Author name: Martin Tribe

Culture War

Woke at Home, Silent Abroad: Disney Expands in Anti-Gay UAE While Fighting Florida Over LGBTQ in Schools

/

Leftist Walt Disney Company is looking the other way and building a theme park in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), a Middle Eastern country where homosexuality is illegal and punishable by law. Located on Yas Island, Abu Dhabi, UAE, the theme park will be developed by the Miral Group. 

The group has developed other theme parks and recreational establishments for various American and European brands, including Ferrari, Warner Bros, Etihad, and SeaWorld.

Ironically, Disney went to war with the state of Florida when its legislature passed the “Don’t Say Gay” bill, banning gay porn from schools. Any non-perverted human being, regardless of their sexual orientation or political beliefs, knows that school is the the right place for gay porn. However, Disney stood firm against HB 1557, saying it should never have been passed or signed into law.

“Our goal as a company is for this law to be repealed by the legislature or struck down in the courts, and we remain committed to supporting the national and state organizations working to achieve that. We are dedicated to standing up for the rights and safety of LGBTQ+ members of the Disney family, as well as the LGBTQ+ community in Florida and across the country.”

Then-Disney CEO Bob Chapek even pledged $5 million to LGBTQ organizations and called Gov. DeSantis to warn him that the bill would “unfairly target gay, lesbian, non-binary, and transgender kids and families.” It also launched a blistering legal battle with the Sunshine State to have the law repealed, resulting in the loss of its autonomous status for controlling the Reedy Creek Improvement District.

Nonetheless, Disney is eerily silent about Abu Dhabi’s anti-gay laws and is willing to comply without throwing a tantrum. Surprisingly, the new park will be the seventh in an Islamic government that imprisons gays, including for “consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults” and crossdressing. Why is the left not boycotting Disney?  

“As our seventh theme park destination, it will rise from this land in spectacular fashion, blending contemporary architecture with cutting-edge technology to offer guests deeply immersive entertainment experiences in unique and modern ways,” said Robert A. Iger, Chief Executive Officer, The Walt Disney Company.

Meanwhile, Disney promises that Disneyland Abu Dhabi will be “distinctly Emirati,” suggesting that no gay Disney characters will be featured. In 2022, the UAE banned the Disney-Pixar movie Lightyear for “violation of the country’s media content standards” due to two female characters kissing.

Recently, Disney’s Snow White remake flopped after the company attempted to push diversity and inclusion, resulting in poor reception. Texas GOP Senator Ted Cruz revealed in his “Verdict” podcast that Disney had acknowledged the financial cost of its involvement in woke politics in its 2023 regulatory filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 

“Generally, our revenues and profitability are adversely impacted when our entertainment offerings and products… do not achieve sufficient consumer acceptance,” the company stated. 

“Further, consumers’ perceptions of our position on matters of public interest, including our efforts to achieve certain of our environmental and social goals, often differ widely and present risks to our reputation and brands,” the SEC filing stated.

According to Sen. Cruz, that statement was the embodiment of the phrase “Go Woke, Go Broke,” which other liberal brands, such as Bud Light, embraced and learned the hard way.

“Because what that means, is number one, Disney has lost billions of dollars. The phrase, ‘go woke, go broke,’ Disney has sadly embodied that phrase. I am sure Walt Disney is spinning in his grave at horrors to as what has happened to his namesake,” Sen. Cruz said.

Meanwhile, Disney has also been involved in other DEI initiatives, including alleged race and sex quotas, prompting Stephen Miller’s America First Legal Foundation (AFLF) to file a civil rights complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

AOC, Illegal Immigration

“Tables Have Now Turned”: Homan Hits Back at AOC After Taunting Him and Recent Judge’s Ruling

/

Trump’s Border Czar Tom Homan has hit back at New York Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez after she dared him to arrest her for allegedly impeding the ICE by teaching illegal immigrants how to evade detention. 

Appearing on Fox News’ The Ingraham Angle, Homan mocked AOC for obsessing over the threat because she knew her actions were borderline illegal and could have serious legal consequences.

“I take pleasure [that] I can live in her mind rent-free every day, but we all know exactly what she’s doing,” Homan told Laura Ingraham on Tuesday. 

He reiterated that AOC was helping the worst criminals evade law enforcement. So far, Trump’s deportations have primarily targeted most violent illegal immigrants including rapists, drug dealers, and gang members.

