Author name: Million Voices

Trump Orders End To Green Energy Funding, Citing National Security
National Affairs

Trump Orders End To Green Energy Funding, Citing National Security

/

Brian Jason / Shutterstock.com

President Donald Trump issued an executive order in early June calling for an end to green energy subsidies, citing national security concerns and overt and unnecessary costs to taxpayers.

Despite the rapid roll-out of so-called renewable energies — that never offset the fossil fuels required to create and run these systems — tax-payers have seen zero reducing in the cost of living, energy, or anything related to our energy grid (which is everything), all while there are growing concerns that reliance on renewable energies poses a major national security threat.

What Does The Order State?

“For too long, the Federal Government has forced American taxpayers to subsidize expensive and unreliable energy sources like wind and solar.  The proliferation of these projects displaces affordable, reliable, dispatchable domestic energy sources, compromises our electric grid, and denigrates the beauty of our Nation’s natural landscape,” Trump’s order states.

“Moreover, reliance on so-called ‘green’ subsidies threatens national security by making the United States dependent on supply chains controlled by foreign adversaries.  Ending the massive cost of taxpayer handouts to unreliable energy sources is vital to energy dominance, national security, economic growth, and the fiscal health of the Nation.”

No More Taxpayer Support

The order further directs the U.S. to end all forms of taxpayer support for green energy, which is likely a huge blow to states like Arizona, where lawmakers are looking to acquire public land to build massive solar farms.

Democratic Arizona Sen. Ruben Gallego claimed the “legislation will allow La Paz County to continue this project, developing a planned 500 MW of solar capacity and up to 900 MWH of battery storage, which is enough to power about 75,000 homes. The project will create 700 construction jobs and 10 permanent positions,” suggesting its impact is actually minimal.

Fellow Democratic Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly also spoke in support of the bill, saying it’ll allow the small number of homes will be powered by so-called “clean” energy, despite the sites being both eye sores and highly disruptive to the actual environment it claims to protect.

Please visit Million Voices for more stories like this.

Obama-Appointed Judge Delivers Second Amendment Win
News

Obama-Appointed Judge Delivers Second Amendment Win

/
Conceal Carry / Shutterstock

From Daily Caller News Foundation Reporter Ireland Owens

A District Court judge ruled on Tuesday that California should allow non-residents to apply for concealed carry weapons (CCWs) licenses.

Cathy Ann Bencivengo, a U.S. District Court judge for the Southern District of California, issued an order which granted summary judgment after finding the state’s “provisions barring nonresidents from applying for CCW licenses violate the Constitution.” The plaintiffs in the case, who are not California residents, complained that they have been prohibited from carrying a firearm for self-defense when they visit the state, according to Bencivengo’s order.

“Opening the application process to nonresidents does not limit California’s ability to regulate who receives a CCW license based on other measured parameters,” according to the order. “Nonresidents are simply afforded the same chance guaranteed to residents to exercise their Second Amendment rights.”

The lawsuit’s plaintiffs are members of the Firearms Policy Coalition, a gun rights organization. The group describes its mission as restoring “the essential right to keep and bear arms throughout the U.S.”

Bencivengo wrote in her order that the parties in the lawsuit are required to “meet and confer and submit a proposed order for an injunction consistent with this order within 30 days.”

Former President Barack Obama nominated Bencivengo in May 2011, and the Senate confirmed her in February 2012. The Firearms Policy Coalition did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

Please check out Million Voices as well for more articles like this

Major Threats to U.S. Energy Grid Could End Millions of Lives
National Affairs

Major Threats to U.S. Energy Grid Could End Millions of Lives

/

Shutterstock/GridFailure

The Department of Energy released a report in early July detailing the major threats to the nation’s energy grid system, and the results are not great.

The opening of the DOE’s report reads like something at the start of an apocalypse movie: “analysis reveals that existing generation retirements and delays in adding new firm capacity, driven by the radical green agenda of past administrations, will lead to a surge in power outages and a growing mismatch between electricity demand and supply, particularly from artificial intelligence (AI)-driven data center growth, threatening America’s energy security.”

In layman’s terms, America’s energy grid is nowhere near security, stable, or modern enough to survive any of the major constant potential threats or disruptions.

“This report affirms what we already know: The United States cannot afford to continue down the unstable and dangerous path of energy subtraction previous leaders pursued, forcing the closure of baseload power sources like coal and natural gas,” Secretary Chris Wright said in the statement.

