Author name: Red Voice Media

MSNBC’s Joy Reid is at it again. During a recent episode of The ReidOut, Reid compared Republican ads from the 2024 election cycle to propaganda tactics employed by the Nazis during World War II, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

This jaw-dropping statement highlights how detached Reid—and by extension, MSNBC—has become from the concerns of everyday Americans.

It’s hardly surprising that rumors suggest MSNBC’s president may soon step down. After all, the network continues to sink deeper into irrelevance. With commentary like this, it’s no wonder viewership has dwindled.

The network’s inability to connect with its audience is a self-inflicted wound, as evidenced by Reid’s rant.

During her segment, Reid lamented Tennessee’s law banning “gender-affirming care” for minors, a case currently before the Supreme Court. She claimed the law reflects an “age-old tradition” of targeting transgender individuals, likening it to Nazi Germany’s atrocities in the 1930s.

She didn’t stop there. Reid also criticized Republicans for spending $215 million on so-called “anti-trans” ads, including prominent spots from the Trump campaign, and accused them of exploiting Americans’ “fear of the transgender community.”

Parents have expressed genuine concerns about ideologies influencing their children through schools, entertainment, and government. The recent election results reflect a clear stance from Americans, signaling opposition to policies they believe overstep boundaries regarding cultural and social issues.

Yet, Reid and her liberal allies refuse to grasp this reality.

She also attempted a wildly misplaced comparison, claiming more children are exposed to gun violence (an estimated three million) than there are transgender Americans of all ages.

According to Reid, this makes the GOP’s focus on trans issues not only misguided but somehow akin to Nazi-era policies. While one might expect inflammatory rhetoric from Reid, invoking the horrors of the Holocaust to score political points is a new low, even for her.

This nonsense underscores why many Americans are tuning out MSNBC altogether. People are tired of being lectured by pundits who view them as backward for rejecting extreme ideologies.

The ads resonated because they addressed real parental concerns, not because they incited baseless fear.

MSNBC may need to reevaluate its programming as some viewers express frustration with divisive commentary. The network risks further alienating its viewership without adjustments to address audience concerns.

Read More at RVM News

Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman couldn’t resist poking fun at Florida Governor Ron DeSantis after reports surfaced that President-elect Donald Trump is considering DeSantis as a potential pick for Secretary of Defense.

The buzz comes amid claims that Trump’s team might ditch their earlier choice, former Fox News host Pete Hegseth, due to hurdles in securing his Senate confirmation. According to the Wall Street Journal, Trump casually floated DeSantis’ name during a recent chat at Mar-a-Lago, as reported by MSN.

Taking to X (formerly Twitter), Fetterman weighed in with his signature mix of humor and snark. “I’ll consider a YES on him if he finally admits to his boots with 4″ lifts,” the senator quipped, referring to a popular internet conspiracy about DeSantis allegedly wearing height-boosting insoles.

The online theory, which gained traction during DeSantis’ brief presidential bid, scrutinized the peculiar shape of his boots. Social media sleuths speculated that the governor might have used lifts to appear taller—a potential edge when standing next to Trump, who towers at 6’3”.

Fetterman’s jab resonated with many of his followers, who reveled in the lighthearted commentary.

The speculation surrounding Trump’s Cabinet picks remains a hot topic, but the spotlight on DeSantis comes with an extra dose of drama. If nominated, DeSantis would have to navigate a confirmation process that could expose both allies and detractors within the Senate. Meanwhile, Fetterman’s playful post ensures the online conversation keeps buzzing.

Read More at RVM News

Vivek Ramaswamy announced a temporary pause of his weekly “Truth” podcast as he shifts his focus to a new collaborative project with Elon Musk.

The initiative, described as a series of “Doge casts,” aims to provide unprecedented transparency into government waste, fraud, and abuse while actively working to address these issues.

Ramaswamy shared the news in a statement, expressing his gratitude to listeners for their support throughout the podcast’s run. “As part of that process, I’m now all in. I’m focused on making sure that we actually accomplish the goal, rather than just talking about it. So to that end, for the next little bit, I’m going to put a pause on the weekly truth podcasts,” he said.