“She’s educating the worst of the worst on how to evade law enforcement.”

However, Homan warned the far-Left Squad member that her antics were jeopardizing the illegal immigrants, as the Trump administration had finally received a favorable ruling to deport illegal aliens.

“But the tables have now turned. She’s educating people how to get prosecuted, because you have a final order,” he said.

“It is illegal to not comply with that order,” he added, noting that it is a crime to defy ICE removal orders or resist its actions when in custody.

“You can’t hinder your own removal that was ordered by the federal judge. I would like AOC to read Title 8, United States Code 1253 because it’s starting tomorrow.”

Title 8 USC 1253(a)(1) requires that illegal aliens with removal orders must strictly comply with ICE or face a fine or prison sentence. By teaching them how to evade ICE detention, AOC is setting them up for intentional defiance, which will ultimately land them in prison.

The spat between Homan and AOC started when the New York Democrat’s office held a “Know Your Rights” webinar advising illegal aliens on how to respond if they encounter ICE agents intending to deport them.

It instructed undocumented immigrants on how to identify different types of warrants and advised them to request relevant warrants. Back then, Homan suggested that AOC had crossed the line and was likely impeding ICE by instructing illegal aliens on how to evade detention.

“At what level is that impediment?” Homan asked. “I’m not an attorney, I’m not prosecuting. Is that impeding our law enforcement efforts?”

“If so, what are we going to do about it? Is she crossing the line? I’m working with the Department of Justice and finding out where is that line that they cross.”

In February, he told Fox News’ Ingraham that he had written to the Deputy Attorney General requesting additional guidance to investigate AOC. However, the far left Democrat contemptuously dared Homan to arrest her.

“Tom Homan said he was going to refer me to the DOJ because I’m using my free speech rights in order to advise people of their constitutional protections. To that I say: Come for me, do I look like I care?” Ocasio-Cortez said.

She also asserted that there was “nothing illegal about it and if they want to make it illegal, they can come take me,” suggesting that Homan was making his own laws.

However, after the recent federal judge’s ruling, individuals with deportation orders will be expected to cooperate with ICE agents rather than create additional barriers, effectively placing the responsibility for compliance on them. Subsequently, following AOC’s advice could make them willfully non-compliant.

“Game’s over. We’re going to look for these public safety threats, and we’re going to take them off those streets in New York and every other sanctuary city,” he said.

Illegal Immigration

BOMBSHELL Confession Links “Maryland Dad” Kilmer Abrego-Garcia to Human Trafficking

/

Democrats’ poster child for anti-Trump deportations, Kilmer Abrego-Garcia, continues to suffer reputational damage as his checkered past continues to surface. 

His alleged human trafficking boss has spoken after the Tennessee Highway Patrol (THP) released the bodycam footage of his traffic stop while hauling alleged human trafficking subjects.

“He’s hauling these people for money,” the trooper said.

During the stop, the El Salvadorian was driving a 2001 Chevrolet Silverado belonging to a convicted human trafficker, Ramon Hernandez Reyes. The alleged MS-13 gang member also had $1,400 in cash, which one THP officer suggested was his payment for transporting the suspected illegal aliens across the country. All nine passengers in the vehicle had no luggage and gave Abrego-Garcia’s address, which is typical of individuals being smuggled into the country.

THP officers contacted Biden’s FBI and were instructed to release him without charges. He also did not receive a speeding ticket but was given a warning for driving with an expired license.

“Per standard protocol, the THP contacted federal law enforcement authorities with the Biden-era FBI — the agency of jurisdiction — who made the decision not to detain him.”

Reyes has now confirmed that he had indeed hired Abrego-Garcia to transport illegal immigrants from Texas to other parts of the country, as the officer had suspected. When asked about the car owner, Abrego-Garcia said it belonged to his boss, further corroborating Reyes’ claim.

The convicted smuggler also disclosed that he met Abrego-Garcia in 2015 and they started working together for many years before he was arrested in 2019 and convicted in 2020.

“Hernandez Reyes reportedly told the DOJ officials that he met Abrego Garcia in 2015, just three years after the latter man reportedly admitted to illegally entering the United States,” the Tennessee Star reported.

Reyes also disclosed that he charged $350 per head and paid Abrego-Garcia part of the money to drive illegal immigrants across the country. 

