LGBTQ+

LGBTQ+

LGBTQ “Leader” Busted for Allegedly Trying to Meet 14-Year-Old

/

We try for a lighthearted tone on Wokespy, but some of the things we cover just aren’t funny, and this is one of them. If you don’t know journalist Andy Ngo, we recommend you follow his work. Formerly based in Portland where he covered the destruction and violence of Antifa, Ngo had to flee the U.S. for Britain after he was nearly killed—he’s been assaulted multiple times, once leading to a brain injury. The Portland police cannot or will not protect him.

He’s brave, though, and he brings news the mainstream doesn’t want you to see, like this story of an “LGBTQ” leader caught trying to hook up with what he thought was a 14-year-old boy. Michael Knaapen led the LGBTQ Diversity Council under the auspices of the Maryland Democratic Party, that is until this news came out.


Be warned—the language in the video, which was filmed by Alex Rosen, who produces content exposing child predators, describes graphic and disturbing sexual content, with themes of violence. Details are not yet fully available, but it appears that the two men depicted in this video posed online as a teen boy in order to lure pedophiles into revealing themselves. According to what we can see, it appears Knaapen was talking to who he thought was a teen boy, and then agreed to meet “him” in the real world.

Take a watch:

It always seems to surprise people when they find that those who advertise themselves as caregivers, or as activists for a cause, turn out to be predatory. But it shouldn’t. Where else would predators go but the places and positions that give them an air of respectability, and ready access to their targets?

Knaapen described himself online as an advocate for patients and the disabled.

Wolves in sheep’s clothing have been popping up all over the LGBTQ world. There’s been a rash of stories recently about schools and libraries naively mounting “drag queen story hour” presentations without adequately vetting the presenters. Then surprise, surprise, the “queens” turn out to be sex offenders. The Houston Public Library admitted to hosting “Tatiana Mala Nina” (mala nina means “bad girl”), a convicted pedophile.

The public is getting fed up with it, judging from the reaction on Twitter/X.

They’re also noticing how it’s so often leftists and Democrats caught up in this sexual improprieties.

Patrick wonders if anyone with the Maryland Democrats will care.

We hope “Winters” isn’t right, but we suspect he is.

What do you think? Will this constant stream of exposed perversion and child predation ever catch up with the left?

Celebrities, LGBTQ+, Media

Yes, LGBT(Whatever) is Coming For Your Children

/

Yes, they are coming for your children.

Thanks to LibsofTikTok for unearthing the above video – see if you can make sense of what’s going on in this video. Apparently, it’s a man dressing up as a woman who dresses up as a kid to sing “songs for littles” to children—while indoctrinating them with lunatic ideas about how they can choose to be a boy or a girl.

Let’s see if we can sort this out. The man pictured below recorded a one-minute video pretending to be a popular children’s Youtuber known as “Miss Rachel.” Miss Rachel, an actual woman, runs a wildly successful Youtube channel called “Songs for Littles.” But what looks wholesome on the surface has darkness underneath; Miss Rachel’s on-show sidekick “Jules”—also an actual woman—pretends to be “non-binary.” As with most such women, we think Jules looks like a typical young lesbian, but apparently she’s neither man nor woman, so who can say?

To the anger of many parents, Miss Rachel has been shilling gender ideology on her show for kids. The performer uses “they/them” pronouns on the show to refer to her co-cast member, who can often be seen wearing clothes featuring the “trans colors” (have you ever wondered why those colors are baby pink and baby blue?). Speaking in a high-pitched voice reminiscent of a manic kindergarten teacher, Miss Rachel sings songs to children accompanied by her very-much-not-a-lesbian-and-definitely-not-a-boy-or-a-girl friend Jules.

Back to the new video. This obvious man donned his best Miss Rachel costume and talks to the children presumably watching him about something “super important—what it means to be transgender.” With his deep male voice, he instructs the audience that children can be a boy, or a girl, or “a little bit of both.”

Everyday Americans are finally waking up to the Trojan Horse that is transgenderism, and they have no intention of letting their children be led into madness and sex changes by modern day crossdressing pied pipers. And thanks to Elon Musk’s free speech policy on X/Twitter, they can say so without fear of being banned and called bigots.

User Glenda points out something most of us know:

We’re with user Duncan on this one. What possesses parents to allow their kids to take in this media brainwashing?

Go back up and listen to the video, and you’ll probably agree with Steve Baker. That voice and cadence from Mister Miss Rachel gives us the creeping willies.



