Author name: George Fitzpatrick

News

Trump Scores Major Win as Senate Confirms Over 100 Nominees During Shutdown

Senate Republicans voted Tuesday to confirm more than one hundred of President Donald Trump’s nominees as the government shutdown continued into another week, marking one of the largest single-day confirmation efforts of his presidency.

In a series of votes that followed party lines, lawmakers approved 107 nominees for various federal positions, significantly reducing the number of pending nominations awaiting action in the Senate.

The confirmations came as the chamber remained at an impasse over legislation to reopen the government, with floor time in recent weeks largely consumed by funding debates.

The newly confirmed group includes several of President Trump’s longtime allies, former political candidates, and senior advisors, as well as nominees to key diplomatic, regulatory, and prosecutorial roles.

Among the most high-profile confirmations was former Republican Senate candidate and NFL player Herschel Walker, who was confirmed as the U.S. Ambassador to the Bahamas.

Sergio Gor, a longtime political strategist and advisor to President Trump, was approved as the U.S. Ambassador to India.

The Senate also reappointed Paul Atkins, who currently serves as Chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission, to another term that extends through 2031.

Other confirmed nominees include senior administration officials and a series of U.S. attorneys and assistant secretaries across multiple agencies.

Tuesday’s vote followed a similar effort last month, when Senate Republicans confirmed 48 additional nominees.

That earlier batch included Kimberly Guilfoyle, who was appointed as U.S. Ambassador to Greece, and Callista Gingrich, who was confirmed as U.S. Ambassador to Switzerland.

The confirmations were made possible under a procedural change adopted by Senate Republicans last month.

The move, described as a “nuclear option” by lawmakers, altered Senate rules to allow a simple majority to confirm nominees, expediting approval of large groups at once.

Republicans said the rule change was necessary to address what they characterized as deliberate obstruction by Senate Democrats, led by Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York.

The Democratic caucus had blocked or delayed dozens of President Trump’s nominees for nearly nine months into his presidency, arguing that the Senate needed more time to vet candidates.

Traditionally, subcabinet-level nominees and others with bipartisan support are confirmed through unanimous consent or by voice vote, which streamlines the process and avoids extended floor debate.

However, Democrats had repeatedly declined to grant those procedural approvals, prompting Republicans to push through the rule change.

Under the new rules, the majority party may bring an unlimited number of nominees forward for confirmation in a single package.

Each nominee must still clear procedural hurdles, including committee approval and a final confirmation vote, but the overall process has become considerably faster.

Republican leaders said the change was intended to restore functionality to the Senate and ensure that critical government positions are filled during a period of continued policy gridlock.

Democrats criticized the move, claiming it weakened minority-party influence in the confirmation process.

Despite the ongoing government shutdown, which has limited legislative activity, Tuesday’s vote marked a significant victory for President Trump’s administration as it works to fill key federal roles.

The White House issued a statement praising the confirmations as “a vital step in advancing the President’s agenda and ensuring effective governance.”

With the latest confirmations, the total number of nominees approved during the current congressional session now exceeds 150, reflecting an accelerated pace of appointments under the revised Senate procedures.

News

White House Fires Back at Kamala Harris Over ‘Cackle’ and Vulgar Trump Remarks

The White House responded Tuesday to former Vice President Kamala Harris after she made vulgar remarks about members of President Donald Trump’s administration during a stop on her book tour in Los Angeles, referring to officials as “motherf**kers” and “crazy,” as reported by The New York Post.

Speaking Monday at the “A Day of Unreasonable Conversation” summit in Los Angeles, Harris claimed that the Trump administration is “trying to make people feel like they’ve lost their minds.” She added, “When in fact, these motherf**kers are crazy,” prompting loud cheers from the audience.

Following her comments, White House spokesperson Kush Desai fired back, referencing Harris’ well-known laugh that has been the subject of widespread criticism.

“Kamala Harris should listen to an audio recording of her cackle of a laugh before calling anyone crazy,” Desai said in a statement to TMZ when asked about her remarks.

Harris’ laughter has drawn ridicule for years, including during her failed 2024 presidential campaign. Critics often pointed to her distinctive laugh as a nervous response or a deflection tactic.

