Author name: Martin Tribe

Illegal Immigration

Furious Stephen Miller Demands Reparations for All Americans Harmed by Unchecked Illegal Immigration

/

United States Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller has identified the right group of Americans who are rightly entitled to reparations for harms resulting from bad government policies. 

Over the years, the debate has ignited strong emotions from the left that believe children of former slaves were entitled to reparations based on race alone. U.S. Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass) even sponsored House Bill H.R. 40, dubbed the Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African Americans Act.

However, Miller threw a new wrench in the works by making a strong case for reparations for all Americans who have endured the negative effects of uncontrolled illegal immigration, whose harms, he said, could take more than a lifetime to enumerate.

Appearing on Newsmax, Miller responded to arguments that the deported alleged MS-13 gang member, Kilmer Abrego Garcia, should receive $1 million in daily compensation for each day he spent in his home country of El Salvador after Trump’s deportation.

“Where is compensation for Americans… where do they go to get their reparations?” Miller asked. 

He listed various groups of Americans harmed by the former administration’s open borders policy. They include millions of schoolgoing children who can no longer learn to read and write because their schools need hundreds of translators to cater to non-English speaking learners, disrupting the entire learning process.

“We had an entire generation of Americans, multiple generations, in fact, have been robbed of educational opportunities,” Miller lamented.

Others qualifying for reparations due to unchecked illegal immigration include city residents who can no longer access basic services that have been overstretched by illegal immigrants. Urban dwellers who also have endured increased crime and have been internally displaced when foreign gangs, like Tren de Aragua, take over cities and apartment buildings, are also entitled to reparations. 

“Entire cities. Look at Los Angeles…once a paradise of safety, security and prosperity, entire neighborhoods occupied and controlled by foreign gangs,” he added. “Where do all the residents who have been displaced, who have been forced out of Los Angeles? Where do they go to get their reparations?”

Similarly, victims of the immigration-fueled fentanyl crisis and angel parents of children killed by illegal aliens. Recently, Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen faced backlash after making grand gestures in support of the deported alleged MS-gang member while barely acknowledging one of the angel moms in his backyard. 

At least 6 illegal immigrants, including an El Salvadoran national, have been convicted or accused of murder in Maryland, while over 13,000 alien murderers countrywide are living outside ICE detention. Maryland also peaked in fentanyl-related deaths in 2021 when Biden took over, with “Black individuals, males, and adults aged 31–60” mostly affected.

“What about the victims of fentanyl poisoning brought in by Democrats’ open border, hundreds of thousands of moms and dads whose kids are dead and buried in the ground,” Miller continued. “Where do they go to get their reparations from the government, and then all the women who have been raped, who’ve been beated, who’ve been murdered.”

Ironically, the Democratic martyr was twice accused of domestic violence by his American wife and slapped with a restraining order.

“[What about] All the dads who’ve been shot dead and our home? All the police officers who have been slain by illegal aliens in ambush attacks in the line of duty?” Miller asked.

Others include hundreds of thousands of childrens trafficked into the country, raped and assulted during the process and placed with unvetted guardians who could be their traffickers. According to Miller, all Americans are entitled to reparations due to decades of illegal immigration that have robbed the country of its wealth, prosperity, and security.

“We can spend the rest of our lives trying to document those harms,” he added.

“Where does our whole country go to get repaid for all of the wealth, all of the prosperity and security that has been stolen from us by decades of uncontrolled, illegal mass migration? Because we all deserve reparations…for what has been stolen from us.”

Ironically, Democrats do not demand compensation for scores of Americans illegally kidnapped and held in foreign hellhole prisons, including those still captured in Gaza by the Islamic terrorist group Hamas, without due process. Additionally, Democrats have been fighting to prevent the deportation of pro-Hamas demonstration organizers, who have declared war on Western civilization.

