Author name: Keith Burns

Democrats

Fetterman Calls Out Everyone in the Democratic Party Over Their Maduro Hypocrisy

Sen. John Fetterman commented on what he described as a noticeable shift in political dynamics and public perception surrounding Venezuela, pointing to recent developments that he said mark a new phase in how the United States is approaching the country and its leadership.

Fetterman referenced how attention has moved away from earlier flashpoint moments and toward broader consequences now unfolding.

“Yeah, well, I mean, everybody wanted to see about that video, about that boat, and now, now we’re not talking about that anymore,” Fetterman said.

“It’s like, well, here that’s that happened.”

He reflected on how Venezuela’s leadership had been widely characterized across party lines in the past, including by Democrats.

“So, you know, for me, I think Democrats, we all used to describe him as a dictator or a tyrant or a terrible person,” Fetterman said, noting that this sentiment was not distant history.

“And it wasn’t less than a year ago. President Biden raised, raised the bounty for $25 million less than a year ago.”

Fetterman suggested that circumstances have since changed, creating what he views as a different political moment.

“And now here, here, we’re in a better way to now,” he said.

He added that despite partisan differences, he is open to developments that could benefit Venezuelans.

“And that’s why I think, as a Democrat, you know, just because it’s a different party here, it’s like, I’m open to better opportunities for Venezuelan.”

He pointed to reactions from Venezuelans living in the United States as evidence of that shift.

“And now I turn to a lot of the Venezuelans in our nation, and they’re all celebrating these things,” Fetterman said.

He also acknowledged the widespread rejection of Venezuela’s previous system of governance.

“And we all recognize that kind of warm collectivism, socialism in Venezuela. No one really liked to live under that, and they had to flee that.”

Fetterman said recent legal developments signal a path forward.

“And now here we have a way forward,” he said.

He specifically referenced the initiation of legal proceedings.

“And now there’s a trial, a public trial, and now here, so that’s the way it works.”

WATCH:

News

DeSantis Says Florida Arrested Over 10,400 Illegal Aliens in Statewide Crackdown

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis announced Monday that Florida law enforcement has arrested more than 10,400 illegal aliens since launching a statewide immigration enforcement initiative last year in coordination with federal authorities, as reported by Fox News.

Speaking during a news conference, DeSantis said the arrests stem from “Operation Tidal Wave,” a joint effort between Florida and Immigration and Customs Enforcement that began in April 2025. The operation is described by state officials as the largest cooperative immigration enforcement action in ICE’s history.

“In April 2025, Florida partnered with federal law enforcement in the largest joint immigration enforcement operation in ICE’s history: Operation Tidal Wave,” DeSantis wrote in a post on X.

“Today, I was proud to announce a new milestone in our joint efforts to combat illegal immigration and restore order in our communities: Florida law enforcement have arrested more than 10,400 illegal immigrants across the state.”

State officials said the initiative involves coordinated enforcement actions across Florida aimed at identifying and arresting illegal aliens already in custody or encountered during routine law enforcement operations.

DeSantis has made immigration enforcement a central priority of his administration, repeatedly emphasizing cooperation with federal authorities under President Donald Trump.

In September, DeSantis appeared in Tallahassee alongside ICE Deputy Director Madison D. Sheahan and other officials to announce a major infusion of federal funding to expand Florida’s enforcement capacity.

According to Sheahan, Florida is receiving $28 million in federal funds, with an additional $10 million allocated directly to local law enforcement agencies.

The funding is part of a broader $1.7 billion national distribution authorized under President Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill.”

ICE said the funds are designated to support both transportation and equipment needs for participating agencies.

Of the total, $2.7 million is earmarked for transportation support for local law enforcement agencies, while $7.3 million will be used to purchase equipment for 974 local officers.

At the state level, $1 million is allocated for transportation costs, and $27.5 million is designated for equipment benefiting 3,676 state law enforcement officers.

The funding supports Florida’s extensive participation in the federal 287(g) program, which allows trained state and local officers to carry out certain immigration enforcement functions.

ICE officials said Florida currently has 325 active 287(g) agreements, more than any other state, and described Florida as having “set the standard” nationwide for participation in the program.

