Author name: Don Palladino

News

James Comey Releases Bizarre Video, Says Taylor Swift Helps Him Cope with Donald Trump

Former FBI Director James Comey released a video on Sunday that quickly went viral, in which he praised singer Taylor Swift as a source of family inspiration and personal guidance while taking repeated shots at President Donald Trump.

Comey, who led the FBI until his dismissal in 2017, began the video by criticizing Trump, accusing him of humiliating the United States alongside Russian President Vladimir Putin. He described the experience as “a bad dream you can’t wake up from.”

The former FBI director then shifted to discussing his admiration for Taylor Swift, revealing that he has attended two of her concerts and even assisted relatives in purchasing tickets.

He said Swift’s music has been central to his family’s life for years.

“I’m in a family’s Switie group chat. I know all her music and I listen to it in my headphones when I cut the grass,” Comey said.

He added that his favorites include the 10-minute version of “All Too Well” and “Exile,” her duet with Bon Iver.

“Taylor Swift has grown up with my family and provided us a soundtrack, really, as we’ve grown ourselves and learned and adapted and dealt with adversity and celebration,” Comey said, noting that millions of families may feel the same way.

Comey explained that Swift’s career has offered lessons at every stage, which resonated with his children and also with him as a parent.

He said that Swift’s example continues to guide him as an adult.

One of the ways her influence shapes his outlook, Comey said, is in how to deal with bullies.

He noted that while mocking posts about Trump can be amusing, he is uneasy with them.

“But I gotta be honest, it also leaves me with a strange feeling at times, because I don’t want us to become like Trump and his followers,” Comey said.

“There are far more decent, honest, kind people in America than there are mean jerks. And don’t get me wrong, we have our jerks, millions of them.”

He went on to accuse Republicans of exhibiting “stunning coarseness,” while arguing that it reflects a minority attitude in the country.

“I am not an advocate for weakness. Of course, we need to stand up to jerks and defend what matters, but I think we have to try to do that without becoming like them, which is what makes me think about Taylor Swift,” Comey said.

“She’s made clear that she sees Donald Trump for what he is. Last year, she urged Americans not to make the serious mistake of electing him.”

Comey continued by claiming, “Of course, we’re now living with the consequences of that mistake. But while our elderly makeup-covered president is posting about whether Taylor Swift is still hot and declaring that he can’t stand her, what’s she doing? Living her best life, producing great music and, as she urged all of us to do during the podcast, not giving the jerks power over her mind.”

He cited Swift’s advice to treat personal energy “like a luxury item” and pointed to research suggesting that rudeness can make people less happy.

“We can’t stop people from being jerks. What we can do is stop it from hurting us, from changing us,” he added.

Comey also recalled attending a Swift concert in Hartford, Connecticut, 14 years ago.

He recited lyrics from her song “Mean,” highlighting the line, “why you gotta be so mean.”

“I bet you got pushed around. Somebody made you cold. But the cycle ends right now, because you can’t leave me down that road,” Comey said, repeating the lyrics.

“You’ll be glad I didn’t sing that. That’s right, because down that road of unhappiness, nobody should have that power over us.”

The video prompted widespread reaction online.

One user described it as “the creepiest video in the history of social media,” while another remarked, “It’s truly mind-blowing this man served as FBI director.”

News

Bill Clinton Named as “Prime Suspect” In High-Stakes Epstein Investigation

House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) identified former President Bill Clinton as a “prime suspect” in the panel’s ongoing investigation into the late financier Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking case.

Comer made the statement Monday in an interview with Newsmax, pointing to longstanding reports linking Clinton to visits to Epstein’s private island.

“Everybody in America wants to know what went on in Epstein Island, and we’ve all heard reports that Bill Clinton was a frequent visitor there, so he’s a prime suspect to be deposed by the House Oversight Committee,” Comer said.

His office later confirmed the remarks to Fox News Digital.

On August 5, the Oversight Committee issued a series of deposition subpoenas to individuals with connections to Epstein, including both Bill and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Lawmakers from both parties voted to authorize the subpoenas, with the committee requesting Hillary Clinton appear on October 9 and Bill Clinton on October 14.

