Democrats

Democrats

Multiple Bomb Threats Reported at NJ Polling Places, Guess Who Mandami Blamed?

Authorities in New Jersey confirmed multiple bomb threats disrupted voting at several polling locations on Tuesday before operations resumed later in the day.

Officials said the threats were determined to be non-credible, and polling places reopened after security sweeps.

Law enforcement agencies across the state responded to reports of threats at various voting centers early in the morning.

Voters were temporarily evacuated while local police and bomb squads inspected the buildings.

State officials emphasized that the incidents did not interfere with the integrity of the election process, and voting resumed shortly after each location was cleared.

Despite the rapid response and reassurances from officials, New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani drew political attention to the events, directly blaming President Donald Trump.

“It’s incredibly concerning,” Mamdani said.

“And I think this is an illustration of the attacks we’re seeing on our democracy. Sometimes they’re blatant and explicit in the manner of these bomb threats, and we have to understand this as part of the general approach the Trump administration has taken to try and intimidate voters with baseless allegations of voter fraud, as a means of trying to repress Americans across the country.”

Mamdani’s remarks immediately drew criticism across media platforms, with many questioning the evidence behind his claims.

On Fox News, host Kennedy addressed the comments during a panel discussion, calling them politically motivated and disconnected from the facts.

“This is emptiness,” Kennedy said.

“It means nothing. What he’s doing is deflecting because he doesn’t have an answer for this, because he is not prepared. If, God forbid, something like 9/11 happened again. Just think about that… do you remember what happened to the city? Do you remember what happened to this country? Do you remember who was the mayor and what was needed from that office? Could this person really provide that? I mean, it scares the hell out of me. I hope everyone has a plan with their kids if, God forbid, something happens.”

Law enforcement officials have not linked the New Jersey threats to any organized group or political motivation.

The FBI and state police are coordinating investigations with local departments to identify those responsible for the hoax reports.

The New Jersey Department of State confirmed that all polling sites affected by the threats were reopened and that voting continued safely throughout the day.

Election monitors said turnout remained steady despite the temporary interruptions.

Officials have urged the public to avoid spreading misinformation online as investigations continue.

The incidents, though disruptive, did not result in any injuries or damage.

Mamdani, a Democratic Socialist running for mayor of New York City, has previously drawn attention for controversial remarks about national security and law enforcement policy.

His comments linking President Trump to Tuesday’s threats prompted further scrutiny from political observers who questioned whether the mayoral hopeful was using the situation to advance a broader campaign narrative.

While investigators continue to track the origins of the false threats, state officials reiterated that New Jersey’s election security systems remain intact and that voters can safely participate in the process.

Democrats

Gavin Newsom’s Wife Attacks Trump, Instantly Reminded of Her Own Scandals

California First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom faced sharp backlash this week after using a campaign event to criticize President Donald Trump, prompting widespread reactions online highlighting controversies surrounding her and her husband, Governor Gavin Newsom.

The remarks came Monday during a press conference in Sacramento promoting Proposition 50, a Newsom-backed ballot measure that would temporarily suspend the state’s independent redistricting commission and give the legislature more control over congressional map drawing.

Supporters of the measure, including the governor, have argued it is needed to “modernize” California’s redistricting process.

Critics have said the proposal would allow Democrats to consolidate power by redrawing traditionally Republican districts in their favor.

During the event, Jennifer Siebel Newsom directed pointed comments at President Trump, calling him an unfit leader and vowing to raise her children with opposing values.

“And I will tell you right now, I will not raise my children to think Donald Trump is an acceptable American leader,” she said.

“Nor that he is the leader of what our great country should behave like.”

“I won’t raise them to think his terror enables his power and that his greed equals success,” she continued.

“He is the exact opposite of what real strength looks like.”

Her remarks quickly drew widespread reaction online, with critics citing both her husband’s political record and her own public controversies.

Some pointed out that the First Partner’s comments appeared to overlook several well-documented scandals involving the governor.

One widely shared post read, “He’s not an acceptable American leader. Didn’t Gavin Newsom cheat on his ex-wife with his best friend’s wife? He’s not what strength really looks like. Like Harvey Weinstein, who Jennifer gave fellatio to? He doesn’t tell the truth. Like Gavin, who said he’d end homelessness in California, but it’s only gotten exponentially worse under him?”

