Media

CNN was forced into a commercial break after a shouting match ensued when one of the unhinged commentators was triggered and resorted to racial outbursts when facts were not in her favor.

Scott Jennings lit the match when he called out the Biden administration for letting everybody walk across the border without due process, to which Republican strategist Shermichael Singleton insisted they must leave.

“We are a sovereign nation,” Singleton said. “You cannot just come into our country illegally whenever the heck you want… we can’t do it to any other country on the face of this Earth.”

However, fellow unhinged commentator Ana Navarro tried to draw false parallels between slaves and other illegal immigrants who voluntarily crossed the border without authorization.

“We have a hell of a lot of people, other than the Black people who were brought here as slaves, who came to this country illegally,” Navarro said.

However, Singleton pointed out that the slaves “were brought here against our will” unlike illegal immigrants who “decided to walk their butt across the border.”

“There’s a big difference. There is a big difference,” he insisted.

“That’s exactly what I just said,” Navarro said, her voice getting sharper and louder. “That’s exactly what I just said. Sure, Shermichael. Sure, Shermichael. Looking—act indignant. That’s exactly what I just said.”

Meanwhile, Navarro and host Abby Philips continued to insist that Singleton had misheard the statement, with The View’s regular asserting that she has always advocated for Black people to say anything derogatory.

“Because you have advocated for Black people—great. Congratulations. Last time I checked, I’m Black. You’re not,” Singleton said.

“That’s right. I’m Latino, and my people are being racially profiled,” Navarro blurted.

Either way, illegal immigration is not remotely connected to slavery, and Navarro’s attempt to create the false analogy falls flat on its stomach. Similarly, all races, including Asians and black Africans, are being deported, thus making Navarro’s claim that her race was being profiled preposterous.

Nonetheless, liberals often inject racism and slavery into almost every conversation involving a Black person, in a likely attempt to gaslight them into agreeing. Former President Joe Biden even suggested that Black people were not indeed Black unless they were willing to vote for him.

“If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t Black,” he said.

Having a Black person who is willing to call out the false racial narrative is always priceless and a huge threat to liberals. Subsequently, Black conservatives are usually the most hated by the left and are usually subject to various forms of racism by white liberals.

Meanwhile, Scott Jennings, who is rumored to be seeking another office instead of schooling liberals on CNN, watched the showdown from afar.

Word on the street is that he is considering running to replace the retiring Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) and is waiting for Trump’s green light to proceed. Without a suitable replacement for Jennings, CNN risks losing whatever little credibility it had left.

As we reported on Friday, a former New Mexico county judge and his wife were cuffed and taken into federal custody Thursday after authorities discovered they were housing a Tren de Aragua member.

Former Doña Ana County Magistrate Judge Joel Cano and his wife, Nancy Cano, had their home raided by Immigration and Customs Enforcement earlier this week.

Later, CNN anchors had meltdowns, calling the development “aggressive, dramatic, and significant.”

“This is something that we have certainly not seen before, but appears to be part of this aggressive approach the Trump administration has toward immigration,” said CNN’s Katelyn Polantz.

Blitzer called it “very dramatic and significant indeed” while noting the rarity of such an action.

Watch:

FBI Director Kash Patel, posting on X, wrote:

“We believe Judge Dugan intentionally misdirected federal agents away from the subject to be arrested in her courthouse, Eduardo Flores Ruiz, allowing the subject — an illegal alien — to evade arrest. Thankfully, our agents chased down the perp on foot and he’s been in custody since, but the Judge’s obstruction created increased danger to the public.”

The arrests highlight the Trump administration’s intensified crackdown on illegal immigration as FBI Director Patel adopts a more aggressive approach to immigration-related law enforcement.

This is not the first time a judge has been arrested under President Trump for aiding illegal immigrants.

During Trump’s first term, Massachusetts Judge Shelley Joseph was charged with helping an illegal alien evade ICE.

New Mexico Judge Joel Cano resigned last year after federal agents arrested an illegal gang member living on his family’s property.

Cano is now permanently barred from serving in any judicial role, reinforcing the administration’s commitment to enforcing immigration laws at every level.

Please visit The Daily Fetched for more stories like this.

