Author name: Red Voice Media

Trans

Transgender ACLU Lawyer Makes Up New Term for Women and the Internet Explodes

ACLU lawyer and transgender rights activist Chase Strangio stirred controversy Tuesday during an appearance on the left-wing digital news show Democracy Now!, where she referred to biological women as “non-transgender women” while criticizing President Donald Trump’s executive order on sex and gender.

Strangio, a transgender man, expressed concern over the executive order, which clarifies the U.S. government’s stance on recognizing only two biological sexes, male and female.

Strangio appeared on the show to slam Trump’s executive order, titled “Defending women from gender ideology extremism and restoring biological truth to the federal government.”

The order asserts that biological men and women are distinct and mandates that agencies follow these directives.

One key provision of the order requires the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to create policies protecting women seeking single-sex spaces, such as rape shelters, from being forced to share spaces with individuals of the opposite biological sex.

Strangio objected to this part of the executive order, claiming that it could “exclude trans people from various forms of shelter” under the assumption that transgender individuals pose an inherent threat to “non-transgender women.”

She further argued that the executive order “enhances the risk that transgender people face in society” by treating them as a threat simply because of their existence in certain spaces.

Strangio’s comment referring to biological women as “non-transgender women” sparked a reaction online, with many critics questioning the terminology.

Conservative social media accounts shared clips of Strangio’s remarks, with one prominent account, End Wokeness, highlighting the moment with the caption, “ACLU lawyer Chase Strangio is panicking that Trump banned men from ‘non-trans women’ (women) locker rooms.”

Conservative commentator Paul Szypula also weighed in, criticizing Strangio’s remarks in a post on X. Szypula described Strangio as a “woman pretending to be a man” and mocked the idea that biological women should be referred to as “non-transgender women.” He added, “Chase can whine all she wants. That doesn’t change the fact that she has XX chromosomes and is a woman. So either she stays out of men’s bathrooms, or she goes to a women’s jail.”

Collin Rugg, co-owner of Trending Politics, also commented on Strangio’s terminology, writing, “NEW: Transgender ACLU lawyer Chase Strangio refers to biological women as ‘non-transgender women’ while losing it over Trump’s new executive orders. This voice catches me off guard every time.” Rugg quipped, “Life hack: You can save some time by simply referring to them as ‘women.’”

Strangio’s comments reflect the ongoing debate over gender identity and the rights of transgender individuals in the context of biological sex, particularly in spaces like shelters and bathrooms.

Critics argue that policies supporting single-sex facilities are essential for protecting the rights and safety of biological women, while others like Strangio view such policies as discriminatory toward transgender people.

The debate continues to gain traction as more states and government entities grapple with how to balance transgender rights with protections for women and other groups.

Read More at RVM News

Big Government, Uncategorized

John Bolton is Upset Over Trump Pulling His Security Detail and Clearance

Former National Security Adviser John Bolton has lost both his security clearance and Secret Service protection, as President Donald Trump moves to remove what he describes as “deep-state actors” from positions of influence.

The decision comes amid Trump’s ongoing efforts to reshape the federal government and hold former officials accountable for actions deemed detrimental to national security.

Shortly after Trump assumed office, the Secret Service detail assigned to Bolton was terminated.

Bolton responded on X, formerly Twitter, expressing his dissatisfaction with the decision while contrasting Trump’s actions with those of his successor, Joe Biden.

“I am disappointed but not surprised that President Trump has decided to terminate the protection previously provided by the United States Secret Service,” Bolton wrote.

He noted that Biden extended his protection in 2021 despite Bolton’s public criticisms of Biden’s national-security policies.

Bolton referenced the continuing threats to his safety, citing a 2022 criminal case against an Iranian Revolutionary Guard official accused of attempting to hire a hitman to target him.

“That threat remains today, as also demonstrated by the recent arrest of someone trying to arrange for President Trump’s own assassination,” Bolton stated.