Courts

Justice Alito Fires a Scathing Dissent after SCOTUS Blocks Deportation of Venezuelan Alleged Gangbangers

/

The US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has fired off a blistering dissent against the court’s order to halt the Trump administration’s deportation of Venezuelan illegal immigrants under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 (AEA).

The court had previously allowed the Trump administration to continue deportations under the act on a limited basis with due process. However, the new ruling halted the deportation of all Venezuelan immigrants until the government receives further instructions from the court.

“The Government is directed not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this Court,” the unsigned order stated.

In an unexpected turn of events, conservative justices Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett voted in favor of halting the deportations in a 7-2 ruling. However, Justice Clarence Thomas joined Justice Alito in the fiery dissent.

Meanwhile, Justice Alito questioned the timing of the ruling, which he claims was issued “hastily and prematurely” within eight hours of receiving the notice, “literally in the middle of the night” and without giving lower courts time to sort out the facts of the cases.

“[T]he Court issued unprecedented and legally questionable relief without giving the lower courts a chance to rule, without hearing from the opposing party, within eight hours of receiving the application, with dubious factual support for its order, and without providing any explanation for its order,” he fumed.

“I refused to join the Court’s order because we had no good reason to think that, under the circumstances, issuing an order at midnight was necessary or appropriate,” he continued, adding that “Both the Executive and the Judiciary have an obligation to follow the law.”

The court had intervened after the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a request for intervention, claiming that dozens of Venezuelan immigrants, currently numbering about 50, faced an imminent threat of deportation without the opportunity to contest their removal from the country. Law enforcement authorities have linked many of the potential deportees, currently held at the Northern District of Texas’ Bluebonnet Detention Center, with the bloody Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua (TdA). 

Some had filed an Administrative Procedure Act (APA) complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia challenging their removal. Liberal federal Judge James Boasberg ruled in their favor and gave them a temporary restraining order (TRO) preventing their removal.

However, the Trump administration challenged the decision, arguing that it had given them advance notification, allowing them to challenge their detention and deportation by filing habeas claims. SCOTUS agreed with Trump and trashed Boasberg’s restraining order, paving the way for their eventual removal.

Their attorneys subsequently moved to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas and filed a habeas corpus for all Venezuelans pending deportation. However, Judge James Wesley Hendrix failed to grant them a TRO, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld the decision.

Subsequently, they requested the Supreme Court to intervene, which it did without allowing the Trump administration to defend itself. Nonetheless, it allowed the government to file a response after the ruling, which was no less scathing than Alito’s dissent.

“The government has agreed not to remove, pursuant the AEA, those AEA detainees who do file habeas claims (including the putative class representatives),” the admin stated. 

“This Court should dissolve its current administrative stay and allow the lower courts to address the relevant legal and factual questions in the first instance — including the development of a proper factual record.”

Democrats, Main Story

Steven Miller Slams AOC-Led Democratic Party Supporting “Criminal, Wife-Beating Terrorist Illegal Aliens”

/

United States Homeland Security Advisor Steven Miller has proven himself to be the biggest threat to the left’s propaganda since he started speaking to the media. He recently took a swipe at the supporters of violent illegal aliens, including terrorists and wife beaters.

Appearing on Fox News, he slammed the poorly rated Democratic Party that supports open borders, communism, and violence. Recently, the country was engulfed in Tesla vandalism, seemingly encouraged by some Democratic Party leaders.

“I think it’s just emblematic of the fact that the Democrat Party has been thoroughly, completely radicalized. They are an open borders party. They’re a communist party. They’re a party that excuses violence and left-wing terrorism. They are a party that’s polling at 21%,” Miller said on Hannity.

Miller warned that the Democratic Party’s popularity would continue to fall if it keeps fighting for illegal alien gang members from foreign countries, because most Americans wish to make the country safe. 

An Axios/Ipsos poll found that 66% of Americans support the deportation of illegal immigrants, explaining why many elected Trump, who had promised the biggest mass deportation in history. Another Pew Research Center poll found that 97% of Americans support removing violent illegal aliens, while 52% support removing those who have committed non-violent crimes. 

