Race

Race

Newsom Signs Law Creating Reparations Bureau as State Faces Billions in Debt

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed legislation Friday creating a new state agency to administer future programs for descendants of slaves, advancing his administration’s ongoing efforts to implement reparations policies despite fiscal constraints and political opposition.

The legislation, Senate Bill 518, establishes the Bureau for Descendants of American Slavery within the California Civil Rights Department.

The new bureau will operate under a deputy director appointed by the governor and will be divided into three primary divisions: Genealogy, Education and Outreach, and Legal Affairs.

Each division is tasked with handling specific components of the state’s developing reparations framework.

The Genealogy Division will be responsible for verifying individual lineage to confirm eligibility for state reparations programs.

The Education and Outreach Division will oversee public awareness campaigns focused on historical and systemic discrimination in housing, education, and employment.

The Legal Affairs Division will provide counsel to ensure that future reparations-related programs comply with state and federal law.

Funding for the bureau will depend on future legislative appropriations and may also include support from federal or private sources.

The new law establishes strict privacy protections governing genetic and personal data collected through genealogical research, explicitly restricting public access to that information.

Senate Bill 518 builds on earlier measures enacted under Newsom’s administration.

In 2020, he signed Assembly Bill 3121, which created a task force to study and recommend proposals for reparations targeting Black Californians.

That task force, convened amid nationwide protests following the death of George Floyd, later proposed financial payments exceeding $1 million per qualifying individual and called for repealing Proposition 209, California’s ban on affirmative action.

While Newsom has stopped short of endorsing direct cash payments, he has continued to advance related policy measures.

In 2024, he approved a formal state apology for slavery and other legislation exploring non-cash benefits such as homeownership assistance, education support, and community investment initiatives.

The creation of the new bureau follows multiple legislative delays and disagreements over how to structure a permanent agency to handle reparations.

The California Legislative Black Caucus had previously pushed for an office dedicated to implementing reparations recommendations, but that effort stalled amid disputes over funding and scope.

Newsom vetoed a similar bill in 2023, citing the absence of an appropriate agency to administer such programs.

Lawmakers later reintroduced the measure as SB 518, which resolves that issue by creating a permanent bureau to manage the process.

Under the bureau’s framework, eligibility for reparations programs will be based on lineage tracing to individuals enslaved or emancipated in the United States before 1900.

Those verified as descendants would qualify for participation in future reparations initiatives approved by the state legislature.

The Education and Outreach Division will coordinate public information efforts related to California’s history of discrimination, while the Legal Affairs Division will ensure that future programs adhere to established laws and regulations.

California’s debate over reparations has intensified in recent years as officials grapple with both the moral and financial implications of such programs.

Task force estimates placed the potential cost of comprehensive reparations at more than $800 billion—more than double the state’s annual budget.

Polling in 2024 showed that a majority of California voters opposed direct financial payments, though support for non-cash forms of compensation, such as education and housing programs, was higher.

Advocates for reparations argue that California bears responsibility for addressing the legacy of discriminatory state and local policies that restricted economic opportunity for Black residents even after the state joined the Union as a free state in 1850.

Critics, however, point to the state’s ongoing budget shortfall and question the feasibility of large-scale payments or expansive new programs.

The establishment of the Bureau for Descendants of American Slavery represents the most significant institutional step taken by the Newsom administration to prepare for potential implementation of reparations-related policies.

State officials have not yet indicated when the bureau will become operational, though the legislation allows work to begin once initial funding is approved.

Race, Woke

Oh No! Reverse Race-Swapping Brings a New White “Black Panther”

Sometime around 10 years ago it seems like movie, TV, and comic book studios all got their hands on a “Freaky Friday” machine. Freaky Friday, both the original 1976 and 2003 remakes, told the story of a girl and her mom who somehow swap bodies on Friday the 13th. As the two experience the other one’s lives, predictable hijinks ensue. 