Image Credit: © James Crisp/Special to Courier Journal via Imagn Content Services, LLC

CNN commentator Scott Jennings criticized the backlash against comedian Bill Maher for meeting with President Donald Trump, calling the response from the left “an attempt to intimidate people” and prevent any future dialogue between liberals and conservatives.

As reported by The Gateway Pundit, Jennings made the remarks during a recent CNN segment while discussing the outrage Maher faced after visiting the White House earlier this month.

Though Maher made it clear he was not joining the MAGA movement, critics on the left still reacted with hostility, accusing him of legitimizing Trump.

One of the harshest responses came from actor and comedian Larry David, who wrote an op-ed in The New York Times that compared Maher’s dinner with Trump to dining with Adolf Hitler.

The piece condemned both Maher and Trump’s supporters and has been widely circulated among Maher’s detractors.

Jennings offered his perspective on the controversy, pointing out that the criticism wasn’t merely about Maher’s specific meeting but about discouraging any similar future interactions.

“The message of this is not to — because Bill Maher, first of all, I totally agree, he’s totally in the right to do it,” Jennings said. “I loved his monologue, even though I disagree with almost everything he believes politically. He was right to do this and he was right to speak out about it.”

Jennings continued:

“But this isn’t about that dinner. It’s about the next one. Because this is the modern Left. It’s an attempt always to intimidate people into not ever doing it again. It’s to silence yourselves, or we’ll do it for you.”

According to Jennings, the goal is to send a clear signal to public figures on the left: avoid engaging with President Trump or his supporters, or face social and professional consequences.

“That’s the purpose of this op-ed, so that the next comedian, or the next person on the American left chooses not to speak to Donald Trump,” he added. “This is all an effort to get people not to do what you just said, which is to talk to each other and our political leaders.”

The incident highlights growing concerns over ideological gatekeeping and the left’s increasing intolerance toward dissent or dialogue with political opponents.

Maher, who has frequently clashed with conservatives, now finds himself under fire from the very audience that once applauded him.

Please visit RVM News for more stories like this.

A recent report circulating in the media suggests that the Trump administration no longer considers Russia a major cybersecurity threat.

The claim, based on an alleged memo from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), has drawn sharp criticism from officials at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), who have called it “garbage.”

The Guardian reported that a memo from CISA, which operates under DHS, outlined new cybersecurity priorities that focused on China and protecting local systems but did not mention Russia.

The report also cited an anonymous source claiming that analysts at the agency were verbally instructed not to follow or report on Russian cyber threats, despite Russia having previously been a primary focus.

The source further alleged that cybersecurity personnel cuts within the agency had weakened U.S. defenses, stating, “Russia and China are our biggest adversaries. With all the cuts being made to different agencies, a lot of cybersecurity personnel have been fired. Our systems are not going to be protected, and our adversaries know this.”

The report also included the claim, “People are saying Russia is winning. Putin is on the inside now.”

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to the report, calling it “unbelievable.”

Other officials have also dismissed the claims, emphasizing that the memo in question was not produced by the Trump administration.

The allegations come amid longstanding media narratives linking Trump to Russia, many of which have been debunked in recent years.

Critics argue that the latest report follows the same pattern, attempting to reignite controversy over Trump’s approach to Russia despite a lack of verifiable evidence.

The Guardian has acknowledged its left-leaning perspective in past reporting, and while it often covers stories overlooked by U.S. outlets, this latest claim has been met with skepticism.

Some have drawn comparisons to past incidents where media outlets ran with documents or reports later found to be unreliable.

As of now, there has been no official confirmation of the memo’s authenticity, and DHS officials have categorically rejected the notion that the Trump administration instructed agencies to ignore Russian cyber threats.

Read more articles like this at LifeZette

The left is having a very hard time accommodating the reality of a conservative electoral sweep and a national tilt to the right. To put it in mental health diagnostic terms that leftists would understand, they appear to have an “adjustment disorder”; that is, they’re having great difficulty adjusting to a new political world. 

It’s been decades since being a newsman or reporter was a working class job, and it shows. Today’s TV “personalities” are as removed from the concerns of the average American as it is possible to be. More than half the country voted for Donald Trump, and the majority is aligned with several of Trump’s policies on expelling illegal aliens and having the government recognize the reality that there are only two sexes. 

