Author name: Red Voice Media

Economics

Trump Smacks Down Bloomberg Reporter’s “Stupid” Anti-Tariff Question in Midflight

President Donald Trump responded forcefully to a question from a Bloomberg reporter on Sunday regarding the potential economic impact of his administration’s tariff policies.

The exchange occurred during a press availability aboard Air Force One, just days after the rollout of sweeping reciprocal tariffs referred to by the administration as “Liberation Day.”

Annmarie Hordern of Bloomberg asked President Trump whether there was a point at which he would reconsider his tariff strategy if it caused continued market declines.

“I think your question is so stupid,” Trump said.

“I mean it, I think it’s a— Uh, I don’t want anything to go down. But sometimes you have to take medicine to fix something.”

Trump went on to defend the tariffs as a necessary step to protect American workers and businesses, placing blame on prior administrations for trade policies that, in his view, contributed to the erosion of U.S. manufacturing and economic strength.

“We have been treated so badly by other countries because we had stupid leadership that allowed this to happen,” Trump said.

“They took our businesses, they took our money, they took our jobs. They moved it to Mexico. They moved it to Canada. They moved a lot of it to China and it’s not sustainable. We’re not gonna do it.”

Trump credited his tariff policies with generating new revenue for the United States and attracting global attention.

“Now we have hundreds of billions of dollars pouring into our country on a monthly basis. It’s pouring. It’s already started because I put tariffs on,” Trump said. “And eventually it’s gonna straighten out, and our country will be solid and strong again.”

The administration’s recent tariff actions have triggered a broad response worldwide.

More than 50 countries have signaled interest in negotiations to avoid new U.S. tariffs, according to Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins.

“We already have 50 — five-zero — countries that have come to the table over the last few days, over the last weeks, that are willing and desperate to talk to us,” Rollins told CNN’s Jake Tapper on Sunday morning.

“We are the economic engine of the world, and it’s finally time that someone, President Trump, stood up for America.”

Rollins addressed concerns raised by critics who argue that the tariffs could damage the stock market or increase prices for consumers.

She said such concerns are politically motivated and do not reflect the broader benefits of the policy shift.

“This is about putting America first,” Rollins said, pointing to trade imbalances and longstanding barriers faced by U.S. exporters.

She cited examples such as Mexico’s past refusal to buy American corn and Australia’s restrictions on U.S. beef imports.

Rollins also emphasized that the administration’s broader strategy includes not only tariffs but also deregulation, tax cuts, and policies aimed at achieving energy independence.

She described the approach as a comprehensive economic reset modeled on principles of national self-reliance and security.

When asked if the tariffs are intended to be permanent, Rollins said they are part of a longer-term national strategy to reshore jobs and restore industrial strength.

The administration’s tariff actions follow years of trade deficits and complaints from U.S. industries and labor groups about unfair practices by foreign competitors.

Trump’s latest round of tariffs applies reciprocal surcharges on a wide range of imports from countries that impose barriers on American goods.

Further negotiations are expected in the coming weeks as other nations seek exemptions or new trade agreements.

For now, the administration remains firm in its position, asserting that the measures are necessary to reestablish economic fairness and protect U.S. sovereignty in global trade.

Please visit RVM News for more stories like this.

crime

New Death Penalty Law in Idaho Sends Brutal Warning to Pedophiles

Image Credit: Everett Collection – Shutterstock.com

Convicted child rapists in Idaho can now face execution by firing squad, following the passage of a new law signed by Governor Brad Little on April 1, 2025, as reported by The Blaze.

The law, known as House Bill 380, makes child rape a capital offense in the state. The bill passed the Idaho House unanimously, though five senators—three Democrats and two Republicans — voted against it in the Senate. It comes just weeks after Idaho made the firing squad the state’s primary method of execution.

