Democrats

lev radin / Shutterstock.com

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Wednesday that he will be exposing the identities of ICE agents in what appeared to be a shocking publicity stunt, threatening the lives and wellbeing of possibly thousands of law enforcement officers and their families.

ICE agents have been using face masks during operations to protect themselves and their loved ones from retribution by cartels and terrorist organizations, as well as other nefarious actors, due to a horrific 413% increase in violence against ICE agents, according to reports from Newsweek and Turning Point USA.

“People are out there taking photos of the names, their faces, and posting them online with death threats to their family and themselves,” Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons explained in a press conference in early June.

Jeffries Doesn’t Care About Protecting Americans

“Every single ICE agent who’s engaged in this aggressive overreach and are trying to hide their identities from the American people will be unsuccessful in doing that,” Jeffries said of the situation.

“This is America. This is not the Soviet Union,” he added. “We’re not behind the Iron Curtain. This is not the 1930s. And every single one of them, no matter what it takes, no matter how long it takes, will of course be identified.” It is fair to presume that if Jeffries has his way, ICE agents and their families would be at even greater risk of horrific violence, particularly from cartels and terrorist organizations.

Jeffries is among a growing cohort of Democrats who will likely throw their hats in the ring for the 2028 presidential election. We strongly encourage you to watch this clip of him and ask yourself if you’d feel safer in an America run by him, his friends, and his policies?

Watch The Full Clip:

Please visit Million Voices for more articles like this.

President Donald Trump triggered CNN after describing the Los Angeles anti-ICE rioters as “insurrectionists” while talking to the press.

When Trump was asked whether he believes those causing the trouble are people ICE is trying to deport or if they are professional agitators, he said, “The people that are causing the problem are professional agitators.”

“They’re insurrectionists. They’re bad people. They should be in jail.”

CNN’s Dana Bash quickly responded to Trump’s comments.

“That word he used, they’re insurrectionists. I can’t imagine that that was an accident because it seems as though that is the place White House is trying to get, and for the president it’s icing on the cake he can do it in California because on a whole host of issues he has had California, Gavin Newsom in particular in his sights,” she said.

Watch:

Panelist Stephen Collinson responded:

“This is a very serious word that is being thrown around now, ‘insurrection’. That’s a rebellion of States or people in the states against federal government.”

Collinson continued:

“That is not something to be trifled with. If for example, to your point, the President were to invoke the Insurrection Act, I think we would have yet another legal morass.”

“It will be another instance of the way that the White House is trying to declare emergencies or insurrections in order to unlock vast powers which most presidents don’t have access to.”

In other words, they are claiming Trump wants the insurrection.

During the same media interaction, Trump said that he would arrest California Governor Gavin Newsom.

“I would do it if I were Tom (Homan). I think it’s great,” Trump said.

“Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing.”

“He’s done a terrible job. Look, I like Gavin Newsom.”

“He’s a nice guy, but he’s grossly incompetent. Everybody knows.”

“All you have to do is look at the little railroad he’s building. It’s about 100 times over budget,” Trump further urged.

Watch:

Please visit The Daily Fetched for more stories like this.

Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairman Ken Martin said he is considering stepping down amid growing frustration over Vice Chairman David Hogg’s efforts to target sitting Democratic lawmakers with primary challenges.

The clash is part of increasing internal divisions within the Democratic Party following President Donald Trump’s election victory.

Martin’s concerns were aired during a Zoom meeting in which he voiced opposition to Hogg’s political tactics.

Martin’s remarks revealed the deep divisions behind the scenes at the DNC.

“I’ll be very honest with you, for the first time in my 100 days on this job … the other night I said to myself for the first time, I don’t know if I wanna do this anymore,” Martin said in a two-minute recording provided to Politico.

He also added that his ability to lead had been undermined.

The DNC is scheduled to vote on whether to re-run elections for certain leadership roles currently held by Hogg and fellow party officer Malcolm Kenyatta, RVM News reported.