“But if they keep fighting to spring illegal alien gang members loose from foreign countries and bring them back to terrorize our families, that 21% will go down to 15% and 10% and lower and lower because Americans, above all else, expect their government to keep them safe. And Donald Trump is fighting harder to keep our families safer than anyone who has ever sat behind that resolute desk.”

Miller finally launched a more direct attack aimed at Democrats fighting to smuggle back a deported foreigner, who had entered the country illegally.

“We’ve reached a point in American politics where we have one party led by President Donald Trump that fights for Americans, and a second party, I guess led by AOC, that fights for illegal aliens, but not just illegal aliens. Criminal, wife-beating terrorist illegal aliens,” Miller added. “Two immigration judges, as you said, found that he was a member of MS-13, as did the arresting police department here nearby in Prince George’s County.”

Recently, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) also suggested that Democrats would retaliate against countries cooperating with Trump to deport “American citizens.” Tommy Vietor had allayed fears from the Latin American diplomatic community that Democrats would “take action against any foreign government that participates in the extraordinary rendition of American citizens.” 

Seemingly, that was Sen. Chris Van Hollen’s message when he visited El Salvador to free Kilmar Abrego Garcia from his home country and return him to the United States. Some Republicans have requested that Sen. Hollen be investigated for potentially violating the Logan Act, which prohibits unauthorized diplomacy.

“When we come back to power — and we will — are not going to look kindly upon people who facilitated authoritarianism in our country,” Raskin confirmed.

Undoubtedly, the Democratic Party does not respect our opinions on various matters, from allowing men in women’s sports, deporting violent criminals, to chemical and surgical gender transitions for minors. American voters should fight for democracy by ensuring that the party never returns to power until it learns to respect the will of the people.

crime

Minister Defends Metcalf’s Stabbing Suspect by Citing Kyle Rittenhouse, Misses Obvious Contradictions

/

Texas teen murder suspect Karmelo Anthony continues to receive an outpouring of support from the left, with many trying to make bolder statements to sway public opinion in what appears to be a relatively clear-cut case.

If you have been behind the news lately, the 17-year-old African American is accused of fatally stabbing unarmed Austin Metcalf, 17, in the chest during a track meet event after a brief confrontation at Kuykendall Stadium. It was alleged that Metcalf “grabbed” Anthony during the altercation when the suspect pulled the knife and stabbed him. Anthony faces first-degree murder charges related to the stabbing incident.

However, the left has continued to spin the case to fit the usual racial-bias stereotypes to sway public opinion and potentially influence its outcome. 

Recently, the suspect’s mother, Kayla Hays, decried the ongoing harassment and threats stemming from “false information” regarding the case.

“In the wake of this tragic incident, our family has been under attack. Whatever you think happened between Carmelo and the Metcalf boy — my three other children, my husband and I — didn’t do anything to deserve to be threatened, harassed, and lied about,” KWTX-TV reported.

“The lies and false accusations that have been said about us have been overwhelming, and the lies put our family in danger,” she added.

Others also rushed in to prop up her defense, including the activist Minister and the founder of a Dallas, Texas, social justice nonprofit, Next Generation Action Network (NGAN), Dominique Alexander. 

Unlike others, Alexander went a step further to compare Anthony’s actions to those of a Kenosha, Wisconsin, teen, Kyle Rittenhouse, who justifiably defended himself when attacked by a mob of Black Lives Matter (BLM) rioters who attempted to take his gun and use it on him.

The minister even accused Rittenhouse of “shooting people in the back,” which totally contradicts the facts of the case. While Alexander wants to draw parallels between the two cases, he also missed glaring contradictions, as Rittenhouse tried his best to remove himself from the dangerous situation by fleeing, until he was cornered, attacked, and overpowered.