Conservative commentator Jennifer Van Laar, editor of RedState, also weighed in, referencing Siebel Newsom’s previous connections to the Hollywood entertainment industry.

“JSN tried to silence Rose McGowan re: Harvey Weinstein, because JSN’s brother-in-law is one of the Schillers in Boies Schiller law firm,” Van Laar wrote. “JSN slandered Ruby Rippey-Tourk, Gavin’s former secretary, when Gavin had sex with Ruby after Ruby ‘showed up passed out outside his door.’ Sounds to me like JSN knows all about con artists, predators, and malignant narcissists, and defends them to her children.”

Media analyst Joe Concha of Fox News reminded followers of the governor’s actions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

He noted that both Gavin and Jennifer Newsom attended a private dinner at the French Laundry restaurant in Napa Valley while the governor’s stay-at-home order was in effect.

“Jennifer Newsom also attended the French Laundry dinner,” Concha wrote.

“The Newsoms also sent their kids to private school while the governor shut down public ones. True story.”

The criticism comes as Governor Newsom continues to face scrutiny over California’s economic and housing crises.

The state’s homelessness rate has continued to climb despite repeated pledges from the governor to reduce it, and his administration has faced bipartisan criticism over spending priorities and public accountability.

Democrats

Dem Senator Defends VA AG Candidate After Texts Surface About Killing Opponent’s Kids

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) defended Virginia Democratic attorney general candidate Jay Jones during an interview on NBC’s Meet the Press Sunday, saying Jones should not withdraw from the race despite outrage over text messages in which he made violent comments about police officers and a fellow lawmaker.

The controversy centers on text messages from 2022, revealed earlier this month, that Jones sent while serving in the Virginia House of Delegates.

In the messages, Jones expressed hope that then-Speaker of the Virginia House Todd Gilbert (R) would die and that Gilbert’s children would be shot and killed, saying such a tragedy might change his stance on gun control.

The messages also included comments suggesting that he wanted to see more police officers die amid legislative debate over qualified immunity in Richmond.

The texts resurfaced during Jones’s campaign against incumbent Republican Attorney General Jason Miyares, who is seeking reelection.

The race remains close as both candidates campaign across Virginia ahead of the November election.

During the interview, host Kristen Welker asked Kaine whether he believed Jones should step aside given the nature of the messages.

Kaine replied that he had known Jones for more than two decades and believed the messages were out of character.

“I’ve known Jay for 25 years,” Kaine said.

“He apologized for those remarks, and I believe him when he says they were out of character.”

Kaine, who served as Virginia’s governor from 2006 to 2010, went on to say that Jones should remain in the race, arguing that voters would ultimately decide whether the comments disqualify him.

When pressed by Welker about whether his answer would be the same if Jones were a Republican, Kaine responded, “Yes.”

The remarks drew sharp criticism from political observers and opponents who accused Kaine of downplaying violent rhetoric.

Jones’s campaign issued a statement reiterating his apology, saying the messages were “inexcusable” and that he had “grown and learned” from the incident.

Miyares’s campaign did not immediately respond to Kaine’s comments but previously condemned the messages as “deeply disturbing” and “unacceptable for any candidate seeking to be Virginia’s top law enforcement officer.”

The controversy follows a heated debate between Miyares and Jones last week, during which both candidates addressed public safety, police reform, and prosecutorial discretion.

According to campaign reports, Jones raised more than $500,000 in the 24 hours following the debate, signaling continued support from Democratic donors despite the scandal.

Political analysts say the race could have significant implications for Virginia’s approach to law enforcement policy.

Miyares, elected in 2021, has focused on combating violent crime, human trafficking, and fentanyl distribution.

Jones, a former state legislator and attorney from Norfolk, has emphasized criminal justice reform and expanded oversight of police departments.

The resurfaced text messages, first obtained by The National Review, have become a major issue in the campaign’s closing weeks. Gilbert, the subject of Jones’s remarks, has not commented publicly.

