Election

Election, Main Story

Tim Walz Throws Kamala Harris Under the Bus Over Election Loss

Image Credit: © Jovanny Hernandez / Milwaukee Journal Sentinel / USA TODAY NETWORK

    Months after a disastrous election cycle for Democrats, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D-MN) is acknowledging the failures of the Harris-Walz campaign, particularly in its media strategy and voter outreach.

    In an interview with Politico, Walz admitted that the campaign took a cautious approach, avoiding media engagements and missing opportunities to connect with voters.

    Walz pointed to the limited time the campaign had following Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the race four months before the election, but suggested that they should have taken a more aggressive approach rather than limiting media appearances.

    President Joe Biden during the debate at CNN’s studios in Atlanta. CNN Anchors Jake Tapper and Dana Bash are moderators of the debate.

    “We shouldn’t have been playing this thing so safe,” Walz told Politico.

    “I think we probably should have just rolled the dice and done the town halls, where [voters] may say, ‘You’re full of sh*t, I don’t believe in you.’ I think there could have been more of that.”

    The Harris campaign’s media strategy, Walz suggested, reflected a broader pattern among Democrats, who have been reluctant to engage with the press.

    He said that instead of playing it safe, the campaign should have recognized that they were never truly ahead in the race.

    “In football parlance, we were in a prevent defense to not lose when we never had anything to lose because I don’t think we were ever ahead,” Walz said.

    While some former Harris aides agreed with Walz’s assessment, arguing that the campaign “put him in a box” and did not effectively use him as a candidate, others disagreed.

    Some staffers pointed to his struggles during media appearances, particularly in the vice presidential debate against now-Vice President JD Vance.

    One former Harris staffer described Walz’s debate performance as a major liability, citing his difficulty answering questions, particularly on his past travel to China.

    “This was a guy who definitely was embarrassed by his flubs, didn’t handle them well, and seemed like there was a never-ending supply of them, so that was part of the issue of getting him out there everywhere,” the former staffer said.

    “I don’t look back on that campaign and think that the way we used Walz was a critical error.”

    Leading up to the vice presidential debate, Walz reportedly struggled with confidence, with campaign insiders describing him as “in his own head,” “super nervous,” and concerned about letting down the ticket.

    His uneven debate performance was widely criticized and raised questions about his ability to handle high-pressure moments on the national stage.

    Despite the 2024 defeat, Walz is now considering a presidential run in 2028. When asked about the possibility, he told Politico that he is “not saying no” and remains open to future opportunities.

    “I’m staying on the playing field to try and help because we have to win. And I will always say this, I will do everything in my power, and as I said, with the vice presidency, if that was me, then I’ll do the job,” Walz said.

    With Democrats struggling to rebuild after their 2024 election losses, Walz’s reflections signal a broader conversation within the party about what went wrong and how to restructure future campaigns.

    Whether Walz emerges as a serious contender in 2028 remains to be seen, but his recent remarks suggest he is positioning himself for a role in the party’s future.

    Visit RVM News for more articles like this.

    Democrats, Election

    Bill Maher: Democrats Will “Lose Every Election” if They Keep Doing This

    Bill Maher is cautioning Democrats that forcing government control over parental rights in transgender matters will result in electoral disaster for the party.

    Speaking on the Pod Save America podcast, Maher told former Obama speechwriter Jon Lovett that Democrats risk losing every election if they continue pushing policies that undermine parental authority.

    “You want to lose every election? Just keep coming down on the side of parents coming in second in a ‘Who gets to decide what goes on with my kid’ contest,” Maher said.

    Maher’s remarks came in response to Lovett’s argument that parents should only have a say in their child’s transgender-related decisions if they fully support their child’s identity.

    Lovett implied that parents who do not affirm their child’s transgender identity are comparable to abusive parents who endanger their children.

    “I don’t want Donald Trump deciding [child trans-related issues], I want parents and doctors—” Lovett began before Maher cut in.

    “Well, you just said parents can get shut out,” Maher responded.

    Lovett attempted to clarify his stance, saying, “I don’t think parents should get shut out. There are rare exceptions to that… but we also recognize that some parents do such a bad f**king job, that the kids are in danger.”

    He continued, “That happens outside of trans issues, that happens all the time. Some parents are f**king terrible.”

    Lovett went on to claim that the reality of “terrible parents” is often ignored in discussions about transgender policies. He insisted, “Do I think that schools should, as a baseline, be keeping a secret from parents? Of-f**king-course not. No one thinks that.”

    Maher pushed back, stating, “Apparently that’s not true. People do think that.”

