Uncategorized

Uncategorized

TDS Suffering Leftists Plan to “Withhold Spending” to Hurt Trump’s Economy

/

It appears leftists would rather see their fellow Americans suffer financially than allow the economy to recover under Donald Trump’s presidency. Add this to the long list of Trump derangement Syndrome symptoms.

Some deranged liberals are now stocking up on supplies in order to spend as little money as possible during Trump’s second term.

The plan to withhold cash is part of a larger effort to keep Trump’s economy stagnant. You heard that right – the people who backed a presidential campaign that blew $1.5 billion are now preaching frugality.

This really shows you who these people really are.

Leftists are literally willing to prevent families from putting food on the table in order to hurt Trump.

“Trump will not have a good economy because we don’t have to let him,” one leftist wrote on X. “I myself plan on paying my bills and saving every penny beyond that.”

Another wrote: “I will not contribute to this economy in any other way,” adding “before he takes office and make sure I have everything I need for the next four years.”

Others are jumping on board, such as influencer “Brooklyn Dad,” who was caught taking $57,000 from a pro-Biden PAC in 2021. 

“Not buying extra shit will help sink his economy too. It won’t be hard, since everything will be 300% more expensive,” another states.

“Save that money. PASS IT ON.”

TDS sufferers will be left living in their own communist bubble while the rest of the country enjoys the new golden age under Trump.

Meanwhile, search giant Google is planning to host a social event with Democratic super PAC Priorities USA for raging liberals who declared they will “resist the Republican agenda.”

The tech giant will host a happy hour for Priorities USA, a leading Democratic super PAC, following Kamala Harris’s devastating loss to Donald Trump.

An invitation obtained by the Washington Free Beacon revealed that Priorities USA will first hold a “digital retrospective” to discuss the role of online campaigning in the 2024 election cycle.

A Google spokesman confirmed that the company will host the happy hour for Priorities USA

The spokesman stated:

“We did not participate in creating the content of the meeting. As they do for large ad buyers on both sides of the aisle, our political sales team will host some drinks after it.”

Read More at the Daily Fetched

Uncategorized

Michigan Democrats Want to Hike Business Taxes a Whopping 66% to Give Teachers $20,000 Raises

/

A pro-teacher, pro-union lawmaker wants to raise the state’s 6% corporate income tax to 10% to spend billions more on public schools while slashing corporate subsidies. The proposal, which would raise the tax by 66%, aims to use the additional corporate income tax revenue to make “historic investments” in public schools. According to the bill’s author, Democrat Rep. Dylan Wegela, the extra money could give teachers an estimated $20,000-a-year raise.

Wegela’s plan would raise the corporate income tax to 10% while also doing away with “corporate handouts through the Strategic Outreach and Attraction Reserve Fund (SOAR) fund.” The legislation earmarks the first $1.2 billion of corporate tax revenue to the General Fund. The next $50 million would still go to the Housing Fund. Everything else would go to the School Aid Fund. Wegela wants to eliminate $500 million for SOAR and direct more than $2.4 billion to the School Aid Fund.

The proposal amounts to a 67% increase in the CIT, according to Michigan Chamber of Commerce spokesperson Sara Wurfel as reported by MIRS. Meanwhile, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer signed a $23 billion budget bill into law this summer.

Read the Full Story at The Midwesterner

Uncategorized

Several “Fake News” Media Outlets Could Face Bankruptcy During Trump’s Presidency

/

President-elect Donald Trump has filed a groundbreaking $10 billion lawsuit against several prominent media organizations, including The New York Times and CBS, alleging defamation and intentional dissemination of false information during the 2024 presidential election.

The lawsuit, revealed late Friday, has sparked intense debate across political and media circles.

According to a statement from Trump’s legal team, the lawsuit accuses the media outlets of publishing and broadcasting “knowingly false and defamatory statements” designed to harm Trump’s re-election campaign and tarnish his reputation.

The complaint further claims that these actions represented a coordinated effort to mislead voters and influence the election outcome.

The lawsuit seeks $10 billion in damages, a figure that, if awarded, would represent one of the largest defamation claims in U.S. legal history.

Trump’s legal team asserts that the media’s alleged misconduct caused irreparable harm to the President-elect’s standing and undermined the integrity of the electoral process.

The lawsuit explicitly names The New York Times and CBS as defendants, with Trump’s legal team indicating that additional media organizations could be added as the case progresses.

Sources close to Trump’s legal team suggest that internal communications, whistleblower testimonies, and other evidence have been gathered to substantiate the claims.

Legal and media experts are closely watching the case, which is expected to test the boundaries of First Amendment protections and defamation law.

Throughout his political career, Trump has maintained a contentious relationship with the press, frequently labeling critical coverage as “fake news.”