Similarly, despite suffering life-threatening injuries, Rittenhouse’s bail was set at $2 million, while Anthony’s was reduced to a pesky $250,000 to allow him to return home. Rittenhouse’s defense team even requested a lower bail of $750,000, while the prosecution sought to increase the initial amount by $200,000.

Ironically, the controversial minister demanded that Anthony should be “afforded the same rights that Kyle Rittenhouse had.” Similarly, the suspect’s mother demanded “the same rights under the law that everyone else is afforded.”

Meanwhile, Anthony’s GiveSendGo donation page has raised over $460,000, with many donors characterizing him as the real victim and Metcalf as deserving of it. 

Anthony’s family is currently facing backlash after spending thousands of dollars received for his defense on homes and cars. Additionally, the victim’s father was not invited to a press conference and was forcefully removed despite having forgiven the suspect.

Anthony has a GPA of 3.7 and was facing expulsion from Frisco Independent School District, while Metcalf’s father says he was a 4.0 GPA student and the football team’s MVP.

Illegal Immigration

Grabbed, Punched, Ripped off Her Shirt: New Evidence on MS-13 Gang Member Deported to El Salvador

/

More details on the alleged MS-13 gang member deported to a hellhole prison in El Salvador, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who the Democrats fondly refer to as the “Maryland father,” have emerged.

It turns out that Garcia was not the model citizen and shining example of a family man as the Democrats would want you to believe. Garcia’s wife, Jennifer Vasquez, whom he married in 2019 while still waiting for his deportation proceedings, has requested two protective orders against him for alleged domestic abuse.

The first order was allegedly taken in 2020, closely followed by another in 2021, which was confirmed by the Department of Homeland Security.

“Kilmar Abrego Garcia had a history of violence and was not the upstanding “Maryland Man” the media has portrayed him as,” the DHS posted on X.

“According to court filings, Garcia’s wife sought a domestic violence restraining order against him, claiming he punched, scratched, and ripped off her shirt, among other harm.”

In 2021, the court granted the protective order directing Garcia to vacate his wife’s residence after determining that he had “punched and scratched” and “ripped off the shirt, grabbed, and bruised” her. 

The protective order also prohibited Garcia from entering the residence, contacting, or attempting to contact his wife. The alleged MS-13 gang member was also prohibited from contacting his wife’s mother or entering her residence.

In December 2022, Garcia was also stopped by the Tennessee Highway Patrol (THP) while transporting seven individuals from Texas to Maryland in a car without a valid driver’s license. According to The Tennessee Star, an officer at the scene reported that the El Salvador native was involved in human trafficking. 

The outlet cited two sources disclosing that THP officers discovered that either Garcia or one of the individuals being transported was on the terror watch list. They contacted the FBI under former Director Christopher Wray and were instructed to take pictures of the eight individuals.

“Once the photographs were captured, this source told The Star that the FBI requested THP release all eight individuals and that the THP officers complied with this request,” the Tennessee Star reported.

Meanwhile, as Democrats continue to push for Garcia’s return to the U.S., El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele has ruled out smuggling him back to the country.

“I don’t have the power to return him to the United States. How could I smuggle a terrorist into the United States? Of course, I’m not going to do it. The question is preposterous,” President Buleke said.

Additionally, Democrats’ trip to El Salvador to show solidarity with the alleged MS-13 gang member ended in a disaster after they were denied access to the high-security prison. The trip was clearly an insult to the people of El Salvador by politicians who seemingly believe they are above the laws of any country.

The group, led by Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen, had vowed to free the “Maryland Father,” illegally “kidnapped” and deported by the Trump administration.

Nonetheless, Garcia’s immigration status is not in dispute, as he was born in El Salvador and entered the United States illegally in 2011 at the age of 16.

In 2019, he was “arrested in the company of other ranking gang members,” and “evidence show[ed] that [Abrego Garcia] is a verified member of MS-13,” according to a DHS filing.

