Author name: RVM News

Scott Jennings Drops Hilarious Bomb on CNN Over Democrat White House Meltdown [WATCH]
News

Scott Jennings Drops Hilarious Bomb on CNN Over Democrat White House Meltdown [WATCH]

/

CNN viewers got an unexpected comedy gem this week when conservative commentator Scott Jennings dropped one of the funniest one-liners of the year.

The exchange took place during a segment where Democrats and their allies in the media were clutching their pearls over the planned UFC fight at the White House.

Apparently, Democrats cannot handle the idea of a popular, blue-collar sporting event coming to a venue they think belongs only to cocktail receptions and woke lectures.

Abby Phillip on CNN tried to turn the UFC event into some apocalyptic scandal.

She cited a filing that claimed the event would cost more than sixty million dollars, involve several agencies, and require massive coordination.

It was the sort of breathless panic that could only come from people who have no idea how logistics or large events work.

Jennings did what conservatives have to do every single day on liberal networks.

He kept his cool, waited for the nonsense to pile up, and then hit back with pure comedic timing.

When Phillip lamented that four hundred ninety-four porta-potties had been ordered for the crowd, Jennings fired back that somewhere Graham Platner must be booking a flight.

The panel broke, and conservative viewers across America did too.

To understand the joke, you have to know who Platner is.

He’s the guy whose old Reddit posts described, in some shockingly gross detail, a rather strange habit involving porta-potties.

When Jennings dropped the punchline, he didn’t even have to explain it.

The humor needed no help.

CNN quickly moved on, but social media did not.

WATCH:

Liberal Twitter exploded with fury, proving again that leftists cannot take a joke.

Conservatives, meanwhile, shared the clip over and over, calling it one of the best moments on CNN in months.

That is not a high bar, of course, but Jennings delivered exactly what so many viewers have been missing.

He brought humor, reality, and a dose of courage into a network that usually treats conservatives like intruders at a country club.

The meltdown over this White House UFC event has been astonishing.

Democrats have complained about costs, decorum, legalities, and optics.

In other words, they are mad that regular Americans might actually enjoy something connected to the presidency.

They did not seem to mind when the Biden White House spent taxpayer money on a pride event that ended with activists flashing the lawn cameras.

When liberals do it, it is called inclusivity. When conservatives plan a sporting event, it suddenly becomes a constitutional crisis.

Jennings’ joke struck a nerve because it exposed how ridiculous the reaction has been.

The UFC event is a private partnership largely funded away from taxpayer dollars.

It is expected to draw massive enthusiasm and bring regular Americans into a national celebration.

Yet, because Trump is associated with it, the left insists it must be evil.

This uproar shows how far the progressive movement has drifted from the everyday American experience.

Millions of people enjoy combat sports and see athletes as role models of grit and discipline.

The White House hosting such an event should be seen as unifying, but Democrats only see it as something to attack.

They hate anything that does not fit their narrative of elitist control and cultural domination.

Even more telling is how the media jumped on the bandwagon instead of asking serious questions.

CNN spent more time dissecting porta-potty logistics than discussing the potential benefits of national unity and public interest.

Jennings’ quick wit turned that absurdity back on them and reminded viewers why people are leaving liberal media in droves.

The beauty of his comment is that it showed humor can still punch through propaganda.

Conservatives do not have to shout to make a point when the truth is funny enough on its own.

He poked fun at a ridiculous controversy and reminded everyone that laughter is sometimes the best political weapon.

Liberals hate that because humor has a way of stripping away pretension and exposing the empty outrage that drives so much of their messaging.

At a time when the country is recovering from years of political exhaustion, moments like this offer a bit of relief. Jennings’ one-liner wasn’t just funny; it was a cultural microcosm.

It reminded conservatives that our opponents are not unbeatable.

They are just humorless bureaucrats trying to control what Americans can enjoy.

The next time Abby Phillip or any CNN anchor tries to sell outrage over something harmless, conservatives can remember Scott Jennings’ deadpan timing and smile.

While Democrats drown in their own sanctimony, we might as well laugh all the way to the ballot box.

Dan Bongino Nukes Tucker Carlson’s ‘Secret Texts’ Claim: “I’ve Got Receipts, He’s Got Fairy Tales” [WATCH]
News

Dan Bongino Nukes Tucker Carlson’s ‘Secret Texts’ Claim: “I’ve Got Receipts, He’s Got Fairy Tales” [WATCH]

/

Things got heated in conservative media circles after Tucker Carlson leveled a shocking accusation involving President Donald Trump and the FBI.