In addition to losing his Secret Service protection, Bolton’s security clearance was revoked following the publication of his 2019 memoir, which detailed his time in the Trump administration.

Read More at RVM News

Big Cities

L.A. City Council Was Warned That Karen Bass’s Budget Cuts Would Lead to Death 

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass is under intense scrutiny after recent fires devastated Los Angeles County, becoming the costliest natural disaster in American history.

Criticism of her administration has mounted following revelations about significant budget cuts to the Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) and concerns about her leadership during the crisis.

Months before the fires began, Mayor Bass approved cuts totaling tens of millions of dollars to the LAFD budget.

Video evidence has surfaced showing multiple LAFD officials warning about the potential impact of these cuts on disaster response capabilities.

These warnings were issued just 21 days before the fires erupted, leaving at least 24 people dead—a number expected to rise as recovery efforts continue.

Critics have accused the city’s political leadership of ignoring these warnings, pointing to the devastating consequences for residents and first responders.

The LAFD’s reduced budget left critical resources stretched thin during the fires, exacerbating the disaster’s toll.

Amid the ongoing crisis, Mayor Bass left the country to attend the inauguration of Ghana’s president.

While Los Angeles County burned, Bass was reportedly seen at an embassy cocktail reception.

When questioned about her decision to travel during a disaster, Bass stated she had no regrets, a comment that has further fueled public outrage.

This trip has become a focal point of criticism, with many residents and commentators questioning her priorities.

Bass previously promised not to leave the country while in office, making her actions during this crisis particularly controversial.

Calls for Bass’s recall have intensified as the city grapples with the aftermath of the fires.

Critics argue that the mayor’s decisions, including the LAFD budget cuts, have directly contributed to the scale of the disaster.

Additionally, her administration’s allocation of funds has drawn scrutiny, with significant resources reportedly diverted to programs addressing homelessness, climate initiatives, and services for undocumented immigrants.

The LAFD itself has faced internal turmoil, with Fire Chief Kristin Crowley criticized for pushing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives that many argue distracted from the department’s core mission.

The mounting criticism has led to growing momentum for a recall effort against Mayor Bass.

Residents and political commentators alike have expressed frustration with her leadership during what many see as a preventable disaster.

The fire’s devastation and the perceived mismanagement by city leadership have left Bass politically vulnerable, with some calling for her to step down even if a recall effort does not succeed.

As Los Angeles works to recover from the fires, the focus remains on accountability and preventing similar disasters in the future.

The death toll, economic damage, and widespread criticism of the city’s response have underscored the need for effective leadership and resource allocation.

Mayor Bass has yet to publicly address the calls for her recall or the broader criticism of her handling of the crisis.

However, the political fallout from these events is likely to shape her future in public office.

Read More at RVM News

Big Government, Uncategorized

AOC’s Unhinged Rant in the House: Republicans Want to Examine Little Girls’ Genitals

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) took center stage in the House chamber to rail against the GOP-backed Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2025.

She accused Republicans of hypocrisy and using women’s rights as a smokescreen to push what she called a “bigoted” agenda targeting transgender girls.

“Here we are today, Republicans who have voted against consistently against the Violence Against Women Act, who have taken away the right of all women to choose and have control over their own body, who, as women, are bleeding out in parking lots across the country, standing there allowing us to die. Now want to pretend today that they care about women,” Ocasio-Cortez said, highlighting what she views as glaring contradictions in Republican priorities.

The bill, which seeks to ban transgender girls from participating in girls’ sports, has sparked fierce debate.

Ocasio-Cortez warned that its vague wording could pave the way for harmful enforcement practices. “The majority right now says there’s no place in this bill that says it opens up for gender genital examinations. Well, here’s the thing, there’s no enforcement mechanism in this bill, and when there is no enforcement mechanism, you open the door to every enforcement mechanism.”

Ocasio-Cortez argued that such legislation could lead to invasive scrutiny of young girls based on their appearance or behavior.