Jones remains on the ballot as Democratic leaders in Virginia continue to stand by him, while Republicans have used the controversy to question his fitness to serve as the state’s attorney general.

The election will be held on November 5.

Democrats

Kamala Harris Calls Biden’s Snub of Elon Musk a ‘Big Mistake’ at 2021 EV Event

Former Vice President Kamala Harris has publicly criticized Joe Biden’s decision to exclude Elon Musk from a 2021 White House event on electric vehicles, calling the move a “big mistake.”

Harris made the comments Tuesday during Fortune’s Most Powerful Women Summit in Washington, D.C., where she discussed her new memoir 107 Days and reflected on policy missteps from the administration she once served, as reported by The New York Post.

Vice-President Kamala Harris and President Joe Biden attend 23rd anniversary commemoration at 9-11 memorial in New York on September 11, 2024

“I write in the book that I thought it was a big mistake to not invite Elon Musk when we did a big EV event,” Harris said in her interview with Fortune Editor-in-Chief Alyson Shontell. “I mean, here he is, the major American manufacturer of extraordinary innovation in this space.”

In August 2021, Biden hosted executives from General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler parent company Stellantis to promote a goal of making half of all new vehicles sold by 2030 zero-emission.

Tesla — the nation’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer — was not invited. Then–White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki told reporters at the time that the event featured “the three largest employers of the United Auto Workers,” a pointed reference to Tesla’s non-unionized workforce.

When pressed on whether the omission was intentional, Psaki replied, “I’ll let you draw your own conclusion.”

Musk, whose company produced more electric vehicles than all three automakers combined, reacted on X, writing, “Yeah, seems odd that Tesla wasn’t invited.” Weeks later, he called the Biden administration “not the friendliest” and said it appeared “controlled by unions.”

Frederic Legrand – COMEO – Shutterstock.com

Harris told the Fortune audience that political loyalty should never override acknowledgment of innovation. “I thought that was a mistake, and I don’t know Elon Musk, but I have to assume that that was something that hit him hard and had an impact on his perspective,” she said.

Her comments echo a passage in 107 Days, where she writes that the administration’s decision alienated Musk, who later became one of President Donald Trump’s most prominent financial backers.

During the 2024 election cycle, Musk contributed nearly $300 million to Republican-aligned political groups, including America PAC, which supported President Trump’s reelection effort.

According to The Wall Street Journal, Tesla officials sought multiple meetings with the White House after the 2021 inauguration but were repeatedly rebuffed amid union pressure.

After learning Tesla would be excluded from the event, administration officials reportedly called the company to apologize.

A month later, Biden credited GM’s CEO Mary Barra with having “electrified the entire automobile industry,” a remark that angered Musk, whose company had delivered over 115,000 electric vehicles in the United States that same quarter, compared with GM’s 26,000.

White House aides later attempted to repair the relationship by arranging calls between Musk and senior officials, though tensions remained.

At the Fortune event, Harris also criticized early Biden administration priorities, saying the White House focused too heavily on infrastructure and semiconductor legislation rather than addressing immediate economic pressures.

“When we made the decision as an administration to put the infrastructure bill and the CHIPS Act first, I actually think that was a mistake,” she said. “Very important work, no question, but we did that before putting the immediate needs ahead of anything else.”

Her remarks come as Biden, now 82, undergoes radiation and hormone therapy for Stage 4 prostate cancer. He was seen Saturday leaving evening Mass in Wilmington, Delaware, marking his first public appearance since treatment began.

Aides said his condition is “high-grade” but hormone-sensitive.

The Post has sought comment from both Biden and Musk regarding Harris’s statements.

Democrats

Dems’ J6 Committee Caught Collecting 30 Million Phone Records Targeting Trump Allies

Congressional investigators obtained an estimated 30 million lines of telephone metadata during the Democrat-led January 6 Select Committee’s probe into the 2021 Capitol riot, according to documents and testimony recently disclosed to federal investigators.

The large-scale data collection effort—revealed in an FBI memo from December 2023—has prompted new scrutiny over Congress’s ability to collect private communications records without judicial oversight.

