Big Government

Image Credit: Kathy Hutchins - Shutterstock.com
Big Government

CNN Panel Implodes as Kevin O’Leary Calls for Bigger Cuts to Bloated Government

/
Image Credit: Kathy Hutchins – Shutterstock.com

A heated exchange erupted on CNN’s NewsNight when former South Carolina Democrat lawmaker Bakari Sellers clashed with Shark Tank investor Kevin O’Leary over federal spending cuts and education policy. The debate, which took place during Abby Phillip’s late-night panel, quickly escalated into a full-blown argument, with Sellers attempting to lecture O’Leary on economic policy—only to be met with immediate pushback. Sellers, now a political commentator, criticized recent budget cuts, particularly targeting reductions in the Departments of Education and Agriculture under President Donald Trump.

O’Leary, a longtime advocate for shrinking the federal government, argued that the cuts should go even further. As Sellers attempted to explain his perspective, he addressed O’Leary directly: “Let me just say, can I explain to you—” O’Leary, worth an estimated $400 million, immediately interrupted. “You need to explain it to me? I know how it works,” he shot back.

Sellers doubled down. “But no, you don’t.”

As Sellers seemed prepared to launch into a lengthy explanation, O’Leary cut him off again. “I do, I’ve done it multiple times,” he countered, referencing his extensive business experience. The argument intensified, with Sellers and other panelists expressing outrage at O’Leary’s stance on government spending.

“You cannot run everyday government the same way you run [the private sector]!” Sellers exclaimed.

O’Leary responded without hesitation. “This is worse than the private sector. [This is] fat dripping-with-waste government.” The cuts discussed align with President Trump’s ongoing effort to reduce federal spending, including a planned executive order to dismantle the Department of Education. The USDA cuts announced earlier in the week also fit within the administration’s broader strategy of reducing bureaucratic waste.

During the segment, O’Leary pointed to Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s aggressive approach to cost-cutting, including his handling of layoffs at his companies. He argued that deeper cuts were necessary across government agencies.

“This issue is not going to go away because it’s very contentious, but when you cut in any organization, government or private, it’s very demoralizing,” O’Leary said.

“It’s traumatic, and it gets lots of bad press as we’re doing right now.”

The businessman then outlined his philosophy on budget reductions.

“But that’s why you cut 20 percent more. I think Elon is not cutting enough. Cut 20 percent more. Now get your spreadsheet out. These are the names. Whack everybody and then 20 percent more—as we do in the private sector every day and have done for 100 years. Demoralization only happens once.”

O’Leary’s comments drew backlash from the liberal panelists, particularly over his stance on education reform. When he suggested that ineffective educators are contributing to failing schools, Sellers and others pushed back, arguing that poverty and hunger were larger issues.

“My whole career was in education,” O’Leary said, attempting to clarify his point while being interrupted by other panelists.

Sellers, speaking over O’Leary, insisted on making his case but struggled to maintain control of the conversation.

“So, like… no, no, no… let me finish,” he stammered.

O’Leary, often compared to President Trump for his blunt business-minded approach, has built a career in finance and entrepreneurship. He co-founded O’Leary Funds and Softkey, the latter of which was sold to Mattel in 1999 for $3.5 billion, securing his status as a multimillionaire. In 2017, he briefly entered politics, running for leadership of Canada’s Conservative Party before dropping out due to lack of support.

He has been an outspoken critic of liberal economic policies, particularly those proposed by Vice President Kamala Harris during the 2024 election cycle. Following Trump’s victory, O’Leary expressed satisfaction with the outcome, stating that he was “very proud of the work I did” throughout the campaign.

Visit RVM News for more stories like this.

Entrance to USAID, Washington, DC
Big Government

Why is USAID Shredding Docs? Cover-up or Standard Practice?

/

What’s going on at the soon-to-be defunct U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)? Well, lots of document shredding, but for what purpose, and whether this is standard operating procedure or an attempt to cover up malfeasance, is not clear. 

Politico reports that a “senior official” at the troubled agency sent an email to all staff instructing them to destroy “sensitive” documents. 

