Author name: Shay Bottomley

News

Historical Moment As Catholics And Protestants March Together In Belfast to Protest Mass Immigration

A Belfast march demanding an end to mass immigration has gone viral amid large-scale protests across the United Kingdom.

The U.K. has witnessed violent scenes following a victory for the Labour Party in July 4’s general election. Rioting by pro-Palestinian activists followed in Leeds, signaling the start of a turbulent period for the country.

After three children were murdered in Southport, England, on Tuesday, July 30, right-wing protesters have taken to the streets demanding the newly elected government take action. These protests have spread across the country, resulting in arrests and criminal damage on a nightly basis.

However, one of the more surprising scenes took place in Northern Ireland, where, in a historic moment, Catholics and Protestants marched side by side in a protest against mass immigration.

Many on social media noted the significance of the march.

Others wondered why mainstream media outlets had not covered the events in a region closely associated with President Joe Biden.

Some, for sure, were confused.

Catholics and Protestants have long been divided over the situation in Northern Ireland; the former are strongly in favor of unification with the Republic of Ireland, while Protestants have historically favored its existing status under British rule.

So much were the differences that the country saw a prolonged period of violence known as The Troubles. Militant groups both loyal and opposed to the British government engaged in a 27-year guerrilla campaign, with civilian infrastructure and landmarks of military significance regularly targeted by both sides. Even today, some three decades after The Troubles ended, the two sides strongly disagree over the status of Northern Ireland.

To see both united on a single issue is quite simply extraordinary.

Media

Doug Emhoff’s Ex-Wife Responds To Reports Of Affair During 16-Year Marriage

A bizarre conversation on social media has gone viral after the ex-wife of Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff called out Usha Vance – the wife of Donald Trump’s running mate J.D. Vance.

Kerstin Emhoff was married to Kamala Harris’ now-husband from 1992 to 2008, during which time they had two children.

On Wednesday, July 31, Kerstin reposted a Kamala HQ video which accused Sen. Vance of “going to war against” childless people.

“Usha’s going to be in the ex-wives club in 2025. Mark my words,” she wrote on X.

Three days later, news broke that the Second Gentleman impregnated his daughter’s nanny while married to Kerstin. Sure enough, the article was quickly shared back to her.

Many on social media expressed their disbelief at the absurdity of the situation.

Kerstin issued a statement to the Washington Post following news of the affair.

“Doug and I decided to end our marriage for a variety of reasons, many years ago,” she said. “He is a great father to our kids, continues to be a great friend to me and I am really proud of the warm and supportive blended family Doug, Kamala, and I have built together.”

What a weird bunch.

News

Republican Sen. Launches Investigation Into Google Following Election Interference Allegations

A Republican Senator has launched an investigation amid concerns over censorship and bias on Google’s search engine.

Sen. Dr. Roger Marshall of Kansas launched the investigation, accusing the technological giant of “constricting the free flow of information.”

“Google, the largest Search Engine Operator in the world, has become a propaganda wing of the Left,” he wrote on the social media platform X. “No more hiding behind your algorithm – your time is up.”

The controversy began at the end of July when social media users noticed that certain search terms related to the attempted assassination of Donald Trump were omitted from the recommended autofill options. In addition, searches such as “Trump rally” would instead direct readers to news about presidential rival Vice President Kamala Harris.

“Google’s failure to provide suggestions related to the assassination attempt against President Trump on July 13, 2024, as part of its search function is yet another example of censorship against conservative voices and violates the intent of Section 230,” Sen. Marshall wrote in a letter to Google CEO Sundar Pichai. “Omitting suggestions to the most obvious and recent victim of an assassination attempt shows a willful discrimination against President Trump and users of your search engine.”

“Google advertises itself as a search engine and aggregator, not a censor,” he continued. “If Google wishes to become to a publishing firm or editor, Congress could then regulate accordingly by removing the sacred Section 230 protections your firm has long used to silence conservative voices.”

Many on social media were supportive of Sen. Marshall’s investigation.

Others were more critical in their stance on Google.

Media

Republican Sen. Destroys CNN Anchor As Kamala Harris Dodges The Media

President Joe Biden’s decision not to stand for re-election has thrust Vice President Kamala Harris into the political spotlight.

As the Democratic Party’s presumptive presidential nominee, Harris has been on a whistlestop tour in a bid to salvage her reputation as one of America’s least popular Vice Presidents.

However, her stops around the country seldom seem to take place in front of journalists, prompting Republican opponents to question why she has gone into hiding.

Appearing on CNN’s The Source with Kaitlan Collins on Wednesday, July 31, Sen. Tom Cotton said it was “refreshing” to see Republican candidate Donald Trump face tough questions in reference to his appearance before the National Association of Black Journalists earlier in the week.

