Left-wing extremism

Left-wing extremism, LGBTQ+

Hemorrhaging Sponsors: Bud Light & Budweiser Parent Company Anheuser-Busch Withdraws San Francisco Pride Sponsorship

Bud Light and Budweiser parent company Anheuser-Busch has canceled the San Francisco Pride (SF Pride) sponsorship citing financial constraints. 

Ranked as the largest LGBTQ+ event in the world attracting over 1 million participants, the San Francisco Pride will take place between June 28 and June 29, 2025, in California’s fourth-largest city. This year’s theme is “Queer Joy is Resistance” in the face of Trump’s onslaught on the radical woke ideology.

The beer brand lost over $27 billion after partnering with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney to celebrate “365 days of girlhood,” resulting in a conservative boycott that wiped out 30% of the company’s customers. Meanwhile, the San Francisco Pride continues to hemorrhage sponsors resulting in the loss of over $300,000 in funding out of the remaining $1.3 million after five sponsors pulled out. While the event’s overall funding goal is $2.3 million, SF Pride already has over $1 million committed.

The massive pullout occurred hot on the heels of various companies ditching woke policies including diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) hiring standards that prioritize race, gender, and sexual orientation. Besides Anheuser-Busch, other companies pulling out of the SF Pride include Comcast, Benefit Cosmetics, and Diageo, a British producer of popular alcoholic brands such as Smirnoff, Johnny Walker, Guinness, and La Crema wine. However, La Crema said it had not entirely ditched the LGBTQ+ community and hoped to partner with the SF Pride organizers in some limited capacity.

The San Francisco Pride also cut ties with Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp parent company Meta over its decision to ditch censorship and DEI hiring policies. Earlier this year, Meta removed tampons and other female sanitary products from men’s bathrooms, resulting in pro-transgender silent protests. Lamenting the pullout, SF Pride’s executive director, Suzanne Ford described the withdrawals were “very abnormal,” suggesting that companies were steadily shifting their priorities.

“I just interpreted that companies are making decisions that at this time it’s not good to be sponsoring Pride,” Ford told SFGATE. “I think in this political environment that they thought that was a risky decision. But that’s just me reading the tea leaves. I think for a long-term sponsor not to sponsor us, they are responding to what we are.”

In the present “return to common sense” era under President Trump, Ford inadvertently pointed out that becoming involved with radical woke policies was a risky business decision. However, she blamed the Trump administration for allegedly putting pressure on companies. 

“I’m very concerned. Obviously, there’s pressure from the federal government,” Ford told a Fox News affiliate KTVU.

“The tone has changed in this country. Businesses already hedge their bets, and I think people who, this isn’t their hard core value of their corporation, maybe they’re rethinking their investment.”

Nonetheless, Ford said the event would proceed as planned as they would look for new sponsors although its future was bleak. Ford also warned that many small businesses that benefitted from SF Pride would be significantly affected.

“The whole world will be watching to see if San Francisco still has those values. That they can come here and live their authentic lives,” Ford added.

In January, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to terminate DEI policies across the federal government in hiring, contracting, and spending. While U.S. District Judge Adam Abelson in Baltimore blocked the order, a three-bench appeals bench lifted the injunction allowing the policy to proceed.

Left-wing extremism

Trump-Hating NPR Journalist Identified as Reporter Behind Boom Mic Incident

Trump-Hating NPR Journalist Identified as Reporter Behind Boom Mic Incident

Laura Loomer has identified the reporter who hit President Donald Trump in the face with a boom mic last week as newly appointed NPR White House Correspondent Danielle Kurtzleben. According to Loomer’s post, Kurtzleben is a raging Trump hater and LGBTQ advocate.

Loomer wrote on X:

I have identified the reporter who hit President Donald Trump in the face with a boom mic this week while he was speaking to the press on the tarmac.

Her name is Danielle Kurtzleben @titonka. She is the newly appointed White House reporter for NPR and a massive Trump hater and LGBTQ advocate who once suggested during the 2024 campaign that Trump only spoke in Howell, Michigan because it has ties to the KKK.

Did she hit President Trump in the face on purpose?

