Left-wing extremism

Soros Backed DA Keith Ellison’s Wild Antifa Claim Obliterated by His Own Tweet
Left-wing extremism

Soros Backed DA Keith Ellison’s Wild Antifa Claim Obliterated by His Own Tweet

/

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison is facing renewed criticism after an old social media post resurfaced showing him holding a book titled Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook.

The image, originally shared during his time in Congress, has reignited debate about the Democratic Party’s relationship with far-left activist groups.

The controversy comes as federal and state officials continue to grapple with how to address violence linked to Antifa-affiliated demonstrators.

Over the past several years, the group has been tied to riots, property destruction, and attacks during political rallies across major U.S. cities.

Law enforcement agencies have repeatedly described Antifa as a decentralized movement with organized elements that engage in violence under the banner of “anti-fascism.”

Ellison, who previously served as deputy chair of the Democratic National Committee, has faced questions about his past remarks minimizing Antifa’s existence.

During prior interviews, Ellison echoed a common line among some Democrats that the group was “more of an idea” than an organization.

Critics argue that his earlier comments are contradicted by his public endorsement of a handbook associated with the movement.

The photograph, which showed Ellison smiling while holding the book, was originally posted to his personal social media account. “At a bookstore and found this excellent book,” Ellison wrote in the post, which quickly drew attention online when it first appeared and continues to circulate years later.

The renewed focus on the image coincides with broader scrutiny of left-wing activism and its connection to street violence.

During President Trump’s first term, the administration labeled Antifa as a domestic threat and directed federal agencies to prioritize investigations into coordinated attacks involving masked demonstrators.

Officials cited incidents in Portland, Seattle, and other cities where Antifa-linked groups clashed with law enforcement and conservative protesters.

Political observers note that the resurfaced photo has put Ellison in a difficult position as he seeks to maintain credibility as Minnesota’s top law enforcement officer.

Republicans in the state have seized on the image as evidence of hypocrisy, arguing that Ellison’s past praise of Antifa undermines his authority to enforce public order.

While Ellison has not issued a new statement regarding the photograph, his earlier dismissal of Antifa as “nebulous” remains part of the public record.

Those remarks have been widely criticized by conservative lawmakers and commentators who point to the documented involvement of self-identified Antifa members in violent demonstrations.

The controversy also arrives at a time when Democrats face growing internal division over how to handle radical factions within their base.

Efforts to distance the party from left-wing extremism have been complicated by viral images such as Ellison’s, which opponents argue reveal a pattern of tolerance toward political violence when it aligns with progressive causes.

Law enforcement officials continue to monitor Antifa-related activity in several U.S. cities, emphasizing that the group’s loose organization makes prosecution challenging.

Federal authorities have described members as part of a network of local cells that coordinate online and frequently mobilize during protests against government policies.

The resurfaced image of Ellison holding Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook remains a striking example of how digital history can follow public figures long after the initial controversy fades.

With political tensions rising nationwide, the photo’s reappearance has renewed questions about accountability, judgment, and the line between activism and extremism—particularly for those charged with upholding the law.

Ivy League Panel Applauded Guest Who Promoted Violence Against Political Opponents
Left-wing extremism

Ivy League Panel Applauded Guest Who Promoted Violence Against Political Opponents

/

A resurfaced 2018 panel hosted by Harvard University’s Carr-Ryan Center for Human Rights is drawing attention after three faculty members praised a guest speaker who defended armed left-wing political violence.

The panel, titled “You Don’t Stand Around and Let People Get Hurt: Antifascism After Charlottesville,” featured Professor Dwayne Dixon of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Dixon was placed on administrative leave Monday following reports of his activism with the far-left gun group Redneck Revolt.

Video of the event was pulled from the Carr-Ryan Center’s YouTube page after UNC announced Dixon’s leave.

Harvard faculty members who participated in the discussion included Education Professor Timothy McCarthy, American History and African American Studies Professor Vincent Brown, and American History Professor Lisa McGirr.

Brown, who introduced Dixon, said, “Many of you are aware of the ongoing vigorous debate over whether it’s OK to punch a Nazi. I personally happen to believe that the ethical question was settled by WWII and Raiders of the Lost Ark.”

He added, “All four of [the panel members] are committed to study, interpretation and reasoned debate, but are well aware that deliberation might have distinct limits in the face of opponents who would prefer to see us eliminated.”

Dixon spoke for roughly 30 minutes, presenting Redneck Revolt as a group confronting neo-Nazis, White supremacists, and fascists during the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia.

While neo-Nazi groups were present, critics have noted that such labels have also been directed at ordinary conservatives and supporters of President Donald Trump for years.

Neither Dixon nor the Harvard faculty distinguished between extremist groups and mainstream right-leaning Americans.

During his remarks, McCarthy linked the Trump administration to fascism, stating that LGBTQ people had “a sense, perhaps quite real, that we are indeed at war and that this is a different kind of phase of war that is more specific, more linked to domestic insurgency of White supremacy, the rise of that, a fascist state under the Trump-Pence regime.”

He also described the moment as “an emergent fascist moment with all the signs of that from history that if we’re paying attention.”

Dixon referenced abolitionist Frederick Douglass in his argument.

“We’re given the enemy, the White supremacist capitalist slave farmer and the means to act. Douglass is not victim of some faint-hearted anxiety about the use of force to free slaves, and to dispatch those who would threaten their freedom or their lives. He plainly says the system must be met with its own weapons,” he said.

McCarthy later suggested that violent measures could be justified, saying, “This may indeed be a moment that calls for a more robust integration of tactics and strategies that include both violence and nonviolence.”

McGirr, who initially expressed doubts, ultimately endorsed Dixon’s message.

“This was a beautiful, brilliant, wonderful, very convincing talk. So, you know, I actually came in here relatively skeptical about your use of, you know, coming armed to Charlottesville, and what happened in North Carolina,” she said.

“And at the end, I’m kind of convinced, actually, you know, that there is a place for this.”

Redneck Revolt, which the Counter Extremism Project describes as a “far-left group” that “claims to be a community defense group against racism and fascism,” was sued by the city of Charlottesville for allegedly violating an anti-paramilitary law after the 2017 rally.

The group entered into a consent decree to avoid trial. It later disbanded in 2019, according to a message posted on its website.

In announcing Dixon’s administrative leave, UNC condemned political violence.

The episode comes as Harvard faces separate disputes with the Trump administration over federal funding.

Earlier this year, President Trump froze $2.4 billion in grants to the university amid campus protests and concerns over antisemitism.

This week, Trump confirmed that a deal had been reached to restore funding, with the university agreeing to allocate $500 million toward trade schools.

“We’re in the process of getting very close, and [Secretary of Education] Linda [McMahon] is finishing up the final details, and they’d be paying about $500 million,” Trump said.

“And they’ll be operating trade schools, and they’ll be teaching people how to do AI and lots of other things. Engines, lots of things.”

North Carolina Deputy Exposed for Radical Antifa Posts Is Terminated
Left-wing extremism

North Carolina Deputy Exposed for Radical Antifa Posts Is Terminated

/

A North Carolina detention officer has been terminated after publicly declaring allegiance to Antifa and posting comments suggesting violent retribution against political opponents.

The Orange County Sheriff’s Office confirmed Monday that Brian Edwards, 37, was dismissed following an internal review of his social media activity.

Edwards, who had been promoted to corporal in May, made several posts on the platform BlueSky that surfaced online over the weekend.

According to the News & Observer, the posts were flagged by the X account “Mostly Peaceful Memes,” which highlighted Edwards’ statements calling for trials and punishment of those he described as “traitors.”

“I maintain that the biggest mistake the US government has ever made was letting the traitors from the civil war back into our country without punishment,” Edwards wrote, according to the screenshots shared.

“When this is over and the right wing is once again [defeated, we] will not make that same mistake.”

In another post, Edwards wrote, “There will be war crimes trials and I can’t wait to see every one of them thrown into prison for the rest of their lives. It may even be time to bring back the guillotine.”

His account also featured a photo of a guitar bearing the phrase “This Machine Kills Fascists,” a slogan popularized by folk singer Woody Guthrie.

Sheriff Charles Blackwood confirmed Edwards’ firing and stressed that public confidence in law enforcement must remain intact.

“We must maintain the public trust as we go about our mission to protect, serve, and treat everyone with dignity and respect,” Blackwood told the News & Observer.

He said Edwards had violated the agency’s standards of conduct and social media policies.

The dismissal comes amid renewed national attention on Antifa. President Donald Trump announced Wednesday on Truth Social that the organization would be formally designated a terrorist group.

“I am pleased to inform our many U.S.A. Patriots that I am designating ANTIFA, A SICK, DANGEROUS, RADICAL LEFT DISASTER, AS A MAJOR TERRORIST ORGANIZATION,” Trump wrote.

“I will also be strongly recommending that those funding ANTIFA be thoroughly investigated in accordance with the highest legal standards and practices.”

Antifa has been tied to violent demonstrations across the country in recent years.

The group was prominently involved in riots following the death of George Floyd in May 2020, which led to widespread property damage and confrontations with police in multiple cities.

Members were also present in Portland, Oregon, where clashes continued into January 2021.

The organization has also been linked to direct attacks on individuals. In June 2019, journalist Andy Ngo was beaten while covering a demonstration in Portland, suffering a brain injury after being assaulted by Antifa activists.

Edwards’ firing places renewed focus on the issue of extremist sympathies within law enforcement ranks.

While the Orange County Sheriff’s Office moved swiftly to terminate his employment, officials emphasized that preserving impartiality and professionalism remains central to maintaining community trust.

The case has also drawn attention to the broader political debate over Antifa’s designation and activities.

With Trump’s announcement, federal authorities may face new pressure to investigate individuals and organizations tied to the group, particularly in light of its history of involvement in violent unrest.

President Trump Isn’t Backing Down From Crushing Radical Left Violence by Red Voice News

Edwards has not commented publicly since his dismissal.

The sheriff’s office has indicated that the matter is closed with respect to his employment, but the episode has already fueled discussion about the challenges posed when law enforcement officers are found to have public ties to extremist movements.

Antifa Officially Designated Domestic Terrorists Under Trump Executive Action
Left-wing extremism

Antifa Officially Designated Domestic Terrorists Under Trump Executive Action

/

President Donald Trump has signed an executive order officially designating Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization, representing the most significant federal action against the group to date.

The order describes Antifa as a “militarist, anarchist enterprise” whose stated goal is to undermine and overthrow the United States government and law enforcement.

According to the text, the group has organized campaigns of violence nationwide, including riots, assaults on officers, armed standoffs, and intimidation of political figures.

It further alleges that Antifa recruits and radicalizes young Americans while concealing its funding sources and shielding the identities of its members.

“Antifa recruits, trains, and radicalizes young Americans to engage in this violence and suppression of political activity,” the executive order states.

By designating Antifa a domestic terrorist organization, the order instructs federal departments and agencies to use all available legal authorities to “investigate, disrupt, and dismantle any and all illegal operations.”

It also calls for prosecuting individuals and organizations accused of providing financial or material support to Antifa operations.

The measure clarifies that its implementation must remain consistent with existing federal law and does not create new legal rights or enforcement avenues against the government itself.

The order directs that it be published in the Federal Register.

Trump and Republican leaders have long argued that Antifa represents a national security threat.

During his first term in office, Trump frequently criticized the group for its role in violent demonstrations.

His administration has since cataloged multiple incidents that officials say highlight the urgency of federal action.

The White House release accompanying the order highlighted several recent cases of Antifa-related violence:

  • In July 2025, Antifa members ambushed officers at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in Alvarado, Texas. After defacing vehicles with anti-ICE graffiti — including phrases such as “ICE pig” and “F— you pigs” — attackers lured officers from the building and opened fire, striking one officer in the neck.
  • Later that month, Antifa-affiliated rioters attacked federal agents at an ICE facility in Portland, Oregon. Officers who had been guarding the facility for weeks were assaulted with kicks, punches, and what officials described as an “incendiary device.”
  • In February 2024, a transgender Antifa member detonated an explosive device outside the office of Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall. The attacker reportedly left behind stickers with Antifa slogans and anarchist symbols.

The administration’s summary of events argues that these incidents demonstrate a pattern of coordinated violence by Antifa cells across the country.

The executive order comes as part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to expand federal tools to counter domestic extremism.

Officials emphasized that while existing laws already allow prosecution of individuals for specific crimes, the formal designation of Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization ensures that federal agencies can prioritize investigations into the group’s activities and disrupt its funding networks.

The White House said a complete list of documented incidents linked to Antifa has been made available on its official website.

President Trump Isn’t Backing Down From Crushing Radical Left Violence by Red Voice News

The move signals a heightened focus on combating organized domestic extremist networks, with the administration stating that agencies are now expected to treat Antifa with the same urgency as other threats to national security.

JD Vance Exposes Soros Cash Behind Leftist Outlet Attacking Charlie Kirk
Left-wing extremism

JD Vance Exposes Soros Cash Behind Leftist Outlet Attacking Charlie Kirk

/

Vice President JD Vance accused The Nation of being funded by George Soros’s Open Society Foundation after the magazine published a controversial article comparing slain Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk to Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels.

The dispute escalated Monday after The Nation’s president denied the claim, despite evidence of substantial past funding from Soros-affiliated groups.

The controversy began when The Nation ran a column by former Gawker editor Elizabeth Spiers titled “Charlie Kirk’s Legacy Deserves No Mourning.”

In the opening of the 1,000-word essay, Spiers labeled Kirk “an unrepentant racist, transphobe, homophobe, and misogynist.”

The piece drew outrage for attempting to tie Kirk, who was assassinated on September 10 at Utah Valley University, to Nazi ideology.

While guest hosting The Charlie Kirk Show, Vance pointed directly at the magazine’s financial backers.

“The Nation isn’t a fringe blog,” Vance said.

“It’s a well-funded, well-respected magazine whose publishing history goes back to the American Civil War. George Soros’s Open Society Foundation funds this magazine.”

The Nation’s president, Bhaskar Sunkara, disputed Vance’s statement in a post to X.

“I’m not sure where he’s getting his information, but JD Vance is lying about The Nation magazine,” Sunkara wrote.

“We’d welcome donations from anyone who respects our editorial independence, but we’re not funded, not one dime, by Soros or Open Society Foundation.”

However, records show Soros-affiliated groups have funneled millions into The Nation’s nonprofit arm.

According to Media Research Center’s NewsBusters, between 2004 and 2019, Soros organizations contributed at least $1,349,000 to The Nation Institute, the nonprofit affiliated with the magazine.

In January 2019, The Nation Institute was rebranded as the Type Media Center, which continued to maintain ties with the publication.

At the time of the rebrand, Type Media Center’s CEO Taya Kitman explained, “When the Nation Institute was founded more than 50 years ago, we were a modest organization affiliated with the Nation Magazine — but that name no longer reflects the breadth and impact of what we do today.”

Despite the new branding, funding has continued.

A 2022 Soros-backed grant of $150,000 was earmarked to “build a more equitable future in the field of public interest journalism by strengthening publishing and independent media.”

The Heir: Inside the (Not So) Secret Network of Alex Soros

Other left-leaning donors also describe the relationship openly.

The MacArthur Foundation awarded a $325,000 grant in 2023, describing Type Media Center as supporting “journalism and nonfiction writing through book publishing, fellowship programs, and The Nation magazine.”

Sunkara’s denial drew sharp responses from conservatives.

Alex Brusewitz, a senior advisor to President Trump, wrote on X: “Your non-profit took over $1 million from George Soros, then you slandered my friend Charlie Kirk while his body was still warm. You are a horrible person.”

Conservative commentator Ryan Girdusky added, “The Nation’s non-profit arm ‘the Nation Institute,’ which paid its journalists salaries, got $1.3 million from Soros.”

Jack Posobiec also weighed in, calling the arrangement “a standard leftist media tactic to hide the money they take from far-left NGO’s.”

While hosting Kirk’s show, Vance also disputed Spiers’s portrayal of Kirk, pointing to her own cited evidence.

“Made an argument for judging people of all races and backgrounds by their own individual merits,” Vance said of Kirk.

“With the very evidence she provides, this hack of a writer shows that she lied about a dead man, and yet she wrote it, an esteemed magazine published it, it made it through the editors and, of course, liberal billionaires rewarded that attack.”

The Nation later issued a correction acknowledging that the article “attributed a quote to Charlie Kirk incorrectly.”

Spiers, the author of the column, previously worked for Gawker, the outlet that filed for bankruptcy in 2012 after being ordered to pay wrestler Hulk Hogan $140 million in damages for publishing a sex tape without consent.

The clash between Vance and The Nation underscores ongoing disputes over media funding, political narratives, and the handling of commentary surrounding Kirk’s assassination.

Trump Eyes Soros Prosecution, Possible RICO Charges in Wake of Charlie Kirk Assassination
George Soros, Founder and Chairman of the Open Society Foundation gives a speech during Economic Forum in Brussels, Belgium on June 1, 2017
Left-wing extremism

Trump Eyes Soros Prosecution, Possible RICO Charges in Wake of Charlie Kirk Assassination

/

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump appeared on FOX and Friends earlier today to address the nationwide manhunt for the suspect in the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

During the interview, the president confirmed that law enforcement had taken the suspect into custody.

In addition to announcing the arrest, President Trump said his administration is preparing to examine potential Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) charges against billionaire George Soros, citing his role in supporting protests and riots across the country.

“We’re going to look into Soros because I think it’s a RICO case against him and other people because this is more than protests. This is real agitation; this is riots on the street — and we’re going to look into that,” Trump said.

The president’s remarks follow similar statements he made in August, prior to Kirk’s assassination at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah.

At that time, Trump argued that Soros and his son, Alex Soros, should face charges under RICO for allegedly financing left-wing movements that he said have escalated into violent riots.

Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, was killed last week when a gunman fired on him during a campus event.

His death has sparked widespread outrage and renewed calls from conservatives for accountability over violent political extremism.

Trump pointed directly at Soros as a central figure in what he described as coordinated efforts to destabilize communities.

Soros’ Open Society Foundations has long been tied to funding political movements and activist groups worldwide.

Critics argue that his support has extended to organizations involved in violent unrest in the United States.

The Heir: Inside the (Not So) Secret Network of Alex Soros

Over the years, Soros has directed funding to groups behind demonstrations ranging from Black Lives Matter protests to anti-Israel movements.

Trump and his allies have accused Soros of using his influence to promote radical left-wing causes, bankroll “dark money” projects, and undermine conservative governments.

According to the Gateway Pundit, Soros-funded Texas Majority PAC is also under investigation for allegedly funneling money to Texas Democrats who left the state in protest of redistricting legislation earlier this year.

Last month, Trump issued a statement calling for both Soros and his son to be prosecuted under RICO.

“They should be charged with RICO because of their support of violent protests, and much more, all throughout the United States of America,” Trump said at the time.

The president reiterated that stance in his interview today, tying the call for prosecution to the broader need for law and order in the wake of Kirk’s death.

Federal authorities have not yet confirmed details about possible charges related to Soros or his organizations.

However, Trump said the administration is reviewing available evidence and will push forward with legal action if the facts support it.

Charlie Kirk’s assassination has become a rallying point for conservatives, with many citing the attack as part of a broader pattern of violence against political figures on the right.

Trump said his administration will continue to pursue justice for Kirk while also targeting what he described as the networks fueling ongoing unrest across the country.

Portland Woman “Lost Her Mind” in Dog Park Showdown Caught on Video
Left-wing extremism

Portland Woman “Lost Her Mind” in Dog Park Showdown Caught on Video

/

A confrontation at Mt. Tabor Park’s dog park has gone viral after video surfaced showing a heated exchange between a woman and another park visitor over his dogs.

The incident, recorded and widely shared on social media, has drawn attention not only for the content of the exchange but also for the woman’s alleged place of employment.

According to the video and accounts from witnesses, the incident began when the woman confronted a man walking what she claimed were purebred dogs.

She accused the man of being a Trump supporter and of backing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) because of his choice of pets. The confrontation escalated when she attempted to involve nearby parkgoers, asking for assistance and alleging that the man was bothering her.

The exchange took place in the park’s designated off-leash dog area, a popular spot for local residents to exercise their pets. Witnesses said the woman made repeated accusations and did not move away from the man during the encounter.

At one point in the recording, she is seen holding up her phone and continuing to speak over the man while calling for bystanders to intervene.

The video quickly gained traction online after being shared by the PDX Real social media account, which frequently posts local news and viral clips.

The individual operating that account later claimed the woman works for Oregon Health Sciences University (OHSU).

While her identity has been determined by some online users, her name has not been released publicly by news outlets.

Observers noted that the confrontation included derogatory language and personal attacks based on political affiliation.

In the video, the woman can be heard connecting the man’s alleged political views to his dog ownership, suggesting that purebred dog ownership was tied to certain political beliefs.

The incident follows a broader trend of viral clips capturing politically charged exchanges in public spaces.

In this case, the recording shows the woman standing close to the man she accused, rather than retreating or leaving the area, which drew additional criticism from online commentators.

One commenter, responding to coverage of the incident, compared it to other recent high-profile confrontations, suggesting that such behavior may have previously been celebrated in certain circles but is now viewed differently.

“A year ago, this guy would have gotten a promotion and maybe a presidential medal of freedom for acting like this. Now he’s unemployed and looking for a lawyer,” the commenter wrote.

While the man involved in the exchange has not been publicly identified, the video continues to circulate widely, prompting discussion about conduct in public spaces, political polarization, and the boundaries of acceptable behavior.

Oregon Health Sciences University has not issued a public statement regarding the matter, and it is unclear whether the institution will take any action in connection to the incident.

Mt. Tabor Park remains open to the public, and no law enforcement response was reported at the scene.

The viral nature of the video has ensured that the incident remains a topic of discussion both locally and beyond, particularly among those concerned about political tensions spilling into everyday interactions.

Liberal Women Lose Last Grip on Sanity Over Big Beautiful Bill
Left-wing extremism

Liberal Women Lose Last Grip on Sanity Over Big Beautiful Bill

/

It’s been seven months since the election of Donald Trump. We’ve had seven months of utter hysteria, lying, and more law-breaking from liberals. What looked like it might be just an extinction burst, a final flare-up and tantrum, appears to be a long-term chronic illness. 

In just these past few months, we’ve had:

– Illegal alien Kilmar Abrego Garcia fought over, and fawned over, by Democrats. The MS-13 gang member had been in the states illegally for years, and is credibly suspected of human trafficking. The liberals? They sent themselves to court, and got on planes to go give him a wellness check in an El Salvador prison to “bring him back home.”

– Ghetto trash like Rep. Jasmine Crockett yelling profanities in ebonics, telling the world that it’s her decision (hers), not President Trump’s, whether the U.S. conducts military strikes. 

– Riots in Los Angeles, led by illegal alien Mexicans, traitorous but unfortunately legal citizens originally from Mexico, and egged on by Democrat politicians trying to target (and let’s admit it; they want them hurt or killed) police officers working for immigration enforcement. 

There’s no end in sight. Now, with the passage of the Republican’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” the usual suspects are having actual psychiatric episodes. The usual suspects are, of course, liberal women. There’s no denying that this population is mentally unwell and obviously dangerous. 

Gaze into crazy eyes. That’s not a joke. Look at this woman’s eyes. In this rant, the young liberal woman fires off rat-a-tat orders (they think they can issue orders to everyone) about what you had “better not do”. You’d better not fly a flag, celebrate Independence Day, or say anything nice about the United States, she says. 

Next up on the unhinged hit parade, another liberal woman with feral eyes. Reporting from her car, she delivers her tirade through flaring nostrils and a tic-like manner, opening with, “Good morning, and f*ck you.” 

You can tell everything you need to know about this woman by noticing her mask of makeup and her smug, arrogant facial pose that opens the video. This “Karen” says that the 4th of July is canceled:

Here’s another mental breakdown conveniently filmed for your viewing pleasure:

Thing is, the rest of America is sick to death of these gorgons. Here’s a sampling of the national mood toward emotionally dysregulated harpies:

Media Baffled By Motorists Who Refuse to Be Dragged Out and Mauled
Left-wing extremism

Media Baffled By Motorists Who Refuse to Be Dragged Out and Mauled

/

You’d suspect that left-wing rioters (no, they’re not “protestors”) are playing a dangerous game with their own lives from watching all the videos of lefties throwing themselves in front of moving cars lately. And it’s reasonable to suspect they are playing a game, they are risking their lives, and they do want to get hit. 

Why would they want to get hit? Because “protestors” live to get paid not in money, but in attention. Specifically, they want to be perceived as victims. You see it in the mentally deranged young girls with purple hair and face metal who throw soup on old masters paintings in museums. You see it in the tweaked out men who glue their hands to roadways to “protest oil,” then sit there in the cat bird seat as cops and rescue workers “have to” rescue them from what they did to themselves. 

The latest trend among left-wing rioters is cropping up a lot in the disorder and violence happening in Los Angeles. The rioters, many of whom are illegal aliens, say they’re “protesting” immigration authorities who are picking up illegal aliens and throwing them out. The law is optional if you’re brown, “oppressed,” or leftist, you see. Most people have seen this video of a man running backward in front of a cop car and refusing to get out of the way until the car hit him, then made a getaway. 

There was another incident on June 15 in Los Angeles, this time with a shrieking young woman in typical leftist poison colors who learned what happens when you join a crowd of people beating on a car. Any sane motorist is not going to sit there and allow a mob to assault them or drag them out of a car, but watch the “activists” scream in horror when the driver won’t just sit still and let them have their way. He ran over the girl’s legs to get away. 

The mainstream media, naturally, is framing these incidents in reverse. They’re treating the actual victim of menacing, the car driver, as the criminal who assaulted an innocent person:

We can probably expect the police and district attorney to ruin the driver’s life and charge him or her with murder because he wouldn’t just take it as the mob beat on his car. Truck driver Reginald Denny made the mistake of not plowing through the crowd during the Rodney King riots of 1992, and the crowd dragged him out of his truck and nearly beat him to death. 

Let’s see what the tweeting public has to say about the latest “hit and run”:

https://twitter.com/Azraels_Brother/status/1934626562768589241

There are always some who blame the person who refuses to become a victim:

Florida Sheriff to Would-Be Rioters: “We Will Kill You”
Left-wing extremism, National Affairs

Florida Sheriff to Would-Be Rioters: “We Will Kill You”

/

The phrase “let me be very clear” has become a staple for politicians on the left who want to sound determined and steadfast while they push through insane policies. When you hear it it’s hard not to plug your ears. But once in a while someone uses it properly in a way that makes you want to listen. 

Wayne Ivey is one of them. The burly crew-cutted cop is the sheriff of Florida’s Brevard County, and he’s not going to be having any nonsense–more on this below. 

What kind of nonsense? The kind of disorder that angry leftists are determined to gin up on Saturday, June 15, with their “No Kings” demonstrations. Yes, it’s about President Donald Trump, who will launch a military parade that day to celebrate the 250th anniversary of America’s armed forces.

The left has decided that everything Trump does in office is a monarchical abuse of power, so they’re joining hands up and down thoroughfares to slow and annoy motorists. Vermont’s hard-left publication Vermont Digger put out a story making the No Kings protest sound like a day of wholesome family fun that will delight onlookers. 

Maybe participants will try to stop motorists from proceeding, as this guy by refusing to get out of the way of an SUV driven by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. His comrades, of course, characterized this as an act of violence by the driver. 

Brevard County’s Wayne Ivey doesn’t care, and he’s not mincing words. In a press conference he listed the consequences that troublemakers can expect. “If you block an intersection or a roadway in Brevard County you are going to jail.”

But then he got really spicy. 

“If you try to mob rule a car in Brevard County – gather around it, refusing to let the driver leave? In our county, you’re most likely gonna get RUN OVER, and dragged across the street,” Ivey said. 

This is the kind of no-baloney law and order talk millions of Americans have been waiting to hear. A sampling of reactions:

There are always a few who think that living in an orderly and safe society is a kind of grisly oppression:


Scroll to Top