Donald Trump’s win in the 2024 presidential election prompted a whole host of totally-sane liberals to upload videos to TikTok.
Liberals were distraught at the night’s results, which saw Trump trounce Vice President Kamala Harris across the country in the greatest political comeback in American history.
The Libs of TikTok account on X (@libsoftiktok) summarized the best liberal meltdowns, beginning with one guy who is apparently a personal trainer. CJ Baker uploaded a video reacting to Trump’s win by announcing his lifelong boycott of Tesla – the car manufacturer owned by the pro-Trump Elon Musk.
The Left is losing it over Trump winning
This man is so mad he said he will never buy a Tesla. I don’t know how Elon will ever recover from this 😂 pic.twitter.com/Fkki3uzJUi
Another liberal said she was “genuinely confused” as to what happened. Spoiler alert: her candidate attempted to run a non-stop attack campaign focused on the perceived threat to democracy despite the fact that she never won a primary.
This liberal is almost in tears.
She’s confused and wants insight into how Trump won. I’ll help her out:
Another woman was bewildered that a majority of Americans chose a preferred candidate based on economic concerns over abortion. In fact, the exit poll said that the economy was a pressing issue for twice as many Americans than abortion.
Tiktoker is crying because voters chose a good economy over kiIIing babies. Very telling pic.twitter.com/KLQm0oeRds
Things took a real turn for the weird later on Wednesday, Nov. 6, when one woman – as some form of protest, one can only assume – shaved her head for TikTok.
This woman shaved her head to protest Trump’s win and to fight the patriarchy
It never ceases to amaze that these people make a conscious decision to have a meltdown, film it, and upload it to the internet. So, feel free to give them the attention they crave by sharing this article far and wide!
To live in 21st century America is to be pushed to believe in lies and to watch the societal infrastructure get pulled down by do-gooders. One of the biggest lies we’re expected to swallow is the idea that America is “systemically racist” against black people. Since the mid 2010s, and exacerbated by the death of George Floyd and the rise of Black Lives Matter, media and Democrat politicians have shouted at the top of their lungs that white people have their fellow black Americans under a crushing boot.
It’s outrageous because it’s so obviously backward. Black Americans have been raised to the status of an untouchable sacred caste while white Americans have to suffer being called racists and oppressors simply for noticing or saying “ouch” when they get mugged.
Open any social media platform, and you’ll be treated to countless videos of black mobs holding up stores, engaging in organized robbery and shoplifting, and assaulting white people with zero consequences.
The U.S. Supreme Court overturned affirmative action in colleges, but evidence suggest universities are still admitting black students who are demonstrably less qualified than white applicants. As predicted, Ivies like Cornell are getting around the ban by renaming the practice.
Somehow, the country fell asleep at the wheel and forgot everything it claimed to learn from civil rights leader Martin Luther King, who said character, not color, was what mattered. Today, our politicians and policy wonks follow the prescription of low-brow-but-popular “thinkers” like woke black radical Ibram X. Kendi, who says “The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination.”
Police departments have been gutted in cities across the country, and states like California have essentially legalized shoplifting unless it gets up to about $1,000 in value.
New York City appears to be giving up on civic law and order completely. I can barely believe I’m writing this, but I am: New York City just legalized jaywalking. Why? Because of “racial disparities.” What does that mean? It means that because black people got caught jaywalking more than other groups, that New York was “doing a racism” to them.
It’s necessary to spell it right out: you are not allowed to notice or react to black people displaying disproportionate criminality. If you do, you’re a racist. Black people are not allowed to be thought of as criminals, called criminals, or punished for criminal behavior.
The standards get lowered until they’re gone.
BREAKING: New York officially legalizes jaywalking to end "racial disparities" pic.twitter.com/Jfk3U5lNzp
Your average New Yorker is no stranger to jaywalking, which has been illegal since 1958. That’s about to change. Starting in February, New Yorkers will no longer be breaking the law when crossing the street in between traffic, and will no longer receive a fine for jaywalking.
The City Council has been working to decriminalize jaywalking, which is something nearly every New Yorker does.
“In 2023, over 92% of jaywalking citations went to Black and Latino New Yorkers, highlighting an unacceptable disparity. The bill changes that by removing criminal penalties, ensuring everyone is treated fairly, regardless of race or backgroud,” said Councilmember Mercedes Narcisse, who sponsored the legislation. “Police officers have shared with me they prefer to focus on true public safety efforts, not issuing tickets for crossing the street.”
Let’s see the reaction from X users. First up, Elon Musk himself.