“What this also opens the door for is for women to try to perform a very specific kind of femininity, for the very kind of men who are drafting this bill, and to open up questioning of who is a woman because of how we look, how we present ourselves, and yes, what we choose to do with our bodies,” she said.

Her critique didn’t stop there. The congresswoman took aim at the bill’s backers, accusing them of having ulterior motives.

“I know who loves this bill. Yes, bigoted folks love this bill. Assaulters love this bill. But also CEOs love this bill, because Los Angeles is on fire right now, and this is the number one priority this majority has.”

Ocasio-Cortez also expressed frustration with what she sees as misplaced focus in Congress, urging lawmakers to address pressing issues like climate change.

“Los Angeles is on fire right now, and this is the number one priority this majority has,” she repeated, underscoring her belief that the bill distracts from more critical problems.

The Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act remains a lightning rod for controversy.

Supporters argue it ensures fairness in women’s sports, while critics, like Ocasio-Cortez, claim it promotes discrimination and infringes on personal autonomy.

With the debate heating up, Ocasio-Cortez’s impassioned speech has further polarized the discussion.

Read More at Red Voice News

Sports

Elon Musk Reportedly Considering Purchase of $5 Billion England Soccer Club

Tech billionaire Elon Musk, known for his ventures in technology and space exploration, as well as his influence in politics, may now be setting his sights on the world of sports.

Reports suggest Musk is considering purchasing Liverpool FC, one of the most storied soccer clubs in the English Premier League. Liverpool FC, nicknamed “The Reds,” is one of the most successful teams in English soccer history. The club has amassed 19 league titles, eight FA Cups, a record 10 League Cups, and 16 FA Community Shields.

On the international stage, Liverpool has won six European Cups, three UEFA Cups, four UEFA Super Cups—all English records—and one FIFA Club World Cup.

As of May 2024, Forbes valued Liverpool at $5.37 billion, ranking it as the fourth most valuable football team in the world.

The club’s prestige and financial standing make it an attractive prospect for potential buyers. Errol Musk, Elon’s father, confirmed his son’s interest in Liverpool during an interview with Times Radio. “Oh yes, but that doesn’t mean he’s buying it,” Errol Musk said. “He would like to, yes, obviously, anybody would want to. So would I.”

However, he added, “I can’t comment on that. They’ll raise the price.”

Errol Musk also shared that the family has connections to Liverpool. “We have relatives in Liverpool, and we were fortunate enough to know quite a few of the Beatles because they grew up with us—my family,” he said.

Despite the speculation, Fenway Sports Group (FSG), the current owners of Liverpool FC, has denied any plans to sell the club.

A spokesperson for the group told the Associated Press, “There is no truth to these rumors.”

In September 2023, FSG sold a minority stake in Liverpool to U.S. investment firm Dynasty Equity.

At that time, FSG president Mike Gordon reaffirmed the group’s commitment to the club. “Our long-term commitment to Liverpool remains as strong as ever,” Gordon said.

“We have always said that if there is an investment partner that is right for Liverpool, then we would pursue the opportunity to help ensure the club’s long-term financial resiliency and future growth.”

Musk has recently engaged in British political discourse, particularly following the center-left Labour Party’s victory in the July 2023 general election.

Through his social media platform, X (formerly Twitter), Musk has called for a new election, raising his profile in UK political matters.

While the rumors surrounding Musk’s interest in Liverpool FC have been denied by the club’s current owners, his reputation for bold and unexpected ventures keeps the possibility alive.

Whether Musk’s reported interest will lead to actual negotiations remains to be seen, but the speculation has already sparked discussions in both the sports and business worlds.

Read More at Red Voice Media

Left-wing extremism

ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith Goes Off on the Left’s Continued Lawfare Against Trump

ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith expressed sharp criticism regarding Judge Juan Merchan’s decision to schedule President-elect Donald Trump’s sentencing just days before his January 20 inauguration.

