed out the platform’s left-leaning bias.

Earlier this year, the online encyclopedia came under scrutiny when it removed a reference to Kamala Harris as a “border czar” in one of its entries.

This occurred after Joe Biden endorsed Harris to run against Donald Trump, despite Biden’s earlier assignment of border policy oversight to her during his administration.

A June report from the Manhattan Institute, a libertarian think tank, found that Wikipedia articles tend to portray right-leaning public figures with more negative sentiment, such as anger and disgust, compared to the positive emotions like joy more frequently associated with left-leaning figures.

Similarly, a 2012 study published in the American Economic Review analyzed 28,000 Wikipedia articles on U.S. politics and concluded that the entries leaned Democrat on average.

Larry Sanger, who co-founded Wikipedia with Jimmy Wales in 2001, has also raised concerns about the platform’s political bias.

In a 2021 interview with Unherd.com, Sanger claimed that Democratic-leaning volunteers actively remove content that conflicts with their views, citing the Hunter Biden laptop controversy as an example. “Can you trust it to always give you the truth? Well, it depends on what you think the truth is,” Sanger said.

Sanger and Wales have clashed over the years regarding their respective roles in founding the platform.

Sanger maintains that he co-founded Wikipedia, while Wales describes Sanger as a subordinate employee.

Wales has faced criticism for allegedly editing his own Wikipedia entry to downplay Sanger’s contributions.

As debates over Wikipedia’s neutrality and spending practices continue, Musk’s comments have amplified conservative criticism of the platform’s governance and priorities.

Read More on LifeZette

Economics, Uncategorized

Grocery Store Giant Removes Abortion Pill From Pharmacy Following “Error”

Kroger has removed the abortion pill mifepristone from the Health Savings Club website Monday, a huge win for pro-life supporters everywhere.

The drug appears to have been removed following a story from The Washington Stand, which detailed how mifepristone was available via the website. An email to the outlet from Kroger the following day stated: “The Kroger Company Family of Pharmacies do not carry Mifepristone, nor do we dispense it.” At the time of writing (and at the time they received the statement), TWS claims the drug was still listed on the company site. 

“The Kroger Family of Pharmacies doesn’t carry Mifepristone and was listed on the Kroger Health Savings Club site in error,” a statement later claimed. Within 24 hours of these communications occurring, TWS claims the drug was officially removed from the site.

From The Washington Stand: “Soon after Biden’s Food and Drug Administration announced that retail pharmacies could dispense the abortion pill in January 2023, Kroger along with other major retailers received a letter from 19 state attorneys general warning the companies that they would be violating federal law if they send abortion pills through the mail. But Democratic lawmakers like Senator Richard Blumenthal (Conn.) fired off their own letter in March 2023 demanding that Kroger and other retailers ignore the state AGs and “expand access” to the drug. A year later, CVS and Walgreens both began dispensing the pills, with Sam’s Club joining the list at some point this month. 

“After having quietly followed suit and offering the abortion pill on its site for an unknown period of time, Kroger has apparently backtracked in the wake of press coverage of the listing.”

Million Voices spoke to a representative from Kroger who shared what really happened, and why the pill was listed on the company website. “A third-party organization erroneously listed the pill as available at Kroger – we do not sell, nor have we ever sold, mifepristone. It was an error on a third-party site to list it,” the representative for Kroger said in an email to Million Voices.

It’s unclear what really happened, as Bloomberg Law reported in August 2024 that Christian groups were pressuring Kroger and other major grocery stores, like Costco, Walmart, and Albertsons.

Read More at Million Voices

Uncategorized

“The Chosen” Director Responds To Critics

The Chosen” creator-director Dallas Jenkins defended the portrayal of an interaction between Jesus and Judas Iscariot on a livestream in December.

Apparently some people think that Jenkins’ choices with the scene between Jesus and Judas was “unbiblical,” according to the Christian Post. “You have a choice to make, Judas,” Jesus says in the scene in which Judas challenges Jesus to “reclaim” his “birthright.” “Who [do] you belong to? Who has your heart? I want it, and I’ve had it before. You followed me willingly.”

“I want to continue,” Judas replies. “There’s nothing more that I want than that.”

Jesus takes an emotional Judas’ hand, telling him, “Then I will pray for you. But for now, please leave me in peace.

Why Are People Reacting To This?

