Author name: Jonathan Dillon

Colombia’s Petro Threatens Armed Resistance After Trump Warns Country May Be Next
News

Colombia’s Petro Threatens Armed Resistance After Trump Warns Country May Be Next

/

Colombian President Gustavo Petro on Monday threatened an armed response against the United States following comments by President Donald Trump suggesting Colombia could become the next target in Washington’s expanded war on drugs after U.S. military action in Venezuela, as reported by Fox News.

Petro, a former member of the leftist M-19 guerrilla movement that demobilized in the early 1990s, made the remarks in a post on X after Trump spoke to reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday.

Washington, DC, on June 18, 2025. US President Donald Trump meets Juventus, who will play Emirati club Al-Ain in the 2025 FIFA Club World Cup at Washington’s Audi Field later in the day

Trump’s comments followed the capture and arrest of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.

“Although I have not been a military man, I know about war and clandestinity,” Petro wrote in a message translated from Spanish.

“I swore not to touch a weapon again since the 1989 Peace Pact, but for the Homeland, I will take up arms again that I do not want.”

Petro also rejected Trump’s accusations that he is connected to drug trafficking.

“I am not illegitimate, nor am I a narco,” Petro wrote.

“I only have as assets my family home, that I still pay for with my salary. My bank statements have been published. No one could say that I have spent more than my salary. I am not greedy.”

Trump’s remarks came as he addressed reporters aboard Air Force One, where he warned that Colombia is “very sick too” and is “run by a sick man who likes making cocaine and selling it to the United States, and he’s not going to be doing it very long.”

Trump also claimed Petro has “cocaine mills and cocaine factories.”

When asked directly whether the United States would carry out an operation in Colombia, Trump replied, “It sounds good to me,” before shifting the discussion to his interest in annexing Greenland.

The comments echoed earlier warnings Trump issued in December, when he told Petro he had “better wise up” or risk becoming the next target.

Trump has previously labeled Petro an “illegal drug dealer” and later referred to him as a “lunatic.”

Petro has emerged as one of Trump’s most vocal critics in Latin America.

He has condemned U.S. strikes on suspected drug-smuggling vessels in the Caribbean, previously claiming that many of those killed were “poor fishermen” forced into the drug trade.

In November, Petro referred to Trump as a “barbarian” and temporarily halted intelligence sharing with Washington.

Colombia’s narcotics trade is largely controlled by illegal armed groups, including the Gulf Clan, the ELN, and dissident factions of the FARC.

Petro has warned that U.S. bombing campaigns would radicalize rural populations, arguing that campesinos would become “thousands of guerrillas in the mountains.”

As previously reported by Fox News Digital, the Trump administration revoked Petro’s U.S. visa over what officials described as reckless actions.

“Earlier today, Colombian president @petrogustavo stood on a NYC street and urged U.S. soldiers to disobey orders and incite violence,” the U.S. State Department said in a post on X at the time.

“We will revoke Petro’s visa due to his reckless and incendiary actions.”

Fox News Digital reported it reached out to the White House for comment following Petro’s latest statements.

Mamdani’s Tenant Advocate Branded Homeownership ‘White Supremacy,’ Urged Property Seizures
News

Mamdani’s Tenant Advocate Branded Homeownership ‘White Supremacy,’ Urged Property Seizures

/

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s newly appointed tenant advocate is facing renewed scrutiny after resurfaced social media posts showed her calling to “seize private property,” labeling homeownership a “weapon of white supremacy,” and urging the election of communists, as reported by The New York Post.

Cea Weaver, recently named director of the city’s Office to Protect Tenants, made the statements in a series of posts on X that were later deleted but have circulated widely after being rediscovered by online researchers.

“Seize private property!” Weaver wrote on June 13, 2018.

She expanded on that view in August 2019, posting what critics have described as a manifesto-style message: “Private property, including any kind of ESPECIALLY homeownership, is a weapon of white supremacy.”

