Democrats

Democrats

Arizona Governor Hobbs Vetoes Bill Blocking Chinese Land Purchases Near Military Bases

Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs is facing criticism after vetoing legislation that would have blocked the Chinese government and its affiliates from acquiring land near key military and infrastructure sites in the state.

The vetoed measure, Senate Bill 1109, passed the legislature but was rejected by Hobbs on Tuesday, prompting backlash from Republican lawmakers and national security advocates.

State Senate Majority Leader Janae Shamp condemned the veto, calling it a “politically motivated” move that puts Arizonans at risk.

“This is utterly insane,” Shamp said.

“Governor Hobbs is an obstructionist against safeguarding our citizens from threats.”

SB 1109 sought to prohibit the People’s Republic of China from acquiring a 30% or greater ownership stake in any Arizona property.

The legislation was introduced in response to growing concerns over Chinese interests purchasing land near sensitive U.S. military installations, including Luke Air Force Base, Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, and facilities owned by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).

Governor Hobbs defended her decision by arguing that the bill would not have accomplished its intended security goals.

“This bill is ineffective at counter-espionage and does not directly protect our military assets,” Hobbs stated in her veto letter.

She also criticized the legislation for lacking “clear implementation criteria,” which she said could result in “arbitrary enforcement.”

Michael Lucci, founder and CEO of State Armor Action, a policy group focused on state-level security legislation, strongly disagreed with Hobbs’ assessment.

“Governor Hobbs’s veto of SB 1109 hangs an ‘Open for the CCP’ sign on Arizona’s front door,” Lucci said.

“Allowing Communist China to buy up land near our critical assets is a national security risk, plain and simple, and Governor Hobbs is substantively and completely wrong.”

Lucci also pointed to global examples of strategic vulnerability, referencing Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian military infrastructure.

“Proximity produces peril in asymmetric warfare,” he said, reinforcing the concern that even limited foreign land ownership near critical infrastructure could pose significant risk.

The bill underwent a bipartisan amendment process prior to its passage in the legislature.

Originally, it broadly prohibited entities and individuals deemed national security risks from purchasing land in Arizona.

Lawmakers later narrowed the language to target Chinese government-linked companies and their subsidiaries, in an effort to avoid concerns of discrimination.

Despite Hobbs’ objections, the Arizona legislature retains the ability to override the veto.

It is currently unclear whether Republican lawmakers will attempt such a move or if they have sufficient support to do so.

Arizona is not alone in confronting the issue of foreign land purchases near strategic U.S. sites. According to the nonprofit Committee of 100, which monitors China-related policies, at least 27 states are considering a total of 84 bills this year to limit foreign ownership of land.

So far, 22 states have passed similar laws, 17 of which were enacted in 2024.

At the federal level, Congress is also reviewing legislation designed to restrict foreign entities, particularly those affiliated with the Chinese government, from owning land near military or critical infrastructure.

As of March, seven separate bills on the matter were being considered in both chambers.

The veto of SB 1109 has now placed Arizona at the center of the national debate on how to counter foreign influence through land acquisitions.

Lawmakers and national security advocates continue to call for stricter measures to limit such purchases, arguing that real estate ownership near sensitive sites could be exploited for espionage or sabotage.

Please visit Drew Berquist.com for more articles like this.

Democrats

Jasmine Crockett Vows Trump Impeachment Inquiry if Named Oversight Chair

Jasmine Crockett Vows Trump Impeachment Inquiry if Named Oversight Chair

Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) has vowed to pursue an impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump if she becomes chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

This month, Democrats will elect their new ranking member following the recent death of Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA), who died of esophageal cancer.

Crockett entered the race to replace Connolly as the party’s top representative on the committee on Tuesday.

In a letter to Democrats obtained by Politico, Crockett said:

“Our country is in an existential crisis driven by an out-of-control Executive with a flagrant disregard for our Constitution, our way of governance, and our very way of life as citizens of a democratic republic.