“In the coming years, America’s reindustrialization and the AI race will require a significantly larger supply of around-the-clock, reliable, and uninterrupted power. President Trump’s administration is committed to advancing a strategy of energy addition, and supporting all forms of energy that are affordable, reliable, and secure. If we are going to keep the lights on, win the AI race, and keep electricity prices from skyrocketing, the United States must unleash American energy.”

What Are The Major Threats To Our Grid?

– Terrorism / Cyberattacks: Whether it is terrorists physically attacking our grid with guns or using cyberattacks to target the technology, almost all aspects of our grid are vulnerable and likely would not withstand such an attack.

– Solar Energy / Magnetic Field: There actually isn’t really anything we can do to survive a major collapse in our magnetic field (something that has occurred with regularity throughout our history on this planet). One option would be to move most of our major energy substations underground, or somewhere that solar/cosmic radiation cannot destroy all circuits.

– Extreme Weather Events: The National Weather Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is filled with experts who can and want to do something about the constant threat of extreme weather events — not just to our grid, but to our lives — but we need a full audit and total shakeup of current systems and leadership to see this happen.

– Load Growth: “With projected load growth, retirements increase the risk of power outages by 100 times in 2030,” the report states

– Outdated Tech/Tools: “Traditional peak-hour tests to evaluate resource adequacy do not sufficiently account for growing dependence on neighboring grids.”

What Happens If The Grid Goes Down?

America is only nine meals away from civilization collapse. We already know that bad actors use power outages to loot, hurt others, and commit horrific crimes, but what happens if the power goes out for an extended period of time across the whole country?

Firstly, your food and water supply disappears. Grocery stores will no longer exist, and most first responders and agency workers employed to protect you will be forced to protect their own families first.

People in hospitals may survive so long as the generators keep working. But this won’t last long. There will be no means of pumping gas at the stations, so trucks won’t be able to deliver you all the things you rely on, including essential medication.

Even a month-long shut down of the U.S. energy grid has the potential to end millions of lives within less than a week, and may reset our nation back to something resembling a warzone. The luckiest people will be able to source water, food, and fuel (ie: wood, other burnable materials) locally. People in cities will be hurt the hardest and fastest. Farmers will probably survive and thrive.


“Grid Down, Power Up”

One of the best ways to learn more about the vulnerabilities and options to update our grid are to watch Dennis Quaid’s fantastic documentary “Grid Down, Power Up.”


Please visit Million Voices for more stories like this.

Churches Legally Allowed to Endorse Political Candidates, Says IRS
Culture War

Churches Legally Allowed to Endorse Political Candidates, Says IRS

/

Caleb Oquendo from Pexels

The IRS ruled Monday that churches and other tax-exempt nonprofit houses of worship are allowed to endorse political candidates to their congregation.

The decision by the IRS comes as a result of a lawsuit filed by two churches and the National Religious Broadcasters (linked below), changing the tax code and essentially upending the previous Johnson Amendment, according to The Hill.

The ruling is yet another major win for religious freedoms across America, ending yet another limitation placed on churches in engaging in a political system that directly impacts all people of faith.

What Are Churches Allowed To Do?

The IRS stated in the filing that: “Bona fide communications internal to a house of worship, between the house of worship and its congregation, in connection with religious services, do neither of those things, any more than does a family discussion concerning candidates.”

The IRS has rarely enforced any rulings related to endorsing political candidates. At least 18 churches have endorsed various political candidates in recent years and absolutely nothing happened to them, likely because any lawsuit that could be filed in this type of situation would have led to exactly the result we see this week.

Freedom Of Religion & The First Amendment

Any prohibitions to endorsing political candidates would have created “serious tension” with the First Amendment, the IRS added.

“For many houses of worship, the exercise of their religious beliefs includes teaching or instructing their congregations regarding all aspects of life, including guidance concerning the impact of faith on the choices inherent in electoral politics,” the IRS stated.


Read The Full Ruling

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KGM9BASOhZZ-CWNVEGRa3IIZc_cpW0HI/view

Please visit Million Voices for more stories like this.

California Found To Have Violated Title IX By Discriminating Against Women And Girls
Culture War

California Found To Have Violated Title IX By Discriminating Against Women And Girls

/

Sheila Fitzgerald / Shutterstock.com

The Department of Education (DOE) found in late June that California violated Title IX by discriminating against female athletes based on their gender.

The DOE was investigating California’s state-based DOE and the California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) based on allegations its members and leadership violated federal law by allowing athletes to compete in athletic events under their so-called “gender identity” rather than their actual biological sex, according to JustTheNews.

