Author name: Red Voice Media

Democrats

Kamala Harris Butchers Definition of Humility, Gets Lost in Her Own Speech Again

Kamala Harris delivered an extended and at times confusing answer on the concept of “humility” during a Sunday interview at the Australian Real Estate Conference (AREC), where she appeared as a guest speaker.

The session was hosted by real estate executive John McGrath, who described Harris as “humble” and asked what advice she might offer to professionals in his industry about staying grounded.

Image Credit: Phil Mistry – Shutterstock.com

Harris responded with a lengthy and abstract reflection on the idea of humility, during which she clarified, “I do not aspire to be humble” and “would not recommend it.”

“I think that one must be humble. But to aspire to be humble would be quite inauthentic … If one understands that, just, I mean, there’s so much that is magnificent and awe-inspiring about this world and its people,” Harris said.

“And when you take the moment to just listen to an individual’s story, whether it’s someone you’re sitting next to on the plane or standing in line with at the grocery store, there is so much about this world that we know and we don’t know. And that is very humbling.”

Harris continued, “To realize the dreams that people have, the struggles that they’ve overcome, and the magnificence of that. To realize the beauty of the human spirit, that we are by nature, I think, as a species, we don’t give up.”

“Part of the key to our survival is that we are adaptable,” she added.

“But we are also ambitious. I applaud ambition. I applaud ambition. I think it is a good thing to reach, but not without also understanding that in so doing, one must do the hard work. One must understand the context in which they exist. One must be respectful.”

The former vice president also referenced her upbringing as a formative influence on her view of humility, recalling how her mother was treated due to her race and accent.

“I grew up in an environment where my — whether it was my mother, who was … like I said, 5 feet tall, a brown woman with an accent — and I would see how she was treated sometimes,” Harris said.

“And I grew up then seeing, when I would see that — infrequently, though it happened — where there was some assumption that because of her appearance, she was not what she actually was. She was one of the most intelligent people you could meet.”

Harris said those experiences shaped her understanding of inequality.

“I realized how there is a certain level of unfairness in the world in terms of how people determine a hierarchy and then place others in that stratum,” she said.

“And I learned to dislike it immensely. And understand that I think it’s a flaw to exist in a way that one thinks they are superior to another based on some very arcane measure of the work of another.”

She concluded her remarks by saying, “And maybe it is that way of thinking that makes me have a certain level of humility.”

“It is because I see the strength and the value and the magnificence and the majesty of so many, regardless of what they do, where they live, and I’m humbled to be among them.”

Following her comments, McGrath replied, “Well said,” and the audience responded with extended applause.

Harris’s public speaking style has drawn scrutiny in the past. During her 2024 presidential campaign, political analysts and commentators raised concerns that her frequent use of ambiguous phrasing and complex, nonspecific language could undercut her public messaging.

Harris went on to lose the 2024 general election to President Donald Trump, falling short in all seven battleground states and the national popular vote. Trump gained support across several key voting blocs, including younger nonwhite voters.

Please visit Drew Berquist.com for more articles like this.

Democrats

The Exact Moment Kamala Harris Ditched Joe Biden in Her Campaign Revealed

During a September 2024 memorial event marking the 23rd anniversary of the September 11 attacks, Joe Biden was captured on video briefly wearing a red Trump campaign hat, a moment that reportedly marked the end of his joint public appearances with Vice President Kamala Harris ahead of the election.

The event took place in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, where Biden had been meeting with first responders.

During the visit, Biden engaged with a Trump supporter and, in what the White House at the time described as a “gesture of unity,” placed the Trump-branded cap on his head while speaking with the individual.

Footage from the event shows Biden interacting casually with the group before briefly wearing the red cap, which bore Donald Trump’s campaign branding.

While the White House downplayed the moment as a bipartisan gesture, new details published in the book Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again suggest the episode caused internal tension within the administration—particularly with Vice President Kamala Harris.

According to the book, Harris was deeply frustrated by the incident. Upon seeing the footage of Biden wearing the hat, she reportedly turned to her team and asked, “What is he doing?”