Vice President Kamala Harris greets the crowd in Jenison Field House on the Michigan State campus Sunday, Nov. 3, 2024.

During the 2024 presidential debate, Harris laughed off accusations from President Trump that she was aligned with Marxist ideology.

Her husband, former second gentleman Doug Emhoff, even referenced her laugh during his remarks at the 2024 Democratic National Convention, telling attendees that it was one of the things that drew him to her.

“She called me back and we talked for an hour. We laughed — you know that laugh! I love that laugh,” Emhoff said.

Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris is joined on stage by second gentleman Doug Emhoff after she delivered an acceptance speech during the final day of the Democratic National Convention at the United Center.

Harris is currently promoting her memoir, 107 Days, which details her short-lived presidential campaign. The Los Angeles appearance was one of several West Coast stops on her tour.

Her recent comments mark the second time in as many days that she used vulgar language to describe political opponents. Speaking at an event in San Francisco on Sunday, Harris criticized what she described as conservative “scapegoating” of the American public.

“Part of this moment requires us to also debunk some of this stuff they’re trying to sell the American people: to scapegoat, instead of owning up to the responsibility that the powerful have to have some level of concern and care, if not just basic f**king curiosity for the well-being of other people,” Harris said.

The White House’s response adds to the growing tension between Harris and the Trump administration since her departure from office.

Her remarks have drawn swift criticism from political observers, with many noting the contrast between her public image and the coarse language she used in front of a friendly audience.

Harris’ office has not yet issued a response to the White House’s comments or to requests for additional clarification about her remarks in Los Angeles or San Francisco.

News

Hakeem Jeffries Gets Confronted with His Own Words by NBC’s Kristen Welker

NBC host Kristen Welker pressed House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries on Sunday during “Meet the Press” over Democratic senators withholding votes to reopen the federal government and aired clips of Democrats speaking against shutdowns after he blamed Republicans.

After Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer led most Democrats to vote against the Republicans’ spending bill, the government shut down early Wednesday morning. In discussing who was responsible for the lapse in funding, Welker noted Republican senators need at least five more Democratic votes to pass the bill to reopen the government.

“But let me ask you, because you say this is a Republican shutdown, but it’s Democratic senators who are withholding their votes on what is called a clean resolution — that means no strings attached — which is something, quite frankly, Leader, that you and other Democrats have advocated for in the past,” Welker said.

Welker then played a montage featuring Democrats — including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and Jeffries — advocating for avoiding a shutdown and passing a clean continuing resolution.

The host followed up by asking why Democrats would not “fund the government and debate extending Obamacare tax credits after,” noting that the credits do not expire until the end of 2025.

“What we’ve called for is a bipartisan negotiation where Democrats and Republicans can sit down in good faith, reopen the government, pass a spending bill that actually improves the quality of life of the American people in an environment where the cost of living is already too high,” Jeffries responded.

“Republicans promised to lower costs on day one. Costs aren’t going down, they’re going up.”

“If these Affordable Care Act tax credits are allowed to expire, premiums and healthcare costs are going to skyrocket. America is already too expensive for the American people because of the Trump-failed policies, the Trump tariffs. This will make things worse,” Jeffries added.

“So we just want a bipartisan negotiation that addresses the healthcare crisis at the same period of time with the fierce urgency of now.”

The House passed the GOP-led spending bill late Tuesday evening.

With a shutdown looming hours away, the measure moved to the Senate, where it did not meet the 60-vote threshold.

The vote was 55–45, with three Democratic senators joining Republicans.

Since the shutdown began, Democrats have said Republicans failed to negotiate on concerns related to healthcare access.

Republicans countered that Democrats tried to attach policy demands, including proposals they say would extend benefits to illegal aliens, and argued Schumer is following the lead of progressives such as Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

The exchange on “Meet the Press” came against the backdrop of recent funding standoffs.

In March 2025, lawmakers avoided a shutdown when Schumer and nine other Senate Democrats joined Republicans to approve a GOP-led spending bill.

Schumer, then under pressure from his left flank, quickly drew criticism from progressives, including Ocasio-Cortez.

Ocasio-Cortez publicly called that move “a tremendous mistake.”

Speculation followed about whether she might consider challenging Schumer for his Senate seat in 2028.