Those issues have limited opportunities for women candidates, according to Politico.

Martin, who was elected as DNC chair in February and previously chaired Minnesota’s Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, has faced growing internal pressure amid ideological disputes between moderate and far-left factions in the party.

“I’m trying to get my sea legs underneath of me and actually develop any amount of credibility so I can go out there and raise the money and do the job I need to to put ourselves in a position to win,” Martin said to Hogg during the May 15 meeting.

“And again, I don’t think you intended this, but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to. So it’s really frustrating.”

Watch:

The latest infighting stems from Hogg’s announced plans to spend $20 million on primary challenges against incumbent Democrats he considers insufficiently committed to progressive causes.

Hogg, who rose to national attention as a gun control activist following the 2018 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, prompted backlash from Democratic leaders who feared it would deepen internal divisions and threaten vulnerable seats.

Hogg later pledged $100,000 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) to ease tensions.

Martin delivered an ultimatum to Hogg in May regarding the primary effort.

“Party officers have one job: to be fair stewards of a process that invites every Democrat to the table — regardless of personal views or allegiances,” Martin reportedly told Hogg.

The internal conflict inside the Democratic Party continues.

Watch:

Please visit The Daily Fetched for more stories like this.

Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs is facing criticism after vetoing legislation that would have blocked the Chinese government and its affiliates from acquiring land near key military and infrastructure sites in the state.

The vetoed measure, Senate Bill 1109, passed the legislature but was rejected by Hobbs on Tuesday, prompting backlash from Republican lawmakers and national security advocates.

State Senate Majority Leader Janae Shamp condemned the veto, calling it a “politically motivated” move that puts Arizonans at risk.

“This is utterly insane,” Shamp said.

“Governor Hobbs is an obstructionist against safeguarding our citizens from threats.”

SB 1109 sought to prohibit the People’s Republic of China from acquiring a 30% or greater ownership stake in any Arizona property.

The legislation was introduced in response to growing concerns over Chinese interests purchasing land near sensitive U.S. military installations, including Luke Air Force Base, Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, and facilities owned by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).

Governor Hobbs defended her decision by arguing that the bill would not have accomplished its intended security goals.

“This bill is ineffective at counter-espionage and does not directly protect our military assets,” Hobbs stated in her veto letter.

She also criticized the legislation for lacking “clear implementation criteria,” which she said could result in “arbitrary enforcement.”

Michael Lucci, founder and CEO of State Armor Action, a policy group focused on state-level security legislation, strongly disagreed with Hobbs’ assessment.

“Governor Hobbs’s veto of SB 1109 hangs an ‘Open for the CCP’ sign on Arizona’s front door,” Lucci said.

“Allowing Communist China to buy up land near our critical assets is a national security risk, plain and simple, and Governor Hobbs is substantively and completely wrong.”

Lucci also pointed to global examples of strategic vulnerability, referencing Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian military infrastructure.

“Proximity produces peril in asymmetric warfare,” he said, reinforcing the concern that even limited foreign land ownership near critical infrastructure could pose significant risk.

The bill underwent a bipartisan amendment process prior to its passage in the legislature.

Originally, it broadly prohibited entities and individuals deemed national security risks from purchasing land in Arizona.

Lawmakers later narrowed the language to target Chinese government-linked companies and their subsidiaries, in an effort to avoid concerns of discrimination.

Despite Hobbs’ objections, the Arizona legislature retains the ability to override the veto.

It is currently unclear whether Republican lawmakers will attempt such a move or if they have sufficient support to do so.

Arizona is not alone in confronting the issue of foreign land purchases near strategic U.S. sites. According to the nonprofit Committee of 100, which monitors China-related policies, at least 27 states are considering a total of 84 bills this year to limit foreign ownership of land.

So far, 22 states have passed similar laws, 17 of which were enacted in 2024.

At the federal level, Congress is also reviewing legislation designed to restrict foreign entities, particularly those affiliated with the Chinese government, from owning land near military or critical infrastructure.

