Crime Denial

crime, Crime Denial, LGBTQ+

15 Percent of Inmates in Fed Women’s Prison Are. . . Men

/

Maybe by this time in 2026, writers like me won’t have to write things that don’t make sense. Things like this: Did you know that despite transgender individuals making up only 0.3% of the population, 15 percent of women in U.S. federal prisons are men?

See what I mean? 

We jumped the shark all the way into orbit in about 2014 when Time Magazine declared it the year of the “transgender tipping point.” Using a photograph of the “trans woman” “Laverne” Cox in a waist-cincher, wig, and a coquette pose, Time assured us that transgender rights were “the next civil rights frontier.” 

Sympathy for what we all used to correctly call drag queens and transvestites went so high it broke every measurement scale. No longer could we acknowledge that none of these men in “working girl” couture were actually men. It wasn’t permitted to fail to refer to them as “she.” Doing anything–even having the wrong look on your face–that signaled that you didn’t believe they really were women would get you shrieked at by leftist lunatics (mainly actual women) and accused of “transphobia” and “violence.”

Well it’s 10 years later and the seeds we sowed have blossomed into exactly the rotten fruit conservatives told us they would, and that all of us could have seen if we weren’t so busy pretending reality isn’t real. Given the high percentage of “trans women” in prison who are sexual predators, it should come as no surprise that they’re raping their cellmates. This is just one story out of California, and it’s particularly gruesome; after being allegedly raped by a “lady man “trans woman” behind bars, the court is forcing the victim to refer to her alleged rapist as “she” and “her.”

Mainstream media, of course, are attacking Donald Trump for putting the kibosh on the sadistic practice of putting male criminals in women’s prisons. The UK’s Independent bleats that Trump is “gutting” parts of the Prison Rape Elimination Act. How is Trump doing that? By no longer allowing men in women’s prisons.

The media may still be playing opposite day, but users on Twitter/X are having none of it. Former New York Times writer Alex Berenson, who defected from the Gray Lady has the story:

Though there are a few people sniping at Alex for being a “bigot” for using the term “trannies,” most of the reactions are like this:

Crime Denial, Entertainment, Illegal Immigration

Stars and Leftists Melt Down Over Deportations, But Fans Don’t Care

/

Americans should expect that it’s going to take some time for leftists and Democrats to accept the reality of what they’ve lost. And they have lost everything; the White House, the Senate, the House, and the Supreme Court. They’ve also lost majority support in the public on almost every issue that obsesses them from “transgender” ideology to soft-on-crime policies to coddling and paying for millions of illegal immigrants. 

But you can tell that the leftist establishment doesn’t yet believe this is real. They’re trying the same histrionics and absurd accusations against conservative government officials that they’ve been using since they lost their minds over Donald Trump’s first term as President. 

The media establishment, for some reason no one has been able to figure out, seems to have no higher priority than wrapping its emotional arms around illegal aliens. We’ve seen the highest number of border jumpers in history under the Biden presidency, and somehow, dangerous young men from third world countries with no papers set Democrat hearts aflutter. 

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is flapping her Muppet gums about how the price of coffee is going to rise because President Trump issued an ultimatum to Columbia. A few days ago, the president of Colombia, Gustavo Petro, refused to allow two U.S. military planes filled with illegal Colombians from landing in the country. Apparently, he thought he had this option, but he didn’t. Over the weekend Trump threatened immediate tariffs against all Colombian imports, and the country folded like the cheap South American socialist dictatorship that it is. Not only are they “happily” taking back all their countrymen, but the president is sending his own plane to help. All while the price of coffee remains unaffected.

Enforcing boundaries with tough consequences works, but this is a new concept for leftists. ABC’s anchor Martha Raddatz sat down with “border czar” Tom Homan and spluttered in shock when he confirmed that, yes, Americans are going to see military planes deporting illegals every single day. She seemed genuinely disoriented at the very ordinary, standard practice of, well, deporting people who are here illegally. Homan was unflappable and refused to comfort her or tell her that the U.S. is going to be “nice” about the issue. Take a look. 

