LGBTQ+

LGBTQ+

Canadian Father “Billboard Chris” Arrested By Australian Police for Sign Against Child Abuse

/

We’ve long used the phrase “through the looking glass” to describe times when people or whole societies seem to lose their rational minds. But what we’re seeing today, in 2025, is far more bizarre and disturbing than any other social hysteria any of us have seen in living memory. We’re not just through the looking glass, we’re through it, and someone shattered it behind us. It may not be possible to get back. 

On March 26, a Canadian father named Chris Elston was arrested by Australian police in a mall. Known online as “Billboard Chris,” Elston has been on a one-man crusade to educate the public on the horrific child abuse that we call “gender-affirming care” for so-called “transgender kids.” It’s crazy enough that any sane adult believes there are actually children who need sex changes, but what’s worse is that most people don’t know what this “affirming care” actually is. 

Giving “puberty blockers” to kids doesn’t just “pause” puberty. It causes permanent damage, bone density loss, and more. Then, when the kid goes on to take hormones designed for the opposite sex, the child is permanently sterlized. For life. They will never have children. They won’t even be able to have an orgasm. Ever. And all that is before the poor child is surgically mutilated to remove breasts or genitals. 

Why was Elston arrested? For standing in a mall, silently, wearing a sign that reads, “children cannot consent to puberty blockers.” Remember that all government institutions in Western countries are completely captured by transgender ideology. They’re quite literally religious zealots who would see people like Elston actually burned at the stake (yes, I mean executed) if they could get away with it. 

Elston’s X/Twitter account describes what happened:

From the account:

“A Canadian father who campaigns against irreversible gender dysphoria treatments for children has been fined and arrested in Brisbane, in what has been described as a “worrying attack on freedom of expression”.

Chris Elston – better known online as Billboard Chris – was standing in Queen Street Mall with a sign stating “children cannot consent to puberty blockers” when he was approached by a Brisbane City Council worker who accused him of obstructing people’s movement.

The council worker went on to issue Mr Elston with an $806 fine for “obstructing or unreasonably disturbing any person lawfully using a mall”, a claim the activist calmly insisted was untrue.”

Here’s where it gets truly chilling. In Australia, puberty blockers and similar treatments are banned by law for children. The police arrested Elston for criticizing a form of child abuse that Australian law itself makes illegal!

Here’s a sample of the online reaction: 

What do citizens of Western countries do when their own government and police are targeting them and their children?

LGBTQ+, Race

You Don’t Own Me-Democrat Mainstays Break Away

/

♫You don’t own me
I’m not just one of your many toys

Lesley Gore’s 1963 anthem of independence could be their theme song. Who? The people you’d never expect to be stumping for right-wing politics, the “demographics,” as we call them today, that everyone assumes are leftists for life.

Gays and blacks. Have you noticed how many more of each are “coming out” as conservatives? 

Check out this young black woman who goes by Michelle Monique. One hopes her outspoken condemnation of the Democratic Party throws some fear into their hearts:

From the reactions to her video, a lot of Americans are glad to see it. 

There’s evidence all over social media of a defection of liberal mainstays to the right of the aisle. People are saying it themselves under their own names, on camera. 

But finding out just how many “leftists for life” have gone to the right is trickier. For blacks, we have some reasonably good data. Polling works to figure out how many blacks have shifted from the Democrat to the Republican party, because “blacks” are a discrete category. Everyone knows what a black person is. But it’s not the same when you try to figure out how many homosexuals have fallen off the leftist wagon and jumped on the Trump train. 

Why? Because of the phrase “LGBTQ+.” Let me explain. The initialism stands for:

Lesbian
Gay
Bisexual
Trans
Queer
(who the hell knows what +means)

That’s not a discrete category. It’s a mashed-together, artificial jumble of disparate kinds of people who share nothing in common that would legitimately make them part of the same demographic. Homosexuals (and bisexuals) are attracted to the same sex. They are not whatever “trans” is. Homosexuals don’t claim to be born in the wrong body. They don’t claim to be a biological sex they are not. And a growing number (your correspondent is one of them) want the “trans and queer” out of our demographic category. 