Former Illinois Congressman Adam Kinzinger, one of two Republicans appointed by Democrats to serve on the committee, told the FBI that the data had been collected by former Rep. Denver Riggleman, a one-time Republican and senior technical adviser to the panel.

The memo, reviewed by Just the News, indicates that Kinzinger offered the full cache to the FBI without a warrant shortly before the 2024 presidential election.

“Kinzinger noted that he did not conduct the analysis himself but that Riggleman had identified certain telephone connections between numbers identified as being associated with the White House and certain individuals,” FBI agents wrote in their summary of the conversation.

The memo also stated that Riggleman “had a contact and was able to obtain toll information including for White House root or switchboard numbers via congressional subpoena.”

The offer to the FBI was made after the Jan. 6 committee had formally disbanded and months after Kinzinger had left Congress.

The scale of the data collection—described as roughly 30 million lines—was significantly larger than the 18 million lines previously disclosed by investigators in public statements and publications.

In a statement posted to his Substack on Wednesday, Kinzinger confirmed that he discussed the records with FBI agents in December 2023 but insisted that the data had been lawfully obtained in 2021 through congressional subpoenas.

“Congress used lawful subpoenas to obtain phone metadata in 2021. It was routine. It was reported. It was discussed openly,” Kinzinger wrote.

“In 2023, I had a brief discussion with members of the FBI reminding them of this data if they needed it in their investigation. Regardless, they didn’t seem interested and that was that.”

Although the committee’s subpoenas were public, they did not disclose the total amount of data collected or the decision to share the material with the FBI.

It remains unclear whether the bureau accepted or reviewed the information offered by Kinzinger.

The new revelations follow earlier reports that Special Counsel Jack Smith and the FBI obtained private phone records from multiple Republican lawmakers during investigations tied to the January 6 events.

According to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, those records included call metadata for eight Republican senators and one House member, collected between January 4 and January 7, 2021.

Grassley’s office also revealed that the FBI’s “Arctic Frost” investigation targeted dozens of GOP officials and organizations, including campaign groups linked to President Donald Trump.

Grassley said the FBI data collection included the phone records of Sens. Ron Johnson, Lindsey Graham, Josh Hawley, Tommy Tuberville, and others.

Grassley Et Al to Verizon – Toll Records by Red Voice News

“This document shows the Biden FBI spied on eight of my Republican Senate colleagues during its Arctic Frost investigation,” Grassley said in a statement.

“BIDEN FBI WEAPONIZATION = WORSE THAN WATERGATE.”

Kash Patel, the current FBI Director, confirmed that the memo documenting Kinzinger’s offer to the bureau was uncovered as part of an internal review.

Patel described the Jan. 6 committee’s massive collection as “baseless monitoring of members of Congress.”

He added that the bureau has since “terminated employees, abolished the weaponized CR-15 squad, and initiated an ongoing investigation with more accountability measures ahead.”

Former Senate Judiciary Committee lawyer Mike Davis, who now leads the Article 3 Project, said the scale of the congressional data collection could trigger a legal challenge over congressional immunity under the Constitution’s Speech and Debate Clause.

“This episode will test the limits of congressional immunity and whether it affords protection to activity that constitutes a criminal conspiracy to violate Americans’ civil rights,” Davis said.

Mike Howell, president of the Oversight Project, described the January 6 Committee’s actions as “an absolute violation of civil rights that far exceeded anything it ever purported to be investigating.”

Riggleman, who left Congress in 2021, has previously described the committee’s data analysis in his 2022 book The Breach: The Untold Story of the Investigation into January 6th.

In the book, he wrote that his team “analyzed phone numbers that belonged to those in the Trump family, rallygoers, rally planners, influencers like Flynn, Stone, and Bannon; and many others,” and used subpoenaed call records to identify White House-linked numbers and other communications.

After leaving the committee, Riggleman became a data consultant for Hunter Biden’s legal team in 2023, helping analyze materials related to the Biden laptop controversy.

The newly surfaced FBI memo documenting Kinzinger’s contact adds to concerns about the extent of congressional surveillance powers and their use in politically charged investigations.

Grassley has requested information from telecommunications companies and multiple federal agencies to determine the full scope of data shared with federal investigators during the January 6 probe.

