Author name: Red Voice Media

Big Government

Biden’s FEMA Fails Again: 26 Families Promised Homes, Only 3 Get Them, It Gets Even Worse

Hurricane Helene made landfall in September, leaving widespread damage across the southern United States, particularly in North Carolina.

In the aftermath of the storm, residents in the state were left to pick up the pieces, only to find themselves grappling with delays in receiving much-needed federal aid.

This failure by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) marked one of the lowest points for Joe Biden’s administration, as the agency’s inability to effectively respond to the crisis in the Tar Heel State became a glaring example of government incompetence.

According to a report from WLOS ABC News, a top FEMA official had promised to help 26 families in Black Mountain, North Carolina, secure mobile homes by Christmas.

However, by the time of the update, only three families had been successfully placed in trailers.

The slow pace of progress raised concerns among local residents and officials, who criticized FEMA’s sluggish response to an urgent situation.

FEMA’s performance in North Carolina, particularly in regard to placing families in mobile homes, exemplifies the agency’s ongoing struggles.

The delay in providing timely and adequate assistance to families affected by the storm has led to frustration and disappointment.

For many, the promise of mobile home placements by Christmas now seems like an unattainable goal, with limited progress to show for the months that have passed since the storm.

In addition to the hardships faced by families, farmers in the region are still dealing with the aftermath of the storm’s destruction.

The damage to crops and infrastructure has made it difficult for many to recover, and the long-term impact on the agricultural community continues to be felt across the state.

The failure of FEMA to effectively assist those impacted by Hurricane Helene has become a symbol of broader challenges within the Biden-Harris administration.

Critics point to the agency’s inability to deliver prompt and sufficient aid as indicative of larger systemic issues, particularly in terms of disaster response and recovery efforts.

As residents and officials continue to await the aid they were promised, the situation in North Carolina remains dire.

With only three families placed in trailers out of the 26 promised, the recovery process seems to be moving at a glacial pace.

Read More at RVM News

crime

Food Fight: Chipotle Employee Attacked in Viral Incident

A violent altercation unfolded at a Chipotle restaurant in Brentwood, Washington, DC, on Saturday when a customer allegedly assaulted an employee over a dispute involving her Uber Eats order.

The incident, partially captured on video and widely shared on social media, has left the employee shaken and raised concerns about workplace safety.

The video, initially posted to X (formerly Twitter), shows the customer, carrying an empty bowl, pushing her way behind the counter.

She proceeds to scoop food into her bowl while employees attempt to stop her.

Roberto Hernandez, a Chipotle worker involved in the altercation, tried to retrieve the bowl, but the situation escalated.

As Hernandez reached for the bowl, the customer pulled it away and slapped him in the face, causing food to scatter across the workstation. “I was mad, upset. But I’m a man, you know I can’t hit a female,” Hernandez told WUSA9, explaining why he walked away from the confrontation.

Hernandez said the conflict began when the customer claimed her Uber Eats order was incorrect.

According to her, the burrito bowl she received did not include the double meat she had requested.

She demanded a refund, but Hernandez and his manager explained that refunds for third-party delivery orders must be handled through Uber Eats.

“I checked the receipt, and it showed she didn’t order double meat,” Hernandez stated.

However, the customer, dissatisfied with their response, took matters into her own hands by going behind the counter to assemble a new order.

The situation became more alarming when Hernandez revealed that the customer allegedly threatened staff after the incident. “Yesterday, she was saying, ‘I’m going to come back and stab them and take their life,’” Hernandez told the outlet, adding that the threats left him and his coworkers fearful.

The unidentified customer, however, disputed the claims, alleging that employees had put their hands on her first.

She told WUSA9, “I wasn’t aggressive toward them until I got assaulted. The video was cut short.” She also claimed that she only “threw” the bowl at the worker and not more.

In response, Chipotle filed a police report, and the customer has stated her intent to sue the restaurant chain.

Read More at Red Voice Media

Congress

Focus Groups Slam Democrats: “Complacent, Elitist, And Out of Touch”

In the wake of their 2024 election loss, Democrats are grappling with sharp criticism from focus groups that highlight voter discontent with the party’s perceived detachment, ineffectiveness, and focus on issues deemed irrelevant to their everyday lives.

The findings, gathered by progressive organization Navigator Research and shared with POLITICO, shed light on the growing divide between Democratic leadership and the electorate.

Navigator Research conducted focus groups with swing voters and former Democrats who supported Donald Trump in 2024 after backing Joe Biden in 2020.