“It turned out to be a hostile, adversarial interview, but he’s been doing that for nine years. Kamala Harris, meanwhile, has been hiding out for the 10 days that she’s been a president nominee,” Sen. Cotton said.

The discussion turned to controversial remarks made by the former president in which he said he “didn’t know” she was Black amid allegations that she has changed her preferred ethnicity for electoral gain.

“Four years ago, Joe Biden said, ‘if you don’t vote for him, you ain’t Black’ – could you imagine a more insulting comment?” Cotton asked. “Joe Biden is presuming to judge the political views of one-eighth of our citizens based on their skin color – did you ever ask Kamala Harris to condemn his remarks?”

The conversation moved on following a war of words between Cotton and Collins (below)

Cotton was referring to a memorable debate moment where Harris implied that Biden was racist right after saying she didn’t think he was racist at a 2020 Democratic debate.

“So, on the issue of race, I couldn’t agree more that this is an issue that is still not being talked about truthfully and honestly. There is not a Black man I know, be he a relative, a friend or a coworker who has not been the subject of some form of profiling or discrimination,” Harris said during the debate. “And I will say also that in this campaign, we’ve also heard—and I’m going to now direct this to Vice President Biden. I do not believe you are a racist and I agree with you when you commit yourself to the importance of finding common ground.”

She then went on to add “You also worked with them to oppose busing. And you know, there was a little girl in California who was part of the second class to integrate her public schools and she was bused to school every day, and that little girl was me. So, I will tell you that on this subject, it cannot be an intellectual debate among Democrats. We have to take it seriously. We have to act swiftly,” Harris added.

In the exchange she also blasted Biden, telling him it was “hurtful” to “hear you talk about the reputations of two United States senators who built their reputations and career on segregation of race in this country.” She was referencing Biden working with two former segregationists, Senators James Eastland and Herman Talmadge. Biden commented in 2019 that there was “at least some civility” in working with them.

Many praised the Arkansas Sen. for his handling of the interview.

Others were more critical of Harris’ continued avoidance of the media.

There was also criticism of CNN itself.

Media

Social Media Corrects Fact-Checking Website Over Kamala Harris’ Support For Illegal Alien Health Care Coverage

Political websites and mainstream media organizations are continuing their desperate attempts to promote Kamala Harris.

The Democratic Party’s presumptive presidential nominee has enjoyed a relatively easy ride since President Joe Biden announced his intention to stand down last month. Left-leaning websites have removed previous accusations, while others have contradicted their own reporting about the Vice President.

PolitiFact, which assesses claims made about politicians it doesn’t like, said Donald Trump’s comment that Harris “endorsed free taxpayer-funded government health care for all illegal aliens” was “mostly false”.

How something can be “mostly false” is a story for another day. Importantly, the site deemed Trump to have told a lie.

Except, he hadn’t.

Thanks to the joys of social media, we can now verify sources independently, as the End Wokeness account did on Wednesday, July 31.

The account shared a 30-second clip of Harris speaking with CNN about a bill covering health for those who entered the country illegally (below). “Let me be just very clear about this: I’m opposed to any policy that would deny, in our country, any human being from access to public safety, public education, or public health. Period,” the then-Sen. for California said.

And that wasn’t all.

On the debate stage during the 2020 Democratic Primary, where she garnered exactly zero delegates, all the candidates were asked if they support free healthcare for illegals, all of which affirmed they would:

Even Elon Musk chimed in to comment on the absurdity.

Others noted that PolitiFact’s claim was “mostly false.”

News

Texas High School Reverses “Unconstitutional” Removal Of Donald Trump Parking Lot Murals

A North Texas high school was slammed by conservatives online after two pro-Donald Trump slogans decorated in the parking lot were forcibly removed.

Keller High School’s senior students hold an annual tradition of painting murals in their parking spots. Two students, who have not been named, each opted to paint messages of support for the former president.

One mural featured Trump donning sunglasses and a bandanna, while another simply read 45/47 in reference to the Republican’s previous and possible next term as president.

In a since deleted policy, Keller maintained “the right to paint over, confiscate, and re-sell spaces that include content determined to be inappropriate by the administration, including but not limited to controversial, offensive, or obscene material.”

However, the Keller Independent School District later changed course. On Wednesday, July 31, Dr. Charles Randklev, the school board’s president, issued a statement on Facebook.

“You may have heard about a parking lot controversy at Keller High School where students were required to paint over the parking spots in the attached photo,” he wrote on the social media platform.

“Let me be clear. There is nothing offensive or controversial about respectfully painting or honoring a current or former President for the United States of America. We will take action and make it clear that the students can honor President Trump as the 45th, and soon-to-be 47th President of the United States, as they wish.”

Conservative backlash spread quickly when news of the removal was shared – which helped lead to the reversal.

Others alleged the move was unconstitutional.

And they were right.

Latest

Overwhelmingly Pro-Biden District Rallies Against Migrant Crime

Residents in Clinton Hill, NY, rallied after a surge in violence in the district linked to migrant crime.

