Left-wing extremism

Left-wing extremism

ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith Goes Off on the Left’s Continued Lawfare Against Trump

/

ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith expressed sharp criticism regarding Judge Juan Merchan’s decision to schedule President-elect Donald Trump’s sentencing just days before his January 20 inauguration.

The sentencing, set for January 10, comes after Trump was convicted in May on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to a nondisclosure agreement with adult film actress Stormy Daniels.

On “The Stephen A. Smith Show,” Smith questioned the purpose of the sentencing, suggesting it served no practical purpose other than to tarnish Trump’s reputation. “This is the kind of stuff that just validates assertions about stuff being politicized,” Smith said.

“Maybe not specifically with Trump, but the suspicion definitely is there. What is the purpose of this? Is he going to jail? Are you going to give a fine? We got to sit up there and go through all the pomp and circumstance when you know you’re not going to do anything.”

Smith criticized Judge Merchan, noting that the case’s substance and timing seemed politically charged. “He was certified today as the next president of the United States of America. Come January 21st, he will be sworn in as the 47th president of the United States of America. But … you want to sentence him,” Smith said. “You’re Juan Merchan — who is he, the state Supreme Court justice in New York? You want to sentence him next Friday? And by the way, what is the sentencing about?”

The charges stem from allegations that Trump falsified business records to conceal payments made to Daniels during his 2016 presidential campaign.

Smith questioned the gravity of the case, comparing it to non-disclosure agreements commonly used in business and legal contexts. “Thirty-four felony counts … sounds very, very damaging. It’s a hush-money case,” Smith said.

“Essentially, the case against Donald Trump is that he is alleged to have engaged in relations with a former porn star and he made efforts involving finances to keep her mouth shut. That’s what all of this is about?”

Smith also took aim at Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who opposed Trump’s motion to dismiss the case and suggested Judge Merchan could use an abatement mechanism, typically applied when a defendant dies between conviction and sentencing.

“Why? That’s going to validate everything for you? Did you get him? Did you put him in jail? Did you prevent him from winning the election? No, you did not,” Smith said. “So now all you’re doing is further impugning the name of the president-elect, soon to be the 47th president of the United States.”

Smith emphasized that the sentencing would not include jail time, nor would it prevent Trump from taking office, signing laws, or fulfilling his duties as president.

He also referenced Trump’s recent political influence, including his role in securing Republican Mike Johnson’s election as Speaker of the House. Smith’s remarks highlight ongoing debates about the intersection of law and politics in high-profile cases. Trump’s legal team has consistently argued that the charges against him are politically motivated, while his supporters view the case as part of a broader effort to undermine his presidency and political career.

As Trump prepares to take office as the 47th president, the January 10 sentencing is likely to reignite discussions about the fairness and motivations behind the legal proceedings.

For now, Smith’s criticism reflects a growing skepticism among many Americans about the politicization of the legal system.

Read More at Red Voice Media

Left-wing extremism, LGBTQ+

AOC Glitches Out: Keeping Men Out of Women’s Bathrooms is “Endangering Women”

/

It’s going to take some time for the liberal tears to dry up after the resounding victory of conservative politics on November 5. Not only did Donald Trump win the presidency, but Republicans kept the Senate, took the House, and the Supreme Court has a conservative majority. 

As the kids say (are they still saying this?), the situation has left Democrats with “big feels.” Not used to being told no, they’re throwing tantrums on MSNBC where the hosts can’t seem to control their emotions long enough to deliver a newscast without twitching. Some of the staff there are telling themselves fibs to get through it, like Chris Hayes. Hayes is very unhappy that the majority of Americans went for MAGA, so he’s written an article about how reality never happened. 

Yes, Chris, voters do want a MAGA makeover, and they’re going to get one. “Narrow win?” What’s next-accusations that Republicans have small genitalia? 

That MAGA makeover is starting up in the Capitol Building itself. The most recent dustup is over men using women’s bathrooms. Enter “Sarah” (formerly Tim) McBride, an oily gay man who put on a dress and calls himself a woman. McBride was just elected to the House of Representatives from Delaware, leading to a gush of articles about the “first transgender representative!” With any luck, we’ll soon be hearing about the last of that. 