But the studios have used the swapping machine to change the race and skin color of characters. It’s almost always in one direction, from white skin to black skin. As part of the degrading “we was kings” commentary from African supremacists (black people who think all the world’s technology and civilization was invented by African black people before whites took all the credit), modern movie makers insist on putting black people in historical pieces and genres where it’s just not credible. 

Come on, a black Anne Boleyn? Or, how about a black Queen Charlotte? For some reason, the Brits themselves seem obsessively interested in degrading the actual historical figures in their past by having them portrayed by black actors who are not in any way believable as part of English history. 

Take a look at a round up of movies, films, TV shows, and other recent “artistic” properties that decided to freshen up the work with race-swapping:

When the tables turn, the screaming starts. As dumb as it is to get worked up over who portrays a comic book character, nevertheless that’s what people are doing. And black commentators who loved them some race-swapping when it serviced their Hotep fantasies don’t like it so much when it means giving the white man a shot at defending Wakanda. 

Apparently, the fictional comic book black country of Wakanda is getting a new white lead, and black fans are big mad. 

And some people think it’s extremely funny. 

This user is sad, and believes that actor Will Smith is sad along with him. 

Race

American Liberals Mock White South African Refugees

“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free” – except if you’re white and from South Africa.

That’s the message from a large number of white Americans, liberal white Americans. You know, the only demographic in human history that actually hates itself and pushes its own kind in front of hostile people from other racial demographics in order to appear to be a good person. 

The Trump administration is now accepting white refugee families from South Africa. Yes, you read that right. “White refugee families.” It is in fact possible for white people to be from Africa, and also to be refugees. Since the Civil Rights era in the 60s, most white Americans have come to the strange conclusion that white people, and only white people, can never be victims of anything even when they truly are victims. 

Why do white families need to get out of South Africa? Because, since the end of racial apartheid, black political hatred for white people has gone out of control. The SA government recently passed a law allowing the state to seize land from white farmers to give to black farmers, and with no compensation. This is in the interest of social justice, of course. 

White people are murdered by blacks at an extraordinary rate, and that kind of murder is now socially and politically acceptable in South Africa. Julius Malema, leader of the National Assembly of South Africa, has led stadiums full of crowds in musical chants about killing white farmers. “Kill the Boer,” they chant, using the historic name for the white Dutch settlers who came to the continent hundreds of years ago. 

What do American Democrats do when they see these families coming to the United States? They make fun of them, they claim they “don’t look like refugees.” It’s simply a fact: American liberals and Democrats really do hate white people, they really do hate them in a racist way, and they don’t even feel any pressure to hide that fact. The Episcopal Church, for example, just decided to stop all help in refugee resettlement if that means they would have to help white South African people. 

CNN’s token conservative Scott Jennings does yeoman’s work pushing back on panels stacked with Democrats (mainly racist black Americans). Check out this exchange he had with Ashley Allison, who worked for the Biden campaign in 2020. Ashley says the whites can “go back to Germany,” apparently unclear on the fact that they’re not from Germany, but from South Africa. And their ancestors were from Holland, not Deutschland. “The people who are native to that land deserve their land back,” she said. Reminder: the white people living in South Africa are native to South Africa. 

Let’s see what Twitter/X users had to say. It’s not going well for Ashley. 

But it’s not just “incompetence” or ignorance. It’s moral malice against white people. 

Race

Black Woman Coming Back to America After Finding Out Africa is Worse

As you know, it’s very difficult to be a minority in the modern United States of America. The U.S. is widely known for being among the most hostile countries in the world for anyone who is not white, for gay people, for trans people, for religious minorities, and for all women. 

Except it’s not because that’s the opposite of the truth.

It is breathtaking how American citizens who enjoy the highest standard of living and the most legal freedom in the world believe they are living in an oppressive authoritarian regime. And they really do seem to believe it. Modern feminists get dolled up in Handmaid’s Tale costumes to protest the “misogyny” of the U.S.. What’s the misogyny, where’s the hatred of women? Why, it’s in any law that restricts any woman from having an abortion at any time. Outlaw third trimester abortions? Misogyny. 