This is an example of “forced teaming.” That’s a manipulation tactic that deceptive people use in order to falsely convince the targets of their con that their marks are on the same team with the very people trying to take advantage of them. 

But because society has swallowed the idea of “LGBTQ+”, pollsters no longer measure the homosexual vote. Gays are mashed in with the insane men in dresses and women with beards, giving the public the false impression that every gay person is interchangeable with people who slice off their genitals and want your kids to do the same. 

You may find this guy even more surprising, but he’s not the only gay guy who thinks this way. Young Link Lauren is a social media “influencer,” but from the conservative side of the aisle. He’s a frequent guest commentator on The Megyn Kelly Show, and he spares no Democrat’s feelings. Effeminate though he may be, the Dems he lambastes are more limp-wristed by far. 

Link gives a boost to the return of masculine decision-making in politics:

Most responses are welcoming:

But not everyone’s picking up what Link is laying down. You can’t win ‘em all!

LGBTQ+

Democrats Start “Informal Conversations” on Transgender Issues, Suggest Pretending to Welcome a “Range of Thoughts”

/

Democrats are beginning to address their radical transgender policy which is in direct conflict with over three-quarters of American voters.

According to a New York Times/Ipsos Survey, 79% of Americans, including 67% of Democrats say that transgender athletes should not be allowed in women’s sports. Similarly, 71% of Americans, including 54% of Democrats, oppose transgender care such as puberty-blocking drugs and hormone therapy for children under 18 years.

However, when the House passed the bill to ban transgender athletes in women’s sports, only three Democrats crossed party lines, demonstrating the party’s unwillingness to respect the will of most American voters.

Surprisingly, Rep. Sarah McBride, the first openly transgender member of Congress and a vocal trans activist has called for dialog over trans issues. “We have to create more space in our tent. If, for instance, we want to have a majoritarian coalition — not just electorally, but specifically on issues around trans rights — that, by necessity, is going to have to include people who have a range of thoughts,” McBride told NOTUS.

The transgender U.S. Representative also said that going “all in” or against trans rights was unhelpful and risked losing votes, general support, and progress. “A binary choice between being all-on or all-off is not constructive for anyone,” McBride added. “It impedes the very needed path toward winning electorally, winning hearts and minds and, most importantly, winning progress.”

The member of Congress also opposed excommunicating party members who refused to toe the line on various issues, including trans rights. “I think it is an incredibly problematic instinct that many have to excommunicate people who aren’t in lockstep with you on every policy, or even aren’t in lockstep with you on the messaging,” McBride said.

Bear in mind, if Democrats do shift their rhetoric on trans issues, and do start opposing things like men in womens’ sports, they’re just pretending.

Regardless, given how dogmatic the Democratic Party is over the trans issue, it is unlikely that they could reach a middle ground.

Rep. Greg Landsman also disclosed that Democrats were having informal conversations over the issue. Suggesting that the blue party should be more open-minded, Rep. Landsman also acknowledged “that Democrats could be a little judgy and annoying” about trans rights. 

Rightly so, several Democrats have faced backlash after expressing contradicting opinions. Recently, California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) came under fire after correctly stating that allowing trans athletes in women’s sports is “deeply unfair.” 

“I think it’s an issue of fairness. I completely agree with you on that,” Newsom told conservative figure Charlie Kirk. “It is an issue of fairness, it’s deeply unfair. We’ve got to own that. We’ve got to acknowledge it.”

His remarks also caused a storm in his political backyard, with California’s LGBT caucus saying it was deeply sickened by the statement.

“We woke up profoundly sickened and frustrated by these remarks.”

The 2028 potential Democratic Party’s flagbearer also said the party’s position on gender politics contributed to Kamala Harris’ crushing defeat by Donald Trump. He also lamented Harris’ unwillingness to address the issue.