Jaywalking in NY is normal, so probably shouldn’t be illegal, but that is a weird reason to make it legal
Everyone in 3rd world county jaywalks all day every day because there are no rules. It’s just mayhem, this is to accommodate the millions of illegal migrants imported by Democrats and transform our country into the poverty hell holes like the ones they came from
It’s hard to say whether the fever of “gender ideology” may finally be breaking. Ever since Time Magazine declared in 2014 on its cover that America is reaching a “Transgender tipping point,” Americans have been bombarded with gender ideology. It seems there may be some cracks forming in this lunatic consensus, but if so, it’s going to take a while for the left to abandon the ideas. More on this below.
But what is “gender ideology?” It is a constellation of ideas about sex, sexuality, humans, and “identities”, including:
The belief that biological sex is not real, but an arbitrary “choice.” No, it does not make sense, but yes, people do claim this.
The belief that every person has a “gender identity,” and that “gender identity” is completely separate from their actual sexed body. For example, a man will be said to have a “female” “gender identity.” That means that he asserts that he believes he is a woman despite the factual reality.
That a person’s “gender identity” controls whether they are male or female, with no regard to the person’s actual anatomy.
Worst, the belief that children who do not conform to sex-role expectations (e.g., “boys play rough” and “girls like pretty things”) are born in the wrong body. Therefore, a little boy who likes sparkly princess stories is “really” a girl, and he should be chemically castrated and perhaps surgically, too.
You can see what major medical institutions like the Cleveland Clinic say about “gender identity,” but be warned that allegedly scientific medical organizations are all completely captured by these magical beliefs.
Until very recently, it has been socially forbidden to observe the obvious: a person who believes they were born in the wrong body and is actually the opposite sex has mental difficulties. Refusing to call men who claim to be women “she” has resulted in countless people being fired from their jobs and called bigots, and worse.
But conservative commentator Ben Shapiro has never been afraid to speak the truth. He walked right into the lion’s den recently, participating in a Youtube show called “Surrounded.” The conceit is that a speaker sits in the middle of a room surrounded by a circle of people who get a few minutes each to debate him on issues.
That’s when this happened.
The person on the right is not a man. She very much wants you to believe she is. She’s angry that Ben Shapiro won’t tell her that she’s a man. (It’s not clear from the video what her name is). But in reality, she is a woman on testosterone who has been “living as a man.” The picture above? That’s her swaggering over and turning the chair around to plunk down in a “manly” way (note the “manspread” sitting posture).
In this short clip below, Shapiro and “Barb” debate the idea that someone can change their sex. Barb acts like a caricature of a macho bro-dude, hamming up the “masculine” mannerisms and speaking to Shapiro in a tone that sounds like she wants a fist fight.
Conservative Ben Shapiro handles a liberal tr*ns man (a woman) like a boss after she tells him “I’ve got a v*gina.” Ben: “I’m not interested in what your g*nitalia are.”
“I’m sick and tired of the s—t you have put against my community. Specifically, black tr*ns women.”
Barb: So, I’m a transgender man, I’ve experienced SA (sexual abuse), and abortion rights affect me directly. So, if we’re talking about the American dream you live, why don’t I have access to that? Because there’s no legislation in the history of America that legislates a man’s body, so why does mine have to be legislated? I have a vagina.”
No, there isn’t more context that makes the above suddenly make sense. Here’s the whole clip.
Barb wasn’t the only debate opponent who seemed, to put it generously, naïve. Here’s Ben speaking with a woman who asks, “Why does the definition of abortion have to include the death of a fetus?” Looking momentarily confused, Ben shoots back, “Because that’s literally the definition of ‘abortion’.”
You won’t be surprised to learn that his opponent does not agree.
Click below to watch the entire hour-and-forty-minute-long video, if you’re so inclined. But be prepared, the liberal stupidity truly is off the charts.
An appointee of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz’s administration called for the “overthrow” of the United States, it’s been revealed.
Brian Lozenski, a self-described critical race theorist, was appointed by Gov. Walz’s education department to write the statewide curriculum for Minnesota’s new “ethnic studies” standards.
Although the state’s “implementation framework” was earmarked for public consultation, it’s now unlikely the public will have their say before the October 31 deadline. This is despite the controversial nature of the new ethnic studies which critics have labeled “anti-American.”
In a 2022 video, Lozenski talked about the use of critical race theory in schools.
“We don’t use critical race theory in school,” said Lozenski. “The first tenet of critical race theory is that the United States as constructed is irreversibly racist. So if the nation-state as constructed is irreversibly racist, then it must be done with, it must be overthrown, right?”