Carlson alleged that Trump personally ordered the Bureau to halt its investigation into Thomas Crooks, the man accused of attempting to assassinate him in 2024.

The claim came during Carlson’s interview with Mario Nawal, a Lebanese Australian entrepreneur and popular podcast host.

WATCH:

What followed was a rapid and fiery rebuttal from former FBI Deputy Director and conservative commentator Dan Bongino, who ripped Carlson’s story apart and made sure to do it loudly.

According to Carlson, he pressed Bongino late last year about inconsistencies in the FBI’s investigation into Crooks, including what Carlson called false information about the suspect’s nonexistent online presence.

Carlson claimed that after some back and forth, Bongino became emotional and blurted, “Take it up with Trump, he’s the one who shut down the investigation.”

Carlson said the remark stunned him and that he found no reasonable explanation for why Trump would stop an inquiry into his own attempted assassination.

The statement sent shockwaves through the conservative base and predictably set social media ablaze.

It also raised eyebrows among political commentators wondering why Carlson would launch such a grenade toward a former ally like Bongino, especially on a matter as serious as a presidential assassination attempt.

True to form, Bongino wasted no time setting the record straight in his blunt and unfiltered style.

On Friday, Bongino fired back on X, rejecting every part of Carlson’s claim as pure fiction.

He labeled Carlson a “lying nepo baby,” adding that the former Fox host is “like Teddy Ruxpin, you put a coin in his back and he tells you a story.”

WATCH:

The jab echoed Bongino’s signature no-nonsense approach and his reputation for responding to criticism head on, without sugarcoating.

The clash between two of the most recognizable conservative media figures has turned into a headline-grabbing feud.

Many on the right quickly sided with Bongino, who has built his reputation as a truth-teller and a fighter against swamp politics.

They questioned why Carlson, who has made a career blasting the establishment and exposing government corruption, would suddenly turn on a former FBI official who stood by Trump through years of deep state sabotage.

The timing of Carlson’s remarks also drew skepticism.

The assassination attempt on Trump remains under heavy scrutiny, especially after new evidence surfaced showing contact between Crooks and a local sheriff’s deputy.

The revelation fueled more questions about possible failures by law enforcement agencies, not about Trump’s decisions.

To some conservatives, Carlson’s version of events sounded more like a conspiracy twist than investigative journalism.

For Bongino, the accusation cut deep.

As a former Secret Service agent who once protected presidents, any suggestion that he helped cover up a federal investigation involving a sitting president’s safety would strike at the core of his credibility.

Those who follow his work know that Bongino has been an outspoken critic of the FBI’s politicization, often pointing to how the agency targeted Trump allies while protecting Democrats.

To suggest he suddenly defended some backroom decision by Trump to end an investigation sounded absurd to his supporters.

Carlson, meanwhile, appears to be leaning into his outsider persona more than ever.

Since parting ways with Fox News, his interviews and commentaries have taken on a more conspiratorial edge, focusing on government secrecy and alleged corruption on all sides.

While that style appeals to some viewers, others believe he has become reckless, pushing questionable stories that alienate the very base that once admired him.

Bongino’s takedown came across as more personal than political.

His description of Carlson as a mechanical storyteller fed by attention captured the frustration of conservatives who still remember when the two were part of the same media network pushing back against liberal narratives.

Now, with Carlson chasing shock value and Bongino doubling down on loyalty to truth and integrity, the split shows just how fragmented the conservative media landscape has become.

What remains unclear is whether Carlson will stand by his story or soften his claim under pressure.

As of now, he has not provided any recording, document, or source to back up the claim that Bongino ever said Trump halted the FBI probe.

Absent evidence, it looks like another high-profile personality feud rather than a credible revelation.

Trump himself has not publicly commented on Carlson’s claim.

His allies, however, are dismissing it as nonsense, arguing that Trump would have no reason to obstruct an investigation into an attempt on his own life. The accusation, they say, is as illogical as it is inflammatory.

Both men have carved distinct paths in conservative media. Bongino prioritizes loyalty and straight talk.

Carlson prefers skepticism and headline drama.

This latest clash highlights that even within the right, personal rivalries and differing approaches to truth-telling can spark serious tension.

For everyday conservatives who tune in looking for solid information, the spat might be little more than a distraction from bigger issues.

But for Bongino, accusing him of selling out a sitting president is no small thing. He was not about to let it slide, and his sharp response made that perfectly clear.