A judge granted him a “withholding of removal” order, stating that he could not be deported to El Salvador for safety concerns due to alleged gang threats, but suggesting that he could be deported to a safe third country. 

Since then, El Salvador has become one of the most peaceful countries in the Western Hemisphere, after President Nayib Bukele cleared all the gangs from the streets.

National Affairs

Sitting on $53 Billion: Scott Jennings Deconstructs Democrats Opposing Harvard Funding Freeze

/

CNN’s Scott Jennings slammed Democrats defending Harvard University after President Trump threatened to withhold billions of dollars in federal funding.  He pointed out how disturbing it would be for Americans to realize they’re funding an elite university with an endowment rivaling the budget of a small country.

“I think, as a political matter, if you went out to the American people right now and said ‘well, we’re just not gonna make it as a country unless we give $9 billion to Harvard, it’s sitting on $53 billion.’ You’d get your ass kicked, I imagine, in a political campaign,”

Jennings added that while these universities “do important work,” there was no justification to keep funding institutions that disregard the will of the American people.

“… I don’t agree that we need to continue to fund people who don’t listen to us when we say ‘you have problems.’”

“I would argue that it’s a national security problem that these Ivy League colleges are turning out people who fundamentally hate Western civilization. So there are points to be made here, and they need to listen.”

It is unacceptable that Americans should continue funding these liberal universities that continue to advance an anti-American agenda. 

Trump had requested Harvard to end its diversity, equity, and inclusion policies and take action against anti-semitic protesters. However, the university refused to comply, forcing the administration to cut $2.2 billion of the $9 billion in federal funding and $60 million worth of contracts. 

Trump, who described the university as a “joke,” has also threatened to revoke the university’s tax-exempt status, which seems reasonable move for an institution that charges over $50,000 per year in tuition.

Meanwhile, the US Department of Education, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the General Services Administration wrote a joint letter accusing the oldest and wealthiest university of failing to live up to its expectations.

“Harvard has in recent years failed to live up to both the intellectual and civil rights conditions that justify federal investment.”

They requested that the university take several actions to correct the situation, including ending DEI hiring and admission practices by August 2025.

The demand letter also requested Harvard to reform its admission criteria to “prevent admitting students hostile to the American values and institutions inscribed in the U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence, including students supportive of terrorism or anti-Semitism.”

No matter how Democrats try to spin it, those demands were reasonable for any institution that truly respects and upholds American values and intends to benefit from the same for the foreseeable future. 

Nonetheless, Harvard is seemingly unwilling to comply with those demands, which it termed as “an attempt to control the Harvard community.” 

“The administration’s prescription goes beyond the power of the federal government. It violates Harvard’s First Amendment rights and exceeds the statutory limits of the government’s authority under Title VI. And it threatens our values as a private institution devoted to the pursuit, production, and dissemination of knowledge.”

Ironically, Harvard may have justified the federal funding freeze by emphasizing its status as a “private institution.”

Illegal Immigration

Piers Morgan Deconstructs the Left over Alleged Pro-Hamas Organizer Mahmoud Khalil’s Deportation

/

Talk Show host Piers Morgan demolished the radical left by calling them out over their hypocrisy in defending the alleged pro-Hamas organizer fighting deportation.

Mahmoud Khalil is accused of helping pro-Hamas agitators at Columbia University and Barnard College campuses in the aftermath of the October 7, 2023, terrorist attacks. He currently holds a green card, but an immigration judge recently ruled that he could be removed from the country. Khalil’s lawyer says he will appeal, and the individual has until April 23 to apply for asylum. 

Appearing on Bill Maher’s “Real Time” program, Morgan pointed out that the left would have responded differently if a white individual had organized pro–white supremacy protests in the same manner as the alleged pro-Hamas activist.

