Author name: RVM News

Liberal Historian Loses It, Claims White House UFC Event Mirrors Lynching Era [WATCH]
News

Liberal Historian Loses It, Claims White House UFC Event Mirrors Lynching Era [WATCH]

/

Historian and Substack writer Heather Cox Richardson is drawing attention following comments she made during a recent discussion with former CNN anchor Jim Acosta in which she compared a planned UFC event at the White House to the history of lynching in the United States, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

The remarks came during a conversation about President Donald Trump and a proposed UFC Freedom 250 event expected to be held on the White House grounds as part of the nation’s upcoming 250th anniversary celebrations.

Richardson, who has built a large following through her writings and commentary on American politics and history, argued that there was a connection between the cultural appeal of the UFC event and historical acts of mob violence.

During the discussion, Richardson said:

“It’s not really a stretch to say that the same impulse that created the UFC fight on the white House lawn is the impulse that really pushed lynching in the late 19th century.”

Video clips of the remarks circulated online and quickly generated reactions from political commentators and social media users across the ideological spectrum.

The comments also renewed attention on Richardson’s previous political observations.

Last month, she drew notice after discussing Republican political tactics and suggesting that members of the GOP often accuse opponents of actions they themselves are allegedly engaged in.

During that discussion, she also referenced Nazi-era political methods.

Richardson is one of the most widely followed political writers on the Substack platform, where she regularly publishes commentary on current events, history, and American politics.

Her newsletter reaches a large audience and frequently influences discussions among progressive activists and Democratic voters.

The UFC Freedom 250 event has attracted national attention since details about the proposed celebration became public.

Supporters have described the event as a high-profile addition to America’s semiquincentennial festivities, while critics have questioned the appropriateness of holding a mixed martial arts competition on White House grounds.

Richardson’s comparison between the UFC event and historical lynchings immediately became the focus of debate.

Critics argued that the comparison was inappropriate and historically unsupported, while supporters of Richardson defended her broader argument regarding public spectacles and political culture.

The discussion highlights the increasingly sharp disagreements surrounding cultural and political events associated with the Trump administration.

Public figures from both the left and right have frequently used historical comparisons to frame contemporary political debates, often drawing strong reactions from opponents.

Acosta, who hosted the discussion with Richardson, has remained a frequent commentator on national politics since his departure from CNN.

The exchange gained wider visibility after clips were shared on social media platforms and discussed by political commentators.

As reactions continue online, Richardson’s remarks have become another flashpoint in the ongoing debate over the role of political rhetoric, historical analogies, and public events tied to the White House and the Trump administration.

The video of the discussion remains widely available online and continues to generate responses from both supporters and critics of Richardson’s comments.

CNN’s Harry Enten Breaks Down New Midterm Warning for Democrats [WATCH]
News

CNN’s Harry Enten Breaks Down New Midterm Warning for Democrats [WATCH]

/

New polling data highlighted by CNN senior data analyst Harry Enten suggests Democrats may not be performing at the levels historically associated with major midterm election waves, despite holding an advantage in generic congressional ballot polling, as reported by Red State.

During a segment aired Monday, Enten reviewed several recent surveys and compared current Democratic margins with those recorded before previous election cycles that resulted in significant gains for the party out of power.

Historically, the party not controlling the White House has often enjoyed strong polling advantages heading into midterm elections.

Democrats currently hold a lead in several generic congressional ballot surveys. Still, Enten argued that the size of that lead may be less impressive when measured against previous wave-election benchmarks.

According to Enten, recent polling from Ipsos, Marquette University Law School, and NBC News showed Democrats leading Republicans on the generic ballot, but by narrower margins than in past election cycles.

He noted that Democrats were “shy of their generic ballot benchmark in past wave years.”

Enten pointed to NBC News polling showing Democrats ahead by five percentage points in 2026. He compared that figure to the party’s position in 2018 and 2006, when Democrats held significantly larger advantages at similar points in the election cycle.

According to the analysis, the five-point lead recorded in the NBC poll is roughly half of the Democratic advantage seen in 2018 and less than half of the margin the party held in 2006.

Enten also noted that redistricting remains a factor that could influence the outcome of House races across the country.

Based on his calculations, Democrats may need a lead of approximately three to four points nationally to have a realistic path toward regaining control of the House of Representatives.