Jasmine Crockett Sparks Backlash After Insane Comments on Karmelo Anthony Case [WATCH]
News

Jasmine Crockett Sparks Backlash After Insane Comments on Karmelo Anthony Case [WATCH]

/

Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas is facing criticism after comments she made on her podcast about the murder case involving Karmelo Anthony and 17-year-old Austin Metcalf, as reported by The New York Post.

During a June 10 episode of her podcast, “Clock It with Crockett,” the congresswoman discussed Anthony’s recent conviction for first-degree murder in the fatal stabbing of Metcalf at a high school track meet in Frisco, Texas.

Anthony, now 19, was convicted by a Collin County jury and sentenced to 35 years in prison.

While discussing the case, Crockett questioned the nature of the weapon used in the attack and made several claims about the confrontation that differed from testimony presented during the trial.

“Wait a minute, it was this?” Crockett said while holding her thumb and forefinger close together to demonstrate what she believed was the size of the knife.

“Was it a switch? I don’t know what he had,” she added.

One guest on the podcast described the knife as “a multi-tool” similar to a Swiss Army knife.

“Yeah, like with the little scissors and everything and whatever. So it was small,” Crockett responded.

“Well, I would argue the size of it alone, you wouldn’t even think it’s a deadly weapon.”

According to trial testimony, the knife used by Anthony was described as a semi-serrated pocket knife with one-handed opening capability and a sharp point.

Prosecutors said the blade penetrated Metcalf’s sternum and entered his heart during the confrontation.

The incident occurred in April 2025 during a track meet at Memorial High School in Frisco. Witnesses testified that Metcalf approached Anthony after finding him inside a tent designated for members of the track team.

Eddie Parra, an 18-year-old witness, testified that Anthony became confrontational when asked to leave. According to testimony, Anthony allegedly told Metcalf to “touch me” and stated, “you’re going to have to move me,” while indicating he had a weapon.

Witnesses testified that Metcalf shoved Anthony before Anthony pulled out the knife and stabbed him in the chest. During the trial, Collin County District Attorney Bill Wirskye described the attack as a “sneak attack.”

Crockett also described a scenario that drew attention online.

“If a 300-pound man is beating me, like on top of me and beating me down, I’m not limited to fists,” she said.

Crockett also stated, “One time, 2 inches. He didn’t stab him 5, 6, 7 times…”

Trial testimony did not describe such circumstances. Metcalf was reported to be approximately 6 feet tall and 200 pounds. Anthony, a high school football player at the time, was listed at 5 feet 11 inches and 162 pounds.

Witness accounts presented during the trial indicated there was no prolonged physical altercation before the stabbing. Testimony stated that Metcalf was not on top of Anthony and that no beating occurred before the knife was used.

Following the circulation of clips from Crockett’s podcast on social media, users criticized her characterization of the case.

“Why does it matter what he used to kill him? A rope isn’t a deadly weapon until it’s used to strangle someone. Like how stupid can you be?” one user wrote.

“Pretty sure Metcalf is dead, so it sounds like a deadly weapon to me,” another commenter posted.

A third user wrote, “So she has twisted this story into something that did not happen. She’s an absolute imbecile. She should have at least googled what happened before she opened her dumb mouth!”

The comments added to the ongoing public debate surrounding the case, which attracted national attention and generated extensive discussion online throughout the trial and sentencing phases.

Anthony’s defense team has indicated plans to appeal the conviction.

The guilty verdict was reached after a Collin County jury composed of white, Asian, and Hispanic jurors deliberated for roughly three hours before finding Anthony guilty of first-degree murder.

He was subsequently sentenced to 35 years in prison.

According to reports, Crockett did not respond to requests for comment regarding her podcast remarks.

Dem Rep Warns Black Voters Will Quit Elections Without Massive Reparations Payouts [WATCH]
News

Dem Rep Warns Black Voters Will Quit Elections Without Massive Reparations Payouts [WATCH]

/

Rep. Summer Lee, D-Pa., is renewing her push for reparations legislation while arguing that continued opposition to such proposals could discourage political participation among some Black Americans, as reported by The New York Post.

The Pennsylvania congresswoman made the comments during an appearance on “The Native Land Pod,” where she discussed reparations, political engagement, and the prospects for legislation aimed at addressing the historical legacy of slavery in the United States.

During the interview, Lee criticized what she described as efforts by political opponents to undermine support for reparations and said she believes such efforts are intended to reduce participation in the political process.