“All right, what if I was a young student at Columbia, there on a green card, British, come in, happy to be here, doing my paperwork, get to Columbia, and I start leading a group which is a bunch of white supremacists, and we start terrorizing black students in the way that they are terrorizing Jewish students,” he stated.

“In that circumstance, would we all be as comfortable with this? Or is it the reality, which was exposed by the mobs at Columbia, which is that for some reason, Jews get treated differently to anybody else when it comes to this kind of thing?”

According to Morgan, if a white immigrant had targeted Black students in the same way pro-Hamas agitators allegedly organized by Khalil were targeting Jewish students, they would be removed almost immediately, and the Left would not raise eyebrows.

Similarly, Morgan pointed out that if the pro-Hamas activist had openly expressed his radical views during his green card interview, his request likely would have been denied.

“What about if he had said all of this at his green card interview? Would he have got a green card? No. If he said, ‘I support a prescribed terror group in the United States,’ you’re not coming in on a green card,” Morgan asked.

“But the idea that he would have said, ‘I support Hamas. I support a global intifada. I support the destruction of Western civilization. Now give me a green card to come and live in America.’  F*** off!”

The alleged pro-Hamas sympathizer incident is hardly the first in which Democrats are showing their double standards. Recently, a group of Democrats said they plan to visit an alleged MS-13 gang member deported to El Salvador in a show of solidarity. Trump has designated MS-13 and Tren de Aragua as “foreign terrorist organizations.” 

“Kilmar [Abrego Garcia] was illegally ABDUCTED and deported by the Trump Admin. He must be brought home NOW.”

Yet, the same Democrats hardly join the grieving families of victims killed by illegal immigrants and violent gangs. Biden even apologized for calling the Laken Riley killer an “illegal” immigrant. Similarly, all but seven Senate Democrats voted against the Laken Riley Act, which aims to prevent more murders by illegal immigrants. 

Once again, Democrats prove that illegal immigrants, terrorist sympathizers, and criminals have more rights and are more desirable than law-abiding American citizens.

Illegal Immigration

INSANE: Gov. Newsom Blows Another $2.8 Billion to Save Free Healthcare for Illegal Immigrants

/

California Governor Gavin Newsom has spent $2.8 billion to bail out the state’s Medicaid program, Medi-Cal, which is overstretched by illegal immigrants. Last month, Newsom had requested another loan of $3.4 billion to cover the ailing program’s $6.2 billion deficit. 

The new funding will only cover medical expenses for 15 million beneficiaries, including 1.6 million illegal immigrants, until June. 

The number of illegal immigrants living in California is estimated to be about 3 million (2.6 million in 2022, according to DHS), suggesting that over half were receiving free healthcare.

Additionally, the cost of covering them has increased from the projected $6 billion to $8.4 billion for the fiscal year 2024–2025. However, the cost will fall slightly for the next fiscal year to $7.4. Trump’s deportations could also significantly reduce the cost. 

Newsom had previously boasted that the deep blue state could provide healthcare for everyone regardless of their immigration status due to certain cost-cutting budget reconciliation measures and strategic investment. 

“With these new investments, California will become the first state to achieve universal access to health care coverage,” he said.

“We’re investing California’s historic surplus to accomplish transformative changes we’ve long dreamed of — including this historic Medi-Cal expansion to ensure thousands of older undocumented Californians, many of whom have been serving on the front lines of the pandemic, can access critical health care services,” he added.

The program officially launched in January 2024, although the Golden State has been offering free healthcare for illegal immigrants up to 26 years of age since 2019. During its launch, Newsom lauded Medi-Cal as “a major milestone in the state’s progress toward universal health coverage.” 

However, the free coverage for illegal immigrants comes at a cost, as many Californians are forced to compete with noncitizens for the same resources, leading to poor coverage.

Subsequently, Californian Republican lawmakers have questioned the program’s sustainability and criticized state Democrats for prioritizing illegal immigrants over legal residents.