She continued, “This is completely unhelpful. And so unnecessary.”

The book asserts that this moment was the final time Harris appeared alongside Biden at a public event before the 2024 election.

The Trump campaign quickly seized on the incident, circulating the footage and mocking the optics of the moment.

“Kamala did so bad in last night’s debate, Joe Biden just put on a Trump hat,” the campaign posted on social media.

Another post from the campaign added, “Thanks for the support, Joe!”

The 9/11 memorial in Shanksville was one of several high-profile appearances Biden made in September 2024, as public scrutiny over his cognitive and physical fitness intensified following a series of on-camera stumbles and media reports questioning his capacity to continue his reelection campaign.

The event, meant to mark a solemn national anniversary, ended up becoming part of the broader political narrative surrounding the campaign.

Original Sin, authored by CNN anchor Jake Tapper and Axios reporter Alex Thompson, has drawn attention for its detailed account of the Biden White House in the months leading up to the 2024 election.

The book highlights numerous behind-the-scenes incidents that reportedly contributed to internal disagreements among senior staff and campaign figures, with the 9/11 event cited as a flashpoint between Biden and Harris.

The White House has not publicly responded to the new claims made in the book.

As of now, there has been no official comment from either Harris or Biden’s post-presidency office on the reported fallout from the event.

Please visit RVM News for more stories like this.

Cancel Culture

SPLC Brands Charlie Kirk’s TPUSA a Hate Group, Kirk Issues a Scorching Response

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has added Turning Point USA (TPUSA) and PragerU to its annual “hate map,” listing both conservative organizations under the category of “anti-government extremist groups.”

This marks the first time TPUSA, a prominent conservative youth organization, has been included on the SPLC’s controversial list.

The SPLC’s updated Year in Hate and Extremism report was released Thursday, documenting 1,371 so-called “hate and extremist groups” across the United States in 2024, down from 1,430 the previous year.

The SPLC’s entry for TPUSA alleges the group “sows and exploits fear that white Christian supremacy is under attack by nefarious actors, including immigrants, the LGBTQ+ community and civil rights activists.”

The report continues, stating that “TPUSA and its spokespeople often warn their audience that their children, wives, religion, way of life and they themselves are under attack by various constructed enemies.”

It further accuses TPUSA of “exploit[ing] complicated feelings of insecurity and anxiety to manufacture rage and mobilize support to revive and maintain a white-dominated, male supremacist, Christian social order.”

Turning Point USA, founded by Charlie Kirk in 2012, is widely known for its presence on college campuses and its advocacy for limited government, free markets, and American constitutional principles.

The group has held major student leadership conferences and worked with numerous conservative figures and elected officials.

Charlie Kirk responds:

“Being on their list is a badge of honor. It means they’re terrified that we’re so effective. Keep crying, SPLC—America’s done with your scam.”

Also listed in the SPLC’s 2024 report is PragerU, a nonprofit that produces educational videos and digital content from a conservative perspective.

PragerU was founded by conservative commentator Dennis Prager and has gained widespread attention through its short-form videos on history, economics, religion, and politics.

Like TPUSA, this is the first time PragerU has appeared on the SPLC’s “hate map.”

The SPLC’s new classification of these groups follows similar designations in recent years.

The organization previously listed Moms for Liberty, a parental rights group, under the same category, sparking backlash from parents and education advocates across the country.

Although the SPLC was originally established to fight legal battles against violent racist organizations, including the Ku Klux Klan, its critics argue that it has since shifted into a partisan advocacy group, targeting conservative and religious organizations under vague or politically motivated labels.

Despite the controversy, SPLC data continues to be cited by media outlets and researchers.

The Guardian, which reported on the SPLC’s new findings, noted that the total number of groups identified by the organization has decreased.

According to the outlet, this is due in part to what the SPLC believes is a mainstreaming of certain ideologies, which it says are now more embedded in politics, education, and broader society.

“The 5% drop in hate and extremist groups in 2024 can be attributed to the fact that many feel a lesser sense of urgency to organize, because their beliefs have infiltrated politics, education and society in general,” the SPLC report claims.