However, this lawsuit marks a significant escalation, transforming his long-standing grievances into a high-stakes legal confrontation.

Legal analysts note that defamation cases involving public figures are particularly challenging due to the high standard of proof required.

Trump’s legal team will need to demonstrate that the media outlets acted with “actual malice” by knowingly publishing false information or showing reckless disregard for the truth.

Trump’s supporters have embraced the lawsuit as a necessary move to hold the media accountable.

Read More at RVM News

Uncategorized

Justin Trudeau Finally Admits Mass Immigration Was a “Mistake”

/

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is scrambling to mitigate his plummeting approval in the polls by acknowledging that he made “mistakes” regarding his country’s wake mass immigration policy.

Trudeau claimed that large corporations and colleges exploited Canada’s temporary foreign worker (TFW) program to avoid hiring Canadian workers and charged students outrageous sums of money for degrees.

“Far too many colleges and universities used international students to raise their bottom line — because they could charge these students tens of thousands of dollars more for the same degree,” Trudeau explained. “And, then there are really bad actors who outright exploit people, who target vulnerable immigrants with promises of jobs, diplomas, and easy pathways to citizenship. Promises that would never come true.”

Trudeau added that “when the post-pandemic boom cooled and businesses no longer needed the additional labor help” the Canadian government could have “turned off the taps faster.”

As a result of Trudeau’s failure, Canadians have faced a decrease in their wages and wealth.

Canadians now struggle with increased housing prices, productivity, and birth rates.

An Ipsos poll found that 33 percent of Canadians approved Trudeau’s job performance, while 67 percent disapproved.

Trudeau now says he plans to cut Canada’s legal immigration by 20 percent. “Canada’s new immigration plan is straightforward,” Trudeau continued.

“Lower the number of new immigrants coming into Canada — both temporary and permanent. We’re prioritizing permanent residents with the skills we need, like healthcare workers for our hospitals and construction workers who will build more homes.”

Trudeau’s apparent 180 on pro-immigration policies came after Canadian Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre vowed to cut the flood of migrants into Canada.

Poilievre said that immigration levels in Canada should be based on employers’ needs and the number of homes being built.

Meanwhile, the leader of the People’s Party in Canada, Maxime Bernier, argued that “mass immigration” has brought “more poverty” into the country.

Bernier criticized Trudeau for smearing people who had “raised the alarm” on millions of foreigners coming into Canada as being racist.

“This clown finally recognized he f***ed up by allowing millions of foreigners to invade our country,” Bernier wrote on X.

“He smeared those of us who raised the alarm as racists until just a few months ago. And now we should believe him when he says he can fix what he broke?? What a joke.”

Read More at the Daily Fetched

Uncategorized

AOC Offers Bizarre Excuse for Scrubbing Pronouns From Social Media Profile, And It’s Not Adding Up

/

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York deleted her preferred pronouns from her profile following President-elect Donald Trump’s election victory, and now she’s denying the decision was motivated by politics.

The popular Libs of TikTok account was the first to point out the change, posting a screenshot of her account of AOC’s account with the “she/her” designation and a later screenshot without them.

Some interpreted Ocasio-Cortez’s removal of her pronouns to be pulling back from supporting the extremist LGBTQ+ agenda.

Riley Gaines wrote on X: “They’ll pretend they never embraced (or even celebrated) the insanity. Don’t forget who the compliant, virtue-signaling sheep were.”

Days later, she denied the allegations in a post on social media and offered a bizarre explanation.

“The whole ‘story’ of removing pronouns after the election is fake,” AOC wrote.

“It happened a long time ago after the SCOTUS Twitter ruling meant I had to add the ‘personal acct’ disclosure. There weren’t enough chars so I had to swap the end. You can run the timeline to see for yourself,” she added.

What she means is that she had to disclose that her X account with the handle “AOC” is different from her Representative account, which has the handle @RepAOC.

But this makes no sense, as the RepAOC account also doesn’t have pronouns listed, and her bio reads “This account is maintained by federal staff to share services and legislation relevant to constituents of NY-14.” This is far fewer words than the maximum allowed for a bio on X, meaning she could fit pronouns on that account.

Similarly, she could’ve continued keeping the pronouns on her personal account simply by shortening her bio. She only needs to remove seven letters from her bio to fit pronouns – and it’s not a tough bio to shorten. 

Many on the left accused Ocasio-Cortez of slowly moving away from wokeism and trying to join the party’s centrist establishment to retain her influence.

We really couldn’t blame her. In a few years, her entire X profile could be used as an historic artefact to show how deeply embedded those on the left where to an absurd ideology.

AOC likely knows this, and she’s quietly getting ahead before her political career ends up in ruins.

We’ll soon find out.