Weaver also urged supporters to “Elect more communists” in a December 2017 post tied to the renaming of a Harlem street corner honoring former Manhattan Rep. Vito Marcantonio, who was openly affiliated with communist politics.

Her social media history also includes harsh criticism of law enforcement. In May 2020, amid national unrest following the death of George Floyd, Weaver wrote, “The Police Are Just People The State Sanctions To Murder W[ith] Immunity.”

Weaver is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America and previously served as a campaign coordinator for Housing Justice For All.

She also acted as an adviser to Mamdani’s mayoral campaign in 2025. The New York Post previously identified her as part of a group of progressive activists closely involved in shaping Mamdani’s policy agenda.

In 2019, Weaver was a leading advocate pushing the Democratic-controlled New York State Legislature to tighten rent stabilization laws, a move that significantly strengthened tenant protections while drawing criticism from property owners.

Humberto Lopes, founder and CEO of the Gotham Housing Alliance, said the approach taken by Mamdani and Weaver ignores the realities of housing development and maintenance.

“Without landlords, how to do you build and maintain housing? You think the government is going to do it? Look at NYCHA,” Lopes said, referring to the New York City Housing Authority.

“You put a system in place to destroy landlords. Why are you s–tting on us?”

Mamdani has proposed freezing rents on roughly one million rent-regulated apartments across the city, a plan that would require approval from the Rent Guidelines Board.

Neither Mamdani’s office nor Weaver provided immediate comment on the resurfaced posts.

Separately, Mamdani announced Sunday the appointment of Dina Levy as the new commissioner of Housing Preservation and Development, known as HPD.

Levy previously served as senior vice president of single family and community development at the New York State Division of Homes and Community Renewal.

“Levy is an experienced and fearless housing leader, and I know that she will fight to protect tenants and tackle our housing crisis head-on,” Mamdani said at a press conference in The Bronx.

Mamdani also signed an executive order establishing “Rental Ripoff” hearings across all five boroughs within his first 100 days in office.

The order directs HPD, the Department of Buildings, the Mayor’s Office to Protect Tenants, and the Department of Consumer and Worker Protection to conduct hearings alongside the new Office of Mass Engagement.

“Too many New Yorkers have been forced to pay more for less — living in unsafe, unconscionable, and unaffordable housing,” Mamdani said. “Under my administration, that ends.

Today’s executive order is the first step towards giving New Yorkers a voice in addressing the housing crisis that is pricing them out of our city.”

Levy said her background as a tenant advocate prepared her for the role. “I do know the work ahead will be hard,” she said.

HPD is responsible for enforcing the city’s housing maintenance code, including safety inspections, housing court cases against landlords, and overseeing emergency repairs.

Trump Moves to Cut Off Federal Funding to These Three Deep-Blue States
News

Trump Moves to Cut Off Federal Funding to These Three Deep-Blue States

/

President Donald Trump said he intends to withhold federal funding from Minnesota, California, and Illinois, citing what he described as failures by state leadership and contrasting those states’ governance with crime reductions he attributed to his administration.

Trump made the remarks while discussing federal payments and state responsibilities, focusing first on Minnesota.

He said the state was not contributing to federal payments and that his administration would no longer cover those costs.

“From Minnesota and from the United States. It’s actually more from the United States, because Minnesota puts it and we’re not going to pay it anymore,” Trump said.

“We’re going to have Walz go pay, we’re not going to pay them.”

Trump then expanded his comments to include California and Illinois, stating that federal funding would also be withheld from those states.

He criticized the leadership of both states and said his administration would no longer provide payments under the current circumstances.

“We’re not going to pay California, and we’re not going to pay Illinois with that big slob of a governor that they have that doesn’t run,” Trump said.

In his remarks, Trump focused heavily on crime statistics, which he said improved due to actions taken by his administration.

He said crime was reduced in Illinois and California while asserting that the governors of those states were not responsible for those changes.

