Author name: Alec Johnson

National Affairs

Biden Campaign Deals “Disinformation” with Fake “Trump” Website

/

There seems to be no end to the deception that Joe Biden, his family, and his campaign will engage in to keep the senile octogenarian in the White House this fall. Online conservative news outlet “amuse” has discovered that the Biden campaign bought a domain name and created a website in order to fool Americans into believing Donald Trump was associated with a controversial policy paper called Project 2025.

Amuse claims the Biden campaign has posted the fake site on its Twitter/X account, and that’s been seen by at least 1.5 million users.

Despite the Biden campaign’s lies and the public’s misunderstanding, Project 2025 is not Donald Trump’s creation. It is a project of the conservative Heritage Foundation, and Donald Trump has repeatedly clarified that he does not control it and is not involved with it.

The position paper outlines a “180-day playbook” describing what it hopes a President Trump would do in the first 6 months of the presidency. Some of the policy positions include reinvigorating the concept of the family as the most important part of American life, outlawing porn, retreating from economic relations with China, closing the U.S. border, and getting rid of “non-performing” federal workers.

The fake Biden-created website is trumpsproject2025.com. On Twitter, “amuse” notes that the U.S. Department of Justice seized two Russian domains on the same day that the Biden campaign launched its fake site. Why did they seize the Russian sites? Irony of ironies—for spreading election “disinformation.”

There is so much lying that takes place online that some users did not initially believe the “amuse” report.

Amuse shot back with this:

Others immediately picked up on the “rules for thee, but not for me” operating style of the Biden White House.

Another user pointed out how sloppy power-hungry politicians will get when they correctly detect that there are seldom, if ever, any consequences for them. Be careful though, and note that this user is not actually Elon Musk, but a parody account!

Media, National Affairs, Polling

CNN’s Jake Tapper Shocks Nation By Telling The Truth

/

It’s amazing what a bit of reality can do when it hits someone smack in the face.

Like almost every other legacy news network, CNN has long abandoned any standards of objectivity in journalism. Since at least 2016 when Donald Trump was elected president, the network has joined MSNBC and most others to act as nakedly partisan shills for the Democratic Party. No lie—the “Russiagate” hoax, the denial over Hunter Biden’s laptop— was too untruthful to tell so long as it helped keep Bad Orange Man out of office.

But now, in a segment some are calling the “the greatest CNN segment in history,” Joe Biden has been such a trainwreck that even Jake Tapper is excoriating him.

What makes it so remarkable? Well, the fact that Tapper tells the candid truth and does not pretend that he cannot see what the rest of us can see: Joe Biden is a very old man in the grip of senile dementia. We’re so used to the press blatantly lying about what we can all see that it’s disorienting to hear so much truth from cable news.

Tapper starts out this way: “In reality, 72 percent of voters say they believe President Biden is too old; that’s according to CNN’s most recent polling. Voters have been saying this for quite a long time. The reality is that the Democratic elites are mostly late to acknowledge these age inability issues compared to the rest of the public.”

You’re late, too, Tapper, but we suppose better late than never. Of course, it’s nigh-on impossible for Tapper not to face the truth as he co-moderated the debate between Trump and Biden in which Biden presented to the world as a shambling reanimated corpse.

Tapper then quotes Biden directly to underscore how badly Biden’s brain has declined. He reads the following words from the President:
“Fact of the matter is how can you assure you’re going to be out on you know your way to go you know work tomorrow age age wasn’t you know the idea that I’m too old.”

Then Tapper says, “Keep in mind, that soundbite is supposed to be reassuring.”

Let’s see what Twitter/X users had to say.

Many are appropriately skeptical about CNN’s turn-about.

We feel pretty sure this post speaks for most Wokespy readers:

LGBTQ+

White House Waffles on Kids’ Sex Change Surgeries

/

Like with every issue, the Biden White House cannot figure out its position on so-called “gender affirming care” (also known as “genital mutilation”) for children and minors. First they’re all for it, then they’re for some parts of it but not others, and then they’re back to supporting the most extreme medical interventions. At issue now is whether the White House supports sex-change surgery for kids.

The reason for this waffling appears to be that neither Biden nor anyone in the administration is actually making these decisions. Instead, radical campaigning groups are doing it for them. Sleuths on Twitter/X have put together a chain of rapidly “evolving” statements from the White House after apparent interference from the Human Rights Campaign. HRC began as a gay rights organization but has transformed into a pressure group that endorses the chemical poisoning of children and surgical sex-changes.

It would have us believe there are 2 million people living in the U.S. who are “transgender” and born in the wrong body. And even more unbelievable, we’re to believe that this population somehow sprung up out of nowhere in the past two decades or so.

Let’s walk through the recent White House statements.

