Uncategorized

Uncategorized

Judge Orders the Release of Transgender Alleged Tesla Vandal

/

A federal judge has ordered the release of the alleged Tesla dealership in Kansas City, Missouri, alleged transgender arsonist, citing strong community ties.

According to KMBC News, U.S. Magistrate Judge Jessica Hedges ordered the release of Owen McIntire, 19, after agreeing with his lawyers that he has no criminal record and has “strong ties to his community in Missouri.” 

The alleged Tesla dealership vandal’s lawyer also cited his “medical and mental health needs.” McIntire reportedly suffers from numerous psychosocial and developmental conditions, such as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), depression, and gender dysphoria. The biological male who identifies as a woman is also allegedly on the autism spectrum, raising questions as to whether he was an easy pickings for the radical left ideology that exploits the most vulnerable.

Recently, the United Kingdom ordered that all transgender teens be screened for autism and mental health before being subjected to irreversible medical and surgical mutilation.

“He also receives gender-affirming medical care, which began in March of this year and is likely to be interrupted or terminated entirely if he remains in pretrial detention,” the judge stated. “This care, along with mental health support, is integral to his wellbeing. By moving back home with his parents, he will have access to the care providers who are familiar with him and his specific needs.”

However, the Department of Justice fought to keep McIntire behind bars due to public safety concerns and the likelihood of him facing terrorism-related charges.

Meanwhile, McIntire faces federal charges of “a single count of unlawful possession of an unregistered destructive device, and one count of malicious damage by fire of any property used in interstate commerce.” These charges should send a strong message to other would-be Tesla vandals that they will bear personal responsibility for their politically motivated actions.

“Let me be extremely clear to anyone who still wants to firebomb a Tesla property: you will not evade us,” Attorney General Pam Bondi warned. “You will be arrested. You will be prosecuted. You will spend decades behind bars. It is not worth it.”

According to a criminal complaint, McIntire used an incendiary device, namely a Molotov cocktail, on one parked Cybertruck valued at between $105,485 and $107,485. However, the ensuing blaze spread to another parked Cybertruck and two charging stations, each valued at roughly $550. One of the incendiary devices that the alleged Tesla vandal threw refused to ignite, suggesting that the damage would have been more significant.

Meanwhile, the suspected Tesla vandal will live with his parents in home confinement under strict monitoring, including electronic monitoring.

In a separate incident, a US federal grand jury in Arizona indicted a 35-year-old man for allegedly setting Tesla vehicles ablaze. He reportedly poured gas on a dealership and three Tesla vehicles, destroying one Cybertruck. 

The suspected Tesla vandal was also caught allegedly carrying a hand-drawn map identifying local Tesla dealerships, suggesting that he was planning more attacks before his arrest. He faces between five and 20 years in prison and a fine of $250,000. 

Uncategorized

Another Trump Victory: Walmart Announces Buy “American-Made” Initiative

/

The Trump administration continues to record remarkable progress in bringing back manufacturing despite the media-driven hysteria about the economy. Coinciding with Trump’s 100 days in office celebrations, retail giant Walmart announced a new buy American-made campaign dubbed “Grow With US.” 

The program, which aims to help small businesses, according to Axios, will make it “easier for U.S.-based entrepreneurs to navigate the complexities of retail and bring their products to a national stage.”

“We anticipate thousands of small businesses will take advantage of these free resources over the coming years,” John Furner, Walmart U.S. president and CEO, told Axios.

“Walmart has a long history of investing in U.S. manufacturing. Since Sam Walton first launched a ‘Buy American’ initiative in 1985, we have been committed to sourcing and selling products that support American jobs,” states the retail giant.

Since March 2021, the company has incrementally invested in a $350 billion fund to promote products made, grown, or assembled in the U.S. The initiative aims to create roughly 750,000 jobs within ten years.

In the 1980s, Walmart’s founder Sam Walton was concerned about losing customers due to factories and small businesses closing. He therefore aimed to boost domestic production by embedding the “Buy America” motto into the company’s corporate culture. Before Americans were taught to hate their country by liberals, the company’s products proudly displayed the “American made” labels. 

In the 1990s, many companies started shifting their production abroad, primarily to China. Since then, the company has resorted to importing most of its products from the communist nation, and the “Buy American” initiative became nothing more than a passing comment on corporate pages. 