Robert Hoetink – Shutterstock.com

Gov. Little stated at the time of the bill’s ratification:

“Just like capital murder destroys lives, aggravated sexual abuse of a young child devastates victims and families for generations. The sexual abuse of children is sickening and evil, and perpetrators convicted of these crimes deserve the ultimate punishment.”

Sponsored by Republican state Reps. Bruce Skaug and Josh Tanner, the bill creates mandatory minimum sentences and increases penalties for sex crimes against children.

Under the new law, adults convicted of molesting a minor between ages 13 and 16 can face a minimum of 25 years in prison and up to life, provided at least two aggravating factors are present.

These aggravating factors include kidnapping the victim, inflicting great bodily harm, engaging in human trafficking, being a registered sex offender, being in a position of trust or custodial authority, use of coercion, or choking the victim during the offense.

In more severe cases, adults convicted of aggravated lewd conduct involving a child 12 or under may now be sentenced to either life in prison or death, again based on two or more aggravating factors.

In these cases, additional aggravating factors include any form of penile penetration or repeat offenses involving the same child. Rep. Skaug spoke to the House Judiciary, Rules and Administration Committee stating:

“Idaho currently has some of the most lenient statutes for child molestation and child rape in the nation. This legislation establishes a strong deterrent, making it clear Idaho will not tolerate these offenses.”

Idaho previously limited the death penalty to first-degree murder cases involving aggravating factors. With this expansion, Idaho joins Florida and Tennessee in allowing the death penalty for child rape.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis implemented a similar law in 2023 saying:

“We really believe that part of a just society is to have appropriate punishment. And so, if you commit a crime that is really, really heinous, you should have the ultimate punishment.”

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis , joined by Brevard Sheriff Wayne Ivey and Polk Sheriff Grady Judd , speaks on his plan to stop illegal immigration during a press conference at the Sheriff’s Operation Center Wednesday January 15, 2025 in Winter Haven Fl. Ernst Peters/The Ledger

Tennessee passed its version in 2024. Gov. Bill Lee signed legislation that permits capital punishment or life without parole for those convicted of raping children under age 13. For victims aged 8 or younger, the law requires either the death penalty or life imprisonment without parole.

Alabama may soon follow. In February 2025, the Alabama House voted 86-5 in favor of legislation that would make the rape of a child under 12 a capital crime.

Some Democrats have opposed such measures. In Idaho, Sens. Alison Rabe, Ron Taylor, and Melissa Wintrow voted against HB 380, along with Republican Sens. Phil Hart and Daniel Foreman.

The Idaho Capital Sun noted that lawmakers expect legal challenges ahead, citing a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision where the majority ruled the death penalty unconstitutional for child rape when the victim was not killed.

Despite that, Gov. Little said Idaho will continue pushing for strict enforcement.

“I commend my partners in the Legislature for strengthening Idaho’s already powerful ‘tough on crime’ reputation among the state.”

Visit RVM News for more stories like this.

Democrats

Anti-Trump-Musk Protesters Hit the Streets, Make a Little Noise, Even Less Sense

Protests targeting President Donald Trump and entrepreneur Elon Musk were held Saturday in several liberal-leaning cities across the United States.

Demonstrations occurred in urban areas such as New York City, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C., but turnout remained modest, and messaging remained largely consistent with slogans seen in past election cycles.

Organized primarily through social media platforms and progressive networks, the protests were billed as expressions of opposition to what organizers referred to as the “authoritarian agenda” of President Trump’s second term and what they labeled as “corporate overreach” by Musk, CEO of X and SpaceX.

The events marked some of the first nationally coordinated anti-Trump protests since the president’s re-election in 2024, but initial reporting and eyewitness accounts suggest the events were smaller and less energized compared to earlier protest movements such as the Women’s March in 2017 or Black Lives Matter demonstrations in 2020.

In New York City, approximately a few hundred people gathered in Union Square, holding signs and chanting slogans opposing Trump’s economic policies and Musk’s business dealings.

