Author name: Red Voice Media

Image Credit: © Josh Morgan / USA TODAY NETWORK
Democrats

Trump Drops a Bombshell: Hints at New Investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden

/

Image Credit: © Josh Morgan / USA TODAY NETWORK

President Donald Trump has reignited scrutiny over a nearly two-year-old cocaine discovery in the White House, suggesting that either Joe Biden or his son, Hunter Biden, may have been responsible.

Trump recently vowed to reopen the investigation into the matter, which federal authorities previously closed due to inconclusive findings.

Image Credit: Below the Sky – Shutterstock.com

The incident dates back to July 2023, when a small plastic bag containing cocaine was found inside a storage cubby near a public entrance to the West Wing. The discovery prompted an immediate evacuation and a full investigation by the U.S. Secret Service. The area where the bag was found is frequently accessed by visitors and White House staff.

At the time, President Biden and his family were at Camp David.

The Secret Service conducted fingerprint and DNA testing on the evidence, but no conclusive results were found. After 11 days, the investigation was closed without any suspects identified.

Earlier this month, Trump made it clear that he intends to revisit the case.

In an interview published Friday by The Spectator, journalist Ben Domenech asked him directly, “So… who actually left the cocaine in the White House?”

“Well, either Joe or Hunter,” Trump responded. “Could be Joe, too.”

Trump then criticized the handling of the case, questioning why the evidence appeared to have been wiped clean.

“OK, so that was such a terrible thing because, you know, those bins are very loaded up with… they’re not clean, and they have hundreds and even thousands of fingerprints. And when they went to look at it, it was absolutely stone cold, wiped dry. You know that, right?”

Domenech acknowledged Trump’s point, recalling his experience as a Bush administration speechwriter.

“Well, because, I mean, I was briefly a Bush speechwriter. And so I knew exactly what they were talking about. And I was like, ‘Those things are filthy.’ They’re filthy.”

Trump continued pressing the issue, questioning the lack of fingerprint evidence.

“And there were fingerprints. I mean, if you went to one, maybe we’re cleaner, but if you went to one at any time, you would see hundreds. Everybody in there would leave a fingerprint when they went in, and that thing was wiped out with, with the strongest form of alcohol.”

“By the way, and I have to tell you, I think I’m going to look into that because it was… bad stuff happened there,” Trump concluded.

The handling of the case has previously faced criticism, particularly regarding the Secret Service’s decision to dispose of the cocaine evidence.

Reports from RealClearPolitics indicated that former Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle, who was appointed by Biden, sought to keep the incident from becoming a major media issue, leading to internal conflicts within the agency.

According to the report, Cheatle and other high-ranking officials allegedly attempted to have the cocaine evidence destroyed.

However, the Secret Service Forensics Services Division and the Uniformed Division reportedly refused, resulting in internal disagreements over how to proceed.

Initially, conflicting reports emerged about the exact location of the discovery before officials confirmed it was in a vestibule near a White House entrance. The Secret Service sent the cocaine for testing, where analysts found a “partial DNA hit,” though no suspects were identified. The investigation was ultimately closed due to the lack of conclusive physical evidence.

The issue remains a point of political contention, with critics using it to highlight concerns about the Biden administration. While no definitive evidence has linked any individual to the cocaine, Trump’s promise to revisit the investigation has once again put the incident in the spotlight.

Visit RVM News for more articles like this.

Provided by Steve Anderson
Democrats, Election

Bill Maher: Democrats Will “Lose Every Election” if They Keep Doing This

/

Bill Maher is cautioning Democrats that forcing government control over parental rights in transgender matters will result in electoral disaster for the party.

Speaking on the Pod Save America podcast, Maher told former Obama speechwriter Jon Lovett that Democrats risk losing every election if they continue pushing policies that undermine parental authority.

“You want to lose every election? Just keep coming down on the side of parents coming in second in a ‘Who gets to decide what goes on with my kid’ contest,” Maher said.