“So, hopefully we’ll win that court battle with that subpoena and see President Clinton in October,” Comer told Newsmax.

Bill Clinton has repeatedly denied visiting Epstein’s island. In his 2024 memoir Citizen, Clinton wrote that he had never traveled there and expressed regret over ever meeting Epstein.

A spokesperson for Clinton did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

The Oversight Committee’s actions come amid renewed public attention on the Epstein case.

In July, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI announced they would not release new records related to the matter and that their review into Epstein was closed.

The agencies stated that no new individuals had been identified for prosecution and that they had not compiled a list of sexual predators connected to Epstein.

That position contrasts with the committee’s ongoing inquiry, which seeks to obtain all Justice Department records concerning Epstein.

Alongside the Clintons, the Oversight Committee issued subpoenas to former FBI Director James Comey, former Attorneys General Eric Holder, Jeff Sessions, and Merrick Garland, among others.

The DOJ faces a Tuesday deadline to provide the requested documents, according to previous reports by Fox News Digital.

Comer acknowledged that compelling the former president to testify will present challenges, but expressed confidence based on his past success in enforcing subpoenas.

“I’ve never lost a subpoena battle,” Comer said Monday.

“I’ve been chairman of that committee for a year and a half — this is the most challenging subpoena I’ve ever issued, but what makes this subpoena different is that the Democrats voted with Republicans.”

The committee’s investigation is focused on uncovering the full scope of Epstein’s activities and the extent of any political or high-profile connections.

Lawmakers have signaled that testimony from key figures, along with access to DOJ records, will be central to determining whether further action is warranted.

News

California Bill to End the Epidemic of Trans-Identifying Male Rapists in Female Prisons Shot Down by Democrats

On April 29, 2025, the California legislature shot down a bill prohibiting trans-identifying men with a history of sexual violence from being housed in women’s correctional facilities. 

The Golden State allows prisoners to be incarcerated in correctional facilities matching their preferred gender identity after passing the Transgender Respect, Agency, and Dignity Act, or SB132, in 2021. Other states with similar laws are Maine, New York, Minnesota, New Jersey, and Washington.  

However, safety concerns for biological women have persisted, prompting state Sen. Shannon Grove to introduce SB311. If it passed, the law would’ve required the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to provide a secure facility to house transgender-identifying men in women’s prisons to protect the security needs of biological women.

Additionally, it would’ve ban biological men who identify as women and are registered sex offenders from being housed in women’s facilities.

“Any inmate convicted of an offense for which they are required to register pursuant to Section 290, except for biological women at birth, shall be ineligible for housing at a women’s prison.”

Currently, California law requires the CDCR to consider each transgender inmate’s request for transfer to a female facility. Such transfer requests do not consider the inmate’s sexual violence history, whether they have intact male genitalia, or have undergone gender transition procedures. 

About 898 transgender-identifying men have requested to be transferred to women’s facilities, of which 45 have been effected, while 208 are still pending.

Meanwhile, the CDCR is aware of potential intimate relations between transgender-identifying male prisoners and their biological counterparts and distributes condoms in prison.

Similarly, it is aware that biological female inmates are afraid of potential sexual violence from transgender-identifying male counterparts. Physical violence and other forms of degrading and demeaning attacks on biological female inmates by transgender inmates have been widely reported.

Over one quarter of inmates have experienced such incidents, including sexual assaults by biological male inmates who identify as women, while two-thirds are afraid for their safety. 

Several high-profile cases of sexual assault by trans-identifying individuals have been reported in California and other states. 

In 2024, Tremaine Carroll, a six-foot-tall biological man who identifies as a woman was accused of raping two inmates one of whom became pregnant and also attempting to intimidate a witness to stop them from testifying. Carroll had been transferred to the Central California Women’s Facility (CCWF) in Chowchilla in 2021 when SB132 became law. 

Ironically, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) used him as proof that trans-identifying men were not a threat to the safety of biological female inmates. While the case is still ongoing, he was eventually transferred to the Salinas Valley State Prison male facility under California’s Three Strikes Law.