Hollywood stars are having similar difficulties adjusting to the new reality that looks more like normal than anything we’ve had for 10 years. Former Disney child star and recording artist Selena Gomez just learned a hard lesson about being a ridiculous child about protecting illegal aliens. The rich, young singer, who is herself an American, doesn’t see herself that way. In a tearful video full of what the young call “ugly crying,” Gomez whimpered and wiped her eyes over the pain of seeing “her people” treated this way. 

Her people? Does she really mean to say that illegal border jumpers and criminals are “her people?” Why are her fellow American citizens not “her people?” To her shock, Gomez’s fans hit back at her online histrionics so hard that she pulled down the video. 

Take a look at it here:

The responses on X/Twitter weren’t any kinder to Gomez than her own fans:

It looks like people are getting tired of the “turn on the tears and then film them for sympathy” act that’s become so common among celebrities and woke activists. 

With these kinds of theatrics, it’s impossible to tell how much of the emotion is genuine and how much of it is a complete put-on. But it does seem plausible that young starlets like Gomez really are so emotionally damaged that they’re actually moved to tears by things that make sense to the rest of us. There’s a reason the status of “child star” invokes images of exploitation and pushy stage parents for most people. Whether performers like Gomez can come back to reality is an open question. 

crime, Crime Denial

Don’t Believe Your Lying Eyes: FBI Says Crime Is Down

/

By now you’re probably used to being told that what you think you can see with your own eyes isn’t true. Instead, you should trust the experts.

Did you notice changes in your child’s behavior after vaccination? No, you didn’t. The experts say vaccines are totally completely 100 percent honest to goodness safe. 

Do you think you’re spending a lot more on groceries today than you were when Joe Biden took office in 2020? Well, you think wrong, and you can’t add up the dollars you’ve spent, because the experts say President Biden has inflation under control, and it’s only stupid MAGA right wingers that claim eggs were not always $5 a dozen. 

You might even be foolish enough to think you’ve noticed more violent and dangerous behavior, like robbery, shoplifting, or assault out on the streets. Once again, you would be wrong to trust data from your own senses, and even more wrong to believe any stories your friends and family tell about being accosted in what used to be safe neighborhoods. 

No, friends, you haven’t seen what you think you’ve seen. The experts say so. The biggest experts of all, the FBI, can confirm that not only are you not seeing what you think you see, but you’re even crazier than you knew. Violent crime is actually down, you dumb MAGA rabble rouser. See? The statistics say so. 

Mainstream media like NBC are nothing but helpmeets to the federal government now, parroting every fib and misdirection. This articles just repeats the FBI’s implausible claim that murder declined at the steepest rate in 20 years between 2022 and 2023. And you can trust NBC, because they put it in a headline:

Except crime is not down, as anyone with eyes can see. The Biden administration and all the agencies that work under it (allegedly–it might be the other way around) are just lying to us. And according to the Trump campaign, they’re doing it using some of the cheapest tricks in the book. 

The rate of violent crimes the campaign is reporting is significantly higher than what the FBI claims. Why would that be? Well, because reporting is voluntary on the part of cities and states, and the latest FBI crime stats have huge, gaping holes—there is no data from crime in New York City or Los Angeles. 

Besides, states like California that have gone soft on crime are simply not arresting or prosecuting as many crimes as are occurring. This allows them to point to sheer numbers and say “crime is down.” Gee, government work must be nice if you can get it. 

Let’s see what the public on X has to say. Some of them, of course, think the FBI is much more trustworthy than Trump. 

Others see it in the reverse. 

James might need a social media suspension for trusting his own stupid “anecdote” instead of a real expert who knows James’ life better than James does. 

We were just saying. . . 

crime, Crime Denial

Media Says Trump is Trying to Self-Assassinate

/

It’s hard enough to believe we live in a country where there have been not one, but two, attempts to assassinate a former president and current presidential candidate. What’s even harder to accept is how apparently. . . OK this is to a significant portion of the American population. 

On Sunday, September 15, a lunatic and apparent uber-progressive named Ryan Routh tried to kill President Trump in Florida by sticking an assault rifle through a fence and taking aim while Trump was at a golf course. Secret service agents spotted the man and fired at him. They did not hit Routh, and he tried to get away. Addressing the nation on the social media platform X on Monday, September 16, Trump thanked the civilian bystander who spotted Routh trying to make a get-away, and he also thanked the Secret Service for protecting him. 