Meanwhile, Reyes was sentenced to 18 months in prison, deported, and ordered not to return to the United States for three years. However, he illegally re-entered the country and was re-arrested. He confessed to illegal reentry and was sentenced to 30 months in prison in 2022, which he is currently serving at the Federal Correctional Institution (FCI) in Talladega, Alabama. 

Reyes confessed to the Department of Justice attorneys and will receive “limited immunity.” During his trial, Reyes had also confessed to conspiring to smuggle illegal immigrants and being in the country illegally. Thus, his recent confession may not significantly affect his current sentence.

Similarly, Abrego-Garcia admitted to being in the country illegally during his 2019 trial, in which he was the judge entered a “withholding of removal” order preventing him from being deported to his home country of El Salvador or Guatemala.

Nonetheless, Democrats will continue to lie that American citizens could be deported to foreign countries, often citing Abrego-Garcia as an example. They will also continue to ignore all the mounting evidence that the alleged MS-13 gangbanger was not the model citizen they present him to be.

National Affairs

Study Warns California’s Green Energy Scam Will Cost Households Tens of Thousands

/

A study by the nonpartisan Pacific Research Institute (PRI) has found that California’s green energy scam will cost households a staggering amount to fund the transition to unreliable alternative sources. PRI released its findings in a paper titled “The Cost of Going Green” as America commemorated Earth Day.

In 2018, then-Gov. Jerry Brown signed Senate Bill 100, which required that all electricity produced by 2045 be from renewable sources. Incumbent Gov. Gavin Newsom has aggressively pushed the green scam and imposed additional requirements, making the cost of transition prohibitive.

“According to PRI’s analysis, California households will bear significant costs, estimated to be between $17,398 and $20,182 per household, to fund the state’s transition to alternative energy sources between 2025 and 2050.”

The state intends to spend approximately $246.7 billion to construct green energy infrastructure such as solar panels, wind turbines, electric vehicles, and charging stations to enable the transition to green energy. It will also use taxpayers’ money to decommission natural gas and nuclear power stations, which are cleaner and more reliable.

“California’s government mandates are forcing an energy transition that will impose enormous costs on the state’s residents,” said Dr. Wayne Winegarden, PRI senior fellow in business and economics and co-author of the study. “These policies will lead to higher energy costs, a less reliable energy system, and reduced economic opportunities. It is crucial for policymakers and the public to understand the true costs of these mandates.”

California is also pushing other unpopular green energy policies, such as mandatory transition from gas-powered to zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) by 2035. 

Besides the direct costs, the transition to green energy will result in energy shortfalls of about 21.2% by 2045, potentially affecting productivity and the economy. Germany’s economy has slowed down due to various factors, among them an increase in energy prices due to an aggressive pursuit of green energy. 

Currently, the cost of energy in California is significantly higher than the national average due to various factors, such as aggressive taxation and regulations to cut greenhouse gas emissions. Despite using 34% less electricity than the national average, Californians pay 56% more for energy than Americans in other states. However, Gov. Gavin Newsom deflects and shifts the blame to oil corporations, which he says increase oil prices to line their shareholders’ pockets. 

“You have been fleeced by the oil companies,” Gov. Newsom said. “You have been screwed for decades and decades by the oil companies. They took advantage of market conditions. That’s why we called the special session.”

Meanwhile, the PRI study also debunked the myth that green energy was cheaper and cleaner than fossil fuels. It warned that solar panels are made of toxic materials and are difficult to recycle, posing environmental challenges when discarded. Similarly, the mining of resources for their manufacture and the manufacturing process itself also negatively impact the environment.

“California’s pursuit of a green energy future comes with a hefty price tag and its own environmental challenges,” added Kerry Jackson, study co-author and PRI’s William Clement Fellow in California Reform. “It is essential that policymakers enact energy policies that are economically viable and do not place an undue burden on California’s households and businesses.”

Meanwhile, California legislators are pushing AB 942 to slash solar credits for nearly 2 million homeowners and impose a solar tax.

Besides California, other Democrat-run states, such as New Jersey, also experience higher-than-national-average prices due to misguided green energy initiatives.

Supreme Court

America First Legal Sues Chief Justice Roberts Over Lawfare- “You Can’t Have Your Cake And Eat It Too”

/

Stephen Miller’s conservative legal advocacy group America First Legal Foundation (AFLF) has filed a lawsuit against Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., and Robert J. Conrad, in their official capacities as the Presiding Officer of the Judicial Conference; and Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, respectively, for allegedly violating federal transparency laws.

