Uncategorized

Russian collusion hoaxer and serial liar Adam Schiff is worried that President-elect Donald Trump is planning to use the military against him after he is inaugurated in January next year.

Schiff was recently interviewed on CNN with Jake Tapper about Trump’s comments concerning the radical left.

“I think the bigger problem are the people from within,” Trump said recently. “We have some very bad people. We have some sick people, radical left lunatics, and I think they’re the and it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard or if really necessary, by the military because they can’t let that happen.”

Tapper asked Schiff of the comments; “Do you think that he was talking about using the military against you, and how concerned are you about retribution?”

Schiff replied: “Clearly, that’s what he was talking about. Would he go to that link with the military and essentially fulfill some kind of an unconstitutional order? I would hope the military would have more independence than that.”

“Historically, the military has stood up to civilian authority where civilian authority has suggested, as in his first administration, unconstitutional acts. Um, look, I’m not going to be intimidated by anything he says by anything he does. If I was, I wouldn’t be on your show,” he added.

“I’m going to do my responsibility in the Senate. Californians are expecting me, first and foremost, to try to work and get things done, work across the aisle where the president wants to fight prices,” Schiff continued.

“I will work with him. Where the president wants to engage in unconstitutional abuses of power, just as he did in the first administration, I will defend our state. I will defend the rights and freedom of the American people.”

“So, yeah, that’s what he said. That’s what he may try to do. But I’m not going to be intimidated.

Watch:

Read More at The Daily Fetched

MSNBC host Joy Reid announced her departure from X, formerly known as Twitter, by posting a video on social media in which she detailed her decision to delete her account.

Reid, who had 1.9 million followers on the platform, cited her lack of recent activity and ownership concerns as reasons for leaving the platform, which is now under Elon Musk’s control.

Joy Reid has officially DELETED her account. pic.twitter.com/sk0nCsk2cm

— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) November 14, 2024

“Today, I finally did something I’ve been meaning to do for a while,” Reid stated, showing screenshots of the account deletion process. “The reason for doing it and kissing goodbye my 1.9 million followers over there is because I haven’t been posting for a long time. I just didn’t want to contribute content once it was purchased by its present owner.”

Reid went on to say that she had initially kept the account to prevent someone else from taking her username and “using it for nefarious purposes.”

Her exit from X sparked questions about potential future issues, given that she had previously faced controversy over past blog posts on her personal blog, which contained allegedly antisemitic and homophobic content.

At the time, Reid claimed her blog was hacked, an investigation that reportedly did not yield a definitive culprit.

The move to delete her account comes just days after former Fox News host Megyn Kelly speculated that MSNBC might consider letting Reid go.

In her podcast, Kelly stated that “MSNBC is allowing her [Reid] to spew this racist hate on their channel,” adding, “It’s a tick-tock situation until her a– is fired.”

Megyn Kelly thinks MSNBC will dump Joy Reid after she said Trump plans to deport minorities who have legal status in the country. https://t.co/MWvmqUj4Yo pic.twitter.com/mzVcDVqnQ8

— New York Post (@nypost) November 12, 2024

Kelly’s remarks follow Reid’s recent controversial commentary, where she suggested that Black and Hispanic Trump voters were “identifying with whiteness” by supporting the former president.

Ratings for MSNBC have shown a notable decline since Trump’s victory in the recent presidential election.

Since Election Day, the network has experienced a 53% drop in prime-time viewership, while Fox News has reported a 21% increase in prime-time viewership.

Don Lemon leaves X
Joy Reid leaves X
CCDH leaves X
The Guardian leaves X

The trash is taking itself out 👏

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) November 14, 2024

Read More at LifeZette

Federal Election Commission (FEC) Chairman Sean Cooksey has publicly criticized the Department of Justice (DOJ), alleging that it violated federal policies by targeting Elon Musk’s pro-Trump political action committee (PAC) just weeks before the 2024 presidential election.

NEW: I'm calling for an investigation into the Biden DOJ's illegal "warning letter" to intimidate @elonmusk and @America PAC, violating DOJ policy.