Republican Rep. Nancy Mace isn’t having any of it. As any person of common sense would have said a mere 10 years ago, Mace stated that men have no place in women’s bathrooms, and she expects Congress to make sure that transvestites like McBride go to the men’s room where they belong. They are, after all, men. 

Liberal media are calling Mace’s statement a “cynical transphobic attack,” of course. 

Too bad. The lunatic fringe lost this one. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, after initially wimping out when questioned about whether he’d keep men out of the ladies’ room, announced that bathrooms in the Capitol are to be sorted by biological sex. You know, like always was until the West lost its everloving mind in the 20-teens and decided that sex was something you could put on like lipstick. 

Our Lady of Histrionics, NY Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, got out her big doe eyes and went full hysterical. She called Mace dangerous, and said this:

“They’re endangering women. They’re endangering girls of all kinds. And everybody should reject it. It’s gross.”

That’s right. Republicans are “endangering women” by protecting them from men in their bathrooms. Oh also, AOC? There is only one kind of girl—the female kind. And Tim McBride is not female. 

She also went on to complain that “They’re doing this so that Nancy Mace can make a buck and send a text and fundraise off an email. They’re not doing this to protect people,” as if this hasn’t been a stance taken by most Republicans since the trans issue became an issue.

AOC also claimed that Republicans want a world where every woman’s genitals are inspected upon entering the bathroom, despite this never having happened anywhere that trans bathroom “bans” exist.

Let’s see what X users had to say. 

Left-wing extremism

Democrats Rush to Self-Sterilize After Trump’s Election (Yes, Really)

/

It seems clear that leftists really are afraid of children, while at the same time acting like kids who got plonked into grown-up bodies. The histrionic wailing of leftist women nationwide about the alleged danger of Donald Trump to women’s “reproductive rights” has carried through post-election. Of course, “reproductive rights” anymore simply means “I want an abortion any time, any place, and I take zero responsibility for my sexual choices that might get me pregnant in the first place.”

Prominent screecher Mike Brezinski, co-host along with her husband Joe Scarborough of the MSNBC show “Morning Joe,” has gone farther than most. She straight up said that Donald Trump is “killing us,” and “killing women.” How these murders are taking place is not specified. And why the two of them then met with Trump after those comments remains a mystery – it’s almost as if they don’t believe their own hysterical rhetoric.

The Democrats blanketed the airwaves (OK, it’s 2024: “the internet”) with ham-handed political ads depicting a real-life Handmaid’s Tale if Trump were to be elected. One of the funniest was this ad showing two young women trying to “make it to the state line” to get out of their oppressive state for an abortion. A cop with an accent straight out of the 1970s movie Deliverance ends up cuffing the female driver and bending her over the hood of the car (yes, that implication seems to have been deliberate). Movie-psychopath look-alike Gavin Newsom, governor of California, still features the ad on his TikTok feed. 

Well, Trump has been elected, and the fever has not broken. According to CBS, the company that makes the “Plan B” abortion pill said sales went up 1,000 percent right after Trump’s election. Abortion and trans-hormones-to-harm-your-kids dealer Planned Parenthood is saying their requests for the implantation of intra-uterine devices (IUD), a form of contraception, are up almost 800 percent since November 5. 

It’s not just women. According to PP, men are asking for vasectomies in droves, with requests up 1,200 percent.

It really does appear that, to young liberals, the prospect of having children frightens them even more than “climate change,” or whatever “genocide” they fantasize is going on in Gaza. When and how did we become a society for whom the prospect of having kids is seen as a punishment and an infringement on a happy life? 

Let’s see what X/Twitter has to say about it. 

The reaction has not been kind. 

Left-wing extremism

Joy Reid Urges Progressive White Women Against Inviting Black Women To Anti-Trump Protest Marches

/

Joy Reid had her most outrageous liberal meltdown yet as the MSNBC broadcaster launched a racist rant surrounding protests following the 2024 Presidential Election.