“You know, we brought down crime by 25% he didn’t do anything. He’s not doing anything, but they want us to leave,” Trump said.

Trump referenced a specific incident in Illinois to support his criticism of the state’s leadership, citing a day with a high number of violent crimes.

“He had a he had a day where they had 17 murders. Not too long ago, 17 murders and 77 people shot, but 17 died,” Trump said.

Trump said the Illinois governor claimed the state could manage the situation, but Trump rejected that assertion and said federal involvement was responsible for improvements.

“And then he talks about, oh, we can handle he can’t handle it,” Trump said.

“But we pulled back and we’ll go in at the appropriate time, but we’re the ones that brought the crime down.”

Trump said the crime reduction figures he cited were the result of his administration’s actions rather than state-level leadership. He stated that crime fell by 20% in California and that similar improvements occurred in Illinois.

“We brought it down 20% they didn’t bring it down,” Trump said.

“Pritzker didn’t bring it down. Same thing with Gavin Newsom.”

WATCH:

Democrats Melt Down, Side with Narco Terrorist Dictator, and Against the People of Venezuela
News

Democrats Melt Down, Side with Narco Terrorist Dictator, and Against the People of Venezuela

/

Democratic lawmakers sharply criticized President Donald Trump’s overnight military operation in Venezuela on Saturday, while Republicans largely praised the action that resulted in the capture and federal indictment of socialist leader Nicolás Maduro and his wife.

The U.S. operation marked a major escalation in American involvement in Venezuela and prompted immediate reaction on Capitol Hill.

Democrats argued the President lacked legal authority to carry out the operation and claimed it ran counter to U.S. interests.

Republicans, particularly those representing South Florida’s large Venezuelan exile population, described the development as a historic moment for Venezuela and the broader region.

Arizona Sen. Ruben Gallego, a Democrat who has been reported to have presidential ambitions, condemned the action in an early-morning post on X shortly after 3 a.m. Saturday.

“Second unjustified war in my life time,” Gallego wrote.

“This war is illegal, it’s embarrassing that we went from the world cop to the world bully in less than one year. There is no reason for us to be at war with Venezuela.”

Democratic Sen. Andy Kim of New Jersey accused senior members of the Trump administration of misleading Congress about the intent of the operation.

Kim specifically named Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth in his criticism.

“Secretaries Rubio and Hegseth looked every Senator in the eye a few weeks ago and said this wasn’t about regime change,” Kim wrote on X.

Kim also claimed the military action endangered Americans in Venezuela and across the region.

A U.S. official told The New York Times that there were no casualties during the operation.

House Democrats echoed similar concerns, with several lawmakers comparing the strike to previous U.S. military actions in Latin America.

The operation appeared to represent the most direct American military intervention in the region since former President George H.W. Bush ordered the invasion of Panama in 1989.

“He says we don’t have enough money for healthcare for Americans—but somehow we have unlimited funds for war??” Connecticut Rep. Jim McGovern, the ranking Democrat on the House Rules Committee, wrote on X.

Republicans responded forcefully in support of the President, particularly those representing Florida districts with significant Venezuelan, Cuban, and Nicaraguan communities.

Florida Rep. Carlos Gimenez said he spoke with Rubio following the operation and credited Trump with reshaping the region’s future.

“Thank you, President Donald J. Trump, for changing the course of history in our hemisphere,” Gimenez wrote on X.

“This is a historic day in Florida, home to the largest Venezuelan, Cuban, and Nicaraguan exile communities in the nation.”

Florida Sen. Rick Scott also praised the President’s decision, describing it as a major step forward for regional security.

“A new day is here for Venezuela and Latin America,” Scott wrote on X.

“The United States and our hemisphere are safer because of President Trump’s leadership. God bless America and God bless the people of Venezuela!”

Utah Sen. Mike Lee addressed questions about the legality of the operation, stating that Trump likely had the authority to act under the Constitution.