The lawsuit also accuses the duo of cozying up with far-left lawmakers to wage lawfare against conservative Supreme Court justices to undermine the independence of the Supreme Court.

The lawsuit stems from a Freedom of Information (FOIA) request the AFLF made regarding communications between the far-left lawmakers Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and Rep. Hank Johnson and the Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office. However, the policymaking bodies outrightly rejected the requests by claiming they were exempt from such FOIA demands.

Ironically, the Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office have honored several “congressional oversight requests” by the far-Left lawmakers to aid them in going after Justices Thomas and Alito.

“When it comes to government transparency, you can’t have your cake and eat it too,” remarked Dan Epstein, America First Legal Vice President. 

According to the lawsuit, Sen. Whitehouse and Rep. Johnson have for several years waged lawfare against Supreme Court Justices Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh, and in the process, enjoyed favorable legacy media coverage. Similarly, the Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office have acted as the “central levers” for the lawmakers’ persistent lawfare campaign. 

“This lawfare has been led by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and Representative Hank Johnson, relying upon an ideologically favorable legacy media to falsely accuse Justices Thomas and Alito of ethical improprieties. Their aim was simple: to chill the judicial independence of these Supreme Court Justices.”

The lawsuit explains that Whitehouse and Johnson have accused Justice Thomas of “acting willfully to violate the Ethics in Government Act and directed the U.S. Department of Justice to criminally investigate the matter.” Similarly, Sen. Johnson filed an ethics complaint against Justice Alito, accusing him of violating “several canons of judicial ethics.” The justices have been accused by far-left lawmakers of not being forthcoming about their financial relationships.

Meanwhile, AFLF argues that the Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office must comply with FOIA requests because they are not part of the judiciary but the executive branch and exercise executive powers, including issuing binding regulations.

“Thus, the Judicial Conference and Administrative Office exercise executive functions and are accordingly subject to FOIA. Accordingly, their refusal to comply with AFL’s FOIA request is unlawful.”

It also argues that the two bodies should be declared “independent agencies within the executive branch” and the President should have the authority to appoint and remove the Judicial Conference’s Presiding Officer and the Director of the Administrative Office.

“Under our constitutional tradition, accommodations with Congress are the province of the executive branch. The Judicial Conference and the Administrative Office are therefore executive agencies. Such agencies must be overseen by the President, not the courts. Judicial relief here not only preserves the separation of powers but also keeps the courts out of politics.”

Uncategorized

Trump Disappoints the Left, Rejects Third Term Bid, Promises Four Great Years of Something Spectacular

/

Trump once again shut down another media narrative by dismissing rumors about a potential third presidential bid during NBC’s Meet the Press interview with Kristen Welker. 

“The Trump organization is selling hats that say Trump 2028,” she said. “Are you seriously considering a third term, Mr. President, even though it’s prohibited by the Constitution or is this about staying politically viable?”

“I will say this: so many people want me to do it. I have never had requests so strong as that, but it’s something that, to the best of my knowledge, you’re not allowed to do,” he replied.

Tennessee Republican Congressman Andy Ogles and former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon had suggested that Trump should or would seek re-election for the third time.

“I think he is going to run again in 2028 and I think he is going to win,” Bannon said. “I think we’ll have a couple of alternatives.”

And Trump himself has trolled the left about the possibility.

However, Trump dismissed that possibility by suggesting that a third re-election bid would violate the Constitution.

“I don’t know if that’s constitutional, that they’re not allowing you to do or anything else, but there are many people willing to wear the 2028 hats, but this is not something I’m looking to do.”

He also insisted that he intends to achieve his objectives during his second term and ensure that a Republican succeeds him by winning the next elections. 

“I’m looking to have four great years and turn it over to somebody, ideally, a great Republican, a great Republican to carry it forward, but I think we’ll have four years, And I think four years is plenty of time to do something really spectacular.”

Nonetheless, Welker continued to prod the president, seemingly hoping for a gotcha moment that the far-left network would play on auto-repeat to convince Americans that Trump was a threat to democracy.

“The Constitution does prohibit it,” she said. “Some of your allies are pretty serious about this, though, Mr. President. I’ve spoken to them. They say they are coming up with potential ways obviously the biggest one would be a constitutional amendment.”

“That’s because they like the job I’m doing, and that’s a compliment,” Trump replied.