This comment hits the bullseye. The most astonishing and disturbing part of the trans onslaught is how many American adults suddenly stopped being able to detect the most obvious perverted and predatory interest.

When did you notice that Americans lost the ability to see obvious child predators? Tell us about it in the comments!

LGBTQ+

Buffalo Bills Announce Support For Gay-Only Football League

/

There’s good news for those who like watching sport based solely on athletes’ sexuality – as the National Gay Flag Football League (NGFFL) has expanded to Buffalo. 

The NGFFL was launched in 2002, and currently comprises of more than 200 teams in 25 leagues across the United States and Canada.

Each year, every team competes for the “Gay Bowl”, with this year’s edition set to be held in Austin, TX, from October 31 – November 3.

NGFFL Commissioner Joel Horton said he was “thrilled to bring inclusive flag football to Buffalo with the support of the Buffalo Bills”, even though teams are capped at a 20% heterosexual limit.

The New York Giants, New England Patriots, New York Jets, Miami Dolphins, Arizona Cardinals, Chicago Bears, Washington Commanders, and the Seattle Seahawks have also previously expressed support for the league.

“We are excited to join the NFL and other Clubs across the league in their support of the NGFFL,” said Buffalo Bills Vice President of Community Impact, Michelle Roberts. “Through our sponsorship, we are looking forward to expanding the impact of the NGFFL in our community.”

Bills fans were not unanimous in their support for the announcement on Instagram.

Others noted the Bills’ appalling record in the NFL, and questioned whether a franchise which has failed to win in all four of its Super Bowl appearances had its priorities in order.

Another user questioned the inclusivity of the NGFFL.

What’s your view? Do we need a football league based on sexuality? Let us know in the comments below.

Big Cities, LGBTQ+, Polling

San Fran Mayor London Breed Is Falling Down Over Drag Queens

/

You have to see and hear it to believe it. Some night see this article as highlighting the lunatic fringe… but it’s actually the mainstream left at this point. Take a gander at this clip from a recent mayoral candidate debate in San Francisco.

Mayor and candidate London Breed asks candidate Mark Farrell to show his fealty to the cult of LGBTQ+ by naming three drag queens from the city to prove his “street cred” in supporting the LGBTQ+ community.  

Apparently, this is the second time in as many weeks that Breed tried to corner Farrell for insufficient enthusiasm about men in dresses. At the first mayoral debate the week prior, Farrell “couldn’t” name his favorite San Francisco drag queen. Their names are so absurd he probably could’ve said anything, like “Sister Princess,” and it would’ve been believable. And for anyone who doesn’t believe me, there’s a drag queen named “Sister Gay Bitch Milkshake” – so yes, anything really would do.

At the second debate, Breed said, “You were at the debate last week and couldn’t name any drag queens on your own.” She then offered Farrell a “chance to redeem” himself by naming three “LGBTQ advisors for [his] campaign,” and then three drag queens from the city by the bay.

Farrell responded predictably by trying to burnish his LGBTQ credits. Farrell said he, a straight white male, put forward city legislation to reimburse gay couples who were taxed by the federal government on their health insurance benefits. “I’m incredibly proud of the support I have from our LGBTQ community,” he said.

You have to feel for a candidate like Farrell a little, even if you’re watching the performance with secondhand embarrassment. No one who wants to get elected in a place like that has much choice but to kowtow to the “queer” community. But do you have to say things like “I’m super pro-LGBTQ,” Mark? As the kids say, “cringe.”

Twitter/X users, of course, have no such loyalty.

Paul questions mayor Breed’s priorities:

User Alan Sea got a laugh out of this writer:


Maybe Farrell should hire J. Perry to write his speeches—Perry sounds like a crowd-pleaser!

Admitted: we’re closing with this one just because it’s naughty.

LGBTQ+

Death Penalty For Child Rapists Sparks Fury Among Transgender Activists

/

A Tennessee bill to allow the death penalty for child rapists has been criticized by LGBTQ+ activists.

Republican Gov. Bill Lee approved the legislation in May without issuing a statement which is set to go into effect on July 1, 2024. It follows a similar move by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis last year.

Under the new Tennessee law, state prosecutors can pursue the death penalty when an adult is convicted of aggravated rape against a child. Other punishments include life imprisonment without parole, or imprisonment for life.

After signing the bill, Gov. Lee told reporters that such crimes are “some of the most heinous that there are”.

Following the wider publication of the bill’s existence, some LGBTQ+ activists amazingly took to social media platform X to vent their dismay.