Lee said he spoke with Rubio about the matter following the seizure of Maduro.

“This action likely falls within the president’s inherent authority under Article II of the Constitution to protect U.S. personnel from an actual or imminent attack,” Lee wrote on X.

Lee added that, based on his conversation with Rubio, U.S. military involvement in Venezuela was likely concluded following Maduro’s capture.

The Trump administration has repeatedly characterized Maduro as an illegitimate leader who headed a cartel designated as a terrorist organization and accused of trafficking drugs into the United States.

Federal prosecutors have alleged that Maduro oversaw a corrupt government that leveraged state power to facilitate large-scale narcotics operations.

President Trump dismissed Democratic criticism during a Saturday morning interview with Fox News, arguing that the operation served clear national security objectives.

“All they do is complain,” Trump said.

“They should say, ‘You know what. We did a great job.’ We’re stopping drugs from coming into this country and no one’s been able to do it until we came along.”

The political fallout from the operation underscored sharp divisions in Washington over U.S. military authority, foreign intervention, and the administration’s approach to Latin America, even as celebrations erupted among Venezuelan communities following Maduro’s capture.

Is This the NGO Loophole That Has Allowed Them to Get Away with It?
News

Is This the NGO Loophole That Has Allowed Them to Get Away with It?

/

An exchange between Walter Curt and John Fredricks focused on allegations that taxpayer-funded daycare operations tied to nonprofit organizations are being used to funnel money into political campaigns through complex corporate structures.

Curt said he and his team have uncovered what he described as a widespread scheme involving nongovernmental organizations, limited liability companies, and political donations.

According to Curt, the funding originates from taxpayer dollars that flow into NGOs operating daycare facilities, which then route money into LLCs owned by those same nonprofits.

“It is outrageous. It is outrageous how much fraud there is,” Curt said.

“The bigger thing that you should be looking at is the fact that they’re using these daycares to fund their political campaigns. That’s what we found out over the past couple days.”

Curt said the structure involves NGOs receiving taxpayer funding, transferring money to LLCs they control, and then using those LLCs to make political donations.

“The NGOs get taxpayer dollars. They push it into the LLCs that are owned by the NGOs, and then those LLCs donate to political campaigns,” Curt said.

“It’s insane, but we’re gonna prove it out over the next couple days.”

Fredricks asked Curt to provide a concrete example of how the alleged scheme works in practice.

“Draw that line for me, like, give me an example of a political campaign that got taxpayer money that came from a daycare,” Fredricks said.

Curt pointed to a specific case in Ohio.

“Well, there’s a Somalian Rep. Surprisingly enough, isn’t that strange? There’s a Somalian rep in Columbus, Ohio who four different daycares sent him $2,000 from each one of their daycare facilities,” Curt said.

Curt argued that the scale of the alleged activity could be far larger, suggesting that thousands of NGO-linked LLCs could be involved nationwide.

“Imagine if you’ve got infinite money, John, taxpayer money to fund your political campaigns,” Curt said.

“Let’s cut their money off. That’s the real way we’ve actually taken back this country.”

Fredricks then asked about Curt’s next steps in Ohio.

“So what do you what are your next steps in Ohio?” Fredricks asked.

Curt said he is assembling a team to investigate dozens of businesses tied to nonprofit organizations.

“Well, I’ve got a team of about 10 people that are coming out here now, and we’re all going to go find these businesses,” Curt said.

“I’ve got 73 businesses on one list just for two organizations.”

Fredricks asked Curt to explain how nonprofits could legally operate in a way that allows campaign donations.

“What do you mean by 73 businesses for two organizations? Explain what that means,” Fredricks said.

Curt described how nonprofit organizations can own LLCs, which he said creates a loophole.

“A 501(c)(3) can’t donate to a political campaign,” Curt said.

“But a 501(c)(3) can own an LLC. It’s called a disregarded entity.”

According to Curt, those LLCs are not barred from making political donations.