For more context, here is Kurtzleben’s bio from the NPR website:

Danielle Kurtzleben is a political correspondent assigned to NPR’s Washington Desk. She appears on NPR shows, writes for the web, and is a regular on The NPR Politics Podcast. She is covering the 2024 presidential election, with particular focuses on economic policy and gender politics.

Before joining NPR in 2015, Kurtzleben spent a year as a correspondent for Vox.com. As part of the site’s original reporting team, she covered economics and business news.

Prior to Vox.com, Kurtzleben was with U.S. News & World Report for nearly four years, where she covered the economy, campaign finance, and demographic issues. As associate editor, she launched Data Mine, a data visualization blog on usnews.com.

A native of Titonka, Iowa, Kurtzleben has a bachelor’s degree in English from Carleton College. She also holds a master’s degree in global communication from George Washington University’s Elliott School of International Affairs.

That’s right, the so-called journalist is a notorious TDS sufferer.

And Loomer has the receipts:

Kurtzleben has since locked down her X account; what is she worried about?

We can’t verify that Kurtzleben was the woman who hit Trump in the face with the boom mic, but whoever it was poses a serious security risk.

Colorado Republican Lauren Boebert said former President Biden would have been knocked over by the mic hit, while others wonder if it was intentional.

“She just made television tonight,” Trump said several seconds after the moment of impact.

“She just became a big story tonight, right? Did you see that?”

Trump was right, and MAGA isn’t letting this one go.

Visit The Daily Fetched for more stories like this.

Left-wing extremism

Prominent Conservative “SWATTED” — Likely by Far Left Radicals

The left relies on reversing the truth. Calling black white and good bad is the oldest psychological trick in the book for a reason: it works. Turning the truth around on your political enemies is straight out of the Marxist, politically radical playbook. “Accuse your enemy of what you are doing” has been attributed variously to Karl Marx and Saul Alinsky, though it’s impossible to say whether either of them actually wrote the phrase. 

Regardless, it’s just another way of describing the “narcissistic reversal,” which is captured in the acronym “DARVO”

  • Deny
  • Attack
  • Reverse
  • Victim and
  • Offender

DARVO is usually brought up in the context of domestic or interpersonal abuse, but what we think of as domestic abuse tactics are the very same used by radical leftists to tar their targets with the crimes that they are guilty of. The Democrats under Joe Biden practiced it daily, claiming that the greatest threat to American security came from conservative voters who they labeled “domestic extremists.” The Biden administration ginned up the specter of “Proud Boys” and “Right Wing Militias” to cover up the fact that it was the administration, the left, practicing terror tactics on conservative parents who showed up at school board meetings to protest leftist indoctrination, as just one example. 

Where are these right-wing militias? Where is the death and destruction we have been told they are carrying out? Except in vanishingly rare instances, it’s not real. The actual domestic extremists are those on the left who have been taking over university campuses to “protest” for Palestine, or trying to blow up or vandalize Tesla dealerships because they hate Elon Musk and his work for the Trump administration. 

But it’s not just headline grabbing public stunts. The radicals on the left are trying to terrorize conservatives on an individual basis by hitting them, literally, where they live. “Swatting” is the term used when someone falsely calls the police to report a dangerous situation like an armed gunman, or a family member posing a danger to everyone else in the home. Law enforcement then sends a SWAT team to the location, putting innocent people at risk of being mistaken for violent criminals, and at risk of being shot or killed. 

This week, prolific conservative X/Twitter poster Gunther Eagleman (real name: David J Freeman) revealed that he was targeted. Eagleman wrote that someone told emergency responders there was a “hostage situation” at his house, which sent the SWAT team rolling. 

Fortunately, he and his family are safe, but “swatting” has resulted in innocent people being killed before. It’s hard to think of something more hateful and dangerous than terrorizing a man and his wife and children with cops bearing loaded guns. 

As you would expect, the majority of X users were relieved and supportive. 

This user is drawing some connections:

Reporter Jamie White, who worked for Alex Jones’ Infowars, was just murdered. Is there a connection? 