Female inmate Krystal Gonzalez, who was sexually trafficked at 13, was also allegedly repeatedly raped by a transgender detainee and reportedly faced a disciplinary action when she reported the incident. 

Seemingly, SB311 could fail to pass as California Democrats prioritize the convenience of transgender individuals over the safety of biological women. 

Trans

Military Goes Woke Again: Pentagon Resumes Taxpayer-Funded Transgender Care for Servicemembers

The Pentagon will resume sex change treatments for transgender servicemembers or their trans-identifying dependents. Services to resume include gender dysphoria diagnosis, hormone therapy, surgical procedures, and mental health care and counseling. 

In a new memo dated April 21 seen by Politico, the Pentagon’s acting assistant secretary of Defense for health affairs, Dr. Stephen Ferrara, announced the return of the radical policy.

“Service members and all other covered beneficiaries 19 years of age or older may receive appropriate care for their diagnosis of [gender dysphoria], including mental health care and counseling and newly initiated or ongoing cross-sex hormone therapy,” it reads.

So-called “Gender affirming” procedures and care halted after Trump signed the “Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness” Executive Order 14183. It required the Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to update the Medical Standards for Military Service  within sixty days. 

Among other things, it required the Secretary of Defense to “promptly issue directives for DoD to end invented and identification-based pronoun usage” in the military.

It also declared “medical, surgical, and mental health constraints on individuals with gender dysphoria” as “inconsistent” with the “high standards for troop readiness, lethality, cohesion, honesty, humility, uniformity, and integrity.”

On February 7, 2025, Hegseth issued a memo directing the Pentagon to halt the recruitment of servicemembers suffering from gender dysphoria and pause gender affirming care in line with Trump’s executive orders.

“Effective immediately, all new accessions for individuals with a history of gender dysphoria are paused, and all unscheduled, scheduled, or planned medical procedures associated with affirming or facilitating a gender transition for Service members are paused,” the memo stated.

However, on March 18, 2025, the first openly gay, Uruguayan-born U.S. district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Ana Reyes, blocked Hegseth’s decision, terming it unconstitutional. The Biden appointee also issued an order for the Pentagon to “take all steps necessary to effectuate” her order, including restoring gender-affirming care for transgender servicemembers.

Similarly, U.S. District Judge Benjamin Settle also issued a nationwide injunction lifting the ban on transgender service members joining the military and restored gender-affirming care, essentially reinstating the Biden-era policy across the military. 

Settle argued that Trump’s executive order likely violates the U.S. Constitution’s Fifth Amendment right to equal protection under the law. He also ruled that the Trump administration failed to prove that gender dysphoria affects cohesion within the military.

“The government falls well short of its burden to show that banning transgender service is substantially related to achieving unit cohesion, good order, or discipline,” Judge Settle wrote.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration has appealed the rulings and asked the Supreme Court to enforce its transgender policy. Trump argues that the nationwide injunction oversteps the issuing court’s judicial authority. 

Subsequently, the resumption of gender-affirming care for transgender servicemembers will likely be temporary, as the Supreme Court could uphold Trump’s ban given its long-established deference to the military.

“Nevertheless, so long as the Court follows its long history of showing extreme deference to the military, it seems exceedingly likely that the Trump administration will prevail in this case,” wrote Vox’s senior legal correspondent Ian Millhiser.

Border

Border Czar Tom Homan Will “Seek Prosecution” after NJ Gov. Murphy Admitted Harboring an Illegal Alien

Trump’s Border Czar Tom Homan has reacted swiftly to New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy (D) admitting that he and NJ’s first lady Tammy were harboring an illegal alien. In a rather “foolish” show of defiance, the governor of the Garden State also suggested that the undocumented individual was beyond the reach of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency. Gov. Murphy made the damning confession while talking to a Leftwing organization Blue Wave New Jersey.

“Tammy and I were talking about – I don’t want to get into too much detail – but there is someone in our broader universe whose immigration status is not yet at the point that they are trying to get it to,” Murphy confessed.