Because she apparently can’t be crazy enough on MSNBC, Reid has a tendency to share even more radical beliefs on TikTok, always engaging in divisive tirades along racial lines. Her main attacks have been against President-elect Donald Trump, although she has recently shifted her attention to the bitterly defeated left to offer some godawful advice.

In one new video, Reid slammed White progressive women, warning them against inviting Black women to any anti-Trump protest marches.

“I’m just gonna tell you right now: They’re not coming,” she said. “I’m pretty sure Black women have resigned from the ‘save America’ coalition, ‘save democracy’ coalition, and definitely the ‘save the Democratic Party’ coalition.” Apparently Reid thinks a demographic that barely composes 6% of the U.S. population have been tasked with the role of “democracy defenders” – a role that seemingly requires doing nothing more than voting Democrat.

Reid then added, “I think Black women are now on the ‘save Black women,’ ‘prioritize Black men’ and ‘prioritize Black communities, Black businesses’ and, you know, the Black spaces. But ‘save America,’ ‘save the Democratic Party’ – yeah, I don’t think that’s happening.”

Many noted the racial division in Reid’s remarks.

Some also suggested Reid, among other mainstream media hosts, would become unemployed by the recent cultural shift back to the right. According to a 2024 Gallup poll, over a third (36%) of Americans have no confidence at all in the media, while another third (33%) have “not very much” confidence. Similarly, only 31% have a “great deal” or “fair amount” of confidence in the media’s ability to “fully, accurately and fairly,” report the news, highlighting the extent of biased reporting. 

Left-wing extremism

(Some of) The Best Post-Election Liberal Meltdowns, All In One Place

/

Donald Trump’s win in the 2024 presidential election prompted a whole host of totally-sane liberals to upload videos to TikTok.

Liberals were distraught at the night’s results, which saw Trump trounce Vice President Kamala Harris across the country in the greatest political comeback in American history.

The Libs of TikTok account on X (@libsoftiktok) summarized the best liberal meltdowns, beginning with one guy who is apparently a personal trainer. CJ Baker uploaded a video reacting to Trump’s win by announcing his lifelong boycott of Tesla – the car manufacturer owned by the pro-Trump Elon Musk.

Another liberal said she was “genuinely confused” as to what happened. Spoiler alert: her candidate attempted to run a non-stop attack campaign focused on the perceived threat to democracy despite the fact that she never won a primary.

One dude, with painted fingernails, was so upset that he simply turned on his camera and screamed for 30 seconds.

Another woman was bewildered that a majority of Americans chose a preferred candidate based on economic concerns over abortion. In fact, the exit poll said that the economy was a pressing issue for twice as many Americans than abortion.

Things took a real turn for the weird later on Wednesday, Nov. 6, when one woman – as some form of protest, one can only assume – shaved her head for TikTok.

Much to the likely pleasure of her neighbors, one woman went into her front yard and screeched.

Another woman took the more courteous approach of screaming wildly in a deserted area.

Finally, a Harris voter insulted the appearance of 70million+ Americans, calling them “dumb as bricks”.

It never ceases to amaze that these people make a conscious decision to have a meltdown, film it, and upload it to the internet. So, feel free to give them the attention they crave by sharing this article far and wide!

It’s likely this will just be part one of many.

Left-wing extremism

NYC Legalizes Jaywalking for Exact Reason You’re Expecting

/

To live in 21st century America is to be pushed to believe in lies and to watch the societal infrastructure get pulled down by do-gooders. One of the biggest lies we’re expected to swallow is the idea that America is “systemically racist” against black people. Since the mid 2010s, and exacerbated by the death of George Floyd and the rise of Black Lives Matter, media and Democrat politicians have shouted at the top of their lungs that white people have their fellow black Americans under a crushing boot. 

It’s outrageous because it’s so obviously backward. Black Americans have been raised to the status of an untouchable sacred caste while white Americans have to suffer being called racists and oppressors simply for noticing or saying “ouch” when they get mugged.

