Author name: Josh Slocum

Take a look at this individual:

What do you see? If you’re like most people, you probably see someone who looks male with long hair, but “most people” also aren’t willing to say that you see that in public. Noticing real things, such as the obvious sex of other people, has been forbidden since about 2014 when Time Magazine put a transvestite on the cover and told us that trans activism was the “next civil rights frontier.”

The man in the photo is Christopher Scott Williams, a transgender “woman” (male) that was placed in a women’s prison – only to then predictably sexually assault his female cellmate. The inmate is now suing the State Department of Corrections.

That’s right. This man convicted of child molestation was placed in a women’s prison. If that shocks you, you have not been reading the news. For at least 10 years in America and other Western countries, woke prison officials have decided that men who put on panties and claim to be ladies are, in fact, ladies, and should be housed with ladies. No, they apparently see no potential for violent problems. Or, probably more accurately, they know exactly what’s going to happen and they simply don’t care. 

It is impossible to know how many men are in women’s prisons, as officials are actively lying to the public and hiding reality.

In the current case, convicted child molester Williams, who claims to be a woman, got himself a nice spot in a women’s prison in Washington. An actual female inmate (she’s out now) alleges that he raped her, and she’s suing the prison. According to the Daily Mail, Williams beat a male prison guard so violently the guard lost consciousness. 

Yet, between the fact that Williams is a man and the fact that he molested children, prison officials could not see any reason at all to question the wisdom of putting a woman in a locked cell with him. When are we going to wake up from this madness? 

Here’s what X/Twitter users had to say. 

Here’s another example:

Most social media users seem to see the insanity of it all, and they’ve had enough. 

The Trump inauguration cannot come fast enough. For years Americans have been lied to by the government, obviously, but it’s become unbearable to hear government officials straight up tells us that we’re not seeing what we’re seeing. 

At least 15 people are dead in New Orleans after the latest Islamist attack. According to cops, 42-year-old Shamsud Din Jabbar (laughably referred to as “of Texas” by media) plowed his pickup truck into a crowd on Bourbon street, killing 10 and injuring many more on the first day of 2025. Jabbar then jumped out of the rented truck and opened fire on police. Thankfully, none of the cops were hurt, and Jabbar was shot dead. 

Amazingly, the FBI initially claimed that this was *not* a terrorist event.

“This is not a terrorist event,” the FBI spokeswoman declares confidently. How could she even doubt terrorism as a motive in the immediate aftermath. It’s even worse than that – because an ISIS flag had been found on the truck used to carry out the attack. That would, yes, make this a “terrorist event.”

Hell, you can see the flag on a pole on the back of the suspect’s truck!

Why is the FBI insisting on lying about the obvious murderous intent displayed by so many Muslim immigrant men who end up in the United States? No, it isn’t most Muslims, or most Muslim immigrants. But it’s obviously a much higher percentage than it should be. Does the FBI consider itself American? Does it care about its own country, or even the safety of the families of its own agents and employees? 

There’s more. If the report from this X/Twitter account is accurate, Jabbar has donated at least twice to the progressive Democrat PAC ActBlue:

We can probably look forward now to being told by the Democratic National Committee and its adherents that Jabbar was a “far-right extremist,” too. I mean, why not? Despite attack after attack by Muslims, our own government assures us that it’s conservative American white men who pose the greatest danger to our society. 

Let’s take the temperature on X:

Heh!

Modern life seems like a constant exercise in watching society and its people forget reality. Things that everyone knew yesterday are suddenly “not known.” Basic rules of fair and ethical conduct, we find, aren’t so basic after all. Take the issue of “trans.” Before about 10 years ago, no one really believed there was such a thing as “being born in the wrong body.” No one actually believed that people could change their sex by declaration, or by surgery. 

Then, all of a sudden, not only did people “forget” what they knew yesterday, but they punished everyone around  who reminded them of the reality that they too participated in until the winds changed. It became unspeakable to question anything “trans,” even if the surgeons were chafing at the bit to mutilate children. And now, we await a Supreme Court decision on whether the state of Tennessee has the legal right to forcibly stop surgeons and parents from permanently mutilating children’s genitals. 

That’s where “forgetting” reality leads. We have to actually ask the court if it’s legal and allowed to prevent child abuse. 

The issue of race is treated the same. If you’re middle-aged or older, you grew up in a world that watched, or learned about in school, the civil rights movement of the 1960s. The typical American was weaned on Martin Luther King’s insistence that the content of one’s character, not the color of one’s skin, ought to determine how one was treated in society. In short, we learned that racial discrimination was wrong. 

Until we “forgot.” And we have forgotten, but only in one direction. Don’t be fooled: America in 2024 is a quite racist country, but the racism is against whites. The left has successfully shut up, scorned, and cancelled just about everyone who has the temerity to notice it, but those days look like they’re coming to an end. 

