Author name: Red Voice Media

Sports

Elon Musk Reportedly Considering Purchase of $5 Billion England Soccer Club

Tech billionaire Elon Musk, known for his ventures in technology and space exploration, as well as his influence in politics, may now be setting his sights on the world of sports.

Reports suggest Musk is considering purchasing Liverpool FC, one of the most storied soccer clubs in the English Premier League. Liverpool FC, nicknamed “The Reds,” is one of the most successful teams in English soccer history. The club has amassed 19 league titles, eight FA Cups, a record 10 League Cups, and 16 FA Community Shields.

On the international stage, Liverpool has won six European Cups, three UEFA Cups, four UEFA Super Cups—all English records—and one FIFA Club World Cup.

As of May 2024, Forbes valued Liverpool at $5.37 billion, ranking it as the fourth most valuable football team in the world.

The club’s prestige and financial standing make it an attractive prospect for potential buyers. Errol Musk, Elon’s father, confirmed his son’s interest in Liverpool during an interview with Times Radio. “Oh yes, but that doesn’t mean he’s buying it,” Errol Musk said. “He would like to, yes, obviously, anybody would want to. So would I.”

However, he added, “I can’t comment on that. They’ll raise the price.”

Errol Musk also shared that the family has connections to Liverpool. “We have relatives in Liverpool, and we were fortunate enough to know quite a few of the Beatles because they grew up with us—my family,” he said.

Despite the speculation, Fenway Sports Group (FSG), the current owners of Liverpool FC, has denied any plans to sell the club.

A spokesperson for the group told the Associated Press, “There is no truth to these rumors.”

In September 2023, FSG sold a minority stake in Liverpool to U.S. investment firm Dynasty Equity.

At that time, FSG president Mike Gordon reaffirmed the group’s commitment to the club. “Our long-term commitment to Liverpool remains as strong as ever,” Gordon said.

“We have always said that if there is an investment partner that is right for Liverpool, then we would pursue the opportunity to help ensure the club’s long-term financial resiliency and future growth.”

Musk has recently engaged in British political discourse, particularly following the center-left Labour Party’s victory in the July 2023 general election.

Through his social media platform, X (formerly Twitter), Musk has called for a new election, raising his profile in UK political matters.

While the rumors surrounding Musk’s interest in Liverpool FC have been denied by the club’s current owners, his reputation for bold and unexpected ventures keeps the possibility alive.

Whether Musk’s reported interest will lead to actual negotiations remains to be seen, but the speculation has already sparked discussions in both the sports and business worlds.

Read More at Red Voice Media

Left-wing extremism

ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith Goes Off on the Left’s Continued Lawfare Against Trump

ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith expressed sharp criticism regarding Judge Juan Merchan’s decision to schedule President-elect Donald Trump’s sentencing just days before his January 20 inauguration.

The sentencing, set for January 10, comes after Trump was convicted in May on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to a nondisclosure agreement with adult film actress Stormy Daniels.

On “The Stephen A. Smith Show,” Smith questioned the purpose of the sentencing, suggesting it served no practical purpose other than to tarnish Trump’s reputation. “This is the kind of stuff that just validates assertions about stuff being politicized,” Smith said.

“Maybe not specifically with Trump, but the suspicion definitely is there. What is the purpose of this? Is he going to jail? Are you going to give a fine? We got to sit up there and go through all the pomp and circumstance when you know you’re not going to do anything.”

Smith criticized Judge Merchan, noting that the case’s substance and timing seemed politically charged. “He was certified today as the next president of the United States of America. Come January 21st, he will be sworn in as the 47th president of the United States of America. But … you want to sentence him,” Smith said. “You’re Juan Merchan — who is he, the state Supreme Court justice in New York? You want to sentence him next Friday? And by the way, what is the sentencing about?”

The charges stem from allegations that Trump falsified business records to conceal payments made to Daniels during his 2016 presidential campaign.

Smith questioned the gravity of the case, comparing it to non-disclosure agreements commonly used in business and legal contexts. “Thirty-four felony counts … sounds very, very damaging. It’s a hush-money case,” Smith said.

“Essentially, the case against Donald Trump is that he is alleged to have engaged in relations with a former porn star and he made efforts involving finances to keep her mouth shut. That’s what all of this is about?”

Smith also took aim at Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who opposed Trump’s motion to dismiss the case and suggested Judge Merchan could use an abatement mechanism, typically applied when a defendant dies between conviction and sentencing.