However, he observed that the average Democratic advantage across the Ipsos, Marquette University Law School, and NBC News polls currently stands at three points.

As a result, Enten suggested the numbers indicate a competitive environment rather than a guaranteed Democratic victory.

“Far from a guarantee,” Enten said.

The discussion also included political forecasting models. According to the segment, the Kalshi prediction market continued to favor Republicans in the battle for House control while also giving Republicans an advantage in the race for the Senate.

The polling analysis comes as both parties continue preparing for the 2026 midterm elections, which will determine control of Congress during the second half of President Donald Trump’s current term.

Control of the House remains a key political objective for Democrats, who hope to regain a congressional check on the Trump administration. Republicans, meanwhile, are seeking to defend their majority and expand their position in both chambers.

Election analysts have cautioned that polling conducted more than a year before Election Day can change significantly as campaigns develop, candidates emerge, fundraising intensifies, and national issues evolve.

Still, Enten’s review of the available data focused on one central point: while Democrats currently hold an advantage in generic ballot polling, the margins are smaller than those seen during previous election cycles that produced major congressional gains for the party out of power.

With more than a year remaining before voters cast ballots in the 2026 midterm elections, both parties will continue watching polling trends closely as they shape campaign strategies and target competitive districts across the country.

CNN Forced to Admit Democrat One Party Rule Turned California Into a Disaster Zone [WATCH]
News

CNN Forced to Admit Democrat One Party Rule Turned California Into a Disaster Zone [WATCH]

/

CNN host Fareed Zakaria used a recent broadcast to examine California’s political and economic challenges, arguing that years of one-party Democratic control have coincided with growing problems in housing, government spending, homelessness, and population loss, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

During his monologue, Zakaria pointed to recent election results and voter dissatisfaction as evidence that frustrations with the state’s direction are becoming increasingly difficult for Democrats to dismiss.

“At a time when President Trump and Republicans are faring poorly in most polls, the story has been different in California,” Zakaria said.

Zakaria noted that Republican candidate Steve Hilton advanced to the November gubernatorial election after finishing ahead of several well-funded Democratic candidates. Hilton is set to face Democrat Xavier Becerra in the general election.

He also highlighted the performance of Republican mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt in Los Angeles, one of the country’s most heavily Democratic cities.

“In Los Angeles, an overwhelmingly Democratic city, Spencer Pratt, a Republican, former reality television personality, looked as if he might make the mayoral general election before finishing third,” Zakaria said.

According to Zakaria, California Democrats risk overlooking a growing sense of dissatisfaction among voters if they dismiss such results as isolated political events.

“California Democrats will be tempted to dismiss all this as a sideshow, but the frustration is real and justified,” he said.

Zakaria contrasted California’s vast economic strengths with what he described as shortcomings in governance. He cited Silicon Valley, Hollywood, major ports, agriculture, universities, talent, and natural resources as examples of the state’s advantages.

“California is one of the most dynamic places on the planet. It has Silicon Valley, Hollywood, world-class universities, extraordinary agriculture, ports, talent, and natural beauty,” Zakaria said.

Despite those strengths, he argued that government performance has failed to keep pace.

“But it is a case study in how a rich society can spend more and more while producing less and less of what its ordinary citizens need,” he said.

“The paradox of California today is a successful economy attached to a failing model of governance.”

Zakaria devoted significant attention to the state’s fiscal growth over the last quarter-century.

He noted that California’s population has increased by approximately 15 percent since 2000, while general expenditures have increased by more than 200 percent during the same period.

According to the figures cited during the segment, state spending rose from $78 billion to approximately $248 billion. Spending per resident increased from roughly $2,300 to about $6,300, while the number of state employees grew by more than 50 percent.

“Does anyone think that the California government and its benefits have gotten 200 percent better in the last 25 years?” Zakaria asked.

Housing represented another major focus of the segment. Zakaria described the issue as California’s most significant policy failure and cited reporting from Alicia Finley of The Wall Street Journal.

According to the figures he referenced, the Los Angeles metropolitan area issued 118,000 building permits for new homes between 2021 and 2024 despite having nearly 13 million residents.

By comparison, Atlanta, with roughly half that population, issued 163,000 permits during the same period.

“California has made it too hard, slow, and expensive to build,” Zakaria said.

“The result is predictable. Home prices soar, rents rise, workers commute farther, homelessness grows, young people leave.”

