LGBTQ+

When parents think of sending a daughter off to college, they usually have some concerns for her safety. University years are often filled with drink, drugs, and partying, and even “good girls” can find themselves caught up in a youth lifestyle that can lead to bad outcomes. 

One of the ways young women and their parents have traditionally tried to increase safety in college is by choosing female-only dormitories. These have been widely available at U.S. colleges for decades. But in the age of “trans” where everyone gets to simply assert what sex they are and be treated as if the statement were true, there’s nowhere for young women to get away from men in their living spaces. It’s impossible to find out how many schools actually respect single-sex living quarters, but this “queer” organization, Campus Pride, gleefully reports that 470 U.S. colleges offer “gender-inclusive housing.”

That’s what one mom just found out when she sent her daughter to Utah State University to stay in the Merrill Hall dormitory. Though it is not clear from the University’s website whether Merrill Hall is officially “co-ed,” mother Cheryl Saltzman believed it was a women’s-only living space. If you try to search for this information, all you get from the University’s website is a proud declaration that “gender-inclusive housing is available in Wasatch Hall.”

The whole statement is nauseating enough to reprint here in the original Wokeish: “Utah State University is committed to making each resident feel welcomed and included in our campus communities, particularly through room options welcoming to all gender identities, expressions and preferences.”

Here’s what welcomed Saltzman’s daughter when she moved into what she thought was a girls-only dorm:

That’s “Marcie.” Brace for it: “Marcie” is the “Dorm Mom.”

X commentator Eric Moutsous has more details. You won’t be surprised to learn that “Marcie’s” mother thinks it’s just fine and dandy, saying only that she wanted other students and parents to be “comfortable” with her son living among the girls. Young men from stable families rarely put on what looks like a teddy and label themselves a “girl.”

Mother Cheryl Saltzman’s posted her account of the situation in a Facebook post, reading:

A biological male (trans with she/her pronouns) just moved into my daughter’s dorm (Merrill hall) on Utah State university’s campus… it is a girls only dorm

The woman I called was impatient with me…

You can move into the dorm with the gender that you identify, I did read that last night in the contract. However the contempt toward anyone uncomfortable with it, is genuinely and deeply enraging

UPDATE: they immediately gave her two apartment options and she chose one. She will move tomorrow… Anyway told the girl that was going to be her roommate and move in tomorrow about the situation so she wasn’t blindsided… So 😔 … and I’m still ticked that she has to move because of this

Naturally, Saltzman’s daughter has to move. But the young man claiming to be a girl—you can take one look at him and see he’s a creep—gets to stay. Trans gets what trans wants no matter what.

Here’s what X/Twitter users had to say. 

Take a look at this individual:

What do you see? If you’re like most people, you probably see someone who looks male with long hair, but “most people” also aren’t willing to say that you see that in public. Noticing real things, such as the obvious sex of other people, has been forbidden since about 2014 when Time Magazine put a transvestite on the cover and told us that trans activism was the “next civil rights frontier.”

The man in the photo is Christopher Scott Williams, a transgender “woman” (male) that was placed in a women’s prison – only to then predictably sexually assault his female cellmate. The inmate is now suing the State Department of Corrections.

That’s right. This man convicted of child molestation was placed in a women’s prison. If that shocks you, you have not been reading the news. For at least 10 years in America and other Western countries, woke prison officials have decided that men who put on panties and claim to be ladies are, in fact, ladies, and should be housed with ladies. No, they apparently see no potential for violent problems. Or, probably more accurately, they know exactly what’s going to happen and they simply don’t care. 

It is impossible to know how many men are in women’s prisons, as officials are actively lying to the public and hiding reality.

In the current case, convicted child molester Williams, who claims to be a woman, got himself a nice spot in a women’s prison in Washington. An actual female inmate (she’s out now) alleges that he raped her, and she’s suing the prison. According to the Daily Mail, Williams beat a male prison guard so violently the guard lost consciousness. 

Yet, between the fact that Williams is a man and the fact that he molested children, prison officials could not see any reason at all to question the wisdom of putting a woman in a locked cell with him. When are we going to wake up from this madness? 

Here’s what X/Twitter users had to say. 

Here’s another example:

Most social media users seem to see the insanity of it all, and they’ve had enough. 