Noah Pollak points to evidence that the White House is updating its positions based on feedback from HRC.

This leads to a chain of posts from Jennifer Block, who has “the receipts”:

The White House starts out surprisingly taking the morally sane position, that it’s wrong to give children sex-change hormones and surgeries.

But wait, there’s more:

At first glance, it doesn’t look like a big change, but it is. In the original, the White House opposes surgeries on children, and it keeps that statement of opposition in the update. But it also changes some key phrases, perhaps in order to give itself plausible deniability and wiggle room with activists who definitely want to see child surgeries.

The original statement (emphasis added): “We continue to support gender-affirming care for minors like mental health care and respect the role of parents, families, and doctors in these decisions.”

The updated statement (emphasis added): “We continue to support gender-affirming care for minors, which represents a continuum of care, and respect for the role of parents, families, and doctors in these decisions.”

Would that “continuum” of care include removing the breasts of healthy minor girls?

Jennifer Block shows us the emails from HRC taking pride in their successful push to get the White House to change its statement in mere hours:

“Pressure is working. This would not have happened without all of us.”

Indeed.

Almost half of U.S. states have banned most or all medical interventions for so-called “trans kids”. It’s the conservative states protecting children while liberal states like Vermont and Minnesota create themselves as “sanctuary states” for “trans kids” and facilitate their medical abuse.

When did protecting children from mutilation become a partisan affair?

Left-wing extremism

Idaho Town Bans Crosses in Parade, Residents Disobey

/

Cast your mind back to the turn of the 21st century and you may remember the rise of a group called the “new atheists.” Led by evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, this was an ad-hoc group of scientists, philosophers, and regular people who thought religion had crept too far into government. They seemed particularly concerned with the then-current effort to get so-called “intelligent design” (creationism) into school science classes, but their real goal was the complete irradiation of religion from society.

The war is likely to be rekindled in the courts with Louisiana recently passing a law requiring the 10 Commandments to be displayed in classrooms. Meanwhile, Oklahoma’s state schools superintendent has ordered public schools to teach the Bible.

Over the years, the hostility to religion in public life has gone much farther than even Dawkins might have wanted (as evidenced by recent comments from him praising “cultural Christianity” – and citing Christianity as a bulwark against Islam).

Exhibit A: Coeur D’Alene Idaho, of all places, banned crosses from its 2024 Independence Day Parade. No, we can’t figure out how the city government believed it had the power to overturn citizens’ First Amendment rights this way. Nor can we figure out why the government believed people would obey such an egregious diktat.

Happily, people did not obey. This video shows that for all its trouble, Coeur D’Alene city officials had to watch a parade chock full of Christian symbolism.

It was so epic even some of the non-religious approved of it.

A number of Christians have noted that America isn’t just neutral on faith anymore, it’s actively hostile to Christianity.

There’s always one leftist who goes hyperbolic over anything that’s not their personal favorite:

Tired of woke? Remember that if you say no loudly enough, the bullies cave.

crime, Crime Denial

Dallas Jail Calls Black Illegal Alien Murder Suspect “White”

/

If you like Wokespy, you’d like Blaze commentator and writer Auron MacIntyre. He’s pretty dogged on the woke beat, bringing out example after example of once-normal U.S. institutions gone mad.

This one’s a doozy. Some readers will probably think, “that must be a clerical error.” Must it, though? We live in a country where we are expected to believe and say that men can be women, that children can be born in the wrong body, and that it’s loving health care to mutilate the genitals and endocrine systems of minors.

We also live in a country where we are expected to repeat and believe that black Americans have it as bad or worse now as they did under Jim Crow, and before the Civil Rights Act. Companies are brazenly breaking federal anti-discrimination laws by openly restricting jobs to “people of color,” while the government itself privileges black citizens over white ones.

This writer is not so sure the example below can be chalked up to a typo.

We have a picture of a man that nearly anyone would describe as black or Hispanic-black. There isn’t a single adult of ordinary mental competence who would describe this alleged murderer as a white man.

According to the Blaze article, 44-year-old Yunier Aldazabal stabbed his girlfriend to death then fled in a car. He is an illegal alien, although his country of origin is not yet publicly known.

Why is the Dallas County Jail describing him as white? After all, they have many other options in their system.

Let’s see what social media users think. Several say their states are pulling the same fast one.

Maybe 10 years ago you’d be tempted to say Charmane was a “conspiracy theorist”. But now?

Bob isn’t buying it.

We suspect Terri has it right.

What do you think? Let us know in the comments!

Latest, National Affairs

VP Harris Breaks Irony Meters Across America After SCOTUS Decision

/

It would be cute if it weren’t maddening. Vice President Kamala Harris is worried that a Trump administration would weaponize the government and persecute their political opponents. You’ve got to watch and listen to believe it:

If Trump were to do that, he’d be taking a page out of the Biden/Harris playbook to do so (among that of many other swamp creatures).