Lozenski went on to say that critical race theory is beyond “telling our stories and divers[ity]”.
“t’s not about that. It’s about overthrow. It’s insurgent. And we, we need to be, I think, more honest with that,” he added.
The video has since been deleted, although a snippet was uploaded to social media leaving commentors astonished by Lozenski’s remarks.
A Democrat in Louisiana publicly encouraged the assassination attempts against Donald Trump in a live call-in with C-SPAN’s Washington Journal.
The caller named Willie, who claimed to have served in the military for over 20 years, made the comments on Wednesday, Sept. 18 in which he said he was encouraged to “destroy the enemy by all means available”.
“I see we let this man (Trump) destroy America, and I look at it and see these two people had to step up and take that shot,” he said on national television.
A stunned John McArdle interrupted Willie and asked, “I’m sorry, you’re not advocating violence, are you?”
“Not violence,” came the response, “I’m defending my country.”
Many on social media were angered by the comments which saw Willie cut off before he could advocate anything else.
Other commentors on social media alluded to concerns by the Trump campaign over inflammatory language used by Democrats so far in this election.
In July of 1979, then-President Jimmy Carter took to the airwaves to address the nation about a threat that he believed “strikes at the very heart and soul and spirit of our national will.” Carter called it a “nearly invisible threat” that in many ways goes unnoticed. Carter dubbed it “a crisis of confidence.”
We can see this crisis in the growing doubt about the meaning of our own lives and in the loss of a unity of purpose for our nation. The erosion of our confidence in the future is threatening to destroy the social and the political fabric of America.
But, even during his own trying times, Carter dismissed out of hand the idea that the soul of America was at stake during his “crisis of confidence,” stating, “I do not mean our political and civil liberties.”
“They will endure.”
Forty-five years later, I fear I cannot say the same, as I firmly believe that America faces a new “crisis of confidence” threatening to destroy our social and political fabric.
Ten years ago, you might have dismissed my opinion as conspiratorial nonsense. Yes, we have a growing partisan divide. But no one would dare weaponize the levers of power in government to lord over political rivals.
Anyone paying attention to politics since President Donald Trump shocked the political establishment to its core in 2016 would laugh at our naivete.
When Trump defeated Hillary Clinton, the embodiment of an entrenched political legacy and the poster child of Washington “swamp” culture, a “fight or flight” reflex activated in partisans on the left, breaking a détente which Carter most likely imagined would endure; a silent agreement to never weaponize the powers entrusted to the federal government by We The People against a political rival.
I need not remind you of the myriad ways an unholy union of government power brokers, mainstream media, big tech social media platforms, and government bureaucracy behaved during the Trump years. Merely invoking the name “Hunter Biden” should be sufficient shorthand summarizing the left’s amplification (to the point of absurdity) of “Orange Man Bad” and the suppression of credible facts and circumstance that ran counter to their skewed narrative. From this manipulation spawned a form of fanatical tribalism that saw many politicians crossing lines that Carter took for granted.
Which brings us to the current political climate. It is a climate where it has become commonplace to call fellow Americans a “threat to democracy,” “vicious,” “dangerous,” or “extreme.” It’s a political climate where odious individuals go on national television and say, “They’re still going to have to go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump.”
And wouldn’t you know it? After nearly a decade of ratcheting up the temperature to a boiling point, someone tried to do just that.
Actually, two somebodies.
In the wake of this climate and the two assassination attempts that followed, it would be malpractice to not question what the hell is going on in the federal government. It would also not be unreasonable to debate whether government Is this incompetent or whether the near decade of political tribalism has taken its toll on essential government functions, like the protection of a political rival.
But that is where we are at. In the fallout of these assassination attempts, the latest of which prompted Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis to state that “it is not in the best interests of our state and nation to have the same federal agencies seeking to prosecute Trump leading this investigation.”
It is not just partisans on the right like DeSantis expressing a lack of confidence in the federal government. Even the staunchest voices on the left who are investigating cannot help but to criticize the Biden administration – of which they’re part of – because they too want to know how a shooter got onto a rooftop with a rifle and was able to get off multiple shots killing civilians in what should have been one of the most safe places anyone should have been.
Voices like Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), the chair of the panel charged by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee – who is no friend of Donald Trump – has expressed his dismay with the federal government failures as well as his opinion that our government has been less than forthcoming with relevant information:
I think the American people are going to be shocked and appalled by our findings as to the lapses and failures — on that day, at that site, but also more deep seeded — still plaguing the Secret Service, And I think the American people are also going to be deeply disappointed in the Department of Homeland Security, not just in the lapses In performance, but also in its resistance to providing information.