Open any social media platform, and you’ll be treated to countless videos of black mobs holding up stores, engaging in organized robbery and shoplifting, and assaulting white people with zero consequences. 

The U.S. Supreme Court overturned affirmative action in colleges, but evidence suggest universities are still admitting black students who are demonstrably less qualified than white applicants. As predicted, Ivies like Cornell are getting around the ban by renaming the practice. 

Somehow, the country fell asleep at the wheel and forgot everything it claimed to learn from civil rights leader Martin Luther King, who said character, not color, was what mattered. Today, our politicians and policy wonks follow the prescription of low-brow-but-popular “thinkers” like woke black radical Ibram X. Kendi, who says “The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination.”

Police departments have been gutted in cities across the country, and states like California have essentially legalized shoplifting unless it gets up to about $1,000 in value. 

New York City appears to be giving up on civic law and order completely. I can barely believe I’m writing this, but I am: New York City just legalized jaywalking. Why? Because of “racial disparities.” What does that mean? It means that because black people got caught jaywalking more than other groups, that New York was “doing a racism” to them. 

It’s necessary to spell it right out: you are not allowed to notice or react to black people displaying disproportionate criminality. If you do, you’re a racist. Black people are not allowed to be thought of as criminals, called criminals, or punished for criminal behavior.

The standards get lowered until they’re gone. 

You read that right. As per CBS:

Your average New Yorker is no stranger to jaywalking, which has been illegal since 1958. That’s about to change.  Starting in February, New Yorkers will no longer be breaking the law when crossing the street in between traffic, and will no longer receive a fine for jaywalking. 

The City Council has been working to decriminalize jaywalking, which is something nearly every New Yorker does. 

“In 2023, over 92% of jaywalking citations went to Black and Latino New Yorkers, highlighting an unacceptable disparity. The bill changes that by removing criminal penalties, ensuring everyone is treated fairly, regardless of race or backgroud,” said Councilmember Mercedes Narcisse, who sponsored the legislation. “Police officers have shared with me they prefer to focus on true public safety efforts, not issuing tickets for crossing the street.” 

Let’s see the reaction from X users. First up, Elon Musk himself. 

Left-wing extremism, LGBTQ+, Uncategorized

Surrounded by Fools: Bearded Lady Tells Ben Shapiro She’s a Man

/

It’s hard to say whether the fever of “gender ideology” may finally be breaking. Ever since Time Magazine declared in 2014 on its cover that America is reaching a “Transgender tipping point,” Americans have been bombarded with gender ideology. It seems there may be some cracks forming in this lunatic consensus, but if so, it’s going to take a while for the left to abandon the ideas. More on this below. 

But what is “gender ideology?” It is a constellation of ideas about sex, sexuality, humans, and “identities”, including:

  • The belief that biological sex is not real, but an arbitrary “choice.” No, it does not make sense, but yes, people do claim this. 
  • The belief that every person has a “gender identity,” and that “gender identity” is completely separate from their actual sexed body. For example, a man will be said to have a “female” “gender identity.” That means that he asserts that he believes he is a woman despite the factual reality. 
  • That a person’s “gender identity” controls whether they are male or female, with no regard to the person’s actual anatomy. 
  • Worst, the belief that children who do not conform to sex-role expectations (e.g., “boys play rough” and “girls like pretty things”) are born in the wrong body. Therefore, a little boy who likes sparkly princess stories is “really” a girl, and he should be chemically castrated and perhaps surgically, too. 

You can see what major medical institutions like the Cleveland Clinic say about “gender identity,” but be warned that allegedly scientific medical organizations are all completely captured by these magical beliefs. 

Until very recently, it has been socially forbidden to observe the obvious: a person who believes they were born in the wrong body and is actually the opposite sex has mental difficulties. Refusing to call men who claim to be women “she” has resulted in countless people being fired from their jobs and called bigots, and worse. 

But conservative commentator Ben Shapiro has  never been afraid to speak the truth. He walked right into the lion’s den recently, participating in a Youtube show called “Surrounded.” The conceit is that a speaker sits in the middle of a room surrounded by a circle of people who get a few minutes each to debate him on issues. 