“Just now, Senate Democrats rubber-stamped another $3 BILLION for Newsom’s free healthcare for illegal immigrants—on top of the $9.5 billion already spent,” tweeted California Republican state Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones.

“Meanwhile, healthcare access is plummeting. Wait times are growing. Democrats have made their choice: legal residents come second. We must stop new enrollments of illegal immigrants and rein in this unsustainable program before it collapses entirely.”

Others, such as Assemblyman Carl DeMaio (R-75), have called for Gov. Newsom to be investigated for potential Medicaid fraud.

“AUDIT NEWSOM! I’ve officially requested an investigation into Gavin Newsom’s Medi-Cal scandal. He’s bankrupted the program by giving $10B in free healthcare to illegal immigrants—and there’s strong evidence he illegally tried to get federal Medicaid reimbursements.”

California has a $68 billion budget deficit, largely caused by a shortfall in revenue as many taxpayers continue to flee the state and are replaced by illegal immigrants. 

While the Golden State experienced net negative domestic migration (-239,575), its population increased slightly (+0.6), bolstered by international migration (+361,057), which includes illegal immigration. 

DEI Pushback

How Far They’ve Fallen: Hegseth Hits Back After Jeffries’ Extremist, Nazi, and Dumb Effing DEI Hires Comment

/

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has lashed back at House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries for calling him one of the “Dumb Effing indviduals” and “DEI hires.” The Democrat was ranting about the military banning certain books leaning toward the critical race theory (CRT), white guilt, and slavery. 

Various Trump executive orders aimed to end radical ideology from the military, including diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), and mandated the banishment of critical race theory content.

“By March 5, 2025, all Components must remove and archive DoD news articles, photos, and videos promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), including content related to critical race theory, gender ideology, and identity-based programs,” Hegseth said in a memo.

Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell also stated that “All service academies are fully committed to executing and implementing President Trump’s Executive Orders.”

Consequently, over 400 books were removed from the military, which angered Democrats, including Jeffries, prompting him to take to social media and accuse Hegseth for allegedly attempting to rewrite and “whitewash” “our history.”

“These DEI hires in the Trump Administration, like Pete Hegseth, the so-called Secretary of Defense — dumb effing individuals — continue to try to test our resolve and cancel our history,” he said. 

“The latest is a book ban at the Naval Academy that removes works, including those about slavery, the Civil Rights Movement and the Holocaust — at the same time, keeping books written by Adolf Hitler.”

He also accused “these extremists” for thinking that “racist Nazi ideology and white supremacy is okay” and vowed to continue fighting attempts ot “whitewash our history.” Jeffries also accused Trump officials of trying to cancel Harriet Tubman and the Tuskegee Airmen.

“We’re going to keep the pressure on until this book ban is reversed and Pete Hegseth is fired,” he warned.

Appearing on Fox News, Secretary of Defense Hegseth hit back at the unhinged Democrat for defending the radical racial discriminatory policy. Despite the Democrats’ antics, Hegseth also promised to remain focused on prioritizing the interests of the United States.

“That’s how far they have fallen. It’s astonishing, not surprising,” Hegseth told Fox News.

“Of course, they don’t like the fact that we’re ripping DEI out of the military and making it colorblind and merit-based.”

“If their whole strategy is … to call us names while we secure the southern border, kick out Chinese influence, revive the warrior culture inside our military, that’s why they lost in a historic fashion to President Trump last time, and their future looks bleak as well.”

Ironically, Jeffries dismissed Hegseth as a DEI hire, underscoring his lack of respect for individuals hired through the program, accidentally saying the quiet part out loud. Yet, he still advocates for the military to continue the policy, demonstrating how detached from reason the Democrats are. 

He also seemed to fight against anti-Semitism when Democrats have been fighting the Trump administration for attempting to remove individuals involved in anti-semitic activities from the United States.