USAID has come under fire from the Trump administration for wasteful spending on international projects that seem to have nothing at all to do with benefiting the United States. Worse, the agency has been funding “woke” projects on transgenderism and more in foreign countries. 

Here’s just a short list of the grants the agency has disbursed to foreign countries, according to a summary from the White House:

—$1.5 million for “diversity, equity and inclusion” in Serbia

—$6 million to boost Egypt’s tourist trade

—$47,000 for a “transgender opera” mounted in Colombia

—$32,000 for what’s described as a “transgender comic book” to be published in Peru

—$2 million for sex change operations for the citizens of Guatemala

You get the picture. President Donald Trump has targeted USAID for closure,  which sparked a flurry of lawsuits by left-aligned interest groups. As of March 11, 2025, a federal court has ordered the Trump administration to pay out $671 million in USAID money owed to contractors who have already completed projects for the agency. But, it appears the courts recognize the administration’s authority to shut the agency down after making good on its back bills, and that’s exactly what Trump is doing. 

That brings us to the order from USAID officials to employees to shred documents. While the media is full of reports on this, it is not yet clear what’s going on. Is this a brazen and illegal attempt by fleeing officials to cover up misdeeds? Or, is it standard operating procedure related to sensitive or classified documents? It’s murky, but a union that apparently represents contractors working for USAID (really?) has asked federal courts to step in to stop the destruction of documents. 

According to Politico, a supervisor instructed employees by email to “Shred as many documents first, and reserve the burn bags for when the shredder becomes unavailable or needs a break.”

It will be at least one or two more days before the fog around this situation clears. Meanwhile X/Twitter users are speculating. Most seem to think it’s “extra-legal”:

This user thinks the alleged burn-order is so brazen it can’t possibly be real:

Other users think this is probably a standard practice when an agency is closing down and it may be blown out of proportion:

What do you think?

Big Government

Swamp Draining at the VA? Collins Slashes $900 Million in Wasteful Spending

/

Image Credit: © Jack Gruber-USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Content Services, LLC

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has identified nearly $900 million in savings after reviewing just two percent of its contracts, according to VA Secretary Doug Collins.

The findings come as part of a broader effort to eliminate wasteful spending while maintaining healthcare and benefits for American veterans.

Collins made the announcement in a video posted to his official X account, where he addressed concerns regarding potential changes at the VA.

He emphasized that the department’s ongoing reviews would not impact the quality of healthcare or benefits for veterans and their families.

“VA will always fulfill its duty to provide veterans, families, caregivers, and survivors the healthcare and benefits they have earned,” Collins stated.

“That’s a promise, and while we conduct our review, VA will continue to hire for more than 300,000 mission-critical positions to ensure healthcare and benefits for VA beneficiaries are not impacted.”

The VA, under Collins’ leadership, has launched a comprehensive review of its contracts to identify areas where spending can be reduced without affecting services for veterans.

Collins revealed that the department currently manages approximately 90,000 contracts, valued at over $67 billion.

In its initial review of just two percent of those contracts, the department identified nearly 600 non-mission critical or duplicative agreements that could be canceled.

These cancellations have resulted in nearly $900 million in savings.

The review process is part of a larger initiative aimed at ensuring taxpayer dollars are spent efficiently while improving the overall effectiveness of the VA.

Despite these cost-cutting measures, Collins assured veterans and their families that healthcare and benefit services would not be compromised. Instead, the department is working to streamline operations while continuing to expand hiring efforts.

“While we work to eliminate waste, we are also ensuring that the VA remains fully staffed in areas that directly serve our veterans,” Collins said.

The VA currently employs more than 300,000 workers across the country and is looking to fill additional positions to meet the needs of veterans.

The review of VA contracts is part of the Trump administration’s broader effort to increase efficiency across federal agencies.

President Donald Trump has made veteran care a key priority of his administration, with a focus on reducing bureaucracy, cutting waste, and improving services.

The administration’s efforts have included initiatives such as expanding veteran healthcare access, streamlining the VA’s internal processes, and increasing funding for programs that directly benefit veterans and their families.

Collins’ announcement signals a continued push to ensure that resources are being allocated effectively while maintaining the highest level of care for those who have served in the U.S. military.