The results painted a picture of a party viewed as complacent, elitist, and disconnected from working-class concerns.

When asked to associate the Democratic Party with an animal, one participant compared it to an ostrich, saying, “They’ve got their heads in the sand and are absolutely committed to their own ideas, even when they’re failing.”

Another likened the party to a koala, critiquing Democrats as “complacent and lazy about getting policy wins that we really need.”

Another participant was more direct, stating, “Democrats are not a friend of the working class anymore.”

A Georgia man who switched his vote to Trump in 2024 noted the party’s focus on social progressivism.

“I think what the Democratic elites and their politicians believe is often very different from what the average Democratic voter is. The elites that run the Democratic Party — I think they’re way too obsessed with appealing to this very far-left social progressivism that’s very popular on college campuses.”

Economic issues like inflation and tariffs revealed additional voter frustration.

Some participants admitted limited understanding of policy implications, while others expressed mixed feelings.

A Wisconsin man stated, “Obviously, I wouldn’t want stuff to go up, but at the same time, in the long run, would it be better off for America and maybe having more stuff made here?”

Rachael Russell, director of polling and analytics at Navigator Research, described the feedback as “a pretty scathing rebuke” of the Democratic Party’s image.

“This weakness they see — [Democrats] not getting things done, not being able to actually fight for people — is something that needs to be figured out. It might not be the message, it might be the policy. It might be something a little bit deeper that has to be addressed by the party.”

Russell suggested Trump’s current popularity reflects a “honeymoon” period, but she predicted a potential shift once he assumes office.

“Once things start happening, it’s going to take a turn, and so it’s going to rely really heavily on the actions in the first 100 days to see how we go from here,” she said.

Focus group participants also expressed doubts about Kamala Harris, the 2024 Democratic presidential nominee.

Descriptions of Harris included terms such as “inauthentic,” “very dishonest,” and “did not seem competent.”

An Arizona man criticized a comment she made during a Detroit speech, “You better thank a union member,” calling it “very disingenuous to me because I didn’t see an honest person that could be president.”

Another former Biden voter who backed Trump in 2024 explained, “It seemed like a lot of what [Harris] came out and said wasn’t really off-the-cuff, wasn’t coming from her. It was planned out and never genuine to her thoughts, whereas Trump, even though you never really knew what he was going to say, it was always him and genuine to what he thought.”

The Trump campaign’s controversial use of a 2019 clip of Harris supporting gender-affirming surgery for prison inmates was also discussed.

The ad’s tagline, “Kamala is for they/them. President Trump is for you,” resonated with some voters.

A Wisconsin woman noted her concerns with the party’s approach to societal norms, including transgender issues. “I think there needs to be some parameters on what’s accepted in society and what isn’t. Some of the societal norms, and I think that the Democrats have tried to open that up a little too much,” she said.

The focus group findings underscore the challenges Democrats face in reconnecting with a broad base of voters, many of whom feel alienated by the party’s current direction.

Read More at Red Voice Media

Big Government, Uncategorized

Georgia Homeowner Jailed for Trying To Evict Squatters From Her Property

A homeowner in Clayton County, Georgia, found herself in a shocking legal predicament after attempting to reclaim her property from an alleged squatter.

Loletha Hale, the rightful owner of the home, was arrested on charges of criminal trespass and making terroristic threats during a confrontation with Sakemeyia Johnson, the woman occupying her property, and her associates.

Hale’s ordeal began in August when she discovered Johnson living in her home.

Johnson claimed her presence was lawful, citing a controversial ruling by Clayton County Magistrate Judge Latrevia Lates-Johnson, who determined that Johnson was not a squatter due to her association with a partner of a previously evicted tenant.

After months of legal disputes, including Johnson filing for bankruptcy to delay eviction proceedings, Hale eventually secured a court judgment affirming her ownership of the property.

However, she had not yet obtained a signed writ of possession, a legal requirement to enforce eviction in Georgia. Believing the property to be vacated, Hale returned to clean and prepare it for her own use. Johnson, however, allegedly broke back into the home, escalating tensions.

When a confrontation ensued, Clayton County police officers and sheriff’s deputies were called to the scene on Livingston Drive on December 9. During the incident, Hale reportedly told Johnson to leave and allegedly threatened to retrieve a firearm.

Body camera footage captured a deputy advising Hale to consider the alleged squatter’s perspective, saying, “Everybody isn’t as fortunate as you to have a bed. All the little things, a bed in their house, food in the kitchen.”