Despite questions about Schumer’s posture in the latest impasse, Ocasio-Cortez has denied having any influence over the Senate minority leader.

As negotiations continue, the central dispute remains whether to pass a short-term “clean” continuing resolution or to link funding to policy provisions, including the timing of decisions on Affordable Care Act tax credits.

Jeffries has argued that any temporary measure should address healthcare costs at the same time, while Republican leaders have pushed for reopening the government first and debating policy riders separately.

The Senate’s failed vote keeps pressure on both chambers to find a path forward.

Republican leaders say a straightforward extension without additional conditions is necessary to restore federal operations.

Democratic leaders insist talks must include their healthcare priorities before reopening. No new Senate vote had been announced as of Sunday’s broadcast, and House leaders indicated they were waiting for the Senate to act.

Both parties encouraged agencies and constituents to monitor official updates for contingency guidance while negotiations continue.

Lawmakers in both chambers said they remain in contact over potential adjustments that could secure the additional votes needed to clear the 60-vote hurdle in the Senate.

News

CNN’s Van Jones Calls Out Democrats for Bungling Their Shutdown Strategy

CNN political commentator Van Jones criticized Democrats during an appearance on HBO’s Real Time Friday, saying the decision to allow a government shutdown was poorly timed and could damage the party politically.

Jones described the move as Democrats doing “the wrong thing at the wrong time for the right reason,” arguing that shutting down the federal government would have immediate negative consequences for federal workers and government services.

“I am going to maybe piss off some of my Democratic friends, but I think you can always trust our party to do the wrong thing at the wrong time for the right reason, okay,” Jones said.

“So, here’s the problem: Right now, if the Democrats don’t do anything and they pass this clean resolution, which they don’t want to do, if they did it, guess what would happen this month? Premiums would start going through the roof this month. By the time you get to the end of November, you would have Americans marching in the streets saying, I can’t pay 150% more for my insurance premiums, what the heck is going on?”

He continued, “Instead, we decided to not let that happen and shut the entire government down. So, now, people are going to be mad about the Post Office and a hundred other things that Republicans can then blame on us. So, I’m like, I get it, the base is upset, the base wants us to do something, please do something, do anything, but the something probably shouldn’t be throwing a bunch of people out of work in the federal government and crushing America’s government’s ability to function right before the pain was about to start. So, that’s my concern.”

Jones emphasized that he supported Democrats having leverage but believed the shutdown was not executed at the right time.

“I like the fact that we have this leverage, and I just want to use it at the right time,” he said.

The CNN commentator also recounted a recent conversation with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), pointing to what he viewed as inconsistency in the Democratic leadership’s stance on shutdowns.

“The weird thing is, I talked to Chuck Schumer about this like three months ago, and he was kicking me in the butt, because I had been tough on him for not allowing the government to shut down, and he convinced me that shutting the government down is stupid. Then I come on TV and he says, we’re now shutting the government down. I said, hold on a second, guys.”

Jones argued that Republicans were vulnerable over rising health care costs and that Democrats could have timed their strategy differently.

“So, look, my view is, the Republicans were about to let a bunch of Americans, 15 million Americans, step on a rake called their insurance premiums going through the roof. That’s when you shut the government down, but you do it before, and, now, it’s just going to be one more piece of garbage coming at the American people. I just think the timing’s not that great, but, look, maybe it’ll work.”

Jones’ remarks highlight divisions within the Democratic Party over how to approach the standoff and the broader political risks of a prolonged shutdown.

News

Karoline Leavitt Dismantles Reporter Trying to Push Schumer’s Shutdown Talking Point

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt clashed with a reporter Thursday during a press gaggle outside the White House, as she defended President Donald Trump’s position on the government shutdown and criticized Democrats for attempting to restore healthcare benefits for illegal aliens.

Leavitt said the shutdown occurred because Democrats refused to support a continuing resolution (CR) that did not include the restoration of taxpayer-funded benefits to non-citizens.

She argued that Democrats had previously supported similar stopgap funding measures more than a dozen times.

“Democrats have voted for the same CR Republicans introduced 13 times in the past… now all of a sudden they are shutting the government down and they are holding our country hostage over a partisan political matter [healthcare benefits to illegal aliens]… And we stopped it. The President [Donald Trump] stopped it with the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill,” Leavitt said.