Democrats

Democrats’ Base Now More Socialist Than Capitalist After 2024 Defeat Poll Reveals

A new Gallup poll released in August shows that a growing share of Democrats now view socialism more favorably than capitalism, underscoring the party’s shift toward left-wing economic policies in the aftermath of its 2024 electoral defeat.

According to the survey, only 42 percent of Democrats said they had a positive view of capitalism, while 66 percent expressed a favorable opinion of socialism.

By contrast, 74 percent of Republicans reported a favorable view of capitalism, with only 14 percent saying they viewed socialism positively. The poll was conducted between August 1 and August 20 among 1,094 U.S. adults.

Overall, 54 percent of Americans said they had a positive view of capitalism, down from 60 percent in 2021 and marking the lowest level since Gallup began tracking the measure in 2010.

Favorable views of socialism rose slightly in the same period, from 36 percent to 39 percent.

Gallup noted that Democrats have viewed socialism more positively than capitalism since 2016, but the gap between the two has widened in recent years.

The findings suggest that Democratic voters are increasingly receptive to the types of policy proposals long advanced by prominent figures on the party’s progressive wing.

The shift in attitudes is evident in New York City, where Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani won the Democratic primary for mayor earlier this year.

Mamdani has proposed raising the minimum wage to $30 an hour, creating taxpayer-funded government-run grocery stores, and imposing higher taxes on what he has described as “richer and whiter” neighborhoods.

Mamdani has secured endorsements from leading progressives, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and Sen. Bernie Sanders.

However, some of the party’s top leaders, such as House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, have not openly embraced his candidacy.

If elected in November, Mamdani would become the first self-described Democratic Socialist to serve as mayor of New York City.

His platform has drawn both strong support from progressives and sharp criticism from Republicans, who say his rise illustrates the Democratic Party’s drift toward socialism.

House Speaker Mike Johnson pointed to Mamdani’s win as a potential advantage for Republicans heading into the 2026 midterm elections.

“Democrats, who have learned nothing from their historic defeat in 2024, are rallying around a radical, Antisemitic, abolish-ICE [U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement], defund-the-police, big-government Marxist,” Johnson told the Daily Caller News Foundation in July following Mamdani’s primary victory.

“Comrade Mamdani’s extreme views are bad news for New York City, but great news for House Republicans.”

The Gallup findings and Mamdani’s candidacy highlight the challenges Democrats face as they attempt to redefine their message and rebuild their base after significant losses.

With the party’s grassroots increasingly supportive of socialist policies and Republican leaders eager to draw attention to that shift, the debate over the future direction of the Democratic Party is likely to remain a central issue heading into the 2026 elections.

Democrats

Democrats Sink to Near Zero in New Gallup Poll, They’re Just Not Satisfied

A new Gallup survey released this week highlights a record level of partisan division over the direction of the United States, with satisfaction among Republicans at its highest point in years while satisfaction among Democrats has dropped to near zero.

According to Gallup, 76 percent of Republicans say they are satisfied with the way things are going in the country.

By contrast, just 0.4 percent of Democrats expressed satisfaction — a figure that rounds down to zero in Gallup’s reporting.

The disparity between the two parties stands at 76 percentage points, the largest gap ever recorded by the polling organization on this measure.

Gallup noted that while the figure represents a new high in partisan division, it is consistent with a trend observed throughout 2025.

Earlier this year, the gap measured 75 points in May and 74 points in both March and July.

“Partisanship is also at a peak on this metric, with 76% of Republicans saying they are satisfied with the direction of the country versus less than 1% of Democrats. The resulting 76-point gap is the highest Gallup has recorded on this measure, although not substantially different from a 75-point gap in May and 74 points in March and July. Before this year, the parties had differed by more than 70 points on satisfaction only once, in October 2004 before that year’s presidential election,” Gallup reported.

The numbers reflect the extent to which political attitudes toward the country’s trajectory are shaped by President Donald Trump’s policies in his second term.

While Republicans overwhelmingly approve of the administration’s direction, Democrats have expressed sharp disapproval.

The Trump administration has moved forward on several major policy initiatives since the start of the second term.