Ramaswamy reflected on the experience of hosting the podcast and the insights he gained along the way. “I’ve enjoyed doing it this year. It’s been incredibly fun and entertaining. I’ve learned from a lot of the guests, and I’ve enjoyed communicating with all of you. We’re going to put that on pause for a little bit,” he added.

The upcoming Doge casts will be a key part of the joint effort between Ramaswamy and Musk, aiming to shed light on the inefficiencies and corruption within government operations. “As you may have heard, Elon and I are going to start a separate track of Doge casts that explain exactly what we’re doing to the public to provide transparency,” Ramaswamy said.

Describing the project as “once in a generation,” Ramaswamy emphasized the importance of bringing the public along in their mission. “We want to bring the public along with us, to lift the curtain, to take us behind the scenes of what actually that waste, fraud, and abuse in government looks like. However bad you think it is, it’s probably worse,” he stated.

Ramaswamy also stressed the proactive nature of the initiative. “But we don’t want to do this to just expose the problem. We want to do it to solve the problem,” he said, underscoring their commitment to actionable solutions.

The first details about the Doge casts will be announced soon, according to Ramaswamy, who acknowledged the urgency of their mission as the January 20 transition date approaches. “We are neck deep right now and transitioning to the new dawn on January 20,” he said.

Ramaswamy concluded with gratitude and optimism, thanking his audience for their engagement with the podcast. “I thank all of you for your journey this year, for joining us. I’ve loved doing the truth, and we’re just going to put it on pause for a little bit to hopefully embark on this new chapter of saving our republic,” he stated. “Stay tuned for further details, and we’ll be in touch.”

Read More at RVM News

President-elect Donald Trump has filed a groundbreaking $10 billion lawsuit against several prominent media organizations, including The New York Times and CBS, alleging defamation and intentional dissemination of false information during the 2024 presidential election.

The lawsuit, revealed late Friday, has sparked intense debate across political and media circles.

According to a statement from Trump’s legal team, the lawsuit accuses the media outlets of publishing and broadcasting “knowingly false and defamatory statements” designed to harm Trump’s re-election campaign and tarnish his reputation.

The complaint further claims that these actions represented a coordinated effort to mislead voters and influence the election outcome.

The lawsuit seeks $10 billion in damages, a figure that, if awarded, would represent one of the largest defamation claims in U.S. legal history.

Trump’s legal team asserts that the media’s alleged misconduct caused irreparable harm to the President-elect’s standing and undermined the integrity of the electoral process.

The lawsuit explicitly names The New York Times and CBS as defendants, with Trump’s legal team indicating that additional media organizations could be added as the case progresses.

Sources close to Trump’s legal team suggest that internal communications, whistleblower testimonies, and other evidence have been gathered to substantiate the claims.

Legal and media experts are closely watching the case, which is expected to test the boundaries of First Amendment protections and defamation law.

Throughout his political career, Trump has maintained a contentious relationship with the press, frequently labeling critical coverage as “fake news.”

However, this lawsuit marks a significant escalation, transforming his long-standing grievances into a high-stakes legal confrontation.

Legal analysts note that defamation cases involving public figures are particularly challenging due to the high standard of proof required.

Trump’s legal team will need to demonstrate that the media outlets acted with “actual malice” by knowingly publishing false information or showing reckless disregard for the truth.

Trump’s supporters have embraced the lawsuit as a necessary move to hold the media accountable.

Read More at RVM News

Federal Election Commission (FEC) Chairman Sean Cooksey has publicly criticized the Department of Justice (DOJ), alleging that it violated federal policies by targeting Elon Musk’s pro-Trump political action committee (PAC) just weeks before the 2024 presidential election.

Cooksey accused the DOJ of attempting to “intimidate and chill private citizens and organizations from campaigning on behalf of President Trump” and urged DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz to launch an investigation into the matter.

