Author name: Martin Tribe

LGBTQ+

‘What a Bigot!’ CNN’s Anderson Cooper Misgenders a Non-Binary Lawyer Leaving Sanders Stunned – Internet Claps Back

CNN got trapped in its own machinations when host Anderson Cooper misgendered a nonbinary Civil Rights attorney, leaving Democratic Senator Bernie Sanders’ jaws wide ajar. Cooper was hosting the network’s town hall event featuring the United States Senator for Vermont when he introduced a they/them pronoun-using liberal activist as a woman.

I want to introduce Grace Thomas. She is a local civil rights attorney. She is a Democrat, right?” Cooper said.

“They/them pronouns, actually. Thank you,” Thomas said.

The pronoun slip hit Sanders’ 107-year-old brain like a brick from the blues, leaving him stunned and scowling so hard that he must have popped a vein.

Undoubtedly, Cooper made an honest mistake since they/them pronoun-using individuals do not wear pronoun labels to help the rest of humanity know how to address them in advance. The least they could do is tattoo their pronouns on their forehead to make life easier for everybody. 

For the curious folks out there, it remains unclear if Thomas was born a woman or had transitioned. Those with that information will also tell you that disclosing someone’s gender except their preferred one is a violation of privacy.

Interesting to see if they will cancel Cooper for making the same mistake every commonsense-using person does regularly and pays dearly for it. Recently, a Christian nurse was suspended for addressing a transgender convicted pedophile as “Mister.”

Nonetheless, conservative netizens had a field day with the CNN host for misgendering a non-binary host, which, by now, should be against the network’s policies.

“CNN’s Anderson Cooper gets corrected after misgendering a civil rights attorney at a town hall event with Bernie Sanders. Wow, what a bigot. Lmao,” posted Trending Politics co-founder Collin Rugg.

Riley Gaines, an outspoken former collegiate female athlete who competed against transgender athlete Lia Thomas in 2022, called for Cooper’s immediate resignation. West Virginia recently passed the Riley Gaines Act, which was inspired by a 14-year-old who refused to compete against a transgender opponent.

“Calling for Anderson Cooper’s immediate resignation for believing what his eyes were telling him he saw Bigot,” she X’ed.

Similarly, conservative political commentator Gunther Eagleman encouraged Democrats to continue fighting over pronouns to make GOP the party of choice for logical Americans. 

“Anderson Cooper just misgendered a Civil Rights attorney. They are not serious. Keep on putting the pronoun police on camera, we will win every election.”

Meanwhile, transgender rights remain a divisive issue among Democrats, with some feeling that the party has strayed too far from reality and alienated many American voters. 

During the 2024 election campaigns, Trump saw an opportunity and capitalized on it to paint Kamala as a far-left liberal whose values clashed with most Americans’.

“Kamala is for they/them; President Trump is for you,” Trump’s ad claimed.

However, those in the far-left want to double down on trans rights, risking splitting the party.  They even tried to cancel California governor and potential 2028 Democratic presidential frontrunner Gavin Newsom when he said allowing trans athletes in women’s sports was “deeply unfair.”

LGBTQ+

Nurse Suspended for Calling Racist 6-Foot Transgender Pedophile “Mister” – Cue the Racial Slurs

In another case of woke gone amok, a Christian female nurse was suspended for refusing to refer to a convicted biological male pedophile as a woman. The man was convicted of sexually abusing multiple boys whom he catfished online while posing as a girl. He currently serves a prison sentence in a maximum security prison.

Yet, liberals continually refuse to acknowledge that individuals who assume a different gender from that assigned at birth pose a significant danger to society. 

In this case, Jennifer Melle, 40, said she was suspended by St Helier Hospital in Carshalton, London, after disclosing that the NHS Trust had taken a disciplinary action against her for refusing to use preferred pronouns when caring for a convicted male pedophile who identifies as a woman. Jennifer apparently referred to the 6-foot biological male pedophile as “Mister.” 

Additionally, the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) declared her a “potential risk” for refusing to acknowledge the convicted felon’s gender identity. She also disclosed that the pedophile racially abused her for misgendering him.

“How about I call you n*****?… Yes, black n*****!” He blurted.