As of March, seven separate bills on the matter were being considered in both chambers.

The veto of SB 1109 has now placed Arizona at the center of the national debate on how to counter foreign influence through land acquisitions.

Lawmakers and national security advocates continue to call for stricter measures to limit such purchases, arguing that real estate ownership near sensitive sites could be exploited for espionage or sabotage.

Please visit Drew Berquist.com for more articles like this.

Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) has vowed to pursue an impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump if she becomes chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

This month, Democrats will elect their new ranking member following the recent death of Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA), who died of esophageal cancer.

Crockett entered the race to replace Connolly as the party’s top representative on the committee on Tuesday.

In a letter to Democrats obtained by Politico, Crockett said:

“Our country is in an existential crisis driven by an out-of-control Executive with a flagrant disregard for our Constitution, our way of governance, and our very way of life as citizens of a democratic republic.

We must pull back the curtain on the unmitigated chaos under Trump 2.0 and translate our findings to the American people in a way they can digest.”

Crockett emphasized during an interview with WFAA that she would wield her power as Oversight chair if the Democrats win back the majority in the House:

“Once we get to the majority, which I’m hoping and praying we get to, next cycle, that allows me to start to open up and do the things that would look like an impeachment,” the lawmaker said.

“Now, whether or not we would put it to a vote, you know, he’s been impeached twice, couldn’t get convicted.

There’s a lot of things to consider about whether or not to go forward.”

On going after Trump, Crockett said:

“I would absolutely at least do an inquiry.

Absolutely. I think that there’s more than enough to inquire about.”

Citing the Qatari government’s gifting of a luxury Boeing 747 jet to Trump, Crockett alleged “crypto nonsense” and “pardons for play,” adding there are numerous issues she wants to “dig into.”

The congresswoman becomes the fourth Democrat to enter the race to become the committee’s next ranking member, following Reps. Stephen Lynch (D-MA), Robert Garcia (D-CA), and Kweisi Mfume (D-MD).

Crockett added:

“If we didn’t have such a lawless administration, then I wouldn’t be running.”

Please visit The Daily Fetched for more stories like this.

“I love young men. I love frat guys,” says Olivia Julianna on a podcast discussing how the Democrat party can win back the young male vote. 

You could be forgiven for suspecting she meant to add, “On toasted rye with swiss and extra mayonnaise.”

Miss Julianna, you see, is a very ample woman. That’s a polite way of saying she’s enormously fat.  Oh, yes, it’s true. We’re not supposed to make fun of people for being ugly, or fat, or for dressing up like an alien lunatic. But those rules were written in a time (it’s within living memory) that we weren’t also told by everyone on the left that being an enormous hambeast was not only healthful but beautiful, that ugly people were gorgeous, and that green hair was the height of feminine seduction. We’re told all those things now by a left-leaning America that uses transvestites to sell lingerie to women and who says not wanting to die early from excess weight is “fatphobia.”

Why are we talking about Miss Julianna and her weight? Because she’s the latest feckless attempt by the Democrat party to “fix” their problem of being abandoned by men. In true blue style, the Dems think that they can hide the fact that they hate men, especially white men, and that they can lure them back by using an enormous, obnoxious young feminist woman as the bait. If it weren’t so stupid it would be funny. 

Take a listen to a bit her schtick:

Can she really have toured college campuses and spoken to actual conservative young men if she believes they’re “mostly pro choice” and that a lot of them “support black lives matter”? The painfully liberal Texas Tribune seems to believe in Miss Julianna. They called her a “Democratic social media star” (right). They captured her deep and complex thoughts in an interview:

“It is one of the most heartbreaking and difficult lessons you have to learn when you’re working in this space, especially as a young person, is that people are inherently imperfect. Sometimes that imperfection means doing selfish or mean-spirited things with the intention of making positive change.”