In a letter sent Wednesday to Horowitz and the DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility, Cooksey expressed concerns over the DOJ’s actions, specifically a letter the department had issued to Musk’s political committee, America PAC.

The DOJ letter, first reported by The New York Times, warned that a $1 million giveaway Musk’s PAC offered to individuals signing a petition supporting constitutional freedom could potentially violate federal election laws.

Cooksey’s letter to Horowitz marks the FEC’s official response, and he argued that the DOJ’s actions were intended to sway the election outcome by targeting perceived political opponents.

Cooksey called on the DOJ to “hold accountable any individuals responsible for any violations of federal law or department policies.”

The FEC chairman also likened the DOJ’s warning letter to past politically charged actions, comparing it specifically to the Watergate scandal of 1972. “The underlying motivation behind this stunt is obvious,” Cooksey said. “Employees of President Biden’s Department of Justice wanted to stop an independent political committee from campaigning for President Trump in crucial swing states just prior to election day.”

The DOJ’s letter to Musk’s America PAC raised questions about whether the $1 million incentive could be seen as improperly influencing voter actions, despite Musk’s defense that participants were not required to register as Republicans or vote in the November 5 election.

Nevertheless, the DOJ’s letter quickly gained media attention, with some Democratic figures criticizing Musk’s actions as undermining democratic processes.

Cooksey also alleged that the DOJ’s Public Integrity Section had violated the department’s own policies by leaking the letter to The New York Times.

According to Cooksey, this move contravened established DOJ media guidelines, which discourage public disclosures regarding uncharged individuals or prejudicial information in ongoing matters. “Writing such a letter and then leaking it also violates the department’s long-standing policy against the identification of uncharged parties and the disclosure of prejudicial information,” Cooksey stated.

Cooksey’s comments reflect an ongoing tension between Musk and certain political and governmental figures. Musk, a longtime supporter of Democratic candidates, notably endorsed Trump after an assassination attempt on the president-elect in July.

Following the endorsement, Trump named Musk and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy to co-lead the newly created Department of Government Efficiency, part of Trump’s incoming administration.

President-elect Trump praised Musk and Ramaswamy, stating, “Together, these two wonderful Americans will pave the way for my Administration to dismantle Government Bureaucracy, slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure Federal Agencies – Essential to the ‘Save America’ Movement.”

The FEC’s criticism of the DOJ is expected to draw attention to questions about the department’s role in political processes and its handling of election-related activities.

With investigations potentially on the horizon, the episode underscores ongoing scrutiny over governmental transparency and accountability as the Trump administration prepares for its next term.

Read More at RVM News

Kamala Harris, America’s political shape-shifter, has yet again flipped her stance on immigration in a bid to drum up last-minute support.

Known for her shifting positions on key issues, Harris recently unveiled her latest policy reversal during a speech in Washington, where she promised to deport illegal immigrants—a position far removed from her previous pro-open-borders stance, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

Standing on the Ellipse, Harris aimed her critique squarely at Donald Trump, announcing her commitment to deporting individuals who cross the border illegally and bolstering border security—a surprising claim considering her well-documented support for sanctuary policies.

As she took the stage, Harris declared, “Politicians have got to stop treating immigration as an issue to scare up votes in an election and instead treat it as the serious challenge that it is.”

With sweeping promises, she pledged to “remove those who arrive here unlawfully” and support Border Patrol efforts—conveniently leaving out her past advocacy for policies that would do precisely the opposite.

Consider Harris’s prior statements: She once claimed she didn’t support decriminalizing illegal border crossings. Yet, footage shows Harris publicly raising her hand in favor, even declaring, “We’re not going to treat people who are undocumented [who] cross the borders as criminals.”

Harris has previously dismissed illegal immigration as a “non-emergency” and has outright stated, “An undocumented immigrant is not a criminal.”

The list of contradictions doesn’t end there. Harris backed sanctuary laws, mass amnesty proposals, and taxpayer-funded healthcare for illegal immigrants—policies that are in stark contrast to her current, tough-on-border-crime rhetoric.