Read More at the Daily Fetched

Uncategorized

Michigan Democrats Look to Remove Competence Exam Requirement to Become a Social Worker

/

Proposed legislation sponsored by Democratic House legislators seeks to remove the competence examination requirement to become a licensed social worker. If passed, Michigan House Bills 5184 and 5185 would amend the Public Health Code to eliminate the exam requirement for social workers at all license levels. Both bills were passed Thursday by the House Subcommittee on Behavioral Health.

Opponents say such a drastic change would place Michigan outside the standards observed by nearly every other state in the nation. Michigan officially passed the social work licensing law in 2004, becoming the 50th, and final, state to create a path to licensure. “Sacrificing standards and quality to increase quantity is not what vulnerable individuals in Michigan need or deserve,” according to the authors of Protect Public Health and Safety in Michigan: Reject The Social Work Licensure Modernization Act. “These ‘problematic barriers’ are safeguards and controls to decrease the likelihood of doing harm or re-traumatizing individuals, and to promote public health and safety.”

In order to become fully licensed, individuals with a degree in social work from an accredited university must take and pass a social work licensure exam. In Michigan, the Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs oversees the licensure and regulation of social workers. A critical part of the licensure process is the requirement to pass an objective, standardized exam. “Like other licensed professionals — doctors, nurses, lawyers, teachers or barbers — social workers must demonstrate knowledge and skills to ensure they can deliver quality services. Anything less puts the health and well-being of individuals, families and communities at risk.”

Read the Full Story at The Midwesterner

Uncategorized

Investigation Finds Harris Campaign Paid Oprah Twice as Much than Initially Reported

/

Vice President Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign spending was much more extravagant than initially reported. New details emerged that Oprah Winfrey was paid more than double the amount for her single town hall event.

Last week it was reported that Oprah’s production company, Harpo Productions, denied being paid a $1 million fee despite records from Federal Election Commission filings.

Oprah herself was also confronted by a reporter about the fee paid by the Harris campaign.

“Not true,” Oprah quipped when confronted by the reporter.

“I was paid nothing, ever.”

Watch:

However, not only was Oprah paid a fee, but it’s now reported to have been doubled.

According to the New York Times, Winfrey’s company was paid approximately $2.5 million for a single town hall event, far exceeding the $1 million figure.

Oprah defended the payment, arguing that the funds covered production costs, including “set design, lights, cameras, crew, producers and every other item necessary.”

However, his high-profile endorsements made little difference as Donald Trump took victory in a historic defeat against Harris.

As The Daily Mail reported, the campaign even allocated $900,000 for advertising space on Las Vegas’ Sphere in the final week of the election alone.

In October, the campaign also spent $2.6 million on private jet travel while touring battleground states.

The Harris campaign also spent $15,000 in food delivery services and $9,000 at premium ice cream establishments

The spending rates eventually left the Harris campaign in a $20 million debt despite having access to a $1.6 billion campaign budget.

In contrast to Harris’s costly approach, the Trump campaign used more cost-effective methods, gaining significant exposure through free podcast appearances.

Read More at The Daily Fetched

Uncategorized

Adam Schiff Fears Trump Will Use Military Against Him the Moment He Sets Foot in White House

/

Russian collusion hoaxer and serial liar Adam Schiff is worried that President-elect Donald Trump is planning to use the military against him after he is inaugurated in January next year.

Schiff was recently interviewed on CNN with Jake Tapper about Trump’s comments concerning the radical left.

“I think the bigger problem are the people from within,” Trump said recently. “We have some very bad people. We have some sick people, radical left lunatics, and I think they’re the and it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard or if really necessary, by the military because they can’t let that happen.”

Tapper asked Schiff of the comments; “Do you think that he was talking about using the military against you, and how concerned are you about retribution?”

Schiff replied: “Clearly, that’s what he was talking about. Would he go to that link with the military and essentially fulfill some kind of an unconstitutional order? I would hope the military would have more independence than that.”

“Historically, the military has stood up to civilian authority where civilian authority has suggested, as in his first administration, unconstitutional acts. Um, look, I’m not going to be intimidated by anything he says by anything he does. If I was, I wouldn’t be on your show,” he added.

“I’m going to do my responsibility in the Senate. Californians are expecting me, first and foremost, to try to work and get things done, work across the aisle where the president wants to fight prices,” Schiff continued.

“I will work with him. Where the president wants to engage in unconstitutional abuses of power, just as he did in the first administration, I will defend our state. I will defend the rights and freedom of the American people.”

“So, yeah, that’s what he said. That’s what he may try to do. But I’m not going to be intimidated.

Watch:

Read More at The Daily Fetched

Uncategorized

MSNBC’s Joy Reid Deletes Her X/Twitter Account Following Post-Election Meltdowns

/

MSNBC host Joy Reid announced her departure from X, formerly known as Twitter, by posting a video on social media in which she detailed her decision to delete her account.