Several protestors expressed concern about Trump’s renewed use of tariffs and what they described as attacks on academic freedom and immigration enforcement actions targeting student visa holders involved in campus unrest.

“We’re here to show that not everyone supports what’s happening in Washington,” one protestor told a local outlet.

“We reject the hate and the corporate collusion.”

In San Francisco, demonstrators focused more heavily on Musk, with signs criticizing his ownership of X, as well as his influence in technology and political conversations.

Some attendees cited concerns over content moderation and alleged disinformation, though they did not provide specific examples when asked by reporters.

Despite the online promotion of the events, many of the protests saw lower-than-expected participation.

In several cases, protestors were outnumbered by journalists, police, and counter-protestors.

Footage circulating online showed sparse gatherings and signs featuring recycled slogans, with little clarity on specific policy goals.

The protests were covered by several national media outlets, with some commentators noting that the demonstrations were largely confined to urban centers where Democratic voter majorities are firmly established.

There were no reports of large-scale disruptions or arrests as of Saturday evening.

President Trump, who has not directly addressed the protests, has continued to focus on economic and immigration policy in recent weeks.

His administration’s enforcement actions on college campuses and new tariff plans have drawn international attention, particularly following responses from the United Kingdom and other trade partners.

Elon Musk has also not commented publicly on the demonstrations.

In recent months, Musk has remained active on X, where he frequently engages with political and cultural issues and has defended his platform’s approach to free speech.

While some activists described Saturday’s events as the beginning of a new wave of progressive mobilization, critics noted the lack of new messaging or clear direction.

The protests appeared to largely reflect opposition to Trump’s return to office rather than any coordinated legislative or electoral strategy.

Officials in cities where demonstrations took place confirmed that police maintained a presence at protest sites to ensure safety, but no major incidents were reported.

As the Trump administration continues to roll out policy changes in its second term, political observers expect further demonstrations and organizing efforts.

However, the scope and influence of those efforts remain uncertain as Democratic leaders regroup following the 2024 election loss.

Please visit Drew Berquist.com for more stories like this.

Democrats

Kamala Harris Crawls Back Into Spotlight to Trash Trump Again

Former Vice President Kamala Harris resurfaced Thursday to speak at the Leading Women Defined Summit in Dana Point, California, where she sharply criticized President Donald Trump’s second term and warned against what she described as a growing silence in the face of “unconstitutional threats.”

“We’re seeing people stay quiet. We are seeing organizations stay quiet. We are seeing those who are capitulating to clearly unconstitutional threats. And these are the things we are witnessing. Each day in the last few months in our country. And it understandably creates a great sense of fear. Because you know there were many things we knew would happen.”

As Fox News reported, the speech marked one of Harris’ most public appearances since her loss to President Trump in the 2024 presidential election. Though she lost the race in November, Harris took the stage with renewed energy and referenced her earlier warnings about Trump’s return to office.

Vice President Kamala Harris greets the crowd in Jenison Field House on the Michigan State campus Sunday, Nov. 3, 2024.

“I’m not here to say I told you so,” she said, pausing before adding with a laugh, “I swear, I wasn’t going to say that,” drawing laughter from the audience.

The appearance also came as reports surfaced detailing how Harris and her 2024 running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, were reportedly stunned by the outcome of the election. According to journalist Amie Parnes, Harris “was completely shocked,” by the defeat.

Parnes, co-author of the new book Fight: Inside the Wildest Battle for the White House, spoke on the podcast “Somebody’s Gotta Win with Tara Palmeri,” which aired Thursday.

The book, co-written with NBC reporter Jonathan Allen, details the 2024 campaign and the political fallout following President Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the race, which placed Harris at the top of the Democratic ticket.

Harris’ criticism of Trump on Thursday comes amid ongoing legal and market challenges tied to several of the president’s initiatives. A number of Trump’s executive actions remain tied up in court proceedings, and markets reacted sharply this week to his new tariffs, which have disrupted global trade activity and caused significant stock market volatility.