“It was devastating,” Newsom said. “And she didn’t even react to it, which was even more devastating.” 

Earlier, Reps. Seth Moulton (D-MA-6) and Tom Suozzi (D-NY-3) also faced backlash after suggesting that the party had gone too far on the trans issue. Moulton had warned that Democrats were afraid of honestly addressing issues that affect American voters.

“Democrats spend way too much time trying not to offend anyone rather than being brutally honest about the challenges many Americans face,” Moulton told the New York Times.  “I have two little girls. I don’t want them getting run over on a playing field by a male or formerly male athlete, but as a Democrat, I’m supposed to be afraid to say that.” 

But don’t forget, Moulton was one of 224 co-sponsors of the Equality Act that would have added “gender identity” as a protected class to all relevant civil rights statutes

Rep. Souzzi also stated that the Democratic party was pandering to the extreme left, leaving many leaders afraid to speak out. “The Democrats have to stop pandering to the far left,” Suozzi told the New York Times. “I don’t want to discriminate against anybody, but I don’t think biological boys should be playing in girls’ sports. 

“Democrats aren’t saying that, and they should be,” said the former County Executive of Nassau County.

Left-wing extremism, LGBTQ+

Hemorrhaging Sponsors: Bud Light & Budweiser Parent Company Anheuser-Busch Withdraws San Francisco Pride Sponsorship

/

Bud Light and Budweiser parent company Anheuser-Busch has canceled the San Francisco Pride (SF Pride) sponsorship citing financial constraints. 

Ranked as the largest LGBTQ+ event in the world attracting over 1 million participants, the San Francisco Pride will take place between June 28 and June 29, 2025, in California’s fourth-largest city. This year’s theme is “Queer Joy is Resistance” in the face of Trump’s onslaught on the radical woke ideology.

The beer brand lost over $27 billion after partnering with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney to celebrate “365 days of girlhood,” resulting in a conservative boycott that wiped out 30% of the company’s customers. Meanwhile, the San Francisco Pride continues to hemorrhage sponsors resulting in the loss of over $300,000 in funding out of the remaining $1.3 million after five sponsors pulled out. While the event’s overall funding goal is $2.3 million, SF Pride already has over $1 million committed.

The massive pullout occurred hot on the heels of various companies ditching woke policies including diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) hiring standards that prioritize race, gender, and sexual orientation. Besides Anheuser-Busch, other companies pulling out of the SF Pride include Comcast, Benefit Cosmetics, and Diageo, a British producer of popular alcoholic brands such as Smirnoff, Johnny Walker, Guinness, and La Crema wine. However, La Crema said it had not entirely ditched the LGBTQ+ community and hoped to partner with the SF Pride organizers in some limited capacity.

The San Francisco Pride also cut ties with Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp parent company Meta over its decision to ditch censorship and DEI hiring policies. Earlier this year, Meta removed tampons and other female sanitary products from men’s bathrooms, resulting in pro-transgender silent protests. Lamenting the pullout, SF Pride’s executive director, Suzanne Ford described the withdrawals were “very abnormal,” suggesting that companies were steadily shifting their priorities.

“I just interpreted that companies are making decisions that at this time it’s not good to be sponsoring Pride,” Ford told SFGATE. “I think in this political environment that they thought that was a risky decision. But that’s just me reading the tea leaves. I think for a long-term sponsor not to sponsor us, they are responding to what we are.”

In the present “return to common sense” era under President Trump, Ford inadvertently pointed out that becoming involved with radical woke policies was a risky business decision. However, she blamed the Trump administration for allegedly putting pressure on companies. 

“I’m very concerned. Obviously, there’s pressure from the federal government,” Ford told a Fox News affiliate KTVU.

“The tone has changed in this country. Businesses already hedge their bets, and I think people who, this isn’t their hard core value of their corporation, maybe they’re rethinking their investment.”

