Author name: Peter Zambelli

News

Arizona Supreme Court Evacuated After Suspicious Package Tests Positive for Explosives

The Arizona Supreme Court and several nearby government offices in downtown Phoenix were evacuated Monday morning after a suspicious package discovered in a courthouse mailroom tested positive for explosive material, according to state authorities, as reported by The New York Post.

The package was found at approximately 8 a.m. inside the Arizona Supreme Court building.

The Arizona Department of Public Safety said in a statement that the package contained multiple vials, two of which tested positive for what officials described as an “unspecified homemade explosive substance.”

As a precaution, DPS ordered the evacuation of multiple state offices in the area, including the Arizona State Courts building, the Arizona Department of Education, the Arizona Attorney General’s Office, and the Arizona Department of Administration.

Officials confirmed that the Supreme Court was not in session at the time the package was discovered.

Following the evacuation, authorities closed the courthouse and began extensive security sweeps of the building. The package remained inside the facility for several hours as bomb technicians assessed the threat and prepared it for removal.

According to AZ Family, a trained technician wearing full protective gear was later seen carrying the package out of the Supreme Court building.

The device was placed into a spherical containment unit designed to safely transport explosive materials. A police motorcade then escorted the container to a secure location, where authorities planned to detonate it safely, the outlet reported.

Officials worked through the afternoon to ensure the building was secure. DPS said the courthouse and surrounding offices were cleared for reentry at approximately 3:30 p.m. Employees were told they could return to work in the building on Tuesday.

Alberto Rodriguez, a communications director for the Arizona Supreme Court, described the evacuation process and the uncertainty employees faced as the situation unfolded.

“When they notified all staff that we needed to evacuate, I think there was a lot of questions that we didn’t necessarily know about, speaking as a general employee of the Supreme Court. We’re just following directions,” Rodriguez told AZ Family.

He added that the incident hit close to home for court employees.

“I don’t want to speak on behalf of any of my colleagues, but personally, it’s just one of those things where it doesn’t feel good when it gets to your workplace. You hear about it all the time, but it’s unfortunate that it reached the Arizona Supreme Court, where we had to have this evacuation,” Rodriguez said.

Authorities have released limited information about the package. DPS has not said where the package originated, who may have sent it, or whether it was capable of detonating without intervention.

Investigators also have not announced whether the incident is being treated as a targeted threat against the court or a broader security concern.

No injuries were reported during the evacuation or the subsequent removal of the package. DPS said the investigation remains ongoing as officials work to determine the source and intent behind the suspicious delivery.

News

Machete-Wielding Suspect Shot Dead by Police at New Jersey Home, Three Victims Found Inside

Police in New Jersey shot and killed a man armed with a machete during a confrontation at a Piscataway home Monday evening, an incident that led authorities to discover three people dead inside the residence, as reported by The New York Post.

According to the Middlesex County Prosecutor’s Office, officers were dispatched to a home on River Road in Piscataway at approximately 5:30 p.m. following a 911 call reporting an individual with a knife.

Law enforcement sources told WABC that when officers arrived, an unidentified man charged toward them while wielding a large blade.

Sources told Fox 5 that the weapon was identified as a machete. Officers attempted to stop the suspect by deploying tasers, but those efforts were unsuccessful, according to WABC.

Authorities said the man continued advancing toward officers with the weapon, prompting police to open fire. The suspect was pronounced dead at the scene.

After the shooting, officers conducted a search of the home and discovered three people dead inside, authorities confirmed.

The victims have not yet been publicly identified. A source told WABC that two of the victims were grandparents.

The identity of the third victim and the relationship between the suspect and the deceased individuals have not been released.

Officials said the causes of death for the three victims were not immediately clear late Monday. Investigators have not disclosed whether the victims were killed prior to police arriving or if they died during the unfolding incident.

The Middlesex County Prosecutor’s Office did not immediately respond to media requests for additional details late Monday evening.

The office, along with the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office, is handling the investigation into both the police-involved shooting and the deaths discovered inside the home.

Piscataway Township Police said the incident appears to be isolated and that there is no ongoing threat to the public. In a statement posted on Facebook, the department said there was no danger to the surrounding community following the incident.

“We are aware of the horrific crime in Middlesex County tonight. All our members that were involved are being evaluated. Thank you to all who have reached [out] to offer support,” New Jersey State PBA President Peter Andreyev said in a statement.