The SPLC’s updated map and report are already drawing reactions from conservative organizations and public commentators, who argue the group continues to conflate political disagreement with extremism in order to maintain influence and visibility.

Please visit RVM News for more stories like this.

Illegal Immigration

Tom Homan Slams Rep. McIver After ICE Assault, Demands More Deportations

Image Credit: © Alex Gould/The Republic / USA TODAY NETWORK

White House Border Czar Tom Homan criticized Democratic Rep. LaMonica McIver on Tuesday following her indictment for assaulting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents during an incident at the Delaney Hall Detention Center in Newark, New Jersey.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, the confrontation took place earlier this month and involved McIver and fellow Democratic Representatives Bonnie Watson Coleman and Rob Menendez Jr., along with Newark Mayor Ras Baraka.

Newark Mayor Ras Baraka speaks to a crowd gathered in opposition to ICE on Tuesday, Mar. 11, 2025, after ICE released a statement last week announcing the opening of Delaney Hall in Newark, NJ as a detention center.

The group forced their way into the ICE facility in an attempt to stop the detention of individuals suspected of being in the country illegally. Baraka was arrested during the incident.

Footage from the scene shows McIver in a red outfit repeatedly pushing and striking federal officers during the encounter. She was later charged with assaulting, impeding, and interfering with federal agents.

U.S. Attorney Alina Habba announced the indictment on Monday evening, stating, “No one is above the law — politicians or otherwise.”

McIver responded to the charges on Tuesday, calling them “purely political” and accusing ICE agents of escalating the situation. “They created an unnecessary and unsafe confrontation when they chose to arrest Mayor Baraka,” she said in a public statement.

Rep. Watson Coleman also responded to the incident by launching into a profanity-laced tirade, claiming the situation stemmed from racial bias. “Bullsh*t!” she said when asked why the group stormed the facility, also invoking accusations of “White supremacy.”

Homan condemned the lawmakers’ behavior and rhetoric. “It’s disgusting,” he said.

“While these people are sitting home at night and sleeping in their beds nice and comfortably, the men and women of ICE are on the street, putting their lives on the line to arrest public safety threats and national security threats. She should be thanking them for making her community safer, rather than attacking them.”

Homan also commented on the Supreme Court’s recent 8-1 decision to lift a lower court’s injunction blocking President Trump’s order to revoke Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for 350,000 Venezuelan nationals.

The decision gives federal authorities the green light to begin large-scale removals.

“We’re going to have more deportations,” Homan said. “If they don’t have any status to be in the country, that means they need to be deported.”

The administration has pledged to move forward with enforcement, citing national security concerns and the need to uphold immigration law.

Please visit RVM News for more stories like this.

Democrats

Triggered Dem Lawmaker Cries “White Supremacy” After Colleagues Stormed ICE Facility

Federal authorities are investigating a recent incident at the Delaney Hall Detention Center in Newark, New Jersey, where multiple Democratic lawmakers were involved in a confrontation with federal officers.

The Department of Justice has confirmed an active investigation into the matter, and a resolution to censure the lawmakers involved is currently being considered by members of Congress.

The confrontation occurred last week when several Democratic officials, including Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ), Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ), Rep. Robert Menendez Jr. (D-NJ), and Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, entered the detention center without following established protocols.

The facility is currently housing individuals who are in the country illegally.

Video footage from the scene shows Rep. McIver yelling at and physically engaging with law enforcement officers, including pushing and using her body to strike agents multiple times.

The altercation was captured on camera and circulated widely, prompting swift responses from lawmakers and law enforcement agencies.

Despite the footage, Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman denied that her colleague engaged in physical aggression, stating, “She didn’t touch them.”

She later amended her statement, adding, “She may have, like, pushed away to get them off of her, but she didn’t body slam anybody.”

Coleman dismissed the incident as exaggerated, saying, “It’s a bunch of crap that they would think that a member of Congress would do something like that.”

Rep. Coleman also claimed the group was denied lawful access to the facility, which she described as unacceptable.

