Former San Diego Sector Chief Border Patrol Agent Aaron Heitke testified before the House Homeland Security Committee, alleging that the Biden-Harris administration intentionally concealed the severity of the ongoing migrant crisis and the rise in terror-linked individuals crossing the U.S. southern border.
Heitke, who retired in the summer of 2023, accused the administration of trying to “quiet the border-wide crisis” through various measures, including the suppression of critical information and the redirection of illegal migrants.
HOLY SH!T
Former Chief BP Agent Aaron Heitke was ordered by Biden-Harris to cover up the disaster at the border:
1. Data hidden on terror encounters 2. $150k flights to fly illegals to TX 3. 0 resources to track fentanyl pic.twitter.com/kxUtEBpxGR
During his testimony, Heitke revealed that while managing the San Diego sector, he was under constant pressure to release illegal aliens into local communities that were unprepared to support them. “I had to release illegal aliens by the hundreds each day into communities who could not support them,” Heitke stated, adding that administration officials devised a plan to move migrants to Texas to avoid media scrutiny.
“To quiet the problem, two flights a week were provided from San Diego to Texas,” Heitke explained. “These flights simply brought aliens that would have been released in San Diego over to Texas.” Each flight reportedly cost $150,000, which Heitke described as the administration’s way of downplaying the border crisis. “This was the administration’s way of trying to quiet the border-wide crisis,” he emphasized.
The most alarming aspect of Heitke’s testimony centered around what he described as a significant rise in the number of “Special Interest Aliens” (SIAs) — individuals suspected of posing national security threats due to their country of origin or terror group affiliations.
Before the Biden administration took office, Heitke noted that the San Diego sector typically apprehended 10 to 15 SIAs per year. However, this number skyrocketed to over 100 in 2022 and continued to grow in subsequent years.
“These are only the ones we caught,” Heitke testified, adding that more than 1.7 million “gotaways” have crossed the border undetected, with their terror affiliations or risks remaining unknown.
Heitke claimed that he was barred from discussing these increases in SIA arrests. “At the time, I was told I could not release any information on this increase in SIAs or mention any of the arrests. The administration was trying to convince the public there was no threat at the border,” Heitke said.
The former chief also revealed that he was directed to move over 2,000 migrants apprehended between the two U.S.-Mexico border fences out of sight of the media.
Former President Donald Trump has announced his upcoming visits to Springfield, Ohio, and Aurora, Colorado, two cities grappling with significant issues due to the influx of illegal migrants. During a rally in Uniondale, New York, Trump said, “I’m going to go there in the next two weeks. I’m going to Springfield, and I’m going to Aurora,” as reported by Just The News.
Springfield, Ohio, has made national headlines for its surge of illegal immigrants from Haiti, with some reports even suggesting that migrants have resorted to hunting local pets and wildlife for food.
The small town, which once had minimal crime, has seen its population swell by 32,000 due to the migrant influx. Trump remarked, “This is a little beautiful town. No crime, no problem. Thirty-two thousand illegal immigrants come into the town… they almost double their population in a period of a few weeks.”
Springfield, overwhelmed by the influx, has been forced to find ways to accommodate illegal migrant children who do not speak English. Trump criticized the local response, especially the decision to hire teachers and interpreters for the migrants. “What the hell is wrong with our country?” he asked, expressing disbelief at the town’s approach.
The economic and civic chaos caused by this migrant surge, particularly in Springfield, underscores the detrimental impact on American workers and communities. Springfield has become a haven for over 20,000 Haitian migrants, many of whom were granted work permits and federal aid under Biden’s economic agenda. This massive influx has driven up housing costs, depressed wages, and pushed American workers to the sidelines.
Trump’s rhetoric has drawn criticism from left-wing voices like Paul Krugman and Adam Serwer, who argue that deporting migrants would harm the town’s economic revival. However, local residents have voiced frustration at being displaced by the government-backed influx.
🚨 BREAKING: SPRINGFIELD, OHIO UPDATE
Local mother and resident of 7+ years says that the 20,000+ Haitians are outpricing and pushing low-income renters like her out of the neighborhood with money from assisted living, food stamps, and other government aid.