And for black people? It’s never been worse. Sixty-one years since the passage of the Civil Rights Act, and black people are held down harder and more cruelly than ever before. Sure, they have full legal enfranchisement, they’re picked for college admissions and granted professional jobs preferentially over more qualified white candidates, but someone actually arrested some black people for brawling in Waffle House. 

OK, you might say, but what about the hundreds to thousands of innocent, unarmed black men killed by police every year? That’s what people who self-identified as “very liberal” actually believe. A survey by Skeptic.com found that those who identified their politics this way said they believed U.S. police (all assumed to be white) kill 1,000 or more unarmed black men every year. 

The actual number every year? About 20 to 35 – most of which are justified, such an involving an unarmed black man grabbing for a weapon.

The adage about good times creating weak men (and women) is obviously true. Only extremely comfortable, privileged people can begin to believe that they are actually held down and oppressed. They simply haven’t had any real hard times, so they make them up in their minds.

So it is with this young black woman, an American who decided to escape what she believes is the racist hell-hole called the United States to live in the African country of Ghana. Turns out, though, that living in a third-world country isn’t all its cracked up to be. In a social media video, the woman complains about the bribery and fraud expected in Ghana, as well as about the “bullsh*t animals and scorpions. 

Predictably, social media users were not entirely sympathetic:

Tee-hee:

Race

CEO Asks Forbidden Question, White Liberals Shriek

White Americans have been under a spell since at least the 1960s with the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. What was supposed to be, and should have been, the great legal leveler that banished government discrimination against any race of people has instead been used as a cudgel against white people while blacks predate on each other and everyone else. 

You can see that it’s a magical spell by the way people talk. Everyone in the U.S. sees the explosion of horrific behavior from black people. Everyone. Everyone knows it’s true. Everyone knows it’s thuggish and disgusting and dangerous, but everyone is terrified of calling it thuggish, disgusting, and dangerous. What scares white people the most, even more than an actual threat to their lives, is the idea of being called “racist.”

Who do we see brawling in online videos every day? American blacks. 

Who’s tearing up the furniture and shredding people’s hair at Waffle House? Blacks. 

So decent, law-abiding people pretend they don’t see what’s going on. They pretend that it’s not true that America’s black population is responsible for the majority of violent crimes. They pretend it’s not true that black people are enormously more likely to hurt or kill a white person than the other way around. But all of that is true. 

When a white person begins to emerge from the spell, he tiptoes as if he’s trying to sneak past a sleeping monster. He hems and haws, and uses lots of qualifying language. “I don’t want to seem racist but,” or “I know this may sound racist, and I wish to assure you that I have the utmost respect for the African American experience and the burden of slavery,” are common excuses from white people who think they need permission to notice that the black people around them are on a hair trigger. 

That was the approach Bill Mitchell took in a recent post on X. The CEO of Your Voice Studios tentatively, apologetically, asked why it seemed to always be blacks who were brawling in public. 

In his post, Mitchell wrote:

“I hesitate to post this because I don’t want to sound racist but I have to ask. 

Are these huge brawls in public between black people a cultural thing? Because you never really see a bunch of white people fighting in the street or in a public place like a mall or an airport or a restaurant.

And the head-stomping part. I mean that’s attempted murder. You could go to prison for years for that and even though they’re being filmed, they seem to do it with abandon.

I’m having a hard time comprehending the whole thing.”

Only because we’re living in a society that has allowed blacks to get away with violence and murder (just look at the people who donated half a million dollars to 17-year-old Karmelo Anthony who admitted to knifing and killing a white teen at a track meet) for decades does anyone say “I don’t want to sound racist” before making such an obviously true statement. 