According to the Christian nurse, the NHS institution suspended her for breaching the convicted pedophile’s patient confidentiality by disclosing his gender. In a world that operates on common sense, a person’s gender should not be a secret and can be determined with the naked eye. 

Similarly, no one should lose a career they have spent decades building for using the wrong pronouns. Surprisingly, a pronoun slip also takes priority over racial abuse, which is clearly prohibited by the UK’s Public Order Act 1986 and Crime and Disorder Act 1998.

Nonetheless, Jennifer said she has been repeatedly targeted after she expressed her Christian beliefs, suggesting that the case was a pretext to finally get rid of her. Surprisingly, the woke NHS is willing to get rid of a self-sacrificing nurse to protect the feelings of a trans pedophile who loves hurting children for self-gratification.

“Ever since I expressed my Christian beliefs under extreme pressure, I have been a marked woman,” Jennifer told the Christian Concern. “Despite being the one placed at risk, I am the one being punished. I have been made to feel like a criminal.”

Consequently, the nurse is seeking legal redress with the help of the Christian Legal Centre, which seeks to safeguard the freedom of Christians in a continent that is rapidly descending into tyranny. The advocacy group demands an apology and immediate reinstatement of Jennifer without endless investigations, whose outcome is usually hard to guess in cases like these.

“The NHS has become so entrenched in transgender ideology that it is willing to side with a man brought in from prison in chains —who was openly shouting racist abuse—over a Christian nurse,” noted Christian Legal Centre chief executive Andrea Williams.

Meanwhile, the Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch has thrown his weight behind her and decried her treatment for stating obvious biological facts. UK voters should restore common sense to the political class by voting out woke parliamentarians who pass these abhorrent laws.

“She has my full support. It’s time the Government pulls its finger out and intervenes to make it clear no one should be punished at work for stating biological reality to paedophiles,” Badenoch said.

Here in the United States, several teachers have also lost their jobs after refusing to use students’ pronouns. Early this year, Jackson Local School District paid a Christian teacher $450,000 to settle a wrongful termination lawsuit stemming from her refusal to use the preferred pronouns of two self-declared transgender students. Similarly, West Point School Board settled a similar lawsuit for $575,000.

Uncategorized

Scott Jennings Schools Leftists on the Differences between Illegal Immigrants and American Citizens

CNN’s token conservative voice, Scott Jennings, reality-checked Democrats who are fearmongering about ongoing Trump’s mass deportations. The left has been lying to American citizens, telling them that they could be picked up on the streets and deported to some of the most brutal prisons in El Salvador.

One such fearmonger, civil and criminal attorney Donte Mills, appeared on CNN’s show alongside Jennings and attempted to perpetuate the same narrative. He claimed that the administration could deport American citizens by accident and that “it could happen to anybody,” allowing the former special assistant for George W. Bush to educate him. 

Jennings started reminding Mills that American voters gave Trump the mandate to deport illegal immigrants. Trump campaigned on border security and promised to conduct the largest mass deportations in history, making illegal immigration a losing issue for Democrats.

“Americans overwhelmingly voted for it. And it’s not particularly a controversial matter,” Jennings set the record straight.

“And that’s what the administration clearly communicated to the American people in the election.”

“They overwhelmingly voted for it. And it’s not particularly a controversial matter.”

He also schooled the leftie on the differences between illegal immigrants and legal citizens, which Democrats attempt to blur to push their false narrative.

“You’re conflating legal American citizens with people who came here illegally. We do this all the time in these debates.”

“I think what the administration is trying to do is be as aggressive as possible at deporting different kinds of populations. 

“One, people who’ve committed heinous, violent crimes. Number two, people that were violent before they came here.”

According to a recent Pew Research Center study, an overwhelming majority (97%) of Americans support deporting violent illegal immigrants. Two-thirds of Americans, including half of Democrats, also support deporting all illegal immigrants in the country.

“Number three, anyone who came here illegally, I mean, look, I’m sorry, but if you came here illegally, no matter how well-intentioned you were, there’s probably a decent chance you’re going to be sent back,” Jennings continued.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt had schooled journalists that anybody who entered the country illegally was a criminal and subject to deportation because the Trump administration was focused on enforcing all laws, including immigration laws.