“There’s nothing stopping those LLCs from them donating to political campaigns just like they can do everywhere else,” he said.

Curt said he believes the donations are structured as many small contributions spread across a large number of LLCs.

“My theory was, well, what if they’ve got 10,000 businesses that sit underneath these NGOs that they then pump into political campaigns,” Curt said.

“If you’ve got 10,000 of them, and they can each donate 2000 you’ve got $20 million per candidate.”

Curt said preliminary findings suggest significant sums may already have been moved through this system.

“The numbers we’ve seen so far, it looks like $30 million just in Minnesota over the past two years,” Curt said.

Curt questioned how such large-scale fraud could occur without assistance from individuals in positions of power and raised concerns about political leadership in Minnesota.

“You don’t hide $9 billion with a fraud, John, you don’t hide that,” Curt said.

“Someone’s helping you. So that’s the question. Who is helping them? Who’s getting a cut? Where are the wheels getting greased? And that’s what we’re working on now.”

WATCH:

X Used in Real Time to Fight Civil Rights Violations with Harmeet Dhillon at the Helm
News

X Used in Real Time to Fight Civil Rights Violations with Harmeet Dhillon at the Helm

/

Attorney Kurt Schlichter and Justice Department official Harmeet Dhillon discussed what they described as a shift in how the Department of Justice responds to emerging issues, particularly those first exposed through social media, pointing to faster investigations and direct action based on online reporting rather than traditional media cycles.

Schlichter said he has been struck by how quickly the DOJ now reacts when an issue gains attention online, calling the approach a significant departure from past practices.

“I’ve been so impressed at how how responsive you are in your division to things that are happening, kind of in the social media world, things that have become visible and kind of erupt,” Schlichter said.

He cited situations in which online reporting quickly prompted federal scrutiny.

“It becomes a thing on social media, and then suddenly the DOJ, is there, going, Yes, we’re aware of this. Now we’re investigating. That’s kind of revolutionary to be that responsive,” he said.

Dhillon agreed and said the shift reflects a willingness by some officials to engage directly with information sources outside traditional media channels.

“Well, I think that’s correct. I mean, there are couple of reasons for that,” she said.

Dhillon argued that many in the legal profession are reluctant to engage online.

“First of all, lawyers are kind of Fuddy duddies about using the internet and being engaged,” she said.

Dhillon noted that she and Schlichter are unusual in combining legal careers with an active social media presence.

“You know, you and I are among the few on the right who have been both successful lawyers and also very actively engaged on social media,” she said.

She explained that her online activity predates her DOJ role. “I have a big social media following from before I joined the DOJ, about 1.5 million plus followers online.”

According to Dhillon, social media provides real-time information that legacy outlets no longer deliver efficiently.

“I do find it a very valuable tool, because you have to keep up,” she said.

“Today, I don’t actually watch television very much. I’m not, you know, I don’t have the TV on in the background, because TV is like 12 to 24, hours behind what’s really happening.”

Dhillon said independent online journalists now drive many of the most important leads. “When the modern day journalist heroes, who are the Nick Shirley’s, and you know the Matt Taibbi and some of these others who you know right or left, they’re the ones who are getting the leads and sharing the stories in real time,” she said. “Those are the ones I pay attention to.”

She added that online accounts can also surface issues involving public institutions.

“Where we get our attention on something, or libs of Tiktok is also a great source for some of our issues involving schools or employment,” Dhillon said.

Dhillon acknowledged that opening investigations based on online information has drawn criticism but defended the practice.

“We do open up investigations based on internet leads, and I am proud of that,” she said.

“I got mocked a little bit by prior pearl clutching DOJ officials and even some former Republican members of Congress.”

She rejected the idea that online engagement is unserious. “I think it’s quote, unquote not serious to be online and engaging with the public. Well, I think it is serious,” Dhillon said.

“I think it is a public calling and a duty.”

Dhillon pointed to a specific case where online reporting led to immediate results without litigation.