Those are pretty disturbing sentiments, made even more terrifying knowing that a second attempt happened weeks later. Same target. Same agency. Same lapses.
If partisans on both sides of the aisle are so brazenly questioning the effectiveness of the federal government to do its job, how can we not openly do the same?
Donald Trump’s campaign released a damning email to supporters on Monday, Sept. 16 highlighting more than 50 instances where Democrats have labeled him a threat to democracy.
The former president was the target of a second assassination attempt in two months when a suspect was discovered aiming a rifle towards the Trump International Golf Course in Palm Beach, FL, where Trump was playing a round on Sunday, Sept. 15.
58-year-old Ryan Routh has been charged with federal gun crimes in relation to the attempt on the former president’s life. His voting record and donation history revealed him to be a supporter of the Democrats for several years.
The Trump campaign has since emailed supporters dozens of instances where prominent Democrats have used “increasingly incendiary rhetoric” against the former president. Many examples feature Trump and his supporters being referred to as a “threat” to the United States or democracy itself.
Among them include the following – to give just a sampling of the rhetoric leading up to the second assassination attempt:
And not surprisingly, after the second attempt on Trump’s life the rhetoric against him hasn’t toned down one bit. But that was to obviously be expected, as the rhetoric only escalated following the first assassination attempt. Team Trump provided plenty of examples of that too:
Also featured are a number of examples of inflammatory rhetoric used against Trump between the two attempts on his life. While including comments by lower-profile Democrats, the campaign also highlighted instances by liberal commentators and broadcasters.
“Democrats and the Fake News must immediately cease their inflammatory, violent rhetoric against President Trump — which was mimicked by yesterday’s would-be assassin,” Trump’s campaign added.
A 150-second video of notable clips was shared on social media by the End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) account on X.
2.5 minutes of Democrats explicitly calling for using political vioIence.
Wokespy readers, your faithful correspondent lives in Vermont, so I can guarantee that what you’re about to see is actually “normal” in this woke-captured state. It’s a shame, because Vermont is exactly as beautiful as it looks in the postcards. There’s no trickery in the tourist advertising. This rural state of less than 700,000 people really is full of rolling green mountains and tiny Victorian hamlets. The villages feature the classic white church spires and town greens that many people think exist only in old Hollywood movies.
But this state is deeply, deeply weird. That’s not actually strong enough: Vermont is sick in the head.
I have a confession: I’m a former liberal Democrat. When I moved to the Green Mountain State in 2002 to take a job with a nonprofit (I know!), the leftward tilt didn’t stand out to me, since I was part of the crowd. But over the years it’s gotten worse to the point of being absolutely bonkers. Indeed, Vermont’s extremity is part of what forced me to mature and become a conservative.
Check this out from LibsOfTikTok:
That’s right. The state health department believes it is in their wheelhouse to tell fully grown-up, adult residents what they may and may not call their children. They want you to de-sex your family members by never using words like “son” or “daughter,” but to use “child” or “kid” instead. I’m only surprised they didn’t recommend “kiddo,” which seems to be one of the new terms liberal uber-mommies use to signal their allegiance to tribe blue hair.
And God forbid anyone should accurately refer to an “extended family,” because the Vermont Dept. of Health thinks grandma might be upset by that? Strange, since this type of state bureaucrat thinks of anyone elderly enough to have common sense to be a backward bigot whose feelings don’t count anyway.
If this kind of weird linguistic lecturing from a health department strikes you as strange, trust me, it’s “Vermont normal.” The state is doing much, much worse to destroy the health of confused children from troubled families. In 2023, the state passed a so-called “trans sanctuary state” bill. This legislation has legalized the parental kidnapping of children caught up in custody battles. If a mother (and it’s almost always the mother) wants to trans little Johnny and have his genitals removed because he’s “really a girl,” she can take him out of their home state and bring him to Vermont. Once here, the state’s police, social workers, and courts, are barred by law from cooperating with an arrest or extradition warrant for the abducting parent.
Compared to that bill giving the law’s blessing to vivisecting children, the health department’s language nannying seems positively tame. Let’s see what people on social media made of it.
The general public has better sense about children’s needs than the state does, for sure:
Some comic relief:
Speaking as a former progressive, Craig has hit the nail on the head:
Should you be able to smoke in your own home? Most people would say yes, but the issue gets a little complicated when it comes to shared housing, depending on the type. That being said, there’s bound to be controversy around this, so we wanted to bring you the story anyway. Starting in January, in Carlsbad, California, smoking and vaping of both cannabis and nicotine products will be banned in apartments, condos, and other shared buildings.