“And that’s what they do,” Lee said.

“Because, again, they’re trying to disenfranchise you. Because if you believe that you’re never going to get reparations from this system, then you tap out, and you don’t just tap out of the conversation, you tap out of the system. You don’t want to vote anymore. You don’t participate anymore.”

Lee continued by arguing that political participation remains important regardless of whether reparations legislation advances.

“And they know that that’s how they don’t control Congress,” Lee added.

“That’s how you can get your school boards, your board of supervisors. They want us that far out of this system. So right now, we fight for reparations because it’s owed us. It is owed us, so we’re not going to back down on that one way or another.”

The comments came as Lee continues advocating for a federal reparations proposal she reintroduced in May.

The legislation seeks to establish a framework for providing federal resources to descendants of enslaved people brought to the United States from Africa.

The effort follows a similar proposal introduced during the previous Congress by former Missouri Rep. Cori Bush.

Bush’s proposal, introduced in May 2023, called for $14 trillion in reparations-related payments and programs for descendants of slavery. The measure did not advance in Congress.

During her interview, Lee acknowledged that support for reparations remains limited, including among members of her own party.

“I’m not shocked that my colleagues are not on it, that Democratic colleagues aren’t on it,” Lee said.

“Again, there is a level of comfort in this building that sustains people. And I know that the people who don’t want reparations back a lot of my colleagues, Democrat and otherwise. So no, I’m not shocked, but it is why we have to keep people on the outside encouraged.”

The congresswoman also addressed criticism that the term “reparations” has become politically difficult for some elected officials to embrace.

Responding to a question about political resistance to the concept, Lee argued that lawmakers should be willing to support policies they believe are backed by evidence even when those positions are controversial.

“The reality is, is that the cowardice that liberals are able to show when it comes to all types of things that sound scary, but we know you have, you know, just data, evidence, empirical evidence behind it,” Lee said.

“And that comes with — that comes with police accountability, that comes with criminal legal reform, that comes with reparations, right?”

Lee also argued that political supporters should push elected officials to take stronger positions on controversial issues.

“We give liberals very often a pass to not be their most courageous selves,” she said.

“So whatever it is that we’re talking about, we have to create the conditions for them to be more courageous.”

The Pennsylvania lawmaker has previously acknowledged that reparations legislation faces significant political obstacles.

“We know there will be pushback,” Lee said when she reintroduced the proposal in May.

“Reparations are a proposal to level the playing field, but the only way we could ever have a level playing field is by remedying the harms that have been done by the system.”

Despite the challenges facing the proposal, Lee indicated this week that she intends to continue advocating for the measure and building support for reparations legislation in Congress.

The debate over reparations has remained a recurring issue in national politics, with supporters arguing the policy would address historical injustices and opponents raising concerns about cost, implementation, and eligibility.

For now, Lee’s proposal faces uncertain prospects on Capitol Hill as lawmakers continue debating the issue.

Anonymous Tip Triggers Major Mexico Search for Savannah Guthrie’s Missing Mother [WATCH]
News

Anonymous Tip Triggers Major Mexico Search for Savannah Guthrie’s Missing Mother [WATCH]

/

An anonymous tip claiming that missing Arizona woman Nancy Guthrie may have been buried in an unmarked grave in northern Mexico prompted a search operation this week, but investigators and volunteers did not locate any evidence connected to the case, as reported by the New York Post.

The search was conducted by Buscando Corazones Nogales, a volunteer organization that assists in locating missing persons in Mexico.

According to the group’s leader, Ramona Guadalupe Ayala Ortiz, the organization received an anonymous call on Wednesday alleging that Guthrie’s remains could be found in a remote area near the U.S.-Mexico border.

Guthrie, 84, disappeared from her home in Tucson, Arizona, on Feb. 1. Authorities believe she was abducted from her residence in the Catalina Foothills, and the investigation into her disappearance remains active.

No arrests have been announced, and investigators have not publicly identified any suspects.

According to Ayala Ortiz, the anonymous caller provided a specific location in an area known as Mariposa, northwest of Nogales, Sonora. The tipster allegedly claimed Guthrie had been buried in a grave located near a stream.

“We received an anonymous call telling us that the woman’s [Guthrie’s] remains were in the Mariposa area — in a grave over a stream,” Ayala Ortiz told the Mexican newspaper El Imparcial.

The information prompted volunteers and search personnel to travel to the area and conduct an initial search.