Maher’s remarks came in response to Lovett’s argument that parents should only have a say in their child’s transgender-related decisions if they fully support their child’s identity.

Lovett implied that parents who do not affirm their child’s transgender identity are comparable to abusive parents who endanger their children.

“I don’t want Donald Trump deciding [child trans-related issues], I want parents and doctors—” Lovett began before Maher cut in.

“Well, you just said parents can get shut out,” Maher responded.

Lovett attempted to clarify his stance, saying, “I don’t think parents should get shut out. There are rare exceptions to that… but we also recognize that some parents do such a bad f**king job, that the kids are in danger.”

He continued, “That happens outside of trans issues, that happens all the time. Some parents are f**king terrible.”

Lovett went on to claim that the reality of “terrible parents” is often ignored in discussions about transgender policies. He insisted, “Do I think that schools should, as a baseline, be keeping a secret from parents? Of-f**king-course not. No one thinks that.”

Maher pushed back, stating, “Apparently that’s not true. People do think that.”

During the discussion, Lovett compared regrettable transgender surgeries to botched heart surgeries, suggesting that mistakes in the medical field do not justify banning a particular treatment.

“There are also really important surgeries that people get for their heart, and they go wrong, and somebody dies. And nobody says, ‘We must stop the cardiologists.’ No one says, ‘We must stop the surgeons,’” Lovett said.

A skeptical Maher responded, “Wow. That’s your analogy?”

Lovett continued, “We don’t get rid of the specific surgery. We don’t throw out a whole field of medicine. We say, ‘Let’s make sure we’re doing it in a way that’s healthy.’”

He defended so-called gender-affirming care, stating, “The science, the research, makes clear that, yes, there are exceptions. Yes, there are people practicing it in ways that maybe go too far, but for the most part, study after study shows that gender-affirming care saves a lot of lives.”

He also dismissed concerns over transgender procedures as “edge cases.”

Maher then referenced a major story published by The New York Times, which revealed that a ten-year study on transgender medical interventions was deliberately withheld because the findings did not support the preferred narrative.

“So in other words, it came out not the way you wanted the study to come out — not what you said, that, ‘Oh, all the studies show’ — no,” Maher said.

He acknowledged that for some individuals, transgender medical treatments may be appropriate, but questioned the risks involved in performing irreversible procedures on minors.

“Some people, yes, [trans surgeries] are the right thing,” Maher said.

“But to take that risk at that age, before you know sh*t about anything — and again, this was a very long study, very thorough. And they wouldn’t release it, because it came out with the wrong conclusion.”

Maher’s remarks highlight an ongoing political battle over parental rights and government involvement in transgender policies.

As Democratic leaders continue pushing school and state-driven policies that limit parental oversight in these decisions, Maher’s warning suggests the party risks alienating voters who see these policies as overreach.

With parental rights becoming a key issue ahead of the 2024 elections, Maher’s comments could reflect a broader concern among some Democrats that pushing too far could cost them at the ballot box.

Read more articles like this at RVM News

Governor Kathy Hochul, Mayor Eric Adams, and MTA Chair & CEO Janno Lieber announce a Subway Safety Plan at Fulton Transit Center on Fri., February 18, 2022...(Marc A. Hermann / MTA)
Big Cities

Famed NYC Illegal Alien Shelter Shutting Down as New Arrival Numbers Plummet

/

The Roosevelt Hotel migrant shelter in Manhattan is set to close in the coming months as the number of asylum seekers in New York City’s care continues to decline, Mayor Eric Adams announced Monday.

The shelter, which has served as a key intake center for migrants, will likely stop operations by June, according to sources.

Since the influx of migrants to New York City began in spring 2022, more than 232,000 asylum seekers have arrived in the city. However, with recent shifts in federal immigration policy, the number of new arrivals has dropped significantly.

Adams stated that the city is now seeing an average of 350 new migrants entering city care each week— a dramatic decrease from the peak of 4,000 weekly arrivals at the height of the crisis.