    During the discussion, Lovett compared regrettable transgender surgeries to botched heart surgeries, suggesting that mistakes in the medical field do not justify banning a particular treatment.

    “There are also really important surgeries that people get for their heart, and they go wrong, and somebody dies. And nobody says, ‘We must stop the cardiologists.’ No one says, ‘We must stop the surgeons,’” Lovett said.

    A skeptical Maher responded, “Wow. That’s your analogy?”

    Lovett continued, “We don’t get rid of the specific surgery. We don’t throw out a whole field of medicine. We say, ‘Let’s make sure we’re doing it in a way that’s healthy.’”

    He defended so-called gender-affirming care, stating, “The science, the research, makes clear that, yes, there are exceptions. Yes, there are people practicing it in ways that maybe go too far, but for the most part, study after study shows that gender-affirming care saves a lot of lives.”

    He also dismissed concerns over transgender procedures as “edge cases.”

    Maher then referenced a major story published by The New York Times, which revealed that a ten-year study on transgender medical interventions was deliberately withheld because the findings did not support the preferred narrative.

    “So in other words, it came out not the way you wanted the study to come out — not what you said, that, ‘Oh, all the studies show’ — no,” Maher said.

    He acknowledged that for some individuals, transgender medical treatments may be appropriate, but questioned the risks involved in performing irreversible procedures on minors.

    “Some people, yes, [trans surgeries] are the right thing,” Maher said.

    “But to take that risk at that age, before you know sh*t about anything — and again, this was a very long study, very thorough. And they wouldn’t release it, because it came out with the wrong conclusion.”

    Maher’s remarks highlight an ongoing political battle over parental rights and government involvement in transgender policies.

    As Democratic leaders continue pushing school and state-driven policies that limit parental oversight in these decisions, Maher’s warning suggests the party risks alienating voters who see these policies as overreach.

    With parental rights becoming a key issue ahead of the 2024 elections, Maher’s comments could reflect a broader concern among some Democrats that pushing too far could cost them at the ballot box.

    Read more articles like this at RVM News

    Election

    One State Could Decide America’s Entire Future In 2025 Should Voters Refuse To Act

    Wisconsin voters have the potential to decide the fate of all Americans in April, a situation finally getting some of the attention it deserves (but probably not enough).

    Voters in Wisconsin will head to the polls on April 1 to decide the ideological balance of the state’s Supreme Court, which could have a direct impact on every future presidential election. The “highly consequential” race will further dictate the future of issues such as life, religious freedom, as well as election integrity, and more.

    The current balance in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court is a 4-3 liberal majority after Justice Janet Protasiewicz won in 2023. Justice Ann Walsh Bradley is officially retiring her position, allowing for either an even balance or a significant liberal majority to dictate the future of Wisconsin’s legislation, according to Breitbart. 

    “It’s probably going to be just as competitive as the last couple of presidential and gubernatorial elections and Senate elections here,” said former Wisconsin Republican Gov. Scott Walker, according to NBC News. Though the race is supposed to be nonpartisan, Walked noted the situation is promised to “reach a level that much more like what you see in partisan elections.”

    Who Are The Candidates?

    Left-wing billionaires like George Soros, Silicon Valley’s Reid Hoffman, and more, are pouring millions into Dane County Circuit Court judge Susan Crawford. “I believe people in Wisconsin deserve to feel safe as they go about their lives…My top priority in making decisions is always to make our communities safer,” said Crawford of her policies, according to Ballotpedia. Other liberal judges have also endorsed Crawford’s campaign.

    The Milwaukee Police Association officially endorsed Waukesha County Circuit court judge Brad Schimel’s campaign. He says he’s running to “restore confidence in the people of Wisconsin that the justice system will be fair and impartial…I will be honest about my principles, but will never prejudge a case.” Support is rolling into both campaigns, including $1 million from a group with ties to technology billionaire Elon Musk, according to Politico.

    Why This Matters To People Outside Of Wisconsin

    “Wisconsin is the only state that was one of the closest three margins in the last three Presidential elections. It was critical in deciding who became president each of the last three elections.  The margins have been by less than 30,000 with over 3,000,000 votes cast,” Million Voices’ John Graves explains. “The four liberal justices overruled the three conservative justices after the liberal took over the court in 2023, and reversed the ruling on drop boxes and other critical election integrity rulings. That’s why it’s the most important state right now, and that’s why this election is so important.”

    The Wisconsin election isn’t just about what happens for state residents. The issues that matter most to you ultimately, as they trickle upwards from the local level, end up in the hands of those who run this nation. Wisconsin basically chooses the president every four years. Do you want policies related to noncitizen voting, ballot drop boxes, and more, to be part of Wisconsin’s electoral system?