Nonetheless, Walmart claims that more than “two-thirds of our total product spend on items made, grown or assembled in the United States” and that small businesses account for over 60% of its US suppliers.  It also claims that eligible small businesses can apply for financial support via Walmart’s Early Payment Program. Companies can also pitch already completed products for consideration.

“In addition to Grow with US, we recently announced that applications for our annual Open Call event will open June 24, 2025. Open Call offers U.S.-based small and medium-sized businesses the chance to pitch their shelf-ready products — made, grown, or assembled in the United States — directly to Walmart and Sam’s Club merchants,” the company stated.

Meanwhile, Walmart’s “Grow with US” initiative coincided with rumors that online retail giant Amazon would display tariff costs. However, the company denied those allegations after the Trump administration described the initiative as a hostile political act. 

“This is a hostile and political act by Amazon,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters. “Why didn’t Amazon do this when the Biden administration allowed inflation to reach the highest level in 40 years?”

The alleged hostile act resulted in Amazon shares dropping by 2% in anticipation of the e-commerce giant’s collision with the Trump administration. However, the company’s spox tried to soften the blow by claiming that the plan was only under consideration by the ultra-low-cost Amazon Haul store but was never approved.

“The team that runs our ultra low cost Amazon Haul store considered the idea of listing import charges on certain products,” Amazon spokeswoman Rachael Lighty told USA TODAY. “This was never approved and is not going to happen.”

Race, Uncategorized

Black Woman Coming Back to America After Finding Out Africa is Worse

/

As you know, it’s very difficult to be a minority in the modern United States of America. The U.S. is widely known for being among the most hostile countries in the world for anyone who is not white, for gay people, for trans people, for religious minorities, and for all women. 

Except it’s not because that’s the opposite of the truth.

It is breathtaking how American citizens who enjoy the highest standard of living and the most legal freedom in the world believe they are living in an oppressive authoritarian regime. And they really do seem to believe it. Modern feminists get dolled up in Handmaid’s Tale costumes to protest the “misogyny” of the U.S.. What’s the misogyny, where’s the hatred of women? Why, it’s in any law that restricts any woman from having an abortion at any time. Outlaw third trimester abortions? Misogyny. 

And for black people? It’s never been worse. Sixty-one years since the passage of the Civil Rights Act, and black people are held down harder and more cruelly than ever before. Sure, they have full legal enfranchisement, they’re picked for college admissions and granted professional jobs preferentially over more qualified white candidates, but someone actually arrested some black people for brawling in Waffle House. 

OK, you might say, but what about the hundreds to thousands of innocent, unarmed black men killed by police every year? That’s what people who self-identified as “very liberal” actually believe. A survey by Skeptic.com found that those who identified their politics this way said they believed U.S. police (all assumed to be white) kill 1,000 or more unarmed black men every year. 

The actual number every year? About 20 to 35 – most of which are justified, such an involving an unarmed black man grabbing for a weapon.

The adage about good times creating weak men (and women) is obviously true. Only extremely comfortable, privileged people can begin to believe that they are actually held down and oppressed. They simply haven’t had any real hard times, so they make them up in their minds.

So it is with this young black woman, an American who decided to escape what she believes is the racist hell-hole called the United States to live in the African country of Ghana. Turns out, though, that living in a third-world country isn’t all its cracked up to be. In a social media video, the woman complains about the bribery and fraud expected in Ghana, as well as about the “bullsh*t animals and scorpions. 

Predictably, social media users were not entirely sympathetic:

Tee-hee:

Uncategorized

Complicit? California Democrats Send Another Child Sex Trafficking Bill Into Oblivion – LGBTQ Concerns Raised

/

The Democrat-dominated California legislature is reluctant to pass a bill to protect children under 18 years from sex trafficking. Introduced by Sacramento Democrat Assemblywoman Maggy Krell, Assembly Bill 379 (AB 379) aims to protect children under 18 years from sex solicitation and child trafficking.

“I want to solve two problems with this bill: One, we have to create more resources for victims like Julie and the thousands of other victims who are being trafficked,” the Assemblywoman explained. “And two: we have to crack down on the men who are buying them for sex. That’s what Assembly Bill 379 does. 

“It creates a law that allows law enforcement to intervene, when men are out on the prowl trying to buy victims for sex. It also makes it chargeable as a felony when those victims are under 18 years old.”

In 2024, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 1414 into law, making it a felony to solicit sex from children under the age of 16. However, soliciting or purchasing sex from 16- and 17-year-old children was a wobbler, allowing prosecutors to charge it as a misdemeanor or felony.