“Why? That’s going to validate everything for you? Did you get him? Did you put him in jail? Did you prevent him from winning the election? No, you did not,” Smith said. “So now all you’re doing is further impugning the name of the president-elect, soon to be the 47th president of the United States.”

Smith emphasized that the sentencing would not include jail time, nor would it prevent Trump from taking office, signing laws, or fulfilling his duties as president.

He also referenced Trump’s recent political influence, including his role in securing Republican Mike Johnson’s election as Speaker of the House. Smith’s remarks highlight ongoing debates about the intersection of law and politics in high-profile cases. Trump’s legal team has consistently argued that the charges against him are politically motivated, while his supporters view the case as part of a broader effort to undermine his presidency and political career.

As Trump prepares to take office as the 47th president, the January 10 sentencing is likely to reignite discussions about the fairness and motivations behind the legal proceedings.

For now, Smith’s criticism reflects a growing skepticism among many Americans about the politicization of the legal system.

Read More at Red Voice Media

Big Government

New House Report: FBI, Secret Service Botched Investigation of January 6 Pipe Bombs

A House investigation has uncovered multiple security failures by federal law enforcement agencies following the discovery of live explosive devices placed near both Republican and Democratic headquarters in Washington, D.C., on January 6, 2021.

Two Republican-led subcommittees released an 81-page report Thursday, detailing what they described as “egregious safety and security failures” by the U.S. Capitol Police and the Secret Service that put Kamala Harris, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and several civilians at risk.

The investigation, led by Representatives Barry Loudermilk (R-AL) and Thomas Massie (R-KY), also revealed shortcomings in the FBI’s early efforts to track down the suspect responsible for planting the bombs.

Despite an extensive investigation, the FBI was unable to identify the suspect, and the case stalled after two months due to a lack of credible leads.

According to the report, the suspect, seen on surveillance footage wearing a hooded sweatshirt and face covering, planted two pipe bombs on the night before the scheduled certification of the 2020 election results at the U.S. Capitol.

As of the release of the report, the suspect remains at large, and the FBI is still offering a $500,000 reward for information leading to an arrest.

The bombs, which were described as “viable” by the FBI, remained in place for more than 16 hours. They were equipped with 60-minute timers.

The first bomb was discovered by a woman walking to an alley to do laundry around noon on January 6, near the Republican National Committee (RNC) headquarters.

A subsequent search led to the discovery of a second bomb outside the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters while Vice President Harris was inside the building.

The report outlined the failure of the Secret Service to identify the bomb outside the DNC despite conducting a security sweep in preparation for Harris’s arrival.

The report said, “Prior to Vice President-elect Harris’s 11:25 AM arrival, at least ten different USSS agents and two canine units came within feet of the pipe bomb yet never discovered the device.”

One agent reportedly spent five hours near the garage entrance without discovering the bomb.

Additionally, the report revealed that former Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s motorcade came “within feet” of the pipe bomb.

One person of interest had searched for “pipe bomb DC” on the internet, while another had recently purchased shoes similar to those worn by the suspect seen in the surveillance footage.

The FBI initially worked aggressively to follow leads, but the report states that by the end of February 2021, resources were diverted away from the case due to a lack of viable leads.

The discovery of the bombs, located a few blocks from the Capitol, came just as thousands of rioters breached the Capitol building.

Some conspiracy theories, amplified by figures such as former Rep. Matt Gaetz, suggested that law enforcement may have planted the bombs to distract police resources from the Capitol.

However, while the report did not provide evidence to support this theory, it did criticize the FBI for its vague description of the bombs as “viable,” noting that bomb technicians typically use more precise language to describe such devices.

“Traditionally, bomb technicians deliberately avoid using vague language, choosing instead to refer to a bomb as a ‘device’ if it would ‘function as designed’ or as a ‘hoax,’” the report stated. “In the case of the pipe bombs, it is unclear why the FBI insists on using a vague, non-standard description.”

The findings from the House investigation raise serious concerns about the adequacy of federal law enforcement’s response to the January 6th attacks and the threat posed by these explosive devices.

Despite the FBI’s efforts, the suspect remains unidentified, and key questions about the agency’s handling of the investigation continue to linger.

The report’s revelations about the lack of coordination and the failure to secure critical locations during a volatile time underscore the need for further scrutiny of how the federal government responds to such national security threats.

Read More at Red Voices Media

Uncategorized

Amish to the Rescue: 12 Homes Built in Less Than 48 Hours For NC Hurricane Victims

In response to the growing housing crisis, a surprising group of volunteers has come to the aid of the community in western North Carolina: Amish families from Central Pennsylvania.