“Sometimes simply tweeting about something or writing a letter stops it dead in its tracks,” she said.

“I stopped a ridiculous DEI program in Asheville, North Carolina by reading about it online, responding to a internet journalist whistleblower, sending a letter, and boom, no shots fired in court because they simply stopped what they were doing.”

She said that outcome illustrates what citizens should expect from federal officials.

“That is really effectiveness in action, and that’s what people should expect from their government officials,” Dhillon said.

WATCH:

‘People Will Be in Handcuffs’: Karoline Leavitt Unloads on Tim Walz Over Minnesota Fraud
News

‘People Will Be in Handcuffs’: Karoline Leavitt Unloads on Tim Walz Over Minnesota Fraud

/

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the Trump administration has significantly intensified federal enforcement actions in Minnesota, citing what she described as years of fraud allowed to persist under Gov. Tim Walz’s leadership.

Leavitt said the administration’s actions span multiple federal agencies and include criminal investigations, funding cutoffs, and immigration enforcement.

“Governor Walz is completely incompetent. He always has been, and President Trump has long called him out for his incompetence and his poor leadership in the great state of Minnesota,” Leavitt said.

Leavitt credited independent journalist Nick Shirley with bringing national attention to the issue, saying his reporting played a key role in accelerating federal involvement. “I want to commend Nick Shirley for his incredible video in real journalism that went viral this past week,” she said.

“He epitomizes what New Media looks like and that’s exactly why we, at the White House, under President Trump’s direction, have embraced new media journalists like Nick Shirley.”

According to Leavitt, Shirley’s work has been recognized directly by the administration.

“We’ve welcomed them in to the White House press pool. We invited Nick Shirley to brief the President of the United States at an Antifa roundtable earlier this year,” she said.

Leavitt said the alleged fraud in Minnesota has been under scrutiny by the Trump administration since the beginning of the president’s term, but that recent reporting led to a surge in federal resources.

“This fraud in Governor Waltz’s state in Minnesota is something the Trump administration has been working on since day one,” she said.

“And since Nick Shirley’s journalism really brought this issue further to light, we have surged resources across the board to the state.”

She emphasized that enforcement actions are ongoing and escalating.

“So I want your audience to understand this is a top priority for the administration,” Leavitt said.

Leavitt said the Department of Justice is actively pursuing criminal cases.

“The Department of Justice, as we speak, is continuing to execute search warrants and subpoenas,” she said.

“People will be in handcuffs as a result of the fraud that Governor Walz has allowed to occur for the for many, many years.”

She also detailed Department of Homeland Security operations currently underway in Minnesota.

“The Department of Homeland Security is conducting door to door investigations on the ground at potential fraud sites,” Leavitt said.

“And they’re also, of course, conducting continued deportations of illegal aliens in Minnesota’s communities.”

Leavitt said the administration is also prepared to use additional legal tools when warranted.

“We’re also not afraid to use denaturalization,” she said.

“That’s a tool at the President and the Secretary of State’s disposal, and it’s one this administration has previously used before.”

She said financial pressure is being applied through federal funding restrictions.

“I know the Health and Human Services Department has also announced we are cutting off all childcare funding to the state of Minnesota until we get to the bottom of this fraud,” Leavitt said.

Leavitt added that multiple agencies are reviewing state benefit programs. “The Department of Labor is investigating their unemployment insurance program,” she said.

“The Department of USDA Agriculture Secretary Rollins, weeks ago, sent a letter to Governor Walz, demanding he turn over every single name of SNAP recipients on the books in Minnesota.”

According to Leavitt, those actions prompted legal pushback from the state.

“And the Minnesota Attorney General actually sued the Trump administration for that,” she said.