Introduced by Bakersfield Republican state Senator Shannon Grove and Assemblywoman Krell, SB 1414 aimed to make it a felony to solicit sex from all children under the age of 18. According to Krell, banning solicitation across the board would help to protect children from sex trafficking, which hinges on the ability to purchase sex from minors without serious consequences.

Nonetheless, California Democrats neutered the bill, capping the age at 15 years and below for felony charges to apply. Additionally, they attempted to kill it by sending it to the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Although he did not make any effort to impose stricter penalties for all solicitations below 18 years, California Governor Gavin Newsom intervened and helped push the bipartisan bill forward until it became law.

Given the obvious shortcomings of SB 1414, Assemblywoman Krell introduced Assembly Bill 379 (AB 379) to make it a crime to solicit or purchase sex from children under 18. 

However, AB 379 faces the same fate as SB 1414 after Democrats sent it to the Assembly Public Safety Committee to gather dust. Additionally, in due consideration of the looming deadline, the bill was dropped from the Committee’s agenda, further delaying it indefinitely. 

Some committee members, such as Assembly Majority Whip Mark González have raised concerns that the bill would disproportionately affect the LGBTQ community and people of color. Once again, Democrats will likely prioritize perceived implications on the LGBTQ community and ignore the plight of child sex trafficking victims.

Meanwhile, Assemblywoman Krell’s work in fighting child sex trafficking is undeniable, regardless of her political affiliations. She has prosecuted child sex predators, demanded tougher sentences, and consistently raised alarm over child sex trafficking in California, which her fellow party members are seemingly uninterested in stopping.

“We’re still seeing throughout California girls being sold for commercial sex, seeing a lot of teenagers. Creeps in cars lining up to buy teenagers. We need to do more to address demand,” she said in support of the bill.

This time, it remains to be seen if Gov. Newsom will use his influence to revive the bill out of genuine concern or simply for political grandstanding.

Uncategorized

California Bill to End the Epidemic of Trans-Identifying Male Rapists in Female Prisons Shot Down by Democrats

/

On April 29, 2025, the California legislature shot down a bill prohibiting trans-identifying men with a history of sexual violence from being housed in women’s correctional facilities. 

The Golden State allows prisoners to be incarcerated in correctional facilities matching their preferred gender identity after passing the Transgender Respect, Agency, and Dignity Act, or SB132, in 2021. Other states with similar laws are Maine, New York, Minnesota, New Jersey, and Washington.  

However, safety concerns for biological women have persisted, prompting state Sen. Shannon Grove to introduce SB311. If it passed, the law would’ve required the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to provide a secure facility to house transgender-identifying men in women’s prisons to protect the security needs of biological women.

Additionally, it would’ve ban biological men who identify as women and are registered sex offenders from being housed in women’s facilities.

“Any inmate convicted of an offense for which they are required to register pursuant to Section 290, except for biological women at birth, shall be ineligible for housing at a women’s prison.”

Currently, California law requires the CDCR to consider each transgender inmate’s request for transfer to a female facility. Such transfer requests do not consider the inmate’s sexual violence history, whether they have intact male genitalia, or have undergone gender transition procedures. 

About 898 transgender-identifying men have requested to be transferred to women’s facilities, of which 45 have been effected, while 208 are still pending.

Meanwhile, the CDCR is aware of potential intimate relations between transgender-identifying male prisoners and their biological counterparts and distributes condoms in prison.

Similarly, it is aware that biological female inmates are afraid of potential sexual violence from transgender-identifying male counterparts. Physical violence and other forms of degrading and demeaning attacks on biological female inmates by transgender inmates have been widely reported.

Over one quarter of inmates have experienced such incidents, including sexual assaults by biological male inmates who identify as women, while two-thirds are afraid for their safety. 

Several high-profile cases of sexual assault by trans-identifying individuals have been reported in California and other states. 

In 2024, Tremaine Carroll, a six-foot-tall biological man who identifies as a woman was accused of raping two inmates one of whom became pregnant and also attempting to intimidate a witness to stop them from testifying. Carroll had been transferred to the Central California Women’s Facility (CCWF) in Chowchilla in 2021 when SB132 became law. 

Ironically, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) used him as proof that trans-identifying men were not a threat to the safety of biological female inmates. While the case is still ongoing, he was eventually transferred to the Salinas Valley State Prison male facility under California’s Three Strikes Law.