Authorities have not released further information about the suspect, including his age or identity, and have not indicated whether any prior calls for service were associated with the residence.

Investigators also have not announced a timeline for releasing additional details as the case develops.

The investigation remains active as officials work to determine what led up to the confrontation with police and the deaths of the three individuals found inside the home.

News

Parents of Man Killed After Crawling Into Delta Jet Engine Sue Salt Lake City

The parents of a Utah man who died after crawling into the engine of a Delta Air Lines aircraft at Salt Lake City International Airport have filed a lawsuit against Salt Lake City, alleging that a series of security failures allowed their son to access the tarmac during what they say was an obvious mental health crisis, as reported by The New York Post.

Kyler Efinger, 30, was found dead on New Year’s Day 2024 after climbing into the turbine of a Delta plane that was preparing for takeoff at the airport.

His parents, Judd and Lisa Efinger, allege in a lawsuit filed last Tuesday that their son’s death could have been prevented if airport personnel had intervened earlier and if security systems had functioned properly.

According to the complaint obtained by The Post, Efinger, a ticketed passenger traveling to visit his ill grandfather, was experiencing what the lawsuit describes as an “obvious mental health episode” in the hours before his death.

Efinger had been diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder a decade earlier and “occasionally experienced episodes in which he became visibly disoriented,” the filing said.

The lawsuit states that at around 9 p.m., Efinger began pacing repeatedly along a walkway inside the terminal.

Less than 30 minutes later, he entered a Utah Jazz store, where his behavior was so unusual that a manager accepted less than the full purchase price for a jersey to “hurry up the transaction,” according to the filing.

Efinger left his bag in the store, prompting the manager to call Airport Operations.

The complaint alleges that Efinger then ran through the terminal without shoes, his shirt partially unzipped, as an airport employee arrived to retrieve the bag.

The manager reported hearing Efinger yell that his bag was being held “hostage” and that his “whole life is in there.”

After demanding a refund and becoming increasingly agitated, the lawsuit says the manager and an associate called airport security, at which point Efinger ran toward gate A1 without his bag.

Despite his behavior, the complaint alleges that no additional steps were taken to locate or assist him.

At approximately 9:52 p.m., Efinger attempted to open a locked jet bridge door while carrying his shoes.

He briefly interacted with a janitorial worker and then tried to open another locked door, falling in what the filing described as an “exaggerated manner.”

He later struck a window with his shoe before accessing an emergency exit door that led from the terminal’s sterile area to the secure tarmac.

That door, the lawsuit alleges, lacked a delayed egress locking system that would have required a 15- to 20-second wait before opening.

“The City did not maintain any impediments to prevent a visibly disoriented person from freely accessing the tarmac,” the lawsuit stated, adding that airport personnel were not immediately alerted to Efinger’s exit location.

Efinger walked nearly a mile across the airfield, eventually removing his pants and undergarments in freezing conditions, leaving him wearing only a jersey and socks.

He then ran toward an Airbus aircraft that had begun taxiing. The lawsuit claims city personnel failed to warn air traffic controllers or pilots that a “disoriented person” was on the tarmac.

Efinger climbed into the aircraft’s engine while it was still running. His hair was caught by the engine blades, and he was killed by “blunt head trauma from his head being forcibly pulled against the blades of the engine,” according to court documents.

Although the pilot shut down the engine after noticing Efinger, the lawsuit says the fatal injuries had already occurred.

Efinger’s parents argue that he would still be alive “if officers had located him 30 seconds sooner.”

They are seeking damages exceeding $300,000 and a jury trial, accusing Salt Lake City of failing to maintain safe premises, adequate security systems, and effective communication protocols.

A spokesperson for the Salt Lake City mayor’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

News

JD Vance Delivers a PSA for Everyone Saying the Maduro Operation Was ‘Illegal’

Nicolás Maduro is now in U.S. custody in New York City, awaiting his first in-person appearance in an American court after U.S. special forces carried out an early-morning operation in Venezuela on Saturday to extract him and his wife, Cilia Flores.

Both were indicted in the Southern District of New York on multiple federal charges.

President Donald Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth addressed the operation publicly Saturday morning, outlining the actions that led to the capture and transfer of the Maduros to the United States.

The White House also released a series of photographs showing senior officials monitoring the operation as it unfolded in real time.

The capture immediately reshaped the political landscape surrounding Venezuela, where questions remain about who will lead the country in the short and long term.