Among them are expanded border enforcement measures that federal officials say have significantly reduced illegal border crossings, an effort that has included mass deportations and strengthened coordination with state governments.

Other actions have included cuts to federal spending on programs identified by the administration as duplicative or nonessential.

Billions of dollars have been reallocated through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which was created to identify areas of waste and redirect funds.

The administration has also moved to roll back diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs across federal agencies, a step that officials say will streamline operations and reduce costs.

In addition, President Trump has issued pardons to individuals convicted in connection with the events of January 6, 2021, describing the move as part of an effort to promote fairness in sentencing and to close a contentious chapter in national politics.

These actions have been broadly welcomed among Republican voters, contributing to the high levels of satisfaction reflected in Gallup’s findings.

By contrast, Democrats have consistently expressed opposition to the administration’s policy direction, accounting for the record-low satisfaction levels reported in the survey.

The Gallup poll underscores the sharp divisions that continue to define American politics.

While partisan gaps in national satisfaction have existed in past administrations, the current difference between Republicans and Democrats is the largest recorded since Gallup began measuring the question.

With the partisan divide at record levels, Gallup’s data suggests that attitudes about the country’s direction remain deeply polarized along party lines, with President Trump’s agenda continuing to shape the political landscape in his second term.

Democrats

Disgraced Hunter Biden Drops String of F-Bombs, Lectures Americans on Immigration

You might think that having been caught on tape doing drugs with prostitutes in luxury hotels and being an obvious low-life hustler and addict would disqualify a person from lecturing fellow Americans about what bad behavior they should tolerate. But then you would not be Hunter Biden. 

The disgraced son of former President Joe Biden has no shame at all about appearing in public, on camera, and declaiming about what ails the United States. After the Democrats and the media successfully suppressed the biggest story of the presidential election in 2020, Hunter appeared to be in the clear. But then he got slapped with tax evasion and drug charges before Daddy Dearest abused his power to give his son a full pardon. 

If you’d gotten away scot-free with all of that, you’d probably be pretty cocky, too. Hunter Biden appears to be in the beginning stages of an image-rehabilitation tour, and it will very likely work with the half of American citizens who still believe the Biden family are just decent, hard-working folks. 

Ready to help, the show “Channel 5 with Andrew Callaghan” had the former president’s son sit down to lecture America on how mean we are to illegal immigrants. The word Hunter used most frequently seems to be “f*ck.” Oddly, Hunter claims that “Democrats” are the ones who want to listen to Americans’ concerns about illegal immigration. No, your correspondent can’t explain that, but he said it. 

Hunter’s response to these allegedly-concerned-about-illegal-immigration-Democrats was, “F*ck you.” See, those border jumpers have dreams and aspirations and grit. 

“How do you think your hotel room gets cleaned? How do you think you go food on your f*cking table? Who do  you think washes your dishes? Who do you think does your f*cking garden? Who do you think is here by the [insert dramatic hand gestures] sheer f*cking just grit and will that they figured out a way to get here because they thought they could give theirselves [sic] and their family a better chance? And he’s somehow convinced all of us [apparently Hunter is referring to President Trump] that these people are the f*cking criminals?”

Yep. The drug addict, liar, and alleged influence peddler who is only free because his daddy issued him a presidential pardon did indeed have the nerve to say all that. 

Let’s see what the American public had to say in response. 

In America today, no matter how low and ugly someone’s character, you’d better not count them out. Wanna place bets on whether Hunter runs for office and wins?

Democrats

Hunter Biden Slammed for Threatening to Invade El Salvador to Return Deported Illegal Immigrants

Salvadorian President Nayib Bukele and the White House both trolled Hunter Biden after he made unhinged comments about illegal immigrants that have been deported to the Central American country. 

Biden’s son promised to invade El Salvador if he became president and the country refused to return those illegals deported under the Trump administration. Hunter made the cringeworthy remarks during a conversation with Channel 5 host Andrew Callaghan.

“I’ll tell you what, if I became president in two years from now, or four years from now, or three years from now, I would pick up the phone and call the f‑‑‑ing president in El Salvador and say, ‘You either f‑‑‑ing send them back or I’m gonna f‑‑‑ing invade.’ It’s a f‑‑‑ing crime what they’re doing. He’s a f‑‑‑ing dictator thug,” Hunter said.