We must pull back the curtain on the unmitigated chaos under Trump 2.0 and translate our findings to the American people in a way they can digest.”

Crockett emphasized during an interview with WFAA that she would wield her power as Oversight chair if the Democrats win back the majority in the House:

“Once we get to the majority, which I’m hoping and praying we get to, next cycle, that allows me to start to open up and do the things that would look like an impeachment,” the lawmaker said.

“Now, whether or not we would put it to a vote, you know, he’s been impeached twice, couldn’t get convicted.

There’s a lot of things to consider about whether or not to go forward.”

On going after Trump, Crockett said:

“I would absolutely at least do an inquiry.

Absolutely. I think that there’s more than enough to inquire about.”

Citing the Qatari government’s gifting of a luxury Boeing 747 jet to Trump, Crockett alleged “crypto nonsense” and “pardons for play,” adding there are numerous issues she wants to “dig into.”

The congresswoman becomes the fourth Democrat to enter the race to become the committee’s next ranking member, following Reps. Stephen Lynch (D-MA), Robert Garcia (D-CA), and Kweisi Mfume (D-MD).

Crockett added:

“If we didn’t have such a lawless administration, then I wouldn’t be running.”

Please visit The Daily Fetched for more stories like this.

Democrats, Media

MSNBC Under Fire for Referring to Egyptian Firebomber a “White Male”

MSNBC Under Fire for Referring to Egyptian Firebomber a ‘White Male’

An Egyptian national accused of carrying out a vicious attack on a Jewish gathering in Boulder, Colorado, has been called a ‘white male’ by MSNBC.

45-year-old Mohamad Soliman was taken into custody following reports of multiple individuals being injured by Molotov cocktails and other incendiary devices.

Soliman was confirmed to be in the United States illegally after overstaying a visa granted in 2022.

Several people, including children, were hospitalized following the violent attack.

The FBI confirmed that the attack is being investigated as a case of ideologically motivated violence.

According to federal records, Soliman entered the United States in 2022 during the Biden-Harris administration.

While he arrived on a tourist visa, Soliman failed to leave the country when his authorized stay expired. He even obtained a work permit in March 2023 through a federal process.

Soliman allegedly launched the attack on the group “Run for Their Lives,” which hosts public demonstrations in support of Israeli hostages held by Hamas.

Soliman was transported to a nearby medical facility for minor injuries before being booked into the Boulder County Jail.

He now remains in custody as both local and federal officials review possible charges, including attempted murder and use of explosive devices.

Just a week before the incident, a young couple was killed outside the Jewish Museum in Washington, D.C., in a separate suspected ideologically motivated attack.

Meanwhile, media outlets like MSNBC reported that the suspect was a “white male” despite police identifying Soliman as a Muslim man from Egypt.

Watch:

The reporting has prompted questions about the standards used for suspect descriptions in breaking news coverage.

While Soliman has not yet been formally charged in federal court, law enforcement officials confirmed that a joint federal and state investigation is underway.

Please visit The Daily Fetched for more articles like this.

Democrats

Dems Lure Young Men Back With Hambeast Influencer

“I love young men. I love frat guys,” says Olivia Julianna on a podcast discussing how the Democrat party can win back the young male vote. 

You could be forgiven for suspecting she meant to add, “On toasted rye with swiss and extra mayonnaise.”

Miss Julianna, you see, is a very ample woman. That’s a polite way of saying she’s enormously fat.  Oh, yes, it’s true. We’re not supposed to make fun of people for being ugly, or fat, or for dressing up like an alien lunatic. But those rules were written in a time (it’s within living memory) that we weren’t also told by everyone on the left that being an enormous hambeast was not only healthful but beautiful, that ugly people were gorgeous, and that green hair was the height of feminine seduction. We’re told all those things now by a left-leaning America that uses transvestites to sell lingerie to women and who says not wanting to die early from excess weight is “fatphobia.”