One of the most prominent opposition figures to Maduro’s rule, María Corina Machado, issued remarks after the news broke, stating her view on who should assume the presidency on an interim basis.

However, no definitive leadership transition has yet been announced, and the long-term direction of the Venezuelan government remains unsettled.

While Venezuelan opposition figures and many Venezuelans abroad reacted positively, political reaction in the United States was sharply divided. Several Democratic officials criticized the operation, characterizing it as unlawful and unauthorized.

Among the most vocal critics was newly sworn-in New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, a Democratic Socialist, who contacted the White House to object to the action.

Members of Congress also issued statements calling the operation “illegal” and labeling it an unauthorized act of war.

Vice President J.D. Vance responded directly to that criticism, defending both the legality and necessity of the operation.

In public remarks following the initial reporting, Vance said the administration had offered Maduro multiple opportunities to avoid the outcome that ultimately occurred.

The Vice President praised the U.S. military’s execution of the mission, stating, “Kudos to our brave special operators who pulled off a truly impressive operation.”

Vance then addressed claims that the operation violated U.S. law, issuing what he described as a public service announcement directed at critics.

“And PSA for everyone saying this was ‘illegal,’” Vance said.

“Maduro has multiple indictments in the United States for narcoterrorism. You don’t get to avoid justice for drug trafficking in the United States because you live in a palace in Caracas.”

Federal court records show that Maduro has been charged in connection with large-scale narcotics trafficking and related offenses, allegations that U.S. officials have cited for years in characterizing his regime as criminal rather than legitimate.

Attorney General Pam Bondi’s office has made the full list of charges publicly available through the Southern District of New York.

As images from the White House situation room circulated, some observers questioned why Vice President Vance did not appear in photographs released during the operation or attend the President’s public remarks.

Fox News White House correspondent Aishah Hasnie later reported that Vance had met with President Trump earlier Friday in West Palm Beach to discuss the strikes and participated in the operation remotely.

According to the report, Vance was not physically present at Mar-a-Lago during the operation but joined via a secure video connection and returned to Cincinnati after the mission concluded.

Fox News also reported that the White House is limiting the physical co-location of the President and Vice President when they are away from Washington due to heightened security considerations.

The administration has emphasized that the operation was narrowly focused on apprehending an individual already facing U.S. indictments, rather than initiating a broader military campaign.

Officials have stated that Maduro was given multiple opportunities to step aside or resolve his legal exposure through other means before the operation was carried out.

With Maduro now detained in New York, attention is shifting to the upcoming court proceedings and the political consequences inside Venezuela.

Meanwhile, Rubio and other senior officials continue to engage with regional partners as the United States prepares for the next phase following Maduro’s removal from power.

News

Marco Rubio Channels His Inner Biggie Smalls While Explaining How Trump is Different

Senator Marco Rubio said Nicolás Maduro repeatedly ignored opportunities to avoid confrontation and instead chose actions that directly threatened the national interests of the United States, prompting decisive action under President Trump.

Speaking after the events of the night, Rubio framed the situation as the result of deliberate choices by Maduro, arguing that generous alternatives had been offered and rejected. He said those decisions ultimately led to the outcome now facing Venezuela’s leader.

“But I want to be clear about one thing, Nicolas Maduro had multiple opportunities to avoid this,” Rubio said.

“He was provided multiple very, very, very generous offers, and chose instead to act like a wild man. Chose instead to play around, and the result is what we saw tonight.”

Rubio said the broader message extends beyond Venezuela and should be understood by leaders around the world who believe they can test U.S. resolve without consequences.

He described Maduro as part of a pattern of foreign actors who, in his words, “like to play games,” assuming that nothing serious will happen.

“The other message here is the following,” Rubio said.

“You have a guy, like many people around the world, they like to play games. You have a guy who decides he’s going to invite Iran into his country. Is going to, you know, do the confiscation of American oil companies, is going to flood our country with gang members, is is going to take Americans prisoner and try to hold them for hostage and trade them like he was able to do with the Biden administration.”

Rubio said Maduro’s actions reflected a belief that the United States would not respond forcefully, a belief he said was rooted in past experiences.

He argued that assumption no longer applies under the current administration.

“Basically likes to play games all this time and thinks nothing’s going to going to happen,” Rubio said.

“And I hope what people now understand is we have a president, the 47th president United States, is not a game player.”