Left-wing extremism, LGBTQ+

Democrat Melts Down When Committee Chair Won’t Call a Man “She”

Parenting guides have been published for at least several hundred years in the West, full of advice on everything from diet, to curing colic, to whether and how to “sleep train” a baby. But we need a guide for how to parent adult babies, otherwise known as Democratic lawmakers. So far, the only option most people can think of to deal with the left’s temper tantrums is to let them cry it out. 

And oh, are they crying it out. The sour faces, heckling, shouting, and infantile signs—”Musk Steals!”—of the Democrat half of the Senate during President Trump’s first address to a joint session of Congress was the most immature display in politics in living memory. Even the lunatic-left Washington Post acknowledged it, though in the gentlest possible language, calling the party’s behavior a “low ebb.”

Transgender ideology, even more than shoveling endless billions to Ukraine, seems to be the issue that brings your average Democrat to hysteria quicker than anything else. Republican Representative Keith Self of Texas learned this when he referred to another male member of the House as  “Mr. McBride.” Self’s colleague, Massachusetts Democrat Bill Keating, jerked like a dog on a chain and started barking at Rep. Self. 

Why? Because Self referred to “Mr. McBride.” The Democratic Representative from Delaware is a man formerly known as Tim McBride who now calls himself Sarah McBride, and tells the world that he is a woman. 

McBride immediately referred to Chairman Self as “Madam Chair” right back, I guess in an attempt to “show him what misgendering feels like.” It doesn’t make much sense, because McBride was being correctly gendered the whole time.

Bill Keating didn’t think that McBride could defend himself, apparently, and rushed in like a knight errant to defend the “lady’s” honor. “Would you repeat what you just  said,” he asked Rep. Self in an outraged voice. 

Representative Keating got even more emotional, pulling a McCarthy-hearing-moment on Self, spluttering, “have you no decency?” and telling the chairman that he was “out of order” and that he, Keating, would not be participating in any hearing until Self agreed to call McBride a woman. 

Check it out:

Self’s response was a gavel bang along with “This meeting is adjourned.”

Let’s see how X/Twitter users saw it. 

Left-wing extremism, tax

TikToker Threatens Musk’s Life, Brags About Back Taxes-IRS Found Her!

“Spare the rod and spoil the child.”

Whether you take this literally or not, it is not merely a “saying.” Modern permissive and indulgent parenting may not credit this, but never saying no to a child, never putting a limit on what you will do for them, and never making them pay a price for antisocial behavior, will actually spoil that child. 

A spoiled child isn’t merely a kid who’s not sufficiently grateful for a treasure trove of Christmas presents. Truly spoiled children grow up into narcissistic and exploitative adults. They remain “spoiled children,” but they’re old enough to do bigger damage in the world. A child who never experienced consequences for breaking the rules, stealing what wasn’t hers, or defying legal or social conventions, will become an adult who exploits others, parasitizes her friends, and breaks the law without a care. 

We’ve got at least two generations of spoiled children—Millennials and Gen Z—under our belts in America now. The obvious rise in narcissistic, abusive, attention-seeking behavior on every screen and device we look at shows it. Many of these children-in-adult-bodies aren’t ever going to grow up. No, they’re not going to “get a real world lesson when they get into the workforce,” because they’re now the bosses of the workplace. We’re stuck with this.

Lawlessness among allegedly respectable adults has become “new normal” at the highest levels. New Jersey Governor Chris Murphy felt comfortable and confident taunting Immigration and Customs Enforcement on camera a few weeks ago, daring them to “come get” what seemed to be an illegal alien that Murphy said he wanted to move into his extra apartment so she could evade detection. 

Maine Governor Janet Mills attended a lunch meeting at the White House recently and confidently stated to President Trump’s face that she was going to defy his lawful executive order. That order instructed the states to stop allowing so called “trans girls” (that is, boys and men) to compete on girls’ sports teams. If they refused to halt this behavior, the government would cut off all federal funding to the state. “See you in court,” Mills sniped at Trump when he told her “you’d better comply.”

This level of open defiance of the rule of law is new in America, and it’s happening almost exclusively on the left. It’s the result of spoiled, narcissistic children in adult bodies. We can’t know how they were raised at home, but we can see that leftists have gotten away with violence, illegal court maneuvers, and defiance of the law for years with pretty much no consequences. 