The rally took place close to a major migrant center in Brooklyn, with one protester saying the area “was not available to the community anymore” since the trouble started:

“We have been witnessing the escalation in violence for months now,” one resident said.

“We’ve been pleading with the mayor as we’ve seen increased violence that this was going to be inevitable,” another said.

With President Joe Biden coming under heavy fire for his open door border policy, many wondered who the residents of Clinton Hill voted for in the last election.

It wasn’t long before the answer was discovered…. and it’s above 90%. For comparison, Trump got a greater share of the vote in San Francisco.

The district – perhaps unsurprising given its name – is one of the strongest Democrat-leaning areas of the country, and sympathy was suspended among users on social media, who recognized that these people are complaining about the results of their own actions.

One can reasonably imagine that every single one of them was against Trump’s wall and other border policies.

However, another user warned that the recent unrest was unlikely to result in a switch to the right.

After all, liberals have been voting for their own destruction for a century and don’t seem to have put 2 and 2 together.

Media

Associated Press Contradicts Own Reporting Amid Kamala Harris Ethnicity Row

Since her effective confirmation as the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee, the mainstream media has sought to eradicate previous claims and attacks against Vice President Kamala Harris.

Media outlets have deleted previous reporting on Harris’ left-wing views, descriptions of her as a “border czar” while Politico claimed her anti-fracking stance was an “allegation”.

On Wednesday, July 31, the Associated Press became the latest outlet to attempt to alter history when reporting on Donald Trump’s appearance before the National Association of Black Journalists in Chicago.

After a question regarding whether the Republican candidate believed Harris was the Democratic nominee “because she is a Black woman,” Trump said he “didn’t know” she was Black due to her previous ethnicity claims.

“She was always of Indian heritage, and she was only promoting Indian heritage,” Trump responded. “I didn’t know she was Black until a number of years ago when she happened to turn Black.”

“Now she wants to be known as Black,” Trump continued before adding that his presidential rival “obviously doesn’t” respect either race due to her conflicting claims.

Watch his comments below:

The Associated Press claimed the former president “falsely suggested” Harris had misled voters over her race.

However, social media users were quick to find evidence to the contrary.

So poor was the Associated Press’ argument that a guy who goes by the name “Catturd” was able to refute it.

And everyone else could see through their BS too.

Others agreed with Trump’s comments.

Harris is trying to claw back Black American voters who may be tempted by a second Trump presidency. Although not the largest demographic of the American electorate, many Black voters live in highly populated swing states, thus making them crucial in the race for the White House.

Media

Michael Malice Perfectly Explains Why Kamala Harris Is America’s Wine Mom

Kamala Harris’ has previously been described as “America’s wine mom”, and prominent political commentator Michael Malice hilariously broke that down on the Joe Rogan Experience at the end of July.

Malice, who was born in Lviv, Ukraine, began his point with a throwback to the Vice President’s infamous, highly detailed breakdown of Vladimir Putin’s invasion of the Eastern European country. “She once said, ‘Ukraine is a country in Europe. It exists next to another country called Russia. Russia is a bigger country. Russia is a powerful country. Russia decided to invade a smaller country called Ukraine. So basically, that’s wrong.’”

“I think of her as America’s wine mom,” Malice told Rogan, adding that Harris has the “three phases” of wine mom; happy drunk, drunk at work [sic], and “I’m being stern, so you don’t realize how plastered I am” drunk, all of which he breaks down with quotes from Harris.

Give it a watch – and prepare to laugh… a lot:

Users on social media platform X adored the comparison.

Another gave a good example of his point.

Moreover, one user profoundly agreed with it!

Woke

Elon Musk Accepts Fight Against Nicolás Maduro Amid Claims Of Venezuelan Election Fraud

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has challenged Elon Musk to a physical fight after the X CEO accused him of election fraud.

Following the disputed presidential election in Venezuela, where Maduro was declared the winner with 51% of the vote despite claims of falsified results, Musk slammed the socialist leader, accusing him of “major election fraud.”

“Maduro, leave! Venezuelans chose to end the communist dictatorship of Nicolas Maduro. The data announce a crushing victory of the opposition, and the world is waiting for you to recognize the defeat after years of socialism, misery, decadence and death,” Musk wrote on his own “X” platform.

And there’s plenty of evidence for what Musk is saying – such as the fact that the votes share tallies add up to over 109%.

On national television, Maduro accused the Tesla owner of “controlling a virtual reality”, and added, “You want to fight? Let’s have it, Elon Musk. I’m ready.”

Musk later accepted the challenge in belief that the Venezuelan President will “chicken out.”

Many on social media expressed disbelief at the absurdity of the situation.

Others predicted a victory for the business magnate.

Who do you think would win? Let us know in the comments.


Scroll to Top