“The civilian did a phenomenal job,” Trump said on X.  “How many people would have the brainpower to follow him to the back of his truck?”

As the news spread, you could see the mainstream media trying to decide whether to report, downplay it, or blame Trump for it. Many of them decided to blame Trump, naturally. It’s sick, but there’s a name for this: narcissistic reversal. This is when a self-centered, callous person or entity (remember, we’re talking about the media) reverses the truth. In this case, the leftist media is doing to Trump what they decry when they claim that women or minorities are not taken seriously: victim-blaming. 

NBC’s anchor Lester Holt can be seen dishonoring Trump and himself here:

The prolific X account “End Wokeness” found one of the worst examples; Cincinnati.com publishing a letter to an editor titled “Trump brings these assassination attempts on himself.”

And then there’s “The Hill,” who thought the real story was Republicans being angry over their candidate nearly being murdered for the second time.

Politico wasn’t much different:

The Atlantic’s Tom Nichols chimed in to argue that people wanting to kill Trump proves he shouldn’t be president.

The Washington Post initially reported on the assassination attempt as a “golf course episode,” while the New York Times reported “shots fired at Florida course,” and NBC called it the “Trump golf course incident.”

Here’s some reaction from X users:

This contribution from Paul Rossi illustrates an important concept that narcissistic and abusive people use to blame their victims for what a bully has done. DARVO stands for:

Deny
Attack
Reverse
Victim and
Offender

Crime Denial

Cat-eating Haitians in Small Town America, Courtesy of Joe Biden

/

The town of Springfield, Illinois, has been inundated with so many “immigrants” from Haiti in recent years the population has swelled by one third. Haiti is, of course, a third-world country and a failed state. Successive corrupt governments and lack of infrastructure and education mean that Haitians live a hardscrabble life, and the kinds of values one develops living hand to mouth don’t fit in well with those you find in ordinary American midwestern towns. 

The U.S. has granted Haitians a special protected status that lets them stay in the U.S. because conditions in their country are so poor. But there is no such special protected status for American citizens who say their communities simply cannot absorb (in this case, 20,000 Haitians poured into Springfield, a town of 60,000) that many foreigners without life breaking down. 

Now, the fight is on between people in Springfield and the Democrats and the media. Some in Springfield are claiming that some of the Haitians are killing and eating house cats as well as decapitating ducks at city parks to take home and eat. There’s a video circulating that purports to show a Haitian woman being arrested after killing and eating a cat. There’s another video of a local man complaining to city government that the Haitians are going down to parks and killing ducks for food. 

So, we have actual residents on camera telling public officials this is going on, but media from the New York Times on down to the local level is all pretending that it’s not real. They’re coming right out and saying it, calling these claims “racist,” or suggesting that it’s just something cooked up by right wingers and capitalized on by Donald Trump. 

But regardless of whether the claims about cats and ducks are true, Springfield really has been overrun by third-world refugees. Why? Author John LeFevre discussed this on Twitter/X:

Figures, doesn’t it? I’m sure we’ll be told soon by some Paper of Record that these 320,000 people don’t actually exist, and if they do, anyway, it’s a good thing. 

Here’s what Twitter/X users had to say in response:

This one has a good point:

This is what burns so many people up; their own government paid for by local tax dollars is on the side of foreigners, and makes sure to do PR for them by calling them “legal.”

Yep, it looks this way:

Britain, crime, Crime Denial

British Police Threaten to Extradite Americans-Including Elon Musk!

/

The kingdom that brought us George Orwell is on its knees to the very forces he predicted in the novel 1984. Riots have broken out in towns across the UK, and unusually, they’re mainly being done by white, native English people. We’re used to seeing Muslim-instigated street demonstrations and violence, which go largely unchecked by the police – but all of a sudden, the police care now.

Native Brits have had more than enough of the influx of illegal “migrants” who are transforming once classically English hamlets and cities into no-go zones for the native born (or, to borrow some language from the left, “the indigenous English”). The proximate cause of the violence is the recent fatal stabbing of three girls (and the critical wounding of 10 other children) at a dance class in Southport.

In fact, the alleged murderer is a 17-year-old who was born in Wales. But while the mainstream media likes to describe him simply as a Welshman, and a “boy,” the suspect was born to Rwandan immigrants. Whether this has anything to do with his motivations for the crime he is charged with is unclear, but it has brought out long repressed resentment among native Brits who believe their government cares more about pleasing foreigners than it does about protecting British subjects.  

Even more than the U.S., the UK government is utterly crazed about “equity” and “inclusion.” It has become impossible for any native Brit—most especially any white native Brit—to even express affection for towns that look and sound English without being accused of murderous “racism.” Brown people may honor and be proud of their culture. But white people cannot. 

Now the government has gone mad from the prime minister on down. Newly elected Labour PM Keir Starmer has made two addresses excoriating what he calls “thugs” and vandals, promising the harshest treatment. Starmer says nothing, of course, when Islamists knife Brits in the streets. 

With the imprimatur of Parliament, local police forces are salivating on television as they contemplate locking up English people for “online violence.” That’s right. The Crown Prosecution Service is filling its twitter feed with pictures of white Brits they’ve arrested in a way they would never do if the suspects were non-white. 

Now the chief of the Metropolitan Police in London, Sir Mark Rowley is threatening to extradite people from other countries into Britain to face prosecution if they say the wrong things online.

Rowley said to Sky News “We will throw the full force of the law at people. And whether you’re in this country committing crimes on the streets or committing crimes from further afield online, we will come after you.”

And apparently no one is safe – including Americans, and even Elon Musk. He added that “Being a keyboard warrior does not make you safe from the law,” and named “the likes of Elon Musk” as potential investigation targets for people to potentially charge for their social media comments outside the UK.

You can watch him say it himself below:

We’re happy to see that Americans on social media are reacting appropriately….

Crime Denial

District Attorney Prohibits Prosecution Due To “Disproportionate Impact” On Black Americans

/

A George Soros-backed District Attorney is prohibiting her prosecutors from pursuing gun and drug charges resulting from traffic stops.

Kim Foxx, a Democrat (obviously), is currently the District Attorney for Cook County, IL, where she manages the second largest prosecutor’s office in the United States. It is one of the more diverse areas of the country, with only 40% of residents being White. A quarter of its 5.2 million population are Hispanic, while 22.5% are Black.

In an interview shared on social media platform X, Foxx expressed her reluctance to prosecute following traffic stops as Black Americans are more likely to be carrying illegal firearms and drugs than other ethnic groups.

“Doing these searches – searches that have a “disproportionate impact on Black and Brown communities” – that don’t net a public safety benefit, we should not do that,” she told ABC’s I-Team. Like most leftists, Foxx is deliberately conflating Blacks being convicted at higher rates because they commit crimes at higher rates with them being “disproportionately impacted” – as if cops are arbitrarily arresting people based on skin color.

Under Foxx’s direction, state prosecutors would be unable to pursue charges which are “solely the product of a non-public-safety traffic stop,” even if illegal weapons or drugs were found in the vehicle.

Indeed, Black Americans are more likely to own an illegal weapon, with existing gun laws reportedly to blame.

Many on social media disagreed with Foxx’s race-based policy, with one drawing an example to financial crimes which may impact wealthy, White Americans more than other groups.

Foxx is not seeking re-election when the county goes to the polls later this year. Some, therefore, warned the region against voting for another candidate who may try to build on her existing policies.

crime, Crime Denial

Dallas Jail Calls Black Illegal Alien Murder Suspect “White”

/

If you like Wokespy, you’d like Blaze commentator and writer Auron MacIntyre. He’s pretty dogged on the woke beat, bringing out example after example of once-normal U.S. institutions gone mad.

This one’s a doozy. Some readers will probably think, “that must be a clerical error.” Must it, though? We live in a country where we are expected to believe and say that men can be women, that children can be born in the wrong body, and that it’s loving health care to mutilate the genitals and endocrine systems of minors.