The sentencing, set for January 10, comes after Trump was convicted in May on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to a nondisclosure agreement with adult film actress Stormy Daniels.

On “The Stephen A. Smith Show,” Smith questioned the purpose of the sentencing, suggesting it served no practical purpose other than to tarnish Trump’s reputation. “This is the kind of stuff that just validates assertions about stuff being politicized,” Smith said.

“Maybe not specifically with Trump, but the suspicion definitely is there. What is the purpose of this? Is he going to jail? Are you going to give a fine? We got to sit up there and go through all the pomp and circumstance when you know you’re not going to do anything.”

Smith criticized Judge Merchan, noting that the case’s substance and timing seemed politically charged. “He was certified today as the next president of the United States of America. Come January 21st, he will be sworn in as the 47th president of the United States of America. But … you want to sentence him,” Smith said. “You’re Juan Merchan — who is he, the state Supreme Court justice in New York? You want to sentence him next Friday? And by the way, what is the sentencing about?”

The charges stem from allegations that Trump falsified business records to conceal payments made to Daniels during his 2016 presidential campaign.

Smith questioned the gravity of the case, comparing it to non-disclosure agreements commonly used in business and legal contexts. “Thirty-four felony counts … sounds very, very damaging. It’s a hush-money case,” Smith said.

“Essentially, the case against Donald Trump is that he is alleged to have engaged in relations with a former porn star and he made efforts involving finances to keep her mouth shut. That’s what all of this is about?”

Smith also took aim at Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who opposed Trump’s motion to dismiss the case and suggested Judge Merchan could use an abatement mechanism, typically applied when a defendant dies between conviction and sentencing.

“Why? That’s going to validate everything for you? Did you get him? Did you put him in jail? Did you prevent him from winning the election? No, you did not,” Smith said. “So now all you’re doing is further impugning the name of the president-elect, soon to be the 47th president of the United States.”

Smith emphasized that the sentencing would not include jail time, nor would it prevent Trump from taking office, signing laws, or fulfilling his duties as president.

He also referenced Trump’s recent political influence, including his role in securing Republican Mike Johnson’s election as Speaker of the House. Smith’s remarks highlight ongoing debates about the intersection of law and politics in high-profile cases. Trump’s legal team has consistently argued that the charges against him are politically motivated, while his supporters view the case as part of a broader effort to undermine his presidency and political career.

As Trump prepares to take office as the 47th president, the January 10 sentencing is likely to reignite discussions about the fairness and motivations behind the legal proceedings.

For now, Smith’s criticism reflects a growing skepticism among many Americans about the politicization of the legal system.

Read More at Red Voice Media

Big Government

New House Report: FBI, Secret Service Botched Investigation of January 6 Pipe Bombs

A House investigation has uncovered multiple security failures by federal law enforcement agencies following the discovery of live explosive devices placed near both Republican and Democratic headquarters in Washington, D.C., on January 6, 2021.

Two Republican-led subcommittees released an 81-page report Thursday, detailing what they described as “egregious safety and security failures” by the U.S. Capitol Police and the Secret Service that put Kamala Harris, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and several civilians at risk.

The investigation, led by Representatives Barry Loudermilk (R-AL) and Thomas Massie (R-KY), also revealed shortcomings in the FBI’s early efforts to track down the suspect responsible for planting the bombs.

Despite an extensive investigation, the FBI was unable to identify the suspect, and the case stalled after two months due to a lack of credible leads.

According to the report, the suspect, seen on surveillance footage wearing a hooded sweatshirt and face covering, planted two pipe bombs on the night before the scheduled certification of the 2020 election results at the U.S. Capitol.

As of the release of the report, the suspect remains at large, and the FBI is still offering a $500,000 reward for information leading to an arrest.

The bombs, which were described as “viable” by the FBI, remained in place for more than 16 hours. They were equipped with 60-minute timers.