City data shows that in the week leading up to February 2, about 200 new migrants sought assistance from the city, while 1,800 exited shelters.

In the first week of President Donald Trump’s new term, 300 new migrants entered the system while 1,800 left.

By comparison, the final weeks of Joe Biden’s presidency saw between 400 and 500 new arrivals per week, a decline from the 700 to 900 migrants arriving weekly over the summer.

Adams, 64, framed the Roosevelt Hotel shelter’s closure as a positive step, crediting “the successful strategies we put in place here in New York City and because of policies we advocated for at the border.”

“While we’re not done caring for those that came into our care, today marks another milestone in demonstrating the immense progress we have achieved in turning the corner on the unprecedented international humanitarian effort,” Adams said in a video announcement.

Although the Roosevelt Hotel will shut down as a migrant shelter, newly arriving asylum seekers will still be able to register at other locations, according to City Hall.

At one point in January 2024, there were approximately 69,000 migrants in the city’s shelter system. That number has now dropped to less than 45,000, according to officials.

The Adams administration has announced plans to close 53 migrant shelters across the city, including all tent shelters, between June 2023 and June 2024.

The Roosevelt Hotel, which contains about 1,000 rooms, was converted into a migrant intake center and shelter in May 2023 as the city struggled to manage the influx of asylum seekers, many of whom had been bused from southern border states. Since then, more than 173,000 migrants have registered at the site.

However, the hotel has faced various issues since its transformation, with reports of gang activity, illegal motorbike deliveries blocking sidewalks, and migrants sleeping in cars due to overcrowding, according to sources.

Adams’ announcement follows New York City’s lawsuit against the Trump administration over $80.5 million in migrant funding that had previously been approved by Congress.

The White House reallocated the funds last week, prompting the city’s legal action.

The mayor has also faced accusations that he struck a deal with the Trump administration to assist in the president’s illegal immigration crackdown in exchange for the Department of Justice (DOJ) dropping a federal corruption case against him. Both Adams and the DOJ have denied these allegations.

The criminal case against Adams remains unresolved. A judge stated Friday that he wants to hear from an independent lawyer before ruling on whether to grant the DOJ’s motion to dismiss the case. Adams has denied all wrongdoing.

As the city continues to manage its migrant crisis, the closure of the Roosevelt Hotel shelter marks a turning point in New York’s approach to handling asylum seekers.

Read More at Red Voice Media

DEI

DNC Doubles Down on Failure, Releases “Deeply Embarrassing and Useless Document”

/

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) has named Ken Martin as its new chair, signaling a continued shift toward progressive leadership following the party’s defeat in the 2024 elections.

Martin, a political leader from Minnesota, previously served as vice chair of the unsuccessful Harris-Walz presidential campaign.

Martin’s appointment on February 1 comes as the Democratic Party looks to rebuild after suffering major losses in November. However, despite the electoral setback, Martin expressed confidence in the party’s direction.

“Notably, Martin said during his campaign for chair that the party already has ‘the right message,’” Politico reported.

Shortly after taking office, Martin unveiled his first major strategic directive, outlining how Democrats intend to challenge President Donald Trump’s economic agenda.

“Today, I released a framework detailing how the Democratic Party will fight against Trump’s war on working people,” Martin announced in a post on X on Wednesday.

The DNC memo, titled “Democrats Will Fight Against Trump’s War on Working People,” lays out a plan to regain political ground by promoting unionization efforts and criticizing the Trump administration’s policies.

According to Powerline’s John Hinderaker, the strategy appears outdated.

“The memo reads like a time capsule from the 1930s. It is all about unions and alleged union-busting by the Trump administration. This might appeal to the Democrats’ core constituency, overpaid government workers. But currently, fewer than 6% of private sector employees in the U.S. are unionized, an all-time low,” Hinderaker noted.

Martin’s memo also warns against Project 2025, a policy framework drafted by conservative groups outlining priorities for a second Trump term. The DNC memo frames the initiative as a threat to working-class Americans.