When asked by reporters why the group forced its way inside and bypassed security protocols, she responded with a heated statement: “Bullsh*t!”

She continued, “Un-Americaning in an unamerican society with a unitarian government that abuses power on all levels and treats Congress members as if we are the enemy. You know who the enemy is? The enemy is the enemy of the people, and that’s the white supremacist that you’re talking about.”

Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested on Friday in connection with the incident. Charges stemming from the event are expected to be reviewed as the DOJ inquiry progresses.

In addition to the confrontation in Newark, Rep. Watson Coleman made headlines during a House hearing on Wednesday.

While questioning Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, she used her allotted time to accuse the Trump administration of “racist attacks” and launched into a racially charged tirade.

Kennedy remained composed during the hearing and responded only after Coleman’s time had expired.

Before an appropriations committee hearing on Thursday morning, a reporter confronted Rep. Watson Coleman for comment on the events.

She declined to expand on her previous remarks but reaffirmed her belief that McIver acted in self-defense and that the actions of law enforcement were inappropriate.

No timeline has been released by the Department of Justice regarding the conclusion of its investigation.

Meanwhile, the House continues to weigh disciplinary measures, including possible censure, for lawmakers involved in the unauthorized entry and physical altercation at the federal facility.

Please visit Drew Berquist.com for more stories like this.

Democrats

Hakeem Jeffries Struggles When Cornered on CNN About Joe Biden’s Mental Decline

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) was confronted during a CNN interview Wednesday over allegations that top Democrats worked to conceal Joe Biden’s cognitive decline during his final months in office.

Appearing on CNN’s The Situation Room, Jeffries was questioned by anchor Wolf Blitzer, who cited a recent incident involving Biden’s reported confusion at a campaign fundraiser hosted by actor and political activist George Clooney.

According to multiple accounts, Biden did not recognize Clooney at the event, raising further questions about his mental state during his presidency.

“Why should voters trust Democrats when it’s clear so many in your party went to great lengths to keep Biden’s condition hidden from the public?” Blitzer asked.

Jeffries deflected the question, stating, “I can’t tell you what happened between George Clooney and President Biden. I wasn’t at that event. What I can say is that we’re not looking back. We’re going to continue to look forward because at this moment we’ve got real problems that need to be addressed on behalf of the American people.”

Rather than address the specific concerns surrounding Biden’s cognitive state, Jeffries pivoted to accusing Republicans of targeting social safety nets.

“Americans are focused on Republicans snatching away health care, food assistance, and other things that hardworking people rely on,” he said.

Blitzer continued pressing the issue, asking Jeffries directly whether he noticed signs of decline in his interactions with Biden near the end of his presidency.

“You interacted with President Biden during those days, those final days he was president of the United States. Did you see, did you sense that there was a major deterioration?” Blitzer asked.

Jeffries responded by describing internal party discussions at the time.

“The conversations with President Biden during those final days surrounded what would be best for the party at that given moment in time,” Jeffries said.

“President Biden subsequently made the decision that he was going to pass the baton to Vice President Kamala Harris. Of course, that was a decision that we [Democrats] supported strongly.”

Blitzer then questioned whether Jeffries and other Democrat leaders should have intervened earlier as signs of Biden’s decline became more apparent.

“As you look back, you were in a leadership position when President Biden decided to run again. Should you have done more at that point to intervene?” Blitzer asked.

Jeffries again avoided a direct answer, shifting the focus to Democratic victories in special elections.

“The American people have consistently shown their trust in Democrats by rejecting MAGA extremism at the ballot box,” he said.

The interview has sparked renewed debate over the timeline and transparency surrounding Biden’s final year in office and the Democratic Party’s decision-making process during that period.

While Democratic leadership continues to rally behind Vice President Kamala Harris, questions remain over what party officials knew about Biden’s condition—and when.

No formal statements have been released from the White House or from former President Biden’s aides regarding the Clooney incident or Jeffries’ comments.

Please visit RVM News for more articles like this.