“And if you are an individual, a foreign national, who illegally enters the United States of America, you are, by definition, a criminal,” she stated.

However, the Trump administration started by deporting the most violent criminals, whom the Democrats characterized as innocent undocumented individuals looking for better opportunities, such as crop pickers. 

Liberal judge James Boasberg even ordered the Trump administration to return Tren de Aragua gang members into the country, against the wishes of most Americans. However, the Supreme Court blocked the restraining order given by the liberal judge, whose articles of impeachment were filed in the Senate. 

Democrats also overwhelmingly voted against the Laken Riley Act, which aims to protect Americans’ lives by detaining illegal immigrants who are arrested, charged, or convicted for various crimes, such as burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting, to prevent them from being released on the streets and committing even more grievous crimes. 

The law was inspired by Laken Riley, a nursing student who was murdered by a violent illegal immigrant, arrested for various crimes, and released due to lack of similar laws allowing the detention of illegal immigrants undergoing prosecution.

Despite Americans clearly stating that they want to secure their country, Democrats are undoubtedly siding with criminals instead of Americans who elected them.

Democrats, LGBTQ+

Teen Vogue Article: Trump’s Trans Surgery Ban for Minors is a ‘Death Sentence’

A Teen Vogue article warns that Trump’s executive order against chemical and surgical gender transition for minors puts them at risk of death.

On January 28, 2025, President Trump signed the “Protecting Children From Chemical And Surgical Mutilation” order, banning the chemical and surgical mutilation of individuals under 19 years of age.

The EO says the government will “not fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called ‘transition.’” It also directs the government to “enforce all laws that prohibit or limit these destructive and life-altering procedures.”

Citing a debunked study, the writer says Trump’s order gravely endangers children with gender dysphoria by putting them at risk of self harm. 

The argument stems from a 2024 Trevor Project study of 61,000 trans individuals between 2018 and 2022, when 48 anti-transgender laws were enacted across 19 states. It found that “anti-transgender laws significantly increased incidents of past-year suicide attempts among transgender and nonbinary youth by as much as 72%.”

“I don’t want to mince words here: stripping trans youth of their gender affirming care is a death sentence,” Angelica Christina Torres, a Stonewall Inn board member, said in an interview published on Teen Vogue.

She argued that preventing transgender kids from undergoing irreversible medical interventions exposes them to bullying, thus pushing them towards depression and self harm. 

“These Executive Orders create an even larger target on their backs for cisgender students to continue attacking and harming transgender youth, further pushing them towards self harm, depression, anxiety, PTSD, and in some cases, suicide,” Torres said. “Gender affirming care is often the only shred of hope and joy that our vulnerable youth can hold onto.”

“Gender-affirming care is lifesaving, and I can personally speak to that experience,” said the “proud alumni of the nation’s first fully accredited LGBTQIA+ high school, The Harvey Milk High School.”

However, conflicting studies have found that the risk of self-harm for transgender students increased two years after they underwent “chemical and surgical” sex-change operations.

In particular, a more recent and extensive study of 107,583 patients published by The Journal of Sexual Medicine found that individuals who received chemical and medical interventions for sex change exhibited “significantly higher” rates of depression, anxiety, substance-use disorders, and suicide two years after the operation.

“Mental health outcomes included depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, substance use disorder, and body dysmorphic disorder, assessed over two years post-surgery using clinician-verified ICD-10 codes.”

Depression rates among male subjects who medically or chemically changed their sex more than doubled (25%) compared to those who did not transition (11.5%).  Anxiety rates among the same group of males also more than quadrupled (12.8%) compared to those who remained intact (2.6%).

Similarly, women who chemically/surgically transitioned reported higher rates of depression (22.9%) compared to those who did not undergo medical interventions (14.6%). These negative outcomes were reported two years after the subjects had medically transitioned, thus suggesting long-term effects or lifetime regret for mutilating their bodies.

The study recommended “ongoing, gender-sensitive mental health support for transgender individuals’ post-surgery.” Undoubtedly, children suffering from gender dysphoria could benefit from the same mental health support and care without the need for medical mutilation to reduce the risk of suicide.