That’s when this happened. 

The person on the right is not a man. She very much wants you to believe she is. She’s angry that Ben Shapiro won’t tell her that she’s a man. (It’s not clear from the video what her name is). But in reality, she is a woman on testosterone who has been “living as a man.” The picture above? That’s her swaggering over and turning the chair around to plunk down in a “manly” way (note the “manspread” sitting posture). 

In this short clip below, Shapiro and “Barb” debate the idea that someone can change their sex. Barb acts like a caricature of a macho bro-dude, hamming up the “masculine” mannerisms and speaking to Shapiro in a tone that sounds like she wants a fist fight. 

Here’s a sample of the dialogue:

Barb: First question-can men get pregnant? 

Ben: Men cannot get pregnant. 

Barb: So, I’m a transgender man, I’ve experienced SA (sexual abuse), and abortion rights affect me directly. So, if we’re talking about the American dream you live, why don’t I have access to that? Because there’s no legislation in the history of America that legislates a man’s body, so why does mine have to be legislated? I have a vagina.”

No, there isn’t more context that makes the above suddenly make sense. Here’s the whole clip. 

Barb wasn’t the only debate opponent who seemed, to put it generously, naïve. Here’s Ben speaking with a woman who asks, “Why does the definition of abortion have to include the death of a fetus?” Looking momentarily confused, Ben shoots back, “Because that’s literally the definition of ‘abortion’.”

You won’t be surprised to learn that his opponent does not agree. 

Click below to watch the entire hour-and-forty-minute-long video, if you’re so inclined. But be prepared, the liberal stupidity truly is off the charts.

Let’s see how X users reacted to Barb-n-Ben. 

Left-wing extremism

Tim Walz Appointee Called For “Overthrow” Of United States In Since-Deleted Video

/

An appointee of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz’s administration called for the “overthrow” of the United States, it’s been revealed.

Brian Lozenski, a self-described critical race theorist, was appointed by Gov. Walz’s education department to write the statewide curriculum for Minnesota’s new “ethnic studies” standards.

Although the state’s “implementation framework” was earmarked for public consultation, it’s now unlikely the public will have their say before the October 31 deadline. This is despite the controversial nature of the new ethnic studies which critics have labeled “anti-American.”

In a 2022 video, Lozenski talked about the use of critical race theory in schools.

“We don’t use critical race theory in school,” said Lozenski. “The first tenet of critical race theory is that the United States as constructed is irreversibly racist. So if the nation-state as constructed is irreversibly racist, then it must be done with, it must be overthrown, right?”

Lozenski went on to say that critical race theory is beyond “telling our stories and divers[ity]”.

“t’s not about that. It’s about overthrow. It’s insurgent. And we, we need to be, I think, more honest with that,” he added.

The video has since been deleted, although a snippet was uploaded to social media leaving commentors astonished by Lozenski’s remarks.

Others described his comments as treasonous.

Left-wing extremism

Broadcaster Stunned As Louisiana Democrat Encourages Trump Assassinations On Live Television

/

A Democrat in Louisiana publicly encouraged the assassination attempts against Donald Trump in a live call-in with C-SPAN’s Washington Journal.

The caller named Willie, who claimed to have served in the military for over 20 years, made the comments on Wednesday, Sept. 18 in which he said he was encouraged to “destroy the enemy by all means available”.

“I see we let this man (Trump) destroy America, and I look at it and see these two people had to step up and take that shot,” he said on national television.

A stunned John McArdle interrupted Willie and asked, “I’m sorry, you’re not advocating violence, are you?”

“Not violence,” came the response, “I’m defending my country.”

Many on social media were angered by the comments which saw Willie cut off before he could advocate anything else.

Other commentors on social media alluded to concerns by the Trump campaign over inflammatory language used by Democrats so far in this election.