President Trump won, but that doesn't excuse DOJ's blatant attempts at election interference. The new admin must clean house! pic.twitter.com/l0SctOXTd1

— Sean Cooksey (@SeanJCooksey) November 13, 2024

Cooksey accused the DOJ of attempting to “intimidate and chill private citizens and organizations from campaigning on behalf of President Trump” and urged DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz to launch an investigation into the matter.

In a letter sent Wednesday to Horowitz and the DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility, Cooksey expressed concerns over the DOJ’s actions, specifically a letter the department had issued to Musk’s political committee, America PAC.

The DOJ letter, first reported by The New York Times, warned that a $1 million giveaway Musk’s PAC offered to individuals signing a petition supporting constitutional freedom could potentially violate federal election laws.

Cooksey’s letter to Horowitz marks the FEC’s official response, and he argued that the DOJ’s actions were intended to sway the election outcome by targeting perceived political opponents.

Cooksey called on the DOJ to “hold accountable any individuals responsible for any violations of federal law or department policies.”

The FEC chairman also likened the DOJ’s warning letter to past politically charged actions, comparing it specifically to the Watergate scandal of 1972. “The underlying motivation behind this stunt is obvious,” Cooksey said. “Employees of President Biden’s Department of Justice wanted to stop an independent political committee from campaigning for President Trump in crucial swing states just prior to election day.”

The DOJ’s letter to Musk’s America PAC raised questions about whether the $1 million incentive could be seen as improperly influencing voter actions, despite Musk’s defense that participants were not required to register as Republicans or vote in the November 5 election.

Nevertheless, the DOJ’s letter quickly gained media attention, with some Democratic figures criticizing Musk’s actions as undermining democratic processes.

Cooksey also alleged that the DOJ’s Public Integrity Section had violated the department’s own policies by leaking the letter to The New York Times.

According to Cooksey, this move contravened established DOJ media guidelines, which discourage public disclosures regarding uncharged individuals or prejudicial information in ongoing matters. “Writing such a letter and then leaking it also violates the department’s long-standing policy against the identification of uncharged parties and the disclosure of prejudicial information,” Cooksey stated.

Cooksey’s comments reflect an ongoing tension between Musk and certain political and governmental figures. Musk, a longtime supporter of Democratic candidates, notably endorsed Trump after an assassination attempt on the president-elect in July.

Following the endorsement, Trump named Musk and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy to co-lead the newly created Department of Government Efficiency, part of Trump’s incoming administration.

President-elect Trump praised Musk and Ramaswamy, stating, “Together, these two wonderful Americans will pave the way for my Administration to dismantle Government Bureaucracy, slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure Federal Agencies – Essential to the ‘Save America’ Movement.”

The FEC’s criticism of the DOJ is expected to draw attention to questions about the department’s role in political processes and its handling of election-related activities.

With investigations potentially on the horizon, the episode underscores ongoing scrutiny over governmental transparency and accountability as the Trump administration prepares for its next term.

Read More at RVM News

Saturday Night Live (SNL) star Chloe Fineman slammed Elon Musk in a since-deleted TikTok video, accusing the billionaire businessman of making her cry.

Fineman’s video came amid Musk’s criticism of the show in which he was parodied last week The skit saw Dana Carvey appear as the Tesla owner and supporter of Donald Trump – a clip which prompted Musk to say SNL had been “dying slowly.”

Dana Carvey makes unexpected SNL appearance as Elon Musk pic.twitter.com/Yx2G1GGc8F

— New York Post (@nypost) November 10, 2024

In response to Musk’s backlash, Fineman said she had seen “some news article about Elon Musk being butt hurt about ‘SNL’ and his impression” on the show. Referring to the X owner’s criticism, Fineman added, “I’m like, ‘You’re clearly watching the show. Like, what are you talking about?’”

Musk hosted the show in May 2021, and Fineman accused him of being the “awful” SNL host who made “multiple cast members cry”.

“And I’m like, you know what? I’m gonna come out and say at long last that I’m the cast member that he made cry. And he’s the host that made someone cry. Maybe there’s others,” Fineman continued. “But I’m like, no, if you’re gonna go on your platform and be rude, like, guess what? You made I, Chloe Fineman, burst into tears because I stayed up all night writing the sketch.”