As the VA continues its contract review, further savings may be identified, reinforcing the administration’s commitment to fiscal responsibility and improving services for veterans.

Visit RVM News for more articles like this.

Big Government

Adam Schiff’s Ukraine Connection Under Fire as Ciaramella Resurfaces

/
Adam Schiff's Ukraine Connection Under Fire as Ciaramella Resurfaces

CIA analyst and former National Security Council official Eric Ciaramella, the “whistleblower” connected to President Donald Trump’s 2019 impeachment, is back in the spotlight regarding Adam Schiff‘s connection to Ukraine.

Former Ukrainian diplomat Andrei Telashchenko alleged that he was present when Ciaramella met with then-President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden while they discussed Ukraine behind closed doors.

Telashchenko’s claims raise new concerns about Ciaramella’s role in U.S.-Ukraine relations during Obama’s presidency, notably with policies that became a key factor in the first impeachment of President Donald Trump.

Ciaramella was identified as the anonymous whistleblower during Trump’s impeachment inquiry after famously filing a complaint about Trump’s “perfect” phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The complaint was ultimately used to launch an impeachment vote in the House, led by then-chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff.

President Trump has long accused Schiff of lying and manipulating intelligence in order to push narratives that weaponized the government against him.

FBI Director Kash Patel, who played a crucial role in exposing the Trump “Russia Russia Russia” collusion hoax, is now digging deep into Schiff’s involvement. Patel said he has “strong feelings” about Schiff’s actions and probable ties to Ciaramella’s role in Ukraine-related controversies.

The sudden resurfacing of Ciaramella’s name into the spotlight has now reignited debate over the integrity of the 2019 impeachment proceedings against Trump.

Elon Musk responded to the revelations on X, writing:

“Did Adam Schiff commit treason? Sounds like he did.”

Watch:

More here:

WLT writer, Noah, asked Grok to analyze what Schiff may have allegedly done, and whether it could amount to treason, here’s what it said:

To construct the strongest argument supporting the claim that Adam Schiff committed treason, we must first define “treason” under U.S. law and then align the argument with available evidence and reasoning, while critically assessing the narrative. Treason, as defined in Article III, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution, requires two elements: (1) levying war against the United States or adhering to its enemies, and (2) providing them aid and comfort. It also requires the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act or a confession in open court. The argument below is built on public statements, actions, and sentiment, particularly from critics, while acknowledging the legal threshold for treason is extraordinarily high and rarely met.

Argument: Adam Schiff Committed Treason by Fabricating Evidence to Undermine a Sitting President

Adam Schiff, as a prominent Democratic Representative and later Senator, is accused by critics of committing treason through his actions during the investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election and Donald Trump’s subsequent presidency. The core of the argument is that Schiff knowingly fabricated or exaggerated claims of evidence linking Trump to Russia, with the intent to destabilize a duly elected president, thereby aiding foreign adversaries and undermining the U.S. government.