“And we said, ‘You know what? Let’s have her live at our house above our garage’ and good luck to the feds coming in to try to get her.”

Homan had warned Americans, including politicians like the Chicago Mayor, against harboring illegal aliens, which is a federal crime under Title 8 of the United States Code 1324 III. He also told the “not very smart” Boston Mayor Michelle Wu to “get the hell out of the way” after she vowed not to cooperate with Trump’s deportations.

However, Gov. Murphy has upped the stakes by being the most-ranking politician to confess to harboring an illegal alien despite Homan’s repeated warnings.

“I think the governor is pretty foolish,” Homan said. 

“I got note of it. Won’t let it go. We’ll look into it,” he continued.

“And if he’s knowingly harboring and concealing an illegal alien, that’s a violation of Title VIII of the United States Code 1324.”

“I would seek prosecution, or the secretary will seek prosecution,” Homan warned. “Maybe he’s bluffing. If not, we’ll deal with that.”

Homan also disclosed that the Trump administration would sue sanctuary cities for harboring illegal aliens, who he said are responsible for killing thousands of children. 

Homan also noted that the illegal immigrant killer of Laken Riley was comfortably living in the New York City sanctuary beyond the reach of the feds despite facing child endangerment charges. José Antonio Ibarra also had an active arrest warrant after skipping court hearings related to an alleged Walmart theft in Athens, Georgia.

Gov. Murphy should learn from Denver Mayor Mike Johnston, who quickly retracted his statement that he was willing to go to jail for fighting Trump’s deportations. 

“Me and the Denver mayor agree on one thing,” Homan said. “He’s willing to go to jail. I’m willing to put him in jail.”

If Gov. Murphy is bluffing, he might earn street cred for being the tough guy who challenged Homan without risking his freedom, which is likely what he is doing. However, the thought of incarcerating a senior Democrat over illegal immigration would be very satisfying to most Americans who love their country.

Meanwhile, Gov. Murphy’s confession came at a critical moment when Homan said he would step up deportations and target other categories of illegal aliens besides national security threats. Appearing on ABC News, he warned that anybody in the country illegally was not exempt from deportation. 

“If you’re in the country illegally, you’re on the table.”

Race, Woke

FAA Sued for Turning Down Qualified Air Traffic Controllers for Being “Too White”

Hot on the heels of the recent D.C plane crash, a lawsuit alleging that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) turned down qualified air traffic controllers because they were “too white” has resurfaced. 

Nearly 1,000  air traffic control applicants were allegedly affected by the diversity, equality, and inclusion (DEI) hiring practice. The lawsuit, which traces its origins to the Obama administration, resurfaced after the deadly crash that has so far killed over five dozen people.

Andrew Brigida, represented by the Mountain States Legal Foundation (MSLF), is among over 900 applicants who scored 100% on the air traffic controller test but were allegedly turned down because they did not check all the diversity checkboxes.

The plaintiff had graduated from Arizona State University in partnership with the FAA via a program used to select the most qualified controllers. After acing the test, he was subsequently placed on a preferred candidate list before being turned down after the FAA changed the hiring rules. 

According to the lawsuit, the FAA changed the hiring process to include a biographical assessment questionnaire, turning down hundreds of qualified applicants before they even showed up. William Perry Pendley, MSFL’s president handling the case, his client received an email stating that the FAA was “implementing changes to improve and streamline” the hiring process and that his application had been impacted.

The assessment not only discriminated on race but also awarded extra points to applicants who performed poorly in maths.

“Nevermind how insulting it was that the government was concluding that this is a way to pool up African Americans into the air traffic control ranks, but that’s all there,” said former Nevada Attorney General Adam Laxalt. “They did change the test to change the applicant pool.”

In 2018, the FAA dropped the biographical assessment tool after Congress voted against it, requiring applicants to pass the Air Traffic Skills Assessment (ATSA) to demonstrate competence. 

Regarding the D.C. plane tragedy, MSFL’s president told the British newspaper, the Daily Telegraph, that “DEI hiring policies have no place in America, especially in safety-critical industries, yet they have shaped the FAA’s hiring decisions for years.