“It’s over the issue of, ‘Did Jesus pray for people? Did Jesus pray specifically for Judas? Did Jesus want Judas to change His mind? Did Judas have free will? Was Judas ever saved?’ — all the typical Judas questions started to come up,” Jenkins said during his broadcast. “There’s a measurable amount of people who believe that we got it wrong,” Jenkins added, “that I got it wrong.”

“While I’m somewhat surprised that the concept of Jesus saying the words ‘I’ll pray for you’ are controversial, I’m not actually that surprised that something like this comes up because it’s a sensitive topic,” he added. “Whether it’s Jesus and Judas or whether it’s eternal salvation or not, these are important issues, and that’s why I’m actually glad sometimes when this happens.” 

Jenkins reshaped the debate into a conversation about how best to interpret these things. He also clarified that the work was designed to speak specifically to those seeking a greater understanding about the show. “I’m talking to you, the person who is either genuinely seeking or genuinely trying to understand, or maybe isn’t as familiar with some of these topics or issues, or also has a friend who came to you and said, ‘Why do you watch this heretical show’ and [it would] be good for you to have an answer,” he continued.

Your Own Will

“No, we are not implying that Jesus is going to pray that Judas will change his mind,” he said. “Yes, Judas’ betrayal is part of the Father’s will. It is part of this crucifixion and, ultimately, salvation story. So Jesus did not say in the scene, ‘I’ll pray for you, Judas, that you’ll change your mind from whatever you’re about to do.’”

Jesus “has known for a while that Judas would betray Him,” Jenkins stressed, claiming “we are not implying that at this point in the story [that] Jesus wasn’t sure what was going to happen [or] was hoping things wouldn’t happen bad. Jesus knew.” 

“So no, I’m not saying that Jesus didn’t know or that Jesus was hoping things would change,” Jenkins continued, noting that “Jesus and the Father share the same will and that their wills are inextricably united.”

“To me, it matters little because if Jesus could pray for unbelievers while they were crucifying Him, it seems that Jesus could pray for Judas even while Judas was planning to betray Him,” Jenkins later stated.

Uncategorized

CNN’s Jennings Roasts Dems’ Musk Critique: “Soros Collects Politicians Like Pokémon”

CNN’s Scott Jennings criticized Democrats on Sunday for their opposition to Elon Musk, calling it “hypocritical” in light of the influence wielded by left-wing billionaire George Soros.

Jennings made his remarks during an appearance on State of the Union with CNN host Dana Bash.

The discussion came as Democrats escalated their criticisms of Musk following his opposition to Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson’s original 1,574-page continuing resolution (CR).

The resolution, which included provisions that could cost hundreds of billions of dollars, faced backlash from Musk, who urged voters to oppose lawmakers supporting the measure.

Bash asked Jennings whether Musk’s growing influence might “wear thin” on President-elect Donald Trump.

“I don’t think so. I mean look, they appear to be getting along well,” Jennings responded.

“Musk was very instrumental in his victory, and I hear Democrats criticizing the idea that we have unelected people with too much influence over the government. I invite them to pick up the Wall Street Journal from this week and find out that unelected people have been running the government for the last four years.”

Jennings did not hold back on what he viewed as Democratic hypocrisy. “I hear Democrats criticizing the influence of billionaires on our politics when you’ve got this Soros punk running around collecting Democrat politicians like my kids collect Pokémon cards,” he said.

“So I think all the criticism of Musk coming from the left is totally hypocritical, totally over-the-top, and he is doing something interesting, bringing some transparency to the federal government. It’s not a terrible thing.”

Soros, through Soros Fund Management, has long been a major donor to Democratic politicians, organizations, and progressive causes.

Over 20 district attorneys in cities such as New York and Los Angeles have reportedly received campaign funding from Soros-backed groups.

Former Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascon, a notable recipient of Soros funding, was voted out in November after pursuing far-left policies that critics say weakened law enforcement and hurt small businesses.

In 2023, Soros Fund Management donated $173,710 to Democratic congressional candidates, $183,010 to federal candidates overall, and $850,000 to the Texas Organizing Project (TOP), according to OpenSecrets. TOP advocates for ending “mass incarceration,” reforming immigration policies, and creating a path to citizenship for 11 million undocumented immigrants.

Beyond politics, Soros has extended his influence into media, with his investment firm acquiring over $400 million of debt from Audacy, the second-largest radio network in the U.S., as part of a restructuring agreement.

Read More at LifeZette


Scroll to Top