“To implement his dark Project 2025 vision and deliver handouts for the ultra-wealthy, Donald Trump is assembling the wealthiest U.S. Cabinet in American history, stacked with out-of-touch, special interest billionaires who are looking out for themselves and their balance sheets over working families,” Martin stated.

Democrats are expected to continue attacking Trump’s economic policies, attempting to frame his administration as favoring the wealthy while ignoring working Americans.

As part of the effort to reconnect with blue-collar voters, Martin launched the campaign alongside United Steelworkers International Vice President at Large Roxanne Brown.

The event took place in Pennsylvania, a key battleground state that has been heavily impacted by shifts in energy policy.

https://twitter.com/kenmartin73/status/1891965794319278236

The Biden-Harris administration’s stance on fossil fuels has been widely criticized for hurting industries in states like Pennsylvania.

Despite this, Democrats are now positioning themselves as champions of workers in regions where their own policies have led to economic challenges. The DNC’s strategy suggests that the party will lean heavily on union support and economic populism to regain ground ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

However, with many working-class voters shifting toward Trump in 2024, it remains to be seen whether these efforts will resonate with a base that has increasingly rejected Democratic leadership in recent election cycles.

Read More at RVM News

Welfare

Joe Biden’s $5 Billion “Aid” Mystery: “The Government Has Been Robbing Us Blind”

/

Fox News host Jesse Watters took aim at the Biden administration during a recent segment of Fox News Primetime, calling out what he described as massive waste and corruption in the handling of taxpayer funds.

Watters detailed millions of dollars being spent on questionable foreign projects, arguing that the government is misallocating resources while ignoring problems at home.

“The government’s been robbing us blind,” Watters stated.

“We’ve been writing checks—6 million for tourism in Egypt. Like Egypt needs help with that. They have the pyramids. We should be spending money on cleaning up California so that tourists can vacation in California.”

He continued to list expenditures he deemed unnecessary, including $2 million for the BBC to promote diversity coverage in Libya, $20 million for Iraqi Sesame Street, and $1 million for an LGBTQ group in Armenia.

“We’re bribing the BBC to cover Libya better,” Watters said.

“Why a million for a gay group in Armenia? There it is. We paid 20 million for Iraqi Sesame Street. You paid for Bert and Ernie in Baghdad. Weren’t we just bombing these people? Now we’re paying for their Muppet shows. We’re sick. There is something sick with us. You also paid for an Irish DEI musical.”

Watters did not hold back in his criticism of USAID, the agency responsible for administering foreign aid.

He pointed to $2 million spent on transgender surgeries in Guatemala, questioning where the money actually went.

“This is a government theft ring,” Watters said.

“We spent $2 million for trans surgeries in Guatemala. I’m going to go out on a limb—one Guatemalan dude got breast implants, and we probably kicked back the rest of the cash to a crooked Guatemalan politician and the corrupt liberal CEO of the group they laundered the money through.”

Watters went further, arguing that such extravagant spending could have “turned the whole world trans” and questioning the true cost of projects like the $20 million allocated for Iraqi Sesame Street.

“You really think it costs 20 million to produce an episode of Sesame Street? You could hire Tom Cruise to play Oscar the Grouch for that money,” he quipped.

In addition to these projects, Watters accusedJoe Biden of sending $5 billion to unnamed foreign sources, suggesting the funds were being used for political bribes and left-wing subsidies.

“Check this—Biden paid nearly $5 billion to unnamed foreign sources,” Watters said.

“Whoever is getting our money is so shady our government can’t even put it in writing. They just call it aid.”

He speculated that much of this money was used to bribe foreign officials, secure business deals for American companies, or funnel resources into left-wing foundations.

“Most of the people getting money from these grants aren’t in the country. They pump it into overseas organizations and then we never see them,” he said. “Any liberal with an International Women’s Studies degree can launch a 501(c)(3), apply for a government grant, and spin it off into a left-wing piggy bank.”