Rubio emphasized that President Trump operates differently from previous leaders, describing him as someone who follows through on commitments rather than relying on rhetoric.

Drawing on his own experience in Washington, Rubio said he has watched administrations talk about action without delivering results.

“When he tells you that he’s going to do something, when he’s going to tell you he’s going to address a problem, he means it. He actions it,” Rubio said.

“I can tell you, I’ve watched this process now for 14-15, years, been around it. Everybody talks. I’m going to do this. I’m going to do this. I’m going to do that. When I get there, we’re going to do this.”

Rubio said the difference, in his view, is that President Trump acts when he identifies a threat.

He expressed frustration that foreign leaders still fail to grasp that reality.

“This is a president of action like I don’t understand yet how they haven’t figured this out,” Rubio said.

“And now, if you don’t know, now you know, because this is the way it’s going to play out.”

He added that the response was not about speeches or symbolic gestures, but about addressing a direct threat to the United States.

“And I think people need to understand that this is not a president that just talks and does letters and press conferences,” Rubio said.

“And you know, if he says he’s serious about something, he means it, and this is something that was a direct threat to the national interest of the United States, and the President addressed it.”

Rubio also described President Trump as someone who prefers peace but will not tolerate provocation.

He said Maduro could have chosen a different path entirely.

“There’s a president of peace, by the way,” Rubio said.

“This guy had multiple opportunities to find his way somewhere else and figure out another he could have been living somewhere else right now, very happy, but instead he wanted to play big boy.”

According to Rubio, the lesson should be clear for other leaders watching closely.

“I think that the message here should be for the world,” Rubio said.

“Look, the President doesn’t go out looking for people to pick fights with. He’s not. Generally wants to get along with everybody. Well, talk and meet with anybody, but don’t play games.”

Rubio concluded by warning that testing President Trump carries real consequences.

“Don’t play games with this President’s in office, because it’s not going to turn out well,” Rubio said.

“And so I hope that you know, you know, I guess that lesson was learned last night, and we hope it will be instructive moving forward.”

WATCH:

News

Former Viking Jack Brewer Describes High-End Somali Spending Tied to Alleged Minnesota Fraud

Former Minnesota Viking and University of Minnesota football player Jack Brewer said he has witnessed a dramatic demographic and economic transformation in Minnesota over nearly three decades, including what he described as high-end business activity involving members of the state’s Somali population and growing concerns about fraud tied to taxpayer-funded programs.

Brewer, who later became a business owner after his NFL career, said his experiences came through direct business dealings and personal connections in the state.

“You go to one of them, and they have Bentley and Maserati dealerships in Minnesota. I know because I’ve done business with them, and I’ve been endorsed by them as an athlete,” Brewer told Fox News Digital.

“Now, you go in there, and some of their main customers are these Somali fraudsters buying high-end cars in a state that gets four months of sunlight and decent weather.

They’re driving around sports cars like you would see in Beverly Hills or South Beach Miami, all off the back of the American taxpayer,” he said.

Brewer said his observations coincided with a rapid increase in Minnesota’s Somali population, which began in the early to mid-1990s as refugees fled Somalia’s civil war following the collapse of the country’s government in 1991.

He said he first noticed the change roughly 28 years ago, long before his professional football career.

At the time, Brewer was a child growing up in Grapevine, Texas. By the time he transferred from Southern Methodist University to the University of Minnesota, the Somali population in the state was estimated at approximately 15,000 people, according to the Minnesota State Demographic Center.

That number continued to grow through the 2000s.

By the time Brewer joined the Minnesota Vikings in 2002, at least 5,123 students in Minnesota reported speaking Somali as their primary language at home, according to data cited by the National Institutes of Health.

Brewer said his perspective is informed by his personal life as well. He is married to a Muslim American legal immigrant whose family came to the United States from the Middle East.

“I have been in Minnesota a long time. My wife was born and raised there, from a family of immigrants that came from the Middle East, came to America, assimilated and not just assimilated but actually made me more patriotic,” Brewer said.

“I saw Somalians coming there in droves. They had their own section of town and slowly started taking over the city of Minneapolis,” he said.

As his career progressed and he became involved in endorsements and business transactions, Brewer said he observed increased wealth and cultural influence among some Somali residents, including what he described as visible changes in Minneapolis.

“You turn on your TV. Have you ever seen a mayor on television waving a foreign country’s flag and dancing and trying to rally people to support Somalia over supporting America?” Brewer said.