“Although Governor Gavin Newsom admitted months ago it was ‘deeply unfair’ to allow men to compete in women’s sports, both the California Department of Education and the California Interscholastic Federation continued as recently as a few weeks ago to allow men to steal female athletes’ well-deserved accolades and to subject them to the indignity of unfair and unsafe competitions,” Education Sec. Linda McMahon said in a statement shared by the Education Department. “The Trump Administration will relentlessly enforce Title IX protections for women and girls, and our findings today make clear that California has failed to adhere to its obligations under federal law. The state must swiftly come into compliance with Title IX or face the consequences that follow.”

Resolution Agreement

The DOE Office for Civil Rights (OCR) issued a proposed Resolution Agreement to California’s DOE and CIF to resolve the violation, offering both entities the opportunity to “voluntarily agree to change these unlawful practices within 10 days or risk imminent enforcement action, including referral to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) for proceedings,” the statement continues.

The Resolution Agreement requires:

1. The CDE will issue a Notice to all recipients of federal funding (Recipients) that operate interscholastic athletic programs in California requiring them to comply with Title IX. This will specify that Title IX and its implementing regulations forbids schools from allowing males from participating in female sports and from occupying female intimate facilities, and that Recipients must adopt biology-based definitions of the words ‘male’ and ‘female’;

2. The CDE will issue a Notice advising Recipients that any interpretation of California state law conflicting with the Department’s Resolution Agreement is preempted by federal law under Title IX;

3. The CDE and CIF will rescind any guidance that advised local school districts or CIF members to permit male athletes to participate in women’s and girls’ sports to reflect that Title IX preempts state law when state law conflicts with Title IX;

4. CDE will require all Recipients, including CIF, to restore to female athletes all individual records, titles, and awards misappropriated by male athletes competing in female competitions;

5. To each female athlete to whom an individual recognition is restored, CDE will send a personalized letter apologizing on behalf of the state of California for allowing her educational experience to be marred by sex discrimination; and

6. The CDE will require each Recipient and CIF to submit to CDE an annual certification that the Recipient and CIF have complied with Title IX. Accordingly, CDE will also propose to OCR a Monitoring Plan to ensure that Recipients are fully complying with Title IX.

    Will Newsom’s State Comply?

    While it was news to most that Newsom said anything regarding how deeply unfair and immoral it is to allow mentally ill young men to compete in women’s sports, we’ve already seen him blatantly backtrack on this statement — proving that he is not interested in medical science, nor the rights of women and girls throughout his state.

    Within hours of the DOE’s ruling, his press office shared a meme of McMahon from her days running WWE. “Secretary McMahon is confusing government with her WrestleMania days — dramatic, fake, and completely divorced from reality. This won’t stick,” his press office noted in an earlier post, suggesting that Newsom is once again saying whatever he thinks is best for the future of his political career at that exact moment in time, and not considering the long-term consequences of his actions or statements.

    Newsom Is Anti-Women’s Rights

    “Newsom’s joke is not going over so well on social media, with many people and women’s rights groups pointing out that the clip is of a man physically overpowering a woman,” the National News Desk reported.

    California may be a hotbed for championing women’s rights to kill their unborn children, it does not appear that Newsom and his fellow leaders are willing to admit that allowing mentally ill young men to compete in women’s sports has destroyed all progress made by women over the last fifty or so years.

    The state has also been a national leader in allowing many felony offenses to be reduced to misdemeanors, making it easier for criminals to target the most vulnerable citizens — often women and children. In 2021, the state released a spate of violent criminals early, and planned similar releases in 2024 despite massive public backlash. Many of those released early went back to prison, proving that “soft on crime” policies actually just make it easier to commit crimes. The main reasons people were returned to prisons were: “illegally possessing a gun (14% of all cases), assault (10%), and burglary (9%). Vehicle theft, second-degree robbery and domestic abuse each accounted for about 4 to 5% of offenses,” according to CalMatters.

    Please visit Million Voices for more articles like this.

    Democrat Lawmaker Threatens To Put Law Enforcement Lives In Danger For Apparent Publicity Stunt
    Democrats

    Democrat Lawmaker Threatens To Put Law Enforcement Lives In Danger For Apparent Publicity Stunt

    /

    lev radin / Shutterstock.com

    House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Wednesday that he will be exposing the identities of ICE agents in what appeared to be a shocking publicity stunt, threatening the lives and wellbeing of possibly thousands of law enforcement officers and their families.