Mariposa has previously been the site of discoveries involving unmarked graves. Earlier this year, search teams working in the region located 25 such graves, making the latest tip significant enough to warrant further investigation.

During the operation, volunteers expanded their search deeper into the area than previous efforts. Despite the extensive examination of the terrain identified by the caller, no evidence connected to Guthrie was discovered.

Ayala Ortiz said the search did not produce any findings related to the missing Arizona woman.

Although the tip did not lead to a breakthrough, the organization indicated it intends to continue searching the region in future operations.

The effort was supported by the Sonora State Commission for the Search of Missing Persons, which assisted in coordinating resources for the operation.

Municipal and state authorities also provided security for volunteers and personnel participating in the search.

The case continues to attract attention on both sides of the border due to Guthrie’s connection to NBC “Today” co-host Savannah Guthrie.

Nancy Guthrie disappeared during the early morning hours of Feb. 1 from her Tucson-area residence, more than 70 miles north of Nogales.

Investigators have spent months pursuing leads and conducting searches, but authorities have released few details about the status of the investigation.

Law enforcement officials have previously stated they believe Guthrie was taken from her home, but no public announcements regarding arrests or major developments have followed.

The latest search illustrates how tips—both confirmed and unconfirmed—continue to generate investigative activity as authorities and volunteer groups seek answers in the case.

While the anonymous report ultimately did not lead to the discovery of Guthrie, search organizations involved in the effort said they remain committed to following credible leads and continuing operations aimed at locating missing persons throughout the region.

For now, the mystery surrounding Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance remains unresolved, and investigators continue urging anyone with information about her whereabouts to come forward.

Sixth Grade Boy Dies in School After Reported TikTok Challenge Goes Horribly Wrong
News

Sixth Grade Boy Dies in School After Reported TikTok Challenge Goes Horribly Wrong

/

A 12-year-old student died Wednesday after suffering a choking emergency inside a Yonkers, New York, middle school, prompting an ongoing police investigation into whether a social media challenge may have played a role in the incident, as reported by the New York Post.

The sixth-grade student became unresponsive at approximately 11:40 a.m. inside Justice Sonia Sotomayor Community School, according to Yonkers school officials.

Staff members and first responders immediately attempted life-saving measures before the boy was transported to St. Joseph’s Hospital. Despite those efforts, the student was later pronounced dead.

Authorities have not publicly released the child’s identity.

Investigators are now working to determine exactly what occurred in the moments leading up to the tragedy.

According to News 12, police are examining whether the incident may have been connected to the so-called “One Bite” challenge that has circulated on social media platforms.

The challenge reportedly involves participants attempting to consume large amounts of food in a single bite.

Officials emphasized that no conclusions have been reached and that investigators are continuing to gather information.

“Anything about a TikTok challenge, anything about witness statements, the events leading up to this we’re going to investigate, and we’re going to continue with the investigation from beginning to end,” Yonkers Police Commissioner Christopher Sapienza said during a news conference Thursday.

Reports indicated the student may have been eating a donut when the emergency occurred, though authorities have not confirmed that detail.

School officials said the incident did not occur inside the cafeteria.

Instead, Superintendent Anibal Soler Jr. said the student experienced the medical emergency in a fourth-floor hallway, where staff members immediately responded in an effort to dislodge the food from his throat.

As news of the tragedy spread throughout the school community, district leaders focused on providing support to students, faculty, and family members affected by the loss.

“As police investigate the nature of the medical emergency, we remain focused on caring for his classmates, teachers, and staff who are in terrible pain,” Soler said in a statement.

The superintendent also described the student as a well-known and beloved member of the school community.

“This young man was a bright light in the building,” Soler said.

“Everybody loved him, everybody knew him. He was energy, he was joy.”

The incident has renewed attention on the influence of social media trends involving young users, particularly those that may encourage risky behavior.

While investigators have not determined whether any online challenge contributed to the student’s death, authorities said every aspect of the case will be reviewed.

Yonkers Mayor Mike Spano also issued a statement expressing condolences to the family and the broader community.

“Today’s tragic loss is heartbreaking,” Spano said.

“The death of a child is every parent’s worst nightmare, and our entire Yonkers community is grieving alongside this student’s family, classmates, teachers, and loved ones.”

The investigation remains active as police continue interviewing witnesses and reviewing available evidence. Authorities have not announced a timeline for completing the investigation or releasing additional findings.

For now, school officials say their focus remains on helping students and staff cope with the loss while law enforcement works to determine the circumstances surrounding the sixth-grader’s death.