Zakaria also pointed to migration trends as another warning sign.

“And people are leaving. Over the past seven years, the state has lost a net 1.9 million people through domestic migration.”

His comments come as California voters prepare for upcoming statewide and local elections, with housing affordability, homelessness, government spending, and population trends remaining central issues in political debates across the state.

JD Vance Details Trump’s Peace Deal with Iran: No, Trump Isn’t Handing Iran ‘Billions in Cash’ [WATCH]
News

JD Vance Details Trump’s Peace Deal with Iran: No, Trump Isn’t Handing Iran ‘Billions in Cash’ [WATCH]

/

Iran could gain access to as much as $300 billion in reconstruction-related investments from Gulf nations under a newly signed memorandum of understanding with the United States, according to comments made Monday by Vice President JD Vance, as reported by The New York Post.

The agreement, which was electronically signed on Sunday, has not yet been publicly released. Administration officials say any economic benefits for Tehran would be conditioned on significant changes in behavior, including ending its nuclear program and complying with international inspections.

Speaking with CBS News, Vance addressed reports that the agreement includes a reconstruction initiative worth up to $300 billion.

“That’s the sort of thing they could have access to, funded by the Gulf Coast Coalition, so long as they honor their end of the obligation,” Vance said.

Administration officials emphasized that the proposed investments would not involve American taxpayer funds. Vance reiterated that point during an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity.

“The Iranians don’t get a dime unless they behave and change their behavior” and will “never get a dime of American taxpayer money. Ever. Full stop. Not even close.”

According to Vance, Iran would only become eligible for investment if it permanently abandons its nuclear ambitions and complies with a strict monitoring system.

“We absolutely are open to the Gulf Coast countries investing in the reconstruction of Iran, but only if Iran ends their nuclear program, ends their enriched stockpile of material, and is really open to an inspections and enforcement regime that gives the American people confidence they’re never going to have a nuclear weapon,” Vance said.

The proposal has generated skepticism among some Republicans, largely because the text of the agreement remains unavailable to lawmakers and the public.

Lindsey Graham criticized reports of a reconstruction fund last week, writing on X that the “idea of a $300 billion reconstruction fund, given who is in charge of Iran, seems to be tone deaf.

It would be akin to a Marshall Plan for Germany with the Nazis still in charge.”

By Monday, Graham said he expected the Trump administration to release the agreement’s text and stated that if the memorandum contains the provisions described by administration officials, “the proposal as envisioned by the Vice President and the Trump Administration to end the Iranian conflict would be transformative for the region and a major achievement, leading to broader peace.”

The agreement follows more than three months of conflict that began when the United States and Israel launched attacks against Iran on Feb. 28.

During the conflict, Iran launched strikes against regional countries, including the UAE, Qatar, Jordan, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia, all of which host American military facilities.

Administration officials said the memorandum is designed to restore conditions that existed before the conflict, including reopening the Strait of Hormuz and ending the U.S. naval blockade.

More detailed negotiations regarding Iran’s nuclear activities would occur later.

Senior U.S. officials also outlined broader economic incentives available to Tehran if it complies with future requirements.

“The more they behave like a normal country, the more that they show they’re willing to be a good partner, then we’re going to be willing to be extraordinarily generous in opening up their economy and opening up the sanctions relief that the deal contemplates,” one official said.

Officials said Iran could receive phased sanctions relief, access to frozen assets, and eventual reintegration into the global economy.

In exchange, Tehran would be expected to meet denuclearization benchmarks and could potentially end support for proxy organizations, including Hamas and Hezbollah.

The administration also confirmed that the reconstruction initiative would consist of investment projects rather than direct cash transfers.

Gulf nations would provide capital through infrastructure and development investments if Iran becomes a viable destination for those projects.

“That only happens if they make themselves investable, when they make themselves a country where you can really see that there’s not going to be snapback [sanctions for] pursuing a nuclear weapon or playing these games in the shadows,” a senior official said.

Administration officials acknowledged that misinformation surrounding the still-unreleased agreement has fueled speculation about its contents.

“There is a lot of misinformation out there,” one official said.

The White House has indicated that the memorandum’s text is expected to be released by Friday. Officials also said technical discussions with Iranian representatives are scheduled to begin later this week.