Harris was reacting to the recent Supreme Court decision that established that presidents have absolute immunity from legal prosecution for official acts. Chief Justice John Roberts clarified that no president is “above the law,” and that immunity does not apply to non-official acts.

Reversing the truth seems to be the only tool in the left’s belt, and Madam Vice President did it like a pro. In the video, she tells the reporter, “When we have a candidate in Donald Trump who’s openly said he’ll be a dictator on day one, that he will weaponize the Department of Justice against his political enemies, it’s very likely that he could be immune from those kinds of acts.”

The grammatical confusion in the quote above is as spoken by Harris. She goes on to stump for another Biden-Harris presidency, saying the stakes are too high for Americans under Trump.

The rest of the left immediately began shrieking too, of course, and they seemed to reverse the meaning of the court’s ruling. California Rep. Zoe Lofgren gives a good example in theorizing that Biden could dispatch the military to take out conservative Justices in the court.

Of course, the SCOTUS ruling would allow no such thing, and Harris and her ilk know this. But since when has that ever stopped the queen of confusion from tossing us another word salad. After all, this is the woman who can’t stop saying, “I can imagine what can be, unburdened by what has been.” Here’s a greatest hits round up.


Let’s see what Twitter/X users had to say about Harris’ fears of a Trump dictatorship.

This user got it right.

We agree with Heatherheather007.

The mockery just kept coming.

Left-wing extremism, Media

Oh, the Humanity! WaPo Columnist Jen Rubin’s Crackpot History

/

Oh, Jennifer.

Jennifer Rubin, the Washington Post columnist, has managed the neat trick that a faction of politicians have. Despite spilling almost all of her ink on how terrible-horrible-no-good-very-bad Donald Trump is, she’s still referred to as a “conservative.” Of course, it’s perfectly possible to be a conservative who doesn’t like Donald Trump. But when one appears to make a full-time job out of it, it’s fair to ask which side of the bread the butter is really on.

Rubin really put her foot in it on Twitter/X recently, but let’s start with her branding and presentation.

“Dissenting” seems to be a trend among American women this past decade. They’re dissenting in pussy hats against “patriarchy,” they dissent while beatifying the late Supreme Court justice Ruth Ginsberg, they put on Dutch maid costumes and dissent against abortion laws, as depicted here in a scene from the Texas statehouse this week.

This week, Jennifer is dissenting about the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity by lifting the histrionic line from Justice Sotomayor’s minority opinion.

Again, Rubin presents herself as a conservative for reasons unknown, but she’s plumping for the Biden-Harris ticket.

Ah, “our democracy.” The 2024 mating cry of middle-aged female leftists.

In one blast from the past, she got completely destroyed during an appearance on The O’Reilly Factor when she was pressed for evidence of her arguments by O’Reilly, leading to her flipping through pages of notes only to realize she had nothing of substance.

But this contribution on the Biden age issue takes the cake, where she attempts to make a Nazi analogy (how original) that backfired instantly due to people actually understanding history.

One almost feels bad for her (almost). Rubin is trying to mock those voting for Trump by making an analogy to the 1932 elections in Germany. But she has it backward—Germans voted for Hindenburg, not for Hitler, in 1932. She got “Community-noted” on Twitter—that’s when a number of people correct a misstatement. The correction appears along with the original tweet.

The fun is in the reactions.

You just knew someone would do this.

User KH wonders if Jennifer has had a tipple.

Economics

Shark Tank’s “Mr. Wonderful” Says DEI is Deadly for Biz

/

Investor and sometime reality TV Star Kevin O’Leary has had it with companies drifting ever-leftward. “Mr. Wonderful,” famous for his appearances on the reality show Shark Tank, spoke to NBC News about the farm-supply chain Tractor Supply’s recent decision to axe all spending on “woke” causes.

The company recently said it would stop cooperating with LGBTQ pressure group Human Rights Campaign, it’s getting rid of all positions having to do with Diversity Equity and Inclusion (DEI), and it won’t be spending on any social issues outside of its mission to serve rural Americans.

During an appearance on NBC, O’Leary said Tractor Supply’s recent move was a case study he’s going to add to his teaching practice at Harvard business school. Anheuser-Busch, O’Leary noted, is still “losing market share” over its disastrous partnership with a crossdressing man for a publicity campaign.

He asks students one question: “Who do you serve when you start a business?” O’Leary says the order of priority for any business should be: 1. customers 2. employees 3. investors.  Why would a business focused on rural farm supplies be catering to an urban, leftist agenda?