One social media user who claimed the law was “cool in theory but bad in practice” due to the unevidenced targeting of racial minorities and gay people later locked their account after coming under heavy fire from those astounded at their comments.

Nevertheless, “@stinkypissbitch” was not alone in their bizarre take.

Fortunately, most users saw sense in the legislation, noting that it would indeed affect LGBTQ+ people who committed heinous crimes as much as it would heterosexuals.

…while another presented a graph highlighting the statistics of why some demographics may be more impacted than others.

What’s your view? Should all states follow suit, or has Tennessee Gov. Lee been too extreme in passing the bill? Let us know in the comments below.

LGBTQ+

Can You Spot The Problem With This Video?

/

The rainbow flags have caused a stir throughout pride month, but it seems it’s not just America’s most Woke cities which are taking part.

Rainbow roads – once reserved for Mario Kart games – are now across the country, and the responses to their critics have been controversial to say the least. So far this month, a manhunt was launched in St Petersburg, FL, after a driver performed donuts on the city’s rainbow mural, while three teenagers in Washington were arrested for a similar protest against the pride flag.

The city of Fredericton in New Brunswick, Canada, has also joined the rainbowification with the city’s X account sharing footage of a road being redecorated. However, you may notice a problem…

Yup, that’s right! The city worker – donning the Tampa Bay Buccaneers on his helmet – had no paint on the roller.

The latest attempt to virtue signal undoubtedly was met with stark criticism, forcing the city into turning off replies and “hiding”’” those who had already commented, including one who paid tribute to the aforementioned protests.

Others noted the division the symbols caused, while questioning whether it was an essential use of taxpayer funds.

They are poignant points which carry over to the United States too. Not everyone agrees with the idea of pride month, even if they are happy to accept others for who they are.

Perhaps the Fredericton video highlights the problem: such murals are nothing more than the performance known as virtue signaling, and that’s what frustrates people most.

LGBTQ+, Sports

Common Sense Returns: Man Disqualified from Women’s Olympic Swimming

/

Gays Against Groomers is a fairly new organization made up of homosexuals who push back against modern gender ideology. They don’t want to see children psychologically and physically abused by the deranged idea that they can be born in the wrong body and “fixed” by mutilating surgery.

GAG has been on top of breaking developments in what we might call the Gender Wars. “Lia” Thomas is one of those.

Thomas, whose real name is William, has been masquerading as a woman for several years. A mediocre swimmer in the men’s division, Thomas decided to put on a ladies’ one-piece swimsuit and compete in his “true” gender. He’s “won” swim meet after swim meet, taking prizes away from the women who rightly won them. Amazingly, the NCAA nominated him for a “woman of the year” award.

See if you can spot the male in this picture of “Lia”:

Will’s dreams of grift are coming to an end, though. Courtesy GAG:

A series of decisions from inter-sports courts has ruled that Will cannot compete as a woman, and this has disqualified him from competing in the upcoming Olympics as a female (because he’s not one).

It’s astonishing how long this make-believe farce has gone on. Who could have predicted we’d live in an age when men simply declare that they are women, and the world goes along with it as if it weren’t insane?

The recent ruling against Will Thomas is giving people hope that the magical spell of “gender” might be close to breaking:

“Phantammeron” asks the obvious question:

User Kyle Schumman points out what we all suspect is the real motivation behind cheats like Thomas:

“Bunny” points out that Thomas does not deserve to keep the trophies he “won.”

Of course, there are always trans-identified people who get very angry when someone points out that the emperor is naked:

Do you think the transgender craze is coming to an end? Tell us in the comments what you think the future holds for this loony agenda!

LGBTQ+

“Homophobic” Road Signs Removed From Los Angeles Neighborhood

/

Woke extremists are celebrating after “homophobic” street signs were removed from a Los Angeles neighborhood.

And by “homophobic street signs,” I mean “street signs.”

The signs in Silver Lake were apparently put up in the 1990s to prevent gay men from hanging around a residential area following complaints from residents. They included “No Cruising” and “No U-Turns” signs which would somehow prevent homosexuals from hooking up.

Some of the “No Cruising” signs were removed in 2011, according to NBC Los Angeles. However, after Los Angeles City Councilmember Nithya Raman heard about the signs on a podcast, she collaborated with fellow Councilmember Hugo Soto-Martinez to remove the remainder in a “bureaucratic process” which is reported to have taken months.