    ICE agents have been using face masks during operations to protect themselves and their loved ones from retribution by cartels and terrorist organizations, as well as other nefarious actors, due to a horrific 413% increase in violence against ICE agents, according to reports from Newsweek and Turning Point USA.

    “People are out there taking photos of the names, their faces, and posting them online with death threats to their family and themselves,” Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons explained in a press conference in early June.

    Jeffries Doesn’t Care About Protecting Americans

    “Every single ICE agent who’s engaged in this aggressive overreach and are trying to hide their identities from the American people will be unsuccessful in doing that,” Jeffries said of the situation.

    “This is America. This is not the Soviet Union,” he added. “We’re not behind the Iron Curtain. This is not the 1930s. And every single one of them, no matter what it takes, no matter how long it takes, will of course be identified.” It is fair to presume that if Jeffries has his way, ICE agents and their families would be at even greater risk of horrific violence, particularly from cartels and terrorist organizations.

    Jeffries is among a growing cohort of Democrats who will likely throw their hats in the ring for the 2028 presidential election. We strongly encourage you to watch this clip of him and ask yourself if you’d feel safer in an America run by him, his friends, and his policies?

    Watch The Full Clip:

    Please visit Million Voices for more articles like this.

    So-Called Experts Cause Panic Over New COVID-19 Variant As WHO Eyes Global Takeover?
    COVID

    So-Called Experts Cause Panic Over New COVID-19 Variant As WHO Eyes Global Takeover?

    /

    Shutterstock/COVID

    A “new” COVID variant is making the rounds through media in early June, just weeks after China and the World Health Organization (WHO) manipulated most of the world into signing a legally-binding contract to hand their unelected officials control during the next major pandemic.

    The corporate news media needs you to believe and be scared of a new COVID variant called NB.1.8.1, according to NPR, but there were only 518 cases across 22 countries, as of May. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is recommending parents talk to their doctors about having their children vaccinated against the disease, despite research proving that the COVID-19 vaccine causes long COVID and other horrific post-COVID vaccine syndromes (PCVS) in a currently unknown number of people. Experts who spoke with Million Voices on condition of strict anonymity estimate that as many as 20 million Americans could currently be suffering from PCVS and have no idea.

    WHO — who stand to gain the most control and money in the face of another “pandemic” — claim the variant has been around since mid-February 2025.

    “There has been an increase in SARS-CoV-2 activity globally, based on SARS-CoV-2 data reported to the Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS) from sentinel surveillance sites,” WHO wrote in a disease alert. “As of 11 May 2025, the test positivity rate is 11% across 73 reporting countries, areas and territories. This level matches the peak observed in July 2024 (12% from 99 countries) and marks a rise from 2% reported by 110 countries back in mid-February 2025.”

    It is unclear how much those individuals and institutions reporting cases COVID-19 are getting paid per positive test. Hospitals and healthcare providers earned huge amounts of money during the COVID-19 pandemic, with some calling the creation of COVID and its subsequent testing and largely ineffective treatments a “windfall” for Big Pharma, according to Fierce Healthcare.

    Pandemic Power Grab 2.0?

    The alleged variant appeared just weeks the creation of a legally-binding agreement that would essentially allow WHO to create and operate a type of globalized “New World Order,” predominantly funded by China, if a new global pandemic emerged. The timing on this is likely not coincidental, though it is extremely frustrating to realize that WHO members and the rest of the world think we’re clearly stupid enough to fall for this situation a second time.

    Thankfully, President Donald Trump refused to sign the agreement. If he had, the U.S. would lose all sovereign control, essentially rendering us a non-nation, existing in a “global surveillance superstate.”

    What Is COVID NB.1.8.1?

    NB.1.8.1 presents with symptoms similar to previous COVID variants and other flu-like illnesses:

    Fever or chills
    Cough Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing
    Fatigue Muscle or body aches
    Headache
    New loss of taste or smell
    Sore throat
    Congestion or runny nose
    Nausea or vomiting
    Diarrhea

    Taiwan (also known as China’s next nation to invade) reportedly weekly highs of COVID-19 cases, with 63,000 COVID-19 related medical visits and 132 severe cases in late May, according to Focus Taiwan.

    Please visit Million Voices for more articles like this.

    Seattle Mayor Appears To Blame Christians For Being Violently Attacked
    Culture War

    Seattle Mayor Appears To Blame Christians For Being Violently Attacked

    /

    VDB Photos / Shutterstock.com / IMAGE NOT OF MAYDAY EVENT

    Lead pastor of Pursuit NW, Russell Johnson, is demanding Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell resign after he blamed Christians for “provoking” violence against them at a rally in May.

    The faith-based MayDay USA organization, known for encouraging Christians to speak out on the issues that matter most to us, like abortion, child trafficking, and more, were met by an estimated 500 counter-protestors during their May rally at Cal Anderson Park in Seattle, Washington. The protestors were waving flags in support of “transgender” people, and started clashing with law enforcement “almost immediately after gathering around 1 p.m., with officers in riot gear being shoved and soon pelted with water bottles and other items,” according to the New York Post.

    An estimated 23 protestors were arrested over the course of five hours, and it is unclear how many of them were from the “Keep Your Bibles off Our Bodies,” but reports reviewed by Million Voices suggest all but one of those placed under arrest came from the counter-Christian protest. All of those arrested were released on their own personal recognizance by Judge Pro Tem Sarah Perez, according to local radio host Jason Rantz.

    The purpose of MayDay’s event was to promote family values and the #Dontmesswithourkids tours, the outlet noted. The Seattle mayor felt the need to describe the situation very differently from those who were present, and a majority of the press:

    Mayor Harrell’s Statement

    “Seattle is proud of our reputation as a welcoming, inclusive city for LGBTQ+ communities, and we stand with our trans neighbors when they face bigotry and injustice. Today’s far-right rally was held here for this very reason – to provoke a reaction by promoting beliefs that are inherently opposed to our city’s values, in the heart of Seattle’s most prominent LGBTQ+ neighborhood,” Harrell said in a statement.

    “When the humanity of trans people and those who have been historically marginalized is questioned, we triumph by demonstrating our values through our words and peaceful protest – we lose our voice when this is disrupted by violence, chaos, and confusion.” He then blamed “anarchists” who “infiltrated the counter-protestors group and inspired violence, prompting SPD to make arrests and ask organizers to shut down the event early, which they did.”

    Harrell is having “the Parks Department to review all of the circumstances of this application to understand whether there were legal location alternatives or other adjustments that could have been pursued,” but felt the need to note that this is being done almost despite the “broad First Amendment requirements around permitting events under free speech protections.”

    Johnson seemed to be encouraged that Harrell is having the Parks Department look into the situation, as emails show that the rally was not supposed to take place in the park, as the organizers shared evidence they requested a permit for Pike Place. This permit was rejected, and Cal Anderson Park was suggested by the city, according to a screenshot shared by Johnson.

    Christian & Legal Response

    “The Mayor of Seattle owes Christians in WA State an apology for his bigoted remarks after folks who were holding a peaceful worship event at Cal Anderson Park were violently assaulted for the high crime of expressing their deeply held religious beliefs in the form of a permitted worship event on city property,” Johnson wrote on social media. “23 antifa thugs were arrested,” he added.

    “Cops were hospitalized. Church people were assaulted. And the Mayor of Seattle has the audacity to blame Christians for the violence.”

    Screenshot/X/howertonjosh

    Screenshot/x/ADFLegal

    Please visit Million Voices for more stories like this.

    Experts Share Chilling Warning About America’s Nuclear Capabilities
    News

    Experts Share Chilling Warning About America’s Nuclear Capabilities

    /

    Shutterstock / Nuclear Bomb

    Experts shared terrifying warnings in May about U.S. nuclear capabilities compared to China’s rapid development.

    America’s nuclear stockpiles have plummeted to levels “not seen since the 1960s,” according to CBN, while China continues to invest huge efforts in increasing their nuclear weapon capabilities to an “unprecedented” level. Some estimates suggest the U.S. has just 1,700 nuclear weapons, the newest of which is more than 35 years old. Our military has also withdrawn many of our nuclear weapons from across our Asian bases, meaning the U.S. has no nuclear option in the Pacific should China invade Taiwan.

    “All of this requires urgent action,” Former Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Reagan administration Frank Gaffney, host of “Securing America,” told the outlet. “All of that has essentially gone over the side. I can’t tell you how frustrating it is, having experienced all of that, to see what we are hoping that nobody notices that we haven’t done a whole lot with our nuclear deterrent since I left the Pentagon.”

    China, Global Threat Continues To Loom

    China has tripled the size of its nuclear arsenal in the last five years, becoming the world’s fastest growing nuclear superpower. “I think that they are increasing the size of their nuclear arsenal, because they want to use it to coerce others into standing down,” China expert Gordon Change explained to CBN.