Female inmate Krystal Gonzalez, who was sexually trafficked at 13, was also allegedly repeatedly raped by a transgender detainee and reportedly faced a disciplinary action when she reported the incident. 

Seemingly, SB311 could fail to pass as California Democrats prioritize the convenience of transgender individuals over the safety of biological women. 

Uncategorized

Democrats Visit Anti-Israel Protester in ICE’s “Harrowing” Detention Like “Nazi Concentration Camps”

/

Democrats continue to disrespect Americans by siding with illegal immigrants and with people who hate our values and do not respect our laws. 

On Tuesday, April 22, a group of democrats visited the pro-Hamas protesters they claim are “unlawfully held in harrowing conditions.” 

Ironically, numerous American hostages remain hostage in Gaza under actual harrowing conditions, but you never see the same outrage from these democrats.

Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA), Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), and Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA) were among the group of five Democrats who visited the anti-Israeli protesters, Mahmoud Khalil and Rumeysa Ozturk, whom Pressley described as her “constituent” despite both being foreign-born citizens who cannot vote in American elections. 

Out-of-state Democrats Reps. Troy Carter (LA) and Bennie Thompson (MS) also joined the delegation to show solidarity with the anti-Israeli protesters.

Born to Palestinian parents in Syria, Khalil, 30, a Columbia University alumnus, was arrested on March 9, 2025, by immigration officials coordinating with the State Department while leading anti-Israeli protests at the institution. 

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) accused him of involvement in pro-Hamas activities. Khalil who has barely condemned the kidnapping of American citizens by Hamas, compared the detention conditions to “Nazi concentration camp.” 

“I feel ashamed to compare my conditions in ICE detention with Nazi concentration camps, yet, some aspects of Frankl’s experience resonate,” he wrote.

Even Hamas hostages who were held in underground tunnels, almost starved, witnessed and underwent physical and mental abuse, and were forced to participate in Hamas propaganda videos, had more respect for Nazi concentration camps victims and would not casually compare themselves. 

It’s mind-boggling that a foreigner, who is accorded the privilege of being in the country and attend an elite government-funded university, and still enjoys every civil right in the books, even meeting politicians, could compare himself to  Frankl, who was not guaranteed the next meal or even being alive the next second.

“Khalil led activities aligned to Hamas, a designated terrorist organization,” DHS tweeted.

Trump’s Border Czar Tom Homan warned anti-Israel protesters that, unlike under the Biden administration, they could no longer get away with spreading terrorist propaganda while destroying government property.

“You can’t go and call for the annihilation of Israel and take over a college campus and take over a college building and destroy government property. You can’t hand out literature supporting a terrorist organization.”

He also noted that a visa or resident alien status were privileges that hinged on the holders’ ability to respect the laws of the country. 

“They’re not going to get away with it under the Trump administration. When you come to this country, either on a visa or you become a resident alien, that’s a privilege. But with that privilege comes certain rules. You can’t violate [the] law.”

Turkish-born Ozturk was arrested at Massachusetts’ Tufts University while engaging in anti-Israel activism. He also co-authored an anti-Israeli op-ed piece calling for the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) against the Jewish state. 

According to the seemingly leftist Anti-Defamation League (ADL), BDS advocates for Palestine’s right to self-determination while denying Israel’s right to exist. Even leftist Soros-backed American Jewish Committee acknowledges that while BDS advocates for “peaceful” resistance, the movement leadership wishes for the elimination of the Jewish state. Even Harvard, which is tangled in lawfare against Trump and allows anti-Israeli protests, somehow accommodates the perception that BDS is anti-Semitic.

Uncategorized

Sweden Begins Paying Immigrants to Voluntarily Leave the Country and the European Union

/

After accepting the mass influx of refugees under the European Union’s liberal Marxist immigration policies heralded by Angela Merkel et al., Sweden is now desperate to get them out of the country, even to the point of paying them to leave.

Stockholm just announced an ambitious program that will pay immigrant families a maximum of SEK 600,000 ($61,134) to relocate outside the European Union. Spouses/cohabitants also qualify for a maximum of SEK 500,000 ($50,933), while individual adults receive a maximum of SEK 350,000 ($35,974). Families with children under 18 years also qualify for an additional SEK 25,000 ($2,490) per child. Previously, the country had a smaller voluntary remigration grant of SEK 40,000 (€3,903), which only one immigrant took. 

“So far, few people have taken advantage of the opportunity to receive benefits. In the budget bill for 2025, the government announced that the grant will be increased sharply in 2026,” the Ministry of Justice wrote.