Meanwhile, Trump’s executive order warned that children who transitioned must face the “horrifying tragedy” of being unable to have their own children. They also face a lifetime of health complications and skyrocketing medical bills to address various health problems introduced by the highly invasive procedures.

Additionally, gender transition also comes with unexpected sobering realities for which the children are likely unprepared, thus pushing them towards self harm. 

National Affairs

Kamala Harris’s Husband Doug Emhoff In Shame After His Law Firm Bent the Knee to Trump

Doug Emhoff, husband of former Vice President and failed Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris, has found himself in an embarrassing position after his law firm bent the knee to Trump. Emhoff’s situation compares to his wife’s, who was forced to certify Trump’s victory and her own defeat.
Shortly after Biden exited the White House, the former second gentleman was offered a partnership at Willkie, Farr & Gallagher law firm, unaware of the direction the company would take.

However, the Trump administration recently targeted law firms that worked with the Biden administration in persecuting him by signing the “Preventing Abuses of the Legal System and the Federal Court” executive order. The EO aims to hold lawyers and law firms that “engage in actions that violate the laws of the United States or rules governing attorney conduct” accountable.

“For instance, in 2016, Marc Elias, founder and chair of Elias Law Group LLP, was deeply involved in the creation of a false ‘dossier’ by a foreign national”  “to provide a fraudulent basis for Federal law enforcement to investigate a Presidential candidate” to “alter the outcome of the Presidential election,” the EO stated.

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP also worked pro bono with the office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller to prosecute January 6 protesters, and Trump responded by suspending its members’ active security clearances and blacklisting it from doing business with the federal government.

Willkie, Farr & Gallagher LLP was also among the law firms that targeted Trump and his allies. Willkie Farr and O’Melveny & Myers LLP worked pro bono alongside liberal nonprofits such as Protect Democracy and Checks and Balances and the Niskanen Center think tank to challenge the construction of the Trump Wall. The law firm also worked to restore the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program and won a $148 million defamation lawsuit against Rudy Giuliani on behalf of two Georgia poll workers. It also hired an investigator to probe Trump’s alleged involvement in the January 6 protests.

However, the law firm recently reached a deal to forget the past and work with Trump by ending its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) hiring policies, offering pro bono services to the president worth at least $100 million, and representing clients who have historically been underrepresented by woke law firms.

Willkie Farr was among three high-profile law firms that reached such an agreement, while over 500 others have challenged various Trump’s executive orders on law firms, terming them “a grave threat to our system of constitutional governance and to the rule of law itself.” 

However, Emhoff wanted to stop the law firm from working with the Trump administration, possibly to save himself the embarrassment, but was overruled.

“Speaking at a charity gala dinner Thursday night in Los Angeles, former second gentleman Doug Emhoff condemned the decision by his law firm to preemptively come to an arrangement with the Trump administration to avoid an executive order targeting the firm, sources tell CNN.”

“Emhoff told the crowd at the Annual Dinner Gala for the legal aid group Bet Tzedek he had told the firm he wanted to fight the threat of an executive order he found unconstitutional but had been overruled, the sources said.”

Willkie Farr’s co-managing partner, Thomas M. Cerabino, said the agreement was “consistent with our Firm’s views on access to Legal representation by clients, including pro bono clients, our commitment to complying with the Law as it relates to our employment practices, and our history of working with clients across a wide spectrum of political viewpoints.” Since the agreement, Cerabino said the law firm “hit records on all of our primary metrics.”

While Willkie Farr’s decision to work with the Trump administration was likely financially motivated, others’ refusal only exposes their hypocrisy and political bias, proving that, yet again, Trump was right.

LGBTQ+

Gov. Newsom Backtracks, Defends California’s Radical Transgender Policy

California Governor Gavin Newsom has backpedaled and defended his state’s radical left transgender policy. The Golden State has numerous appalling transgender laws, including one that prohibits school districts from requiring teachers to notify parents when their children choose a different gender than the one assigned at birth based on biological sex.

Previously, Gov. Newsom had stated that allowing transgender athletes in women’s sports was “deeply unfair” and that Democrats should own and acknowledge it, adding that the “issue of fairness [in sports] is completely legit.”