WATCH:

Eric Adams’ Winter Storm Advice Stuns ABC 7 Anchors
News

Eric Adams’ Winter Storm Advice Stuns ABC 7 Anchors

/

New York City Mayor Eric Adams surprised reporters and viewers Saturday morning after offering unconventional advice to residents as a winter storm brought the city’s heaviest snowfall in years, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

Adams made the remarks during an appearance on ABC 7 Eyewitness News This Saturday Morning, as snow continued to fall across the city.

According to city data, 4.3 inches of snow accumulated in Central Park, marking the heaviest snowfall New York City has seen since 2022.

While discussing the storm’s impact and the city’s response, Adams addressed residents who were staying indoors because of the weather.

“Stay home — this is a good baby-making day,” Adams said, prompting an audible reaction from the anchors.

Co-anchor Toni Yates responded with an “Ahhh!” while fellow anchor Pedro Rivera laughed and joked about a potential “baby boom” in May or June.

The exchange continued lightheartedly on air as Adams expanded on his comments.

“Enjoy the weather,” Adams said. “My son would say, just do ‘Netflix and chill.’ That’s all, and just enjoy the day.” He then added, “We wanna improve the population!”

The mayor also used the appearance to praise the city’s handling of the storm. Adams highlighted the work of New York City’s sanitation department, noting that approximately 2,700 sanitation workers were deployed and working 12-hour shifts to clear streets and roadways throughout the five boroughs.

“They’ve been out there… doing a great job,” Adams said. He also cautioned residents about hazardous conditions, adding, “Whenever you fall, you never forget it.”

City officials warned residents to remain alert for black ice and slippery roads as temperatures fluctuated following the snowfall.

Emergency management officials urged drivers to limit travel where possible and advised pedestrians to use caution on untreated sidewalks.

The storm affected a wide swath of the East Coast beyond New York City. Heavy snow was reported in Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Jersey, eastern Pennsylvania, and western Massachusetts.

The severe weather also disrupted air travel nationwide, leading to more than 1,500 flight cancellations.

Adams’ remarks come as he prepares to leave office. His term as mayor is set to end on January 1, with democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani scheduled to take over as the city’s next mayor.

Despite the surprise generated by his comments, Adams continued to emphasize public safety and credited city workers for keeping major roadways passable during the storm.

No injuries or major accidents were immediately linked to the snowfall in the city, according to preliminary reports.

The interview quickly circulated on social media following the broadcast, drawing attention for the mayor’s off-script remarks during a serious weather event.

‘We Finally Got to See What The Communists Dreamt of Doing in This Country’: Jesse Kelly
News

‘We Finally Got to See What The Communists Dreamt of Doing in This Country’: Jesse Kelly

/

Conservative commentator Jesse Kelly said Americans should pause and reflect on how dramatically the country has changed since the end of the Biden-Harris administration, arguing that the past four years represented a low point marked by radical ideology, government overreach, and national decline.

Kelly framed his remarks as a call to remember what he described as the reality of life under Joe Biden, contrasting it with the present moment and urging Americans not to lose perspective.

“Take a moment, take a moment and just breathe in how different things are now than they were,” Kelly said.

“Do not forget how horrible it was under Joe Biden.”

Kelly argued that Biden’s presidency allowed unelected ideological figures to wield power, claiming the former president was largely absent while others directed policy.

“We finally got to see what the communists really dreamt of doing in this country with total power, because Joe Biden was a cadaver, and so we sat in the corner and Victoria Nuland and Anita Dunn and all the dirty communists in the White House, they got to basically be president for four years,” Kelly said.

He accused the Biden-Harris administration of aggressively targeting conservatives and religious Americans, citing prosecutions related to abortion activism and the January 6 investigations.

“And we watched them,” Kelly said. “We watched them throw pro life pastors in prison as fast as they could. Hunt down January six, there’s over 1000 bragging they’re going to hunt down 1000 more.”

Kelly also criticized the administration’s border policies, claiming they led to a massive influx of foreign nationals and undermined national sovereignty.

“We watched them throw open the border and fly in as many filthy foreigners into this country as they possibly could get in here,” he said.