Everyone Agrees: There’s A “Crisis of Confidence” In The Federal Government
Big Government, Democrats, Ethics, Left-wing extremism, Media, National Affairs

Everyone Agrees: There’s A “Crisis of Confidence” In The Federal Government

/

In July of 1979, then-President Jimmy Carter took to the airwaves to address the nation about a threat that he believed “strikes at the very heart and soul and spirit of our national will.” Carter called it a “nearly invisible threat” that in many ways goes unnoticed. Carter dubbed it “a crisis of confidence.”  

We can see this crisis in the growing doubt about the meaning of our own lives and in the loss of a unity of purpose for our nation. The erosion of our confidence in the future is threatening to destroy the social and the political fabric of America.

But, even during his own trying times, Carter dismissed out of hand the idea that the soul of America was at stake during his “crisis of confidence,” stating, “I do not mean our political and civil liberties.”

“They will endure.”

Forty-five years later, I fear I cannot say the same, as I firmly believe that America faces a new “crisis of confidence” threatening to destroy our social and political fabric.

Ten years ago, you might have dismissed my opinion as conspiratorial nonsense. Yes, we have a growing partisan divide. But no one would dare weaponize the levers of power in government to lord over political rivals.  

Anyone paying attention to politics since President Donald Trump shocked the political establishment to its core in 2016 would laugh at our naivete.  

When Trump defeated Hillary Clinton, the embodiment of an entrenched political legacy and the poster child of Washington “swamp” culture, a “fight or flight” reflex activated in partisans on the left, breaking a détente which Carter most likely imagined would endure; a silent agreement to never weaponize the powers entrusted to the federal government by We The People against a political rival.

I need not remind you of the myriad ways an unholy union of government power brokers, mainstream media, big tech social media platforms, and government bureaucracy behaved during the Trump years. Merely invoking the name “Hunter Biden” should be sufficient shorthand summarizing the left’s amplification (to the point of absurdity) of “Orange Man Bad” and the suppression of credible facts and circumstance that ran counter to their skewed narrative. From this manipulation spawned a form of fanatical tribalism that saw many politicians crossing lines that Carter took for granted.  

Which brings us to the current political climate. It is a climate where it has become commonplace to call fellow Americans a “threat to democracy,” “vicious,” “dangerous,” or “extreme.” It’s a political climate where odious individuals go on national television and say, “They’re still going to have to go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump.”

And wouldn’t you know it? After nearly a decade of ratcheting up the temperature to a boiling point, someone tried to do just that.

Actually, two somebodies.

In the wake of this climate and the two assassination attempts that followed, it would be malpractice to not question what the hell is going on in the federal government. It would also not be unreasonable to debate whether government Is this incompetent or whether the near decade of political tribalism has taken its toll on essential government functions, like the protection of a political rival.

But that is where we are at. In the fallout of these assassination attempts, the latest of which prompted Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis to state that “it is not in the best interests of our state and nation to have the same federal agencies seeking to prosecute Trump leading this investigation.”

It is not just partisans on the right like DeSantis expressing a lack of confidence in the federal government. Even the staunchest voices on the left who are investigating cannot help but to criticize the Biden administration – of which they’re part of – because they too want to know how a shooter got onto a rooftop with a rifle and was able to get off multiple shots killing civilians in what should have been one of the most safe places anyone should have been.

Voices like Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), the chair of the panel charged by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee – who is no friend of Donald Trump – has expressed his dismay with the federal government failures as well as his opinion that our government has been less than forthcoming with relevant information:

I think the American people are going to be shocked and appalled by our findings as to the lapses and failures —  on that day, at that site, but also more deep seeded — still plaguing the Secret Service, And I think the American people are also going to be deeply disappointed in the Department of Homeland Security, not just in the lapses In performance, but also in its resistance to providing information.

Those are pretty disturbing sentiments, made even more terrifying knowing that a second attempt happened weeks later. Same target. Same agency. Same lapses.  

If partisans on both sides of the aisle are so brazenly questioning the effectiveness of the federal government to do its job, how can we not openly do the same?


Subscribe Form

© 2025 WokeSpy All Rights Reserved

Scroll to Top