Appearing on HBO’s Real Time with Bill Maher, Gov. Newsom started on the right foot by describing his party as “judgemental” and “toxic” and urging it to mature on trans issues.

However, Maher called him out for the role he has played in entrenching the radical-left transgender ideology in California and nationwide. On July 15, 2024, Newsom signed the Support Academic Futures and Educators for Today’s Youth (SAFETY) Act or AB1955, which is one of a kind nationally. 

It prohibits teachers from notifying parents without the child’s consent or requirement by law when the student changes their gender, uses facilities designated for the opposite gender, or participates in activities traditionally associated with the opposite biological sex.

“What do you say to people who say, ‘Well, this all sounds very good. But governor, you were the poster boy for a lot of this [woke] stuff’?” Maher asked.

Referring to Trump’s criticism of California’s law that prohibits teachers from reporting students’ gender identity changes, Maher said the Republican Party had managed to convince many Americans that it was the most reasonable option.

“That’s the kind of thing — even though it doesn’t affect a lot of people — that makes a lot of people go, ‘Well, you know what? That’s the party without common sense.’”

Like a true Democrat, Newsom misrepresented the facts by claiming that teachers were fired for failing to report students’ gender identity issues. However, it introduces additional legal requirements for teachers to inform parents of any gender identity changes, thus making it riskier for them to report. Teachers are now more likely to lose their jobs or face additional legal consequences for reporting gender changes, essentially silencing them.

“I just disagree with that. I mean, the law was you would be fired, a teacher would be fired if a teacher did not report or snitch on a kid talking about their gender identity,” he claimed. “I just think that was wrong. I think teachers should teach. I don’t think they should be required to turn in kids.”

Despite Maher’s attempt to set the record straight, Newsom rumbled on relentlessly to reinforce the false narrative and drown out the facts. 

“What is the job of a teacher? It’s to teach. If Johnny’s talking about some identity issue or some issue about liking someone of the same sex, is it the teacher’s job to then report that?” Newsom asked. “In this law, the teacher can still do that. But they can’t be fired if that’s not what they do. I just think that was fair. I don’t think that’s inappropriate.”

Meanwhile, Newsom faces a political dilemma where adopting a commonsense approach to trans rights could cost him the primaries, while doubling down could cost him the election, like Kamala. The California governor had already acknowledged that trans rights was a losing issue, and Kamala’s reluctance to address them infuriated him more.

“It was devastating,” Newsom lamented. “And she didn’t even react to it, which was even more devastating.”

Meanwhile, the Department of Education is investigating California for violating parental rights under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), which guarantees parents access to their children’s records.

“It is not only immoral but also potentially in contradiction with federal law for California schools to hide crucial information about a student’s wellbeing from parents and guardians,” Education Secretary Linda McMahon said.

Entertainment

Woke Backlash: ‘Snow White’ Producer’s Son Blasts ‘Narcissistic’ and ‘Immature’ Rachel Zegler for Hijacking Father’s Film with Personal Politics

For the longest time, Disney has weathered the woke backlash until the recently released remake of the 1937 film Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, which attempted to capitalize on the classic film’s popularity. However, politics and woke ideology got in the way, making it one of the worst financial disasters in the film industry.

Thanks to Rachel Zegler, the once-enchanting Disney princess who portrayed the feminine character of a damsel in distress is now a Latina strong and independent woman who inspires feminists. Zegler had described the original film as “dated” and the Prince as a “stalker” and vowed to modernize the film. 

After introducing major changes, Snow White garnered brutal reviews on every platform, translating to fewer people hitting theaters to watch the film. 

The widespread frustration has spread beyond the audience to the production crew and their families, resulting in a scathing rebuke by one of the producer’s sons. Snow White producer Jonah Platt’s son posted a blistering comment about Zegler, blaming her for the film’s appalling performance.

“Yeah, my dad, the producer of enormous piece of Disney IP with hundreds of millions of dollars on the line, had to leave his family to fly across the country to reprimand his 20-year-old employee for dragging her personal politics into the middle of promoting the movie for which she signed a multi-million dollar contract to get paid and do publicity for,” Jonah said in a now-deleted post.