The tragedy has left classmates, educators, and parents searching for answers as the Yonkers community mourns the loss of a young student whose life ended unexpectedly during the school day.

Portland Protester Who Smashed ICE Officer With Rock Gets Sentenced [WATCH]
News

Portland Protester Who Smashed ICE Officer With Rock Gets Sentenced [WATCH]

/

A Portland man who admitted to assaulting a federal immigration officer during a protest outside a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility has been sentenced to 30 months in federal prison, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Oregon, as reported by The New York Post.

Robert Jacob Hoopes received the sentence on Thursday after previously pleading guilty to aggravated assault of a federal employee with a dangerous weapon stemming from a June 2025 protest in Portland, Oregon.

Federal prosecutors said Hoopes threw a rock that struck an ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations officer in the face during demonstrations outside the facility. Court records indicate the impact caused a significant injury that required medical treatment.

According to prosecutors, the officer suffered a wound that bled heavily and temporarily obstructed his vision. Authorities said the injury required care beyond standard first aid.

The sentence includes 30 months in federal prison, three years of supervised release following incarceration, and more than $8,000 in restitution.

U.S. Attorney Scott Bradford said the case demonstrates the consequences of violence directed at law enforcement officers during protests.

“Today’s message is clear — violence is not a protest,” Bradford said in a statement.

“When you cross the line and assault a federal officer, you will be prosecuted.”

The case drew attention because of the investigative methods used to identify Hoopes.

According to charging documents, FBI investigators relied in part on facial recognition technology after reviewing photographs published online following the protest.

Federal authorities said investigators submitted an image published by OregonLive.com into commercially available facial recognition software. The software reportedly produced approximately 30 potential matches from publicly available databases.

Investigators then manually reviewed those results and focused on a photograph posted on a Reed College SmugMug page titled “Canyon Day April ’23.”

According to prosecutors, a tattoo visible on the individual in that photograph matched a tattoo seen on the suspect during the protest.

That comparison helped investigators identify Hoopes as the individual accused of throwing the rock.

The case has generated discussion because Hoopes’ family publicly described him as someone committed to nonviolence.

In comments previously reported by KATU, Hoopes’ father, Tom Hoopes, described his son as a “lifelong Quaker who is deeply committed to pacifism.”

While acknowledging that his son attended the protest, he declined to discuss the specifics of the allegations at the time.

“What his involvement was: I can’t speak to that, but he is deeply committed to justice,” Tom Hoopes told the outlet.

The sentencing comes as the Justice Department continues pursuing cases involving attacks on federal officers during demonstrations connected to immigration enforcement policies.

Federal prosecutors have repeatedly emphasized that individuals who engage in violence during protests can face criminal charges regardless of the political cause being advocated.

The case also arrives amid continued clashes at immigration-related facilities in other parts of the country.

More recently, demonstrations outside Delaney Hall, an immigration detention center in Newark, New Jersey, have resulted in multiple confrontations between protesters and law enforcement officers.

Authorities have reported dozens of arrests connected to those incidents.

Federal officials have stated that while peaceful protest remains protected under the law, assaults on law enforcement officers will continue to be prosecuted through the federal court system.

The sentencing of Hoopes marks one of the latest cases arising from protests targeting ICE operations during President Donald Trump’s administration.

Gavin Newsom Teases Hunter Biden Presidential Run During Podcast Interview [WATCH]
News

Gavin Newsom Teases Hunter Biden Presidential Run During Podcast Interview [WATCH]

/

Hunter Biden made a joking reference to a future political campaign during a recent appearance on California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s podcast, adding another headline-generating moment to a conversation that touched on politics, media attention, and Biden’s public profile, as reported by The New York Post.

Newsom released a preview of the latest episode of his podcast, “This Is Gavin Newsom,” featuring Hunter Biden, the son of former President Joe Biden.

In a teaser shared on social media, Newsom introduced his guest by jokingly referring to him as “Presidential candidate Hunter Biden.”

Biden quickly played along with the remark.

“Here’s the deal. I’ll run, but only as your VP,” Biden responded.

The exchange drew attention online as speculation continues regarding Newsom’s political future and the possibility of a 2028 presidential campaign.

Newsom, who has repeatedly faced questions about a potential White House bid, used the podcast appearance to discuss politics and current events with Biden.

According to video clips from the interview, Biden joked that the vice president’s residence “is a lot cooler” than the White House.

The conversation also referenced comments President Donald Trump recently made about Hunter Biden.