We also live in a country where we are expected to repeat and believe that black Americans have it as bad or worse now as they did under Jim Crow, and before the Civil Rights Act. Companies are brazenly breaking federal anti-discrimination laws by openly restricting jobs to “people of color,” while the government itself privileges black citizens over white ones.

This writer is not so sure the example below can be chalked up to a typo.

We have a picture of a man that nearly anyone would describe as black or Hispanic-black. There isn’t a single adult of ordinary mental competence who would describe this alleged murderer as a white man.

According to the Blaze article, 44-year-old Yunier Aldazabal stabbed his girlfriend to death then fled in a car. He is an illegal alien, although his country of origin is not yet publicly known.

Why is the Dallas County Jail describing him as white? After all, they have many other options in their system.

Let’s see what social media users think. Several say their states are pulling the same fast one.

Maybe 10 years ago you’d be tempted to say Charmane was a “conspiracy theorist”. But now?

Bob isn’t buying it.

We suspect Terri has it right.

What do you think? Let us know in the comments!

Crime Denial

Far-Left Judge Urges Against Politicizing Murder Of 12-Year-Old at Hands of Illegal Aliens Moments After Politicizing It to Slam Republicans

/

Lina Hidalgo, the Democrat Judge of Harris County, TX, has been slammed for politicizing the killing of a 12-year-old girl allegedly at the hands of illegal aliens, just moments before calling on others NOT to politicize her death.

Jocelyn Nungray was killed in North Houston, TX, on the evening of Sunday, June 16, in a brutal attack in which she was also sexually assaulted.

Two men – 22-year-old Johan José Martínez-Rangel and 26-year-old Franklin José Peña Ramos – have been charged with capital murder of the 12-year-old. Both are believed to be illegal immigrants – a term which still triggers the left.

At a press conference, Judge Hidalgo said “evil happens regardless of immigration status” while urging fellow politicians not to politicize the barbaric attack. She then preceded to criticize Congressional Republicans and former president Donald Trump for the conditions that led to Nungray’s death.

After claiming “Trump won’t let” President Joe Biden and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell “move forward” with a bipartisan immigration bill, Judge Hidalgo came under criticism from reporters who called out her obvious hypocrisy.

“With all due respect Judge, you said the issue shouldn’t be politicized. But by pointing the finger at President Trump and Republicans in Congress, aren’t you politicizing it?” one asked.

“I think I answered the question,” responded Hidalgo, who was pressed again on the apparent hypocrisy but refused to develop her response. Sure enough, it was picked up on by online commenters.

Many were skeptical over her capability as a judge in the third-most populous county in the United States.

Her hypocritical pleas also encouraged others to share their views on the administration’s immigration policy.

crime, Crime Denial

Town Council Criticized For Prioritizing Pride Flag Over Thin Blue Line After Death Of Police Officer

/

A town council in Connecticut has come under heavy scrutiny after refusing to fly the thin blue line flag just weeks after the death of a local police officer.

Trooper First Class Aaron Pelletier was killed in the line of duty earlier this month, prompting renewed calls to fly the flag in Wethersfield which began following the death of Deputy Robert “Bobby” Garten in September 2023.

However, despite local outrage, councilmembers have stuck by the decision to not fly the flag, instead opting to fly the pride flag at Wethersfield Town Council instead.

On Monday, June 3rd, councilmembers voted 5-3 not to fly the thin blue line flag on the day of Trooper First Class Pelletier’s funeral, with Democratic Deputy Mayor Matthew Forest arguing that it was “emblematic of white nationalist, neo-Nazi and alt-right movements in the United States”.

A follow-up debate exactly two weeks later saw tensions on all sides, with family members of the victims expressing their discontent at the council’s decision. Some members of the public, however, expressed support for the council given that flying the thin blue line flag would have breached its recently updated policy to require a 30-day notice period before any flag can be flown.  

Footage from the meeting was shared on the social media platform X (formally known as Twitter).

Many social media users were dismayed at the insensitivity of flying a pride flag over one which symbolizes support for police.

Others recognized the divisions by the move and offered alternative solutions.

What’s your view? Did Wethersfield Town Council make the correct decision, or should an exception have been made? Let us know in the comments below.


Subscribe Form

© 2025 WokeSpy All Rights Reserved

Scroll to Top