Besides the appalling woke-ideology-filled remake, Zegler had posted a “Free Palestine” post and attacked Donald Trump supporters after he won the 2024 elections. Jonah suggests that these political statements undermined Snow White’s success. 

“This is called adult responsibility and accountability. And her actions clearly hurt the film’s box office. Free speech does not mean you’re allowed to say whatever you want in your private employment without repercussions.”

Jonah added that Zegler hijacked the efforts of tens of thousands of people who worked on the film “for her own immature desires,” risking the careers of those who depended on its success.

“Narcissism is not something to be coddled or encouraged,” he continued.

Besides Zegler, award-winning actor Peter Dinklage also rejected a role in the film, calling the original portrayal of the Seven Dwarfs “stereotypical”. It forced Disney to resort to subpar CGI, further frustrating the audience.

Zegler, who played Snow White, also performed very poorly, lacking the warmth and charm of the original Disney princess. Her performance felt stiff and bland, likely perfectly portraying feminist qualities. 

Nonetheless, Zegler believes Snow White’s production was excellent, describing the experience as a “life-changing” one that helped her “became a real adult.” She also still thinks that she is winning despite the backlash.

“People will wait in line despite my flaws,” she posted.

Meanwhile, Israeli-born actress Gal Gadot, who played the Evil Queen character, maintained a low profile after the film debuted. She was prominently missing from the behind-the-scenes photos that Zegler posted on Instagram.

In the Instagram post, Zegler said that “it takes a village to bring stories like Snow White to the big screen.” Seemingly, that village does not include most Americans who are tired of having woke ideology shoved down their throats by corporations that likely think they are too big to fail.

Meanwhile, Snow White continues to struggle to recoup its production costs in the face of the massive silent boycott. The Wrap reported that the film earned just $16 million from 4,200 theaters on its first day. 

It also earned $43 million in domestic ticket sales and $44 million internationally, totaling about $87 million out of an estimated $250 million in production costs.

On the popular movie review site Rotten Tomatoes, Snow White continues to fall, currently rated at 41%, while the IMDB audience rated it 1.6 out of 10. Seemingly, Snow White is turning out to be a “Bud Light” moment for Disney and the film industry as a whole.

Democrats

California Democrats Block a Bill to Keep Men Out of Women’s Sports and Locker Rooms

Barely a month after California governor Gavin Newsom said that allowing transgender athletes – biological men who identify as women – to participate in women’s sports was deeply unfair, Democrats have steered the state in the opposite direction.

On March 22, California Assembly Democrats voted unanimously to block the hearing of “AB 844: Educational equity: sex-segregated school and athletic programs and activities: use of facilities” bill that would have enforced gender-segregated sports and locker rooms.

“This bill, notwithstanding any other law, would require that a student’s participation in sex-segregated athletic programs and activities and use of facilities, including bathrooms, locker rooms, showers, overnight accommodations, and student housing at a postsecondary institution be based upon the student’s sex,” AB44 reads in part.

Assemblyman Bill Essayli (CA-R-63) introduced the proposal to protect girls from potential predation by men exploiting gender identity to access their private facilities. He lamented the Democrats’ disregard for logic and the will of most American voters.

“Assembly Democrats care more about allowing biological boys into girls’ sports and locker rooms than protecting our daughters — this defies all common sense,” Assemblyman Essayli said.

“The vast majority of Californians and all Americans agree: keep boys out of girls’ sports. Assembly Democrats are radically out of touch with common sense Californians, and the voters will hold them accountable to restore justice and fairness in girls’ sports.”

California Democrats also removed Assemblyman Essayli from all committees for proposing the removal of sanctuary protections for illegal immigrants.

Meanwhile, Gov. Newsom has not issued a public statement about the bill or his party members’ unanimous decision to block its vote despite previously signaling support for fairness in women’s sports. Nonetheless, he had suggested handling the transgender issue carefully, claiming that gender non-conforming individuals are more likely to commit suicide. This false narrative sharply contradicts a recent study that linked gender affirming care to higher suicide rates.