Read More at RVM News

Univision CEO Daniel Alegre is reshaping Hispanic media, highlighting that the days when Hispanic voters reliably supported Democrats are fading fast.

Speaking with Just the News, Alegre observed that Hispanics increasingly vote based on policies rather than political party lines—a seismic shift for both parties to reckon with.  “The world of 15 years ago, where Hispanics were essentially considered a vote for the Democratic Party, that’s no longer the case,” Alegre said, pointing to growing GOP support among Hispanic voters, especially men.

Alegre’s insights arrive amid Univision’s major transition, as the network pivots to a digital landscape and fosters direct conversations with Hispanic voters on topics that matter most.

This includes a recent Hispanic voter poll revealing strong alignment with GOP stances on top concerns: 26% of Hispanic respondents listed the economy as a primary issue, while 13% chose immigration and border security—both notably more significant than Vice President Kamala Harris’s preferred topics, climate change and abortion.

Looking at battleground states, Alegre noted that Hispanic voters are emerging as decisive in close elections. With this in mind, Univision commissioned a survey that echoed similar findings across conservative polls, revealing a dramatic 17-point surge in GOP support among Hispanic voters since the last election.

Alegre emphasized that this shift underscores a desire for consistent policy dialogue, with voters drawn to a party willing to address their economic and safety concerns.

In Univision’s latest moves, the network has opened more dialogue channels with both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris’s campaigns, a stark change from years past. Alegre hinted that only when politicians commit to ongoing engagement—not just at election time—will they resonate with the Hispanic community’s priorities.

Additionally, he noted that nearly 25% of Hispanic voters remain undecided, signaling a prime opportunity for politicians to secure votes if they consistently communicate on platforms and in languages that Hispanics trust.

Amid this political recalibration, Univision is also transforming internally. Longtime anchor Jorge Ramos’s retirement signals a new era, with Alegre overseeing Univision’s expansion into streaming and digital media.

He envisions a network that offers Hispanic audiences more interactivity and relevance, integrating personalized content and social engagement to meet the community’s dynamic needs.

A veteran from Google and Activision, Alegre’s approach combines traditional Hispanic values with tech-driven adaptability.

As Univision embraces this evolution, Alegre’s vision remains clear: keep Hispanic communities informed, connected, and empowered to make choices that best serve their families, not party allegiance.

With Hispanic voters poised to influence the election in key swing states, Univision’s evolving role in informing this pivotal group reflects the significance of their voices in shaping America’s future.

Read More at RVM News

An Aurora City Council member has revealed documents indicating that local police were aware of the presence and activities of the “Tren De Aragua” gang in the city over a year ago.

Councilwoman Danielle Jurinsky shared the documents, which include internal emails from the Aurora Police Department (APD), on her personal X (formerly Twitter) account on Wednesday and Thursday.

The documents discuss the extensive gang activity in the area, confirming that law enforcement had knowledge of the gang’s operations for some time.

In an interview with Fox News Digital, Jurinsky expressed her frustration with the city and state officials for allegedly downplaying the seriousness of the issue.

“I am done. I am tired of the city lying. I am done with the governor who called the cops on me. I am done with the local media.

This is an issue of human suffering. Gang members are extorting and torturing other migrants who came here for a better life and to get away from gangs like this,” Jurinsky told Fox News.

She went on to say that the Tren De Aragua (TdA) gang is still in control of certain apartment buildings in Aurora, despite authorities being aware of their presence.

Jurinsky referred to a document from October 2022 from APD’s Gang Intervention Unit, which noted that at least 15-20 members of TdA were operating in Denver and Aurora at the time.

The document also indicated that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had intelligence suggesting the gang planned to establish a headquarters in Aurora.

It listed two apartment buildings as central to the gang’s activities: The Edge at Lowry and Fitzsimons Place Apartments.

Jurinsky’s public release of the documents comes shortly after the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) recommended placing over 100 migrants believed to be affiliated with the gang on an FBI watchlist.

Read More at RVM News