Thursday’s address was not Harris’ first public appearance since the election. In February, she gave a speech while accepting an award during the NAACP Image Awards. During that appearance, she also took indirect swipes at Trump and Department of Government Efficiency chief Elon Musk.

While Harris has remained mostly out of the spotlight since the 2024 election, her remarks at Dana Point suggest she plans to re-engage publicly as Trump’s administration continues to roll out new policy directives.

Visit Drew Berquist.com for more stories like this.

News

Trump Admin Reshapes Health Policy—FDA Leadership Faces Reckoning

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other key public health agencies are undergoing major leadership and structural changes following recent moves by the Trump administration and Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

The shake-up includes mass layoffs, agency leadership resignations, and public disputes over federal drug approval policies and vaccine regulation.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. testifies on Jan. 29, 2025, at his Senate hearing on his nomination to be the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.

Earlier this week, HHS confirmed a reduction of 20,000 positions, accounting for approximately 24% of its workforce. As part of the restructuring, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) reportedly placed five agency chiefs on administrative leave Monday.

Among those affected are leaders from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

These divisions have come under scrutiny for past research funding decisions, including grants related to Chinese labs and controversial gender research.

New NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, who was sworn in on Tuesday, informed staff in an internal email that the reorganization would require changes to the agency’s approach in areas such as communications, legislative affairs, procurement, and human resources.

He emphasized priorities like scientific transparency and academic freedom. NIH’s Deputy Director of Public Affairs, Amanda Fine, directed media outlets to file Freedom of Information Act requests to access the email, calling it an “official record.”

Nature reported that some of the NIH and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) staff were offered reassignment to the Indian Health Service.

NOTUS also confirmed that CDC officials had received similar transfer offers, particularly relocating away from the agency’s main office in Atlanta.

At the FDA, significant changes have drawn attention from the pharmaceutical industry.

Former FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, who served in the Obama and Biden administrations and later worked in a strategic role for Google’s parent company Alphabet, wrote on LinkedIn that the agency “as we’ve known it is finished.”

He warned that a loss of experienced leadership could affect drug development and public safety.

Califf’s departure follows that of other top officials. Peter Marks, Director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), resigned last week.

Politico and the Associated Press reported that Marks was given the option to resign or be dismissed by Secretary Kennedy, with the approval of newly installed FDA Commissioner Marty Makary.

Marks’ March 28 resignation letter, addressed to acting Commissioner Sara Brenner, cited concerns about misinformation but did not mention the ultimatum.

Makary, whose swearing-in date was not specified in the FDA’s April 1 press release, has already made staffing changes.

On Wednesday, Danish-American vaccine safety researcher Tracy Beth Hoeg confirmed she was hired as a special assistant to Makary. Hoeg has publicly criticized federal COVID-19 research and vaccine policies, including the U.S. childhood immunization schedule.

Marks’ departure coincided with a sharp decline in the stock prices of several biotech firms. Companies like Moderna, Beam Therapeutics, and Sarepta Therapeutics saw significant single-day losses, according to the Wall Street Journal.

These companies are heavily invested in mRNA and gene therapy technologies, areas that Marks previously supported.

University of California San Francisco epidemiologist Vinay Prasad criticized Marks’ leadership, citing repeated approval of COVID-19 boosters for infants without randomized clinical trial data.

Registered Nurse Jaya Rawla prepares a Moderna COVID-19 vaccines at the Fuller Middle School vaccination clinic for Framingham school staff and teachers, March 18, 2021.

Stanford professor George Tidmarsh echoed those concerns, accusing Marks of prioritizing pharmaceutical industry interests over patient safety.

Both cited controversial FDA decisions, including the approval of aducanumab, an Alzheimer’s drug that has since been withdrawn. Critics argue it was authorized without adequate evidence and based on disputed scientific theories.