“Last night’s accident is a sobering reminder of the cost of placing ideology over expertise. How many more tragedies must occur before we return to common sense? It’s time to demand accountability, end DEI hiring in aviation, and restore safety as the top priority in our airways.”

However, the FAA contests the lawsuit. It says there was a skill shortage for air traffic controllers and that it was doing its best to ensure no talent was left out.

“There is a well-known national shortage of air traffic controllers, and the FAA has ramped up outreach to ensure no talent is left on the table.”

However, turning down 900 applicants who aced the test does not particularly suggest a talent shortage. Perhaps, there is a talent shortage for individuals who meet a certain demographic criteria.

Vowing to “restore faith in American air travel,” President Trump blamed Biden for lowering standards to the lowest level, resulting in people with “severe intellectual and psychiatric disabilities” being hired to achieve DEI objectives.

“I put safety first,” Trump said, adding that “Obama, Biden, and the Democrats put policy first, and they put politics at a level that nobody’s ever seen, because this was the lowest level, their policy was horrible, and their politics was even worse.”

According to its website, the agency specifically targeted people with “targeted disabilities” during its hiring process.

“Targeted disabilities are those disabilities that the federal government, as a matter of policy, has identified for special emphasis in recruitment and hiring,” the website reads.

Further worsening the hiring crisis before the accident, the New York Times reported that staffing was not “normal for the time of day and volume of traffic.” One air traffic controller had left their post at the time of the accident, leaving one employee to handle both the passenger airplane and the helicopter, a job that would ordinarily require two people.

Trump has ordered a “systematic and comprehensive investigation” to establish the cause of the accident.

News

7 Election-Stealing Events to Watch for Before November

Democrats seem poised to do whatever it takes to stay in the White House. That alone wouldn’t worry me so much, but they’re not the only ones with skin in the game. Corporate media, most in Big Tech, and foreign influences also seem willing to lie, cheat, and steal to prevent a second term for Donald Trump.

But what if it’s just not enough? What if massive, widespread voter fraud using their 2020 tricks combined with the border invasion of imported Democrats just won’t do the trick? They’ll know. Their internal polling is exponentially better than the public polls. We saw the results of that in 2016 when all of the public polls showed Hillary Clinton winning, yet she inexplicably cancelled her million dollar fireworks celebration days before the election. She knew. They all knew. It was the rest of us who got to watch events unfold on Election Night. They knew the outcome in advance.

This is why I’m very concerned of more acute actions being taken between now and Election Day. When the UniParty Swamp, corporate media, Big Tech, and foreign influencers are not able to carry Kamala Harris and Tim Walz over the finish line, they’ll turn to their version of “higher powers,” and I don’t mean they’re going to pray. They’ll call in the big guns in the Deep State (DS) and the Globalist Elite Cabal (GEC). They may have done so already.

When the big guns come in, they subvert the will of the people through catastrophes. We saw that in 2020. Do you think the DNC launched the plandemic? Was CNN unleashing an alleged coronavirus? Did Zuckerbucks get laundered to Wuhan? No. The Deep State and the Globalist Elite Cabal (which some believe are one in the same) weren’t going to take their chances with standard voter fraud. They needed an event to justify measures that could cover up unprecedented levels of election chicanery and Covid delivered.

Will they do the same thing in 2024? Perhaps. Monkeypox seems to be getting far more attention than it deserves. But given the time remaining and the lack of spread thus far, I’m putting another plandemic as the fourth most likely event that could give them just enough turmoil to rig another election.

Below are the seven most likely events that the DS/GEC will unleash between now and Election Day if they believe regular cheating won’t be enough. I’ve put them in reverse order of likeliness. Leave a comment below to add to or adjust the list as you see it. I’ll be talking about this during my show at noon Pacific.

War

Some would say this is the most likely scenario given the events unfolding overseas. I consider this the least likely to happen before the election, though I do believe we will be pushed into a war at some point shortly thereafter. Whether it’s in the Middle East, Taiwan/Philippines, Eastern Europe, or more than one, I think it’s clear that war is in our future.