Watters also took aim at USAID’s $235 million allocation to the National Democratic Institute (NDI), suggesting that much of the money was used for executive salaries rather than democracy programs.

“USAID paid $235 million to the National Democratic Institute. Well, that sounds benign. No. Millions of that money went to executive compensation—meaning salaries for all the Liberals with no skills,” Watters explained.

“I bet most of that money didn’t go to supporting democracy. It went to supporting liberal lifestyles.”

He accused Democrats of profiting off taxpayer dollars, claiming that the USAID system has been a financial pipeline for left-wing operatives for years.

“Democrats have been sucking off the teat of government for decades, and Trump caught them,” Watters said.

“As one Trump insider says, you bring USAID to heel and you end the Democrat gravy train.”

Watters suggested that USAID was just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to government waste, arguing that deeper investigations would uncover massive misallocation of funds across multiple agencies.

“USAID is just the beginning. You start peeling back at the layers of every agency, and all you find out is pork that winds up in the wrong people’s pockets,” he said.

Read More at RVM News

Uncategorized

Stacey Abrams-Linked “Voting Rights” Group in Chaos After Massive Ethics Violation Fine 

/

Fair Fight Action, the voting rights organization founded by Stacey Abrams, is facing major financial difficulties following a record-breaking fine imposed by the Georgia State Ethics Commission.

The financial strain has led to mass layoffs and internal restructuring as the group struggles to sustain its operations.

The crisis has also impacted the New Georgia Project (NGP), a grassroots organization launched by Abrams. More than 30 employees were laid off in two rounds between December and January, many with little notice.

According to a GoFundMe campaign launched Wednesday, the organization cited economic challenges and reduced fundraising as key reasons for the downsizing.

The layoffs began on December 27, when 19 staff members were dismissed with less than 12 hours’ notice. Another 12 employees were let go at the end of January, according to FOX5.

Stephanie Ali, NGP’s policy director, set up a crowdfunding campaign to assist those affected, attributing the situation to external financial pressures.

“The organization has stated these reductions in force (RIFs) are due to economic downturns, reductions in fundraising in an ‘off’ election year, and other contributing factors,” Ali wrote.

“No matter the reason, with this, over 30 of some of the most dedicated organizers, door knockers, and field tacticians who dedicated years of their lives to this work are now out of work – some whose insurance will lapse as soon as February 1.”

The financial turmoil follows a ruling from the Georgia State Ethics Commission, which imposed its largest-ever fine on NGP and its affiliated New Georgia Project Action Fund.

The groups admitted to 16 violations of state law, including improperly supporting Abrams’ 2018 gubernatorial campaign and failing to disclose millions in campaign contributions and expenditures.

NGP leadership stated that the layoffs were necessary to align staffing with available resources but maintained that the organization remains committed to voter registration and outreach efforts.

In 2024, NGP reported registering more than 55,000 Georgians, knocking on over 841,000 doors, and deploying more than 200 poll monitors.

“The volunteers, members, and staff of NGP are family, and reductions in staffing are never easy.

Nevertheless, NGP must meet its obligation to align its staffing plan with available resources to accomplish its mission,” the organization said in a statement to FOX5.

NGP, which Abrams founded in 2013, has faced increasing scrutiny over its financial and legal practices.

In January, the Georgia Ethics Commission fined NGP and the New Georgia Project Action Fund $300,000 for violations of state campaign finance laws related to the 2018 elections.

According to The Associated Press, the groups failed to register as independent campaign committees and did not properly report approximately $4.2 million in contributions and $3.2 million in expenditures.

These funds primarily supported Abrams’ gubernatorial campaign, marking one of the largest campaign finance penalties in Georgia history.

Investigators found that NGP engaged in electioneering activities such as canvassing and phone banking in support of Abrams without proper registration and transparency.

Additionally, in 2019, NGP failed to disclose $646,000 in contributions and $174,000 in expenditures related to a public transit referendum in Gwinnett County. Both Abrams and U.S. Senator Raphael Warnock (D-GA), who previously served as chairman of NGP, have denied any involvement in the violations.