According to the High Country Press, members of this Amish community became aware of the devastation through a local resident who had visited the area.

Motivated to help, they contacted Andy Owens, who had established a base camp in the Meat Camp Area of Watauga County.

Owens helped coordinate the logistics, while the Amish community provided the manpower, materials, and funding.

On December 17, 62 men, women, and children from the Amish community traveled by bus, bringing with them five trailers filled with supplies, tools, and building equipment.

The Amish, who generally avoid modern technology, made an exception for this project, recognizing the critical need for housing in the region.

Upon their arrival around noon, they immediately began working. By 5 p.m. that same day, eight housing structures had been completed.

While the men and boys worked on construction, the women and girls focused on providing food and distributing pallets of toys and clothing to those in need.

Within less than two days, the group had constructed 12 fully built housing structures, which only required minor finishing touches, such as electrical work.

In addition to the homes, the Amish also donated 20 propane tanks, tools, and five pallets of supplies for local fire department rescue workers.

The total cost of the project was estimated at around $300,000, all of which was furnished by the Amish community.

Traveling hundreds of miles and working tirelessly for two days, these volunteers provided much-needed homes for people they will likely never meet.

This story serves as a reminder that acts of kindness and service can come from unexpected places.

The Amish, who are often the subject of jokes and misunderstandings due to their refusal to embrace modern conveniences, have proven that their dedication to their faith and community can make a tangible difference in the lives of others.

Their efforts in western North Carolina are a testament to the power of selfless action and the importance of helping those in need, no matter the distance or the challenges involved.

Read More at RVM News

Big Government

Biden’s FEMA Fails Again: 26 Families Promised Homes, Only 3 Get Them, It Gets Even Worse

Hurricane Helene made landfall in September, leaving widespread damage across the southern United States, particularly in North Carolina.

In the aftermath of the storm, residents in the state were left to pick up the pieces, only to find themselves grappling with delays in receiving much-needed federal aid.

This failure by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) marked one of the lowest points for Joe Biden’s administration, as the agency’s inability to effectively respond to the crisis in the Tar Heel State became a glaring example of government incompetence.

According to a report from WLOS ABC News, a top FEMA official had promised to help 26 families in Black Mountain, North Carolina, secure mobile homes by Christmas.

However, by the time of the update, only three families had been successfully placed in trailers.

The slow pace of progress raised concerns among local residents and officials, who criticized FEMA’s sluggish response to an urgent situation.

FEMA’s performance in North Carolina, particularly in regard to placing families in mobile homes, exemplifies the agency’s ongoing struggles.

The delay in providing timely and adequate assistance to families affected by the storm has led to frustration and disappointment.

For many, the promise of mobile home placements by Christmas now seems like an unattainable goal, with limited progress to show for the months that have passed since the storm.

In addition to the hardships faced by families, farmers in the region are still dealing with the aftermath of the storm’s destruction.

The damage to crops and infrastructure has made it difficult for many to recover, and the long-term impact on the agricultural community continues to be felt across the state.

The failure of FEMA to effectively assist those impacted by Hurricane Helene has become a symbol of broader challenges within the Biden-Harris administration.

Critics point to the agency’s inability to deliver prompt and sufficient aid as indicative of larger systemic issues, particularly in terms of disaster response and recovery efforts.

As residents and officials continue to await the aid they were promised, the situation in North Carolina remains dire.

With only three families placed in trailers out of the 26 promised, the recovery process seems to be moving at a glacial pace.

Read More at RVM News

crime

Food Fight: Chipotle Employee Attacked in Viral Incident

A violent altercation unfolded at a Chipotle restaurant in Brentwood, Washington, DC, on Saturday when a customer allegedly assaulted an employee over a dispute involving her Uber Eats order.

The incident, partially captured on video and widely shared on social media, has left the employee shaken and raised concerns about workplace safety.

The video, initially posted to X (formerly Twitter), shows the customer, carrying an empty bowl, pushing her way behind the counter.

She proceeds to scoop food into her bowl while employees attempt to stop her.

Roberto Hernandez, a Chipotle worker involved in the altercation, tried to retrieve the bowl, but the situation escalated.

As Hernandez reached for the bowl, the customer pulled it away and slapped him in the face, causing food to scatter across the workstation. “I was mad, upset. But I’m a man, you know I can’t hit a female,” Hernandez told WUSA9, explaining why he walked away from the confrontation.