U.S. intelligence officials have revealed that Iranian cyber actors hacked materials from former President Donald Trump’s campaign in June and early July and passed the information to the Biden-Harris campaign and various media outlets.
This alarming disclosure was made in a joint statement by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), underscoring a significant attempt by Iran to interfere in the 2024 election to favor Democrats.
WASHINGTON (AP) — FBI: Iranian hackers sent unsolicited information stolen from Trump campaign to people associated with Biden's campaign
he agencies detailed how hackers, linked to Iran, sent emails to individuals associated with Biden’s campaign before he exited the race.
These emails contained portions of non-public information from Trump’s campaign, highlighting the targeted nature of the breach.
The FBI confirmed that Trump’s campaign team was informed of the hack within the last 48 hours and that the Biden-Harris campaign was among the recipients of this stolen data.
According to a senior Trump campaign official, Iranian hackers had stolen sensitive documents from the Trump campaign and leaked them to news outlets, including Politico, The New York Times, and The Washington Post.
Each of these media outlets has refrained from disclosing what specific information they received.
Politico revealed it had begun receiving materials from an anonymous email account in July, with the documents appearing to be a research dossier prepared on Ohio Sen. JD Vance, Trump’s running mate.
The Trump campaign’s national press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, condemned the incident, calling it “further proof the Iranians are actively interfering in the election” to help Vice President Kamala Harris.
Intelligence officials have indicated that Iran views Trump as a threat, citing his administration’s withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal, the reimposition of sanctions, and the targeted killing of Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani in 2020 as key points of tension between the U.S. and Iran.
While the Biden-Harris campaign spokesperson, Morgan Finkelstein, stated that they were unaware of any materials being sent directly to the campaign, she confirmed that individuals associated with Biden’s team had been targeted with phishing attempts.
The Harris campaign referring to itself as “victims” when they received the leaked files from Trump’s campaign, is really perfect encapsulation of both the gaslighting and the non-stop victimhood https://t.co/8gL4n0BUpa
Ryan Routh, a suspected assassin who allegedly targeted former President Donald Trump, had been flagged by U.S. federal agents after returning from Ukraine last year, but the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) failed to take any action.
Routh, who was accused of plotting an assassination attempt on Trump at his West Palm Beach golf club, had previously been involved in recruiting foreign fighters to assist Ukraine in its war against Russia.
The DHS’s lack of follow-up raises concerns about missed opportunities to prevent this alleged assassination attempt.
Routh was intercepted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers in June 2023 when he landed at Honolulu International Airport.
During an interview, Routh revealed that he had spent three months in Ukraine recruiting soldiers from countries like Afghanistan, Moldova, and Taiwan to fight in Ukraine’s war against Russia.
He had previously traveled to Poland and Turkey in 2022 and 2023. Despite these revelations, the Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) division of the DHS declined to pursue the case.
“Subject is a USC who had traveled to Kiev, Ukraine for 3 months to help recruit soldiers from Afghanistan, Moldova, and Taiwan,” the CBP notes read. “Subject stated that he does not get paid for his recruiting efforts and all his work for the Ukrainian government is strictly volunteer work.”
Routh provided the CBP agents with a business card identifying himself as the director of an organization called the “International Volunteer Center.”
The business card listed his recruiting partners across various countries, including Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, and Israel.
Despite the evidence provided during the interview, HSI opted not to follow up on the information, and the case was left unresolved.
Assassin was “known to the FBI…” because of course he was. I’m grateful that Florida was running their own investigation, thanks to Gov DeSantis, or I imagine much of what we find out would never otherwise be known. pic.twitter.com/dODLVvZTyR
Routh’s foreign travel and connections to Ukraine were not the first time he had raised concerns with law enforcement. In 2019, he was under suspicion by the FBI for possessing a firearm as a convicted felon, according to FBI Special Agent in Charge Jeffrey Veltri.
However, no significant action was taken at that time either.
California Governor Gavin Newsom signed two new bills into law on Tuesday, aiming to crack down on the use of “deepfakes” and digital disinformation during elections.
The legislation, seen as controversial, marks a direct response to the rising influence of artificial intelligence (AI) in politics, particularly as AI-generated content becomes more prevalent in social media.