Bhattacharya raised similar concerns about NIH’s approach to Alzheimer’s research during his Senate confirmation hearing.

The broader restructuring of public health agencies comes amid increased scrutiny of federal science policy, pharmaceutical regulation, and administrative spending.

The administration has also moved to reduce indirect-cost payments on federal research grants, a policy that critics say disproportionately benefits institutional administrators over researchers.

The White House has not yet provided an official timeline for the full implementation of the staffing changes. Additional reassignments, restructuring, and appointments are expected in the coming weeks.

Visit RVM News for more articles like this.

News

Elon Musk to Wrap Up DOGE Role on Schedule, Leavitt Fires Back at Media Spin

Elon Musk isn’t going rogue, and he’s certainly not being pushed out. Despite desperate attempts by left-leaning outlets like Politico to stir up drama, Musk’s tenure with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is unfolding exactly as planned, as reported by Fox News.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt shut down the latest media rumor mill on Wednesday after Politico claimed President Trump had supposedly told confidants that Musk would be “stepping back” in the coming weeks.

Image Credit:https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/washington-february-22-2025-white-house-2589320081

According to Leavitt, there’s no scoop here—just spin.

“This ‘scoop’ is garbage. Elon Musk and President Trump have both publicly stated that Elon will depart from public service as a special government employee when his incredible work at DOGE is complete.”

This is not breaking news. Musk’s appointment was always temporary.

President Trump brought Musk aboard as a “special government employee” under a federal provision that permits temporary assignments lasting no more than 130 days within a 365-day period. Musk’s clock started ticking on Inauguration Day—January 20—and it runs out May 30.

Since taking on the role, Musk has led DOGE with the kind of innovation and urgency that the D.C. swamp has sorely lacked. With a goal to slash a trillion dollars in government waste, the initiative has already delivered tangible results.

Elon Musk waving a chainsaw presented to him by Argentine President Javier Milei, right, at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center in National Harbor, Md. at the 2025 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) event on Feb. 20, 2025 at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center.

President Trump signed the executive order forming DOGE to streamline bloated bureaucracies, and Musk jumped in with characteristic boldness.

During a Thursday interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier, Musk stayed on message. Asked whether he’d stick around past the 130-day limit, Musk replied, “I think we will have accomplished most of the work required to reduce the deficit by a trillion dollars within that time frame.”

Watch the full interview here:

President Trump also weighed in on Musk’s future, hinting that while he’d love to keep the Tesla and SpaceX chief around, he understands the limits.

“I think he’s amazing. But I also think he’s got a big company to run. I’d keep him as long as I can keep him. He’s a very talented guy. You know, I love very smart people. He’s very smart. And he’s done a good job.”

As usual, legacy media outlets are less interested in facts and more focused on misleading narratives. White House spokesman Harrison Fields didn’t hold back:

“Politico has become a tabloid paper that would rather run fake news for clicks than real reporting. This is exactly why President Trump and DOGE have terminated millions of dollars in wasteful, government contracts to so-called news organizations that have diminished their credibility with the American people.”

Musk’s departure isn’t scandalous. It’s the conclusion of a mission that was designed to be short-term, effective, and impactful. Washington isn’t used to efficiency—but DOGE, under Musk’s leadership, is delivering just that.

Visit Drew Berquist.com for more stories like this.

News

Musk: Arrest Coming in Massive Social Security Fraud Tied to Illegal Aliens

Image Credit: © Jack Gruber, Jack Gruber / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

During a tele-town hall with Wisconsin voters Monday night, Elon Musk revealed that an arrest is expected in connection to a major Social Security fraud operation involving the stolen identities of over 400,000 Americans.

The fraud, Musk alleged, is part of a broader effort that includes the exploitation of U.S. welfare systems and voter rolls by illegal immigrants.

Musk made the remarks while addressing voters in Wisconsin, responding to a question from a caller in Pulaski who asked whether the fraud uncovered in the Social Security system would be prosecuted.