Let’s see what people in the comparative real world of X/Twitter think:

Not going well for her so far. Let’s keep looking.

Back to the feeding board, darlin’. 

FBI Director Kash Patel took a blowtorch to James Comey for his Trump assassination Instagram post during a sit-down interview with Fox News host Bret Baier.

Patel warned that copycats are popping up across the country because of James Comey’s “8647” post.

As reported last week, Comey claimed he somehow just stumbled upon a curious formation of shells as he was walking down the beach with his wife.

“We were walking on the beach, we went to the beach to prepare for this week… and we were walking back towards the road and we saw in the sand someone had arranged shells with numbers.

And Patrice, my wife, said, ‘why would someone put an address in the sand?’ and I said, ‘I don’t know’ and we stood over and I said, ‘I think it’s some kind of political message.’”

As the backlash grew stronger, Comey then blamed his wife.

“She said you know, when I was a server – she did a lot of work in restaurants – meant to remove an item from the menu when you ran out of ingredients.

And I said, ‘well to me, as a kid it always meant to leave a place, to ditch a place.’

And she said well that very clever you should take a picture of that and I did and posted it on my Instagram and though nothing more of it until I heard through her that people were saying that it was a call for some sort of assassination which is crazy!”

Secret Service agents interviewed Comey, but nothing came of it.

“Do you know how many agents I have had to take off line chasing down child predators, fentanyl traffickers, and terrorists because across this country people are popping up on social media and think that a threat to the life of the president of the United States is a joke?!” Kash Patel said.

“And they can do it because he did it? That’s what I’m having to deal with every single day,” Patel said.

“And that’s what I’m having to pull my agents and analysts off because he thought it was funny to go out there and make a political statement.”

Watch:

Please visit The Daily Fetched for more stories like this.

We’re finding out all sorts of things about the Bidens that everyone suspected, but few would admit they were thinking about. But contrary to the assertions of CNN anchor Jake Tapper and his co-author Axios reporter Alex Thompson, we’re not “finding out” that Joe Biden was senile the whole time. 

Everyone knew it, including Tapper, which makes his new “tell-all” book about the “cover-up” especially ridiculous. Tapper and Thompson’s book certainly does disclose details about the Biden machine, and they’re interesting as far as they go. According to the book, the former President’s inner circle tried to keep the senile Biden out of situations where his mental incapacity would be obvious, even curtailing his contact with staff he would have been working with everyday under normal circumstances. 

But how are we to take seriously a couple of reporters who were neck deep in propping up the myth of a competent Biden who now want to make money from a book “exposing” what they themselves were doing? Tapper tried manfully to defend himself, with limited success, on former Fox anchor Megyn Kelly’s podcast recently. But she had him dead to rights, playing a clip from 2020 in which Tapper mocked and tried to humiliate Lara Trump for suggesting that Joe Biden had any age-related cognitive problems. 

It’s not just Joe Biden we’re finding out about. Again, as almost everyone suspected, Biden’s wife, Jill, had an inordinate amount of power for a first lady. Did you know she had her own “chief of staff?” Is that something presidential wives have always had? Either way, hers was a man named Alex Bernal, and the muckrakers at Project Veritas just caught recently deposed Democratic National Committee co-chair David Hogg admitting that people thought of Bernal as a holy terror. 

Check out this hidden camera footage from Project Veritas posted by LibsofTikTok. 

According to Hogg, the main power broker around the president was Alex Bernal, Jill Biden’s “chief of staff.” Hogg said he had “an enormous amount of power.”

Ex-Biden staffer Deterrian Jones was also captured on video, saying: “That was like an open secret. I would avoid him, he was scary. Anthony Bernal. He’s like a shadowy Wizard of Oz-type figure. The general public wouldn’t know how this man looked, but he wielded an enormous amount of power. I can’t stress to you enough how much power he had at the White House.”

Let’s see if Twitter/X users are surprised:

Nope. But some people are questioning the veracity of the hidden camera.