I just signed a bill to make this illegal in the state of California.
You can no longer knowingly distribute an ad or other election communications that contain materially deceptive content — including deepfakes. https://t.co/VU4b8RBf6N
The laws, known as AB 2655 and AB 2839, specifically target politically motivated deepfakes, which are digitally altered videos or images that can portray candidates saying or doing things they never did.
The first law, AB 2655, requires major online platforms to block any “materially deceptive content” related to elections in California before and after election periods.
This covers AI-generated media, including deepfakes. The law defines “materially deceptive content” as audio or visual media that is altered or digitally created, a category that includes political misinformation as well.
The second law, AB 2839, more narrowly targets deepfakes of political candidates in California.
It prohibits any deepfakes that portray a candidate for federal, state, or local office as saying or doing something they never did, if it is likely to damage their reputation or harm their electoral prospects.
The push for these laws came after social media platform X, owned by Elon Musk, featured a deepfake parody of Vice President Kamala Harris.
On his social media platform X (formerly Twitter), Musk voiced his discontent with the new law, calling Newsom “The Joker.” Musk, who has positioned himself as a free speech advocate, claims the legislation infringes on First Amendment rights.
You’re not gonna believe this, but @GavinNewsom just announced that he signed a LAW to make parody illegal, based on this video 🤣🤣 https://t.co/bdykNuxe6G
Following the presidential debate last week, pop singer Taylor Swift endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris in the upcoming election.
The climate conscious singer’s endorsement was perhaps no surprise given that her political positions have often favored Democrats. In the 2018 mid-term elections, Swift endorsed Tennessee Democrats Phil Bredesen and Jim Cooper. In 2020, she publicly endorsed the Biden-Harris ticket.
While predictable, the singer – whose songs often contain references to her own bad decision-making – was expected to carry some weight in convincing moderate “Swifties” to vote Democrat.
However, that’s not happening.
While Donald Trump may “hate” Taylor Swift, Harris must feel the same to some extent too following the release of a YouGov poll on Saturday. Only 8% of respondents to the poll said Swift’s endorsement is “somewhat” or “much more likely” to convince them to vote Democrat. Interestingly, 20% of respondents said they were now “somewhat” or “much less likely” to support Harris after receiving the singer’s backing. The majority of those polled said it had made no difference on their voting intentions (66%).
Many respondents were split as to whether Swift’s endorsement will have a positive effect on Harris’ campaign (32%) or no difference at all (27%). Fans made up 34% of those surveyed, with her biggest supporters being female, registered Democrats who were going to vote Harris regardless.
The poll’s results were humorous to many on social media.
Others speculated that Swift’s reputation as a wealthy celebrity failed to resonate with millions of Americans.
Andrew Cuomo does not want you to read this article. He definitely does not want you to watch the above video. He would prefer that you forget his past and let his acts and omissions during the Coronavirus pandemic be lost to posterity, far away from today’s news cycle.
Andrew Cuomo wants you to forget because remembering his past dooms his future aspirations for a political comeback, which includes growing rumblings of a possible run to become the Mayor of New York City. So, he cannot have the horrible truth of his tenure during the pandemic get in the way of his ambition.
That is why Andrew Cuomo was so angry and combative while offering public testimony before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic this week. That is why he railed against the Subcommittee’s 48-page memorandum detailing how Cuomo’s mismanagement of New York State’s response to COVID-19 cost the lives of over 15,000 seniors exposed to the deadly virus while in nursing homes. That is why he blustered at new findings re-confirming older findings from his own state that his administration played number games with the death toll of those seniors to cover-up his political complicity.
It’s a story of political negligence powered by an insatiable political ambition that, if forgotten, may happen again.
***
Here’s a little hometown trivia for you from my home state, which I often refer to as “The People’s Republic of New York”: the last time an Empire State governor was voted out of office in an election was Gov. Mario Cuomo when a relatively unknown state senator named George Pataki defeated him.
That happened in 1994.
Since then, thirty years of gubernatorial succession has been marred by controversy. Pataki chose not to run for a fourth term amid all-time low approval numbers. His successor, that “f***ing steamroller” Eliot Spitzer resigned as “Client No. 9” to an upscale call girl. Then, Spitzer’s successor, David Paterson, withdrew from his campaign after news broke that his administration improperly intervened in a domestic violence case against one of his closest aides.