Reid, who had 1.9 million followers on the platform, cited her lack of recent activity and ownership concerns as reasons for leaving the platform, which is now under Elon Musk’s control.

“Today, I finally did something I’ve been meaning to do for a while,” Reid stated, showing screenshots of the account deletion process. “The reason for doing it and kissing goodbye my 1.9 million followers over there is because I haven’t been posting for a long time. I just didn’t want to contribute content once it was purchased by its present owner.”

Reid went on to say that she had initially kept the account to prevent someone else from taking her username and “using it for nefarious purposes.”

Her exit from X sparked questions about potential future issues, given that she had previously faced controversy over past blog posts on her personal blog, which contained allegedly antisemitic and homophobic content.

At the time, Reid claimed her blog was hacked, an investigation that reportedly did not yield a definitive culprit.

The move to delete her account comes just days after former Fox News host Megyn Kelly speculated that MSNBC might consider letting Reid go.

In her podcast, Kelly stated that “MSNBC is allowing her [Reid] to spew this racist hate on their channel,” adding, “It’s a tick-tock situation until her a– is fired.”

Kelly’s remarks follow Reid’s recent controversial commentary, where she suggested that Black and Hispanic Trump voters were “identifying with whiteness” by supporting the former president.

Ratings for MSNBC have shown a notable decline since Trump’s victory in the recent presidential election.

Since Election Day, the network has experienced a 53% drop in prime-time viewership, while Fox News has reported a 21% increase in prime-time viewership.

Read More at LifeZette

Uncategorized

FEC Chairman Accuses DOJ Of Breaking Federal Policies With Letter To Elon Musk

/

Federal Election Commission (FEC) Chairman Sean Cooksey has publicly criticized the Department of Justice (DOJ), alleging that it violated federal policies by targeting Elon Musk’s pro-Trump political action committee (PAC) just weeks before the 2024 presidential election.

Cooksey accused the DOJ of attempting to “intimidate and chill private citizens and organizations from campaigning on behalf of President Trump” and urged DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz to launch an investigation into the matter.

In a letter sent Wednesday to Horowitz and the DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility, Cooksey expressed concerns over the DOJ’s actions, specifically a letter the department had issued to Musk’s political committee, America PAC.

The DOJ letter, first reported by The New York Times, warned that a $1 million giveaway Musk’s PAC offered to individuals signing a petition supporting constitutional freedom could potentially violate federal election laws.

Cooksey’s letter to Horowitz marks the FEC’s official response, and he argued that the DOJ’s actions were intended to sway the election outcome by targeting perceived political opponents.

Cooksey called on the DOJ to “hold accountable any individuals responsible for any violations of federal law or department policies.”

The FEC chairman also likened the DOJ’s warning letter to past politically charged actions, comparing it specifically to the Watergate scandal of 1972. “The underlying motivation behind this stunt is obvious,” Cooksey said. “Employees of President Biden’s Department of Justice wanted to stop an independent political committee from campaigning for President Trump in crucial swing states just prior to election day.”

The DOJ’s letter to Musk’s America PAC raised questions about whether the $1 million incentive could be seen as improperly influencing voter actions, despite Musk’s defense that participants were not required to register as Republicans or vote in the November 5 election.

Nevertheless, the DOJ’s letter quickly gained media attention, with some Democratic figures criticizing Musk’s actions as undermining democratic processes.

Cooksey also alleged that the DOJ’s Public Integrity Section had violated the department’s own policies by leaking the letter to The New York Times.

According to Cooksey, this move contravened established DOJ media guidelines, which discourage public disclosures regarding uncharged individuals or prejudicial information in ongoing matters. “Writing such a letter and then leaking it also violates the department’s long-standing policy against the identification of uncharged parties and the disclosure of prejudicial information,” Cooksey stated.

Cooksey’s comments reflect an ongoing tension between Musk and certain political and governmental figures. Musk, a longtime supporter of Democratic candidates, notably endorsed Trump after an assassination attempt on the president-elect in July.

Following the endorsement, Trump named Musk and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy to co-lead the newly created Department of Government Efficiency, part of Trump’s incoming administration.

President-elect Trump praised Musk and Ramaswamy, stating, “Together, these two wonderful Americans will pave the way for my Administration to dismantle Government Bureaucracy, slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure Federal Agencies – Essential to the ‘Save America’ Movement.”

The FEC’s criticism of the DOJ is expected to draw attention to questions about the department’s role in political processes and its handling of election-related activities.

With investigations potentially on the horizon, the episode underscores ongoing scrutiny over governmental transparency and accountability as the Trump administration prepares for its next term.

Read More at RVM News


Subscribe Form

© 2025 WokeSpy All Rights Reserved

Scroll to Top