    The Chinese Communist Party is said to have taken note from Russian leader Vladimir Putin, who used the threat of nuclear war to advance his operations in Ukraine, and limit Western involvement in the war. “So the Chinese saw that this actually works. I think that they will precede any invasion of Taiwan, Japan, whatever, with threats to use their nuclear weapons to get the U.S. not to come to the aid of its friends and partners,” Chang stated.

    China’s mentality toward nuclear war is much different to the U.S. “They never bought this idea that Ronald Reagan, my mild and much-revered boss, famously said, which is ‘a nuclear war, can never be won and must never be fought.’ They don’t buy that. They believe nuclear war is a thing – a nuclear war is something that can be used decisively,” Gaffney mused.

    Concerns of nuclear provocation were most recently raised by India and Pakistan. Though experts such as Ankit Panda felt this was also a type of nuclear blackmail (also called a nuclear deterrence, such as that used by Putin), it could be that the old methods of nuclear signaling aren’t as sufficient in their deterrence as they used to be.

    What Happens Next?

    Experts want the U.S. to return some of our nuclear weapons to our bases across the Pacific. Though this may face significant opposition from political leaders, it may be necessary given the growing threat of nuclear attacks from Russia, North Korea, and Iran.

    But would returning nuclear weapons to these bases be provocative? Vox argued that because humanity has lived with these threats for 80 years, as of 2025, we sometimes take our peace for granted.

    Several European nations are repeatedly discussing building up their nuclear arsenal, as of the last few weeks (from time of writing). South Korea is actively debating the development of a more substantial nuclear program. Vox notes how President Donald Trump has actively proposed “denuclearization” talks with Russia and China, something that experts like Chang think is unlikely to come to fruition.

    International Atomic Energy Agency director general Rafael Mariano Grossi told journalists in late May that the U.S. and Iran may be in a place to come to an agreement over their nuclear capabilities. “For the moment, the jury is still out,” Grossi noted, but seemed a little lighter when adding that it is a good sign that both nations are continuing to meet on the matter.

    Please visit Million Voices for more stories like this.

    British Lord Calls For Trump To Receive Nobel Peace Prize Nomination
    Trump

    British Lord Calls For Trump To Receive Nobel Peace Prize Nomination

    /

    noamgalai / Shutterstock.com

    Member of the House of Lords, Lord Sarfraz, called upon the British government to nominate President Donald Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize for his work in preventing war between India and Pakistan.

    The Pakistani-heritage businessman and Conservative member of Britain’s House of Lords, submitted a formal request to Prime Minister Keir Starmer in early May, so Starmer might nominate Trump for the prize “in recognition for his instrumental role in averting a full-scale war between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan,” Breitbart reported.

    “India and Pakistan were at the brink – once again – but like never before. The nuclear-armed neighbours had just participated in one of the most prolific aerial combat events of recent time, involving over 125 fighter jets. Multiple missiles had been launched deep inside each other’s territory. Civilian casualties were mounting. Critical assets were being destroyed. Temperatures were very high,” Sarfraz wrote in a statement.

    “Without President Trump’s direct efforts, a ceasefire would not have been possible. The consequences of further escalation could have been devastating for the region and the world. Whatever one’s political views, the President has been Peacemaker-In-Chief during this conflict.”

    Second Time’s A Charm?

    Trump was also nominated for multiple Nobel Peace Prize during his first term in office. One of the most notable came after his work brokering the Abraham Accords, Breitbart added. His work on peace efforts between North and South Koreas, and Serbia and Kosovo, also saw our president receive a nod for nomination.

    Surprising absolutely no one, the Nobel Committee — appointed by the Norwegian Parliament — has “so far shot down all efforts to grant the U.S. leader the esteemed peace prize,” Breitbart added. The committee did award former President Barack Obama the prize in 2009 before he came into office, with many, including the former head of the committee, saying that “even many of Obama’s supporters believed that the prize was a mistake.”

    Trump Inspiring Britain To Be More American

    Though the British public elected a far-leftist government, Starmer’s leadership has seen the country fall further into the same sort of collapse the U.S. experienced since the COVID-19 pandemic (particularly due to mass immigration).

    Screenshot/x/charliekirk11

    Starmer said in a recent public statement that the nation needs to regain border control, while urging immigrants to learn English as the country has turned into an “island of strangers.”

    Please visit Million Voices for more stories like this


    Scroll to Top