“There’s also a humility and a grace, that these poor people are more likely to commit suicide, have anxiety and depression. So both things I can hold in my hand,” he said.

“How can we address this issue with the kind of decency that I think is inherent in you but not always expressed on the issue, but at the same time deal with the unfairness?”

However, the threat posed by men who identify as women in women’s sports and locker rooms is well documented. In 2023, a transgender individual who was using women’s bathrooms and locker rooms beat a female student to death in Rivesider, California. Similarly, volleyball player Payton McNabb was severely injured when a transgender opponent spiked a ball so hard on her head that it caused traumatic brain injuries.

Newsom and other Democrats also overlook the mental health impact the inclusion of trans athletes has on sportswomen displaced by their biological male competitors, whom they cannot fairly compete against. In 2023, 27-year-old transgender cyclist Austin Killips won the women’s Tour of the Gila in New Mexico stage race with a whopping 50 minutes and 25 seconds. 

Ada Gallagher, a transgender high schooler, also set records in the 200-meter and 400-meter girls’ races, defeating the runner-up by over 7 seconds in the usually tightly contested race. High school athlete Margaret Oneal, who ranked second behind a transgender runner, said that competing against a “physically stronger” biological male was “discouraging and disheartening” and took a mental toll on her teammates.

Sens. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) also said the inclusion of trans athletes in women’s sports undermines sportswomen in numerous ways.

“To do so would threaten a woman’s physical safety and limit their opportunities for athletic success and scholarships,” Rep. Ernst said. “As a woman and a mother, I am passionate about protecting women and girls, which is why I’m working with my colleagues to pass the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act.”

LGBTQ+

Democrats Start “Informal Conversations” on Transgender Issues, Suggest Pretending to Welcome a “Range of Thoughts”

Democrats are beginning to address their radical transgender policy which is in direct conflict with over three-quarters of American voters.

According to a New York Times/Ipsos Survey, 79% of Americans, including 67% of Democrats say that transgender athletes should not be allowed in women’s sports. Similarly, 71% of Americans, including 54% of Democrats, oppose transgender care such as puberty-blocking drugs and hormone therapy for children under 18 years.

However, when the House passed the bill to ban transgender athletes in women’s sports, only three Democrats crossed party lines, demonstrating the party’s unwillingness to respect the will of most American voters.

Surprisingly, Rep. Sarah McBride, the first openly transgender member of Congress and a vocal trans activist has called for dialog over trans issues. “We have to create more space in our tent. If, for instance, we want to have a majoritarian coalition — not just electorally, but specifically on issues around trans rights — that, by necessity, is going to have to include people who have a range of thoughts,” McBride told NOTUS.

The transgender U.S. Representative also said that going “all in” or against trans rights was unhelpful and risked losing votes, general support, and progress. “A binary choice between being all-on or all-off is not constructive for anyone,” McBride added. “It impedes the very needed path toward winning electorally, winning hearts and minds and, most importantly, winning progress.”

The member of Congress also opposed excommunicating party members who refused to toe the line on various issues, including trans rights. “I think it is an incredibly problematic instinct that many have to excommunicate people who aren’t in lockstep with you on every policy, or even aren’t in lockstep with you on the messaging,” McBride said.

Bear in mind, if Democrats do shift their rhetoric on trans issues, and do start opposing things like men in womens’ sports, they’re just pretending.

Regardless, given how dogmatic the Democratic Party is over the trans issue, it is unlikely that they could reach a middle ground.

Rep. Greg Landsman also disclosed that Democrats were having informal conversations over the issue. Suggesting that the blue party should be more open-minded, Rep. Landsman also acknowledged “that Democrats could be a little judgy and annoying” about trans rights. 

Rightly so, several Democrats have faced backlash after expressing contradicting opinions. Recently, California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) came under fire after correctly stating that allowing trans athletes in women’s sports is “deeply unfair.” 

“I think it’s an issue of fairness. I completely agree with you on that,” Newsom told conservative figure Charlie Kirk. “It is an issue of fairness, it’s deeply unfair. We’ve got to own that. We’ve got to acknowledge it.”

His remarks also caused a storm in his political backyard, with California’s LGBT caucus saying it was deeply sickened by the statement.