“When you walk through Minneapolis, you hear Islamic sirens going off because they’ve come in here with that culture, trying to bring in Islamic culture.”

“This is a spiritual battle like we haven’t seen in a long time,” he added.

Recent scrutiny of Minnesota intensified following investigations into alleged fraud involving taxpayer-funded programs.

Activists Ryan Thorpe and Christopher F. Rufo reported that federal counterterrorism sources confirmed millions of dollars tied to Minnesota’s Medicaid Housing Stabilization Services program, Feeding Our Future, and other state-sponsored organizations were sent to Somalia, and that terrorist group Al-Shabab may have obtained some of the funds.

According to reporting cited by Thorpe and Rufo, approximately 40% of households in Somalia receive remittances from abroad.

In 2023, the Somali diaspora sent an estimated $1.7 billion to Somalia, exceeding the Somali government’s budget for that year.

Brewer said political influence has followed demographic growth, pointing to the rise of Somali elected officials in Minnesota.

Those include U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, state senators Omar Fateh and Zaynab Mohamed, and St. Louis Park Mayor Nadia Mohamed, all Democrats.

“These people have embedded themselves into the political world, where now they are leveraging the federal government to fund their campaigns, to send money overseas to Somalia and to build luxury condos and create a lifestyle for people in Somalia off the back of the American taxpayer,” Brewer said.

“For me, as a former Minnesota Viking, as a former Gopher, I got my undergraduate and my master’s degrees from the University of Minnesota. I was a captain on both of those teams. It’s one of the most embarrassing times I’ve ever had for a state that I’ve proudly said helped turn me from a boy into a man,” he said.

Brewer said he has reduced his business exposure in Minnesota in recent years.

“I’ve pulled back many of my investment interests in the state and moved business interests elsewhere because of what we’ve seen post-George Floyd,” he said.

Some Somali residents have pushed back against broad characterizations of the community.

Jaylani Hussein, executive director of the Minnesota chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, previously told Fox News Digital, “Somalis in Minnesota are hard-working folks. Many of them work two jobs, and yet about 75% are still poor.”

“There are entrepreneurs, successful restaurants — people in trucking, IT and even corporate America — making significant changes. But those positive stories don’t get much attention,” Hussein said.

Data from Minnesota Compass shows that about 36% of Somali Minnesotans lived below the poverty line from 2019 to 2023, compared to the national rate of 11.1%. Somali-headed households reported a median income of roughly $43,600 during that period, compared with a national median of $78,538.

Najma Mohammad, a hair stylist who came to the United States as a child, previously told Fox News Digital, “Most people think just because some people are bad and Somali, that every Somali is bad, which is just a stereotype.”

Brewer said he continues to support Muslim legal immigrants who embrace American values, citing his own family.

“Witnessing their family — the way they do business, the way they love this country, what they stand for, their patriotism — I’ve learned from it. I’ve become better from it. I’ve loved my country more from witnessing my in-laws,” Brewer said. “So, I know what’s possible.”

“They did that by moving to Minneapolis and building their businesses. It can happen, and it does happen. That’s what this country was built upon,” he said.

At the same time, Brewer said he believes stronger action is needed at the federal level.

“I would put a freeze on all immigration until we get a handle on the depth of this fraud and the depth of the corruption that has taken place,” Brewer said.

“We need to get all these foreign terrorists out of our country. That should be a collective effort between our armed forces, our local law enforcement, our communities, our leaders, our churches — everyone — to protect our land.”

News

Byron Donalds Calls Out Senate Dems Blocking Proof of Citizenship Vote

Florida Rep. Byron Donalds is calling out both Senate Democrats and the Republican-controlled Senate for blocking the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, legislation that would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register and vote in federal elections.

The SAVE Act passed the House of Representatives in April by a narrow 216–208 vote. Republicans were unified in support, joined by four Democrats: Reps. Ed Case of Hawaii, Henry Cuellar of Texas, Jared Golden of Maine, and Marie Perez of Washington. Despite House passage, the bill has not advanced in the Senate.

The legislation would amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require documentary proof of citizenship for participation in federal elections.

Under current law, voters are not required to present proof of citizenship, such as a U.S. passport or a REAL ID, when voting for president, the U.S. House, or the U.S. Senate.

According to the bill text, states would be prohibited from processing voter registrations unless applicants provide proof of citizenship.