He described both President Trump and Bukele as “thugs.” Salvadorian President Bukele issued a hilarious response to Hunter’s threat to invade his country:

“Is Hunter Biden sniffing powdered milk?” Bukele asked.

Hunter has admitted to using a controlled substance, including when obtaining a firearm, a fact that he failed to disclose. That admission resulted in two guilty convictions – one for lying on a federal form and the second for owning a gun while being addicted to illicit drugs.

Interestingly, many of the illegal immigrants that Hunter wishes to return to the U.S. have already been repatriated to their home countries across several continents. 

Just recently, El Salvador sent numerous Venezuelan illegal immigrants deported from America back to their home country in order to secure the release of all American hostages held in that country. It seems that Hunter would need to invade multiple nations to return all illegals deported from the U.S.

Even the most rabid pro-illegal radical Democrats in Congress would hesitate to approve such invasions.

The White House was much more direct and scathing when asked to comment on Hunter’s threat to invade El Salvador.

“Luckily for the American people, a house cat has a better chance of being President than Hunter,” White House spokesperson Anna Kelly told The Hill in an email.

During the same interview, Hunter slammed top liberals for undermining or failing to protect his father. 

He blasted liberal actor George Clooney, accusing him of sabotaging his father’s campaign — with the blessing of Barack Obama.

He also accused Biden’s team of allegedly giving him Ambien on the campaign trail ahead of the disastrous debate that led to his withdrawal from the race.

“They give him Ambien to be able to sleep,” he said.

“He gets up on the stage. And he looks like he’s a deer in the headlights. And it feeds into every f—ing story that anybody wants to tell,” he added.

Democrats

NYC Mayoral Candidate Zohran Mamdani’s Comments on Domestic Violence Spark Outrage from Abuse Survivors

Communist New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani continues to receive backlash online, this time from victims of domestic violence. Recently, Mamdani provoked the ire of domestic violence victims by opposing police responding to domestic violence incidents.

According to the CDC, one in four women and one in ten men experience some form of domestic violence in their lifetime, ranging from stalking, mental abuse, to physical abuse, and life-threatening injuries involving knives and firearms. However, the Mamdani does not believe that armed police should respond to these situations.

“Police do not create safety… there are so many responsibilities we’ve given to police that, frankly, should have nothing to do with their departments… if somebody is jaywalking, if somebody is surviving, going through domestic violence—there are so many different, different situations that would be far better handled by people trained to deal with those specific situations, as opposed to an individual with a gun,” he said, according to the Washington Free Beacon.

It is highly unlikely, however, that marriage counselors are the best choice for first-time responders when a spouse is being held at gunpoint. According to Victims Rights Reform Council founder, Michelle Esquenazi, domestic violence is often a life and death situation. It remains unclear how mental health counselors and social workers would be able to respond to a spouse holding their partner captive at gunpoint or knifepoint – as Mamdani would want.

“There’s a lot of humans who are victims in the city of New York, and they need protection because sometimes it’s a matter of life and death,” Esquenazi told Fox News Digital. “They’re hiding in the bathroom with their children, and they need someone to come immediately.” 

Esquenazi claims that Mamdani’s statements affect her personally, as the New York Police Department (NYPD) saved her life when her ex-husband attacked her while she was pregnant in 1993.

“I called 911, and they came running. They made sure that me and my children, and I was pregnant at the time, were safe. One of the officers took us to a back bedroom and made sure that we were calmed down and made sure that we had what we needed. They separated him from the situation immediately and essentially saved our lives,” she said.

Meanwhile, Mamdani’s comments align anti-police sentiments stoked by the George Floyd riots, resulting in calls for the defunding of entire law enforcement departments. Many deep blue cities have even changed their emergency response protocols for domestic violence, with some ending armed police response altogether. 

Mamdani has repeatedly called for the defunding of the police, including proposals to delegate certain law enforcement responsibilities to the “Department of Community Safety.” However, in classic liberal subterfuge, Mr. Mamdani later denied pushing for the defunding of police, and even promised to work with them.


Scroll to Top