Let’s take a look at the responses to Mitchell’s post. Naturally, you have some liberal white people lying so they “don’t look racist.”

Then this:

Which got the usual response from a liberal white woman, the demographic most disconnected from reality:

The majority of responders, though, said that they too noticed reality: it’s almost always black people. 

Race

Mother of Teen Killer Thinks Her Family Are the Real Victims

Imagine two parties:

1. A father whose son was stabbed in the heart and killed by another teen
2. The mother of the teen who killed the father’s son

Which one is the victim? Think that sounds easy? Not in 2025. If you’re the mother of confessed knife-killer Karmelo Anthony, you believe that you and your family are the real victims. Karla Hayes, mother of Karmelo Anthony, called a press conference and berated the public for “discriminating” against her family and for being angry that her son killed another boy. 

Only blacks in America would have the nerve. Oh yes, race is very much at issue. Karmelo Anthony is black, and Austin Metcalf, the teen he killed, was white. In this insane racial hothouse called America 2025, public sympathy is on the side of the confessed killer’s family. The Anthonys have already taken in a half-million dollars in online donations, and the media reports that they’ve begun spending it on a Cadillac Escalade and a new McMansion to live in. 

The family press conference started off with an even more astonishing display of chutzpah, with a man named Dominique Alexander speaking for Karmelo Anthony’s family. It turns out that Jeff Metcalf, father of the boy slain by Karmelo Anthony, showed up at the Anthony family press conference. Dominiqe Alexander, a self-described clergyman, chastised Jeff Metcalf for showing up, saying Metcalf was “disrespectful” to Metcalf’s dead son. 

During her tirade, Karla Hayes, mother of the accused Karmelo Anthony, shouted that she had raised her son correctly in a two-parent family “with structure.” It is not clear, then, why she has a different surname than her knife-wielding son, or just what kind of “structure”  she was referring to. 

The family’s been having a red letter week, as their very good boy, who didn’t do nothin’ wrong and acted in self-defense, they say, got his bail reduced to a nice affordable $250,000. Karmelo Anthony is resting comfortably under home arrest until his trial. 

You can watch Karla Hayes put on crocodile tears and yell at the world in this video from Collin Rugg’s X account:

Here are some of the reactions:

Race

Family of Confessed Stabber Karmelo Anthony Says He’s the Real Victim

The most effective kind of lying is the “reversal.” It’s what it sounds like. You simply reverse truth and falsehood, and do it with bravado. Sadly, it almost always works, especially if the lie is delivered with dramatic emotion. 

Say you collide with someone’s car in a grocery parking lot with your cart, putting a huge dent in the car while the person was backing out of a parking. You, with your cart, didn’t bother to look before you walked behind the car, which was backing out slowly and responsibly. But you don’t want to be blamed, and you want to make onlookers believe the driver did something to you, rather than the other way around. So you start yelling or crying, and saying “She backed out too fast and didn’t even look! She could have killed me!”

Chances are in America in 2025, that ploy would work. We are conditioned to believe melodramatic claims of victimhood, because we’re all afraid of being accused of being “bigoted” or “insensitive.” This tendency blinds us to obvious lies from people who caused their own sorry situation but want to blame it on an innocent party. 

It scales all the way up to alleged murder. You’ve seen the coverage of the killing of 17-year-old white high school student Austin Metcalf. According to what we know so far, Metcalf told a black teen, Karmelo Anthony, that he was seated in the wrong spot at the the track meet they were attending. Though media reports conflict, it appears that Metcalf may have tried to move Anthony’s gear bag. 

So, naturally, Karmelo Anthony took out the big knife he had purposefully brought to the track meet and plunged it into Metcalf’s heart, killing him. Everyone knows what’s probably going on, but few want to say it. Young black men, statistically, are extraordinarily violent and likely to fly off the handle if anyone “disses” them. Being “dissed” includes being asked to move, or being told, even in the smallest way, that you’re doing something you’re not supposed to do. 