The agreement also contemplates a gradual lifting of the U.S. blockade currently affecting Iranian trade. In exchange, Iran would reopen the Strait of Hormuz to international shipping without imposing transit tolls.

Officials cautioned that commercial traffic through the strait could take weeks to return to normal levels as shipping companies and crews evaluate regional stability following the conflict.

All Eight Crew Feared Dead After B52 Test Mission Crash in California Desert [WATCH]
News

All Eight Crew Feared Dead After B52 Test Mission Crash in California Desert [WATCH]

/

All eight crew members aboard a U.S. Air Force B-52 Stratofortress are believed to have died after the aircraft crashed Monday morning shortly after departing from Edwards Air Force Base in California, according to military officials, as reported by The Post Millennial.

The crash occurred shortly after takeoff during what officials described as a routine test mission. Emergency response teams were immediately dispatched to the scene as authorities began assessing the wreckage and gathering information about the incident.

In a statement released following the crash, officials said the aircraft was carrying eight people when it went down at approximately 11:20 a.m. local time.

“Initial indications are that the crash was not survivable.”

Military officials have not yet released the identities of the crew members, and no additional details regarding the cause of the crash were immediately available.

Investigators are expected to examine flight data, maintenance records, weather conditions, and other factors as part of the inquiry into what led to the loss of the aircraft.

The B-52 Stratofortress has served as a cornerstone of the U.S. Air Force’s long-range bomber fleet for decades. The aircraft remains in active service and continues to be used for a variety of missions, including testing, training, and strategic operations.

Monday’s crash occurred near Edwards Air Force Base, one of the nation’s most significant military aviation facilities.

Located in California’s Mojave Desert, approximately 100 miles north of Los Angeles, the installation has played a central role in American aerospace development and military flight testing.

Edwards Air Force Base has been the site of numerous aviation milestones over the years.

Among its most notable achievements was the historic 1947 flight by test pilot Chuck Yeager, who became the first person to break the sound barrier during a supersonic flight conducted in the area.

The base continues to serve as a major center for aircraft testing and evaluation, supporting both military and aerospace programs.

As emergency crews worked at the crash site, officials provided few additional details about the circumstances surrounding the incident.

The Air Force has not announced whether any distress calls were made before the aircraft went down or whether there were any indications of mechanical problems before takeoff.

The loss of a B-52 and its crew would mark a significant incident for the Air Force, and military investigators are expected to conduct a comprehensive review of the crash.

Authorities have indicated that additional information will be released as the investigation progresses and more facts become available.

For now, officials say all eight individuals aboard the aircraft are believed to have perished in the crash shortly after departure from Edwards Air Force Base.

The incident remains under investigation.

Minnesota Colleges Expose Massive Ghost Student Financial Aid Scam [WATCH]
News

Minnesota Colleges Expose Massive Ghost Student Financial Aid Scam [WATCH]

/

Minnesota colleges and universities are confronting a growing wave of financial aid fraud involving so-called “ghost students,” fraudulent applicants who use stolen or fabricated identities to enroll in classes, secure federal aid, and then disappear, as reported by Trending Politics News.

The problem has expanded to the point that state lawmakers and higher education officials are now pursuing additional safeguards aimed at protecting taxpayers and ensuring legitimate students are not displaced by fraudulent enrollments.

The issue gained widespread attention after Minnesota State, which oversees 33 public colleges and universities, reported a significant increase in suspicious applications during the past academic year.

According to state officials and reporting by KSTP, more than 7,700 applications were flagged as fraudulent or potentially fraudulent.

While many of those applications were identified before financial aid funds were distributed, some fraudulent applicants successfully obtained federal aid, resulting in schools being required to repay the federal government.

Ghost students typically take advantage of online enrollment systems and federal student aid programs.

Investigators say scammers use stolen Social Security numbers, synthetic identities, or other fraudulent information to gain admission to colleges and universities. Once enrolled, they register for courses and apply for Pell Grants and federal student loans.

After aid money is disbursed, the individuals often withdraw from classes or simply stop participating.

In some cases, investigators say fraudulent students submit coursework generated by artificial intelligence to maintain enrollment long enough for aid payments to be released.

Although colleges across the country have reported similar schemes, Minnesota has become one of the states taking a more aggressive approach to addressing the issue.