That’s why women like this exist. Take a look at this woman’s TikTok video and marvel. She affects a girlish manner, inserting the word “like” into every sentence, and preening for the camera, while she calls for the assassination of Elon Musk. The lack of consequences in her life is obvious, as she moves right onto admitting that she has not paid taxes in eight years. That’s because there aren’t enough people to investigate her for her threats or unpaid taxes, she says. 

By the by, readers, your correspondent comes from a family shot through with what are called “Cluster B personality disorders.” These are extreme narcissism, emotional instability, pathological lying, and the like (you know, leftist behaviors). Pay attention to the way she moves her face, pay attention to the “crazy eyes,” and take note of the fashionable “serial killer” glasses. You will often find this presentation in unstable and dangerous people. 

In this case, the consequences might just come. It seems that the IRS did notice, and they believe they have sufficient staff to investigate:

Let’s see what onlookers had to say. 

OK, this one’s funny. 

Left-wing extremism

Actor Woody Harrelson: “Dr. Fauci Did Some Extraordinarily Evil Sh*t!”

Hollywood actor Woody Harrelson tore into former President Joe Biden‘s chief medical advisor, Dr. Anthony Fauci, during an appearance on Joe Rogan’s Saturday podcast.

Harrelson criticized Fauci while praising RFK Jr. as “heroic” and a “man who cares deeply.”

The actor slammed Fauci for pushing the azidothymidine (AZT) vaccine during the 1980s AIDS crisis. When Rogan asked Harrelson about RFK Jr.’s accusations that Fauci experimented on foster kids, Harrelson didn’t hold back.

“Fauci did some extraordinarily evil sh*t,” he said. “He knows what he did.”

“He started with the AZT thing! And, you know, AZT was known to be a highly toxic, really ineffective drug, and of course, that was the one they picked,” Harrelson told Rogan.

“And so they started using that again, and I don’t know how many people got killed,” he added.

“That killed friends of mine. AZT was very toxic, and they finally had to yank it. And now they use different chemical cocktails,” the actor added.

Rogan then chimed in about Fauci’s recent pardon, stating: “He’s pre-pardoned federally, but he’s not pre-pardoned state-wise.”

Fauci received a preemptive pardon from Biden, which ignited the fury of his critics, who believe the doctor lied to Congress about the U.S. sending money to fund gain-of-function research at a Wuhan, China, lab.

“These states can still sue him. Not only that, when you’re pardoned, you can no longer plead the Fifth, so you could be held for perjury,” Rogan said.

“There’s a lot of issues with being pardoned that I don’t think Biden took into consideration, or Fauci took into consideration either. I think he just wanted anything to protect him because he knew it was coming,” he added.

“It’s just a bummer that someone had that kind of power for so long and was such a f***ing monster,” Rogan continued.

Read More at the Daily Fetched

Left-wing extremism

ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith Goes Off on the Left’s Continued Lawfare Against Trump

ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith expressed sharp criticism regarding Judge Juan Merchan’s decision to schedule President-elect Donald Trump’s sentencing just days before his January 20 inauguration.

The sentencing, set for January 10, comes after Trump was convicted in May on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to a nondisclosure agreement with adult film actress Stormy Daniels.

On “The Stephen A. Smith Show,” Smith questioned the purpose of the sentencing, suggesting it served no practical purpose other than to tarnish Trump’s reputation. “This is the kind of stuff that just validates assertions about stuff being politicized,” Smith said.

“Maybe not specifically with Trump, but the suspicion definitely is there. What is the purpose of this? Is he going to jail? Are you going to give a fine? We got to sit up there and go through all the pomp and circumstance when you know you’re not going to do anything.”

Smith criticized Judge Merchan, noting that the case’s substance and timing seemed politically charged. “He was certified today as the next president of the United States of America. Come January 21st, he will be sworn in as the 47th president of the United States of America. But … you want to sentence him,” Smith said. “You’re Juan Merchan — who is he, the state Supreme Court justice in New York? You want to sentence him next Friday? And by the way, what is the sentencing about?”

The charges stem from allegations that Trump falsified business records to conceal payments made to Daniels during his 2016 presidential campaign.