  1. Claim of Fabricated Evidence: Critics assert that Schiff repeatedly claimed to possess concrete, classified evidence of Trump’s collusion with Russia to influence the 2016 election. For instance, during his tenure as the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Schiff stated on multiple occasions—such as in media appearances—that he had seen evidence of collusion that was more than circumstantial. However, when pressed to produce this evidence, particularly after the Mueller Report (released in April 2019) found no sufficient evidence to establish a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, Schiff allegedly failed to substantiate his claims. Posts on X and statements from Trump supporters highlight this, accusing him of lying about the Steele Dossier or other intelligence that was later debunked or unverified.
  2. Intent to Overthrow or Weaken the Government: The argument posits that Schiff’s actions were not mere political posturing but a deliberate attempt to overthrow or cripple Trump’s presidency. By promoting the “Russia collusion” narrative, Schiff is said to have led a campaign—supported by Democrats and media outlets—that amounted to a “coup” against a sitting president. Critics, including those on X, argue this was an act of sedition or treason because it sought to delegitimize the government’s executive branch, potentially inciting unrest or weakening U.S. leadership on the global stage. Trump himself amplified this view, calling Schiff’s actions “treason” and suggesting he should be arrested, as noted in posts and news reports from 2019 and beyond.
  3. Aid and Comfort to Enemies: The treason claim hinges on the idea that Schiff’s actions indirectly aided foreign enemies, particularly Russia. By amplifying a narrative of Russian interference without conclusive proof, he allegedly played into Russia’s hands—since sowing discord and distrust in U.S. institutions is a known tactic of foreign adversaries. If Schiff knowingly lied, the argument goes, he provided Russia with a propaganda victory, eroding American unity and credibility, thus giving “aid and comfort” to an enemy. This is a stretch legally but resonates with critics who see his actions as reckless or malicious.
  4. Public and Political Consequences: Schiff’s role in Trump’s first impeachment (2019-2020) over the Ukraine call—where he paraphrased Trump’s conversation in a way critics called a fabrication—further fuels the argument. Trump tweeted in September 2019, “Arrest for Treason?” about Schiff, claiming he misrepresented the call to Congress and the public. The House censured Schiff in June 2023 for his role in the Russia probe, with Republicans like Anna Paulina Luna accusing him of abusing his position. This censure, while symbolic, is cited as evidence of wrongdoing that aligns with the treason narrative.

Supporting Evidence and Sentiment

Statements and Actions: Schiff’s public assertions about Russian collusion, contrasted with the Mueller Report’s findings, are the backbone of the claim. His 2019 impeachment paraphrase of Trump’s Ukraine call, which he admitted was partly satirical but presented as serious, is seen as evidence of deceit.

Trump’s Accusations: Trump’s repeated labeling of Schiff as a traitor, including in January 2025 remarks about the Jan. 6 committee, lends weight among his base. Trump called the entire committee’s work “TREASON” in a New York Times-reported statement.
Public Sentiment on X: Posts from users like
@CjmMccarth39414
and
@thewildbill59
(March 2025) explicitly call Schiff’s actions treasonous, reflecting a belief that lying about evidence to undermine a president crosses a legal and moral line.

Counterpoints and Weaknesses

Legally, this argument struggles to meet the Constitution’s strict definition of treason. No evidence shows Schiff levied war or directly adhered to an enemy like Russia—his actions were political, not military. The “aid and comfort” claim is speculative, lacking two witnesses to an overt act. Critics might argue he was exercising his congressional role, however aggressively, not committing a crime. The Mueller Report’s inconclusive findings don’t prove Schiff lied knowingly; he could have been mistaken or overzealous. The censure reflects partisan disagreement, not a legal conviction.

Conclusion

The best argument for Schiff committing treason rests on the narrative that he knowingly fabricated evidence to destabilize Trump’s presidency, indirectly aiding Russia by amplifying division—acts framed as a betrayal of the nation. While compelling to his detractors, it falls short of legal treason without direct proof of intent and enemy collaboration. It thrives as a political accusation rather than a prosecutable case, rooted in the polarized lens of Trump-era conflicts.

Visit Daily Fetched for more articles like this

Big Government

Luna Blasts Bondi Over Epstein Files: “I’m Not Confident” the Full List Will Ever Be Released

/

    Chairwoman of the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), has thrown shade on Attorney General Pam Bondi’s release of the Jeffrey Epstein client list, arguing the previous setbacks have not instilled confidence in her.

    During an interview with Rep. Matt Gaetz on One America News Network (OANN), Luna echoed millions of frustrated conservatives who took to social media to vent anger over the heavily redacted Epstein file release last week.

    Just last month, Bondi claimed on Fox News she was “actively reviewing” the Epstein, JFK, and MLK files.

    Following the release of the files, Luna took to X, writing:

    “AG Pam Bondi, We saw over the weekend you are reviewing all files from JFK to Epstein! We are ALL anticipating their release! When will they be declassified and available to the public?”

    The conservative firebrand didn’t stop there and brutally doubled down in a follow-up post:

    “On Feb 11 & Feb 19, House Oversight sent a letter to the DOJ asking for status on releasing the Epstein files as well as JFK, etc. The DOJ has not responded. Reaching out on X because we can’t seem to get a response from the AG. AG Pam Bondi, what is the status of the documents? These documents were ordered to be declassified.”