Nonetheless, Ford said the event would proceed as planned as they would look for new sponsors although its future was bleak. Ford also warned that many small businesses that benefitted from SF Pride would be significantly affected.

“The whole world will be watching to see if San Francisco still has those values. That they can come here and live their authentic lives,” Ford added.

In January, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to terminate DEI policies across the federal government in hiring, contracting, and spending. While U.S. District Judge Adam Abelson in Baltimore blocked the order, a three-bench appeals bench lifted the injunction allowing the policy to proceed.

LGBTQ+

Trump Freezes $175 Million in Federal Funding to University of Pennsylvania for Including a Trans Athlete

/

The Trump administration has blocked the University of Pennsylvania from receiving $175 million in federal funding over its policy allowing transgender athletes to compete in women’s sports. The funding freeze was not related to the independent investigation by the Department of Education into potential violation of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 Act that prohibits sex-based discrimination in education programs and activities that receive federal funding.

However, the university has not received any notification about the funding freeze and claims to have fully complied with the NCAA’s updated guidelines on the participation of transgender athletes in women’s sports.

“We are aware of media reports suggesting a suspension of $175 million in federal funding to Penn, but have not yet received any official notification or any details,” a UPenn spokesperson told Fox Business which first reported the funding freeze.

“It is important to note, however, that Penn has always followed NCAA and Ivy League policies regarding student participation on athletic teams. We have been in the past, and remain today, in full compliance with the regulations that apply to not only Penn, but all of our NCAA and Ivy League peer institutions.”

Recently, Trump’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) found that the Maine Department of Education, the Maine Principals’ Association, and Greely High School violated Title IX by allowing a transgender teen to compete against girls in a track and field event. The Trump administration had also directed the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to halt federal funding for the University of Maine System (UMS) after the state’s politicians vowed to ignore the President’s trans policy. The funding freeze was later reversed after RINO Republican Senator Susan Collins intervened and negotiated with the Trump administration.

San Jose State University and Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Association are also under investigation for allowing transgender athletes to compete against women. San Jose State University made headlines after including a transgender player on its volleyball team, prompting several female teams to refuse to play. In 2022, Payton McNabb was severely injured after a transgender volleyball player spiked a ball in her head, resulting in traumatic brain injuries. Subsequently, their boycott could be perceived as a security measure to avoid potential severe injuries.

In the same year, UPenn included a transgender athlete Lia Thomas, who proceeded to win the national championship in women’s 500-yard freestyle. By October 2024, transgender athletes had won over 900 medals across 400 events in 29 sports, displacing over 600 biological female athletes. The Trump administration has been requested to investigate an Illinois school district after a mother reported that her 13-year-old was forced to change in front of a transgender athlete. According to the girl’s mother, she was told that the biological male student could use the bathroom because now he identifies as a female.

The following day, the girls reportedly refused to change during physical education because the transgender student was present. However, the school’s assistant administrator, the principal, and several teachers entered the girls’ locker room and forced them to change in front of the transgender student. Meanwhile, Illinois Democrat state representative Bob Morgan accused the teenage girl of lying and lauded the people “who stood up for those who need to be defended and protected” referring to the transgender student.

LGBTQ+

Congressional Transvestite Calls Republicans “Weird”

/

Imagine you’re at a bar at 2 pm. You’ve never been there, and you see that the bar is full of regulars who appear to know each other. They seem affable, but you know you’re the new guy, and you’re walking into their territory. It’s up to you to fit in with the crowd, not the other way around. 

The main guy doing all the talking points out the window to the parking lot. Since it’s mid-afternoon, the sun is blazing down on the cars. But he says, “Man, it’s getting darker and darker as summer comes on. By tomorrow it’s going to be impossible to find your car without a flashlight by the time 3 o’clock rolls around.” Everyone at the bar agrees, and many chip in with stories about how they stubbed their toes or twisted their ankles trying to pick their way through the darkness of full summer sun when they were kids. 