She also tried to ambush the president by asking him to name a successor, less than half a year into power. She likely hoped the president would name someone other than his Vice President, JD Vance, or fail to recognize others to sow discord within the party.

“Who do you see as your successor?” Welker asked.

“It’s far too early to say that, but I do have a vice president and typically and, JD is doing a fantastic job. I don’t want to get involved in that, I think he’s a fantastic, brilliant guy. Marco is great. There are a lot of them that are great.”

During the last Meet the Press interview, Trump indicated he was “focused on the current” and was not interested in a third term.

“I’m not looking at that, but I tell you, I have had more people ask me to have a third term, which in a way is a fourth term, because the other election, the 2020 election, was totally rigged,” he said.

Nonetheless, far-left journalists continued to press the White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, asking if Trump indeed seeks to run for the third time. “You guys continue to ask the president this question about a third term, and then he answers honestly and candidly with a smile, and then everybody here melts down about his answer,” she said.

Despite Trump’s clear answer that he does not intend to violate the Constitution, the left continues to convince Americans that there is a real possibility he would run. They even ran a poll to make it seem like he was out of step with American voters, a classic red herring tactic to divert Americans from the left’s unpopularity.

Democrats

Unhinged Democrat Jasmine Crockett Erupts After Trump Calls Her “Low IQ Person” During Meet the Press Interview

/

Far-Left Texas Democrat Jasmine Crockett erupted in the most predictable fashion in response to President Trump’s jab during his NBC’s Meet the Press interview at his Mar-a-Lago residence. 

The president was discussing various issues with one of his least favorite hosts, Kristen Welker, whom he has repeatedly called out over seemingly biased questioning. 

During the interview, he doubled down on his “low IQ person” remarks to describe Rep. Crockett and predicted a gloomy future for the blue party that he said continues to front her as one of its preferred leaders. 

“I look at the Democrats, they’re in total disarray,” he said. “They have a new person named Crockett. I watched her speak the other day, and she’s definitely a low I.Q. person.”

“And they say she’s the future of the party.”

Typically, it is not the insult itself that stings the most, but the element of truth it contains. Unsurprisingly, Crockett responded in the most predictable “race-baiting” fashion, seemingly proving that she lacks the intellectual sophistication to challenge Trump on a higher ground.

“For you to be in charge of the WHOLE country, you sure do have my name in your mouth a lot,” she lashed out. “Every time you say my name, you’re reminding the world that you’re terrified of smart, bold Black women telling the truth and holding you accountable.”

“So keep talking…”

Trump first set his sights on Rep. Crockett during the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) when he said that Democrats have taken a lot of beating and gone crazy.

“They have a new one, Crockett. How about her? Is that real? Are they serious about that? That’s their new star? If that’s their new star, they’re in serious trouble,” he said.

It recently emerged that Crockett is seeking to replace retiring Congressman Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA) as the House Oversight Committee chair, putting her on a collision course with the far-Left Squad member Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY). 

Meanwhile, Democrats have seemingly allowed Crockett to get away with some of the most offensive things for fear of criticizing her due to her race. 

They remained eerily quiet when he degraded people with disabilities by calling one of Trump’s stalwart allies, Texas Governor Greg Abbott, “Governor Hot Wheels.” 

“We in these hot ass Texas streets, honey. Y’all know we got Governor Hot Wheels down there, Come on now! And the only thing hot about him is that he is a hot ass mess, honey! So, so yes! Yes, yes, yes,” she said.

Not even one Democrat openly said that her remarks were not in good taste, and assured people with disabilities that the party will always stand with them.

She also called for “Elon [Musk] to be taken down” on her birthday, prompting a stern warning from the U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi for her to tread carefully as an elected official.

Rep. Crockett also said she was “tired of the white tears” from “mediocre white boys” complaining about minorities receiving preferential treatment.

“I am tired of the white tears. Listen, if you are competent, you are not concerned.”

Other race-baiting remarks by the Texas Democrat include unfounded accusations of Trump trying bring back slavery and send Black people to the fields by deporting illegal aliens.

crime

He’s Hauling These People For Money: TN Highway Patrol Releases Abrego-Garcia’s “Human Trafficking” Bodycam Footage

/

The Tennessee Highway Patrol (THP) has released the traffic stop footage of Kilmer Abrego-Garcia when he was stopped for allegedly swerving and speeding while driving with a suspended license and no insurance in the company of illegal aliens and suspected MS-13 gang members. 