Acceptable documentation would include a REAL ID–compliant driver’s license, a U.S. passport, or a certified birth certificate paired with a government-issued photo ID.

The bill would also require states to actively remove noncitizens from voter rolls using federal databases, including the Department of Homeland Security’s Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements system and Social Security Administration verification tools.

The SAVE Act would mandate that states establish voter eligibility verification programs within 30 days of enactment.

Federal agencies would be required to provide citizenship data to state election officials within 24 hours of a request at no cost.

The legislation also includes criminal penalties for election officials found to have knowingly registered noncitizens.

The Department of Homeland Security would be tasked with investigating and potentially deporting any noncitizen found to be unlawfully registered to vote.

Senate Democrats have publicly opposed the bill.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said on the Senate floor in April that no Democrat would support the SAVE Act and described it as a threat to the Democratic Party’s future.

Schumer labeled the legislation “voter suppression” and compared it to Jim Crow laws.

“The kind of legislation, the kind of executive orders, which are so jaundiced, so slanted on the side of one party, are the antithesis of democracy,” Schumer said.

He continued, “On the other, Republicans in Congress are pushing the SAVE Act, one of the most destructive, dangerous voter suppression bills in recent memory. It is very reminiscent of Jim Crow.”

Schumer added, “They want to not only restore Jim Crow in the south, they want to have Jim Crow spread from one end of this country to the other. It will not happen. It will not happen. Let me be clear. I will not let this noxious bill, the Save Act, become law. Every Senate Democrat, every single one of us is united against it. They need 60 votes. The SAVE Act is dead on arrival.”

Utah Sen. Mike Lee weighed in publicly, posting on X that, “The SAVE Act, which requires proof of citizenship to register and vote in federal elections, passed the House in April. The Senate should send it to President Trump’s desk for signature ASAP. Do you agree?”

Donalds responded by criticizing the Senate’s failure to act and pressing for immediate passage. “The SAVE Act ensures ONLY US CITIZENS can vote in US elections,” Donalds said.

He added, “LAST YEAR: @HouseGOP PASSED The SAVE Act, but Senate Dems blocked us. 264 DAYS AGO: @HouseGOP PASSED The SAVE Act again, but it’s held-up in the Senate. I agree with @SenMikeLee—It’s time to PASS THE SAVE ACT NOW!”

Elon Musk responded to the exchange by writing, “This is essential.”

Donalds later called for eliminating the filibuster to advance the legislation.

“Eliminate the Filibuster. Pass The Save Act. Put the AMERICAN PEOPLE FIRST. ONLY US CITIZENS should be able to vote in US elections,” he said.

Last month, President Donald Trump again urged Republicans to terminate the filibuster to move election-related legislation forward as negotiations continued over reopening the government.

“The Democrats are cracking like dogs on the Shutdown because they are deathly afraid that I am making progress with the Republicans on TERMINATING THE FILIBUSTER!” Trump said in a statement. “Whether we make a Deal or not, THE REPUBLICANS MUST ‘BLOW UP’ THE FILIBUSTER, AND APPROVE HUNDREDS OF LONG SOUGHT, BUT NEVER GOTTEN, POLICY WINS LIKE, AS JUST A SMALL EXAMPLE, VOTER ID (IDENTIFICATION). Only a LOSER would not agree to doing this!”

In a later post, Trump again wrote, “TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER!”

The President has repeatedly called on Senate Republicans to invoke the nuclear option to pass voter ID requirements and other election measures, arguing that Democrats will eventually do the same.

“I wouldn’t have been in favor of that a long time ago, but you know, the Democrats are going to do that,” Trump said.

“So why aren’t we doing it?”

 

News

TSA Whistleblower Claims Somalians Flew Suitcases of Cash Out of MSP for Years

A former Transportation Security Administration agent says she repeatedly witnessed suitcases filled with millions of dollars in cash being transported through Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, raising alarms about long-running failures by authorities to intervene despite what she described as a clear and consistent pattern.

Liz Jaksa, who worked as a TSA agent at MSP for five years, detailed what she said were frequent encounters with Somali men traveling in pairs and carrying large amounts of cash through airport security.

Speaking with journalist Liz Collin, Jaksa said the first discovery left a lasting impression.

“Suitcases filled with millions of dollars of cash, and the couriers were always small. He meant traveling in pairs, and they got through the checkpoint. It just really, absolutely blew my mind. The first time you open a suitcase and you see millions of dollars of cash,” Jaksa said.