“Here in Silver Lake, cruising, of course, meant something very different. It meant an opportunity for the LGBT community to try to find human connection and intimacy and to be able to express themselves in a society at the time that was not very welcoming to the LGBT community,” Soto-Martinez said.

Another Silver Lake councilmember, who goes by the name “Maebe A. Girl”, expressed surprise that the signs had not been removed despite “the history of it”.

This major step towards greater tolerance and respect for one another (just kidding) sparked widespread ridicule from users on the social media platform X.

It’s unclear how lifting a ban on U-turns will improve the lives of the local gay community, but campaigners can finally relax now that Los Angeles is a safer place.

Some also raised the question as to what would happen if the change in traffic regulations caused more accidents in the area.

Which traffic signs, if any, do you believe infringe on your civil liberties? Let us know in the comments below.

LGBTQ+

Would Mr. Rogers Be Canceled Today? This Resurfaced Clip Suggests So

/

Wokespy can reveal that beloved children’s television star Fred Rogers has a secret history of blatant transphobia and misgendering. Going viral is an unearthed clip of Mr. Rogers causing direct harm to gender-non-conforming children with a shocking tirade of heteronormative dog whistles.

And by “blatant transphobia,” “misgendering,”and a “shocking tirade of hetronormative dog whistles,” we mean “common sense.”

Watch for yourself:

In an era where seemingly no one is safe from cancel culture, how insane is it that even Mr. Rogers wouldn’t be exempt if he were alive today? (Hopefully too many liberals don’t see the above clip, or they’ll give cancelation a try regardless!)

Rogers, who would be under scrutiny for his status as a Presbyterian minister by leftists today, can be seen and heard on camera using supposedly “outdated terms and concepts” (to crazy people) as he talks directly to children. Or as a leftist might put it; using a television sound stage designed to appeal to kids through toys and an indoor trolley train, Rogers masks his bigoted gender gatekeeping behind a mild-mannered tone.

For any liberals reading this, consider this your “content warning” (for anyone out of the loop, the original term “trigger warnings” has been deemed triggering to victims of gun violence – I wish I was making this up). Here an unfiltered transcription of the biological reali—errr-transphobia their children may face if exposed to Rogers and his “neighborhood.”

Set to a musical accompaniment, the be-sweatered preacher sing-speaks the following statements:

“Boys are boys from the beginning”

“If you were born a boy you stay a boy”

“Girls are girls right from the start; if you were born a girl, you stay a girl and grow up to be a lady”

He then states, in comments that leftists would consider misogyny and binary gender-policing: “Only girls can be the mommy, and only boys can be the daddy.”

Reaction on X/Twitter was on the side of common sense – but maybe that’s just because not enough leftists had seen the video yet.

Wokespy contacted Rogers for comment, but the cemetery did not immediately return calls.


LGBTQ+

LGBT Group Even Crazier Than “Queers for Palestine” Spawns

/

A protest in favor of a terrorist organization which persecutes homosexuals has received support from homosexuals.

Saturday, June 8, saw yet another pro-Palestine demonstration in front of the White House, where protesters have been congregating over Israel’s war against the militant group Hamas in the Gaza Strip. Support for Palestine is synonymous with left-wing groups who have been rampant in opposition to Israel’s response to the killing of more than 1,000 festivalgoers on October 7.

While groups like “Queers for Palestine” have been ruthlessly mocked over the years, another pro-Palestine LGBT group decided to step up the crazy one step further. In one video of the event, members of a group calling themselves “F*gs 4 Hamas” apparently now exists.

Hamas’ treatment of homosexuals has long been criticized by the West, with reports of executions simply for someone being gay.

The contradictory nature of homosexuals supporting Hamas is astoundingly baffling, particularly given that the terrorist organization is at war with one of the few accepting nations in the Middle East. Homosexuality is illegal in the Gaza Strip, and Hamas has executed one of their own top commanders after he was accused of having gay sex. Documents that Israel recently found in Gaza back in April also documents that Hamas tortures its own members suspected of being gay.

Social media users were quick to point out the bizarre one-way support for the terrorist regime.

Many raised the idea of sending such groups over to Palestine so they can see the views on their way of life firsthand.

Likewise, others drew lighthearted comparisons given the absurd nature of such support.

Such protests may not last forever though, with increased optimism over a potential conclusion to the conflict. A peace deal – in which hostages will be returned in exchange for a gradual withdrawal from Gaza by the Israeli Defense Force – was backed by the U.N. Security Council on Monday, June 10.


Subscribe Form

© 2025 WokeSpy All Rights Reserved

Scroll to Top