    It is essential to tell your friends, family, pastor, anyone you know who may have ties to Wisconsin, to get out and vote in April. We’ll be bringing you the latest updates on the races, so be sure to share them with your kin.

    Read More at Million Voices

    Election

    Biden Gets Confused While Singing “Happy Birthday” to Kid He Invited on Stage

    Joe Biden became bewildered after inviting a young man to the stage before singing Happy Birthday to him, at which point he could not remember his name.

    During the song’s third verse, “Happy Birthday to -”, Biden apparently had trouble, seeming to forget the person’s name he was singing to.

    The President seemed to mumble through that part, hoping nobody would notice.

    “Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday to…,” Biden sang into the microphone.

    Watch – it’s pretty funny:

    The kid appeared to take the gaffe well, laughing it off as Biden’s voice trailed off at the part of the song he didn’t know.

    Read More at the Daily Fetched

    Election

    Cuomo Says He Felt Satisfaction Over Kamala’s Loss Due to Trump Shooting Reaction From the Left

    Chris Cuomo, host of The Chris Cuomo Project and NewsNation anchor, didn’t hold back on his criticism of left-wing reactions to the July assassination attempt against President-elect Donald Trump.

    During a recent episode of his show, Cuomo expressed both disgust and what he described as “satisfaction” over the political fallout Vice President Kamala Harris faced in November, attributing it to the left’s appalling response to Trump’s near-death experience, as reported by The Daily Caller.

    The incident occurred during a Trump rally in Butler Township, Pennsylvania, where a gunman fired at the President-elect, striking him in the ear.

    Despite the gravity of the situation—an assassination attempt on a U.S. leader—many left-leaning commentators minimized the attack. Some even claimed Trump was hit by teleprompter glass rather than a bullet.

    Cuomo didn’t mince words, directing his outrage at those who dismissed the seriousness of the attempt:

    “What I found completely appalling and outrageous was how unimpressed lefties were by Trump getting shot in the head and how many of you would say, ‘Will you stop saying he got shot in the head? It just nicked his ear.’ Once again, to my earlier point: fuck you. You get nicked in the ear by a bullet and tell me that it’s ‘No big deal. I’m good. I’m good.’ Nah, nah. That’s crazy.”

    Cuomo highlighted what he saw as hypocrisy, pointing out that if a similar attack had been made on Harris, the media and the left would have been consumed with outrage for days. He continued:

    “If that had happened to Harris, you guys would have talked about it for three days nonstop about how we’re in Helter Skelter mode or whatever it is. And then you go and call me a bigot for saying that. This is why you lost the election. That’s exactly why you lost the election.”

    The failed assassination attempt wasn’t without consequence. One attendee, former volunteer fire chief Corey Comperatore, was tragically killed. Two others, 57-year-old David Dutch and 74-year-old James Copenhaver, were injured.

    Yet, despite the tragedy, some on the left propagated conspiracy theories that the incident was staged. According to a Morning Consult poll, a third of President Joe Biden’s supporters entertained the possibility that the attempt wasn’t genuine.

    Cuomo didn’t stop there. He addressed a second assassination attempt on Trump in September, when a man armed with a semi-automatic rifle targeted the President-elect at Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach. Secret Service agents thwarted the attack before shots were fired.

    Cuomo revealed he personally reached out to Trump after the incident:

    “I reached out to Trump. I wanted to just say, ‘Listen, I’m really sorry that this is going on and it’s being dealt with this way.’ Not because I’m in favor of his politics or what he says—I criticize him all the time. That’s my job, and he deserves it. But he doesn’t deserve this.”

    While Cuomo’s politics often differ from Trump’s, his condemnation of the left’s reaction was clear: their callousness crossed a line, and it didn’t go unnoticed by voters.

    Read More at LifeZette

    Election

    MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace Suggests “Studying MAGA” to Defeat Movement

    MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace said that studying MAGA is important to expose “the movement’s vulnerability” and defeat it.

    Wallace said:  “I think the study of MAGA is essential to defeat MAGA. Right? And if you want to go to the country in four years with the political movement that defeats MAGA, you have to understand MAGA. And so to me this is a story that is, the personalities in conflict, you just can’t look away, right?”

    “But the idea that one figure, and I think it’s Bannon in this case, is trying to preserve something that to him as a MAGA enforcer is, I don’t even know the vocabulary to use, precious, you know, the anti-immigration view has to be pure.”

    She continued: “To be against these visas being offered is in direct conflict with Trump’s core promise, which is of a robust economy because what Musk represents is that American businesses feel like they can’t prosper and thrive without access to these visas.”