"SNL" star Chloe Fineman has put Elon Musk on blast — saying he made her “burst into tears” when he hosted the show in May 2021. https://t.co/0lfF57wXjy pic.twitter.com/feLdTlu8Ah

— New York Post (@nypost) November 12, 2024

Musk was reportedly unimpressed with Fineman’s sketch at the time, although it would later make it to the airwaves.

Musk has since weighed in to state that he didn’t find any of the sketches he read funny.

Frankly, it was only on the Thursday before the Saturday that ANY of the sketches generated laughs. I was worried.

I was like damn my SNL appearance is going to be so fucking unfunny that it will make a crackhead sober!!

But then it worked out in the end 😮‍💨…

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 12, 2024

Needless to say, her attempts for sympathy were dismissed on social media.

She's a professional comedy writer who cries when someone doesn't think her jokes are funny? That's funny.

— Seth Dillon (@SethDillon) November 12, 2024

"I stayed up all night writing this skit."

Well, sounds like you should invest in a time-management course. Especially, since the product output was crap.

— Deebs (@DeebsFLA) November 12, 2024

Elon making a female comic cry by telling her she isn’t funny is the funniest thing I’ve ever read 😂😂😂 king.

— Savanah Hernandez (@sav_says_) November 12, 2024

Others said they had little time for Fineman’s complaints.

Who cares! She cried… oohhhh, scary Elon

— Widiwidi (@TxWidiwidi) November 12, 2024

"Elon made me cry 4 years ago" What a complete moron! Here's an idea. How about you act like a grown up?

— RFK Jr's brain worm 🪱 (@deadbrainworm) November 12, 2024

And Elon didn’t have any to offer her either.

Seriously 😐

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 12, 2024

George Clooney, the Oscar-winning actor who once dismissed Donald Trump’s chances at the presidency, now finds himself under fire from his own party’s supporters after Kamala Harris’ disappointing 2024 election defeat, as reported by Daily Fetched.

Clooney’s vocal support for alternatives to President Joe Biden, especially in a critical op-ed published in The New York Times, has stirred up a hornet’s nest among liberals, who are now pointing fingers his way for the recent loss.

At 63, Clooney has been a dedicated advocate for the Democratic Party, contributing both time and money. In fact, he helped raise a staggering $30 million for Biden’s re-election campaign, only to openly question Biden’s viability shortly after.

His call for new Democratic leadership just months before the election is now being widely blamed for sparking doubts within the party. An insider close to Clooney revealed, “George feels that the backlash he is getting for Kamala losing is not at all warranted. He thinks it’s completely unfair to try and make him a scapegoat for her loss.”

🚨🇺🇸GEORGE CLOONEY: F*CK POLITICS – I'M OUT

Clooney is reportedly stepping away from politics after feeling like the “scapegoat” for Kamala's loss to Trump.

Clooney, who initially raised a whopping $30 million for Biden, later penned a fiery op-ed urging the president to step… pic.twitter.com/wiPCljp0yZ

— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) November 9, 2024

Clooney’s recent struggles with the party have left him contemplating a step back from political involvement. According to the same source, he’s feeling “very disheartened,” particularly after investing so heavily in the party’s goals and witnessing the swift backlash after the election.

Speculation around Clooney’s op-ed further heightened when rumors suggested that former President Barack Obama might have ghostwritten or heavily influenced his words.

While Politico noted that Obama didn’t explicitly encourage Clooney to speak out, he reportedly did nothing to stop it, creating an air of suspicion around their partnership. But whether or not Obama was involved, the larger story is clear: Hollywood’s political clout is rapidly fading.

This incident has forced a spotlight on the effectiveness of celebrity endorsements. Even paying high-profile figures like Oprah Winfrey millions to endorse candidates seems increasingly futile when core policy issues—such as gun rights, free speech, and economic concerns—hold much greater sway over voters.

As Clooney prepares to pull back from his once-enthusiastic political role, he faces the reality that Hollywood’s sway over politics may not be as powerful as it once was.