Why are we talking about Miss Julianna and her weight? Because she’s the latest feckless attempt by the Democrat party to “fix” their problem of being abandoned by men. In true blue style, the Dems think that they can hide the fact that they hate men, especially white men, and that they can lure them back by using an enormous, obnoxious young feminist woman as the bait. If it weren’t so stupid it would be funny. 

Take a listen to a bit her schtick:

Can she really have toured college campuses and spoken to actual conservative young men if she believes they’re “mostly pro choice” and that a lot of them “support black lives matter”? The painfully liberal Texas Tribune seems to believe in Miss Julianna. They called her a “Democratic social media star” (right). They captured her deep and complex thoughts in an interview:

“It is one of the most heartbreaking and difficult lessons you have to learn when you’re working in this space, especially as a young person, is that people are inherently imperfect. Sometimes that imperfection means doing selfish or mean-spirited things with the intention of making positive change.”

Let’s see what people in the comparative real world of X/Twitter think:

Not going well for her so far. Let’s keep looking.

Back to the feeding board, darlin’. 

Democrats

FBI Director Kash Patel Unleashes on Comey: “Agents Pulled Off Child Predator Cases Over His 8647 Post”

FBI Director Kash Patel Unleashes on Comey: “Agents Pulled Off Child Predator Cases Over His 8647 Post"

FBI Director Kash Patel took a blowtorch to James Comey for his Trump assassination Instagram post during a sit-down interview with Fox News host Bret Baier.

Patel warned that copycats are popping up across the country because of James Comey’s “8647” post.

As reported last week, Comey claimed he somehow just stumbled upon a curious formation of shells as he was walking down the beach with his wife.

“We were walking on the beach, we went to the beach to prepare for this week… and we were walking back towards the road and we saw in the sand someone had arranged shells with numbers.

And Patrice, my wife, said, ‘why would someone put an address in the sand?’ and I said, ‘I don’t know’ and we stood over and I said, ‘I think it’s some kind of political message.’”

As the backlash grew stronger, Comey then blamed his wife.

“She said you know, when I was a server – she did a lot of work in restaurants – meant to remove an item from the menu when you ran out of ingredients.

And I said, ‘well to me, as a kid it always meant to leave a place, to ditch a place.’

And she said well that very clever you should take a picture of that and I did and posted it on my Instagram and though nothing more of it until I heard through her that people were saying that it was a call for some sort of assassination which is crazy!”

Secret Service agents interviewed Comey, but nothing came of it.

“Do you know how many agents I have had to take off line chasing down child predators, fentanyl traffickers, and terrorists because across this country people are popping up on social media and think that a threat to the life of the president of the United States is a joke?!” Kash Patel said.

“And they can do it because he did it? That’s what I’m having to deal with every single day,” Patel said.

“And that’s what I’m having to pull my agents and analysts off because he thought it was funny to go out there and make a political statement.”

Watch:

Please visit The Daily Fetched for more stories like this.

Democrats

David Hogg on Hidden Camera Slams Jill Biden’s “Chief of Staff”

We’re finding out all sorts of things about the Bidens that everyone suspected, but few would admit they were thinking about. But contrary to the assertions of CNN anchor Jake Tapper and his co-author Axios reporter Alex Thompson, we’re not “finding out” that Joe Biden was senile the whole time. 

Everyone knew it, including Tapper, which makes his new “tell-all” book about the “cover-up” especially ridiculous. Tapper and Thompson’s book certainly does disclose details about the Biden machine, and they’re interesting as far as they go. According to the book, the former President’s inner circle tried to keep the senile Biden out of situations where his mental incapacity would be obvious, even curtailing his contact with staff he would have been working with everyday under normal circumstances. 