Hernandez said the conflict began when the customer claimed her Uber Eats order was incorrect.

According to her, the burrito bowl she received did not include the double meat she had requested.

She demanded a refund, but Hernandez and his manager explained that refunds for third-party delivery orders must be handled through Uber Eats.

“I checked the receipt, and it showed she didn’t order double meat,” Hernandez stated.

However, the customer, dissatisfied with their response, took matters into her own hands by going behind the counter to assemble a new order.

The situation became more alarming when Hernandez revealed that the customer allegedly threatened staff after the incident. “Yesterday, she was saying, ‘I’m going to come back and stab them and take their life,’” Hernandez told the outlet, adding that the threats left him and his coworkers fearful.

The unidentified customer, however, disputed the claims, alleging that employees had put their hands on her first.

She told WUSA9, “I wasn’t aggressive toward them until I got assaulted. The video was cut short.” She also claimed that she only “threw” the bowl at the worker and not more.

In response, Chipotle filed a police report, and the customer has stated her intent to sue the restaurant chain.

Read More at Red Voice Media

Congress

Focus Groups Slam Democrats: “Complacent, Elitist, And Out of Touch”

In the wake of their 2024 election loss, Democrats are grappling with sharp criticism from focus groups that highlight voter discontent with the party’s perceived detachment, ineffectiveness, and focus on issues deemed irrelevant to their everyday lives.

The findings, gathered by progressive organization Navigator Research and shared with POLITICO, shed light on the growing divide between Democratic leadership and the electorate.

Navigator Research conducted focus groups with swing voters and former Democrats who supported Donald Trump in 2024 after backing Joe Biden in 2020.

The results painted a picture of a party viewed as complacent, elitist, and disconnected from working-class concerns.

When asked to associate the Democratic Party with an animal, one participant compared it to an ostrich, saying, “They’ve got their heads in the sand and are absolutely committed to their own ideas, even when they’re failing.”

Another likened the party to a koala, critiquing Democrats as “complacent and lazy about getting policy wins that we really need.”

Another participant was more direct, stating, “Democrats are not a friend of the working class anymore.”

A Georgia man who switched his vote to Trump in 2024 noted the party’s focus on social progressivism.

“I think what the Democratic elites and their politicians believe is often very different from what the average Democratic voter is. The elites that run the Democratic Party — I think they’re way too obsessed with appealing to this very far-left social progressivism that’s very popular on college campuses.”

Economic issues like inflation and tariffs revealed additional voter frustration.

Some participants admitted limited understanding of policy implications, while others expressed mixed feelings.

A Wisconsin man stated, “Obviously, I wouldn’t want stuff to go up, but at the same time, in the long run, would it be better off for America and maybe having more stuff made here?”

Rachael Russell, director of polling and analytics at Navigator Research, described the feedback as “a pretty scathing rebuke” of the Democratic Party’s image.

“This weakness they see — [Democrats] not getting things done, not being able to actually fight for people — is something that needs to be figured out. It might not be the message, it might be the policy. It might be something a little bit deeper that has to be addressed by the party.”

Russell suggested Trump’s current popularity reflects a “honeymoon” period, but she predicted a potential shift once he assumes office.

“Once things start happening, it’s going to take a turn, and so it’s going to rely really heavily on the actions in the first 100 days to see how we go from here,” she said.

Focus group participants also expressed doubts about Kamala Harris, the 2024 Democratic presidential nominee.

Descriptions of Harris included terms such as “inauthentic,” “very dishonest,” and “did not seem competent.”

An Arizona man criticized a comment she made during a Detroit speech, “You better thank a union member,” calling it “very disingenuous to me because I didn’t see an honest person that could be president.”

Another former Biden voter who backed Trump in 2024 explained, “It seemed like a lot of what [Harris] came out and said wasn’t really off-the-cuff, wasn’t coming from her. It was planned out and never genuine to her thoughts, whereas Trump, even though you never really knew what he was going to say, it was always him and genuine to what he thought.”

The Trump campaign’s controversial use of a 2019 clip of Harris supporting gender-affirming surgery for prison inmates was also discussed.

The ad’s tagline, “Kamala is for they/them. President Trump is for you,” resonated with some voters.

A Wisconsin woman noted her concerns with the party’s approach to societal norms, including transgender issues. “I think there needs to be some parameters on what’s accepted in society and what isn’t. Some of the societal norms, and I think that the Democrats have tried to open that up a little too much,” she said.