“Yes. In fact, I believe someone is going to be arrested tomorrow,” Musk said.

“This is someone who actually stole 400,000 Social Security numbers and personal information from the Social Security database, and was selling Social Security numbers and all the identification information in order for people to basically steal money from Social Security.”

Musk said the method of fraud has far-reaching implications, including misuse of government benefits and unauthorized participation in the U.S. election system.

“This is a particular avenue of fraud for illegal immigrants and for voter fraud, because the main way that identification is established in the United States is via Social Security,” Musk explained.

He criticized what he described as a deliberate effort to reshape the federal government’s infrastructure to support illegal immigration.

“The Democrats have basically taken every part of the government that could possibly be bent toward providing financial incentives for illegal immigrants to come to and remain in the United States—whether it’s Social Security, disability, Medicare, unemployment, even IRS refunds without any income,” Musk said.

“It’s wild.”

Musk also pointed to the misuse of emergency relief funds. “They diverted FEMA funds—which are supposed to be for helping Americans in distress from natural disasters—to pay for luxury hotels in New York for illegals to stay in. In fact, they’re still there.”

Antonio Gracias, a senior figure within the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), also presented data during a previous town hall Sunday in Wisconsin that Musk referenced Monday night.

According to Gracias, the number of Social Security numbers issued to non-citizens surged from 270,000 in 2021 to over 2.1 million in 2024.

“We found 1.3 million of them already on Medicaid as an example,” Gracias said.

“On every benefit program we went through, we found groups from this particular group of people, 5.5 million people in those benefit programs. And then what was really, really disturbing us was why. We’re asking ourselves why. And so we actually just took a sample and looked at voter registration records, and we found people here registered to vote in this population.”

Gracias confirmed that the findings have been referred to federal investigators.

“We’ve referred them to prosecution at Homeland Security Investigations,” he said.

“That’s happening right now.”

Musk also addressed the larger issue of outdated federal infrastructure, calling it the “thorniest computer problem I’ve ever seen.”

He noted that many of the government’s systems are still running decades-old software, including long-delayed projects like the IRS modernization effort launched in 1995, which Musk criticized as being perpetually “five years away” from completion.

Officials have not publicly named the suspect allegedly behind the theft of 400,000 Social Security numbers.

Please visit RVM News for more stories like this.

News

EXPOSED: Historic Biden Cognitive Decline Cover-Up Scandal Details Surface

A new tell-all book, Fight: Inside the Wildest Battle for the White House, continues to expose shocking details about Joe Biden’s declining health during his re-election campaign.

The book sheds light on several troubling incidents, including one where Biden’s handlers had to use fluorescent tape on the floor to prevent him from wandering off during a speaking engagement, just days before the 2024 election.

In one particularly concerning moment, Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) encountered Biden, only for the former president to seemingly fail to recognize the congressman.

U.S. Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., talks with community members after a Working Hero Iowa event on Monday, Feb. 18, 2019 at the Public Library in Iowa City, Iowa. 190218 Swalwell 012 Jpg

According to the book, Swalwell had to remind Biden of who he was, even providing personal details to jog his memory.

While Swalwell may not be the most high-profile politician, he had been a visible figure within the Democratic Party for over a decade, having met Biden several times.

The incident, however, was not reported at the time, as the priority for Biden’s inner circle was to maintain the cover-up.

As the book continues to reveal, Biden’s physical decline was also masked in public appearances.

One of Biden’s former aides disclosed that a makeup artist was used to hide the toll his deteriorating health had taken on his appearance.

These efforts, including using makeup for Zoom calls, became necessary as Biden’s condition worsened.

This effort to cover up his physical decline gained more attention after an incident at the G7 Summit, when Biden wandered off during a photo-op.

Conservative outlets like RedState were quick to report the incident, only for the White House and mainstream press to accuse them of spreading “cheap fakes.” Despite the cover-up, these troubling details are now coming to light.