However, the fallout from the investigation and financial penalties has left the organization struggling to maintain operations amid mounting legal and ethical concerns.

Read More at RVM News

crime, Trans

Radical Transgender Militant Group Linked to Border Patrol Agent Murder in Vermont 

/

Federal investigators have linked the murder of a U.S. Border Patrol agent near the Canadian border to a radical militant group accused of multiple killings across the country.

Border Patrol agent David Maland was shot and killed on January 20 during a routine traffic stop in Coventry, Vermont.

The suspects, identified as German national Felix “Ophelia” Bauckholt and University of Washington student Teresa “Milo” Consuelo Youngblut, were traveling in a Toyota Prius when they were stopped.

Authorities say Youngblut opened fire on Maland, killing him, before border agents returned fire, killing Bauckholt. Youngblut was taken into custody.

Court documents reveal that federal law enforcement had been monitoring Bauckholt and Youngblut in the days leading up to the shooting. Staff at a Lyndonville, Vermont, motel had reported seeing the pair with firearms and black tactical clothing.

When law enforcement questioned them, they claimed to be scouting property in the area before checking out of the motel on January 14.

Authorities now say that the weapons used in the attack were linked to a larger investigation involving a shadowy extremist group known as the “Zizians.” This group, led by Jack LaSota—also known by the alias “Ziz”—has been connected to at least four homicides.

Bauckholt, a biological male identifying as transgender, had an extensive background in mathematics and finance.

Originally from Freiburg, Germany, he graduated from the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada, before working as a quantitative trader at Tower Research Capital in New York. Investigators believe he was in the U.S. on an H-1B visa.

Youngblut, a biological female identifying as transgender, was a computer science student at the University of Washington.

Social media records show Youngblut followed multiple far-left, Antifa-aligned accounts and had been reported missing by family members in May 2024. The family told police they believed she was in a controlling relationship and had cut off contact.

The case took another turn last week when authorities arrested Maximilian Bentley Snyder, a Seattle resident and former classmate of Youngblut. Snyder was charged with the murder of 82-year-old Curtis Lind, an elderly man who was set to testify in an upcoming attempted murder trial involving alleged members of the “Ziz” group. Prosecutors say Snyder killed Lind to prevent his testimony.

Lind was the sole witness in a case against two alleged members of the Ziz group—Suri Dao and Alexander “Somni” Leatham—who are accused of attempting to murder him in 2022.

During that attack, Lind was stabbed multiple times and lost an eye but managed to shoot and kill one of his assailants, Amir “Emma” Borhanian. Authorities have also identified bioinformatics researcher Michelle Jacqueline Zajko as a person of interest.

Zajko, a transgender nonbinary individual, was previously linked to the Ziz group and is believed to have supplied firearms to Bauckholt and Youngblut. Zajko has not been charged with a crime but remains under investigation for a double homicide in Delaware County, Pennsylvania.

Following the border shooting, investigators searched Bauckholt and Youngblut’s vehicle and discovered a cache of weapons and tactical gear, including:

  • Two pistols and multiple magazines
  • Night-vision goggles
  • Two full-face respirators
  • A ballistic helmet
  • 48 rounds of hollow-point ammunition
  • Interstate lodging records
  • Two-way radios
  • Multiple electronic devices wrapped in foil

Authorities also searched their prior residence in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, where they had been living in an Airbnb with other members of the Ziz group. The property owner reported that Youngblut had parked a large box truck on the premises, where group members frequently gathered.

Federal prosecutors have cited Youngblut’s connections to other violent individuals as a reason to deny bail.

In a January 27 court motion, prosecutor Matthew Lasher wrote, “Her associations with other individuals suspected of violent acts also warrants caution.” Meanwhile, online supporters of the Ziz group have attempted to pressure people not to cooperate with authorities.

Following the murder of witness Curtis Lind, one social media account linked to the group posted, “Ladies and gentlemen, we got him.”