Media

“Can’t Hate the Media Enough”: Survey Shows Growing Bipartisan Hatred for Mainstream Media

A new national survey finds that a growing number of Americans, across party lines, believe media bias is not only real but getting worse—with nearly half of likely voters saying the problem has intensified in recent years.

The latest Rasmussen Reports survey, released this week, found that 49% of likely voters believe news media bias is getting worse, compared to just 11% who think it’s improving.

The findings reflect persistent skepticism among voters toward media institutions, which many say have increasingly favored Democratic perspectives.

In a key question from the survey, likely voters were asked if they agreed with the statement, “No matter how much you hate the media, it’s not enough.”

Forty-four percent agreed, compared to 29% who disagreed.

The results show that distrust of the press is not limited to one age group or political affiliation.

Respondents included younger voters, older Americans, Hispanics, Republicans, independents, and Democrats, many of whom cited a consistent pro-Democratic tilt in coverage across major news outlets.

When asked directly whether media organizations favor Democrats over Republicans, 43% of Democrats said yes, while 24% disagreed.

Among Republicans, agreement with the statement was even higher.

Overall, 57% of Republicans said they agreed that no amount of media hatred is too much, compared to 21% who disagreed.

Among Democrats, 40% agreed with the sentiment, while 35% disagreed.

Media bias has been a recurring topic in American politics, but it has taken on renewed significance in recent election cycles.

The issue escalated after President Donald Trump entered the political arena in 2015, regularly challenging coverage from mainstream outlets and referring to certain organizations as “fake news.”

Since then, multiple administrations have sought to circumvent traditional media gatekeepers.

Former President Barack Obama notably used social media and digital outreach to speak directly to voters, bypassing major networks.

The Trump administration expanded that approach by granting broader access to conservative and center-right outlets, challenging the legacy media’s dominance in the White House press pool.

Still, public concern about media bias has remained high.

According to the Rasmussen survey, a significant portion of the electorate believes traditional media sources have strayed too far from balanced reporting and editorial neutrality.

The survey reflects a broader trend of declining trust in journalism institutions.

Multiple studies over the last decade have shown a sharp drop in public confidence in major news outlets.

The growing skepticism has been particularly pronounced among independents and Republicans, though the latest data suggests even Democratic voters are increasingly critical of the media’s political leanings.

Rasmussen Reports did not release the full crosstabs or sample size breakdown publicly, but confirmed that the poll included a representative sample of likely U.S. voters.

As debate continues about how news is gathered, presented, and interpreted, the latest numbers underscore the challenge facing media organizations—one that now includes rebuilding trust across the political spectrum.

Please visit Drew Berquist.com for more articles like this.

News

Letitia Gets More Bad News as DOJ Launches Criminal Investigation

The Department of Justice has opened a criminal investigation into New York Attorney General Letitia James following a referral from a former federal housing official under the Trump administration, Fox News has confirmed.

A source familiar with the matter said a grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia has issued subpoenas related to allegations that James misrepresented a property in Virginia as her primary residence in order to obtain more favorable loan terms.

The probe is reportedly also examining a separate claim that James inaccurately listed the number of livable units in a Brooklyn property, allegedly to secure another favorable loan.

The criminal referral was made by William Pulte, then-Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, who requested that the Justice Department investigate both incidents.

According to Pulte, James claimed a single-family residence in Virginia was her primary home despite serving in public office in New York.

In the second case, she allegedly overstated the number of livable units in a multifamily property located in Brooklyn.

James’ attorney, Abbe Lowell, responded to the investigation in a statement Thursday, characterizing the claims as politically motivated and previously addressed.

“These baseless and long-discredited allegations, put to rest by my April 24 letter to the Department of Justice, are suddenly back in the news just days after President Trump publicly attacked Attorney General James,” Lowell said.

Lowell further stated, “This appears to be the political retribution President Trump threatened to exact that AG Bondi assured the Senate would not occur on her watch. If prosecutors are genuinely interested in the truth, we are prepared to meet false claims with facts.”

Following the referral, Lowell sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and the DOJ, accusing President Trump of leveraging the Justice Department for political retaliation.

In the letter, Lowell cited past statements by the president targeting James and referenced public calls for accountability.