Almost unbelievably, the family of alleged murderer Karmelo Anthony (and he admitted to cops on scene that he stabbed Austin Metcalf) is claiming that he, the knife wielder, is the actual victim. Not only that, but the family has set up online fundraisers for Anthony. You have to see it to believe it. 

Commentator Matt Walsh pointed it out on X:

This is the second fundraiser by the Anthony family, since they were kicked off the platform GoFundMe. Here’s what their original fundraiser said. Does this sound like a family that cares even a little bit that their son just killed a 17-year-old?

As of this writing, the family of the confessed killer has raised  almost $170,000. Let’s see what X users had to say. 

Frustratingly but not shockingly, there are tons of people, black and white, who think the killer is actually the victim. 

Race

Social Media Users Debate If It’s Really Murder if Victim is White

Until America’s woke phase beginning in about 2015, most of us wouldn’t have believed that our friends, family, and neighbors could believe as they believe, and act as they have acted. When the government violated the constitution during the “pandemic,” the vast majority of adult citizens rolled over and took it. They shut their businesses down, they obeyed illegal orders and stayed inside their homes. But more, millions of Americans cheered these legal and civil liberties violations while turning their own family in to snitch lines. 

We are not the people we thought we were; now we know how many of us would have been good Germans. 

But our compliance, our cooperation with “authorities” who work against our own interests, didn’t pop up overnight. For decades Americans have been under a set of moral myths that developed during the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s. The movement did not merely and only bring fair legal enfranchisement to black people, a goal all civilized people shared. It went further, and made saints out of black people and demons out of whites. 

In 2025, the seeds sown in the 60s are blossoming into rotten fruit. Despite the obvious reality of wildly disproportionate criminal violence committed by blacks, “respectable” media and white Americans won’t tell the truth. They blame white people for the actions of black criminals, going so far as to excuse or justify murders of white people when a black person feels like expressing displeasure. 

The recent killing of white 17-year-old high school track competitor Austin Metcalf by, allegedly, a black teen, is a case in point. According to sources so far, Metcalf was at a track meet and noticed the teen sitting in his (Metcalf’s) assigned spot. When the other teen refused to move, Metcalf allegedly moved the teens’s backpack. This, according to online commentary, justified the black teen stabbing Metcalf in the heart. 

Take this example: 

That’s right. It’s socially acceptable in 21st century American to justify an apparent murder when the victim is white and pissed off a black man who didn’t want to follow the rules of courtesy. Mr. Baggz calls anyone pointing this out a “white supremacist.”

Let’s see what onlookers had to say. We’ve got some other black commentators who also think it’s cool to kill if you feel dissed:

Not everyone, though. 

Race

You Don’t Own Me-Democrat Mainstays Break Away

♫You don’t own me
I’m not just one of your many toys

Lesley Gore’s 1963 anthem of independence could be their theme song. Who? The people you’d never expect to be stumping for right-wing politics, the “demographics,” as we call them today, that everyone assumes are leftists for life.

Gays and blacks. Have you noticed how many more of each are “coming out” as conservatives? 

Check out this young black woman who goes by Michelle Monique. One hopes her outspoken condemnation of the Democratic Party throws some fear into their hearts:

From the reactions to her video, a lot of Americans are glad to see it. 

There’s evidence all over social media of a defection of liberal mainstays to the right of the aisle. People are saying it themselves under their own names, on camera. 

But finding out just how many “leftists for life” have gone to the right is trickier. For blacks, we have some reasonably good data. Polling works to figure out how many blacks have shifted from the Democrat to the Republican party, because “blacks” are a discrete category. Everyone knows what a black person is. But it’s not the same when you try to figure out how many homosexuals have fallen off the leftist wagon and jumped on the Trump train. 