The responding deputy wrote in the incident report that Hale had “executed an illegal eviction and forcibly removed Ms. Johnson’s belongings.”

Cell phone video evidence allegedly recorded Hale saying, “Leave before I get my gun.”

Hale was subsequently arrested, spending a night in jail under conditions she described as deplorable. “I spent the night on a mat on a concrete floor in deplorable conditions. While this woman, this squatter, slept in my home,” Hale told WSB-TV Atlanta.

Meanwhile, Johnson, the alleged squatter, has not been charged with any criminal activity.

This case highlights ongoing tensions in Georgia’s property laws, particularly regarding the rights of property owners versus those of occupants who claim tenancy.

Despite the court ruling in Hale’s favor, the lack of a signed writ of possession meant she could not legally enforce the eviction.

Hale’s arrest has drawn attention to the challenges homeowners face when dealing with individuals occupying their properties.

While she awaits further legal proceedings, questions remain about the balance between protecting property rights and adhering to eviction procedures.

The situation has sparked debate over how law enforcement handles such cases, with some questioning the deputy’s approach and the broader legal framework that allowed the alleged squatter to remain in the home despite Hale’s ownership being upheld in court.

Read More at RVM News

Big Government, Uncategorized

Report: Jill Biden Is Urging Joe To “Burn The Whole Thing Down”

As Joe Biden nears the end of his presidency, his final weeks in office have been a mix of farewell gestures, holiday traditions, and simmering tensions with former allies within the Democratic Party.

Both he and First Lady Jill Biden have taken steps that suggest a focus on settling political scores, reshaping relationships, and preparing for life outside the White House.

Biden recently sparked controversy with his decision to pardon his son, Hunter Biden, just weeks before the end of his term.

The move, which came after months of public statements suggesting he wouldn’t intervene, has reportedly angered senior Democrats.

Alongside this pardon, Joe quietly commuted around 1,500 sentences, including one for an individual connected to the Chinese Communist Party, raising further questions about the administration’s actions in its waning days.

Sources close to the administration claim that Jill Biden has been a significant influence in urging the president to take bold steps during his final weeks. “Jill views Democrats on Capitol Hill, the wider party, the Obamas, staff inside and outside the White House, the media, and all of Washington, D.C., with such misguided resentment that I can’t imagine she [isn’t] encouraging [Joe] to burn the whole thing down,” an insider shared.

Among the Bidens’ perceived adversaries is former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who led efforts earlier this year to convince Biden to drop out of the 2024 presidential race.

Despite decades of friendship, the president has reportedly severed communication with Pelosi, who was notably seated far from the Bidens during the Kennedy Center Honors this month—a marked contrast to her past appearances as a guest of honor.

Kamala Harris has also found herself on shaky ground with the president.

Despite Biden’s swift endorsement of Harris following his withdrawal from the 2024 race, tensions between the two have grown after her defeat by Donald Trump in the presidential election.

Harris lost both the popular vote and the Electoral College, a result that has left Biden reportedly questioning how her campaign failed despite significant financial support.

Democratic donor John Morgan speculated that Biden’s endorsement of Harris may have been partly motivated by frustration with party leaders like Pelosi and Barack Obama, both of whom had reservations about Harris’s candidacy. “I think he got pissed off [and] said, ‘F*** you,’ and gave us Harris,” Morgan remarked.

The Bidens’ final holiday season in the White House has been noticeably subdued.

Fewer parties have been held for staff and supporters, and the president and first lady spent the early part of December overseas.

Some Democratic members received White House tour invitations in lieu of traditional party invites.

During a recent White House women’s health conference, Jill Biden made remarks that many interpreted as a jab at Harris’s campaign slogan centered on “joy.”

Her comments drew laughter from the audience, further fueling speculation about discord within the administration.

With the presidency winding down, Biden is reportedly considering establishing his presidential library in Delaware.

Jill Biden, meanwhile, announced her retirement from teaching, ending her tenure as an English professor at Northern Virginia Community College.

However, the Bidens have made it clear they intend to remain active in the public sphere. “We’re no longer going to be President and First Lady, but we’re not going away,” Biden stated recently.

Amid these plans, some Democratic donors are said to be withholding support for Biden’s post-presidency endeavors, citing frustration over his handling of the 2024 race.

Nonetheless, the Biden family continues to strengthen relationships elsewhere, including with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, whose foundation contributed $250,000 to Ashley Biden’s wellness center in Philadelphia.