The first bomb was discovered by a woman walking to an alley to do laundry around noon on January 6, near the Republican National Committee (RNC) headquarters.

A subsequent search led to the discovery of a second bomb outside the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters while Vice President Harris was inside the building.

The report outlined the failure of the Secret Service to identify the bomb outside the DNC despite conducting a security sweep in preparation for Harris’s arrival.

The report said, “Prior to Vice President-elect Harris’s 11:25 AM arrival, at least ten different USSS agents and two canine units came within feet of the pipe bomb yet never discovered the device.”

One agent reportedly spent five hours near the garage entrance without discovering the bomb.

Additionally, the report revealed that former Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s motorcade came “within feet” of the pipe bomb.

One person of interest had searched for “pipe bomb DC” on the internet, while another had recently purchased shoes similar to those worn by the suspect seen in the surveillance footage.

The FBI initially worked aggressively to follow leads, but the report states that by the end of February 2021, resources were diverted away from the case due to a lack of viable leads.

The discovery of the bombs, located a few blocks from the Capitol, came just as thousands of rioters breached the Capitol building.

Some conspiracy theories, amplified by figures such as former Rep. Matt Gaetz, suggested that law enforcement may have planted the bombs to distract police resources from the Capitol.

However, while the report did not provide evidence to support this theory, it did criticize the FBI for its vague description of the bombs as “viable,” noting that bomb technicians typically use more precise language to describe such devices.

“Traditionally, bomb technicians deliberately avoid using vague language, choosing instead to refer to a bomb as a ‘device’ if it would ‘function as designed’ or as a ‘hoax,’” the report stated. “In the case of the pipe bombs, it is unclear why the FBI insists on using a vague, non-standard description.”

The findings from the House investigation raise serious concerns about the adequacy of federal law enforcement’s response to the January 6th attacks and the threat posed by these explosive devices.

Despite the FBI’s efforts, the suspect remains unidentified, and key questions about the agency’s handling of the investigation continue to linger.

The report’s revelations about the lack of coordination and the failure to secure critical locations during a volatile time underscore the need for further scrutiny of how the federal government responds to such national security threats.

Read More at Red Voices Media

Uncategorized

Amish to the Rescue: 12 Homes Built in Less Than 48 Hours For NC Hurricane Victims

In response to the growing housing crisis, a surprising group of volunteers has come to the aid of the community in western North Carolina: Amish families from Central Pennsylvania.

According to the High Country Press, members of this Amish community became aware of the devastation through a local resident who had visited the area.

Motivated to help, they contacted Andy Owens, who had established a base camp in the Meat Camp Area of Watauga County.

Owens helped coordinate the logistics, while the Amish community provided the manpower, materials, and funding.

On December 17, 62 men, women, and children from the Amish community traveled by bus, bringing with them five trailers filled with supplies, tools, and building equipment.

The Amish, who generally avoid modern technology, made an exception for this project, recognizing the critical need for housing in the region.

Upon their arrival around noon, they immediately began working. By 5 p.m. that same day, eight housing structures had been completed.

While the men and boys worked on construction, the women and girls focused on providing food and distributing pallets of toys and clothing to those in need.

Within less than two days, the group had constructed 12 fully built housing structures, which only required minor finishing touches, such as electrical work.

In addition to the homes, the Amish also donated 20 propane tanks, tools, and five pallets of supplies for local fire department rescue workers.

The total cost of the project was estimated at around $300,000, all of which was furnished by the Amish community.

Traveling hundreds of miles and working tirelessly for two days, these volunteers provided much-needed homes for people they will likely never meet.

This story serves as a reminder that acts of kindness and service can come from unexpected places.

The Amish, who are often the subject of jokes and misunderstandings due to their refusal to embrace modern conveniences, have proven that their dedication to their faith and community can make a tangible difference in the lives of others.

Their efforts in western North Carolina are a testament to the power of selfless action and the importance of helping those in need, no matter the distance or the challenges involved.