DeSantis has also issued warnings against interference with immigration enforcement operations in the state. During remarks in September, he made clear that threats or attacks against ICE agents would be met with swift consequences.

“Florida is not Portland,” DeSantis said.

“If you think you can go and launch attacks against ICE agents in this state, you’ve got another thing coming. We will hold you accountable very swiftly and very severely.”

State officials said Operation Tidal Wave remains ongoing, with additional enforcement actions expected as federal and state partnerships continue.

News

Texas Police Close State’s Oldest Missing Person Case After 52 Years

Texas law enforcement officials have solved what is believed to be the state’s oldest missing persons case, finally providing answers more than five decades after a Dallas teenager vanished without a trace, as reported by The New York Post.

The Dallas Police Department announced Friday that investigators have positively identified a long-unidentified teenage victim of a 1973 hit-and-run as Norman Prater, who disappeared from Dallas at age 16.

Norman Prater was reported missing on Jan. 16, 1973, after spending a late night with friends in Dallas. He never returned home, and despite years of investigative work, police were unable to generate credible leads.

The case remained unresolved for more than 50 years.

That changed when authorities confirmed that an unidentified teenager killed in a hit-and-run crash on July 9, 1973, along Highway 35 in Rockport, Texas, was in fact Prater.

Rockport is located approximately 380 miles south of Dallas in Aransas County. At the time of the crash, officials were unable to identify the victim, and the case faded into obscurity.

The breakthrough came after Ryan Dalby, a detective assigned to the department’s Missing Persons Unit, was contacted by a medical examiner in Aransas County who had been reviewing decades-old case files.

The examiner flagged similarities between the unidentified crash victim and Prater’s disappearance.

“I pull up the file, and I look at it, I’m like, ‘Are you kidding me?!’” Dalby told NBC Dallas–Fort Worth.

The medical examiner retrieved the original case file, and with assistance from a forensic analyst, investigators examined facial characteristics using recognition software.

Dalby said the analysis revealed “points of reference on the face” that suggested “a high probability of the person that was found down there being Norman Prater.”

“I’m like, I’m looking at the photos by the side by side. I’m like, ‘Yeah, I’m with them. There’s a high probability this could be who we’re looking for,’” Dalby said.

Still, Dalby said he was not willing to risk misidentification after more than five decades. He contacted Norman’s older brother, Isaac Prater, to confirm the findings.

“He answers the phone and is like, ‘Who is this?’ I’m like, ‘It’s Detective Dalby with the Dallas Police Department.’ He goes, ‘I’ve waited 52 years for this phone call. Please tell me you have something’,” Dalby told the outlet.

Isaac Prater traveled to Dallas police headquarters the following day. Dalby showed him the facial recognition images used in the identification process.

“I showed him recognition software that they used, and he just looks at me and he goes, ‘You can close the case, that’s my brother, case is done,’” Dalby said.

“He finally has closure. He has closure after 52 years of wondering where his brother is.”

Dalby told Fox 4 that Isaac Prater was able to identify specific facial scars, including one on Norman’s lip caused by a dog attack and another on his eyebrow from a fight.

Investigators said it remains unclear what Norman was doing during the six months between his disappearance and his death or how he traveled so far from Dallas.

Dalby told Fox 4 that hitchhiking, which was common in the 1970s, may explain how Norman ended up in South Texas.

News

Florida Man Busted in a Lace Bra and a G-String, Legendary Sheriff Grady Judd Breaks It Down

Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd described what he called a highly unusual and potentially dangerous trespassing arrest involving a man discovered on a construction site while armed and wearing unconventional attire.

According to Judd, the suspect was identified as Matthew Zacharino, a 39-year-old from Altamont Springs, who was found alone inside a vehicle on an active construction site when deputies approached to investigate.

“Now, occasionally I bring you stuff that you just can’t believe that you’ll never get over, that may even scar you for life. But I got to introduce you to this guy,” Judd said.

“He’s not from Polk County. Of course, I don’t think we got anybody from Polk County quite like this guy.”

Judd said deputies immediately noticed something out of the ordinary as they made contact with Zacharino.