According to reports, at least three Minnesota institutions were required to repay between $9,500 and $63,457 to the federal government after ghost students successfully obtained financial aid funds.

State officials have not publicly identified the schools involved, citing concerns that disclosure could attract additional fraud attempts.

Beyond the financial impact, college administrators warn that fraudulent enrollments create obstacles for legitimate students seeking access to classes.

Ghost students can occupy limited classroom seats, particularly in courses that routinely reach enrollment capacity. As a result, legitimate students may face difficulties registering for required classes.

The issue is especially challenging for students who depend on financial aid and timely course registration to remain on track toward graduation.

In response, Minnesota lawmakers are considering legislation that would strengthen identity verification procedures for prospective students.

A proposal currently moving through the Minnesota Legislature would provide approximately $1.5 million each year for advanced identity verification technology.

The proposed system would employ tools such as biometric verification, document authentication, and behavioral analysis to confirm applicants’ identities before they are allowed to register for classes or receive financial aid.

Federal officials have also highlighted the broader national scope of the problem.

Education investigators have identified more than $350 million in student aid fraud nationwide since 2019, though authorities believe the true figure could be substantially higher.

The rapid expansion of online learning during and after the COVID-19 pandemic created additional opportunities for organized fraud operations to target college enrollment systems and federal aid programs.

Some observers believe Minnesota’s losses may exceed earlier estimates. Reports cited by higher education officials indicate that nearly 2,000 ghost students may have obtained approximately $12.5 million in federal financial aid from Minnesota colleges.

Those figures have intensified concerns among state officials, who argue that stronger identity verification measures are necessary to prevent additional taxpayer-funded losses and protect educational opportunities for legitimate students.

Tulsi Gabbard Says Declassified Biolab Records Prove Biden Team Misled the Public [WATCH]
News

Tulsi Gabbard Says Declassified Biolab Records Prove Biden Team Misled the Public [WATCH]

/

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has released a collection of declassified records detailing U.S. funding and involvement in more than 120 biological laboratories located in over 30 countries, including dozens of facilities in Ukraine, as reported by Fox News.

The release, announced June 14, has renewed attention on questions surrounding overseas biological research programs that became a major topic of debate following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

According to Gabbard, the newly released records provide additional information about laboratory networks that were previously the subject of public controversy.

She argued that the documents support concerns that had been dismissed by some critics as misinformation.

The records include Office of the Director of National Intelligence briefing materials outlining U.S. involvement with biological laboratories in Ukraine.

One document states that more than 40 laboratories in the country received U.S. funding and maintained collections of bacteria and viruses, including some dating back to the Soviet era.

The records also indicate that Ukrainian scientists participated in U.S.-funded training programs focused on working with hazardous pathogens and handling especially dangerous diseases.

Among the pathogens listed in the declassified materials are anthrax, tuberculosis, plague, Ebola virus, Marburg virus, MERS, and SARS.

Additional documents describe construction, modernization, and laboratory improvement projects conducted at facilities across Ukraine, including locations in Kherson, Odesa, and western regions of the country.

According to the records, engineering firm Black & Veatch served as a major contractor on several projects. Individual laboratory upgrades and construction efforts reportedly ranged from approximately $1.7 million to $3.5 million in taxpayer-funded expenditures.

One assessment included in the release focuses on a veterinary research facility in Kharkiv that received support through the Defense Department’s Biological Threat Reduction Program.

The assessment states that the laboratory housed hundreds of pathogen samples, including Brucella bacteria, which can cause brucellosis.

The document also warned that the facility could become vulnerable during the conflict with Russia and potentially be damaged, captured, or exploited for propaganda purposes.

Another ODNI briefing slide outlines what it describes as a “web of connections” involving Ukrainian laboratories, U.S. government agencies, universities, research organizations, and private-sector contractors.

According to the document, American funding supported research involving bird flu and other highly infectious viruses conducted within high-security laboratory environments.

The release comes amid broader scrutiny of biological research programs and government transparency efforts.

Debate over the laboratories intensified after Russia’s 2022 invasion, with differing interpretations emerging regarding the purpose and oversight of the facilities.

Supporters of Gabbard’s decision to release the records argue that the documents provide information that had not been fully available to the public and offer greater insight into the scope of U.S.-backed biological research overseas.