“And now they want to undo the President’s very popular policy to ensure taxpayer-funded healthcare benefits only go to taxpaying, law-abiding American citizens.”

The exchange escalated when a reporter challenged her statement, claiming Democrats could not provide Medicaid to what he referred to as “undocumented immigrants” because it was already prohibited under existing law.

Leavitt countered directly. “Let me ask you, do you think that illegal aliens should receive Medicaid benefits? Medicaid benefits that go to the most vulnerable people in our society.”

As the reporter attempted to redirect the discussion, Leavitt continued.

“Medicaid benefits that were designed to help low-income families and Americans in our country. So what the Biden’s administration did is they allowed tens of millions of illegal aliens from all over the world to come into our country.”

She said the prior administration used parole programs to admit large numbers of migrants and then extended temporary protective status, which in turn allowed them to access government services.

“It was a complete abuse of our immigration system. They slapped a Band-Aid on these illegals. They called it temporary protective status. And then they allowed those illegals from all over the world to get free benefits,” Leavitt said.

She added that Americans struggling under inflation and long wait times in hospitals were being forced to compete with non-citizens for services.

“You know who would like free benefits? Hard-working Americans who work their butts off every day, who are living paycheck to paycheck,” she said.

“Because of the Biden-induced inflation crisis. And there were higher wait times in hospitals under the Biden administration. We saw these illegals committing crimes all over our country. And they’re getting things for free. That is fundamentally unfair. And this administration is not going to do it.”

Leavitt placed full responsibility for the shutdown on Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), saying Democrats insisted on adding taxpayer-funded benefits for illegal aliens to the funding proposal.

“This White House is showing no weakness when it comes to their messaging on the shutdown, putting the blame squarely on the Democrats and Senator Chuck Schumer,” she said.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) backed up the White House’s position, pointing to the Democrats’ legislative text.

“This isn’t a Republican talking point, or political spin… It’s what Democrats put IN WRITING: On page 57, section 2141, of their OWN bill, Democrats restore taxpayer-funded benefits for illegal immigrants,” Johnson wrote on X.

Johnson encouraged the public to review the bill for themselves, saying the evidence was clear.

The exchange marked the latest development in the political standoff over government funding, as both chambers continue negotiations to end what Republicans have labeled the “Schumer Shutdown.”

News

Shocking New Move in Caribbean Sends a Message the World Cannot Ignore

President Donald Trump has once again shown that he is not afraid to make bold decisions in defense of the American people.

In a decisive move, Trump has declared that drug cartels operating in the Caribbean are unlawful combatants.

According to a Trump administration memo obtained by The Associated Press, the United States is now engaged in what the president described as a “non-international armed conflict” following a series of recent strikes against smuggling boats.

This marks a powerful escalation in the fight against the cartels and signals that the administration will stop at nothing to secure America’s borders and communities.

A source familiar with the matter, who was not authorized to comment publicly, explained that Congress was formally notified of the designation by Pentagon officials on Wednesday.

This development comes directly after the U.S. military successfully carried out three strikes last month on vessels alleged to be drug smuggling operations.

At least two of those boats had originated from Venezuela, a country that has long been tied to organized crime and narcotics flowing into the United States.

While Pentagon officials did not release a complete list of the terrorist organizations at the heart of this conflict, the administration’s actions have already frustrated some lawmakers.

According to individuals briefed on the matter, certain members of Congress expressed concern that the administration was pursuing a legal framework they believe should require more direct legislative involvement.

Nevertheless, the White House has made clear that these steps are necessary to address a threat that cannot be tolerated. Drug cartels are not simply organized crime rings.

They are heavily armed, violent, and transnational actors who destabilize entire regions. Because of this reality, treating them as unlawful combatants is not only justified but absolutely critical to stopping their deadly operations.

Democrats in particular have been pushing for Trump to seek formal war powers authorization from Congress for such operations. Yet, as has often been the case, their objections appear to place partisan politics above national security.

The classified briefing that outlined the administration’s strategy was met with stark objections from both Democrats and a handful of Republicans, but their resistance underscores how disconnected Washington insiders often are from the real danger posed by narcotics flowing across America’s borders.