Jill Biden, however, remained fully supportive of her husband’s re-election bid.

Aug 19, 2024; Chicago, IL, USA; First Lady Jill Biden speaks during the first day of the Democratic National Convention at the United Center. The DNC program will feature President Joe Biden and Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during Monday’s ceremonies. Mandatory Credit: Jasper Colt-USA TODAY

According to the book, she was “a thousand percent” behind his campaign, regardless of the mounting concerns about his physical and cognitive state.

“At the end of the day, I don’t think anyone in that inner circle was presenting the president any contrary advice that this thing is not going to be easy or maybe this is not the best thing for the Democratic Party,” a source close to Biden’s campaign said.

Jill Biden’s unflinching support comes as little surprise to those familiar with her time as First Lady.

Her tenure has been marked by ambitious moves and a lifestyle seemingly centered around enjoying the high life funded by taxpayers.

However, she was not the only one driving the push for re-election. Many of Biden’s top advisors were equally invested in maintaining their positions of power.

The book describes the scene in the White House as a kind of “Weekend at Bernie’s” situation, with Biden’s inner circle reportedly deceiving the American people to protect their own interests.

It wasn’t until Biden’s disastrous debate performance that the public began to question the viability of his re-election campaign.

Despite the growing body of evidence concerning Biden’s decline, the media and political insiders continued to downplay the situation.

Administration officials frequently assured the public that Biden remained mentally sharp and fully capable of serving another term.

They brushed off his occasional stumbles as simple mistakes, even though his public gaffes were frequent and alarming.

The reality, however, is that Biden’s cognitive decline was far more severe than they were willing to admit, and by 2024, many wondered why he was still being allowed to attend public events at all.

While the release of tell-all books like Fight provide insight into the behind-the-scenes cover-ups, there is frustration that no one involved will face any consequences.

Questions linger about why figures like Rep. Swalwell didn’t speak out at the time, or why Biden’s staffers weren’t held accountable for their role in perpetuating the deception.

Many of these staffers have already moved on to new positions, despite their involvement in what could be the biggest presidential scandal of modern history.

As these revelations continue to unfold, one can’t help but wonder what else has been concealed—and what will be allowed to slide under the radar in the future.

Visit Drew Berquist.com for more articles like this.

Illegal Immigration

Trump’s Mass Deportation Plan on Record Pace Despite District Judge Interference

Image Credit: noamgalai – Shutterstock.com

Since President Donald Trump returned to the White House in January, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has deported over 100,000 individuals and made more than 113,000 arrests, according to a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) source who spoke to The Post on Monday.

The surge in removals comes as part of President Trump’s renewed immigration enforcement strategy, which began immediately after his Jan. 20 inauguration.

On his first day in office, he declared a national emergency at the southern border, deployed thousands of troops, suspended the asylum system for those entering the country illegally, and launched a nationwide deportation effort.

“He’s doing what he was voted in to do. Point blank!” an ICE source told The Post.

ICE has reportedly reached full capacity in its detention facilities and is now asking Congress to approve funding for additional beds.

The request comes after ICE arrested 32,000 individuals in the first 50 days of the Trump administration’s mass deportation initiative.

Although officials have not released detailed information on how many of the detainees are convicted criminals or what their national origins are, sources believe that the majority of deportees are being sent to Mexico.

In addition to ramping up arrests and removals, President Trump has implemented measures targeting transnational criminal organizations.

One such move involved invoking the Alien Enemies Act, a rarely used statute dating back to the 18th century, to deport members of Venezuelan gangs without trial.

On Sunday night, 17 alleged gang members from Tren de Aragua and MS-13 were transferred in shackles to a high-security prison in El Salvador, despite a federal judge having blocked the use of the Alien Enemies Act earlier in the month.

Illegal crossings at the U.S.-Mexico border have also dropped significantly.