“I think this company is looking at it saying, are we really responsible for climate change? A social agenda? Gender identity? Are these the things that we should actually be investing in or should we take care of our customers?,” he asked.

It seems like a simple, obvious question, but it also seems like few American corporations have asked it of themselves. According to business researchers at Harvard, American companies spend about $8 billion annually on DEI initiatives that likely have nothing at all to do with their bottom line.

O’Leary had a good time sending up the lecturing tone of the woke hucksters when he jokingly asked if the “hog community” on a farm really cares about the social justice spending done by the farm feed store. You can watch the whole segment below.

“The pendulum is swinging back to normalcy,” O’Leary said. “American is saying enough already, this stuff is too crazy, it doesn’t work, it’s not the core of what a business is about.”

It’s a biased sample, of course, but those who read O’Leary’s Twitter/X feed seem to agree.

Some wish O’Leary had gone even farther.

Does a company’s spending on political or social issues influence your decision about whether to patronize them? Tell us in the comments.

Economics

Tractor Supply Says “No More Woke”

/

Conservatives love to use the phrase, “Go woke, go broke,” but too often it’s been more of a wish than a reality.

That may be changing.

For years—since at least 2015—corporations have eagerly adopted every leftist demand for “cultural change.” Environmental and Social Governance (ESG)? Check. Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI)? Check. Let men who claim to be women use the ladies’ room at the office? Check.

Despite protest from customers, companies have barreled ahead aiming at a spot to the left of Karl Marx. Any patron who didn’t like it was either ignored, or blamed for being insufficiently enthusiastic about the sexualization of children. Disney is famous, for example, for blaming the poor box office receipts for its offerings on “sexist” and bigoted audience members.

But in 2024, “go woke, go broke” is starting get closer to reality. Anheuser-Busch destroyed the Bud Light brand overnight when a former executive decided to team up with a crossdressing gay man to “celebrate” “diversity.” The company lost $27 billion in market value.

It looks like rural farm-supply chain Tractor Supply knows which way the wind is blowing and wants to stay out of the storm. Filmmaker Robbie Starbuck has been after the company for weeks for its spending on woke causes such as anything labeled “LGBTQ+”.

Tractor Supply’s customers were none too pleased to know their dollars were going to organizations that wanted to teach schoolchildren about “alternative” sexualities.

In a surprisingly frank turn-around, Tractor Supply just announced it’s dropping Woke. All of it. You can read the whole statement here.

The highlights? Tractor Supply won’t be cooperating with the LGBTQ pressure group Human Rights Campaign any longer, they won’t be sponsoring any pride festivals, and they’re not going to be spending on any more “non-business activities” unless those focus on farming, agriculture, animals, and veterans’ issues.

Reaction on social media has been overwhelmingly positive. Antiwoke muckraking account LibsofTikTok showed right up:

People appreciate the honest and candid approach the company took.

They’ve won back some customers who walked away, too.

But there’s always one or two die-hard activists making a sour face.

What do you think of Tractor Supply’s decision? Tell us in the comments.

Big Cities

San Francisco Punishes Small Business for Having the Nerve to Be Crime Victims

/

Blue state governments hate you more than you know if you’re a taxpaying, revenue-generating citizen or small business. No, it doesn’t make any sense that governments would work to make everything harder for the very people who fund their overreach, but they do.

British business professor Stafford Beer coined the phrase, “the purpose of a system is what it does.” It explains why systems like governments, bureaucracies, and policies so often produce outcomes that have nothing to do with their stated purpose.

Beer’s formula is perfectly illustrated by the San Francisco code department’s persecutory actions against small businesses. Everyone knows the city by the bay has turned into a city-sized outdoor bathroom and 21st century opium den. Crazed drug addicts, the homeless with their tents, and thieving criminals have made the streets unwalkable and the city unlivable.

They’ve also made it almost impossible to run a business. But the city itself is the biggest villain. When the eyecare practice Pacific Vision Foundation discovered they were losing business because patrons could not get past the homeless tents on the front sidewalk, PVF found a solution. They installed beautiful flower planters on the sidewalk. It worked; the tents went away. But then the city’s department of public works, the same city that refuses to clear out the vagrants, sent PVF a code violation citation for not getting a planter permit.

The city continues to punish small businesses for the actions of criminals. Check out this news clip about a corner store that’s thinking of closing shop. After criminals busted their glass doors, the city came down on the store for the code violation of not fixing the damage fast enough.

California used to be the golden land of dreams and opportunities, but those days are gone and people are noticing. Here’s some online reaction.

“Anarcho-tyranny” is a great way to describe how states like California are run.

We like the way Aphealia thinks.

Suppose you have to laugh!


Subscribe Form

© 2025 WokeSpy All Rights Reserved

Scroll to Top