It won’t end without more ludicrous tussles over basic reality, though. Take a look at what LibsofTikTok found:

The state of Minnesota is baldly practicing discrimination against aspiring white teachers by dangling financial assistance in front of students so long as they’re not white. It’s incredible. It’s unbelievably brazen. It is the very textbook definition of racism.

And it’s illegal. Federal law has long banned race-based provision of educational and employment opportunities. Everyone knows this. Until they “forgot” it conveniently when it came to white people. 

Will Minnesota pay any price for this? We can only hope that the incoming Trump administration will take action. But the public is fully fed up judging from the reactions on X/Twitter. 

“And when you shut the government down, people don’t get paid. And maybe if none of us got paid if the government shut down some people on the other side of the aisle would feel differently.”

Thus spoke Connecticut Representative Rosa DeLauro, a Democrat, naturally. The longtime Congress-creature is best-known for her histrionic tantrums whenever the C-Span cameras are rolling. This time she was going off about the possibility of a government shut-down over the now-annual-and-boring tug of war about the budget in Congress. As this goes to press, news just came in that the House and Senate finally passed a bill to keep the government open, which Biden then signed.

DeLauro will be happy, but what about the rest of us? As a liberal, DeLauro is out of touch by definition with what the majority of the country thinks about the government. Now, we haven’t conducted a poll, but it’s a fair guess that at least half the voting population would cheer if the D.C. pigs got their trough taken away and sent home over Christmas. “Keep civil servants and politicians getting paid!” is not a rallying cry that works on any normal human who doesn’t collect a paycheck taken from other people’s money. 

But it’s not politics I want to draw your attention to, but style. Batshit crazy style. Take a look at Rosa over the years. 

As of press time we can neither confirm nor deny the veracity of rumors speculating that DeLauro may be a missing link to the Skeksis of Dark Crystal renown. 

DeLauro has a bee in her considerable bonnet over Elon Musk, as is the case for leftist crones generally. Shaking her shoulders and fairly spitting during her Congressional tirade, DeLauro derisively accused the tech billionaire of responsibility for the then-looming government shut-down, ejaculating “President Musk!” in fury at the podium, practically shaking as she spoke.

Watch the embarrassing performance below:

Elon caught wind of the speech – firing back “When they said ‘DC swamp creatures,’ I thought it was just a metaphor.”

Aaaaand it looks like Twitter/X users beat this writer to the punch. 

Gelflings, beware.

There are predators all around us. Human predators. We find it easy to recognize danger in wild animals like wolves and bears. Well, most of us do. If you’re looking for exceptions just scan the news for stories about wildlife encounters in Yellowstone National Park. Every year dozens of tourists (at least) seem to believe they’re at Yogi Bear’s Jellystone instead of the real thing. Human visitors try to get up close and personal with grizzlies and bison, and they pay the price.

But people have a much harder time recognizing predators of their own species. Despite our obsession with the true crime genre, the majority of everyday people seem largely unaware of when someone is wearing a “mask” of gentility and respectability. Predatory people try to blend in with “normies” for obvious reasons: it’s easier to snare a target who can’t see them coming. Serial rapist and killer Ted Bundy crafted his image with the use of props to appear unthreatening to his female targets; he drove a VW bug, which was supposed to make people think he was a “square” who liked sensible and economical cars. You know, like a professor. He also hobbled around on fake crutches, like a bird feigning a broken wing. 

Socially predatory people have found a boon in the modern transgender mania. Men who are up to no good figured out that they can fool plenty of people—particularly empathetic women—into believing they’re soft and gentle by wearing makeup and acting in a way that they think makes them appear feminine and non-dangerous. 

Take trans activist Jeffrey Marsh. He wears sparkly makeup and talks in a simpering, lispy falsetto when he records his seemingly endless social media messages about “trans rights” and what terrible bigots parents are who don’t accept their child’s declaration of being born in the wrong body. Indeed, he’s very, very keen to talk to such children alone without their parents’ knowledge. 

Marsh clearly believes that his sparkle-uncle-aunt-drag routine will lull the gullible into thinking of him as safe and warm, and he’s probably right. But there’s an important lesson here: if someone goes out of their way to present themselves as loving and cuddly, it may be a disguise for less savory motivations. 

It’s impossible to tell how many people are fooled by this act, but it’s clear that many are. Take a look at one of his latest videos where he encourages people to cut off their pro-Trump family members. Marsh is adept at what’s called the “narcissistic reversal.” That’s when someone who bullies or mistreats people presents himself as the actual victim. Marsh is a master, co-opting the sensible advice about how to protect yourself from abuse and bullying by presenting himself and people like him as the victims of social bullies. 

I don’t know about you, reader, but every danger flag in my gut stands up at full-mast when I watch and listen to Marsh. Let’s see what X/Twitter users have to say. 

That last tweet was a good question. How does anyone fail to see through this?