According to Jaksa, the encounters followed a consistent process.

TSA agents would pull the bags aside, open them in private screening rooms, and confirm the contents were stacks of cash.

Law enforcement officers would then verify identification, which Jaksa said created a record that could still exist.

“Typically, what would happen is Leo or a law enforcement officer would come check their credentials. I don’t know what kind of questions they ask them, but, but their IDs were always documented, and probably their plane tickets as well,” she said.

“So there is a trail of that out there, and I would believe, with all the cameras at the airport, that if they started there, they could probably find each and every individual that brought money through the checkpoint.”

Collin pressed Jaksa on the frequency of the activity, noting the scale involved.

“Obviously, this seems suspicious, if not alarming, given what seems to be a pattern here. So you’re talking about millions of dollars flying out of Minneapolis. And you think it it happened about every week or so. Is that right?” Collin asked.

Jaksa said the activity appeared routine. “So it certainly seemed like it happened every week,” she said.

“Um, the suitcases came in and it was, it was always the M.O. was always too. Somalian men traveling in pairs, um, sometimes they both had suitcases.”

Based on her years at the airport, Jaksa estimated the total amount of cash moved through MSP was staggering.

“In the five years I was there, I believe a billion dollars went through the airport,” she said.

Collin noted that the allegations went beyond cash alone.

“$1 billion as if this isn’t troubling enough. Liz, it’s not just money you watched leave. MSP, is that right?” she asked.

“Yes, that is correct,” Jaksa replied. She described a separate incident involving travel documents.

“There was another instance, again, a small man that had a carry on luggage filled with brand new passports, and he was allowed to get through the checkpoint. So where he went with those passports is anybody’s guess.”

Jaksa said she raised concerns at the time but felt the response was indifferent.

Reflecting on the situation years later, she said the broader fraud now coming to light made those experiences clearer.

“I didn’t feel good about it then and now. It certainly all makes sense,” she said.

Collin referenced reporting that linked Minnesota fraud to terrorism financing and asked Jaksa whether her firsthand experience aligned with those findings.

“Judging by what you saw for yourself during the time you were a TSA agent, do you think there’s any truth to this?” Collin asked.

“Absolutely knowing what I know now, absolutely, there’s no question in my mind that that money went to Al Shabaab,” Jaksa said.

Jaksa said the lack of urgency at the time has been difficult to process.

“Well, it’s been uncomfortable because at the time, seems so lackadaisical that these people could get through the airport with all that cash time after time after time. It wasn’t a one time thing,” she said.

She also expressed frustration with current state leadership, arguing that accountability is long overdue.

“It was frustrating when I was a TS agent, and it’s certainly frustrating now watching the state’s administration doing what they what they’re doing,” Jaksa said.

“You know, Walz and Omar, honestly, they should both resign and shame.”

Jaksa said she chose to speak publicly because she believes Minnesotans deserve to know what she witnessed.

“Because I think Minnesotans need to know that billions of dollars left through the airport, and it was it was cash, it was literally suitcases full of cash,” she said.

Asked what message she would send to state leaders, Jaksa said the situation should never have been allowed to continue.

“That this just should not be allowed to happen when they come through the airport. Absolutely should not be able to bring suitcases full of cash who goes with millions of dollars in a suitcase, week after week, time after time, year after year, and all Somali people.”

WATCH:

News

Gavin Newsom’s Multi-Billion Dollar High Speed Rail Scam Continues: Scott Adams

Scott Adams criticized California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s handling of the state’s high-speed rail project, focusing on billions of federal dollars that were allocated to the project despite no completed construction and unanswered questions about where the money went.

Adams questioned how Newsom could still be viewed as a presidential candidate in light of the project’s outcome and Newsom’s proposal to reduce the scope of the rail plan rather than cancel it.

“All right, listen to this one. So as you know, California got these billions of dollars that were supposed to be from the federal government that was supposed to be spent on the so called high speed rail project,” Adams said.

“As you know, none of that got built after many years. As you also know, nobody can account for where the money went. So the money just disappeared, I.E., got stolen billions and billions of dollars.”

Adams said that anyone in charge during that period would face obvious questions about accountability and competence.

“So if you were the governor, or you were in charge in any way during that time, how do you explain where all the money went, and then still become president, because it’s so obvious that there’s either massive incompetence, maybe, or just theft, or both,” he said.