Smith questioned the gravity of the case, comparing it to non-disclosure agreements commonly used in business and legal contexts. “Thirty-four felony counts … sounds very, very damaging. It’s a hush-money case,” Smith said.

“Essentially, the case against Donald Trump is that he is alleged to have engaged in relations with a former porn star and he made efforts involving finances to keep her mouth shut. That’s what all of this is about?”

Smith also took aim at Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who opposed Trump’s motion to dismiss the case and suggested Judge Merchan could use an abatement mechanism, typically applied when a defendant dies between conviction and sentencing.

“Why? That’s going to validate everything for you? Did you get him? Did you put him in jail? Did you prevent him from winning the election? No, you did not,” Smith said. “So now all you’re doing is further impugning the name of the president-elect, soon to be the 47th president of the United States.”

Smith emphasized that the sentencing would not include jail time, nor would it prevent Trump from taking office, signing laws, or fulfilling his duties as president.

He also referenced Trump’s recent political influence, including his role in securing Republican Mike Johnson’s election as Speaker of the House. Smith’s remarks highlight ongoing debates about the intersection of law and politics in high-profile cases. Trump’s legal team has consistently argued that the charges against him are politically motivated, while his supporters view the case as part of a broader effort to undermine his presidency and political career.

As Trump prepares to take office as the 47th president, the January 10 sentencing is likely to reignite discussions about the fairness and motivations behind the legal proceedings.

For now, Smith’s criticism reflects a growing skepticism among many Americans about the politicization of the legal system.

Read More at Red Voice Media

Left-wing extremism, LGBTQ+

AOC Glitches Out: Keeping Men Out of Women’s Bathrooms is “Endangering Women”

It’s going to take some time for the liberal tears to dry up after the resounding victory of conservative politics on November 5. Not only did Donald Trump win the presidency, but Republicans kept the Senate, took the House, and the Supreme Court has a conservative majority. 

As the kids say (are they still saying this?), the situation has left Democrats with “big feels.” Not used to being told no, they’re throwing tantrums on MSNBC where the hosts can’t seem to control their emotions long enough to deliver a newscast without twitching. Some of the staff there are telling themselves fibs to get through it, like Chris Hayes. Hayes is very unhappy that the majority of Americans went for MAGA, so he’s written an article about how reality never happened. 

Yes, Chris, voters do want a MAGA makeover, and they’re going to get one. “Narrow win?” What’s next-accusations that Republicans have small genitalia? 

That MAGA makeover is starting up in the Capitol Building itself. The most recent dustup is over men using women’s bathrooms. Enter “Sarah” (formerly Tim) McBride, an oily gay man who put on a dress and calls himself a woman. McBride was just elected to the House of Representatives from Delaware, leading to a gush of articles about the “first transgender representative!” With any luck, we’ll soon be hearing about the last of that. 

Republican Rep. Nancy Mace isn’t having any of it. As any person of common sense would have said a mere 10 years ago, Mace stated that men have no place in women’s bathrooms, and she expects Congress to make sure that transvestites like McBride go to the men’s room where they belong. They are, after all, men. 

Liberal media are calling Mace’s statement a “cynical transphobic attack,” of course. 

Too bad. The lunatic fringe lost this one. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, after initially wimping out when questioned about whether he’d keep men out of the ladies’ room, announced that bathrooms in the Capitol are to be sorted by biological sex. You know, like always was until the West lost its everloving mind in the 20-teens and decided that sex was something you could put on like lipstick. 

Our Lady of Histrionics, NY Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, got out her big doe eyes and went full hysterical. She called Mace dangerous, and said this:

“They’re endangering women. They’re endangering girls of all kinds. And everybody should reject it. It’s gross.”

That’s right. Republicans are “endangering women” by protecting them from men in their bathrooms. Oh also, AOC? There is only one kind of girl—the female kind. And Tim McBride is not female. 

She also went on to complain that “They’re doing this so that Nancy Mace can make a buck and send a text and fundraise off an email. They’re not doing this to protect people,” as if this hasn’t been a stance taken by most Republicans since the trans issue became an issue.