Despite the millions spent and the famous faces brought forward, the loss of Harris in the 2024 race seems to have spotlighted a deeper disconnect between the entertainment industry’s values and the everyday concerns of American voters.

Read More at LifeZette

The Michigan Supreme Court expanded its liberal majority in 2024, with the help of massive cash infusions from billionaires including George Soros, dark money groups, and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson.

Dark money groups not required to disclose donors contributed more than $5 million to help elect incumbent Justice Kyra Harris Bolden and law professor Kimberly Ann Thomas to the state’s highest court, an amount that exceeds the total raised by all four candidates for the two seats by more than $1 million, Bridge Michigan reports. The donations included nearly $4.4 million through mid-October from a shady Massachusetts-based nonprofit called The Justice Project Action, the largest donor to Supreme Court candidates this year.

Those donations went to a Justice For All super PAC backing Bolden and Thomas that has spent nearly $10.7 million on Democratic nominees to the high court since 2020. In 2024, $5.25 million out of $7.9 million raised by Justice For All came from dark money groups, which also included the Michigan Civic Action Fund and the Strategic Victory Fund. Other funding included $1 million from former billionaire New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, and $560,000 from the George Soros funded super PAC State Victory Action, according to Bridge’s review of campaign finance records through mid-October.

Read the Full Story at The Midwesterner

Oprah Winfrey‘s production banner, Harpo Productions, has publicly denied that the Kamala Harris campaign paid the billionaire TV host a $1 Million fee despite records from Federal Election Commission filings showing otherwise.

A Harpo spokesperson told Variety, “The campaign paid for the production costs of ‘Unite for America,’ a live-streaming event that took place September 19 outside Detroit, Michigan.”

“Oprah Winfrey was at no point during the campaign paid a personal fee, nor did she receive a fee from Harpo,” the spokesperson added.

Oprah was also confronted by a reporter about the payments.

“Not true,” Oprah quipped when confronted by the reporter. “I was paid nothing, ever.”

The Oprah denies receiving $1 million from the Harris campaign to "endorse" Kamala Harris.

Campaign finance records show that her studio, Harpo Productions, was paid $1 million by the Harris campaign.

Oprah did *NOT* look happy about the 2024 election. pic.twitter.com/gXH9Y9SSA7

— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) November 12, 2024

A recent Washington Examiner article, titled “How Kamala Harris plowed through $1 billion,” cited federal findings showing that Harris’s campaign “paid more than $15 million” to companies for expenses related to “event production.”

FEC records—which we cited—show Oprah's production company Harpo was paid the money pic.twitter.com/1j49nNDRgh

— Gabe Kaminsky (@gekaminsky) November 11, 2024

$1 million from those expenses went to Oprah Winfrey’s Harpo Productions, the outlet reported.

Harpo Productions failed to disclose how much the Harris campaign paid for the production costs related to the a virtual town dubbed “Unite for America” which featured Meryl Streep, Chris Rock, Ben Stiller, Tracee Ellis Ross, and Julia Roberts.

Other celebrity endorsements include:

• Megan Thee Stallion: Paid $5 Million
• Beyoncé: Paid $10 million
• Lizzo: Paid $1 Million

After plowing millions into celebrity endorsements, the Harris campaign was left in $20 million in debt.

Read More at the Daily Fetched

Trump Derangement Syndrome sufferers are being offered a four-year residential cruise to avoid the next four years under the 47th President.

The Tour La Vie program, offered by Villa Vie Residences, gives rich liberals the chance to visit over 140 countries while avoiding the US so they don’t have to face political reality.

Mikael Petterson, the company’s chief executive officer, said, “We came up with this marketing campaign before we even knew who would win. Regardless of who would have won, you would have half of the population upset.”

“Quite frankly, we don’t have a political view one way or the other. We just wanted to give people who feel threatened to have a way to get out.”

However, escaping Trump doesn’t come cheap.