James has been a prominent legal adversary of President Trump, participating in multiple lawsuits against his administration during his first term in office.

Most notably, she led the civil case against Trump and the Trump Organization, alleging they falsified business records to receive favorable loan terms.

A judge ultimately ordered Trump to pay hundreds of millions of dollars in penalties, although the ruling is currently under appeal.

In his letter, Lowell argued that Trump’s prior claims about a politicized Justice Department are contradicted by the current investigation.

“The stunning hypocrisy of President Trump’s complaint that the Justice Department had been ‘politicized’ and ‘weaponized’ against him is laid bare as he and others in his administration are now asking you to undertake the very same practice,” he wrote.

Lowell also addressed the specific allegations in detail.

Regarding the Virginia property, he acknowledged that James signed a power-of-attorney document suggesting the home was to be used as a primary residence, but claimed this was an error.

He added that other lender documents made clear the home was not intended to be James’ primary residence.

As for the Brooklyn property, James is accused of inflating the number of livable units to receive lower loan rates.

Lowell argued that Pulte ignored more recent documentation that listed the residence as a four-unit multifamily dwelling, instead focusing on a certificate of occupancy dated from 2001.

Please visit RVM News for more stories like this.

Democrats

Sen. Hawley Finds it “Hilarious” Dems Act as if They Have “No Idea” How Country Got So Bad

Senator Josh Hawley, R-Mo., criticized Joe Biden and his administration during an appearance on Fox News Wednesday night, holding Democrats responsible for the nation’s economic challenges, the border crisis, and what he described as a diminished global standing.

The senator appeared on “Hannity” to respond to comments made by Biden during a recent interview with the BBC, in which the former president defended his economic record and dismissed President Donald Trump’s administration as lacking meaningful accomplishments.

Biden claimed his policies strengthened both the economy and America’s role in global leadership.

Sen. Hawley pushed back strongly against that characterization, pointing to inflation, border security failures, and federal spending as evidence that Democratic leadership had caused significant harm.

“He doesn’t have a solution, which is why he’s out of office,” Hawley said of Biden.

“But here’s the thing that I think is so hilarious — Joe Biden and Buttigieg and all the rest, they now act like they have no idea how the country got into this state.”

Hawley noted that inflation and rising consumer costs were the direct result of the Biden-Harris administration’s economic policies, including large-scale spending and changes to domestic energy production.

“I mean, my gosh, inflation is really high. Gee, how did that happen? I don’t know. Maybe it’s because Joe Biden shut down American energy production, spent three, four trillion dollars on Green New Deal giveaways,” Hawley said.

Turning to border security, the Missouri senator criticized the administration’s enforcement policies and described the situation as a crisis that had been created by the White House.

“Buttigieg acts like ‘How did the border get to be such a problem?’ I don’t know. Maybe because Joe Biden opened it up and let every criminal and gang member come across the border. Donald Trump closed it in like two weeks flat,” he said.

Hawley further argued that Democratic officials are increasingly disconnected from the concerns of average Americans.

“These people live on a different planet, Sean. They’re totally out of touch with reality,” he said.

“Donald Trump is turning the country around in 100 short days, and that’s why they’re desperate. The Democrats are totally desperate.”

He criticized Biden and other Democratic leaders for prioritizing international appearances over addressing pressing domestic issues.

“They’re jetting around now to foreign countries to hold hands with terrorists. This is what they think is important,” Hawley stated.

Biden’s term in office faced significant economic pressures, including a 40-year high in inflation that peaked at 9.1% in June 2022, straining household budgets across the country.

His administration also faced criticism over energy policy changes, including reduced domestic oil and gas production in favor of expanding renewable energy funding.

Meanwhile, border enforcement became a growing issue, with U.S. authorities recording approximately 8.5 million migrant encounters at the southern border over the course of the Biden-Harris administration.

Republicans have pointed to these figures as evidence of policy failure and have advocated for renewed enforcement measures.

As the debate continues over the direction of U.S. policy, Hawley and other GOP lawmakers continue to draw a contrast between Biden’s record and the policies implemented by President Trump since returning to office.