Critics, however, continue to maintain that the laboratories were part of long-standing public health and threat-reduction initiatives designed to secure dangerous pathogens, improve disease monitoring, and reduce biological risks rather than conduct biological weapons research.

The declassification is expected to generate renewed discussion in Washington regarding government transparency, gain-of-function research, international laboratory partnerships, and the extent of U.S. involvement in biological research programs around the world.

As lawmakers, researchers, and policy experts review the newly released materials, the records are likely to remain part of a broader debate over biological security, foreign aid, and federal oversight of overseas research initiatives.

Republican Leaders Celebrate Viral World Cup Fans Falling in Love With True American Spirit [WATCH]
News

Republican Leaders Celebrate Viral World Cup Fans Falling in Love With True American Spirit [WATCH]

/

As international soccer fans travel across the United States ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, a growing number of visitors are attracting attention online by documenting their experiences with American culture, food, travel destinations, and local traditions, as reported by Fox News.

Among the most widely followed visitors is German soccer fan FreddyLA7, whose social media posts have generated millions of views as he chronicles a cross-country journey through the United States while following the German national team.

Rather than focusing exclusively on soccer, Freddy’s videos have highlighted experiences that many Americans consider everyday parts of life.

His posts have featured visits to Waffle House, Taco Bell, Buc-ee’s, Bass Pro Shops, highways stretching across multiple states, and college football venues.

The videos have resonated with viewers across social media platforms, generating widespread engagement and drawing responses from elected officials and political leaders who view the posts as a positive showcase of American culture.

The viral attention comes as the United States prepares to host millions of visitors for the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

While political debates surrounding immigration and travel policies have continued in the lead-up to the tournament, many foreign visitors have instead focused on sharing favorable impressions of local communities, regional traditions, and American hospitality.

Among those taking notice was Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, who shared one of Freddy’s posts on X after the German visitor traveled through Georgia, Tennessee, and Alabama.

Duffy praised the road trip experience and encouraged Americans to appreciate the country’s diversity of destinations.

“There’s no better way to see our country than on a road trip,” Duffy wrote. “Because to LOVE AMERICA you have to SEE AMERICA.”

Duffy also invited followers to suggest additional destinations for Freddy to visit as he continues his travels around the country.

Freddy’s growing popularity has led to interactions with officials from several states. After visiting Alabama and posting about his experiences there, Sen. Katie Britt highlighted the state’s role in his journey.

One of the stops that generated significant attention was Auburn University’s Jordan-Hare Stadium. Freddy posted videos expressing amazement at the atmosphere surrounding college football in the South.

Following those posts, Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey publicly encouraged him to return during football season.

“Y’all ought to come back in the fall to see just how we do Saturdays in Alabama,” Ivey wrote.

Freddy’s travels also brought him to Florida’s Gulf Coast, where he shared footage of the beaches and coastline.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis responded after Freddy referred to the Gulf waters as “the sea,” playfully correcting the description while encouraging him to enjoy Florida’s coastline.

The German visitor’s road trip has become one of several viral examples of international fans discovering parts of the United States that often receive less global attention than major tourist destinations.

Videos featuring restaurants, roadside attractions, local traditions, and regional culture have attracted millions of viewers and generated discussion about how the World Cup could showcase more than just soccer.

With the tournament scheduled to bring visitors from around the globe next year, Freddy’s journey has offered an early glimpse of how international guests may experience the country beyond stadiums and host cities.

For many viewers, the popularity of these videos reflects growing interest in the local culture, hospitality, and traditions that visitors encounter while traveling through communities across the United States.

JD and Usha Vance Discuss Fourth Child After Charlie Kirk Tragedy
News

JD and Usha Vance Discuss Fourth Child After Charlie Kirk Tragedy

/

Vice President JD Vance and Second Lady Usha Vance are sharing new details about the personal conversations that influenced their decision to welcome a fourth child, including the impact of conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s death in September 2025, as reported by Fox News.

The couple discussed the subject during an appearance on CBS News Sunday Morning while promoting Vance’s upcoming book, “Communion: Finding My Way Back to Faith,” which is scheduled for release on June 16.

According to Vance’s book, one of the most memorable moments following Kirk’s death involved a conversation with Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk.

Vance wrote that he sat with Erika on the day of her husband’s assassination and recalled her telling Usha that she “regretted having only two kids with Charlie.”

The conversation became a significant moment for the Vance family as they continued discussing whether to have another child.