The Tour La Vie program starts at $40,000 per year, offering four different packages for raging leftists to escape:

• “Escape from Reality” for a year
• “Mid-term Selection” for two years
• “Everywhere but Home” for three years
• The full experience to “Skip Forward” at four years

The “Skip Forward” option costs $256,000 for single occupancy or $320,000 for two, according to the company’s website.

Meanwhile, the one-year cruise is significantly cheaper, at $80,000 for singles or $50,000 per person for more.

That first package could be the best option when TDS finally realize Donald Trump is fixing America, not destroying it.

The company has already reported a “huge uptick” in ticket inquiries and expects to sell out 

Travelers will still be able to cast their votes while on board for the midterms and presidential election in 2028, with mail sent to the corporate office and then to the ship.

“They didn’t want to talk to one another,” Petterson said.

“They wanted to stay away from one another. At the end of the day everyone there isn’t there to talk politics. They actually have similar lifestyles. There weren’t any sort of issues or anything.”

Petterson said the cruise attracts “distinct groups” from retirees to semi-retired and digital nomads.

“It’s really cool how the community, old and young are coming together,” Petterson said.

“I think the world cruising market is growing and growing and having the ability to completely disconnect from the world and still be connected with our internet and Wi-Fi and invite your friends on board,” Petterson said.

“It really helps your ability to really live this lifestyle and still stay connected with your friends and family.”

A second Trump term with thousands of raging TDS sufferers fleeing the country sounds good to me.

Read More at the Daily Fetched

CNN data analyst Harry Enten said President Donald Trump‘s massive gains with certain groups in the 2024 election were much worse than a knockout blow for Democrats.

While Democrats suffered meltdowns following their historic loss, Enten said they haven’t fully grasped how bad it was for them.

Enten broke down the numbers, showing how significant Trump’s victory was.

Enten explained how Trump made the greatest improvements over a previous presidential election performance from Republicans since 1992.

“When was the last time a party gained in so many different places?” he asked.

“You have to go all the way back to 1992 when Bill Clinton improved on Michael Dukakis’ performance in 49 states, plus the District of Columbia.”

Enten continued to marvel at Trump’s epic win.

“Donald Trump’s performance on Tuesday was the best for a Republican presidential candidate in exit poll history.”

“He literally goes all the way back through history and breaks history.”

According to Enten’s chart, Trump improved his party’s election performance in 49 states and Washington, D.C., over the 2020 election.

“You know, I think the breadth of the improvement that Donald Trump had – Holy Toledo!”

Earlier this week, CNNs Jake Tapper admitted Trump’s election victory was the “greatest comeback in history.”

“It is hard to think of a political comeback that is actually more significant than this one. I’m tempted to say Richard Nixon, but that really falls short of what Donald Trump has achieved.”

Read More at the Daily Fetched

Maxine Waters joined a growing number of Democrats attempting to blame “racism” on Kamala Harris‘s devastating defeat in the U.S. presidential election against Donald Trump.

Some have even gone as far as to blame sexism too!

For years, Waters has been dividing Americans with her race-baiting politics, with everything from inciting violence against Trump supporters to dividing America with her “white supremacy” narrative.

During an appearance on News Nation with Chris Cuomo, Waters was asked, “What lesson should your party have learned?”

Waters responded:  “The Democratic Party worked very hard; they raised a substantial sum of money, and we had great candidates.”

“Trump had a following generally led by white males. White males voted in big numbers.”

“He had a few from the other race groups that joined, like the Latinos at 45 percent, and black men at about the same rate that they did when they voted for him before at about 20 percent, and that combination won.”

“It’s not that Democrats did not work hard and did not do a great job. We had an unusual situation where we had a black woman, which this country has never seen before.”

“A combination of all these things led to his [Trump’s] win.”

Chris Cuomo responded: “I will not push back on the idea that race and sex matter in America and politics; I think they do.”

“I don’t know if that is the controlling variable, and you don’t suggest otherwise. To me, it seems to be that the Democrats thought ‘Trump stinks’ is enough.”

“Senator Bernie Sanders said something that reminded me of you: The Democratic Party used to be, ‘We are all about doing for working people; that’s what we do.’

“You are now seen as not that, even by Bernie Sanders.”

Read More at the Daily Fetched