As federal agencies continue to investigate the extent of the Ziz group’s operations, questions remain about their broader network and future threats.

Law enforcement officials have not ruled out additional arrests as they work to uncover more connections between the group’s members and recent violent incidents across multiple states.

Read More at RVM News

Congress, Uncategorized

Trump Launches Task Force 250 to Plan an “Extraordinary Celebration” of America

/

President Donald Trump will sign an executive order on Wednesday to establish Task Force 250, a White House-led initiative coordinating the national celebration of America’s 250th anniversary in 2026, Fox News Digital has learned.

The executive order outlines plans for a “grand celebration of the semiquincentennial of the ratification of the Declaration of Independence.” The milestone will mark 250 years since the nation’s founding on July 4, 1776.

The newly formed Task Force 250 will be responsible for organizing and overseeing federal agency efforts related to the anniversary celebrations.

The White House stated that the initiative draws inspiration from the U.S. Bicentennial Celebration of 1976, which emphasized national renewal and unity following a period of division.

“The 250th anniversary will afford an opportunity to unite the American people around their shared history and common future as a nation,” a White House official said.

In addition to establishing Task Force 250, the executive order will reinstate Trump-era initiatives originally signed in 2020 and 2021.

Among them is the creation of the National Garden of American Heroes, a statuary park dedicated to honoring 250 historically significant Americans.

The National Garden of American Heroes was first proposed during Trump’s first term in response to monuments and statues being vandalized or destroyed during nationwide protests.

The garden is expected to feature statues of influential figures, with the first 100 statues commissioned under the new order.

Additionally, Trump’s order will reinstate protections for American monuments, memorials, and statues to prevent their destruction or vandalism.

The White House emphasized that the new executive order is part of Trump’s longstanding commitment to celebrating America’s 250th anniversary and preserving the nation’s history.

Trump previously referenced the upcoming semiquincentennial during his first address to a joint session of Congress in February 2017, stating:

“In nine years, the United States will celebrate the 250th anniversary of our founding, 250 years since the day we declared our Independence.”

The executive orders being reinstated were originally signed during Trump’s first term in response to unrest and violence in cities, where monuments of American presidents and Founding Fathers were targeted and, in some cases, never restored.

As the country approaches July 4, 2026, Task Force 250 will work to ensure that the nation’s semiquincentennial is recognized with a historic and patriotic celebration.

Read More at RVM News

Big Government, Uncategorized

Trump 2028?: GOP Lawmaker Proposes Constitutional Amendment for Potential Third Term

/

A Republican congressman has introduced a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that could pave the way for former President Donald Trump to potentially serve a third term in the White House.

Representative Andy Ogles (R-TN) announced the amendment, stating it would allow a two-term president to serve a third term if the terms were non-consecutive.

Ogles argued the change is necessary to ensure the country can benefit from what he called “bold leadership” during times of crisis.

“President Trump’s decisive leadership stands in stark contrast to the chaos, suffering, and economic decline Americans have endured over the past four years,” Ogles said in a statement on Thursday.

“He has proven himself to be the only figure in modern history capable of reversing our nation’s decay and restoring America to greatness, and he must be given the time necessary to accomplish that goal.”

The proposed amendment reads:

“No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times, nor be elected to any additional term after being elected to two consecutive terms, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.”

The amendment would create a legal framework to allow a president to serve a third term under certain conditions.

If passed, it would add to the historical precedent of non-consecutive presidencies, a distinction currently held only by President Grover Cleveland, who served as both the 22nd and 24th President of the United States.

The 22nd Amendment, ratified in 1951, currently limits presidents to two terms.

This was established after Franklin Delano Roosevelt served an unprecedented four terms, setting a new precedent for presidential term limits.

While the proposed amendment aligns with Rep. Ogles’ vision for Trump’s leadership, Trump himself has often joked about the idea of a third term.

His remarks, frequently made in jest, have nonetheless drawn strong reactions from his critics.

