Author name: Alec Johnson

Media

Media Matters Meltdown: Far-Left Smear Machine Starts Laying Off Staff

The hard-left smear machine “Media Matters” is getting a taste of its own cancellation medicine, and its employees don’t like it one little bit. Media Matters presents itself as a watchdog over right-wing media and public figures, but acts more like a propaganda company dedicated to ruining their political opposition by any means necessary.

The company announced it had to lay off at least a dozen staff May 24, and it’s blaming that on X (Twitter) owner Elon Musk. Last fall Musk sued Media Matters, claiming the company deliberately made up a “report” to scare advertisers away from buying space on X. The suit accuses Media Matters of manipulating X’s algorithm to make it appear that mainstream advertisers spots were appearing next to “racist” or “Nazi” content from platform users, when in fact they were not.

My, how the worm has turned. Media Matters makes its money by dishonestly targeting conservative commentators to make them appear dangerous and insane. One of their favorites is Daily Wire host Matt Walsh, who jokingly calls himself a theocratic fascist dictator. Media Matters pretends to take his obviously sarcastic and satirical seriously. Here’s just a small sample :

The author, transgender writer Ari Drennen, is now (to the amusement of millions) among those also identifying as unemployed.

Some of Media Matters’ favorite targets are having great fun rubbing salt in the wound. The Babylon Bee’s Kyle Mann:

Musk himself couldn’t help but laugh too:

Another now-unemployed crusader, Media Matters’ chief anti-Israel and anti-Tucker Carlson voice Kat Abu, is having a very bad day too:

Last year Kat Abu was crowing about Fox News firing Tucker Carlson:

And it looks like the general public on X isn’t too sympathetic, either:

Crime Denial

Illinois Democrats Look to Change the Term “Offender” – And You’ll Never Believe What They’re Replacing It With

Scientist Steven Pinker calls it the “euphemism treadmill,’ that whenever a term for something—a kind of person, a phenomenon—gets to a certain age, people itch to replace it with something they think is nicer. What that means is that people want to wash away any negative or unflattering connotations of a current term and replace that term with a new one. That’s exactly what the Illinois legislature is doing with its official new term for “offender” for criminal.

As Pinker put it; “People invent new ‘polite’ terms to refer to emotionally laden or distasteful things.”’ It’s easy to see this over the course of just a few decades. In the 1970s and 80s, the term “mentally retarded” was a new euphemism (yes, that’s right, that term was a euphemism) for people formerly called “morons” or “imbeciles”. But society has now become re-offended by “retarded,” and insists that we refer to such people as “developmentally delayed,” or “developmentally challenged.” The federal government changed its term from “retarded” to “intellectual disability” in 2013, but today that new euphemism is starting to be frowned on because it’s just too uncomfortably accurate.

The euphemism treadmill sometimes brings new terminology that is less clear, and often edging right up to dishonesty, adding a flattering connotation to something that one wouldn’t or shouldn’t be proud of. For Exhibit A, check out what PC Democrats are doing in the Illinois legislature.

The word “offender” is now out, according to a bill on the Illinois governor’s desk. From now on, if you’ve broken the law and end up in jail, you are a “justice-impacted individual.” The woke and the “caring” never know when to stop, and too few conservatives make any real effort to put obstacles in their path.

Notice the parallel here to the recent shift from the term “homeless” to “un-housed.” It’s sly and subtle, but it’s wicked. “Un-housed” describes homeless people in the passive voice, implying that some outside body or entity did not “house” that person. It suggests that society, or cities, or states, have somehow failed in a moral duty to give people “housing.” The term disappears personal responsibility, making it impossible to even ask whether homeless people have done anything to contribute to their circumstances.

Illinois’ new “justice-impacted individual” for jailbirds is even bolder. It turns actual villains into victims. Instead of recognizing the burden a criminal has placed on their victim and society, it pretends that convicts have been “impacted” by the justice system. What else would you expect from the woke?

At least a few conservative lawmakers tried to push back. Illinois Republican Senator Terri Bryant said, “Over and over again, we keep changing the name of how we are referring to those who have entered into criminal activity and each time we make that change, each agency has to make that change on every one of their documents.”

Unfortunately, this has been to no avail.


Scroll to Top