Which brings us to Andrew Cuomo. After winning a third term in 2018, Cuomo, who positioned himself as a foil to then-President Donald Trump, found the media spotlight during the pandemic. Indeed, many found reassurance in the routine that Gov. Cuomo’s daily televised briefings developed into in the spring of 2020. Meanwhile, others fell for Andrew’s appearances on his brother’s primetime show, dubbed by some as the “Cuomo Brothers Comedy Hour” on CNN).
As Andrew Cuomo reveled in his new-found popularity, he parlayed his stewardship during the pandemic into financial opportunities, like his weird “flatten the curve” poster that he took much pride in creating, and his multi-million-dollar book deal. He even won an Emmy, for goodness sakes.
On the surface, the summer of 2020 became the summer of the “Cuomosexual.”
Yet, underneath the bella figura Cuomo and his staff created for him laid a hubris beyond imagining that left a trail of failure, mismanagement, and, according to the opinion of many, death in his wake.
In the infancy of the pandemic in March of 2020, Cuomo and his Department of Health issued a flurry of advisories intended to guide hospitals and health care facilities. On March 25, 2020, Cuomo, having already withdrawn a nursing home’s ability to deny care to an incoming patient, further ordered that “[n]o resident shall be denied re-admission or admission to the [nursing home] solely based on a confirmed or suspected diagnosis of COVID19.” Cuomo further ordered that “[nursing homes] are prohibited from requiring a hospitalized resident who is determined medically stable to be tested from COVID-19 prior to admission or re-admission.”
That latter directive not only ran counter to federal guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control (CDC), but also to common sense. What kind of a “leader” would mandate in a prohibition on testing for a novel virus during a pandemic?
The effect of this now-infamous advisory was tragic. Effectively, Cuomo forced the most vulnerable population of New Yorkers to be heavily exposed to a deadly virus.
Oftentimes, it is not a poor political choice that does in a politician. It’s the cover-up that follows. Such is the case here, as Cuomo and his administration compounded his errors in judgment by lying about the true extent of the death toll that his Orders caused. In January of 2021, New York’s own attorney general, Letitia James, issued a report finding that Cuomo’s administration and his Department of Health undercounted nursing home resident deaths by approximately 50 percent.
But, even these tens of thousands of deaths were not enough to taint Cuomo and his legacy to the point of political radioactivity. Though damaged by the nursing home scandal, Cuomo persevered to the dismay of many. It was only after a boatload of claims of sexual harassment came to light thanks to a second report from AG James detailing inappropriate and unwanted advances of affection from Cuomo that he ultimately resigned in disgrace.
Gone was the praise and the fame. Gone was the book deal. And even the Emmy, which the International Academy of Television Arts and Sciences stripped Cuomo of the day after he resigned.
Cuomo laid low for years to allow the shock and shame subside; to allow his disgrace to fall into the memory-hole. He began to re-emerge in 2023, taking media appearances again. He appeared on friendly media who seemingly chose to enable their disgraced friend. Friends like Anthony Scaramucci, who sat idly by as Cuomo painted himself as the victim of a conspiracy, allowing Cuomo to lash out at the families of loved ones lost during the pandemic who had since become politically engaged. “The attacks are just vicious. Vicious!: Cuomo proclaimed with a face of disgust.“ ‘You didn’t care about people in nursing homes.’ How dare you suggest such a vile thing?”
Cuomo’s re-emergence in the fall of 2023 coincided with whispers indicating to allies of his interest in running for New York City mayor if fellow Democrat Eric Adams would become entangled within the federal investigations that have once again cropped up in the news cycle.
It’s a shame for Cuomo that those “vile” family members never relented in spreading the truth about him. The perseverance of organizations like Voices for Seniors and other notable personalities like Fox News’s Janice Dean culminated into the release of the Subcommittee’s memo, which detailed just how deep Cuomo and his staff’s cover-up of their mismanagement went. It turns out that Cuomo knew that nursing homes presented a real risk of infection, calling it a “nightmare” scenario. Yet, his administration still issued that March 25 Order, thus perpetuating that nightmare scenario.