“This is Matthew Zacharino. He’s 39 he’s from Altamont springs, and he’s on this construction site in a vehicle by himself, and as our deputies approach him to see what’s he doing on this construction site, we see this dude wearing a red lace bra with prosthetic silicone breasteses. Know what I mean?” Judd said.

The sheriff continued by detailing additional observations made by deputies at the scene.

“Well, then we notice he’s wearing a G-string, showing off the boys, you know what I mean,” Judd said.

“And then our two deputies say to themselves, self, this is highly unusual, but you don’t realize how dangerous these situations are, because under a prosthesis, we found a gun.”

Judd said the discovery of the concealed firearm escalated the situation significantly, turning what initially appeared to be a bizarre trespassing incident into a serious public safety concern.

“So he was armed trespassing,” Judd said.

According to Judd, Zacharino attempted to explain his presence and appearance by claiming he was headed to a costume party.

Deputies attempted to verify that explanation.

“He said he was on the way to the costume party,” Judd said.

“We go, Okay, where’s costume party? Well, he couldn’t answer that, and then he sold up on us and quit wanting to talk at all.”

Judd said the suspect became uncooperative when deputies continued asking questions about the situation.

“Can you imagine that he’s mad at us for trying to find out why he’s wearing lace bras with guns and G strings or G somethings or, ooh, it was ugly. It was so ugly,” Judd said.

The encounter ended with Zacharino being taken into custody and transported to jail.

“Anyway, he went to jail,” Judd said.

“Have a good day.”

WATCH:

News

Venezuelan Journalist Blasts Anti-Trump Protestors Backing Venezuelan Dictator Maduro

Venezuelan journalist Germania Rodriguez Poleo delivered a message aimed at English-speaking audiences as she said she was already seeing people organize protests in support of Nicolas Maduro.

In her remarks, she urged people not to let their feelings about President Donald Trump lead them to defend Maduro.

“Now a message to my english speaking friends, because I’m already seeing people are organizing protests. Hands off Venezuela. Let’s defend Maduro. We love dictators,” Rodriguez Poleo said.

Rodriguez Poleo framed her message as a warning to those she said were preparing demonstrations, and she argued that opposition to President Trump should not translate into backing Venezuela’s dictator.

“Do not for a moment, let your hatred and disdain for Donald Trump, an unsavory character, have you defending the dictator of my country that was destroyed by him and Chavez and their system 20 years ago?” she said.

Rodriguez Poleo said Venezuelans were happy about Maduro’s arrest and said she viewed it as a turning point after decades without justice.

“We Venezuelans are very, very happy that our dictator has been arrested, removed, and will be put through a trial,” Rodriguez Poleo said.

She described the moment as the first time she believes justice is being pursued after a long period.

“It’s the first time we’re seeing justice in 26 years,” she said.

Rodriguez Poleo also expressed hope that additional figures she described as criminals would be removed from Venezuela, and she tied that outcome to Venezuelans being able to return home.

“Now let’s hope that they get the rest of the criminals out of Venezuela and then we can return home,” she said.

In her statement, Rodriguez Poleo linked Venezuela’s destruction to Maduro, Hugo Chavez, and what she described as their system, and she urged her audience to reject calls to defend Maduro even if they strongly oppose President Trump.

Her comments centered on two themes: the protests she said were being organized by English speakers and her support for Maduro being arrested, removed, and put through a trial.

Rodriguez Poleo said she hoped the removal of Maduro and other criminals would lead to Venezuelans being able to return home after what she described as years of destruction tied to Maduro, Chavez, and their system.

WATCH:

News

Chuck Schumer’s Own Words Come Back to Haunt Him as He Melts Down Over Maduro Capture

Democratic New York Sen. Chuck Schumer said Sunday that he will introduce a War Powers Act resolution aimed at blocking further U.S. military operations involving Venezuela, following an operation announced by President Donald Trump that resulted in the arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores.

Schumer made the remarks during an appearance on ABC’s “This Week” with host George Stephanopoulos.

His comments came one day after President Trump announced in a Saturday post on Truth Social that Maduro and Flores were arrested in Caracas during a law enforcement operation protected by American military forces.

Schumer sharply criticized the operation and accused the Trump administration of acting outside the law.

He characterized the mission as an example of what he described as executive overreach and said Congress must intervene.