I know what you’re thinking, reader. You’re thinking you’d immediately recognize that they were all suffering from a mass delusion, and you’d leave.

Not so fast. There’s a very good chance you’d start questioning your own sanity. Is he right? Does the sun make it dark outside, and you’ve been misled your whole life? After all, everybody else at the bar agrees; what if it’s me who’s crazy? 

This is how the “reversal” or the “big lie” works. If you tell the opposite of the truth with enough conviction, and with a show of social solidarity on your side, you absolutely can convince normal, sane people to disbelieve their own eyes and start questioning their sanity. 

Transgenderism got as far as it did in society because it uses the reversal, the big lie. It brazenly claims that men are women, and acts genuinely shocked when you disagree. People are so stunned by this that they stay silent, and then, person by person, they start agreeing. 

Yesterday we brought you a story about Democrat House member Bill Keating losing his composure and shouting at committee chairman Ken Self because Self correctly referred to another lawmaker as “Mr. McBride.” He was referring to “Sarah” (nee Tim) McBride, a male representative from Delaware who wears dresses and calls himself a woman. The big reversal worked on Rep. Keating, who seemed genuinely emotionally triggered and angry that anyone could call the obvious male McBride an obvious male. He was offended and personally upset by a statement of reality. 

Today, the day after the incident, McBride is working the big lie/reversal as hard as possible. And it works on anyone who’s on the left. True to narcissistic form, he spoke at a press conference about how people who won’t call men women are “weird” and obsessed with “weird” issues. Yes, it’s brazen, and that’s why it works. 

Complete with valley girl vocal fry, and “on point” with au courant phrases—”I appear to live rent-free in the minds of some of my Republican colleagues”—McBride managed to reverse the truth about just who is “weird” and it got the approval of his Democrat colleagues. 

Let’s see what people on X/Twitter had to say. 

Hmm. Sentiment seems to be running against Tim McBride. 

This one is QED. 

Left-wing extremism, LGBTQ+

Democrat Melts Down When Committee Chair Won’t Call a Man “She”

/

Parenting guides have been published for at least several hundred years in the West, full of advice on everything from diet, to curing colic, to whether and how to “sleep train” a baby. But we need a guide for how to parent adult babies, otherwise known as Democratic lawmakers. So far, the only option most people can think of to deal with the left’s temper tantrums is to let them cry it out. 

And oh, are they crying it out. The sour faces, heckling, shouting, and infantile signs—”Musk Steals!”—of the Democrat half of the Senate during President Trump’s first address to a joint session of Congress was the most immature display in politics in living memory. Even the lunatic-left Washington Post acknowledged it, though in the gentlest possible language, calling the party’s behavior a “low ebb.”

Transgender ideology, even more than shoveling endless billions to Ukraine, seems to be the issue that brings your average Democrat to hysteria quicker than anything else. Republican Representative Keith Self of Texas learned this when he referred to another male member of the House as  “Mr. McBride.” Self’s colleague, Massachusetts Democrat Bill Keating, jerked like a dog on a chain and started barking at Rep. Self. 

Why? Because Self referred to “Mr. McBride.” The Democratic Representative from Delaware is a man formerly known as Tim McBride who now calls himself Sarah McBride, and tells the world that he is a woman. 

McBride immediately referred to Chairman Self as “Madam Chair” right back, I guess in an attempt to “show him what misgendering feels like.” It doesn’t make much sense, because McBride was being correctly gendered the whole time.

Bill Keating didn’t think that McBride could defend himself, apparently, and rushed in like a knight errant to defend the “lady’s” honor. “Would you repeat what you just  said,” he asked Rep. Self in an outraged voice. 

Representative Keating got even more emotional, pulling a McCarthy-hearing-moment on Self, spluttering, “have you no decency?” and telling the chairman that he was “out of order” and that he, Keating, would not be participating in any hearing until Self agreed to call McBride a woman. 

Check it out:

Self’s response was a gavel bang along with “This meeting is adjourned.”

Let’s see how X/Twitter users saw it. 