And to be clear, I’m not saying that we won’t get involved in a conflict between now and the election. I’m saying we are less likely to be in a full-fledged war that would allow them to subvert or delay the election. They have bigger plans for us with war, and those plans will probably happen after the election.

Economic Collapse

The sad reality about our economy is that it actually collapsed months (years?) ago. We just haven’t seen the direct results of it but considering we’re at a point where the national debt can no longer be reversed it’s abundantly clear that the rest of the world is looking for an alternative to the U.S. Dollar.

Once that alternative presents itself, likely in the form of widespread adoption of Central Bank Digital Currencies, then the collapse that has already happened will manifest in real world events. It will happen suddenly; one day everything is okay and then events will unfold over the course of weeks if not days and chaos will ensue.

But just as with the war scenario, I believe this catastrophe is being saved for events in the near future, just not before the election.

Terrorist Attack

Now we’re starting to get into more likely scenarios. The border invasion has allowed an unknown but large number of terrorists into the nation. That’s common knowledge. What’s less known is that many, particularly those from China, have completely disappeared. Many are not staying at migrant centers or hotels in New York City. They’re just… gone.

There are only a few possible reasons that military-aged men would be given entry into the country and then whisked away on buses to God knows where, separated from the standard illegal aliens. The most likely reason is that there’s an army being built. It’s not necessarily your standard army, though that’s possible, too. Instead, it’s likely an army ready to engage in coordinated terrorist activities.

A couple dozen terrorists were able to pull off 9/11. What would hundreds be able to do? Thousands? Tens of thousands? More?

Plandemic

Most are saying that Monkeypox is being positioned as Big Pharma’s next money-printing scam. I sincerely hope it’s as simple as that. If not, then we can expect the fearmongering to ramp up over the next few weeks before lockdowns are declared.

As with war and an economic collapse, I believe Monkeypox is less about the election and more about getting new and improved mRNA jabs for the masses to consume. We’ll know soon enough.

Mass Protests

The last three scenarios are the most likely. In fact, it wouldn’t surprise me if we saw all three. Mass protests are certain to happen before, during, and after the election regardless of the outcome. The real question is whether the ones before or even during the election are significant enough to warrant drastic measures such as martial law.

If I had to put a number on it, I’d say we’re close to 20% likely to see protests that rise to the level of electoral interference. Cities will burn. The Soros armies are fully armed with professional Antifa gear. Will they deploy in full force before or after the election?

Trump Jailed

This, to me, is the most unfortunate scenario on the list. It wouldn’t be the most destructive but it would represent the end of the United States as a free country. This is the only scenario on the list in which “official” means would be the source of our nation’s demise.

Jailing Donald Trump and preventing him from being allowed to compete in the election would give the UniParty Swamp the ability to use the Constitution to subvert the Constitution. The House ultimately picks the President of the United States just as the Senate ultimately picks the Vice President. If the UniParty Swamp deems Trump ineligible as a result of his conviction and subsequent jailing, then we will have a new Civil War.

And to those who think they don’t have the power to do so, remember that all they really need to do is tie things up until January 20th, 2025. We will be in an absolute Constitution crisis, of course, but they really don’t care. Remember, they’ll do whatever it takes to hold onto power even if it means destroying the very nation they hope to control.

Cyberattack

This is the most likely event that will happen during the election if they believe Donald Trump is poised to win. It’s both a real threat and a boogeyman. That’s a combination that sets the stage for the most turmoil from which their version of “truth” can emerge.

On this topic, I won’t go into details about how it could play out because I don’t want to be accused of giving anyone any ideas. They already know how to do it but to write it out here would be foolish nonetheless. Despite the ambiguity, it’s safe to assume that a massive cyberattack would suspend disbelief in almost any scenario. Think of it like pipes supposedly bursting in Fulton County, only more widespread and even less debunkable. That’s why I believe this is the most likely scenario; I’d put it near 40%.

Just Remember

As I said throughout the 2020 election debacle, there is something very important to remember. God is in control. If He wants Trump to win, there’s nothing anyone can do to prevent it. All of their machinations will miraculously fall short. And if He wants Trump to lose, there’s nothing we can do to stop it.