You’d never know it to watch mainstream news coverage on NBC, CNN, NPR, or in the pages of the New York Times and the like. The writers and on-camera personalities are not only at odds with majority American opinion, they don’t even seem to be aware that they are. Take someone like CBS anchor Margaret Brennan, who has repeatedly disgraced herself with her hostile, mean-girl demeanor and scoffing at Donald Trump and JD Vance. Her latest move was to react to Vance’s address to a meeting of European leaders—Vance took them to task for surveilling and punishing the speech of their own citizens—by claiming that “free speech” allowed the Nazis to perpetrate the Holocaust. 

Or, take CNN’s Brianna Keilar, who seems to be personally offended on behalf of the numerous federal staffers that Trump has fired as duplicative, incompetent, or obstructive to his agenda. Like most on the left, Keilar seems to be unclear on the fact that a boss has the right to hire and fire subordinates. She seems to want to suggest that Elon Musk, Trump’s pick to head the Department of Government Effiency (DOGE), is somehow out of control, or acting in a way he’s. . .not supposed to? 

Her guest, Stephen Miller takes the nonsense right apart on the air. As if he were instructing a schoolchild taking her first civics lesson, Miller calmly explains, “The way that Article II (of the Constitution) works is that a president wins an election, and then he appoints staff . . .and those staff report to him.”

Undeterred, Keilar keeps going, asking, “Does Elon Musk know he’s not in charge of DOGE?” It’s the kind of disingenuous fakery the Democrats resort to constantly now as they refuse to engage on substance. Miller comes right back: “Again, the president runs the government, and the president appoints advisors. . .and then those staff in turn execute the president’s commands and directions to all the agencies of the federal government.”

Take a look at the video highlighted by Collin Rugg to watch Keilar try to tamp down her frustration as Miller placidly smiles. 

Keilar is staring daggers at Miller as he says, “This is how democracy works, something that we treasure in America.”

X/Twitter users picked up on what was going on: 

Graeme was delighted with the primary-school lesson delivery: 

Alan noted how strange it was for a national news anchor to seem “confused” about the president’s ability to fire federal staff. 

CNN commentator Ashley Allison accused the network and former presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden of racial and gender discrimination while defending Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Allison made the outlandish claim while debating Scott Jennings, who supported President Trump’s decision to scrap the policy.

Allison said that as a “black woman in this country,” she does “not have the same opportunity” as the other panelists.

“I do not have the same opportunity as you. I know I don’t. And you know that too,” Allison said.

“I’m not talking about how you feel. I’m talking about how I feel, me, a black woman in this country,” she continued after Jennings interrupted her.

She continued to list her qualifications, which she said include a law degree, a master’s, and two bachelor’s degrees – which she claimed is probably more than all the panelists combined.

“And I have always been the least-paid person on payroll at every institution I have worked in, and it’s not because…,” she dropped the bombshell.

One of the panelists sought clarification on whether even a Democratic White House paid her less than other employees for being a black woman.

“Even in the White House?” Asked the panelist.

“Even in the White House,” Allison confirmed.

The panelist also suggested that it was the Left’s problem as she did not work for Republicans when the alleged racial discrimination occurred.

“Whose fault is that?” he asked. “I don’t think you worked for George W. or Trump.”

Allison worked for Obama as a senior policy advisor and the Deputy Director of the White House Office of Public Engagement, managing associate directors who worked with leaders in the African American community and other groups, such as LGBTQ+.

She also worked for the Biden-Harris campaign in 2020, which, according to her statement, must also have underpaid her based on her race and gender.

Ironically, she also inadvertently accused CNN of racial discrimination by stating that she did not have the same opportunity as other panelists. Similarly, claiming that she has always been the least paid in every institution she has worked for, suggests that even CNN was underpaying her.

Either she was lying, or Democrats have actually racially discriminated against her, with the former being the most likely. Her credibility took a nosedive when she claimed that DEI did not exist when she worked at the White House between 2014 and 2017, while Obama had already introduced it in August 2011 under Executive Order 13583. It is also unfathomable that someone employed to fight discrimination would herself be subjected to it. 

While Allison’s racial discrimination claims at CNN and the White House are hard to believe, the policy she defends perpetuates racial discrimination.

In 2023, the Supreme Court ruled against Harvard University and the University of North Carolina’s race-based college admissions practices. The court stated that the practices violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection clause.

According to Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR), “DEI policies are nothing more than state-sanctioned racial discrimination.”