LGBTQ+

Deranged Trannies Target Female Victim of Trans Abuse

/

We talk about Trump Derangement Syndrome in a comical way, usually. Oh, we mean it. People who exhibit TDS really do seem deranged, but we often toss that label off laughingly. These people aren’t really crazy, are they? 

Yes, I think they are. But not “crazy” in the way we usually think of when we think of mental illness. These people are not suffering from schizophrenic hallucinations. They’re not manic depressives off their medication, blowing their life savings on a gambling or shopping binge. It’s not that kind of crazy. 

It’s worse. 

Look at the behavior of the entire Democratic Senate during Trump’s address to Congress. Every single one of them refused to stand or applaud for a 13-year-old boy with brain cancer who was honored with a membership in the Secret Service. We’ve never seen anything like this before in modern times. 

Look at the scowling leftist women bedecked in pink “for women” who voted, every last one of them, against a bill to protect girls from the invasion of privacy and the danger of being hurt by “trans girls” (boys and men) playing on their sports teams. That’s right. The “feminists” voted against protecting girls from larger, stronger boys in school sports. 

This is a kind of “crazy” that’s not normal mental illness. In my opinion, a great number of these deranged leftists have something called a Cluster B personality disorder. You know these “disorders” by common names like pathological narcissism, emotional instability (borderline personality disorder), and psychopathy. 

I think we’re seeing this kind of character disorder in the video I’m going to show below. It features a woman and a man (he wears makeup and claims to be a woman) who are lying about and publicly abusing Payton McNabb. McNabb is the young woman who was severely injured in a high school volleyball competition because a strong young man calling himself a “trans girl” was allowed to play as a girl. He spiked the ball into McNabb’s face so hard she is left with partial paralysis on her right side. 

Here’s the video with the woman and the “trans woman.” They target McNabb, and call her a “perpetrator” because McNabb filmed a “trans woman” barging into the ladies’ bathroom. You know, that place where men don’t belong. For her “sin,” McNabb has now been kicked out of her sorority. 

Payton McNabb herself shared the video on her X/Twitter feed. 

Take a good look and listen to these two. The vocal fry, the mannerisms, the smirking stare into the camera by this deranged man. In my view, you’re looking at serious personality disorders in these people, and in the people who share their views. Something is desperately morally wrong with grown men putting on makeup and targeting young women for shame, and calling them “perpetrators”, because these young women are objecting to actual abuse. 

Here’s what X/Twitter users had to say:

Woke Spy readers, I usually write in a light or sarcastic tone of voice, but in this article I’m giving it to you straight. I have unfortunate personal, family, and professional experience with people who have these personality and character disorders. They are not merely and only irritating or obnoxious, they are often very dangerous. Look for the signs, and watch your back.

LGBTQ+

Wisconsin Triples Down on Woke Insanity

/

“Hey there, little birthing person. How would you like to take a ride in my ‘vette to paradise?”

Sound romantic? No, it doesn’t. But if you’re leftist and woke, that’s the kind of language the pure and morally correct think you should be using to describe the people in your family. See, the left has decided a bunch of contradictory things about the birds and the bees. To be a good leftist comrade, you must somehow reconcile these things in your head:

  1. Trans women (men) are women, and trans men (women) are men. 
  2. Biological sex isn’t real. At best, it’s some kind of gray spectrum. 

As the “Human Rights Campaign” insists, “When we say women, that word always includes trans women. There’s no ifs, ands or buts about it. A woman’s gender identity is her innermost concept of being female. A trans woman’s gender identity doesn’t define or caveat her womanhood, it simply describes her journey to womanhood.”

Didja hear that, bigots? Men in pantyhose are women because we say so. To underline the point, they included a demonstration photo of a “transgender woman” who is absolutely in every way a woman. 

If you think you’re seeing a male brow ridge and facial structure, and if you go even farther and think you’re seeing a man, that just shows how sexist and transphobic you are. Is that clear? 