The footage obtained by Fox News details some of the allegations made against Abrego-Garcia before he became a darling of the Democrats and his brush with authorities became a political issue.

When stopped, one of the officers noted that his vehicle, which seemed to have a modified additional seat, packed eight individuals and had potentially unusually dark windows. 

“How many rows have you got in here? Four seats? Four rows of seats?” the trooper asked. “Did y’all put an extra one in?”

“I’ve never seen one with that many seats in it,” he added.

The passengers also did not have luggage and gave the same address as Abrego-Garcia, suggesting they had no known residence, which is typical of human trafficking subjects.

Abrego-Garcia’s story of where he was headed also kept changing, initially stating that he was driving from St. Louis to his Maryland residence, but later claiming he was heading somewhere else for some construction work.

A trooper also noted that Abrego-Garcia had $1,400 in cash, which was likely his payment for smuggling the suspected illegal aliens and MS-13 gang members.

“He’s hauling these people for money,” the trooper said.

Abrego-Garcia also said the car belonged to his boss. It was later determined that it belonged to a known and convicted human trafficker, Jose Ramon Hernandez Reyes.

THP officers took Abrego-Garcia into custody and contacted the FBI, but were instructed to release him without any further action, even as much as investigating him.

Previously, Abrego-Garcia was arrested by Prince George’s County Police Department officers on March 28, 2019, for loitering in the company of two suspected MS-13 gang members while wearing clothes the police said were “indicative of Hispanic gang culture”. The group was also found in possession of Marijuana and discarded some undisclosed items under the vehicle. 

One of the men was Christhyan Hernandez-Romero, who has a long rap sheet and is linked to the MS-13’s “Sailors Clique.” The other was Jose Guillermo Dominguez, who had tattoos indicative of a higher MS-13 rank.

Similarly, a confidential and reliable informant also identified Abrego-Garcia as an active MS-13 gang member of the rank “Chequeo” or “Chele” with the “Westerns clique.” 

Abrego-Garcia’s wife’s ex-husband, Edwin Trejo Ramos, also said in a 2018 emergency custody petition filed at Prince George’s County Circuit Court in Maryland that he feared for the safety of his children since his ex-wife was dating a gang member.

“She is dating a gang member,” Ramos stated, according to the New York Post, which also reported that the petition was ultimately dropped due to jurisdiction issues. 

Abrego-Garcia’s wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, also filed a restraining order in 2021 alleging domestic violence. The order was granted after the judge found that he had punched, scratched, grabbed, bruised, and ripped off her shirt. 

Subsequently, Abrego-Garcia was prohibited from contacting or attempting to contact her mother or entering her residence.  He was also banned from contacting his wife’s mother or entering her residence.

Meanwhile, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Steven Miller recently slammed Democrats for supporting  “wife-beating terrorist illegal aliens.”

“We’ve reached a point in American politics where we have one party led by President Donald Trump that fights for Americans, and a second party, I guess led by AOC, that fights for illegal aliens, but not just illegal aliens. Criminal, wife-beating terrorist illegal aliens,” Miller said.

Media

‘I’m Black—You’re Not’: Sparks Fly on CNN as Singleton Blasts Navarro’s Slavery-Illegal Immigration Link

/

CNN was forced into a commercial break after a shouting match ensued when one of the unhinged commentators was triggered and resorted to racial outbursts when facts were not in her favor.

Scott Jennings lit the match when he called out the Biden administration for letting everybody walk across the border without due process, to which Republican strategist Shermichael Singleton insisted they must leave.

“We are a sovereign nation,” Singleton said. “You cannot just come into our country illegally whenever the heck you want… we can’t do it to any other country on the face of this Earth.”

However, fellow unhinged commentator Ana Navarro tried to draw false parallels between slaves and other illegal immigrants who voluntarily crossed the border without authorization.

“We have a hell of a lot of people, other than the Black people who were brought here as slaves, who came to this country illegally,” Navarro said.

However, Singleton pointed out that the slaves “were brought here against our will” unlike illegal immigrants who “decided to walk their butt across the border.”

“There’s a big difference. There is a big difference,” he insisted.

“That’s exactly what I just said,” Navarro said, her voice getting sharper and louder. “That’s exactly what I just said. Sure, Shermichael. Sure, Shermichael. Looking—act indignant. That’s exactly what I just said.”