We don’t know what He has planned. All we can and must do is fight the good fight and do our part. He knows exponentially better than we do and if we get our way then chances are we’ll blow it.

For example, most of my readers would have loved to have seen the projected “Red Tsunami” of 2022 materialize. It didn’t. But here’s the thing. If it DID materialize and the GOP had a bigger majority, then Kevin McCarthy would still be Speaker of the House. Mitch McConnell might be Senate Majority Leader. The Biden-Harris regime would be electorally strengthened because they would have the narrative that all of their failings are due to Republicans controlling Congress.

If our will was done in 2022, then things would be very different today and one could argue they would be far worse.

Then, there’s the Trump scenario. The vast majority of us would have wanted Trump to not have the election stolen from him in 2020. But what if God’s plan requires Trump in office in 2025 through 2029? That wouldn’t have been possible if we got our way in 2020.

The point is this: Don’t stress over it. Work hard. Fight hard. Pray very, very hard. But don’t stress over it. We know we win in the very end regardless of what happens between now and then. We do our part and we keep pushing forward. Regardless of the results, it’s all part of the plan. Thankfully, the one who made the plan knows much more than we do.

Media

Trump Campaign Hacked, Internal Memos Sent to News Outlet

The Trump campaign has confirmed that some of their internal communications have been hacked. Politico also reported that they’ve been sent internal memos from an anonymous account that details some of the Trump campaign’s internal operations.

Trump campaign spokesperson, Steven Cheung, declined to say if they had further information substantiating the campaigns’ suggestion that it was targeted by Iran.

Cheung said, “On Friday, a new report from Microsoft found that Iranian hackers broke into the account of a ‘high ranking official’ on the U.S. presidential campaign in June 2024, which coincides with the close timing of President Trump’s selection of a vice presidential nominee.”

According to Washington Examiner:

Former President Donald Trump’s campaign has reported it has been hacked, and Politico confirmed confidential memos from the campaign were sent to them.

“These documents were obtained illegally from foreign sources hostile to the United States, intended to interfere with the 2024 election and sow chaos throughout our Democratic process,” Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung said in a statement to the Washington Examiner.

Cheung did not provide confirmation to Politico for how he knew the hackers were from Iran.

The news outlet reported they received documents from a person who called themselves only “Robert” from an AOL email account, and the records included research on Sens. J.D. Vance (R-OH), and Marco Rubio (R-FL).

After the assassination attempt on Trump, reports emerged that there had been unrelated Iranian plots to kill the former president. In his statement to the outlet, Cheung referred to those reports as he accused Iran of this hacking.

Politico described in an article how they came into possession of the information and hinted at some of the data in it:

On July 22, POLITICO began receiving emails from an anonymous account. Over the course of the past few weeks, the person — who used an AOL email account and identified themselves only as “Robert” — relayed what appeared to be internal communications from a senior Trump campaign official. A research dossier the campaign had apparently done on Trump’s running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, which was dated Feb. 23, was included in the documents. The documents are authentic, according to two people familiar with them and granted anonymity to describe internal communications. One of the people described the dossier as a preliminary version of Vance’s vetting file.

The research dossier was a 271-page document based on publicly available information about Vance’s past record and statements, with some — such as his past criticisms of Trump — identified in the document as “POTENTIAL VULNERABILITIES.” The person also sent part of a research document about Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, who was also a finalist for the vice presidential nomination.

The person said they had a “variety of documents from [Trump’s] legal and court documents to internal campaign discussions.”

Asked how they obtained the documents, the person responded: “I suggest you don’t be curious about where I got them from. Any answer to this question, will compromise me and also legally restricts you from publishing them.”

This is a breaking story and will be updated when more is known.

Image via Wikimedia Commons.

Left-wing extremism

Kamala Harris Offers Ludicrous Reason Why She Won’t Debate Donald Trump on Fox News

Deflection is neither a science nor an art, though Democrats have mastered its intricacies. Deflection is a response when no other narrative works. It’s usually a knee jerk reaction, but Democrats have turned it into their Standard Operating Procedure.