Adams then described Newsom’s proposal to keep the project alive by reducing its size rather than canceling it outright.

“So here’s what Newsom has proposed, that instead of canceling the project because they don’t have any money, and they have no way to get that money back, and there’s it would cost five times more than they thought to build it,” Adams said.

“So there’s no real possibility of building the thing they have funded for just none.”

He said Newsom’s approach was intended to avoid returning the federal funds.

“But instead of canceling the project, he’s trying to extend it and make it a smaller project, something that you could imagine, and probably only in your imagination, they could actually build,” Adams said.

“And the reason that he would want to keep it alive is that if he builds nothing, and he says, I’m not going to build anything, he has to give back the money, or at least he has to give back what maybe was left.”

Adams said Newsom’s plan was designed to keep the funds from being returned.

“So in order to not have to give back any money, he’s going to pretend that there’s still a live project, and it’s just much smaller, Holy f**king sh*t,” Adams said.

“You know, it’s probably legal. You know, it’s more of a weasel legal thing to do.”

Adams questioned how such actions would not disqualify Newsom from national political ambitions.

“But how in the world can you do something like this and still become considered to be a presidential candidate?” Adams said.

He suggested the issue would not reach or influence voters who might support Newsom.

“The only way is if, is if people like me know about it, but I wasn’t going to vote for him,” Adams said.

“And the people who might like him and might vote for him will never hear this story. They will never hear this story.”

Adams said even if the issue were raised publicly, he doubted it would change Democratic voters’ views.

“And even if you brought it up and people heard it for the first time,” Adams said.

“Let’s say, let’s say his competition brought it up at a debate or something. It’s sort of technical, and, you know, I’m not sure it would make any difference to a Democrat.”

He said Newsom could dismiss the issue by framing it as a policy difference rather than wrongdoing.

“And if he has some excuse, like, I don’t know what they’re talking about, we just need a train between these two places, and we have the money. Why wouldn’t we build it?” Adams said.

“So the Democrats could easily be convinced that there’s no real problem here.”

Adams said Newsom could argue there was no criminal conduct involved.

“And he would say, am I indicted for anything? No, is it a crime? No, we’re just doing things differently than Republicans would do them. There’s no crime in that,” Adams said.

He concluded by expressing disbelief that the issue would receive little scrutiny.

“So he could probably, very easily dismiss it in a debate, the news will probably let him have a pass, and it’s just unfrecking believable,” Adams said.

“Wow.”

WATCH:

News

Democrats’ Entire Playbook of Welfare Cash for Illegal Aliens Called Out by Brandon Gill

U.S. House of Representatives for Texas’s 26th Congressional District, Brandon Gill accused Democrats of operating what he described as a corrupt welfare-based patronage system that misuses American tax dollars and, in some cases, may have allowed funds to be diverted overseas to extremist groups.

Gill said recent estimates suggest taxpayer money connected to U.S. welfare programs may have been funneled to Al-Shabaab terrorists in Somalia, calling the situation a serious national concern that Democrats have failed to confront.

“There’s estimates now that this money could have been funneled to Al Shabaab terrorists in Somalia,” Gill said.

“I hope that Democrats jump on board and recognize what a severe problem this is for the American people.”

Gill argued that welfare spending has become a political tool rather than a safety net, alleging it is used to reward political allies and secure long-term voter loyalty.

“But you know, welfare for Democrats is a way of taking American tax dollars, giving it to their political allies,” he said.

“It is a patronage system. It is you vote for me, and I will take other people’s money and give it to you, and I don’t care if it’s fraudulent. I don’t care if you shouldn’t be getting it, as long as you vote for me.”

According to Gill, this approach prioritizes political power over accountability and encourages fraud within government programs.

“That’s the goal,” he said.

Gill said the consequences extend beyond individual cases of misuse, arguing that the practice damages the country’s broader social and economic foundations.

“You know, I hope that Democrats recognize how unbelievably corrupt This is, how it undermines our entire social system, our entire economic system, and gets on board,” Gill said.

“But, you know, they’ve been pretty hesitant to do that so far.”

He further accused Democrats of pursuing an immigration strategy designed to cement permanent political advantage.

“The Democrat playbook has been import as many unassimilable foreigners as they possibly can, get them on the dole and ensure that these people vote Democrat for life,” Gill said.

“That’s what we’re up against here.”

WATCH:


Scroll to Top