As Biden prepares to leave the White House, the administration’s final weeks are a reflection of both its achievements and the challenges that have defined his presidency.

While some celebrate his legacy, others within the Democratic Party are left questioning the choices made in his final chapter.

Read More at RVM News

Big Government, Uncategorized

FBI’s Chris Wray Isn’t Out Of The Woods, Jim Jordan Is Seeking Accountability

FBI Director Christopher Wray announced his resignation on Wednesday, stating he would step down at the end of January.

The announcement marks the end of his tenure leading the bureau during a time of heightened scrutiny and controversy.

Former President Donald Trump quickly named his pick for Wray’s replacement, selecting Kash Patel, a known Trump ally with experience in the Department of Defense and as a senior advisor to the Director of National Intelligence.

While some welcomed Wray’s resignation, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee and a vocal critic of Wray, made it clear that the FBI director’s departure does not absolve him of accountability.

Speaking to Fox News Digital, Jordan celebrated the news but reiterated his commitment to ongoing oversight of the bureau.

Jordan described Wray’s resignation as “great” news and criticized his tenure, pointing to what he called significant missteps.

“I mean, Chris Wray was, you know, investigating moms and dads who show up for school board meetings. He was putting out a memorandum on saying, ‘If you’re a pro-life Catholic, you’re an extremist.’ The FBI retaliated against whistleblowers who came and gave us that kind of information. We learned yesterday that they were spying on congressional staffers and their metadata. And of course, he raided President Trump’s home,” Jordan said.

The Ohio congressman has overseen multiple investigations into the FBI and Department of Justice through the Judiciary Committee, many of which have focused on allegations of political bias and misconduct under Wray’s leadership. Jordan emphasized that the work of holding the FBI accountable is far from over.

When asked whether his committee’s oversight of Wray’s handling of the bureau would continue, Jordan replied, “Oh, yeah.”

He added that additional reports from the inspector general could soon shed light on further issues within the FBI.

“And there’s, we think, reports coming that are going to, you know, shed even more light on what’s been going on down line from the inspector general,” Jordan told Fox News Digital.

Jordan’s comments come amid ongoing frustration among some pundits and observers over the perceived lack of consequences for alleged wrongdoing exposed by congressional investigations.

Critics argue that despite revelations of misconduct, little accountability has been enforced during the past several years.

The landscape of federal law enforcement and justice oversight could shift significantly if Donald Trump, who has announced his intention to seek another term in the White House, returns to office.

Trump’s proposed appointments include Kash Patel as FBI director and former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi as the head of the Department of Justice.

Supporters of these moves anticipate a more aggressive approach to addressing what they view as the politicization of the justice system.

With new leadership in key positions, they hope to see accountability measures enacted to prevent similar controversies in the future.

As the transition unfolds, all eyes will remain on the House Judiciary Committee and other oversight bodies to ensure transparency and fairness in the FBI and beyond.

Read More at Red Voice Media

Uncategorized

Joy Reid Unleashes Absurd Rant Over Campaign Ads

MSNBC’s Joy Reid is at it again. During a recent episode of The ReidOut, Reid compared Republican ads from the 2024 election cycle to propaganda tactics employed by the Nazis during World War II, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

This jaw-dropping statement highlights how detached Reid—and by extension, MSNBC—has become from the concerns of everyday Americans.

It’s hardly surprising that rumors suggest MSNBC’s president may soon step down. After all, the network continues to sink deeper into irrelevance. With commentary like this, it’s no wonder viewership has dwindled.

The network’s inability to connect with its audience is a self-inflicted wound, as evidenced by Reid’s rant.

During her segment, Reid lamented Tennessee’s law banning “gender-affirming care” for minors, a case currently before the Supreme Court. She claimed the law reflects an “age-old tradition” of targeting transgender individuals, likening it to Nazi Germany’s atrocities in the 1930s.

She didn’t stop there. Reid also criticized Republicans for spending $215 million on so-called “anti-trans” ads, including prominent spots from the Trump campaign, and accused them of exploiting Americans’ “fear of the transgender community.”

Parents have expressed genuine concerns about ideologies influencing their children through schools, entertainment, and government. The recent election results reflect a clear stance from Americans, signaling opposition to policies they believe overstep boundaries regarding cultural and social issues.

Yet, Reid and her liberal allies refuse to grasp this reality.

She also attempted a wildly misplaced comparison, claiming more children are exposed to gun violence (an estimated three million) than there are transgender Americans of all ages.