In the book, Vance wrote that while he and Usha had previously talked about expanding their family, “something changed” for both of them after Charlie Kirk’s death.

During the CBS interview, Usha Vance explained how the experience affected her husband’s thinking.

“I think it really heightened JD’s sense that he’d been talking about this for a while, this sense that there was this possibility of having another kid whom he could love as much as the three that we had,” Usha said.

She continued, “It really did crystallize for [him], that sense that if you could have that other child, then you would have nothing to regret. And if we couldn’t have that other child, then we were very happy with the children that we had. So it was very powerful what she said about her own family and certainly very moving to both of us.”

The Vances publicly announced in January that they were expecting their fourth child. The announcement was shared on social media, where the couple revealed they were expecting a son. The baby is due in July.

JD and Usha Vance are already parents to three children: Ewan, Vivek, and Mirabel.

While discussing the family’s decision, Usha emphasized that the conversation following Kirk’s death was not the sole reason they chose to have another child. She said the couple had already been considering the possibility before that moment.

“I think I had already started to open my mind to the possibility. I wouldn’t say this was for me in any way the decisive factor, but it came in the middle of a conversation that we were already having,” Usha said.

The interview also focused on Vance’s new book, which chronicles his return to religious faith and his conversion to Catholicism.

In a separate interview on “Jesse Watters Primetime,” Vance described the book as the story of his “long and winding road” toward faith after a period in his life when he felt he had “lost it” as a young man.

The memoir combines personal reflections on faith, family, and public life, while also recounting events that shaped some of the most important decisions facing the vice president and his family.

JD Vance Says Trump Would Be Supportive of Any 2028 Decision [WATCH]
News

JD Vance Says Trump Would Be Supportive of Any 2028 Decision [WATCH]

/

Vice President JD Vance says he has not yet determined whether he will pursue the Republican presidential nomination in 2028, but he believes President Donald Trump will support whatever path he ultimately chooses, as reported by the Gateway Pundit.

During an interview with CBS Sunday Morning, Vance discussed ongoing speculation about his political future and said he and Second Lady Usha Vance plan to evaluate their next steps after the 2026 midterm elections.

“I have no doubt that the president of the United States is going to be very supportive of anything that I ultimately decide to do,” Vance said.

“But we really just haven’t talked about what that thing will be.”

The vice president emphasized that his current attention remains focused on serving in the administration rather than preparing for another campaign.

“Usha and I will absolutely sit down and talk about what comes next for our family,” he said.

“The way I make decisions is, I try not to make them until I absolutely must.”

Vance’s comments come as political observers continue to speculate about potential Republican candidates for the 2028 presidential election.

While he remains one of the most prominent figures in the party, Vance indicated that any decision regarding a future campaign remains well down the road.

According to Vance, President Trump frequently raises the topic of future political developments, though those conversations are generally broad discussions rather than detailed planning sessions.

“I never bring it up. But sure, the president brings it up a lot, sometimes publicly, sometimes privately,” Vance said.

“You know, the president’s a political animal. He loves this stuff. He’s very fascinated by it.”

When asked whether Trump is actively encouraging him to seek the presidency, Vance described their discussions as informal conversations focused on the future of the Republican Party and the administration’s long-term success.

“It’s not positive or negative. It’s just … he kind of talks about it, like, ‘What’s gonna happen,’ you know?”

“How do we make sure that we’re successful? What does that mean for the future?’ It’s more of a conversation like that.”

Vance said those discussions occur periodically but do not involve specific campaign planning.

“So, we talk about it, but not in any great detail,” he added. “Because, again, I think both of us are focused on the here-and-now.”

The vice president also stressed that he does not want discussions about future political opportunities to distract from his current responsibilities in the White House.

Since taking office alongside President Trump, Vance has repeatedly stated that his priority is carrying out the duties of the vice presidency rather than focusing on future elections.

During the interview, he reiterated that approach and said keeping his attention on his present role is important to effectively serving the administration.

“I really don’t ever want my thought about a future job, whether it’s president or anything else, to make me a worse vice president,” he said.

“And the way to do that is to keep my attention on the job I have right now.”

For now, Vance said any decisions about a possible presidential run remain in the future, with discussions about his political plans expected to take place after the 2026 midterm elections and in consultation with his family.


Scroll to Top