“The American people this morning, George, are scratching their heads in wonderment and in fear of what the president’s proposed,” Schumer said.

“The United States will run Venezuela. We have learned though the years, when America tries to regime change and nation-building in this way, the American people pay the price, in both blood and in dollars.”

Schumer also claimed the Trump administration lacked the authority to conduct the operation.

During a Saturday press conference following the capture of Maduro, President Trump said the United States was “running” Venezuela and stated that senior administration officials would oversee the situation.

Trump said Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine would be in charge.

Schumer disputed the scope and legality of the operation, alleging it went beyond defensive actions.

“They did not just do ships off the water,” Schumer said.

“They went inside Venezuela, bombed civilian as well as military places, and it’s a violation of the law to do what they did without getting the authorization of Congress.”

In the aftermath of the operation, several left-wing commentators and Democratic figures publicly condemned the action.

Podcasters Keith Olbermann and Dean Obeidallah called for President Trump’s impeachment in posts on BlueSky.

Congressional Democrats also criticized the mission, describing it as an illegal war.

Schumer accused Trump administration officials of misleading both Congress and the American public about the nature and scope of the operation.

During the interview, Stephanopoulos asked Schumer what steps Congress could take in response.

“What can the Congress do about it is the next question,” Stephanopoulos said.

Schumer responded by pointing to the War Powers Act as a legislative mechanism to limit the president’s authority.

“The next question is very simple, and that is that we have the War Powers Act,” Schumer said.

“That’s a privileged resolution, which means the Republicans can’t block it. Tim Kaine and I and Rand Paul are sponsors of it. It’s gonna come to the floor this week, and if it is voted for positively in both houses, then the President can’t do another thing in Venezuela without the okay of the Congress.”

Schumer’s position marked a notable contrast with his statements about Venezuela during President Trump’s first term.

In 2020, Schumer criticized Trump for what he said was a failure to remove Maduro from power after the Venezuelan leader was indicted in March of that year on drug trafficking charges.

“The President brags about his Venezuela policy? Give us a break. He hasn’t brought an end to the Maduro regime,” Schumer said at the time.

The War Powers Act resolution proposed by Schumer is expected to be introduced in the coming days, with debate anticipated in both chambers of Congress.

The move sets up a confrontation between congressional Democrats and the Trump administration over the scope of presidential authority in foreign military operations, as well as the future of U.S. involvement in Venezuela following the arrest of Maduro and Flores.

News

Elon Musk Signals His Bromance with Donald Trump is Back On After ‘Lovely Dinner’

President Donald Trump and billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk appear to have eased tensions and repaired their previously strained relationship, following a weekend dinner at Mar-a-Lago that was publicly acknowledged by Musk on social media.

In a post shared Sunday on X, Musk wrote, “Had a lovely dinner last night with @POTUS and @FLOTUS,” adding, “2026 is going to be amazing!”

The post included a photograph taken Saturday evening at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, and immediately sparked speculation that the high-profile relationship between the two figures may be back on stable footing after months of public disagreements.

The interaction marked a notable shift from the friction that developed following the 2024 presidential election.

After that campaign, Musk emerged as one of the Republican Party’s largest political donors, contributing hundreds of millions of dollars, according to Reuters.

His financial backing and public support made him a prominent ally of Trump during and after the election cycle.

Following President Trump’s return to office, Musk was tapped to advise a government efficiency initiative and to help establish the Department of Government Efficiency, known as DOGE.

The effort was aimed at reducing federal spending and streamlining government operations.

However, Musk stepped back from that role in mid-2025 as criticism mounted over the scope and feasibility of the initiative, and disagreements between Musk and the administration became more public.

Tensions escalated further when Musk openly criticized Trump-backed spending legislation.

In a June 3 post on X, Musk voiced frustration with what Trump described as his “big beautiful bill.”

“I’m sorry, but I just can’t stand it anymore,” Musk wrote at the time.

“This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,” Musk added.

President Trump responded publicly to the criticism, expressing disappointment in Musk’s comments while acknowledging their past relationship.

“I was very disappointed,” Trump said at the time, before adding, “Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore.”