Please visit Drew Berquist for more articles like this.

Illegal Immigration

Joe Biden Fudged the Numbers—Trump’s Deportation Machine Sets the Record Straight

President Donald Trump’s administration is reporting a sharp rise in immigration enforcement actions during its first 100 days in office, outpacing the Biden-Harris administration’s real deportation numbers by a wide margin once misclassified data is accounted for.

Officials are also pointing to a significant decline in illegal border crossings and a surge in self-deportations as a result of renewed enforcement.

Image Credit: Ruben2533 – Shutterstock.com

According to new data released by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Trump’s administration has removed 65,682 illegal aliens and arrested 66,463 since January.

The rate of deportations now stands at approximately 660 per day—five times higher than the adjusted rate under the Biden-Harris administration, which had included “turnarounds” at the border in its deportation statistics.

A detailed analysis shows that over 80% of the 271,484 deportations claimed by the Biden administration in fiscal year 2024 were not ICE removals from the interior but were instead apprehensions by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) at the southern border.

These border turnbacks—classified as “returns” or “expulsions” by CBP—are not counted as deportations under standard ICE practice.

Image Credit: Fishman64 – Shutterstock.com

A December 2024 press release from CBP under the Biden administration referred to these actions as “removals and returns,” effectively inflating the deportation statistics. In contrast, ICE under Trump has reported only official interior removals, not including border turnarounds.

When recalculated, Biden’s true ICE removal rate falls to around 130 per day, compared to Trump’s 660 daily removals. Homeland Security reports that more than 142,000 deportations and 158,000 arrests have been made across all enforcement agencies in Trump’s first 100 days.

Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons said in a statement Tuesday:

“We removed over 65,000 illegal aliens to countries across the world. We’re just 100 days into this administration and thanks to President Trump and Secretary Noem, ICE is using every tool at its disposal to enforce our country’s immigration laws and protect our communities.”

Homeland Security Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin said the early success reflects the administration’s aggressive approach after years of limited enforcement.

“President Trump and Secretary Noem have jump-started an agency that was vilified and barred from doing its job for the last four years.”

She added that illegal migrants are now turning back before reaching the U.S., and use of the CBP Home app for self-deportation is surging. Migration through Panama’s Darien Gap is reportedly down 99.99%.

White House Border Czar Tom Homan credited the current enforcement pace to policy changes but urged Congress to allocate more resources.

“Congress needs to get off their ass. Give us the money we need… We need money for more beds, for transportation, for more officers. We’ve got over 700,000 illegal aliens with criminal convictions walking the streets of America.”

The administration has also reinstated the Remain in Mexico policy, requiring asylum applicants to wait outside the U.S. until their court dates—reversing Biden’s “catch and release” policy.

Under Biden, millions were released into the country with court dates or parole. The Center for Immigration Studies estimates at least 160,000 aliens skipped their court dates in FY 2023.

Image Credit:Philip Yabut – Shutterstock.com

Upon taking office in January, President Trump signed an executive order directing that illegal aliens apprehended inside the country be detained. ICE officials now report that roughly three in four of those arrested under Trump have prior criminal convictions.

Additionally, Fox News correspondent Bill Melugin reported that approximately 9,000 illegal aliens have self-deported using the CBP Home app, a tool initially developed during Biden’s term.

While Homeland Security has not confirmed the exact figure, officials acknowledged that “thousands” have used the app to leave voluntarily.

In an address at the Border Security Expo in Phoenix last month, Homan stated, “I’m happy with the numbers, but I’m not satisfied. We need more, and that’s where the budget comes in.”

Phoenix, Arizona – December 22, 2024: President Trumps appointed border czar, Tom Homan at AmericaFest.

On Friday, the Office of Management and Budget submitted its request to Congress for the upcoming budget reconciliation.

The proposal includes $175 million in new funding for Homeland Security to “fully secure the border” and a 13% increase in defense spending, offset by reductions in education, foreign aid, environmental, and welfare programs.

Visit RVM News for more articles like this.


Scroll to Top