The focus group findings underscore the challenges Democrats face in reconnecting with a broad base of voters, many of whom feel alienated by the party’s current direction.

Read More at Red Voice Media

Big Government, Uncategorized

Georgia Homeowner Jailed for Trying To Evict Squatters From Her Property

A homeowner in Clayton County, Georgia, found herself in a shocking legal predicament after attempting to reclaim her property from an alleged squatter.

Loletha Hale, the rightful owner of the home, was arrested on charges of criminal trespass and making terroristic threats during a confrontation with Sakemeyia Johnson, the woman occupying her property, and her associates.

Hale’s ordeal began in August when she discovered Johnson living in her home.

Johnson claimed her presence was lawful, citing a controversial ruling by Clayton County Magistrate Judge Latrevia Lates-Johnson, who determined that Johnson was not a squatter due to her association with a partner of a previously evicted tenant.

After months of legal disputes, including Johnson filing for bankruptcy to delay eviction proceedings, Hale eventually secured a court judgment affirming her ownership of the property.

However, she had not yet obtained a signed writ of possession, a legal requirement to enforce eviction in Georgia. Believing the property to be vacated, Hale returned to clean and prepare it for her own use. Johnson, however, allegedly broke back into the home, escalating tensions.

When a confrontation ensued, Clayton County police officers and sheriff’s deputies were called to the scene on Livingston Drive on December 9. During the incident, Hale reportedly told Johnson to leave and allegedly threatened to retrieve a firearm.

Body camera footage captured a deputy advising Hale to consider the alleged squatter’s perspective, saying, “Everybody isn’t as fortunate as you to have a bed. All the little things, a bed in their house, food in the kitchen.”

The responding deputy wrote in the incident report that Hale had “executed an illegal eviction and forcibly removed Ms. Johnson’s belongings.”

Cell phone video evidence allegedly recorded Hale saying, “Leave before I get my gun.”

Hale was subsequently arrested, spending a night in jail under conditions she described as deplorable. “I spent the night on a mat on a concrete floor in deplorable conditions. While this woman, this squatter, slept in my home,” Hale told WSB-TV Atlanta.

Meanwhile, Johnson, the alleged squatter, has not been charged with any criminal activity.

This case highlights ongoing tensions in Georgia’s property laws, particularly regarding the rights of property owners versus those of occupants who claim tenancy.

Despite the court ruling in Hale’s favor, the lack of a signed writ of possession meant she could not legally enforce the eviction.

Hale’s arrest has drawn attention to the challenges homeowners face when dealing with individuals occupying their properties.

While she awaits further legal proceedings, questions remain about the balance between protecting property rights and adhering to eviction procedures.

The situation has sparked debate over how law enforcement handles such cases, with some questioning the deputy’s approach and the broader legal framework that allowed the alleged squatter to remain in the home despite Hale’s ownership being upheld in court.

Read More at RVM News

Big Government, Uncategorized

Report: Jill Biden Is Urging Joe To “Burn The Whole Thing Down”

As Joe Biden nears the end of his presidency, his final weeks in office have been a mix of farewell gestures, holiday traditions, and simmering tensions with former allies within the Democratic Party.

Both he and First Lady Jill Biden have taken steps that suggest a focus on settling political scores, reshaping relationships, and preparing for life outside the White House.

Biden recently sparked controversy with his decision to pardon his son, Hunter Biden, just weeks before the end of his term.

The move, which came after months of public statements suggesting he wouldn’t intervene, has reportedly angered senior Democrats.

Alongside this pardon, Joe quietly commuted around 1,500 sentences, including one for an individual connected to the Chinese Communist Party, raising further questions about the administration’s actions in its waning days.

Sources close to the administration claim that Jill Biden has been a significant influence in urging the president to take bold steps during his final weeks. “Jill views Democrats on Capitol Hill, the wider party, the Obamas, staff inside and outside the White House, the media, and all of Washington, D.C., with such misguided resentment that I can’t imagine she [isn’t] encouraging [Joe] to burn the whole thing down,” an insider shared.

Among the Bidens’ perceived adversaries is former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who led efforts earlier this year to convince Biden to drop out of the 2024 presidential race.

Despite decades of friendship, the president has reportedly severed communication with Pelosi, who was notably seated far from the Bidens during the Kennedy Center Honors this month—a marked contrast to her past appearances as a guest of honor.

Kamala Harris has also found herself on shaky ground with the president.

Despite Biden’s swift endorsement of Harris following his withdrawal from the 2024 race, tensions between the two have grown after her defeat by Donald Trump in the presidential election.