The exchange prompted a sharp rebuttal from Musk, who took to X to argue that his support had been decisive in the 2024 election.

“Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,” Musk wrote.

During the height of the dispute, Musk also floated the idea of forming a new political party, further fueling speculation about a lasting rift between the two men.

Despite the public nature of the disagreements, both Trump and Musk appeared to soften their tone as 2025 progressed.

In September, the two were seen shaking hands at conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s memorial service, held in a box at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona.

The public appearance suggested a possible thaw, though neither addressed the status of their relationship at the time.

Musk later attended a White House dinner in November, where President Trump hosted Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, adding to indications that lines of communication between the billionaire and the administration had been restored.

The question of whether Musk had fully reentered Trump’s inner circle was raised publicly during a Cabinet meeting on Dec. 2.

FOX Business correspondent Edward Lawrence asked the president whether Musk was “back in [his] circle of friends” following their falling out.

“Well, I really don’t know. I mean, I like Elon a lot,” Trump replied.

The weekend dinner at Mar-a-Lago, paired with Musk’s upbeat public remarks, has renewed speculation about the future of their relationship as Trump’s administration continues into 2026.

While neither has formally addressed whether Musk will take on an advisory role again, the public gestures suggest that the once-strained alliance between the president and the tech billionaire may be stabilizing after a period of high-profile disagreement.

News

Trump Says Venezuelan Dictator Nicolas Maduro and His Wife Have Been Captured

The United States carried out a military operation against Venezuela early Saturday that included strikes across multiple regions and resulted in the capture and removal of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, according to an announcement by President Donald Trump.

In a statement posted Saturday morning, President Trump said the operation targeted Venezuela and its leadership and confirmed that Maduro and his wife were taken into custody and flown out of the country.

“The United States of America has successfully carried out a large-scale strike against Venezuela and its leader, President Nicolas Maduro, who has been, along with his wife, captured and flown out of the Country,” Trump wrote.

“This operation was done in conjunction with US Law Enforcement. Details to follow.”

Explosions were reported beginning around 2 a.m. local time in and around Caracas during the operation.

Reports indicated that at least seven explosions were heard in the capital city. Low-flying aircraft were observed over Caracas during the early morning hours as the strikes unfolded.

The strikes affected multiple locations, including sites in the state of Miranda, where Caracas is located, as well as nearby Aragua and La Guiera.

The explosions sent smoke and fire into the air and caused power outages in affected areas.

Photographs from the capital showed fire burning through Fuerte Tiuna, Venezuela’s largest military complex located in Caracas, following an explosion at the site.

Residents in Caracas reacted to the blasts as they moved through the city streets.

“The whole ground shook. This is horrible. We heard explosions and planes in the distance,” Carmen Hidalgo said.

“We felt like the air was hitting us.”

As the military activity continued, the Federal Aviation Administration issued a Notice to Air Missions early Saturday prohibiting all U.S. commercial aircraft from operating at any altitude within Venezuelan airspace.

The restriction was issued because of what the FAA described as ongoing military activity.

The U.S. Embassy in Caracas also issued guidance advising Americans not to travel to Venezuela and urging U.S. citizens currently in the country to leave.

The Venezuelan government denounced the operation, calling it an act of aggression by the United States and a violation of the United Nations charter.

In a statement, the government said the objective of the attack was to seize Venezuela’s strategic resources.

“The objective of this attack is none other than to seize Venezuela’s strategic resources, particularly its oil and minerals, attempting to forcibly break the nation’s political independence,” the statement said.

“They will not succeed. After more than two hundred years of independence, the people and their legitimate government remain steadfast in defense of sovereignty and the inalienable right to determine their own destiny.”

Following the strikes, Maduro declared a state of emergency and ordered all national defense plans to be implemented.

The declaration granted expanded authority to the armed forces and allowed for the suspension of certain rights. A government statement called on citizens to mobilize.

“Today, with the spirit of Bolivar, Miranda, and our liberators, the Venezuelan people rise up once again to defend their independence against imperial aggression. People, take to the streets!” the statement said.

In a video address aired earlier in the week, Maduro accused the United States of seeking to force a change in Venezuela’s government and gain access to the country’s oil reserves.