Trump had suggested Biden “could do well” in a hypothetical 2028 presidential race while making remarks related to Maine Democratic Senate nominee Graham Platner.

“I had to give you a break for just one day,” Biden joked to Newsom, referring to the constant speculation surrounding the governor’s political ambitions.

During the interview, Biden suggested he intends to remain active in public discussions.

“They gave me a stage, and I’m going to use it,” he said.

According to reports, Biden also discussed several political figures and public personalities with whom he has disagreed, including Tucker Carlson and President Trump.

The interview reportedly included a discussion of Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner, who has faced scrutiny over allegations involving past personal relationships and controversy surrounding a tattoo that became a campaign issue.

Biden argued that many Americans would struggle to pass what he described as a “show me your phone” test if every private communication were examined publicly.

“If that’s the standard by which we are going to judge people, particularly people in elected office,” Biden said, according to reports from the interview.

The podcast teaser generated a wide range of reactions online.

Critics questioned Newsom’s decision to feature Biden as a guest, while supporters argued that the appearance provided an opportunity to hear from a figure who has remained largely out of the public spotlight since his father left office.

In recent months, Biden has become more active on social media as he marks seven years of sobriety. Since returning to public platforms earlier this year, he has posted commentary about politics, media coverage, and aspects of his personal journey.

Biden’s legal issues have remained part of the public discussion surrounding him. In 2024, he was convicted of making false statements related to drug use on a firearm purchase form.

He also faced federal tax-related allegations. Former President Joe Biden later issued a pardon covering those matters near the end of his presidency.

Some of Biden’s recent social media activity has focused on political issues, including criticism of media figures and commentary on public policy matters.

The podcast appearance also reflects Newsom’s broader effort to expand the reach of his show.

The California governor has hosted guests from across the political spectrum, including conservative commentators and political figures, generating both praise and criticism from different corners of the political world.

Newsom has previously described the podcast as a personal project aimed at exposing himself to different viewpoints.

“I’m doing this selfishly because I want to learn. I want to get better in life, not just politics. And if I’m better in life, I’ll be better in politics,” Newsom told Politico.

With Newsom continuing to build his national profile and Hunter Biden returning more frequently to public conversations, the interview quickly became one of the most discussed political podcast appearances of the week.

Miracle in the Mud: Two ATVers Rescue Missing Woman After Three Days Trapped in Minnesota Wilderness
News

Miracle in the Mud: Two ATVers Rescue Missing Woman After Three Days Trapped in Minnesota Wilderness

/

A routine ATV ride through remote trails in northern Minnesota turned into a life-saving rescue after two longtime friends discovered a missing woman trapped in mud and water three days after she disappeared, as reported by The New York Post.

Adam Sandbeck and Mike Gravalin, who have spent decades exploring trails together, set out Saturday for what they expected would be a normal off-road ride.

The pair had originally planned to participate in an organized ATV run connected to a local bar, but after realizing they had mixed up the event date, they decided to explore unfamiliar trails instead.

That decision ultimately led them to 68-year-old Kathryn Woessner, who had been missing for three days and was the subject of an active search.

According to Sandbeck, the two men were traveling roughly 30 miles from their preferred RV park when they realized their ATV was running low on fuel.

Looking for a shortcut, they headed down a rough trail filled with potholes and soon came across a stranded minivan.

Gravalin, a retired deputy U.S. marshal, immediately felt something was wrong.

Initially, he suspected the vehicle might be part of an ambush or some other unusual situation. As the two men looked around the area, they spotted what appeared to be a body partially submerged in water and mud.

“I just remember saying to myself, ‘Oh my God, please don’t be a dead person.’ She was completely submerged,” Sandbeck recalled.

“The water was almost coming over her mouth,” Gravalin added.

As they approached, they heard the woman quietly say, “Help me.”

The two friends immediately sprang into action and called 911 while attempting to gather information from the woman, who was weak and struggling after days trapped in the elements.

According to the woman, she had stepped out of her minivan several days earlier and became stuck in what the men described as quicksand-like mud. Unable to free herself, she remained trapped as water levels gradually rose around her.

For three days, she endured exposure to the elements while waiting for help.

By the time rescuers arrived, Woessner was suffering from dehydration and significant sun exposure. The only relief from the heat reportedly came during overnight storms, though the rainfall also caused the surrounding water and mud to rise.

“I mean, this has got to be one of the strongest women there is … You think about her just watching the sunset, the sun up and burning every day in the sun, and she still had the will to live,” Gravalin said.