Cannabis is one thing…but not being able to smoke in your own home? In your own living room? Come on…
This nanny state nonsense doesn’t stop at your front door. The ban extends to private balconies, porches, decks, and patios. All apartments, condos, and townhouses will be affected.
We can’t help but think that it might be smoking today, and barbecues tomorrow…
A California beach town is banning residents from smoking inside their own homes, saying the health benefits outweigh concerns over government overreach https://t.co/kpA8FYqte7
— The Times and The Sunday Times (@thetimes) August 27, 2024
Unsurprisingly, this attack on personal freedom doesn’t apply to everyone equally. Single-family homes, hotels, and motels are conveniently exempt from the ban. It’s almost as if the wealthy elites who can afford their own houses don’t want these rules applied to them.
Enforcement Nightmare or Neighbor vs. Neighbor Warfare?
Here’s where it gets really tricky. The city admits they don’t have the resources for police or code enforcement to actually enforce this ridiculous law. Instead, they’re relying on landlords and tenants to take legal action against each other. That’s right – they want to turn neighbor against neighbor in some sort of twisted liberal snitch society.
At least 84 of California’s 483 municipalities have similar bans.
What do you think? Is this fair, or is it an enormous overreach?
Rob Schneider’s comedy acts are riling up audiences, tackling free speech controversies, and pushing his support for Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s presidential campaign.
Schneider’s Comedy Sparks Audience Backlash
Rob Schneider is no stranger to the wrath of the so-called tolerant left. Known for his anti-vaccine stance and right-wing views, Schneider has faced audience backlash on several occasions. Recently, he faced uproar at a charity event in Canada hosted by the Hospitals of Regina Foundation where his jokes were deemed transphobic and misogynistic. Yes, in Canada, the land of …niceness…, Schneider managed to ruffle feathers so much that his performance was cut short and an apology was issued to the audience.
Schneider’s ability to ‘shock’ might be a badge of honor in his quest for comedy that truly embraces free speech. He argues that speech acceptable to everyone requires no protection, whereas challenging speech does. If hordes of sensitive event attendees can’t handle ‘edgy,’ they might as well stay home wrapped in bubble wrap.
Supporting Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’
DON’T BELIEVE THE DEMOCRAT’S NEWEST LIE! My friend Robert Kennedy Jr. will not join forces with the truly malignant tumor on our Nation, Kamala Harris and Lockdown-Riot Allowing-Walz. https://t.co/xgEEixmfVx
In addition to his comedy, Schneider is channeling his energy into supporting independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He has even participated in comedy nights aimed at fundraising for the campaign. Unlike the Democrats who have turned into the “party of forever wars and censorship,” Kennedy seems to be giving voice to issues that the current administration would rather ignore.
“We spent five times more than they do in Europe for health care. And we have way worse results. We can’t have 60% of the American population unhealthy, 54% of children. That needs to be the biggest story for you guys in all mass media. The fact that children have chronic illness at over 50%, that’s a 10-12 year-old statistic. So we have to get people healthy,” Rob Schneider said, echoing comments made by his friend Kennedy.
Taking a stand is never easy, but Schneider has shown time and again that he’s not afraid to go against the grain. His political shift began in 2012 when he protested against a bill that required child vaccination exemptions to have medical approval.
Schneider’s support for Kennedy hasn’t gone unnoticed. In fact, it’s caused quite a stir within the Democratic Party. Perhaps because Kennedy is addressing the issues that matter to Americans—health care costs, homelessness, and public health, instead of focusing on foreign conflicts.
Controversial Fundraisers and Hollywood Blacklisting
At a recent fundraiser for Kennedy, Schneider pulled no punches, making jokes about the pandemic protocols and “wokeness.” For Schneider, the event was a night to remember. Alongside other comedians like Adam Carolla, Jeremy Piven, and Michael Binder, Schneider criticized high taxes in California and Disney’s stance on the transgender movement. The event was held at the Million Dollar Theater in Los Angeles for tickets ranging from $150 to $1,500.
“I’m trying to find a new way to make sure Hollywood never f***ing hires me again for a movie,” Schneider said.
It all goes to show that Rob Schneider isn’t about to shut up, sit down, and conform to Hollywood’s liberal agenda. Instead, he’s ready to take risks and speak on issues so many in Tinseltown fear to utter. As Schneider continues to support Kennedy, the liberals’ anxiety can be felt from coast to coast. With Kennedy addressing the issues that matter, it’s no wonder the Democrats are worried
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