AOC also claimed that Republicans want a world where every woman’s genitals are inspected upon entering the bathroom, despite this never having happened anywhere that trans bathroom “bans” exist.

Let’s see what X users had to say. 

Left-wing extremism

Democrats Rush to Self-Sterilize After Trump’s Election (Yes, Really)

It seems clear that leftists really are afraid of children, while at the same time acting like kids who got plonked into grown-up bodies. The histrionic wailing of leftist women nationwide about the alleged danger of Donald Trump to women’s “reproductive rights” has carried through post-election. Of course, “reproductive rights” anymore simply means “I want an abortion any time, any place, and I take zero responsibility for my sexual choices that might get me pregnant in the first place.”

Prominent screecher Mike Brezinski, co-host along with her husband Joe Scarborough of the MSNBC show “Morning Joe,” has gone farther than most. She straight up said that Donald Trump is “killing us,” and “killing women.” How these murders are taking place is not specified. And why the two of them then met with Trump after those comments remains a mystery – it’s almost as if they don’t believe their own hysterical rhetoric.

The Democrats blanketed the airwaves (OK, it’s 2024: “the internet”) with ham-handed political ads depicting a real-life Handmaid’s Tale if Trump were to be elected. One of the funniest was this ad showing two young women trying to “make it to the state line” to get out of their oppressive state for an abortion. A cop with an accent straight out of the 1970s movie Deliverance ends up cuffing the female driver and bending her over the hood of the car (yes, that implication seems to have been deliberate). Movie-psychopath look-alike Gavin Newsom, governor of California, still features the ad on his TikTok feed. 

Well, Trump has been elected, and the fever has not broken. According to CBS, the company that makes the “Plan B” abortion pill said sales went up 1,000 percent right after Trump’s election. Abortion and trans-hormones-to-harm-your-kids dealer Planned Parenthood is saying their requests for the implantation of intra-uterine devices (IUD), a form of contraception, are up almost 800 percent since November 5. 

It’s not just women. According to PP, men are asking for vasectomies in droves, with requests up 1,200 percent.

It really does appear that, to young liberals, the prospect of having children frightens them even more than “climate change,” or whatever “genocide” they fantasize is going on in Gaza. When and how did we become a society for whom the prospect of having kids is seen as a punishment and an infringement on a happy life? 

Let’s see what X/Twitter has to say about it. 

The reaction has not been kind. 

Left-wing extremism

Joy Reid Urges Progressive White Women Against Inviting Black Women To Anti-Trump Protest Marches

Joy Reid had her most outrageous liberal meltdown yet as the MSNBC broadcaster launched a racist rant surrounding protests following the 2024 Presidential Election.

Because she apparently can’t be crazy enough on MSNBC, Reid has a tendency to share even more radical beliefs on TikTok, always engaging in divisive tirades along racial lines. Her main attacks have been against President-elect Donald Trump, although she has recently shifted her attention to the bitterly defeated left to offer some godawful advice.

In one new video, Reid slammed White progressive women, warning them against inviting Black women to any anti-Trump protest marches.

“I’m just gonna tell you right now: They’re not coming,” she said. “I’m pretty sure Black women have resigned from the ‘save America’ coalition, ‘save democracy’ coalition, and definitely the ‘save the Democratic Party’ coalition.” Apparently Reid thinks a demographic that barely composes 6% of the U.S. population have been tasked with the role of “democracy defenders” – a role that seemingly requires doing nothing more than voting Democrat.

Reid then added, “I think Black women are now on the ‘save Black women,’ ‘prioritize Black men’ and ‘prioritize Black communities, Black businesses’ and, you know, the Black spaces. But ‘save America,’ ‘save the Democratic Party’ – yeah, I don’t think that’s happening.”

Many noted the racial division in Reid’s remarks.

Some also suggested Reid, among other mainstream media hosts, would become unemployed by the recent cultural shift back to the right. According to a 2024 Gallup poll, over a third (36%) of Americans have no confidence at all in the media, while another third (33%) have “not very much” confidence. Similarly, only 31% have a “great deal” or “fair amount” of confidence in the media’s ability to “fully, accurately and fairly,” report the news, highlighting the extent of biased reporting. 


Scroll to Top