According to Reid, this makes the GOP’s focus on trans issues not only misguided but somehow akin to Nazi-era policies. While one might expect inflammatory rhetoric from Reid, invoking the horrors of the Holocaust to score political points is a new low, even for her.

This nonsense underscores why many Americans are tuning out MSNBC altogether. People are tired of being lectured by pundits who view them as backward for rejecting extreme ideologies.

The ads resonated because they addressed real parental concerns, not because they incited baseless fear.

MSNBC may need to reevaluate its programming as some viewers express frustration with divisive commentary. The network risks further alienating its viewership without adjustments to address audience concerns.

Read More at RVM News

Uncategorized

Fetterman’s Remark About DeSantis Vote Sets Internet Ablaze

Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman couldn’t resist poking fun at Florida Governor Ron DeSantis after reports surfaced that President-elect Donald Trump is considering DeSantis as a potential pick for Secretary of Defense.

The buzz comes amid claims that Trump’s team might ditch their earlier choice, former Fox News host Pete Hegseth, due to hurdles in securing his Senate confirmation. According to the Wall Street Journal, Trump casually floated DeSantis’ name during a recent chat at Mar-a-Lago, as reported by MSN.

Taking to X (formerly Twitter), Fetterman weighed in with his signature mix of humor and snark. “I’ll consider a YES on him if he finally admits to his boots with 4″ lifts,” the senator quipped, referring to a popular internet conspiracy about DeSantis allegedly wearing height-boosting insoles.

The online theory, which gained traction during DeSantis’ brief presidential bid, scrutinized the peculiar shape of his boots. Social media sleuths speculated that the governor might have used lifts to appear taller—a potential edge when standing next to Trump, who towers at 6’3”.

https://twitter.com/SenFettermanPA/status/1864319176422109205

Fetterman’s jab resonated with many of his followers, who reveled in the lighthearted commentary.

The speculation surrounding Trump’s Cabinet picks remains a hot topic, but the spotlight on DeSantis comes with an extra dose of drama. If nominated, DeSantis would have to navigate a confirmation process that could expose both allies and detractors within the Senate. Meanwhile, Fetterman’s playful post ensures the online conversation keeps buzzing.

Read More at RVM News

Other

ESPN’s Stephen A Smith Torches Biden And The Dems: “You’re Full Of It”

ESPN commentator Stephen A. Smith delivered a fiery critique of Joe Biden’s decision to pardon his son, Hunter Biden.

Smith accused the outgoing president of dishonesty and political maneuvering after Biden announced the controversial pardon just days before leaving office.

Joe Biden issued a statement on Sunday explaining his decision to pardon Hunter Biden, who was convicted earlier this year on federal gun charges and tax evasion charges.

Hunter was scheduled to be sentenced on December 12 and December 16 for the respective charges.

Biden described his son’s prosecution as “unfair” and claimed that political motivations had influenced the legal proceedings.

“I believe in the justice system, but as I have wrestled with this, I also believe raw politics has infected this process, and it led to a miscarriage of justice — and once I made this decision this weekend, there was no sense in delaying it further,” Biden said in the statement. “I hope Americans will understand why a father and a President would come to this decision.”

Smith, however, did not hold back in his criticism, accusing Biden of being disingenuous in his explanation.

“Respectfully, to the president of the United States, specifically as it pertains to that statement, you’re full of it,” Smith said. “I’m going to look right here, over the national airwaves, and look the president of the United States in the face and say, ‘You’re full of it.’”

Smith acknowledged the personal nature of Biden’s decision as a father but took issue with the Biden’s lengthy justification.

“I said weeks ago, you’re damn right you should let him off. He’s your son, and he’s a recovering addict, and he’s battled those demons for years,” Smith said.

“The fact that you let your son off, I totally understand. Donald Trump would have let his son off. Anybody would have, or at least most people. I understand that. That’s not the issue, sir.”

The commentator added that Biden could have made his case simply by standing by his son without providing an elaborate explanation.

“All you had to say was, ‘That’s my son. I have the power to pardon him, to grant him clemency, whatever. That’s what I’m doing. You all kick rocks.’ That would have been good enough for me,” Smith stated. “But what’s all of that other stuff you said about him?”

Smith further criticized the timing of the pardon, noting that Biden issued it only after the election and as President-elect Donald Trump prepares to take office.