Lawmakers who oppose Trump’s actions argue that the use of the military in this way raises questions about executive authority. However, the president has made it clear that extraordinary threats require extraordinary measures.

The administration’s actions are not simply about law enforcement but about protecting the lives of American citizens who are directly endangered by cartel operations.

The first of these operations took place on September 2, when U.S. forces struck what was identified as a drug-carrying speedboat. That strike killed 11 people and was tied to the notorious Tren de Aragua gang.

This gang, which the U.S. designated earlier this year as a foreign terrorist organization, represents exactly the kind of violent and destructive threat that the administration has vowed to eradicate.

By holding groups like this accountable, Trump is drawing a firm line that many previous administrations failed to enforce.

Critics, including human rights groups, argue that Trump’s actions represent an overreach of executive authority and accuse him of using the military for law enforcement purposes.

Yet these criticisms fail to acknowledge the magnitude of the crisis. Every cartel shipment that reaches America contributes to the opioid epidemic, violent crime, and the destruction of families.

Therefore, it is not only a matter of policy but a matter of national survival to confront these organizations with the full power of the U.S. military.

By framing the battle against drug cartels as part of an armed conflict, Trump is claiming the kind of wartime powers that allow the United States to move swiftly and decisively.

For the first time in decades, Washington is treating cartel violence not as a policing issue but as the full-scale threat that it is.

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has played a key role in ensuring that the Pentagon supports this strategy. His leadership has demonstrated a willingness to cut through bureaucratic hesitation and align the military with the president’s bold vision.

Because of this decisive action, the United States is no longer playing defense. It is taking the fight to the cartels before they can poison more communities and destabilize more regions.

At the same time, this campaign sends a clear message to hostile regimes that may think of aligning with these criminal organizations: the United States will treat such actions as acts of war.

The critics may continue to question legality or political process, but the American people understand the bigger picture. This is about defending the nation from a clear and present danger.

Trump and Hegseth have shown that they will not back down from that responsibility, no matter how loudly the opposition shouts.

History will likely remember this moment as the time when America finally chose to confront the drug cartels with the seriousness they deserve.

Because of strong leadership, the United States is no longer waiting for the next wave of drugs to spill across its borders. Instead, it is striking first, striking hard, and striking in the name of freedom, safety, and sovereignty.

News

Trump Administration Declares Armed Conflict With Cartels After Boat Strikes: ‘We Will Blow You Out of the Water’

The Trump administration has formally notified Congress that the United States is engaged in a “non-international armed conflict” with drug cartels following a series of military strikes on smuggling operations in the Caribbean, as reported by the New York Post.

According to a Pentagon notice sent Wednesday to congressional committees, the determination comes after “hostile acts” directed at American citizens and U.S. allies.

The notice, reported by The New York Times and the Associated Press, characterized the groups as “nonstate armed groups” and “unlawful combatants” engaged in attacks against the United States.

President Trump highlighted the operations during a speech Monday at Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia, where he referenced the destruction of four Venezuelan boats allegedly used for drug smuggling.

“If you try to poison our people, we will blow you out of existence,” Trump said. “That’s the only language they really understand. That’s why you don’t see any more boats on the ocean.”

The strikes, conducted earlier this month, targeted vessels linked to cocaine and fentanyl trafficking. The first attack on September 2 focused on a Venezuelan prison gang accused of drug smuggling. Officials confirmed that at least 17 people were killed in the initial three strikes.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that nearly 100,000 Americans die annually from drug overdoses. In 2024 alone, at least 70,000 fatalities were attributed to cocaine or synthetic opioids such as fentanyl.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) voiced support for the military action during a recent Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. “We’re blowing boats out of the water in the Caribbean because they’re connected to international narco-terrorist groups,” Graham said.

He also suggested Venezuela could qualify as a state sponsor of terrorism under U.S. law.

FBI Director Kash Patel, questioned during the hearing on the administration’s legal authority to strike the boats, deferred to the Pentagon. “We will provide the intelligence necessary for anyone who meets the threshold to be a state sponsor of terror,” Patel said.