But how are we to take seriously a couple of reporters who were neck deep in propping up the myth of a competent Biden who now want to make money from a book “exposing” what they themselves were doing? Tapper tried manfully to defend himself, with limited success, on former Fox anchor Megyn Kelly’s podcast recently. But she had him dead to rights, playing a clip from 2020 in which Tapper mocked and tried to humiliate Lara Trump for suggesting that Joe Biden had any age-related cognitive problems. 

It’s not just Joe Biden we’re finding out about. Again, as almost everyone suspected, Biden’s wife, Jill, had an inordinate amount of power for a first lady. Did you know she had her own “chief of staff?” Is that something presidential wives have always had? Either way, hers was a man named Alex Bernal, and the muckrakers at Project Veritas just caught recently deposed Democratic National Committee co-chair David Hogg admitting that people thought of Bernal as a holy terror. 

Check out this hidden camera footage from Project Veritas posted by LibsofTikTok. 

According to Hogg, the main power broker around the president was Alex Bernal, Jill Biden’s “chief of staff.” Hogg said he had “an enormous amount of power.”

Ex-Biden staffer Deterrian Jones was also captured on video, saying: “That was like an open secret. I would avoid him, he was scary. Anthony Bernal. He’s like a shadowy Wizard of Oz-type figure. The general public wouldn’t know how this man looked, but he wielded an enormous amount of power. I can’t stress to you enough how much power he had at the White House.”

Let’s see if Twitter/X users are surprised:

Nope. But some people are questioning the veracity of the hidden camera. 

Democrats

Kamala Harris Butchers Definition of Humility, Gets Lost in Her Own Speech Again

Kamala Harris delivered an extended and at times confusing answer on the concept of “humility” during a Sunday interview at the Australian Real Estate Conference (AREC), where she appeared as a guest speaker.

The session was hosted by real estate executive John McGrath, who described Harris as “humble” and asked what advice she might offer to professionals in his industry about staying grounded.

Image Credit: Phil Mistry – Shutterstock.com

Harris responded with a lengthy and abstract reflection on the idea of humility, during which she clarified, “I do not aspire to be humble” and “would not recommend it.”

“I think that one must be humble. But to aspire to be humble would be quite inauthentic … If one understands that, just, I mean, there’s so much that is magnificent and awe-inspiring about this world and its people,” Harris said.

“And when you take the moment to just listen to an individual’s story, whether it’s someone you’re sitting next to on the plane or standing in line with at the grocery store, there is so much about this world that we know and we don’t know. And that is very humbling.”

Harris continued, “To realize the dreams that people have, the struggles that they’ve overcome, and the magnificence of that. To realize the beauty of the human spirit, that we are by nature, I think, as a species, we don’t give up.”

“Part of the key to our survival is that we are adaptable,” she added.

“But we are also ambitious. I applaud ambition. I applaud ambition. I think it is a good thing to reach, but not without also understanding that in so doing, one must do the hard work. One must understand the context in which they exist. One must be respectful.”

The former vice president also referenced her upbringing as a formative influence on her view of humility, recalling how her mother was treated due to her race and accent.

“I grew up in an environment where my — whether it was my mother, who was … like I said, 5 feet tall, a brown woman with an accent — and I would see how she was treated sometimes,” Harris said.

“And I grew up then seeing, when I would see that — infrequently, though it happened — where there was some assumption that because of her appearance, she was not what she actually was. She was one of the most intelligent people you could meet.”

Harris said those experiences shaped her understanding of inequality.

“I realized how there is a certain level of unfairness in the world in terms of how people determine a hierarchy and then place others in that stratum,” she said.

“And I learned to dislike it immensely. And understand that I think it’s a flaw to exist in a way that one thinks they are superior to another based on some very arcane measure of the work of another.”

She concluded her remarks by saying, “And maybe it is that way of thinking that makes me have a certain level of humility.”

“It is because I see the strength and the value and the magnificence and the majesty of so many, regardless of what they do, where they live, and I’m humbled to be among them.”

Following her comments, McGrath replied, “Well said,” and the audience responded with extended applause.