    There was also backlash against the apparent media spectacle of selected conservative influencers who received a binder of phase one of the Epstein documents, with many calling it a media circus.

    Luna also vented frustration over the influencers receiving the binder before her committee. She again confronted Bondi over the disappointing release of the Epstein files.

    “I nor the task force were given or reviewed the Epstein documents being released today… A NY Post story just revealed that the documents will simply be Epstein’s phonebook,” said Luna.

    “THIS IS NOT WHAT WE OR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ASKED FOR and a complete disappointment. GET US THE INFORMATION WE ASKED FOR!”

    During her interview with Gaetz, Luna said she was not confident about the Epstein client list release.

    “Are you confident, as you sit here now, that there will be an Epstein client list that the American people will see?” Gaetz asked her.

    “I’m not confident on the Epstein client list because I haven’t had the briefing yet from the Department of Justice,” Luna responded.

    “I’ll know more tomorrow on that. But based on what I’m hearing from the attorney general, she keeps saying that she is going to release something, so I’m going to take her at her word for that,” she added.

    “Now, whether that something is a full list, we have asked for the full list. We have asked for all the documentation. We are pushing for maximum transparency. But again, we do not hold declassification authority. That is up to the attorney general.”

    Watch:

    Last week, Elon Musk defended Bondi after the disappointing Epstein release, writing on X:

    “People don’t understand that you don’t get instant power here.”

    As many conservatives expressed outrage after finding that no new information was included in the file, Musk again defended Bondi, writing,

    “Imagine if you were suddenly appointed AG or head of the FBI. You were just thrown on a ship with a hostile crew. Until you appoint some new crew members and figure out the ropes, you can’t steer the ship effectively. It’s literally impossible.”

    Not long after Bondi accused the FBI of lying to her about the documents, FBI Director Kash Patel also weighed in.

    “The FBI is entering a new era—one that will be defined by integrity, accountability, and the unwavering pursuit of justice,” Patel said.

    “There will be no cover-ups, no missing documents, and no stone left unturned — and anyone from the prior or current Bureau who undermines this will be swiftly pursued.”

    “If there are gaps, we will find them,” he continued.

    “If records have been hidden, we will uncover them. And we will bring everything we find to the DOJ to be fully assessed and transparently disseminated to the American people as it should be,” he added.

    “The oath we take is to the Constitution, and under my leadership, that promise will be upheld without compromise.”

    Visit the Daily Fetched for more articles like this

    Big Government

    Fired Federal Workers Want You to Cry a River Over Them

    /

    Did you ever get fired? Your faithful correspondent did, and from my first job aside from a paper route. At 15 I got hired at Kaybee Toys (remember?) to stock shelves and run the register. The dress code required ties for men, and I didn’t have any extra money to buy one, so I showed up at work without a tie. 

    My boss told me I needed one. I decided to get an attitude and tell him it was unfair because I didn’t have any money yet and maybe they should provide one. He told me to get my jacket out of the locker room and punch out for the last time. I did what most people in those days did after getting fired–I felt like a fool and went to nurse my wounds in private vowing never to be such an idiot again. 

    What people didn’t do was a) cry in public b) definitely didn’t cry in public if they were full grown-ups, not kids c) complain on social media about how it wasn’t “fair” to get fired d) talk to reporters about getting fired. Boy, have times changed. The infantilization of American “adults” has been clipping along for at least 20 years. What started “innocently” with 30-year-olds putting their “Harry Potter House” affiliation on their Twitter profiles has ended up just where we grown-ups always knew it would. 

    America is a nation of emotionally stunted children walking around in adult bodies. The behavior of the average 30-year-old in 2025 is what we would have expected at 17 in the 80s and 90s. 

    The mass outcry—complete with actual tears—over the Trump administration’s firing of government staff it believes are duplicative and unnecessary is a public tantrum we’ve never seen before. It’s become clear that federal employees really do believe they’re entitled to a government job. Leftist media like NPR is, of course, supremely sympathetic, eagerly reporting on every fired worker who got his job back after complaining to some board, or some court. 