Why? Because of the phrase “LGBTQ+.” Let me explain. The initialism stands for:

Lesbian
Gay
Bisexual
Trans
Queer
(who the hell knows what +means)

That’s not a discrete category. It’s a mashed-together, artificial jumble of disparate kinds of people who share nothing in common that would legitimately make them part of the same demographic. Homosexuals (and bisexuals) are attracted to the same sex. They are not whatever “trans” is. Homosexuals don’t claim to be born in the wrong body. They don’t claim to be a biological sex they are not. And a growing number (your correspondent is one of them) want the “trans and queer” out of our demographic category. 

This is an example of “forced teaming.” That’s a manipulation tactic that deceptive people use in order to falsely convince the targets of their con that their marks are on the same team with the very people trying to take advantage of them. 

But because society has swallowed the idea of “LGBTQ+”, pollsters no longer measure the homosexual vote. Gays are mashed in with the insane men in dresses and women with beards, giving the public the false impression that every gay person is interchangeable with people who slice off their genitals and want your kids to do the same. 

You may find this guy even more surprising, but he’s not the only gay guy who thinks this way. Young Link Lauren is a social media “influencer,” but from the conservative side of the aisle. He’s a frequent guest commentator on The Megyn Kelly Show, and he spares no Democrat’s feelings. Effeminate though he may be, the Dems he lambastes are more limp-wristed by far. 

Link gives a boost to the return of masculine decision-making in politics:

Most responses are welcoming:

But not everyone’s picking up what Link is laying down. You can’t win ‘em all!

Race

“Anti-Racist” Woman Looks More Like a Plain Old Narcissist

The term “virtue signaling” has become a part of everyday vocabulary in America. It’s what we say about people who proclaim their political allegiances in a boastful way for the purpose of being complimented. They want to hear how moral they are, how giving they are, how very-much-better-and-kinder they are than other people. 

That matters. For such people, it’s not only that they want to be told they are good, kind, and giving. They want to be told that they are more of these things than anyone else. Narcissism, excessive self-regard, disguises itself as humility. It works on a lot of people because it uses the “reversal” pattern: their behavior seems to be generous, and seems to be kind, so how could it be selfish or wicked? 

This is also how the “big lie” principle infamously articulated by Joseph Goebbels works: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” But why does it work? What is it that makes people believe it? It’s that most people are basically, fundamentally decent. They don’t often lie or misrepresent themselves in a serious way. So, they don’t believe that there are other humans who do these things. If Jane says she really cares, that must mean she really cares, and it would be churlish to think she’s actually pitiless and self-centered. 

Thus, the great number of genuinely pitiless and self-centered people among us go undetected for a long time, or by a large number of people. So it is with the white leftist virtue-signaler. You’ve all seen examples of superannuated baby boomers trying to continue to live in their glory days of youth when they were “fighting for civil rights” or “working for women’s liberation.” Kamala Harris’ speech at the famous Edmund Pettus Bridge in Alabama, the site of a storied civil rights march that ended in police beating black protesters in 1965, is a good example. For Harris and other leftists, they need to maintain the illusion that they “care”, and also that nothing has changed for the better. 

MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow shows how absurd this pandering to blacks is when she affects to be disturbed by the firing of black colleague Joy Reid (an unrepentant black racist). Maddow claims there’s something sinister about firing a “woman of color,” all the while pretending that MSNBC didn’t hire three more people of color to replace Reid.

On the everyday level, countless Democrat white women have been competing for praise and adulation by positioning themselves as the most tender, caring saviors of black people. It’s a kind of masochistic narcissism. They claim to be “taking a knee” and “humbling” themselves to “fight racism,” but they’re actually preening and posing hoping to be told how special and good they are. 

Take this embarrassing display dug up by the X/Twitter account “Defiant Ls”. 

The white woman in the video overlays text telling the viewer what she allegedly does “when black women are speaking.” She then puts tape over her mouth and showily takes notes in a spiral notebook. See how GOOD she is? 

Fewer and fewer people are buying these maudlin set pieces. Take a look at the online reaction. 


Scroll to Top