While the normal majority in America is rejecting the culture-wide psychotic delusion called “transgender ideology” that we’ve all been living under since at least 2015, the blue states are holding out. They don’t seem to grasp yet that they’re tilting at windmills, and one of those wind blades is going to come crashing down on their lunatic project sooner than they think. 

Last week Maine’s leftist governor Janet Mills grabbed her “girlboss moment” telling President Trump to his face that Maine had no intention of following his lawful executive order. That order instructed states to stop allowing boys and men into girls’ and womens’ sports immediately, or lose all federal funding. Mills’ response? “See you in court.” 

Trump’s response? “I look forward to that. This should be a real easy one.”

Now, Wisconsin has decided that humans are no longer to be described in human terms. In legislation related to the 2025-2027 budget, lawmakers are recommending removing all references to husbands, wives, and pregnancy, and replacing them with. . .I don’t know what you’d call this. 

—Remove wife/husband, and substitute “spouse.”

—Remove the word mother, and substitute “inseminated person.”

—Remove the word “paternity,” and substitute the word “patronage. 

That last one is so stupid it must be underlined. The root Latin word that both “paternity” and “patronage” come from is the same! It’s a masculine word, “paternus,”  that means “of or relating to a father.” Why is “patronage,” then, better than “paternity?” Because the goal isn’t to be “respectful of people with other gender identities.” The goal is to dehumanize people and control the rest of us through enforced sterile, inaccurate, and insane language. They love doing this. 

Both LibsOfTikTok and Elon Musk himself could barely believe it. 

Let’s see what ordinary American bigots on X/Twitter thought. 

Eamon is right on the nose. 

Entertainment, LGBTQ+

Trump Puts Lib Maine Gov in Her Place to Her Face Over Trans in Women’s Sports

/

Open defiance of the federated system of power in the United States has become surprisingly popular among Democrat states recently. You would think that the governors and legislatures of blue states were not aware of the Supremacy Clause in the Constitution. Article VI, Clause 2, establishes that when federal and state laws conflict, federal law comes out on top. The blue states know this, of course, it’s just that they’ve been allowed to get away with openly violating the Constitution and defying the federal government for years under the prior Biden administration. 

So-called “sanctuary” cities and states are the preeminent example. These states and cities have opened their borders to illegal aliens in defiance of federal law. They refuse to cooperate with federal immigration officials, they won’t turn over illegals that the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) division has marked for deportation, and they won’t give the feds information. It’s incredibly brazen, but it’s become normalized since the Biden administration itself was violating federal law by ushering in at least 10 million illegals itself. 

With the appointment of Tom Homan to oversee the border crisis, the Trump administration has made it clear that defying federal law won’t be tolerated. After New Jersey Governor Chris Murphy openly dared the feds to come find an apparent illegal living in his garage apartment, Homan made it clear that he absolutely will arrest and prosecute public officials who harbor illegals. 

But the message is taking a while to sink in to other Democrat governors. Janet Mills is the governor of Maine, a state that is hell-bent on allowing boys and men to compete in girls’ and women’s sports as part of their addiction to give so-called “transgender women” anything they want regardless of the costs to women and girls. Trump has made it clear in executive orders that states that continue this nonsense can expect all their federal funding to dry up. 

During a live meeting, Trump called Mills out from the podium, asking her if her state would comply. She refused, and Trump laid down the law calmly and firmly. “Well you better do it because you’re not going to get any federal funding if you don’t.” Liberal women are used to being able to defy any rules they don’t like, and Mills shot back, “See you in court.” 

Trump’s response? “Good, I’ll see you in court. I look forward to that; that should be a real easy one.”

Watch:

X/Twitter users were impressed. 

Washington resident Naomi shot a warning to her own state’s politicians that they can probably expect the same:

At least one person would dearly love to see “leaders” like Maine’s governor in the slammer. 


Subscribe Form

© 2025 WokeSpy All Rights Reserved

Scroll to Top