Meanwhile, Navarro and host Abby Philips continued to insist that Singleton had misheard the statement, with The View’s regular asserting that she has always advocated for Black people to say anything derogatory.

“Because you have advocated for Black people—great. Congratulations. Last time I checked, I’m Black. You’re not,” Singleton said.

“That’s right. I’m Latino, and my people are being racially profiled,” Navarro blurted.

Either way, illegal immigration is not remotely connected to slavery, and Navarro’s attempt to create the false analogy falls flat on its stomach. Similarly, all races, including Asians and black Africans, are being deported, thus making Navarro’s claim that her race was being profiled preposterous.

Nonetheless, liberals often inject racism and slavery into almost every conversation involving a Black person, in a likely attempt to gaslight them into agreeing. Former President Joe Biden even suggested that Black people were not indeed Black unless they were willing to vote for him.

“If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t Black,” he said.

Having a Black person who is willing to call out the false racial narrative is always priceless and a huge threat to liberals. Subsequently, Black conservatives are usually the most hated by the left and are usually subject to various forms of racism by white liberals.

Meanwhile, Scott Jennings, who is rumored to be seeking another office instead of schooling liberals on CNN, watched the showdown from afar.

Word on the street is that he is considering running to replace the retiring Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) and is waiting for Trump’s green light to proceed. Without a suitable replacement for Jennings, CNN risks losing whatever little credibility it had left.

Uncategorized

Complicit? California Democrats Send Another Child Sex Trafficking Bill Into Oblivion – LGBTQ Concerns Raised

/

The Democrat-dominated California legislature is reluctant to pass a bill to protect children under 18 years from sex trafficking. Introduced by Sacramento Democrat Assemblywoman Maggy Krell, Assembly Bill 379 (AB 379) aims to protect children under 18 years from sex solicitation and child trafficking.

“I want to solve two problems with this bill: One, we have to create more resources for victims like Julie and the thousands of other victims who are being trafficked,” the Assemblywoman explained. “And two: we have to crack down on the men who are buying them for sex. That’s what Assembly Bill 379 does. 

“It creates a law that allows law enforcement to intervene, when men are out on the prowl trying to buy victims for sex. It also makes it chargeable as a felony when those victims are under 18 years old.”

In 2024, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 1414 into law, making it a felony to solicit sex from children under the age of 16. However, soliciting or purchasing sex from 16- and 17-year-old children was a wobbler, allowing prosecutors to charge it as a misdemeanor or felony.

Introduced by Bakersfield Republican state Senator Shannon Grove and Assemblywoman Krell, SB 1414 aimed to make it a felony to solicit sex from all children under the age of 18. According to Krell, banning solicitation across the board would help to protect children from sex trafficking, which hinges on the ability to purchase sex from minors without serious consequences.

Nonetheless, California Democrats neutered the bill, capping the age at 15 years and below for felony charges to apply. Additionally, they attempted to kill it by sending it to the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Although he did not make any effort to impose stricter penalties for all solicitations below 18 years, California Governor Gavin Newsom intervened and helped push the bipartisan bill forward until it became law.

Given the obvious shortcomings of SB 1414, Assemblywoman Krell introduced Assembly Bill 379 (AB 379) to make it a crime to solicit or purchase sex from children under 18. 

However, AB 379 faces the same fate as SB 1414 after Democrats sent it to the Assembly Public Safety Committee to gather dust. Additionally, in due consideration of the looming deadline, the bill was dropped from the Committee’s agenda, further delaying it indefinitely. 

Some committee members, such as Assembly Majority Whip Mark González have raised concerns that the bill would disproportionately affect the LGBTQ community and people of color. Once again, Democrats will likely prioritize perceived implications on the LGBTQ community and ignore the plight of child sex trafficking victims.

Meanwhile, Assemblywoman Krell’s work in fighting child sex trafficking is undeniable, regardless of her political affiliations. She has prosecuted child sex predators, demanded tougher sentences, and consistently raised alarm over child sex trafficking in California, which her fellow party members are seemingly uninterested in stopping.

“We’re still seeing throughout California girls being sold for commercial sex, seeing a lot of teenagers. Creeps in cars lining up to buy teenagers. We need to do more to address demand,” she said in support of the bill.

This time, it remains to be seen if Gov. Newsom will use his influence to revive the bill out of genuine concern or simply for political grandstanding.


Subscribe Form

© 2025 WokeSpy All Rights Reserved

Scroll to Top