Harris’s public speaking style has drawn scrutiny in the past. During her 2024 presidential campaign, political analysts and commentators raised concerns that her frequent use of ambiguous phrasing and complex, nonspecific language could undercut her public messaging.

Harris went on to lose the 2024 general election to President Donald Trump, falling short in all seven battleground states and the national popular vote. Trump gained support across several key voting blocs, including younger nonwhite voters.

Please visit Drew Berquist.com for more articles like this.

Democrats

The Exact Moment Kamala Harris Ditched Joe Biden in Her Campaign Revealed

During a September 2024 memorial event marking the 23rd anniversary of the September 11 attacks, Joe Biden was captured on video briefly wearing a red Trump campaign hat, a moment that reportedly marked the end of his joint public appearances with Vice President Kamala Harris ahead of the election.

The event took place in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, where Biden had been meeting with first responders.

During the visit, Biden engaged with a Trump supporter and, in what the White House at the time described as a “gesture of unity,” placed the Trump-branded cap on his head while speaking with the individual.

Footage from the event shows Biden interacting casually with the group before briefly wearing the red cap, which bore Donald Trump’s campaign branding.

While the White House downplayed the moment as a bipartisan gesture, new details published in the book Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again suggest the episode caused internal tension within the administration—particularly with Vice President Kamala Harris.

According to the book, Harris was deeply frustrated by the incident. Upon seeing the footage of Biden wearing the hat, she reportedly turned to her team and asked, “What is he doing?”

She continued, “This is completely unhelpful. And so unnecessary.”

The book asserts that this moment was the final time Harris appeared alongside Biden at a public event before the 2024 election.

The Trump campaign quickly seized on the incident, circulating the footage and mocking the optics of the moment.

“Kamala did so bad in last night’s debate, Joe Biden just put on a Trump hat,” the campaign posted on social media.

Another post from the campaign added, “Thanks for the support, Joe!”

The 9/11 memorial in Shanksville was one of several high-profile appearances Biden made in September 2024, as public scrutiny over his cognitive and physical fitness intensified following a series of on-camera stumbles and media reports questioning his capacity to continue his reelection campaign.

The event, meant to mark a solemn national anniversary, ended up becoming part of the broader political narrative surrounding the campaign.

Original Sin, authored by CNN anchor Jake Tapper and Axios reporter Alex Thompson, has drawn attention for its detailed account of the Biden White House in the months leading up to the 2024 election.

The book highlights numerous behind-the-scenes incidents that reportedly contributed to internal disagreements among senior staff and campaign figures, with the 9/11 event cited as a flashpoint between Biden and Harris.

The White House has not publicly responded to the new claims made in the book.

As of now, there has been no official comment from either Harris or Biden’s post-presidency office on the reported fallout from the event.

Please visit RVM News for more stories like this.

Democrats, Govt Corruption

Dan Bongino Confirms FBI Is Reviewing White House Cocaine, SCOTUS Leak, Jan. 6 Pipe Bombs

Dan Bongino Confirms FBI Is Reviewing White House Cocaine, SCOTUS Leak, Jan. 6 Pipe Bombs

FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino announced the agency is now reviewing three high-profile cases under the Biden-Harris administration which had previously gone unresolved, including the January 6 pipe bomb incident, the 2022 Supreme Court draft opinion leak, and the cocaine discovery inside the White House.

In a post on X, Bongino revealed that he and FBI Director Kash Patel made the decision “to either re-open, or push additional resources and investigative attention, to these cases.”

The news follows increased scrutiny from lawmakers and the public over the lack of resolution in each of the investigations.

“I receive requested briefings on these cases weekly and we are making progress,” Bongino stated.

The FBI deputy director also urged the public to assist in the investigations by submitting any relevant information or tips directly to the agency.

January 6 Pipe Bomb Case

The first case being reviewed involves the pipe bombs discovered at the Republican National Committee (RNC) and Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters on January 6, 2021.