Sandbeck and Gravalin remained with the woman while emergency personnel and volunteer firefighters worked to provide aid.

During the rescue effort, the men overheard responders discussing the possibility that the woman was Kathryn Woessner, a missing 68-year-old local resident who had vanished three days earlier.

The Douglas County Sheriff’s Office later confirmed that the rescued woman was indeed Woessner.

Authorities had previously classified her as an endangered missing person due to unspecified medical conditions.

Following the rescue, Woessner was transported to a local hospital for treatment. According to Sandbeck, she was reunited with her family by Sunday.

Reflecting on the unexpected chain of events that led to the discovery, Sandbeck said the experience reinforced his belief that circumstances often unfold for a reason.

“Never be annoyed at your situation, because everything happens for a reason,” he said.

What began as a mistaken trip date and a search for new trails ultimately resulted in the rescue of a missing woman whose survival amazed both her rescuers and first responders.

Platner Senate Campaign Implodes as Another Woman Goes Public With Explosive Claims
News

Platner Senate Campaign Implodes as Another Woman Goes Public With Explosive Claims

/

A new social media statement from a woman claiming to have previously dated Maine Democratic Senate nominee Graham Platner has added to the scrutiny surrounding the candidate’s campaign as he prepares to challenge Republican Sen. Susan Collins in one of the country’s most closely watched Senate races.

The allegations surfaced one day after Platner secured the Democratic nomination in Maine. The woman, who posts under the X handle “420mercymain69,” published a lengthy statement describing what she said was a brief relationship with Platner in 2021.

In the post, the woman alleged that she met Platner through the Tinder dating app and later experienced what she described as dishonesty and manipulation during their relationship.

Platner Melts Down After Fetterman Dares Him To Release His Own Texts

“I am stepping forward as a person who has experienced lying and manipulation by his hand to lend my voice to what is a growing number of women who have been wronged by this man in one way or another,” she wrote.

The woman said she was initially drawn to Platner’s profile because he was “hot and he was a leftist.”

Fox News Digital reported that it was unable to independently verify the claims contained in the post.

Several of the allegations focused on explanations Platner allegedly gave regarding a tattoo that has become a subject of controversy during the campaign.

The tattoo reportedly featured a Totenkopf symbol, which was used by Nazi SS units during World War II.

According to the woman’s account, Platner offered an explanation for the tattoo during their relationship that differed from the explanation he later provided publicly.

“A sob story of monumental proportions that only further solidified my perception of his ideology,” she wrote.

“But surprisingly enough not the one he gave to the people of Maine,” she continued.

“And I do mean genuinely surprising because from the moment he announced his campaign, that is exactly what I expected to hear when the truth inevitably came out.”

When questions about the tattoo surfaced publicly last year, Platner said he was unaware of its Nazi associations when he obtained it.

Responding to the latest allegations, a campaign spokesperson defended the candidate’s previous explanation.

“Graham’s repeatedly said he picked a skull-and-crossbones tattoo off a wall in Croatia to commemorate surviving Ramadi and his friends who were killed there,” the spokesperson told Fox News.

“Graham has also since covered up the tattoo and answered countless questions about it.”

The campaign also sought to contrast Platner with Collins, who is seeking another term in the Senate.

The woman’s social media post included additional allegations regarding Platner’s personal relationships. She claimed she learned from mutual acquaintances that he had allegedly been involved with other women while dating her.

Among the allegations, she said she later discovered Platner had allegedly been engaged to another woman when they first began speaking. She also claimed mutual friends informed her of additional relationships.

Fox News Digital reported it could not independently confirm those claims.

In her post, the woman said her intention was not to derail the campaign but to share her personal experiences and concerns.

“There will be more information that comes out,” she wrote.

“If I were a Maine voter seeing the things I’m seeing, I wouldn’t have voted for him, personal experience notwithstanding, because I do not trust him. Why, after all that has come out, would I?”

She concluded by criticizing what she viewed as dismissive reactions to allegations involving women.

“People that I have admired are brushing this off, discounting women’s experiences, attacking other journalists, or allowing people in their comment sections to do so. Especially with regard to domestic violence. It is hideous,” she wrote.

The latest allegations arrive as the Maine Senate race continues to attract national attention. Platner is set to face Collins in the general election, with both parties viewing the seat as potentially important in the battle for Senate control.

At this stage, the claims contained in the social media post remain allegations, and no independent verification has been publicly presented by law enforcement or other official sources.


Scroll to Top