Harris lost both the popular vote and the Electoral College, a result that has left Biden reportedly questioning how her campaign failed despite significant financial support.

Democratic donor John Morgan speculated that Biden’s endorsement of Harris may have been partly motivated by frustration with party leaders like Pelosi and Barack Obama, both of whom had reservations about Harris’s candidacy. “I think he got pissed off [and] said, ‘F*** you,’ and gave us Harris,” Morgan remarked.

The Bidens’ final holiday season in the White House has been noticeably subdued.

Fewer parties have been held for staff and supporters, and the president and first lady spent the early part of December overseas.

Some Democratic members received White House tour invitations in lieu of traditional party invites.

During a recent White House women’s health conference, Jill Biden made remarks that many interpreted as a jab at Harris’s campaign slogan centered on “joy.”

Her comments drew laughter from the audience, further fueling speculation about discord within the administration.

With the presidency winding down, Biden is reportedly considering establishing his presidential library in Delaware.

Jill Biden, meanwhile, announced her retirement from teaching, ending her tenure as an English professor at Northern Virginia Community College.

However, the Bidens have made it clear they intend to remain active in the public sphere. “We’re no longer going to be President and First Lady, but we’re not going away,” Biden stated recently.

Amid these plans, some Democratic donors are said to be withholding support for Biden’s post-presidency endeavors, citing frustration over his handling of the 2024 race.

Nonetheless, the Biden family continues to strengthen relationships elsewhere, including with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, whose foundation contributed $250,000 to Ashley Biden’s wellness center in Philadelphia.

As Biden prepares to leave the White House, the administration’s final weeks are a reflection of both its achievements and the challenges that have defined his presidency.

While some celebrate his legacy, others within the Democratic Party are left questioning the choices made in his final chapter.

Read More at RVM News

Big Government, Uncategorized

FBI’s Chris Wray Isn’t Out Of The Woods, Jim Jordan Is Seeking Accountability

FBI Director Christopher Wray announced his resignation on Wednesday, stating he would step down at the end of January.

The announcement marks the end of his tenure leading the bureau during a time of heightened scrutiny and controversy.

Former President Donald Trump quickly named his pick for Wray’s replacement, selecting Kash Patel, a known Trump ally with experience in the Department of Defense and as a senior advisor to the Director of National Intelligence.

While some welcomed Wray’s resignation, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee and a vocal critic of Wray, made it clear that the FBI director’s departure does not absolve him of accountability.

Speaking to Fox News Digital, Jordan celebrated the news but reiterated his commitment to ongoing oversight of the bureau.

Jordan described Wray’s resignation as “great” news and criticized his tenure, pointing to what he called significant missteps.

“I mean, Chris Wray was, you know, investigating moms and dads who show up for school board meetings. He was putting out a memorandum on saying, ‘If you’re a pro-life Catholic, you’re an extremist.’ The FBI retaliated against whistleblowers who came and gave us that kind of information. We learned yesterday that they were spying on congressional staffers and their metadata. And of course, he raided President Trump’s home,” Jordan said.

The Ohio congressman has overseen multiple investigations into the FBI and Department of Justice through the Judiciary Committee, many of which have focused on allegations of political bias and misconduct under Wray’s leadership. Jordan emphasized that the work of holding the FBI accountable is far from over.

When asked whether his committee’s oversight of Wray’s handling of the bureau would continue, Jordan replied, “Oh, yeah.”

He added that additional reports from the inspector general could soon shed light on further issues within the FBI.

“And there’s, we think, reports coming that are going to, you know, shed even more light on what’s been going on down line from the inspector general,” Jordan told Fox News Digital.

Jordan’s comments come amid ongoing frustration among some pundits and observers over the perceived lack of consequences for alleged wrongdoing exposed by congressional investigations.

Critics argue that despite revelations of misconduct, little accountability has been enforced during the past several years.

The landscape of federal law enforcement and justice oversight could shift significantly if Donald Trump, who has announced his intention to seek another term in the White House, returns to office.

Trump’s proposed appointments include Kash Patel as FBI director and former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi as the head of the Department of Justice.

Supporters of these moves anticipate a more aggressive approach to addressing what they view as the politicization of the justice system.

With new leadership in key positions, they hope to see accountability measures enacted to prevent similar controversies in the future.

As the transition unfolds, all eyes will remain on the House Judiciary Committee and other oversight bodies to ensure transparency and fairness in the FBI and beyond.

Read More at Red Voice Media


Scroll to Top