There are predators all around us. Human predators. We find it easy to recognize danger in wild animals like wolves and bears. Well, most of us do. If you’re looking for exceptions just scan the news for stories about wildlife encounters in Yellowstone National Park. Every year dozens of tourists (at least) seem to believe they’re at Yogi Bear’s Jellystone instead of the real thing. Human visitors try to get up close and personal with grizzlies and bison, and they pay the price.

But people have a much harder time recognizing predators of their own species. Despite our obsession with the true crime genre, the majority of everyday people seem largely unaware of when someone is wearing a “mask” of gentility and respectability. Predatory people try to blend in with “normies” for obvious reasons: it’s easier to snare a target who can’t see them coming. Serial rapist and killer Ted Bundy crafted his image with the use of props to appear unthreatening to his female targets; he drove a VW bug, which was supposed to make people think he was a “square” who liked sensible and economical cars. You know, like a professor. He also hobbled around on fake crutches, like a bird feigning a broken wing. 

Socially predatory people have found a boon in the modern transgender mania. Men who are up to no good figured out that they can fool plenty of people—particularly empathetic women—into believing they’re soft and gentle by wearing makeup and acting in a way that they think makes them appear feminine and non-dangerous. 

Take trans activist Jeffrey Marsh. He wears sparkly makeup and talks in a simpering, lispy falsetto when he records his seemingly endless social media messages about “trans rights” and what terrible bigots parents are who don’t accept their child’s declaration of being born in the wrong body. Indeed, he’s very, very keen to talk to such children alone without their parents’ knowledge. 

Marsh clearly believes that his sparkle-uncle-aunt-drag routine will lull the gullible into thinking of him as safe and warm, and he’s probably right. But there’s an important lesson here: if someone goes out of their way to present themselves as loving and cuddly, it may be a disguise for less savory motivations. 

It’s impossible to tell how many people are fooled by this act, but it’s clear that many are. Take a look at one of his latest videos where he encourages people to cut off their pro-Trump family members. Marsh is adept at what’s called the “narcissistic reversal.” That’s when someone who bullies or mistreats people presents himself as the actual victim. Marsh is a master, co-opting the sensible advice about how to protect yourself from abuse and bullying by presenting himself and people like him as the victims of social bullies. 

I don’t know about you, reader, but every danger flag in my gut stands up at full-mast when I watch and listen to Marsh. Let’s see what X/Twitter users have to say. 

That last tweet was a good question. How does anyone fail to see through this?

The issue of child sex-changes is finally coming before the Supreme Court. Of course, you’ve probably not heard the procedure described that way. There’s a reason for that: Doesn’t “gender-affirming care” sound nicer? That’s what transgender activists think, and that’s why they’ve chosen a euphemism to disguise the chemical and surgical castration of minor children. 

The case before the high court is called U.S. v Skrmetti, and the court will hear oral arguments on December 4. At issue is a law in Tennessee banning so-called “gender-affirming care” for minors. The U.S. federal government is suing Tennessee. That’s right: The Biden administration wants to allow this extreme child abuse, as it has been completely captured by obviously mentally unstable activists who believe that there are children born in the wrong sex’s body. 

One of the most dangerous of these activists is a woman who calls herself “Chase Strangio” (birth name: Kate Strangio). She is a slight, thin woman who has taken hormones to give herself what she believes is the appearance of being a man. Strangio is the lead transgender lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union. The ACLU, once a free-speech organization, has been defending this kind of abuse against children for years. 

As X/Twitter commentator Brad Polumbo points out, Strangio’s extreme ideology is in fact mainstream. This is not the fringe we’re talking about. The dominant, socially acceptable position in American public life is that not only is it OK to practice chemical and genital mutilation on children, but it’s a moral imperative. Why, these children will kill themselves if they’re not allowed to become their “true gender,” according to activists. 

You have to see and hear Chase Strangio in her own words to believe them. During this spot on CNN before her upcoming argument before the court, Strangio says that children as young as two years old know “exactly who they are.” Yes, she means that actual toddlers can “know” that they’re born in the wrong body. Can they also know that they are dinosaurs or robots? 

“These are not doctors being forced to provide this medication,” Strangio said. “These are doctors who are wanting to treat their patients in the best way that they know how, based on the best available evidence to us. And these are young people who may have known since they were two years old exactly who they are, who suffered for six or seven years before they had any relief.”

Give it a watch below:

Let’s see if social media users are buying what Strangio plans to sell the court. 

How did this user figure out that Strangio is a woman? Was it the female voice coupled with the woke valley girl accent? 

This one gets right to the heart of it: