Entertainment

Entertainment

Jelly Roll’s Daughter Explodes Over Bunnie Xo Divorce Drama: ‘The Internet’s About to Crumble’ [WATCH]

Jelly Roll’s daughter Bailee Ann DeFord is firing back at online speculation about her father’s split from Bunnie Xo, warning fans they don’t know the full story.

During a fiery TikTok Live on Sunday, the 18-year-old defended her dad with a profanity-filled rant. “Don’t y’all ever come for my father’s name like that again. I’m so done,” she declared.

Visibly upset, she demanded followers stop messaging her about the breakup.

“Get the f–k out of my DMs, out of my comments, my life with that s–t. I don’t care,” she said. “I don’t want to talk about it.”

Despite her anger, DeFord made one thing clear — neither Jelly Roll nor Bunnie Xo cheated during their marriage.

She insisted the real cause behind the divorce would shock those following their story, as reported by Page Six.

“Y’all have no f–king idea what happened, and wait ’till y’all find out. Just f–king wait,” she said on live video.

“Because I promise y’all, the view of what y’all have of not only the situation, but their relationship and the internet in totality is about to f–king crumble the day that I open my mouth.”

She doubled down on her frustration, pointing out that outsiders could never understand what actually happened between the pair.

“It’s not a difference in f–king opinions. Nobody else lived in it, so don’t f–king even. I’m for real so done,” she added.

This isn’t the first time DeFord has pushed back against online chatter.

Last month, she posted a now-expired TikTok expressing disgust at how invested strangers were in what she called “a very clearly private family matter.”

In that earlier post, she reprimanded commenters for prying into their lives. “Worry ’bout your house — not mine,” she wrote. “I’m not speaking on it — yet.”

As speculation swirled, DeFord tried to encourage civility. In a later TikTok update, she pleaded for understanding from followers amid what she described as a wave of hostility.

“I will never forget those of you that have showed me empathy when I’m seeing a lot of hate. Thank you. So much,” she said sincerely.

“And to everyone else, I hope humanity can evolve to a place where kindness comes first.”

She acknowledged that public figures often face scrutiny but urged fans to maintain decency.

“I understand & respect opinions and that a public profile is a public profile, but that doesn’t have to mean we throw away our human decency,” she added.

Jelly Roll shares Bailee Ann with his ex Felicia Beckwith. The singer also has a nine-year-old son, Noah, with Melisa Ann Cowell.

Page Six confirmed that Jelly Roll, 41, quietly filed for divorce from Bunnie Xo, 46, on May 18 in Williamson County, Tennessee, ending nearly a decade of marriage. The split was finalized last Friday.

Even so, Bunnie revealed on her “Dumb Blonde” podcast that she and Jelly Roll still hope to have a baby together after she underwent IVF treatments.

According to the couple’s marital dissolution agreement obtained by Page Six, the exes proceeded with those plans despite separate legal warnings about the potential effects on their divorce settlement.

Bailee Ann’s statements add a volatile new layer to an already dramatic celebrity breakup.

For now, though, she’s keeping the details to herself — and the internet is left waiting, just as she warned, for everything to “crumble” when she finally decides to speak.

Entertainment

Pissed Ed Harris Unloads on ‘Dutton Ranch’ Role: ‘Get Me the F–k Out’

Ed Harris is not holding back about his frustrations with his role on the “Yellowstone” spinoff “Dutton Ranch.”

In a candid interview with Variety published Monday, the Oscar nominee said he felt “underused” in his role as Everett McKinney and admitted he was “pissed” about how his character turned out, as reported by Page Six.

The 75‑year‑old actor revealed that he eventually asked his team to “get him the f–k out of” the series “midway through” filming its first season, saying he was “a little bit misled” about what the project would be.

Speaking at the “Dink” premiere in Los Angeles, Harris said that before signing on, he was told he would be one of four main characters with a major storyline.

“Prior to signing on for it, I was talked to quite a bit about what the season was and what my character was going to do — and that I was one of the four main characters,” Harris recalled. “And that wasn’t really the case.”

He said that when he voiced his concerns about feeling “inconsequential” during production, they were largely ignored.

The actor explained that the “thing that really pissed [him] off” came when a singing scene he had been promised was cut from the show.

“They didn’t show it. They said it was too up for the dark ending of that episode,” he told the outlet. “That, to me, was reason enough to say, ‘I’m voiding my contract.’”

Harris said his reaction to the decision was blunt.

“I [was like], ‘F**k you people.’ That’s all I’ve got to say.”

Despite his anger, the Emmy nominee remains attached to Season 2, which begins filming next year. He said he’s been assured that his character will “have a little bit more to do.”

Reflecting on the show’s first season, Harris admitted that while Everett McKinney turned out to be “relatively important to the story,” it “didn’t feel that way” during filming.

Representatives for Taylor Sheridan or Paramount did not respond to requests for comment.

The comments come a month after Sheridan himself made waves for criticizing studio executives on the “Bill Simmons Podcast.”

The “Landman” creator complained about the way the industry has changed, saying that creative freedom once given to writers and directors has been replaced with “endless rewrites” and meetings over “tone and mood.”

Sheridan, 57, reportedly clashed with Paramount before signing a deal with NBCUniversal last year.

Harris’s blunt words have sparked heated discussion online, with some fans empathizing with his frustration while others questioned his expectations for the show.

Entertainment

Judge Halts Paramount and Warner Bros. $81 Billion Merger After Democrat AGs’ Lawsuit [WATCH]

A federal judge has temporarily stopped the multibillion-dollar merger between Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery after a coalition of twelve Democratic state attorneys general filed a lawsuit to block the deal, as reported by Breitbart.

The order, issued Monday by District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín, pauses the transaction for at least two weeks while the states pursue their legal challenge.

The states, led by California, are suing to halt Paramount’s proposed $81 billion acquisition of Warner.

Paramount Advisers Urge California Exit After State Moves to Block Warner Bros Discovery Merger

They argue that the merger would “extinguish competition” in Hollywood and reduce options for movie and television consumers across the country.

The coalition asked both companies to delay the merger until the court could fully review their case. When the companies declined, the attorneys general filed for a temporary restraining order, which the judge granted.

This preliminary action could lead to a longer injunction if the states succeed in convincing the court that the deal is anticompetitive.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta celebrated the ruling, calling it “a critical first win in our case to ensure this megamerger never sees the light of day.”

He warned that allowing a small number of corporations to dominate major industries historically leads to reduced opportunities and diminished product quality for the public.

The merger would unite two of Hollywood’s last five legacy studios and combine their vast entertainment holdings under a single corporate umbrella.

Warner’s HBO Max service, franchises including “Harry Potter,” and CNN would be paired with Paramount’s CBS, “Top Gun,” and its Paramount+ streaming platform.

Paramount has not yet commented on the judge’s ruling. However, the company previously said it would “vigorously defend” its acquisition of Warner, calling the states’ claims “wrong on both the facts and the law.”

Paramount contends the merger would enhance rather than hinder competition and highlighted the regulatory approvals it has already obtained, including one from the administration of President Donald Trump last month.

The restraining order halts any progress on the merger for at least 14 days. That pause could be extended for up to 28 days, depending on further court proceedings.

A hearing on the states’ motion for a preliminary injunction is currently scheduled for August 3, though that date might be delayed.

The timing is critical. Industry observers expected Paramount and Warner to attempt to finalize the deal later this week. Before Monday’s decision, the companies proposed completing an injunction hearing by late August to allow time for an appeal before September 30.

That deadline matters because Paramount has agreed to pay shareholders a “ticking fee” of about $7 million per day if the merger is not finalized by then.

State officials argue that such pressure reflects Paramount’s business risk, not a valid reason to rush the court’s process.

They maintain that an extended discovery period would be necessary to fully examine the merger’s impact. In Friday’s hearing, they proposed starting a full trial in April 2027 to accommodate proper evidence gathering.

Factoring in debt, Paramount’s planned purchase of Warner carries an estimated total value of close to $111 billion based on existing shares.

Beyond California, the states participating in the lawsuit include Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Washington.

Additional opposition has emerged from industry groups such as the Writers Guild of America, which is also suing to block the merger.

The guild and the state attorneys general share concerns that the consolidation could give one company excessive control over creative and distribution markets.

For now, the deal remains in limbo as both companies await the next hearing. The outcome will likely shape the future of competition across the entertainment industry, which is already under scrutiny for its concentration of ownership.

Entertainment

Travis Scott Caught in Bottle-Throwing Chaos at Exclusive Club

Travis Scott and his entourage were reportedly involved in a bottle-throwing altercation at the ultra-exclusive Zero Bond club on Saturday night, according to Page Six.

Sources told the outlet that the “Sicko Mode” rapper was in attendance to watch a performance by 50 Cent at the Noho venue when tensions flared.

The conflict allegedly began after Scott believed that another guest was filming him. He reportedly approached the individual, and things quickly turned hostile.

According to sources, bottles were thrown during the incident, although it remains unclear whether Scott himself was responsible for launching any or if the chaos was sparked by others in his entourage.

Security personnel immediately intervened, managing to break up the fight before it escalated further.

No police or paramedics were called to the scene, suggesting that the matter ended quickly and without serious injury.

An insider described the situation as brief but intense, saying, “It all happened really fast. It started fast and broke up really quickly.”

The evening’s event was reportedly a private “buyout” hosted by the chicken chain Raising Cane’s rather than a typical night arranged by Zero Bond staff.

Zero Bond, known for hosting elite members and high-profile celebrities including Taylor Swift and former mayor Eric Adams, did not provide a comment following the disturbance.

Representatives for Scott and Raising Cane’s also did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

This latest altercation adds to a string of public scuffles associated with the artist at lavish gatherings in recent years.

Past reports have linked Scott to disruptions at Michael Rubin’s white party and a glamorous amfAR gala after-party held on a yacht.

Despite the commotion, 50 Cent’s performance reportedly continued without interruption, signaling that the entertainment went on as planned for the rest of the attendees.

The incident underscores how quickly high-profile events can spiral when celebrities and exclusive settings collide.

Witnesses emphasized the rapid escalation and equally swift resolution, noting that calm returned soon after security stepped in.

As of now, there are no reports of property damage or injuries resulting from the brief bottle-throwing frenzy inside the members-only club.

Entertainment

Hulk Hogan’s NYC Bar Nearly Collapsed After His Death — Until Son Nick Revived It

A dream years in the making almost ended before it began. A New York nightlife veteran’s $7 million vision for a Hulk Hogan-themed sports bar nearly fell apart after the WWE icon’s death, but Nick Hogan has stepped in to make sure his father’s final project comes to life, as reported by Page Six.

Rich Rosen, a veteran of the city’s hospitality scene, told Page Six he was in disbelief when Hulk Hogan agreed to partner with him on Slam, a sprawling three-story sports bar set across from Madison Square Garden.

He called the location “the Hulkster’s spiritual home,” the place where the wrestling legend secured his legacy.

Rosen said he first connected with Hogan through nothing more than persistence and a bold pitch.

In June 2025, he described how he waited in line for hours at an autograph signing just to get a few seconds to propose his idea.

“I basically waited five hours on line to get two seconds with Hulk Hogan,” he recalled.

“I came with an 8-by-11 glossy picture of Madison Square Garden, and in the picture is our [storefront].”

Rosen continued that he told the superstar, “That’s my [storefront], that’s the Garden, and you’re my new partner.”

The unlikely meeting worked. Hogan agreed to collaborate, and the pair began planning the multimillion-dollar venue together.

But just as construction and preparations were gaining momentum, tragedy struck. The wrestling legend died of a heart attack that July at 71, leaving Rosen and investors stunned and unsure if Slam would ever open its doors.

“When I got the news, I was devastated,” Rosen told Page Six a year later. He said he feared the loss of Hogan might also spell the end of the project they built together.

However, the late wrestler’s son, Nick Hogan, chose to carry the torch. “It wasn’t even a question,” Nick told Page Six.

“This was always happening. If anything, it has a greater purpose now than ever.”

Rosen confirmed that after Hogan’s passing, Nick officially joined as vice president of American Sports Bar Entertainment.

In that role, he became the public face of the brand and the driving force behind realizing his father’s dream.

According to both men, Slam will serve as a tribute to Hulk Hogan’s career and energy, designed to capture the spectacle of wrestling fandom with a modern sports bar atmosphere.

The venue aims to be both a hangout spot for fans and a lasting homage to the late legend’s charisma.

Rosen described the partnership with Nick as both emotional and inspiring, saying it allowed the project to push forward with renewed meaning.

He credited the younger Hogan’s involvement for keeping the team motivated and focused.

Plans are now in motion for a grand opening scheduled later this year. Organizers are preparing a weeklong celebration, which Rosen and Nick say will honor the WWE champion’s larger-than-life personality and his lasting impact on the world of entertainment.

The team behind Slam hopes visitors will experience not only a premium sports destination but also the enduring presence of a figure who defined generations of wrestling fans.

Both Rosen and Nick emphasized that the bar’s mission now extends beyond business, serving as a living tribute to the Hulkster himself.

For fans who grew up idolizing Hogan’s persona, the project stands as one final show of strength — a symbolic comeback from the edge of defeat.

And with Nick Hogan commanding the next round, Slam appears ready to step into the spotlight at last.

Entertainment

Adam Carolla Exposes How Government Terrorizes Taxpayers While Ignoring Billion-Dollar Fraud

Comedian and commentator Adam Carolla criticized what he described as excessive and intrusive government inspections on private construction projects, arguing that ordinary taxpayers face far stricter scrutiny than other areas that receive far less oversight.

Carolla shared personal experiences involving building inspectors showing up unannounced to his own projects and immediately halting work, even for minor repairs. He described inspectors entering job sites without warning and demanding documentation on the spot.

“But here’s what I was thinking when it comes to your job site, and these guys are fanatical about inspections,” Carolla said.

“Meaning, I have done more than one project where an inspector just pulled up on his own accord, got out of his car, walked onto the job site, into my house in one case, and onto another building and another case, and literally went, what’s going on?”

Carolla said the inspectors immediately asserted authority and began questioning workers and homeowners.

“And we’re like, who are you? Yeah, I’m a building inspector. What is going who’s in charge here?” he recalled.

He said inspectors quickly moved to permit enforcement.

“And you go, who’s the homeowner? I go, I don’t know. You got permit for this? No, you don’t have a permit for what’s going on here.”

According to Carolla, even routine fixes triggered shutdowns.

“Well, I was just fixing the drywall. Shut it down. Shut it down, right?” he said.

“You on that ladder, get down. You go home. Everyone goes home.”

He described inspectors ordering all work to stop until paperwork was approved.

“And when you get your when you get your plans together, and you get your permit, and you get your whatever, you can come back and see me until then, there’s nothing going on here. Now get out,” Carolla said.

“He’s standing in my house telling me, shut it down. That’s what they do.”

Carolla said building inspectors leave no room for flexibility and require full compliance even after work is completed.

“Deputy inspectors, building inspectors, by the way, there is no sliding anything past them,” he said.

“There’s no Well, we closed up the wall. Why didn’t inspect the electrical wiring. Well, take my word for it, no, take the drywall back off the wall.”

He contrasted that level of scrutiny with what he claimed is far looser oversight in other areas.

“But when it comes to Somali daycare centers, Somali daycare centers, not nearly as stringent, right? Nope, no, that’s nothing,” Carolla said.

Carolla also pointed to other government programs he believes lack comparable enforcement.

“When it comes to you, taxpayer building your own home at your own expense. They are up your ass, 24/7, nonstop,” he said.

“And when it comes to overseeing covid checks going to prisoners, not so much inspection, going on. Notice that?”

WATCH:

Entertainment

Hollywood Actress and Kamala Voter Breaks With the Left on Venezuela Reality

Actress and activist Sara Foster publicly addressed the ongoing situation in Venezuela, calling on critics to focus on the country’s humanitarian crisis rather than framing recent developments solely through a political lens.

In a detailed statement, Foster said she has spent more than a decade directly assisting Venezuelan families by helping provide food, medicine, and other basic necessities.

She emphasized that her involvement long predates the current political moment and is rooted in personal relationships with families living under extreme conditions.

“I did not vote for Trump, not that I was excited to vote for Kamala, but I did,” Foster said.

“But what I have done is facilitate food, medicine, basic essentials for children in Venezuela.”

Foster said her work in Venezuela spans more than ten years and includes sustained contact with families facing severe deprivation.

“For over 10 years, I have developed close relationships with families there, with mothers there who have watched their children die because you cannot imagine the conditions in Venezuela,” she said.

“You cannot imagine parents unable to get the basic essentials for their children.”

She described speaking directly with mothers who experienced the loss of their children inside their own homes, stressing that the reality on the ground is often misunderstood by outsiders.

“I spoke to families, to mothers who watch their children die on the floors of their home,” Foster said.

“You cannot imagine.”

Foster noted that she has been publicly posting and speaking about Venezuela and Nicolás Maduro for more than a decade, long before the current attention on the country.

“I’ve been posting about Maduro and the state of Venezuela for a very long time, over 10 years,” she said.

Addressing critics directly, Foster urged people to understand the humanitarian situation before assigning political motives or criticizing reactions to recent events.

“So before you sit and criticize and I can’t pretend to know how this will impact America, I’m honestly just so focused on the relief I feel for the people of Venezuela,” she said.

She pushed back against framing the situation as a partisan issue tied to U.S. politics.

“So before you want to politicize this and make this a Trump thing, look into the conditions and the quality of life for how people have been surviving and living in Venezuela,” Foster said.

Foster described the current moment in Venezuela as a turning point for ordinary citizens, rejecting the idea that the country is under occupation.

“Venezuela is not occupied today,” she said.

“Venezuela is liberated today.”

She encouraged critics to research the situation independently.

“Truly learn about it,” Foster said.

“Read about it again.”

Foster also acknowledged that geopolitical motivations, including oil interests, may play a role in the broader situation, but said that does not negate the immediate impact on Venezuelans.

“I am not saying that this isn’t for the oil all that okay, maybe it is,” she said.

“Maybe it’s truly sinister, but for the people of Venezuela today, this is a good thing. This is a good thing.”

WATCH:

 

Entertainment

Rob Schneider Issues a Blunt Warning to America While Honoring Charlie Kirk

Actor and comedian Rob Schneider delivered a wide-ranging statement reflecting on the influence of Charlie Kirk, arguing that Kirk’s work challenged foundational assumptions among young Americans whilehighlighting what Schneider described as the fragile state of freedom in the United States.

Schneider said Kirk played a pivotal role for university students across the country by questioning ideas that many had taken for granted and by framing America as central to the survival of Western civilization.

“Charlie did for me what he did for so many university students across this country. He dismantled foundational thinking,” Schneider said.

“He understood that America is now the keystone of Western civilization. However, he also knew how precarious it was and that it would take only one generation to lose it.”

Schneider said Kirk consistently warned that Americans should not expect outside forces to preserve the nation if it falters.

“He said no one is coming to save us. There will be no Marines from some other country landing on our beaches. There will be no Marshall Plan to financially bail us out. We are the Marines,” Schneider said.

According to Schneider, Kirk framed the moment as a decisive one in human history, with the survival of individual liberty at stake.

“So the question is simply this, will America be a temporary experiment in human history, a brief moment where freedom for the individual enjoyed by relatively few people in human history, before it returns to some brutal feudal system where individual freedom is lost to a world government with complete control,” Schneider said, adding that preserving freedom would require more than “political posturing.”

Schneider said Kirk believed faith was essential to sustaining liberty and warned that freedom cannot survive when it is detached from deeper moral foundations.

“Charlie understood something fundamental without faith, freedom becomes fragile. Our roots must be rooted in something higher than government, and he warned us, a civilization that abandons God will deteriorate and ultimately collapse from the inside out,” Schneider said.

Schneider also recalled Kirk’s emphasis on the dangers of dehumanizing political opponents and the importance of maintaining dialogue.

“Charlie said, when you stop having a human connection with someone you disagree with, it becomes a lot easier to want to commit violence against that group,” Schneider said.

“What we as a culture have to get back to, he said, is to be able to have reasonable disagreement where violence is not an option.”

He described the current state of the country as a “cold civil war” and said Kirk believed debate and dialogue were necessary to prevent further escalation.

“Now we are in a cold civil war right now, but we must do everything in our power to make sure that this doesn’t become an actual hot Civil War, and we must do that with dialog and debate,” Schneider said. “We must let the better nature that each of us have rise to the surface.”

Schneider contrasted public reaction to Kirk’s death with episodes of unrest in recent years.

“I want to point out that after Charlie was murdered, no American cities were burned to the ground, no cars were set ablaze. No looting took place. The only burning was candles, candles to honor someone who dearly loved our country and fought passionately to preserve these unique liberties that so many have fought and died for,” he said.

Schneider then drew a historical parallel to Telemachus, a priest killed in 404 AD after opposing violent spectacles, and compared that moment to Kirk’s actions on college campuses.

“In 404 AD, the crowd killed the priest because he told them the truth. He told them to stop enjoying the blood sport,” Schneider said.

“In 2025 Charlie Kirk jumped into our modern Coliseum, the arena of the university campus. He stood between the mob and their rage, he handed the crowd a microphone. He gave his opponents a voice.”

Schneider said Kirk sought to redirect hostility toward faith and dialogue rather than violence.

“He sat there, told the truth, took their fury and tried to move them and our nation closer to God and closer to our Savior, Jesus Christ, and they killed him for it,” Schneider said.

He expressed hope that Kirk’s death would mark a turning point similar to the end of gladiatorial games in ancient Rome.

“May Charlie Kirk’s death be what Telemachus death was. May it be the end of the games, the end of the spectacle, the end of the blood sport,” Schneider said.

Schneider said Kirk wanted to be remembered for his faith and courage.

“Charlie said he wanted to be remembered for courage and faith, and he will be always,” Schneider said.

“And though we lost him way too soon, Charlie Kirk knew you don’t kill a Christian. You only change his address.”

WATCH:

Entertainment

Pulp Fiction, The Mask Actor Found Dead With Injuries in Bloody Manhattan Apartment

Actor Peter Greene, known for his roles in Pulp Fiction and The Mask, was found dead last week inside his Lower East Side apartment in Manhattan, with injuries on his body and blood throughout the residence, according to law enforcement sources, as reported by Page Six. Greene was 60 years old.

Authorities discovered Greene lying face down with a facial injury inside his apartment on Dec. 12.

Law enforcement sources told TMZ on Thursday that the actor had “some injuries” on his body, but investigators have not yet determined what caused them.

An official cause of death has not been released by the New York City Medical Examiner’s Office.

The New York Police Department has not publicly detailed whether the injuries were the result of an accident, medical event, or foul play.

Page Six reported that it reached out to Greene’s representative and the NYPD for comment, but no response has been confirmed.

A neighbor who spoke to the New York Daily News described the scene inside Greene’s apartment as graphic.

“There was blood everywhere,” the neighbor said. The neighbor also claimed that a handwritten note was discovered at the scene alongside Greene’s body.

According to the neighbor, the note read: “I’m still a Westie,” a reference to the Irish-American gang that operated in Manhattan’s Hell’s Kitchen neighborhood during the 1970s.

Authorities have not confirmed the note’s significance or whether it is connected to Greene’s death.

Greene, a New York native, appeared in numerous films and television productions throughout his career, including his portrayal of Zed in Quentin Tarantino’s Pulp Fiction.

He was also known for roles in The Mask, Training Day, and Laws of Attraction.

The actor had previously spoken publicly about his struggles with drug addiction and a past suicide attempt. However, those close to Greene have said they saw no signs that he was suicidal in the days leading up to his death.

Gregg Edwards, Greene’s former manager, told Page Six that the actor appeared to be in a positive frame of mind shortly before he died.

“Not at all,” Edwards said when asked whether Greene had seemed suicidal. Edwards added that Greene was in “good spirits on Wednesday,” just two days before he was found dead.

Friends also stated that Greene had been actively making plans for the upcoming holidays. New York-based actor and musician Skam Dust said Greene was planning to spend New Year’s Eve with him and others.

“He was going to rent a truck limousine, and Peter’s vision was that we were going to go bar hopping and restaurant hopping. He wasn’t suicidal,” Skam Dust said.

He added that the plans included spending time with Danny Diablo, also known as Lord Ezec, and graffiti writer MQ.

Investigators have not announced whether the death is being treated as suspicious, and no arrests have been made.

The Medical Examiner’s findings are expected to play a key role in determining the circumstances surrounding Greene’s death.

As of now, the investigation remains ongoing, with authorities awaiting toxicology results and further forensic analysis.

Entertainment

Hollywood Legend Calls Out California’s Voting Circus After His Ballot Was Rejected

Actor Kelsey Grammer said he believes Democrats relied on changes to election procedures to win recent elections, pointing to comments he attributes to actress Jane Fonda and to his own experience voting in California during the 2020 election.

Grammer said his concerns began after recalling remarks he said Fonda made during the COVID-19 pandemic, when lockdowns and expanded mail-in voting were implemented across the country.

LOS ANGELES, CA – July 31, 2018: Kelsey Grammer at the Los Angeles premiere of “Like Father” at the Arclight Theatre

According to Grammer, those comments suggested the pandemic and voting changes were necessary to defeat the sitting president.

“I remember when Jane Fonda was talking about the the lockdown and covid 19. She said, if we can’t figure out how to unseat this president with a pandemic and the stuff that we all the power and the and the mail in ballots, she said it right out loud. She said, well, then we we’re ridiculous. We’re like incomple We’re incapable of winning an election,” Grammer said.

“And she was right that, but that is what they needed to win it.”

Grammer said he did not previously believe Democrats would manipulate election systems but said his view changed after observing voting practices in California.

He criticized the state’s election laws, arguing they allow widespread participation without sufficient safeguards.

“I didn’t used to believe that. I didn’t believe the Democrats would ever resort to that, but in watching it, the vote practice, the voting practices that they’ve implemented here in California to allow anybody to vote, as long as they’re just, you know, walking around and have a heartbeat is staggering,” Grammer said.

“And they have no interest in it being legal, none at all.”

Grammer went further, claiming that voting systems allow ballots to be cast multiple times and even by individuals who should no longer be listed as eligible voters.

“And for those who do not have a heartbeat but haven’t been dropped in the roles, they want them to vote too, and they’ll even let them vote several times,” he said.

Grammer also described a personal experience he said occurred during the 2020 election when he attempted to deliver his mail-in ballot directly to a polling location.

He said he wanted to ensure the ballot was received and counted.

“But I walked into the vote my voting, my polling place for the 2020 election. And I said, Listen, I thought I just bring this in. This is my mail in ballot. I wanted to bring it in and make sure you guys got it,” Grammer said.

According to Grammer, a poll worker informed him that his ballot was not valid after checking the system.

“The girl looked at me. She said she punched a couple of buttons and said, Oh, that’s That’s not legal. Your your ballot is illegal. It’s invalid,” Grammer said.

Grammer said he asked for an explanation but was not given one and was instead offered a provisional ballot.

“I said, why? And she said, No reason. You can fill out a provisional ballot, if you’d like,” he said.

Grammer said he then attempted to present identification to resolve the issue, but was told that accepting identification was not allowed under California law.

“So I reached in my pocket, I still let me give you some ID, and she said, Oh no, no, it’s against the law for me to take ID,” Grammer said.

He said the experience left him uncertain about whether his vote would be counted and reinforced his concerns about the state’s election system.

“So I thought, well, it’s mixed up,” Grammer said.

Grammer said he later received confirmation that the ballot was not counted.

“And I did finally get noticed about a year and a half ago that that ballot was not counted,” he said.

“So maybe I was just a registered Republican.”

WATCH:


Scroll to Top