    “Again the study of MAGA to be able to defeat it is understanding where the weak links are this is clearly going to be one of them.”

    Wallace added: “It’s like two tarantulas in a bowl.”

    “There’s nobody to root for right because you’re watching this like ugly collision where Musk is arguing for his own bottom line, Bannon is arguing for sort of the ideologies at the root of MAGA’s sort of nativist underbelly.”

    “But what you have to study I think from the outside is what it exposes about the movement’s vulnerability.”

    Watch:

    Read More at the Daily Fetched

    Election

    Is Kamala Harris on Her Own Drunkapalooza Tour?

    You know how Aunt Cindy always shows up at the family Christmas dinner trying to pretend she’s not drunk when she is? Even when she promises she’s only going to have “a couple glasses” of wine? 

    Our favorite Vice President and failed presidential nominee looks like she’s thrown caution to the wind. It seems like Kamala Harris has decided, “Screw it; Imma drink what I want.” Is she actually intoxicated? No one can say for sure, but what do you make of this performance at a D.C. Christmas party? 

    Harris is well-known for being awkward and stiff; no one would accuse her of being able to think or speak quickly on her feet. In practically every professional or candid video you find her in, the woman is either repeating memorized script lines with robotic intonation, swapping out accents to suit the audience, or, well, looking and sounding drunk as hell. Remember this post-election video?

    As podcast host Megyn Kelly said, Harris sounds like every drunk girl at 2 a.m. who ties one on and leaves her friends “encouraging” girl-power voicemails she won’t remember in the morning. 

    This latest clip continues what appears to be Harris’ . . .what do you call it. . .new “look” or personality? Standing at a lectern at the dinner, Harris seems to be having trouble making her legs work. She bounces up and down and sways in a way that makes her look like she’s wearing polio braces on her shins. 

    She’s trying to make a funny about what to do when you’re invited to dinner at a friend’s who is not a very good cook. There are plenty of great jokes in the premise, but Harris just can’t pull them off. It probably doesn’t matter that she didn’t get any laughs since the woman adds her own laugh-track to every appearance. Yes, the famously jarring cackle made a Christmas appearance. 

    Let’s see what X/Twitter had to say about Benny Johnson’s find. 

    Oh, dear. 

    Party on, Kam-Kam:

    From this guy’s lips to God’s ear:

    Election

    Kamala Harris Didn’t Flip A Single County In The 2024 Presidential Election

    Kamala Harris failed to flip a single county in last month’s presidential election, data reveals.

    The sheer scale of Donald Trump’s overwhelming victory has been widely reported; the Republican won the popular vote for the first time in his political career, and the first time in 20 years for the GOP. He also swept every swing state, with his victory all-but confirmed just hours after polls had closed.

    On his path to victory, Trump boosted his support across the country in Republican and Democrat strongholds. On the contrary, Harris’ failure to boost support in any state – including those which she won – was highlighted by an instantly-viral CNN infographic.

    However, Harris’ dismal performance was further explained via graph showcasing a county-by-county breakdown of the U.S. The 54 counties gained by Trump compared to 2020 are showcased in pink on the below map, with the Republican making gains nationwide, from the battlegrounds to the Vice President’s home state of California, as well as Tim Walz’s home county. Harris, meanwhile, is marked in yellow, albeit noticeably absent from the nationwide map.

    This makes her the first presidential candidate to not flip a single country since 1932.

    Social media commentors added context to the scale of the defeat.

    Others were surprised by the comparative lack of movement in the Senate and the House of Representatives.

    Election, Ethics, Uncategorized

    DNC Union Launched A GoFundMe To Support Furious Laid Off Staffers

    The Democratic National Committee (DNC) union has launched a GoFundMe campaign to raise $25,000 for staffers laid off following significant election losses.

    As of now, the campaign has raised $16,000, but the union’s frustration with DNC leadership is evident, with many criticizing the lack of severance pay for the workers who dedicated hours to electing Democrats.

    Peter Doocy reported on “Fox & Friends” Monday morning, highlighting the union’s statements and their ongoing efforts to support the laid-off staffers. “The organizer of this DNC union GoFundMe says we are heartbroken to see our colleagues who dedicated countless hours to electing Democrats up and down the ballot depart under these circumstances, and we are furious with DNC leadership for failing to provide severance to those affected as they fundraise,” Doocy said.

    The union’s frustration stems from what they view as a lack of support from the DNC, both financially and emotionally, in the wake of the election losses.