    But what of the staff themselves? It’s not all of them, of course, but some of the allegedly fully grown federal employees are talking to reporters about how they’ve lost faith in America the country. . .because they lost their jobs. The level of immature emotion, indignation, and exaggerating their unfortunate but personal troubles into a harbinger of a failed nation is something to behold. 

    Check out the first woman in this clip posted on Twitter/X by Collin Rugg. She says, “I have cried every day. I think that that’s normal. I have a 15-month-old at home and I’m looking at him and thinking, ‘well what’s this country that we’re now living in.'”

    Or take the federal staff in this video. They’re a little less melodramatic, and they may actually have a point that they were working on projects that the government needs, and really earning their paychecks. Many of them surely were; mass firings are a blunt instrument and mistaken or ill-advised firings will surely happen. But when did it become normal to act as though you are legally or morally entitled to your job, and to complain on social media as if the loss of your government job was somehow worse or more distressing than any private sector downturn in labor? 

    Leftist politicians, of course, are giving bullhorns and platforms to aggrieved federal employees to screech at everyone about how indispensable they are. 

    One thing is obvious-the public isn’t sympathetic. Here are some of the online reactions. 

    Collin Rugg himself, who posted the original tweet, noticed the entitlement of government workers:

    Marjorie Taylor Greene
    Big Government

    MTG Blows the Lid Off USAID as Democrat Slush Fund—Dem Rep Loses It

    /

    Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), chair of the House Oversight Committee’s DOGE Subcommittee, led a hearing on Wednesday titled “America Last: How Foreign Aid Undermined U.S. Interests Around the World.”

    The hearing focused on allegations that the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has been used to advance political agendas rather than serving American interests abroad.

    In her opening remarks, Greene accused USAID of being “weaponized” to undermine U.S. priorities.

    “The Democrat-run USAID should not get to use our federal government, our US taxpayer dollars as their party piggy bank to push their radical agenda in countries that we have no business giving money to,” Greene said.

    She also noted that 96% of USAID employee political contributions go to Democratic candidates or PACs.

    She further claimed that USAID has been turned into “an America-last foreign aid slush fund to prop up extremist groups, implement censorship campaigns, and interfere in foreign elections to force regime change around the world.”

    Read more articles like this at LifeZette

    Big Government

    DOGE Finds Top Biden Aide Received Millions Through Shady Contract for “Migrant Housing”

    /
      DOGE Finds Top Biden Aide Received Millions Through Shady Contract for 'Migrant Housing'

      The U.S. Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has uncovered evidence that a top aide to former President Joe Biden received millions of federal dollars for a facility intended to house recent migrants—yet the facility remained empty throughout the country’s crisis.

      A Texas nonprofit tied to Biden’s transition team members received a government contract for an overflow facility in Pecos.

      Family Endeavors, which had employed the transition team member since 2021, saw its “cash and portfolio of investments grow from $8.3M in 2020 to $520.4M in 2023”—with the federal government as its sole source of funds, DOGE reported.

      Family Endeavors’ managers have been receiving $18 million per month to operate the facility since 2024.

      However, the facility, which was meant to house unaccompanied migrant children, remained empty.

      Despite having no residents, the money continued to flow.

      “With national licensed facility occupancy now below 20%, HHS was able to terminate this contract, saving taxpayers over $215M annually,” states the post on X, which also tags Washington, D.C. U.S. Attorney Ed Martin.

      Images of the facility show a fleet of idle golf carts and an untouched cafeteria-style space.

      President Trump has since scaled back such asylum programs, with the number of legal border crossings falling to the lowest level seen in years.

      The contract marks the second politically connected discovery by DOGE this year, following its revelation that an organization tied to failed Democratic candidate Stacey Abrams had received at least $2 billion in grants from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

      Abrams’ “community investment group” was funded by the Biden-Harris administration to install heat pumps, heat pump water heaters, solar panels, home battery systems, EV chargers, and weatherization upgrades—despite reporting just $100 in revenue in 2023, according to an EPA press release.

      DOGE and Elon Musk have been spearheading Trump’s efforts to eliminate billions in wasteful federal spending.