To this day, even Cuomo wants us to believe he doesn’t know who signed off on the March 25 order; other than, according to his sworn testimony, telling you it was not him. Curiously, that viewpoint runs counter to other Cuomo staffers, including his own Health Commissioner, Dr. Howard Zucker, who testified that during the pandemic, “everything ended up having to go through the Governor’s Office.”
With the insurmountable weight of the Subcommittee’s findings brought to bear, Cuomo remained stubbornly insolent, even refusing to apologize to the gathered audience of those “vile” family members in attendance. Cuomo dismissed such demands as a political stunt.
It is in those moments where Cuomo refused to capitulate that he let his mask slip and reveal his true nature; that he is, at his core, an arrogant, audacious and irredeemable creature of political opportunism. No amount of re-packaging or political window dressing will ever change him.
Seeing this true nature, Rep. Elise Stefanik boldly proclaimed that during a shouting match with Cuomo that “You will never hold elected office again.” I wish I had Stefanik’s confidence, as the voting populace in “The People’s Republic of” New York were fooled once by Cuomo.
Which is why it is so important that we never forget what he did; so we never allow him the opportunity to do anything like that again.
Gene Berardelli is a street-smart New York-based trial attorney with a successful track record representing conservative candidates and a solid reputation as an award-winning podcaster and as the award-winning author of the Amazon bestseller Schnooks, Crooks, Liars & Scoundrels: A Field Guide to Identifying Political Buffoons. He currently hosts Buffoon of the Week! whcih is available on YouTube, Rumble and other video-hosting platforms, featuring daily original content which seek to find the dumbest political newsmakers each week.
A CNN focus group member in the swing state of Pennsylvania said she plans to vote for Donald Trump as her “life was better when Trump was in office.”
CNN coordinated a focus group among voters in Erie County, PA, which many consider to be a pivotal battleground in the upcoming presidential election. Pennsylvania’s 19 electoral college votes are essential for both Trump and Kamala Harris if either wants to win the race to the White House, with Erie County notable for being a jurisdiction which could tip the result in favor of either candidate.
All 12 voters were undecided prior to the presidential debate on Tuesday, September 10.
Among them was one woman, who previously voted for Trump and said the debate had convinced her to once again support the GOP candidate.
“I think it’s important to remember that we’re voting for the leader of our country. Not who we like the most, or who we want at our wedding party, but [the candidate] who is actually going to make our country better,” she told the network. “We’re in an incredibly unique situation where we’ve had both of the candidates in office before, and we’ve gotten to see what they would do.”
“When facts come to facts, my life was better when Trump was in office,” she added, noting a stronger economy, lower inflation, and the risk of re-electing Harris to “fix the problems that her administration has caused.”
One part that stood out from the debate was when Harris was asked if voters were better off than when the Biden-Harris administration took office – and replied in length to everything except that question.
Many agreed with the voter on social media.
Others were deeply critical of the Democratic nominee.
Donald Trump used one of Kamala Harris’ own tricks against her in the first presidential debate between the two.
The debate, which is the only scheduled head-to-head between the two at this moment in time, featured muted microphones to minimize shouting matches throughout the 90-minute affair. Although the television audience could only hear muffled comments when the mics were off, the overlap in words proved distracting for those in the studio.
Many speculated that Harris didn’t want mics to be muted because it would prevent her from making a snarky remark that the liberal media could turn into the “line of the night.” Her “I’m speaking” moment during her 2020 debate with Mike Pence comes to mind. In her only memorable moment from that debate (because she has no real substance), Harris said; “Mr. Vice President, I’m speaking,” when Pence interrupted her.
Instead, mics were muted – and it was Trump to deliver her own line to her.
As Trump discussed Harris’ previous support for defunding the police, the Democrat said “that’s not true” into her muted microphone.
“Wait a minute, I’m talking now if you don’t mind. Please. Does that sound familiar?” Trump replied to a stunned Harris.
Trump’s comments were a reference to the 2020 vice presidential debate between Harris and Mike Pence.
Social media held widespread praise for the former president.
Another commentor was relieved that Harris had been muted.
