News

When it comes to the money the government is siphoning off you through income taxes, most of it is literally going up in smoke.

The most recent Treasury data showed that as the federal government surpasses a record $35 trillion national debt, $1.1 trillion will be spent on interest payments alone this fiscal year. 

According to reports: “Interest payments on the federal debt now account for 76% of all personal income taxes collected. This means that for every dollar Americans pay in income tax, about 76 cents go towards paying interest on the national debt.“

Roughly 45%, or nearly half of the federal government’s revenue is from personal income taxes. 

The “76%” statistic is from the latest data from June, which showed that the U.S. government spent $140 billion on interest for Treasury debt securities and collected $185 billion in individual income taxes the same month.

At the turn of 21st century, the national government debt was $5.77 trillion, and by 2010 it had more than doubled to $12.77 trillion. The debt reached $23.22 trillion at the beginning of 2020. And only a few years later on Biden’s watch, it now surpasses $35 trillion.

At this rate, we’ll eventually reach a point where we don’t even bring in enough income tax to cover the interest payments on the debt – also known as bankruptcy.

In the last fiscal year of the Trump presidency, annual interest on the debt were at $521 billion, which was $44 billion (15%) higher than the $454 billion the government was spending the year before he took office. By contrast the government’s annual interest expense under Biden increased by a whopping $619 billion from what he inherited, a 114% increase. 

Phrased differently: Biden screwed up America’s finances so badly that the federal government’s annual interest expense under Trump was closer to zero than it is to Biden’s.

Click on the video below to watch 38 seconds of an apparently legless person with a sing-song and manic affect tell you all about the latest uglification of what’s being called the “progress pride flag.” We’re going to assume that this is a man, but nothing is certain these days. 

In case you don’t want to subject yourself to that much leftie audio, Wokespy will break it down for you!

This is the original gay pride flag. It was never known as the “LGBT” flag until recently. 

Around 2015, a new set of deviants calling themselves “trans” and “queer” somehow climbed to the top of the privilege hierarchy among sexual minorities, displacing plain old-fashioned gay people with those who claimed to have different “genders.” “Abimegender,” for example, is a “gender” that is “profound, deep, and infinite.”

And that’s when the rainbow clown crew started jam-packing the old flag with all sorts of clashing colors and aesthetically baffling symbols to depict the alleged existence of ever-weirder micro-categories of sexuality. 

Our friend in the video above gives us a brief tour. After introducing the “classic” rainbow flag, he points out that the black and brown bands are to “represent people of color,” who, presumably, were not represented by the literal rainbow. Or something. The baby pink and blue stripes are there for “trans folx,” a yellow triangle for “intersex folx,” and the two feathers in what looks like a donut stand for “indigenous folks that identify as two-spirit.”

On that last one: For a group of people who say they’re concerned about being inclusive, it seems strange to represent American Indians with feathers, considering that only some tribes used them in headdresses. And that whole “two-spirit” thing? It’s not some ancient tribal tradition. The idea was coined at some gay and lesbian conference in 1990. 

Social media users are reacting as you would expect them to. 

Well, Natalia, neither can they!

User Fahrenheit533 simplifies the taxonomy for us:

There’s always at least one who says something that’s funny because it’s unkind but true:

What’s your favorite neo-gender? Tell us in the comments!

Is there anything that “trans” has not contaminated? From movies to television to school curricula to (mostly female) church preachers to children’s programming, it’s all trans, all the time. Time was it was considered, well, weird to be a grown man in makeup and girlie clothes. Now the transvestites of yesterday’s daytime talk shows, presented as the studies in human oddity that they were, are pushed in our faces as “real women.”

But wait-there’s more! Wildly popular Youtube video maker “Mr. Beast,” known for elaborate video pranks and philanthropic give-aways, has a trans sidekick. MrBeast, whose real name is Jimmy Donaldson, boasts a relatively young audience base of over 300 million subscribers on YouTube, and is known for his elaborate and often philanthropic videos. He’s gained widespread recognition for his attention-grabbing stunts, large-scale challenges, and generous donations, often giving away large sums of money, cars, and even houses to strangers and fans.

This has been known for a while since viewers started noticing that co-host Chris Tyson had started to look and act a little more effeminate.

Well now Chris, who abandoned his wife and child, is “Kris”, and “she” is telling everyone that female hormones “saved” “her” life. 

“I am a woman! She/her. I’ve never said that publicly, but I’ve been fully confident in that decision for over a year now,” he said in a recent interview.

But wait—there’s even more! Kris Tyson isn’t just any trans woman; it appears Tyson may be interested in children for reasons other than paternal. The campaign group Gays Against Groomers, made up of homosexuals fighting against the encroachment of child abusers and pedophiles into what used to be simply called the “gay community” has this:

The trans community, amazingly, was more concerned with his bad it made them look, rather than express any concern for the minors involved.

Now, these are all still just allegations, but talk around Chris Tyson’s sexual interests potentially veering into the “inappropriately aged” category has been going on for some time. This video makes additional allegations:

Social media users seem unsurprised at the accusations, and why shouldn’t they be? We’ve been screamed at for years that “trans women” are real women, normal in every way, even when these lady men are caught perving in women’s bathrooms and worse. 

Some parents caught on earlier (maybe it was the suspicious use of the “trans colors” of baby pink and baby blue on the wrappers for Mr. Beast snack bars. 

Normal people are tired of being quiet and told they’re bigots for noticing depravity and saying “no thanks.”

More is sure to come out over time. What do you think about all this? Tell us in the comments!

I’m Joshua Slocum with a Wokespy One-Shot:

Republican House Rep. Tim Burchett criticized the head of the Secret Service, Kimberly Cheatle, in the aftermath of the attempted assassination on Donald Trump, branding her a “diversity hire” 

Amid heavy criticism of the agency’s handling of security at Trump’s now infamous rally in Butler, PA, on Saturday, July 13. People are asking how shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks was able to get on an open rooftop around 400-500 feet away from the former president’s stage.

Then we have footage of a female Secret Service agent failing to holster her gun. Along with her inability to shield the 6’ 3” Trump, the Secret Service is under the microscope.

The agency aims to increase the number of female staff to 30% by 2030, while director Cheatle – formerly senior director of global security at PepsiCo – has previously called for more “diverse candidates” to join the agency.

Speaking to Fox News, Rep. Burchett blamed DEI initiatives for the failings at the Trump rally.

“Somebody really dropped the ball. You’ve got a DEI person, a DEI initiative person who heads up our Secret Service,” said Burchett. “You know she was working at Pepsi before this. I know she was a former CIA Secret Service agent, but still, this is what happens when you don’t put the best players in.”

Many on social media were in agreement with Burchett’s remarks about the dangers of DEI hiring.

Others speculated as to whether Cheatle would remain in post should Trump win the presidential election in November.

And that’s you up to date. If you liked this, try my weekly show. Disaffected streams Sundays at 9 eastern on X, Rumble, and Youtube. See you next week!

DON’T MISS THE DISAFFECTED PODCAST
Twitter: https://x.com/DisaffectedPod
Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/disaffected/id1549604908
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/disaffectedpodcast
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2z9xmIbmeQNILQh5NSGnOc
PodBean: https://disaffected.podbean.com/