    As Doocy pointed out, the campaign’s organizers are hopeful that additional funds will come from either the DNC or unemployment assistance, but that possibility remains uncertain.

    Steve Doocy raised a point of concern, questioning how the layoffs were handled considering the DNC’s recent election defeat. “Peter, got a quick question for you, given the fact that the Democrats had an epic loss in the race for that building behind you, the DNC union people didn’t see layoffs coming where they were going to get one day’s notice,” he asked.

    Peter Doocy responded, clarifying that the DNC union staff had not expected the layoffs to occur so suddenly and with minimal notice. “Doesn’t sound like it. No, and they are about $16,000 of a $25,000 goal. It doesn’t seem like there that people who donated a lot of money for months, even just 10, $15 at a time, on those recurring payments that you get the text messages about constantly in an election season,” Doocy explained.

    “It doesn’t seem like there’s much of an appetite for people to open their wallets again for that, or for the Harris campaign that now needs Tim Walz to go out and ask for help.”

    The DNC’s financial struggles may signal broader challenges within the party, as the union’s GoFundMe campaign remains relatively stagnant.

    The union’s reliance on donations from past supporters, many of whom donated during the election season, appears to be insufficient in meeting their immediate needs.

    Ainsley Earhardt joined the conversation, raising concerns about the number of people affected by the layoffs. “How many people were fired? I know it was two-thirds. Do we know the exact numbers? I feel like $25,000 to help people pay their rents and their bills is not that much if it’s hundreds of people,” Earhardt asked.

    Peter Doocy responded by explaining that the union sees the $25,000 goal as a temporary solution, noting that they are hopeful for further financial support either from the DNC or from unemployment assistance programs. “They’re saying that the $25,000 is temporary, because they still think they’re going to be able to get some kind of money out of DNC or some kind of employment unemployment assistance, and so it’s temporary,” Doocy said. “They had a protest at Union Station yesterday. It was pretty small.”

    The layoffs and the GoFundMe campaign are part of a larger narrative surrounding the Democratic Party’s struggle to regain footing after a difficult election cycle.

    As the DNC grapples with financial and organizational issues, questions are arising about how they plan to recover and what steps, if any, they will take to address the concerns of their laid-off staffers.

    In the broader political landscape, discussions surrounding President-elect Donald Trump’s appointments and the potential for new initiatives are gaining attention.

    As Doocy mentioned, “The Trump team is filling out their cabinet. The President-Elect is reportedly trying to place Kash Patel in a high-ranking DOJ or FBI job. And Elon Musk, who is hiring right now with Vivek Ramaswamy for the DOGE government waste project, is said to be on the lookout for an AI Czar.”

    Read More at RVM News

    Election

    Libs Eat Each Other Alive on Piers Morgan Cat Fight

    How much faith do you put in political polling? How closely do the results of important political elections match the predictions put out by pollsters and pundits? That’s what’s on a lot of voters’ minds as, once again, Donald Trump beat expectations and predictions, winning the presidency by a wider margin than polls predicted. 

    Al Jazeera notes that it appears that pollsters undercounted and under-weighted Trump support just as they seemed to have done in the 2016 presidential election. “Yet eventually, Trump cruised to a comfortable victory, defying most polls,” wrote Shola Lawal. One wonders if the personal liberal  bias found in academia is also present among professional pollsters. 

    That leftist tilt in media is beyond dispute. And in the more leftist outlets such as National Public Radio, the bias is so stark as to be laughable. At the cost of his job, NPR veteran editor Uri Berliner found that there was not a single registered Republican of the 87 reporters and editors in NPR’s D.C. offices. 

    Election prognosticator Allan Lichtman, a historian, got a lot of media attention this presidential cycle as he usually does. Lichtman, a liberal, has a system for predicting the results of elections based on what he calls 13 “keys” to the White House. While he has correctly predicted nine of the last 10 presidential elections, his record took a hit in 2024 when he confidently predicted a Kamala Harris victory.

    Leftist podcaster Cenk Uygur of the show The Young Turks castigated Lichtman during an appearance both of them made on Piers Morgan’s show “Uncensored.” During the heated exchange, Uygur told Lichtman his “keys were absurd,” and that he got it all wrong. Lichtmann reacted immediately, yelling that he was “not wrong!” and that he, Lichttman, had more support than Uygur from online fans. 

    From there, it devolved into a teen-girl cat fight, complete with pointing fingers and huffing and puffing. Collin Rugg has some fun with it on X/Twitter:

    So did Rugg’s followers:

    Yes, yes, Liberacrat, I do enjoy it. 

    https://x.com/Wall_St_Custo/status/1859019608835187084


    Scroll to Top