Surveillance footage shows an unidentified individual placing the bombs near the buildings the night before.

Despite years of investigation, no arrests have been made, raising concerns about transparency and thoroughness.

Supreme Court Leak

The second case centers on the leak of a draft opinion in the Supreme Court’s landmark Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision.

The leaked draft, published by Politico in 2022, revealed that the Court was poised to overturn Roe v. Wade, which it officially did the following month.

The leak sparked protests outside the homes of several justices and led to an attempted assassination of Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

In 2023, the Court announced that its internal investigation failed to identify the leaker.

White House Cocaine Discovery

The third unresolved case occurred in July 2023, when the Secret Service found a small bag of cocaine inside the White House.

The discovery came shortly after Hunter Biden, the president’s son, had visited the building.

Despite Hunter’s well-documented history of cocaine addiction, the Secret Service closed its investigation without identifying a suspect.

At the time, President Trump demanded transparency over how cocaine was discovered inside one of the most secure buildings in the world.

FBI Reform Teams Expanding

Bongino also confirmed that the FBI is expanding its internal reform teams.

“We will have new hires for our reform teams on board by next week,” he wrote. “This will help us both in doubling down on our reform agenda.”

Please visit The Daily Fetched for more stories like this.

Democrats

Triggered Dem Lawmaker Cries “White Supremacy” After Colleagues Stormed ICE Facility

Federal authorities are investigating a recent incident at the Delaney Hall Detention Center in Newark, New Jersey, where multiple Democratic lawmakers were involved in a confrontation with federal officers.

The Department of Justice has confirmed an active investigation into the matter, and a resolution to censure the lawmakers involved is currently being considered by members of Congress.

The confrontation occurred last week when several Democratic officials, including Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ), Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ), Rep. Robert Menendez Jr. (D-NJ), and Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, entered the detention center without following established protocols.

The facility is currently housing individuals who are in the country illegally.

Video footage from the scene shows Rep. McIver yelling at and physically engaging with law enforcement officers, including pushing and using her body to strike agents multiple times.

The altercation was captured on camera and circulated widely, prompting swift responses from lawmakers and law enforcement agencies.

Despite the footage, Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman denied that her colleague engaged in physical aggression, stating, “She didn’t touch them.”

She later amended her statement, adding, “She may have, like, pushed away to get them off of her, but she didn’t body slam anybody.”

Coleman dismissed the incident as exaggerated, saying, “It’s a bunch of crap that they would think that a member of Congress would do something like that.”

Rep. Coleman also claimed the group was denied lawful access to the facility, which she described as unacceptable.

When asked by reporters why the group forced its way inside and bypassed security protocols, she responded with a heated statement: “Bullsh*t!”

She continued, “Un-Americaning in an unamerican society with a unitarian government that abuses power on all levels and treats Congress members as if we are the enemy. You know who the enemy is? The enemy is the enemy of the people, and that’s the white supremacist that you’re talking about.”

Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested on Friday in connection with the incident. Charges stemming from the event are expected to be reviewed as the DOJ inquiry progresses.

In addition to the confrontation in Newark, Rep. Watson Coleman made headlines during a House hearing on Wednesday.

While questioning Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, she used her allotted time to accuse the Trump administration of “racist attacks” and launched into a racially charged tirade.

Kennedy remained composed during the hearing and responded only after Coleman’s time had expired.

Before an appropriations committee hearing on Thursday morning, a reporter confronted Rep. Watson Coleman for comment on the events.

She declined to expand on her previous remarks but reaffirmed her belief that McIver acted in self-defense and that the actions of law enforcement were inappropriate.

No timeline has been released by the Department of Justice regarding the conclusion of its investigation.

Meanwhile, the House continues to weigh disciplinary measures, including possible censure, for lawmakers involved in the unauthorized entry and physical altercation at the federal facility.

Please visit Drew Berquist.com for more stories like this.


Scroll to Top