Maduro, 63, has held power in Venezuela for 13 years and has been charged by the United States with narco-terrorism.

One day before the strikes, he met with a special envoy for Chinese President Xi Jinping at the presidential palace in Caracas to reaffirm ties with China amid growing tensions with the United States.

Regional leaders responded to the operation as reports emerged. Colombian President Gustavo Petro said Venezuela had been attacked and called for an emergency meeting of the Organization of American States and the United Nations.

“Right now they are bombing Caracas. Alert to the whole world, they have attacked Venezuela,” Petro wrote.

“They are bombing with missiles. The OAS and the UN must meet immediately.”

Cuban officials also condemned the strikes. “Our ‘Peace Zone’ is being brutally assaulted. State terrorism against the brave Venezuelan people and against Our America,” Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel said.

“Homeland or Death We Shall Overcome!”

Maduro had previously claimed that his government was willing to discuss an agreement with the United States aimed at preventing drug trafficking.

“The US government knows, because we’ve told many of their spokespeople, that if they want to seriously discuss an agreement to combat drug trafficking, we’re ready,” Maduro said in a recorded interview broadcast on state television.

The U.S. military has carried out drone strikes off the Venezuelan coast targeting suspected drug-smuggling boats, and Maduro’s remarks came shortly after a drone strike on a docking area believed to be used by cartels.

Venezuela has detained at least five Americans following the latest round of U.S. military and economic pressure.

One detainee, James Luckey-Lange of Staten Island, has said he was wrongfully detained while crossing the Venezuelan border during a long trip across Latin America.

News

Politico Propagandist Suggests Somalis Use Lethal Force Against Reporters Exposing Fraud

Rob Schmitt and Sebastian Gorka criticized a Politico article and its promotion on social media during a discussion that also featured video from a former Department of Homeland Security whistleblower, arguing that the reporting normalized violence while downplaying what they described as large-scale fraud involving taxpayer funds and potential links to terrorism.

Schmitt opened the exchange by citing a post from a Senior Legal Affairs reporter for Politico, which referenced Stand Your Ground laws in the context of journalists investigating alleged Somali-run scam operations in Minneapolis.

“This is the Senior Legal Affairs reporter for Politico posting on x at some point, the amateur effort to knock on doors of home daycares intersects with robust Stand Your Ground laws,” Schmitt said.

“What is being exposed right now is so dangerous for the left, for the Democrat Party, for the people that this fake reporter supports, that he’s essentially hoping that one of these Somali refugees running one of these scam operations in Minneapolis, I guess, shoots reporters that are going to knock on the door.”

Gorka responded by rejecting the comparison drawn in the article and accusing the outlet of distorting self-defense laws.

“Yeah, I’m going to have to take your word for it. Rob that’s an actual real quote from one of these fake news outlets, the idea that you’re conflating what a burglar breaking into your house and being allowed to use deadly force against that burglar, as opposed to a young reporter who is getting to the bottom of billions of dollars of built taxpayer funding,” Gorka said.

He went on to argue that the real wrongdoing lay with those allegedly misusing public funds.

“If there are any burglars in this story, it’s not the young, fearless journalist; it’s the Somali community members who are stealing your taxpayer funds, my taxpayers’ funds, and had signs for their learning centers where they can’t even spell the word learn grammatically correctly,” Gorka said.

Schmitt returned to the Politico reporter’s role, questioning the intent behind the reporting and its political implications.

“This is a Senior Legal Affairs reporter for Politico? And does anything indicate better that the threat that this reporting, that this story has on all the institutions that this he claims to be a reporter, he’s not a reporter. He’s not a reporter. He’s a propagandist for the left in this country, for the Democrat Party,” Schmitt said.

He added that the exposure of alleged fraud threatened broader support for government programs.

“Who is going to want to vote for more government and for bigger safety nets when they see that all of our money is just being lit on fire and just dumped into refugees coming here and scamming us out of billions of dollars?” Schmitt asked.

Gorka argued that the language used in the article amounted to a call to violence.

“Well, look, I think there’s two things that need to be said. Number one, that article that quote, unquote legal expert is doing what the left always does, which is normalizing violence,” Gorka said.

“That’s a dog whistle talking about, stand your ground, legal authorities, that’s about the use of deadly force.”