According to Kelly, these policies were part of a broader effort to dismantle traditional American institutions and values.

“We watched as they tore through every good and decent thing in this country,” he said.

Kelly further condemned the Biden-Harris administration’s embrace of LGBTQ policies and symbolism, arguing it damaged the country’s international standing.

“We watched as they lit the White House up in rainbow colors for LGBTQ Air Force month or whatever,” Kelly said.

“The stupid thing was, we had to suffer while they stuffed trannies in every realm of the government, making us the laughing stock of the planet.”

He described the four-year period as one of deep national suffering and moral decay.

“We suffered mightily for four years while the demented demonic freaks took over the United States of America and set about their evil ways,” Kelly said.

Despite his harsh assessment of the Biden years, Kelly acknowledged that current conditions are not without problems, but said the contrast is still worth appreciating.

“So right now, things may not be going perfectly,” he said.

“I’m more than willing to admit that, but I just want to take a moment every now and then and smell the friggin roses.”

WATCH:

Offshore Wind Projects Stopped as National Security Concerns Mount
News

Offshore Wind Projects Stopped as National Security Concerns Mount

/

Energy Secretary Doug Burgum said multiple offshore wind projects have been halted under President Donald Trump’s administration due to serious national security risks, high costs, and reliability problems, citing a newly completed classified report from the Department of War.

Burgum said the report focuses on how modern warfare has shifted toward drone-based threats and how massive offshore wind turbines can interfere with radar systems critical to detecting those threats along the East Coast.

“Well, Martha, this is a new, recently released, classified report completed by the Department of War that highlights really builds on the story you had just before this, which is Modern Warfare, is drone warfare, and the radar interference caused by these massive, gargantuan projects,” Burgum said.

He described the scale of offshore wind installations, noting that their size and movement create significant radar disruption.

“I mean understanding that a single one of these towers can be one and a half to times taller than the than the Washington Monument,” Burgum said.

“The blades themselves, the diameter the blades is bigger than the Statue of Liberty, two and a half football fields. These things are moving in 150 miles an hour.”

According to Burgum, ground-based radar systems are designed to detect movement, and offshore wind farms create blind spots that could be exploited in an attack.

“Our ground based radar is designed to pick up movement if you wanted to attack a population center on the east coast of our country, you would send a swarm of drones right through one of these wind farms,” he said. “That’s the basis of this understanding.”

Burgum said the administration has implemented a temporary pause on the projects while reviewing mitigation options, but emphasized that the concerns are substantial.

“As we said, we’ve got a 90 day pause. We’ve announced we’re happy to sit down and see if we can try to find mitigation,” Burgum said.

“But this is a real national security concern.”

He also pointed to opposition from multiple groups beyond national security officials, including fishermen, marine regulators, and environmental activists concerned about wildlife impacts.

“And as you also mentioned here, I don’t know that I’ve called these successful because we’ve got the Marine Fisheries, and the fishermen are opposed to these,” Burgum said.

“The people that love the whales are opposed to them because of the whale grounding.”

Burgum said offshore wind also fails on cost and reliability, calling it the most expensive form of energy currently being produced and dependent on foreign supply chains.

“And of course, consumers, if they understood the facts, this is the most expensive form of energy we’re producing, is offshore wind, and so it’s not reliable,” he said.

“It’s only works when the wind is blowing. It’s it is expensive, and of course, it depends on foreign suppliers, almost completely for this industry.”

He argued that a more affordable and dependable alternative already exists for the region, pointing to domestic natural gas production.

“And we have a solution in New England right there, which is natural gas from Pennsylvania,” Burgum said.

“Which would generate power five to 10 times more than all these five wind projects together.”

Burgum concluded by linking the administration’s energy approach to broader affordability goals for consumers.

“So we have a way to keep affordability into pricing for home heating and electricity in New England, just like we have in the rest of the country,” he said.

“Because President Trump’s policies are working.”

WATCH:


Scroll to Top