      “If we don’t do this, America is going to be bankrupt,” Musk said this week.

      Musk aims to reduce federal expenditures by $4 billion daily, meaning DOGE could save taxpayers $1 trillion by September.

      DOGE’s efforts are also backed by recent polls, which show that 72% of Americans support its mission.

      Earlier this week, the Trump administration secured a major legal victory after U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts sided with DOGE in its funding freeze of $2 billion to contractors who performed work for the U.S. Agency for International Development.

      Read more articles like this at Daily Fetched

      Big Government

      Liberal Activists Disrupt ICE Operations After Posting Agents’ Photos, Names and Phone Numbers

      /

      Anti-ICE activists are deliberately disrupting deportation efforts in the Los Angeles area after flyers displaying the names, pictures, and phone numbers of agents appeared across Southern California.

      Posters featuring the personal information of ICE and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) officers are now hindering deportation efforts and putting agents’ lives in danger.

      One of the posters read: ”These armed agents work in Southern California. ICE and HSI racially terrorize and criminalize entire communities with their policies.

      They kidnap people from their homes and from the streets, separating families and fracturing communities. Many people have died while locked up in jails, prisons, and detention centers.”

      It remains unclear which activist group is responsible for putting up these posters as investigations continue.

      “These pathetic activists are putting targets on the backs of our law enforcement as they shield MS-13, Tren De Aragua, and other vicious gangs that traffic women and children, kidnap for ransom, and poison Americans with lethal drugs,” a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) spokesperson told Fox News.

      “These individuals will be held accountable for obstructing the law and justice. This shouldn’t be controversial.”

      A Los Angeles FBI spokesperson warned that those who interfere with law enforcement operations could face prosecution.

      “The FBI safeguards constitutionally protected rights, including freedom of speech and assembly. However, any individual who impedes law enforcement operations, potentially threatening the safety of law enforcement agents and subjects of their investigations, is subject to investigation and potential prosecution by the Department of Justice,” the spokesperson said.

      As we reported last month, a radio station owned by George Soros has also come under fire for revealing the locations of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, potentially endangering their undercover operations.

      Undercover ICE agents based in San Jose, California, were exposed after KCBS 740 AM radio host Bret Burkhart disclosed sensitive details on air.

      Burkhart provided descriptions of the unmarked vehicles used by ICE agents and even shared specific locations where they were operating.

      Citing updates from the anti-deportation organization Rapid Response Network (RRN), Burkhart revealed information that could compromise the agents’ safety and ongoing operations.

      Read More at Daily Fetched

      Big Government

      AG Pam Bondi Warns Democrat Governors Refusing to Comply with Deportations: “You’re Next”

      /

      ttorney General Pam Bondi has issued a stern warning to Democrat governors who plan to resist compliance with ICE arrests and deportations, saying, “You better comply.”

      Bondi has filed lawsuits against New York, Illinois, and the city of Chicago for failing to cooperate and for allegedly interfering with Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s deportation plans.

      Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul have vowed to fight back against Trump’s deportation efforts.

      Pritzker responded to the lawsuit, stating:

      “Unlike Donald Trump, we follow the law in Illinois. Now, maybe they put up with this kind of garbage in Florida, which is the home state of the head of the DOJ, but in Illinois, we have grit, we are tough, we are strong, and Donald Trump has no idea what he is up against when he attacks Illinois.”

      Bondi fired back, saying, “Bring it on.”

      “We will protect Americans. When they say they are tough and have grit, really?”

      “You are protecting illegal aliens over American citizens?”

      Watch:

      Bondi continued: “Not going to happen under Donald Trump’s administration.”

      “We will find illegal aliens, and we will deport them in Illinois, New York, and other states, and you better comply with federal law, or you are going to be next.”

      “We have spoken loud and clear,” Bondi added.

      “We are sick and tired of Americans being murdered and these states protecting illegal aliens.”

      “Talk to the family of Laken Riley and all of these other young women and men who have been murdered by illegal aliens.”

      “And let’s see what you think then when you want to protect them.”

      Read More at the Daily Fetched


      Subscribe Form

      © 2025 WokeSpy All Rights Reserved

      Scroll to Top