With Labor Day in the rear-view mirror, the 2024 election cycle is sure to heat up, and campaign-related announcements are sure to be a frequent occurrence. Some will be meaningful. Others will have zero value.
Clearly falling into the latter was former Congresswoman Liz Cheney’s endorsement of the Democratic Party’s installed designee, Vice President Kamala Harris. Cheney did not join Harris or her team on a stage or take in the adulation of a raucous crowd living on joy and vibes at a campaign rally. Instead, Cheney’s endorsement came at a very low-key event hosted by Duke University’s Sanford School of Public Policy.
Cheney’s endorsement comes as no surprise to political observers, given her stewardship of the January 6th Select Committee and her outspoken animus towards her own party’s duly elected nominee, former President Donald Trump:
“As a conservative, as someone who believes in and cares about the Constitution, I have thought deeply about this and because of the danger that Donald Trump poses, not only am I not voting for Donald Trump, but I will be voting for Kamala Harris,” Cheney said.
The endorsement represents a complete 180-degree turnaround for Cheney, who is on record in tweets calling Harris a “radical liberal” whose positions are to the left of the likes of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren who would “recreate America in the image of what’s happening on the streets of Portland & Seattle” during the so-called “Summer of Love” from 2020. Cheney repeats those sentiments in a Fox News that has recently re-surfaced since Cheney’s endorsement:
Liz Cheney says Kamala Harris is a “radical liberal.”@Liz_Cheney has such TDS that she’s now pledged to vote for someone who goes against everything she once said she stood for.
Cheney is just an awful person. But you already know that.
Notice how Cheney framed her endorsement. She did not laud Harris’s abilities to govern. She did not endorse Harris’s policy positions or plans (probably because the Harris campaign has largely communicated in platitudes.) She certainly did not endorse Harris’s values, which she claimed in a CNN interview with Dana Bash have not changed, despite her shifting her positions based upon the political winds of the say. The political hypocrisy is palpable.
Cheney’s endorsement is mere the furtherance of her vendetta against Trump. A vendetta which started from opportunism after January 6, 2021. A vendetta which grew after then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi handpicked Cheney to serve on that kangaroo court that was the January 6th Select Committee. And a vendetta that rendered Cheney a political afterthought when she was soundly defeated in the 2022 Republic primary by her successor Harriet Hageman.
Cheney’s endorsement mirrors much of the 2020 strategy which resulted in President Joe Biden’s election: don’t vote for Harris, vote against Trump. It’s Cheney’s wishy-washy way of feigning her conservative bona fides while jumping ship from a Republican party that has cast her aside in favor of more credible, good-faith conservatives like Hageman.
One would be hard pressed to find a better example of a politician being a “Republican in Name Only,” a term reserves for the old guard of the Republican Party whose moment passed the moment Donald Trump won the presidency in 2016.
Apparently, Cheney seems to believe that her endorsement, such that it is in her diminished capacity within her own party, holds value for the Harris team in bringing in cross-over votes. But the political reality of her situation would tend to indicate this to be nothing more than vanity. In August of 2022, polling found that 2 out of every 3 Republicans held a negative view of Cheney. Other polling from around the same time found that 3 in 5 Democrats favorably viewed Cheney.
That translates into very little needle movement in favor of Harris. Essentially, Cheney’s endorsement is merely preaching to the choir.
Chalk up Cheney’s endorsement to the political equivalent of the shocking news that water is wet, and that the sky is blue. It’s political narcissism; an attempt at relevancy in a news cycle dominated by the election. If Cheney’s opinion had value, the Harris campaign would have Liz Cheney thrust into the national spotlight. Instead, Cheney is relegated to a policy forum, earning coverage from confirmation biased media making more of her statement than its actual weight.
***
Gene Berardelli is a street-smart New York-based trial attorney with a successful track record representing conservative candidates and a solid reputation as an award-winning podcaster and as the award-winning author of the Amazon bestseller Schnooks, Crooks, Liars & Scoundrels: A Field Guide to Identifying Political Buffoons. He currently hosts Buffoon of the Week! on YouTube and Rumble, featuring daily original content which seek to find the dumbest political newsmakers each week.
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