One of Trump’s notable posts on his Truth Social platform included a meme depicting campaign signs for “Trump 2024, Trump 2028, Trump 2032,” eventually expanding into far-off centuries.

The post was widely circulated and sparked debate across political circles.

Following his victory in the 2024 election, Trump joked during a meeting with Republican lawmakers about the prospect of another term. “I suspect I won’t be running again, unless you do something,” he said. “Unless you say, ‘He’s so good, we have to just figure it out.’”

Republican lawmakers who attended the meeting clarified that the comments were made in jest.

“That was a joke. It was clearly a joke,” said Rep. Tim Burchett (R-OK). Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) reportedly echoed the sentiment, predicting media outlets would mischaracterize the president’s comments as serious.

Despite the proposed amendment and his occasional jokes, Trump has stated that he does not plan to pursue a third term.

“I wouldn’t be in favor of a challenge. Not for me. I wouldn’t be in favor of it at all,” Trump told Time magazine in a prior interview.

“I intend to serve four years and do a great job. And I want to bring our country back. I want to put it back on the right track.”

While the amendment faces significant legal and political hurdles, it underscores the continued influence of Trump’s presidency and the strong support he maintains among Republican lawmakers and voters.

Read More at RVM News

Trans

Transgender ACLU Lawyer Makes Up New Term for Women and the Internet Explodes

/

ACLU lawyer and transgender rights activist Chase Strangio stirred controversy Tuesday during an appearance on the left-wing digital news show Democracy Now!, where she referred to biological women as “non-transgender women” while criticizing President Donald Trump’s executive order on sex and gender.

Strangio, a transgender man, expressed concern over the executive order, which clarifies the U.S. government’s stance on recognizing only two biological sexes, male and female.

Strangio appeared on the show to slam Trump’s executive order, titled “Defending women from gender ideology extremism and restoring biological truth to the federal government.”

The order asserts that biological men and women are distinct and mandates that agencies follow these directives.

One key provision of the order requires the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to create policies protecting women seeking single-sex spaces, such as rape shelters, from being forced to share spaces with individuals of the opposite biological sex.

Strangio objected to this part of the executive order, claiming that it could “exclude trans people from various forms of shelter” under the assumption that transgender individuals pose an inherent threat to “non-transgender women.”

She further argued that the executive order “enhances the risk that transgender people face in society” by treating them as a threat simply because of their existence in certain spaces.

Strangio’s comment referring to biological women as “non-transgender women” sparked a reaction online, with many critics questioning the terminology.

Conservative social media accounts shared clips of Strangio’s remarks, with one prominent account, End Wokeness, highlighting the moment with the caption, “ACLU lawyer Chase Strangio is panicking that Trump banned men from ‘non-trans women’ (women) locker rooms.”

Conservative commentator Paul Szypula also weighed in, criticizing Strangio’s remarks in a post on X. Szypula described Strangio as a “woman pretending to be a man” and mocked the idea that biological women should be referred to as “non-transgender women.” He added, “Chase can whine all she wants. That doesn’t change the fact that she has XX chromosomes and is a woman. So either she stays out of men’s bathrooms, or she goes to a women’s jail.”

Collin Rugg, co-owner of Trending Politics, also commented on Strangio’s terminology, writing, “NEW: Transgender ACLU lawyer Chase Strangio refers to biological women as ‘non-transgender women’ while losing it over Trump’s new executive orders. This voice catches me off guard every time.” Rugg quipped, “Life hack: You can save some time by simply referring to them as ‘women.’”

Strangio’s comments reflect the ongoing debate over gender identity and the rights of transgender individuals in the context of biological sex, particularly in spaces like shelters and bathrooms.

Critics argue that policies supporting single-sex facilities are essential for protecting the rights and safety of biological women, while others like Strangio view such policies as discriminatory toward transgender people.

The debate continues to gain traction as more states and government entities grapple with how to balance transgender rights with protections for women and other groups.

Read More at RVM News


Subscribe Form

© 2025 WokeSpy All Rights Reserved

Scroll to Top