Read More at RVM News

Big Government

Biden’s FEMA Fails Again: 26 Families Promised Homes, Only 3 Get Them, It Gets Even Worse

Hurricane Helene made landfall in September, leaving widespread damage across the southern United States, particularly in North Carolina.

In the aftermath of the storm, residents in the state were left to pick up the pieces, only to find themselves grappling with delays in receiving much-needed federal aid.

This failure by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) marked one of the lowest points for Joe Biden’s administration, as the agency’s inability to effectively respond to the crisis in the Tar Heel State became a glaring example of government incompetence.

According to a report from WLOS ABC News, a top FEMA official had promised to help 26 families in Black Mountain, North Carolina, secure mobile homes by Christmas.

However, by the time of the update, only three families had been successfully placed in trailers.

The slow pace of progress raised concerns among local residents and officials, who criticized FEMA’s sluggish response to an urgent situation.

FEMA’s performance in North Carolina, particularly in regard to placing families in mobile homes, exemplifies the agency’s ongoing struggles.

The delay in providing timely and adequate assistance to families affected by the storm has led to frustration and disappointment.

For many, the promise of mobile home placements by Christmas now seems like an unattainable goal, with limited progress to show for the months that have passed since the storm.

In addition to the hardships faced by families, farmers in the region are still dealing with the aftermath of the storm’s destruction.

The damage to crops and infrastructure has made it difficult for many to recover, and the long-term impact on the agricultural community continues to be felt across the state.

The failure of FEMA to effectively assist those impacted by Hurricane Helene has become a symbol of broader challenges within the Biden-Harris administration.

Critics point to the agency’s inability to deliver prompt and sufficient aid as indicative of larger systemic issues, particularly in terms of disaster response and recovery efforts.

As residents and officials continue to await the aid they were promised, the situation in North Carolina remains dire.

With only three families placed in trailers out of the 26 promised, the recovery process seems to be moving at a glacial pace.

Read More at RVM News

crime

Food Fight: Chipotle Employee Attacked in Viral Incident

A violent altercation unfolded at a Chipotle restaurant in Brentwood, Washington, DC, on Saturday when a customer allegedly assaulted an employee over a dispute involving her Uber Eats order.

The incident, partially captured on video and widely shared on social media, has left the employee shaken and raised concerns about workplace safety.

The video, initially posted to X (formerly Twitter), shows the customer, carrying an empty bowl, pushing her way behind the counter.

She proceeds to scoop food into her bowl while employees attempt to stop her.

Roberto Hernandez, a Chipotle worker involved in the altercation, tried to retrieve the bowl, but the situation escalated.

As Hernandez reached for the bowl, the customer pulled it away and slapped him in the face, causing food to scatter across the workstation. “I was mad, upset. But I’m a man, you know I can’t hit a female,” Hernandez told WUSA9, explaining why he walked away from the confrontation.

Hernandez said the conflict began when the customer claimed her Uber Eats order was incorrect.

According to her, the burrito bowl she received did not include the double meat she had requested.

She demanded a refund, but Hernandez and his manager explained that refunds for third-party delivery orders must be handled through Uber Eats.

“I checked the receipt, and it showed she didn’t order double meat,” Hernandez stated.

However, the customer, dissatisfied with their response, took matters into her own hands by going behind the counter to assemble a new order.

The situation became more alarming when Hernandez revealed that the customer allegedly threatened staff after the incident. “Yesterday, she was saying, ‘I’m going to come back and stab them and take their life,’” Hernandez told the outlet, adding that the threats left him and his coworkers fearful.

The unidentified customer, however, disputed the claims, alleging that employees had put their hands on her first.

She told WUSA9, “I wasn’t aggressive toward them until I got assaulted. The video was cut short.” She also claimed that she only “threw” the bowl at the worker and not more.

In response, Chipotle filed a police report, and the customer has stated her intent to sue the restaurant chain.

Read More at Red Voice Media


Scroll to Top