The scheme is proof that the European Union’s unchecked immigration policy, which forced individual countries to accept illegal immigrants, has failed, leaving individual countries to deal with the mess. The EU has been fighting with Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic for refusing to take part in the refugee resettlement program that imposed quotas for each country.

Nonetheless, Sweden refuses to accept to acknowledge the failure of unchecked immigration and presents the resettlement scheme as a noble cause to help marginalized people resettle and start life.

“This is about giving people who feel excluded or who haven’t found a place in Swedish society the opportunity for a dignified return and a new beginning elsewhere,” Migration Minister Johan Forssell told the Swedish TT media outlet.

Since most migrants depend on the Swedish welfare system, especially those from Islamic countries who have refused to integrate, the country seemingly prefers a one-time payment, instead of supporting them indefinitely. While promoting the program, Sweden inadvertently acknowledged that it was dealing with reintegration issues.

“Today, there are a large number of people who immigrated to Sweden but who for various reasons have failed to become part of the Swedish community despite being here for a long time,” said Sweden Democrats’ immigration spokesman Ludvig Aspling. 

However, the spokesperson did not mince words about Sweden’s desire to return immigrants to their countries of origin or at least a third country. Seemingly, deporting them is impossible under the tight control of the EU bureaucrats in Brussels.

“Our starting point is that in this case, it is best to return to your home country, as long-term exclusion entails very high costs for society. Financial support for this purpose can increase both the incentives for return and the opportunities for re-establishment upon returning home.”

Meanwhile, Sweden says it has a robust mechanism to prevent immigrants from exploiting the system by taking the grants and sneaking back into the country. Additionally, only those who relocate outside the European Union and selected countries will be eligible.

“But this won’t be a free ticket. If they return to Sweden, they’ll be required to pay the money back,” Forssell said. 

While the most ambitious so far, Sweden is hardly the only European country paying immigrants to leave. Denmark pays immigrants over $15,000 to leave, while France offers $2,800, Germany roughly $2,000, and Norway $1,400.

Considering that immigrants enjoy special privileges in the EU and also benefit from the vast welfare system, this immigration policy is doomed to fail. 

Meanwhile, Sweden continues to grapple with violent crimes perpetrated by immigrants.

Uncategorized

Jasmine Crockett Schooled Over Woke Admiral Chatfield’s Firing After “Ego” Comments

/

On April 8, Sean Parnell, the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs and Chief Pentagon Spokesman, announced that SecDef Pete Hegseth had removed U.S. Navy Vice Admiral Shoshana Chatfield as the U.S. representative to NATO’s Military Committee.

Parnell explained that her removal was due to a loss of confidence in her ability to lead but thanked her for many years of service.

“Secretary Hegseth has removed U.S. Navy Vice Admiral Shoshana Chatfield from her position as U.S. representative to NATO’s military committee due to a loss of confidence in her ability to lead. The Defense Department is grateful for her many years of military service.”

Texas Democrat congresswoman Jasmine Crockett attempted to spin the narrative, only to end up potentially justifying her termination. The far-left squad member claimed that Chatfield was removed for refusing to hang President Trump’s and Hegseth’s portraits. 

“They fired Navy Vice Admiral Shoshana Chatfield—not because she couldn’t do the job, but because she wouldn’t hang up pictures of Trump and Hegseth. This ain’t about merit—it’s about ego.”

However, the Pentagon Spokesman did not hesitate to school her about the military’s code of conduct. Unlike the rudderless, leaderless, and lawless Democratic Party, the military has a strict policy on insubordination and refusal to follow lawful orders.

“Congresswoman, I realize this may be a foreign concept to you but here at the DoD if you disrespect the chain of command & don’t do your job, you will be replaced. Period.”

By virtue of Trump being elected as President, who is also the Commander in Chief, and Hegseth being confirmed by Congress as the Secretary of Defense, they both have the authority to issue non-negotiable orders. If Chatfield refused to hang the portraits as ordered, it surely does not make sense for her to continue serving an institution whose leaders she does not recognize. 

While she may not approve of what Trump and Hegseth are doing with the military, she is obligated to obey lawful orders regardless of personal political beliefs. The military cannot tolerate rebellious officials as that undermines its readiness and warfighting capabilities, which Trump and Hegseth promised to restore. 