On Saturday, Trump made arrangements to replace the September 10 ABC debate he had scheduled with Joe Biden with a September 4 Fox News debate. He cited current litigation with ABC anchor George Stephanopoulos and the change in candidates for the shift.

As he noted on Truth Social:

“I have agreed with FoxNews to debate Kamala Harris on Wednesday, September 4th. The Debate was previously scheduled against Sleepy Joe Biden on ABC, but has been terminated in that Biden will no longer be a participant, and I am in litigation against ABC Network and George Slopadopoulos, thereby creating a conflict of interest. The FoxNews Debate will be held in the Great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, at a site in an area to be determined. The Moderators of the Debate will be Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum, and the Rules will be similar to the Rules of my Debate with Sleepy Joe, who has been treated horribly by his Party – BUT WITH A FULL ARENA AUDIENCE!….”

Harris’ team responded on Saturday by claiming Trump is “running scared”:

Kamala Harris Debate

“Donald Trump is running scared and trying to back out of the debate he already agreed to and running straight to Fox News to bail him out,” Harris campaign communications director Michael Tyler said in a statement Saturday. He needs to stop playing games and show up to the debate he already committed to on Sept 10. The Vice President will be there one way or the other to take the opportunity to speak to a prime time national audience.”

“We’re happy to discuss further debates after the one both campaigns have already agreed to. Mr. Anytime, anywhere, anyplace should have no problem with that unless he’s too scared to show up on the 10th.”

Reactions from social media have been a collective eyeroll regarding the ludicrous excuse.

Journalist Carmine Sabia reminded Harris that she already agreed to debate J.D. Vance on Fox News. Why won’t she debate Trump there?

As he posted on 𝕏:

Kamala Harris declines Fox News debate against Donald Trump. But she accepted a Fox News debate against JD Vance when Biden was the nominee. It is weird that she is so scared.

Conservative commentator Sean Davis said, “Trump agreed to debate Biden. Biden then dropped out of the race after everyone saw his brain was made of pudding. At no point did Trump ever agree to debate someone who wasn’t even nominated and hadn’t received a single vote.”

Former Fox News host Megyn Kelly reminded Barack Obama’s former campaign manager David Plouffe that Trump has shown nothing but courage in his media appearances.

He went on CNN for a debate w/a network that loathes him (not to mention to the NABJ). @BretBaier & @marthamaccallum would be totally professional & fair & have a history of asking Trump hard Qs – I know, I was there. Why is she too scared to do this on Fox?

Donald Trump Jr. called Harris a coward, noting, ” My father already did a debate with Fake News CNN, so is Kamala going to accept the debate with Fox News? Or is she going to be a coward and back out?”

With Trump unable to debate on ABC due to litigation and Harris unwilling to debate on Fox News, will there even be a debate between the two?

Left-wing extremism

Teacher Who Cannot Be Bothered To Work Warns Against “Correcting” People of Color

The effective confirmation of Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee means we all must endure at least three months of left-wing extremists telling us how to live our lives, and how to cast our vote – all while being cringe-inducing while doing so.

One group to watch are the “white women for Kamala Harris” who, as the name suggests, are white liberal women in favor of the Democrat who also happen to suffer from white guilt.

At the end of July, the group held a Zoom call where they all instructed others on how to prepare for the upcoming political battle for the White House.

After warning about toxicity, teacher turned self-proclaimed influencer, Arielle Fodor, proved old habits die hard and offered a lecture on how white women can assist “marginalized communities,” whatever those are.

“The toxic [sic] feels smaller when we support each other,” she told others on the Zoom call. “But don’t make it about yourself; as white women we need to use our privilege to make positive changes.”

“If you find yourself talking over or speaking for BIPOC [Black, Indigenous, and people of color] individuals or, God forbid, correcting them, just take a beat,” she added. “Instead, we can put our listening ears on.”

So, there we have it; political correctness has come full circle – where it’s now considered politically incorrect to correct someone if they’re incorrect.

Fortunately, many women on social media distanced themselves from the group.

Others found the instructional language demeaning.


Scroll to Top