DHS sources described the decline as “the Trump effect,” attributing the drop to the administration’s strict enforcement policies and emphasis on consequences for those entering the country illegally.

“Illegal entries into the United States are no longer a backdoor way to getting status,” a DHS source said.

In March, just under 7,000 illegal migrants crossed into the U.S., marking a 94% drop compared to the 137,000 who entered during the same month in 2024 under Joe Biden.

February also saw a sharp decline, with approximately 8,300 crossings—reportedly the lowest monthly total in at least 25 years.

“Everyone who is caught is charged and does time,” a DHS source stated.

“Migrants are scared there are consequences now.”

Most of the illegal crossings in recent weeks have occurred in the San Diego and El Paso border sectors, according to sources familiar with the data.

If the current pace continues, 2025 could see the lowest number of illegal border crossings since 1968.

President Trump’s immigration enforcement policies remain one of the defining issues of his administration, with ICE and DHS agencies moving swiftly to implement the directives.

As deportations continue to rise and border crossings decline, the administration has signaled it will continue pushing for greater resources to maintain and expand the current crackdown.

Please visit RVM News for more articles like this.

National Affairs

WHO Faces Major Financial Crisis After Trump Pulls U.S. Funding

The World Health Organization (WHO) has begun significant staffing cuts and financial restructuring after the United States’ withdrawal from the U.N. subsidiary earlier this year, a move initiated by President Donald Trump.

The Trump administration had criticized the WHO for mishandling the COVID-19 pandemic and other international health crises, which led to Trump signing an executive order to end U.S. funding to the organization.

President Trump had pointed out that the United States was paying $500 million to the WHO, while China, with a population of 1.4 billion people, was contributing significantly less.

He argued that this discrepancy was unfair. “That’s a big one,” Trump said during his comments.

He continued, “So, we paid $500 million to [the] World Health Organization when I was here, and I terminated it. China, with 1.4 billion people, we have 350 … nobody knows what we have because so many people came in illegally. But, let’s say we have 325, they have 1.4 billion, they were paying $39 million, we were paying $500 million. Seemed a little unfair to me, so that wasn’t the reason, but I dropped out.”

The United States has traditionally been the WHO’s largest financial contributor, providing about 18 percent of its overall funding.

In the wake of the U.S. withdrawal, the WHO has faced significant financial strain.

A memo from WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus acknowledged that the loss of U.S. funding, combined with reductions in official development assistance from other countries, has worsened the organization’s financial situation.

According to a report from Reuters, the WHO memo stated, “The United States’ announcement, combined with recent reductions in official development assistance by some countries to fund increased defense spending, has made our situation much more acute.”

The memo also pointed to the loss of U.S. contributions as a key factor in creating a funding gap of nearly $600 million this year.

To address this shortfall, the WHO proposed slashing its budget for the 2026-2027 period by 21%, reducing it from $5.3 billion to $4.2 billion.

In light of these financial challenges, the WHO has also been forced to reduce its workforce, with job cuts being implemented at the senior leadership level at its headquarters in Switzerland.

The restructuring will affect all levels and regions within the organization, according to the memo.

“Despite our best efforts, we are now at the point where we have no choice but to reduce the scale of our work and workforce,” the WHO memo said.

Following Trump’s executive order, the WHO expressed regret over the U.S. withdrawal but defended its work.

“WHO plays a crucial role in protecting the health and security of the world’s people, including Americans, by addressing the root causes of disease, building stronger health systems, and detecting, preventing and responding to health emergencies, including disease outbreaks, often in dangerous places where others cannot go,” the organization stated at the time.

The ongoing financial and staffing cuts at the WHO highlight the far-reaching effects of the U.S. decision to withdraw its support.

The global health agency now faces an uncertain future, as it grapples with its diminished resources and the loss of one of its most significant financial backers.

Please visit Drew Berquist for more articles like this.


Scroll to Top