National Harbor, MD US – Mar 3, 2023: Kash Patel, former Pentagon Chief of Staff at the 2023 Conservative Action Conference (CPAC). Credit: Ron Sachs – CNP

The State Department has already labeled several organizations, including Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua prison gang, as foreign terrorist organizations.

The Pentagon notice to lawmakers cited intelligence assessments that one of the targeted vessels was “affiliated with a designated terrorist organization” and was actively trafficking drugs “which could ultimately be used to kill Americans.”

The notice stated that the strike destroyed the vessel, its illicit cargo, and killed approximately three individuals classified as unlawful combatants.

It added: “Based upon the cumulative effects of these hostile acts against the citizens and interests of the United States and friendly foreign nations, the president determined that the United States is in a non-international armed conflict with these designated terrorist organizations.”

While Congress has not formally declared war since World War II, the U.S. has engaged in numerous conflicts abroad without a formal declaration. Lawmakers have not yet taken legislative action in response to the administration’s notice.

News

Woman Loses It Over $1 Sauce Fee, Accused of Causing $1,000 Damage at Little Caesars

A Kentucky woman is facing criminal charges after police say she caused more than $1,000 in damage at a Little Caesars restaurant when told she would need to pay $1 for extra sauce, as reported by The Blaze.

According to court documents cited by WDRB-TV, Breanna Haynes placed a phone order with the Little Caesars location and went to pick it up earlier this year.

While at the store, Haynes requested extra sauce. When an employee informed her there would be an additional $1 charge, police said Haynes “created a disturbance in the store.”

Authorities reported that Haynes knocked items off the counter, including a custom-made computer stand and the store’s register system. The total cost of damages exceeded $1,000.

Surveillance footage was reviewed by Louisville police, who matched the suspect to a known photo, allowing employees to confirm her identity.

Haynes was charged with criminal mischief in connection with the January incident. She was not arrested until late September.

Court records show that Haynes was also accused of a separate act of vandalism on September 22. Police said she allegedly threw a brick at a vehicle belonging to the father of her child during a dispute over his desire to move back to Cincinnati.

That incident reportedly caused another $1,000 in damages. She was subsequently charged with both assault and criminal mischief in that case as well.

The incidents have drawn widespread public reaction. On Facebook, commenters expressed disbelief that the initial confrontation began over a $1 sauce charge.

“That must be some good sauce!” one commenter wrote. Another added, “I guess she’d rather pay $1,000 plus lawyers instead of just giving up the dollar. Smh, wish I had that kind of money.”

Other commenters were critical of Haynes’ behavior. “Stay home if you don’t know how to behave in public,” one person advised.

Another remarked, “Can’t afford a buck for sauce? Maybe you shouldn’t be buying pizza then.”

Haynes is scheduled to appear in court on the charges. The Louisville Metro Police Department has not released further details on the pending cases.

News

Obama Cries On X About Jimmy Kimmel’s Suspension for Spreading Hateful Misinformation

Former President Barack Obama criticized the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel Live! following backlash over Kimmel’s comments about the assassination of Turning Point USA co-founder Charlie Kirk.

Obama accused the current administration of engaging in censorship through regulatory threats.

“After years of complaining about cancel culture, the current administration has taken it to a new and dangerous level by routinely threatening regulatory action against media companies unless they muzzle or fire reporters and commentators it doesn’t like,” Obama wrote on X while sharing an article on the suspension.

“This is precisely the kind of government coercion that the First Amendment was designed to prevent — and media companies need to start standing up rather than capitulating to it.”

The controversy began with Kimmel’s Monday night monologue, in which he claimed conservatives were mischaracterizing the suspect in Kirk’s killing.

“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it,” Kimmel said.

Investigators, however, and the family of the suspect, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, indicated Robinson held left-leaning views and had been living with a transgender roommate described by relatives as someone who “hates conservatives and Christians.”

Robinson was identified as the alleged gunman in Kirk’s public killing last week at Utah Valley University.

Kimmel did not issue an on-air apology for his remarks.

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr condemned Kimmel’s assertions, calling them “truly sick.”

Carr warned ABC and parent company Disney that misleading commentary of that nature could lead to regulatory review, including action against their broadcast license.

Andrew Alford, president of Nexstar Media Group, which owns dozens of ABC affiliates, also criticized the monologue.