“You didn’t talk about this then. As a matter of fact, you specifically said you wouldn’t pardon your son … before the election. You’re announcing it now that we know Donald Trump is coming in and about to be sworn in as the 47th president,” Smith said. “You were intending to do this all along, which again is no problem. But it doesn’t make you any less full of it.”

Smith argued that Biden’s reversal damaged the credibility of the Democratic Party, which had spent years criticizing Trump over legal issues.

“Because when you look at Donald Trump and how the Democrats went after him … you do understand the Democrats are no longer in a position to say anything, right? You can talk till the cows come home. You’re whistling into the wind. Nobody wants to hear what you have to say right now,” Smith said.

He concluded by saying Biden’s actions undermined trust in the presidency and harmed the American people.

“All you had to do was say, ‘He’s my son. I can’t let him go to jail,’” Smith said. “What’s the matter with y’all?”

Biden’s decision to pardon Hunter has sparked criticism from both sides of the political spectrum, with many questioning the implications of his actions for public trust and accountability.

Read More at RVM News

Election, Ethics, Uncategorized

DNC Union Launched A GoFundMe To Support Furious Laid Off Staffers

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) union has launched a GoFundMe campaign to raise $25,000 for staffers laid off following significant election losses.

As of now, the campaign has raised $16,000, but the union’s frustration with DNC leadership is evident, with many criticizing the lack of severance pay for the workers who dedicated hours to electing Democrats.

Peter Doocy reported on “Fox & Friends” Monday morning, highlighting the union’s statements and their ongoing efforts to support the laid-off staffers. “The organizer of this DNC union GoFundMe says we are heartbroken to see our colleagues who dedicated countless hours to electing Democrats up and down the ballot depart under these circumstances, and we are furious with DNC leadership for failing to provide severance to those affected as they fundraise,” Doocy said.

The union’s frustration stems from what they view as a lack of support from the DNC, both financially and emotionally, in the wake of the election losses.

As Doocy pointed out, the campaign’s organizers are hopeful that additional funds will come from either the DNC or unemployment assistance, but that possibility remains uncertain.

Steve Doocy raised a point of concern, questioning how the layoffs were handled considering the DNC’s recent election defeat. “Peter, got a quick question for you, given the fact that the Democrats had an epic loss in the race for that building behind you, the DNC union people didn’t see layoffs coming where they were going to get one day’s notice,” he asked.

Peter Doocy responded, clarifying that the DNC union staff had not expected the layoffs to occur so suddenly and with minimal notice. “Doesn’t sound like it. No, and they are about $16,000 of a $25,000 goal. It doesn’t seem like there that people who donated a lot of money for months, even just 10, $15 at a time, on those recurring payments that you get the text messages about constantly in an election season,” Doocy explained.

“It doesn’t seem like there’s much of an appetite for people to open their wallets again for that, or for the Harris campaign that now needs Tim Walz to go out and ask for help.”

The DNC’s financial struggles may signal broader challenges within the party, as the union’s GoFundMe campaign remains relatively stagnant.

The union’s reliance on donations from past supporters, many of whom donated during the election season, appears to be insufficient in meeting their immediate needs.

Ainsley Earhardt joined the conversation, raising concerns about the number of people affected by the layoffs. “How many people were fired? I know it was two-thirds. Do we know the exact numbers? I feel like $25,000 to help people pay their rents and their bills is not that much if it’s hundreds of people,” Earhardt asked.

Peter Doocy responded by explaining that the union sees the $25,000 goal as a temporary solution, noting that they are hopeful for further financial support either from the DNC or from unemployment assistance programs. “They’re saying that the $25,000 is temporary, because they still think they’re going to be able to get some kind of money out of DNC or some kind of employment unemployment assistance, and so it’s temporary,” Doocy said. “They had a protest at Union Station yesterday. It was pretty small.”

The layoffs and the GoFundMe campaign are part of a larger narrative surrounding the Democratic Party’s struggle to regain footing after a difficult election cycle.

As the DNC grapples with financial and organizational issues, questions are arising about how they plan to recover and what steps, if any, they will take to address the concerns of their laid-off staffers.

In the broader political landscape, discussions surrounding President-elect Donald Trump’s appointments and the potential for new initiatives are gaining attention.

As Doocy mentioned, “The Trump team is filling out their cabinet. The President-Elect is reportedly trying to place Kash Patel in a high-ranking DOJ or FBI job. And Elon Musk, who is hiring right now with Vivek Ramaswamy for the DOGE government waste project, is said to be on the lookout for an AI Czar.”

Read More at RVM News


Scroll to Top