He framed the issue as one that should concern Americans regardless of politics.

“There can’t be anybody in America who who agrees with what we’re witnessing in these reports,” Gorka said.

“If you’re just a normal human being and you go, hang on a second, this is just wrong. This is my money.”

Schmitt then introduced video from a former Minnesota DHS whistleblower, noting past warnings about the misuse of funds.

“You’re talking about counterterrorism reports for the last month of Somali fraud funds being sent to Al Shabaab,” Schmitt said.

“You have a former Minnesota DHS whistleblower that said, seven years ago, talking about this same issue.”

In the clip, the whistleblower described concerns investigators had following terrorist attacks overseas.

“Every time there was a terrorist attack, Paris, San Bernardino, France, Paris, even the Syrian war, we would as investigators, We would get together the day after the attack, and we would think we would ponder amongst ourselves, how much Minnesota taxpayer dollars was being used to fund that war, that attack, what bought that gun? Where that money come from?” the whistleblower said.

Reacting to the clip, Schmitt called the statement alarming.

“That’s an unbelievable statement from seven years ago, and it makes you realize just how much of this money could have been going to these places,” he said, asking how authorities planned to determine where the funds ended up.

Gorka responded by citing current enforcement efforts and recent arrests. “I’ll quote, I think it was on a news program earlier today on Newsmax, where I saw the Secretary Noem at DHS state, unequivocally, this is going to be one of the largest investigations at DHS,” Gorka said, referring to investigations into alleged fraud involving immigrants and taxpayer funds.

He also referenced a recent case. “Recent arrest in Texas of somebody who has now been charged with material support to ISIS for trying to wire $38 to ISIS,” Gorka said, adding that the broader concern involved “potentially millions of dollars leaving America from those fraudulent entities to fund terrorist organizations abroad.”

“So we have only just begun,” Gorka said.

“We are on the case, and people will face justice.”

WATCH:

News

104-Year-Old WWII Veteran Sparks ‘USA’ Chants With National Anthem

A 104-year-old World War II veteran brought an NHL crowd to its feet Saturday night after delivering a national anthem performance that turned a routine pregame ceremony into a moment of remembrance and patriotism, as reported by the Gateway Pundit.

Dominick Critelli, a longtime New York Islanders fan, took center ice at UBS Arena in Elmont, New York, holding a soprano saxophone rather than a microphone.

Instead of singing “The Star-Spangled Banner,” Critelli played it, recreating a tradition he once carried out overseas during World War II, according to News 12 Long Island.

As the final notes echoed through the arena, the crowd erupted into sustained applause and chants of “USA,” a moment that was captured on video and quickly spread across social media.

Critelli later explained that the performance was not about personal recognition but about honoring the men he served with during the war who never returned home.

“That’s why I go to these places, I want to do it, I want to represent them, to do something for them. That’s all I can do for them,” Critelli told the news station.

Critelli said he has been playing music for more than 90 years. His military service, however, remains the defining chapter of his life.

According to the NHL, Critelli spent 151 days in combat during World War II and survived some of the war’s most dangerous operations.

He lived through the Battle of the Bulge and flew missions behind enemy lines, delivering critical supplies to American troops who had been cut off from support.

His service earned him the European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal with three Bronze Stars, as well as the American Theater Medal, the World War II Victory Medal, and a Good Conduct Medal.

According to the New York Post, Critelli was born in Italy, a background that gave him a personal view of the war’s consequences in Europe.

“I love this country,” Critelli told the outlet.

“If I hadn’t come home to this country, I’d be stuck with Mussolini,” he added.

Critelli now lives in Floral Park, New York, and continues to make public appearances to honor fellow veterans and fallen service members.

His anthem performance was met with an emotional response inside the arena, with fans standing, clapping, and chanting as he finished the song.

The tribute also appeared to set the tone for the Islanders on the ice. Following Critelli’s performance, New York defeated its cross-state rivals, the New York Rangers, 2-0.

The moment served as a rare instance where sports, history, and patriotism converged in front of a national audience.

For many in attendance, the performance was a reminder of the sacrifices made by members of the Greatest Generation and the enduring legacy of those who served.


Scroll to Top