He described Kimmel’s remarks as “offensive and insensitive at a critical time in our national political discourse” and said Nexstar stations would not air the program until “cooler heads prevail.”

ABC later announced that Jimmy Kimmel Live! had been suspended “indefinitely.”

The network has not provided details on when or if the program might return, leaving Kimmel’s future uncertain. His current contract runs through May 2026.

President Donald Trump welcomed the decision in a post on Truth Social.

“Great News for America: The ratings challenged Jimmy Kimmel Show is CANCELLED. Congratulations to ABC for finally having the courage to do what had to be done,” Trump wrote.

He added, “Kimmel has ZERO talent, and worse ratings than even Colbert, if that’s possible. That leaves Jimmy and Seth, two total losers, on Fake News NBC. Their ratings are also horrible. Do it NBC!!! President DJT.”

Donald Trump Jr. also weighed in, countering arguments from critics who called the suspension censorship.

He wrote that left-leaning media figures were now experiencing “consequence culture,” noting that inflammatory rhetoric has real-world effects.

The dispute over Kimmel’s remarks comes amid an ongoing debate about the role of late-night television and the boundaries of political commentary, especially following Kirk’s assassination.

For now, ABC’s suspension of Kimmel has amplified both regulatory scrutiny and partisan divisions over media responsibility.

News

54 Smoking Guns Trump Can Use to Go After George Soros’ Network on RICO Charges

On The Charlie Kirk Show, Glenn Beck and Ryan Mauro outlined findings they say tie George Soros’s Open Society Foundations to U.S. organizations accused of supporting extremist activity.

Mauro detailed the research he conducted with the Capitol Research Center, pointing to tens of millions of dollars in grants as evidence.

“According to George Soros own files from his Open Society Foundations,” Mauro said, “so myself, my colleagues at Capitol Research Center, basically went through as many grants of his as many funding streams as we could find.”

“And here’s the smoking guns that we believe that President Trump, if he’s informed of it, can use to go after Soros, network of hate in various ways,” Mauro continued.

“We traced over $80 million going from the Open Society Foundations to at least 54 groups engaged in crime and domestic terrorism on US soil or that are pro terrorism.”

He added, “They were endorsing things like the October 7 attacks, or are associated with foreign terrorist organizations or explicitly pro terror groups. And this is according to his own file, so it’s rock solid.”

Mauro said part of the funding was tied to groups that, in his words, meet the FBI’s definition of domestic terrorism.

“Overall, that amount over 23 million, went to at least seven groups that are doing things that meet the FBI definition of domestic terrorism, rioting and things like that,” he stated.

Beck pressed Mauro for more information. “Can you be more specific than this?” Beck asked.

Mauro responded by naming one of the organizations. “Absolutely, I’m happy to so the Center for third world organizing, for example, is an organization that has a hub that fuse together several really extreme organizations.”

“We found $400,000 going to them,” he said.

“And they openly boast of the fact that they threw down during the uprisings in Minnesota, obviously referring to the rioting and boasting of how many 1000s of people they helped train.”

Mauro explained that some of the groups create materials that appear innocent on the surface but contain links to violent guidance.

“A lot of these groups have created what they’ll call like a protest guide or an activism tool kit. And it sounds innocuous. Then you open it up, and you’ll see support for Hamas in it.”

He added, “But then they’ll sometimes slyly say, for more information, go to these hyperlinks, and you go to the hyperlinks, and there’ll be guides recommending things like property, destruction, violence, false IDs, how to obstruct justice, all of these things.”

“And they know darn well what they’re doing. They don’t put that there by accident,” Mauro said.

He continued, “Some of the more careful ones will just direct their readership to anarchist websites with all that material, knowing that they’ll see it when it’s there.”

Mauro also emphasized the broader reach of these groups.

“Some of these groups are coalitions,” he said.

“So when I say 54 groups, just one of those might have 300 entities in that one. So it’s actually the real number is actually much higher.”

The discussion centered on the scale of Soros’s reported funding and the potential implications if authorities confirm the links.

The Heir – Inside the (Not So) Secret Network of Alex Soros

Mauro and Beck argued that the evidence warrants further investigation by federal officials, particularly in light of the groups’ own published materials.


Scroll to Top