Meanwhile, Chatfield’s firing might be related to the Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to de-Wokify the military. The president had promised to remove woke officials from top military positions, and Chatfield was likely hired under Biden’s DEI policies and was advocating for the same. 

“I want to see members of this team offer each other respect for differences, for diversity, for the dialogue from which ideas and collaboration emerge,” Chatfield said in 2019. 

The admiral was also the first female president of the Naval War College, which she joined in 2019, and she rose through the ranks rather too quickly. Her continued presence in the military was likely a relic of a bygone woke era.

Chatfield’s removal is the third seemingly woke-related termination of female officers. Earlier, Trump had fired Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Lisa Franchetti and Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. C.Q. Brown.

Uncategorized

Scott Jennings Schools Leftists on the Differences between Illegal Immigrants and American Citizens

/

CNN’s token conservative voice, Scott Jennings, reality-checked Democrats who are fearmongering about ongoing Trump’s mass deportations. The left has been lying to American citizens, telling them that they could be picked up on the streets and deported to some of the most brutal prisons in El Salvador.

One such fearmonger, civil and criminal attorney Donte Mills, appeared on CNN’s show alongside Jennings and attempted to perpetuate the same narrative. He claimed that the administration could deport American citizens by accident and that “it could happen to anybody,” allowing the former special assistant for George W. Bush to educate him. 

Jennings started reminding Mills that American voters gave Trump the mandate to deport illegal immigrants. Trump campaigned on border security and promised to conduct the largest mass deportations in history, making illegal immigration a losing issue for Democrats.

“Americans overwhelmingly voted for it. And it’s not particularly a controversial matter,” Jennings set the record straight.

“And that’s what the administration clearly communicated to the American people in the election.”

“They overwhelmingly voted for it. And it’s not particularly a controversial matter.”

He also schooled the leftie on the differences between illegal immigrants and legal citizens, which Democrats attempt to blur to push their false narrative.

“You’re conflating legal American citizens with people who came here illegally. We do this all the time in these debates.”

“I think what the administration is trying to do is be as aggressive as possible at deporting different kinds of populations. 

“One, people who’ve committed heinous, violent crimes. Number two, people that were violent before they came here.”

According to a recent Pew Research Center study, an overwhelming majority (97%) of Americans support deporting violent illegal immigrants. Two-thirds of Americans, including half of Democrats, also support deporting all illegal immigrants in the country.

“Number three, anyone who came here illegally, I mean, look, I’m sorry, but if you came here illegally, no matter how well-intentioned you were, there’s probably a decent chance you’re going to be sent back,” Jennings continued.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt had schooled journalists that anybody who entered the country illegally was a criminal and subject to deportation because the Trump administration was focused on enforcing all laws, including immigration laws.

“And if you are an individual, a foreign national, who illegally enters the United States of America, you are, by definition, a criminal,” she stated.

However, the Trump administration started by deporting the most violent criminals, whom the Democrats characterized as innocent undocumented individuals looking for better opportunities, such as crop pickers. 

Liberal judge James Boasberg even ordered the Trump administration to return Tren de Aragua gang members into the country, against the wishes of most Americans. However, the Supreme Court blocked the restraining order given by the liberal judge, whose articles of impeachment were filed in the Senate. 

Democrats also overwhelmingly voted against the Laken Riley Act, which aims to protect Americans’ lives by detaining illegal immigrants who are arrested, charged, or convicted for various crimes, such as burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting, to prevent them from being released on the streets and committing even more grievous crimes. 

The law was inspired by Laken Riley, a nursing student who was murdered by a violent illegal immigrant, arrested for various crimes, and released due to lack of similar laws allowing the detention of illegal immigrants undergoing prosecution.

Despite Americans clearly stating that they want to secure their country, Democrats are undoubtedly siding with criminals instead of Americans who elected them.

Uncategorized

F-16 Fighter Jets Scrambled Over Mar-a-Lago After Planes Violate Trump Airspace

/

Three civilian aircraft violated restricted airspace over Palm Beach, Florida, near President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, prompting North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) to scramble F-16 fighter jets, according to Newsmax host Todd Starnes.

The incidents occurred at 11:05 a.m., 12:10 p.m., and 12:50 p.m., based on Starnes’ reporting.

During two of the interceptions, the fighter jets deployed flares as part of their protocol to warn and direct the civilian aircraft. All three planes were escorted safely out of the restricted airspace.

Read more articles like this at LifeZette


Subscribe Form

© 2025 WokeSpy All Rights Reserved

Scroll to Top