“We woke up profoundly sickened and frustrated by these remarks.”

The 2028 potential Democratic Party’s flagbearer also said the party’s position on gender politics contributed to Kamala Harris’ crushing defeat by Donald Trump. He also lamented Harris’ unwillingness to address the issue.

“It was devastating,” Newsom said. “And she didn’t even react to it, which was even more devastating.” 

Earlier, Reps. Seth Moulton (D-MA-6) and Tom Suozzi (D-NY-3) also faced backlash after suggesting that the party had gone too far on the trans issue. Moulton had warned that Democrats were afraid of honestly addressing issues that affect American voters.

“Democrats spend way too much time trying not to offend anyone rather than being brutally honest about the challenges many Americans face,” Moulton told the New York Times.  “I have two little girls. I don’t want them getting run over on a playing field by a male or formerly male athlete, but as a Democrat, I’m supposed to be afraid to say that.” 

But don’t forget, Moulton was one of 224 co-sponsors of the Equality Act that would have added “gender identity” as a protected class to all relevant civil rights statutes

Rep. Souzzi also stated that the Democratic party was pandering to the extreme left, leaving many leaders afraid to speak out. “The Democrats have to stop pandering to the far left,” Suozzi told the New York Times. “I don’t want to discriminate against anybody, but I don’t think biological boys should be playing in girls’ sports. 

“Democrats aren’t saying that, and they should be,” said the former County Executive of Nassau County.

DEI

MGM Casino Marketing Director “Not Going to Hire Whites”

MGM Resorts Marketing Director in Springfield, Massachusetts, Albie Velarde has openly admitted that he would not hire white job applicants in a disgusting show of racism. Velarde was speaking to an undercover O’Keefe Media Group (OMG) investigative journalist when he made the damning admission that racism against white people is alive and well.

When asked to choose between an African American and a white job applicant who were equally qualified for an advertised role, Velarde said he would prefer the former.

“I’d Probably Hire the African American,” he responded.

When pressed on whether he actually did not want to hire white people, Velarde asked whether the applicant was a cultural fit, despite MGM Resorts in Springfield catering to people of all races.

“Because if they [whites] are not, no matter how great they look on paper, they don’t fit well with my team,” Velarde said, further raising questions about the composition of the marketing team.

“So I’m not going to hire them.”

“If our guests cannot connect with our employees, and if they are all white, it just doesn’t resonate the same way.”

“I will purposefully look for those diverse-based hires,” he added.

When asked if race played a role in the company’s hiring decisions, Velarde disclosed that MGM Resorts’ human resource management maintains an inventory of various population demographics and regularly sends a turnover summary. 

“At a [MGM] property level, HR sends us, every month when they send us our turnover summary of the month, they’ll point out this month we lost this amount of females versus males.”

He also admitted that the turnover summary report influenced hiring decisions to maintain diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) through affirmative replacement.

“Hey guys, we’re losing all of our female workforce. Let’s try, you know, let’s put more females through the pipeline.”

“So like if I lose one of my female hosts, I would try to replace her with a female,” Velarde said. “Selena, she’s my Vietnamese host, she’s very reserved, she’s very quiet. But that’s her culture. I would replace her with somebody who is, in some capacity, that culture.”

When asked to respond about the alleged discriminative hiring practices, MGM Resorts said the marketing manager’s claims do not reflect the company’s policies.

“This person did not have hiring authority during his employment at MGM Springfield and these comments do not reflect the company’s policies or practices,” MGM spokesperson stated.

While MGM Resorts denies the allegations, Velarde’s allegations are hardly far-fetched, as most pro-DEI organizations regularly engage in these discriminative hiring practices, thus Velarde likely said the quiet part out loud. In a recently resurfaced lawsuit, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was accused of discriminating against nearly 1,000 air traffic control applicants who aced the Air Traffic Selection and Training (AT-SAT) test because they did not check all the diversity checkboxes.

The lawsuit pertains to a mandatory “biographical questionnaire” the FAA introduced in 2013 in addition to the AT-SAT test, gutting an entire “Qualified Applicant Register” List of pre-qualified candidates who excelled in the technical and cognitive aspects of the test.


Scroll to Top