While Jeffries claims that some Holocaust books were removed, there were reports of “hostile compliance,” where some radical left federal employees “accidentally” removed materials that were not supposed to be removed to disgrace the Trump administration.

DEI

Consumer Watchdog: Major Companies Renaming DEI Programs While Maintaining Core Practices

/

A conservative consumer watchdog has blown the lid off many companies’ deceptive practices to conceal diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs they either announced to end or seemed to have paused. 

According to Consumers’ Research (CR), these companies, including Kohl’s, Dollar Tree, Disney, UPS, and Nationwide, have rebranded their woke programs likely to deceive unsuspecting users.

“Recently, companies have stated they are scrapping their DEI programs and policies, but for some companies, this declaration is merely a PR stunt. Instead of doing away with these illegal and discriminatory policies, these five companies are just rebranding their woke policies by calling DEI by a new name: ‘belonging,'” CR warned.

Shortly after Trump signed the “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity” executive action to end DEI in federal government and encouraged other companies to follow suit, Kohl changed the title of its DEI program to “inclusion and belonging” and expanded its scope to include small businesses. However, it still aims to become a “welcoming, respectful, and inclusive company,” suggesting that DEI is still a priority.

Dollar Tree also changed the name from “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” to “Culture of Belonging” but still maintained the “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Executive Council.” Nationwide also changed its DEI page to “Belonging, Respect and Fairness”, while UPS called it “Inclusion and Belonging.”

However, Consumers’ Research says these name changes were likely an attempt to hoodwink Americans that they had given up on the racially discriminative practices. The watchdog warns that the word “belonging” is a metaphor for DEI.

“It’s the same racism under a different name,” Consumers’ Research Executive Director Will Hild told Fox News Digital.

“Rebranding from DEI doesn’t change the anti-White and anti-Asian nature of these activities. Corporations should focus on serving customers by finding and retaining the best talent, not engaging in a retrograde racial patronage scheme.”

Many other companies rebranded their DEI programs to more subtle and palatable language without changing actual policies. Other names used by various companies to conceal DEI programs include “Responsible Innovation,” “Inclusive Culture,” “Equity and Belonging,” “inclusive leadership,” “employee resource groups (ERGs),” and “culture of care and connection.” 

Besides the five companies that CR highlighted, other likely culprits include JPMorgan, which renamed its DEI to “diversity, opportunity, and inclusion (DOI),” while Citi rebranded the program to “Talent Management and Engagement.” 

Banks have historically encouraged racially discriminative practices, such as enforcing the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, which usually include an element of racial equity, for a favorable credit rating. The SDGs made DEI an industry standard. They could also prevent many companies from ditching the practice for fear of losing their favorable credit rating.

Meanwhile, these companies will continue to purport ditching DEI likely to avoid potential investigations as the Trump’s executive order tasked federal organizations to “identify up to nine potential civil compliance investigations of publicly traded corporations, large non-profit corporations or associations, foundations with assets of $500 million or more, state and local bar and medical associations, and institutions of higher education with endowments over $1 billion.”

Besides private and public companies, some federal agencies have also attempted to conceal DEI practices through subtle wording. In January 2025, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) was exposed for trying to rename Lisa T. Boykin’s job title from “Chief Diversity Officer” to just “Senior Executive.”

The apparent attempt to disguise DEI prompted the White House to direct federal workers to report “any efforts to disguise these programs by using coded or imprecise language.”

The U.S. Military Academy at West Point also renamed the “Equal Opportunity and Diversity Management Branch” to “Opportunity, Diversity, and Inclusion Branch.” 

Besides the subtle name change, which does not suggest any significant changes, the academy’s objective remains to maintain “an equitable, inclusive, and effective organization.” 

Subsequently, conservative advocacy group Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to cast light on a potential attempt to conceal ongoing DEI practices.

“It seems games are afoot at West Point to disguise its radical DEI agenda,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.


Subscribe Form

© 2025 WokeSpy All Rights Reserved

Scroll to Top