Author name: Martin Tribe

Uncategorized

Maine Rep. Laurel Libby Celebrates SCOTUS Win After Censure for Opposing Trans Athletes in Girls’ Sports

/

Maine State Representative Laurel Libby is taking a victory lap after a landmark ruling restored her voting rights stripped by the Democratic majority for speaking out against boys in girls’ sports.

Rep. Libby had posted pictures of a transgender athlete participating in a girls’ pole vault competition in a viral social media post. She had highlighted that the transgender athlete had competed as a boy one year ago and clocked the fifth position. One year later, he competed as a girl and won the girls’ Maine State Class B Championship.

“We’ve learned that just *ONE* year ago John was competing in boys’ pole vault… that’s when he had his 5th place finish,” Libby posted on Facebook. “Tonight, ‘Katie’ won 1st place in the girls’ Maine State Class B Championship.”

However, Democrats claimed that Libby’s post violated the House code of conduct for identifying a minor and voted to censure her. On February 25, Maine House Speaker Ryan Fecteau turned off her voting device and blocked her from speaking after she refused to apologize. 

She escalated the legislative battle through the justice system by filing a lawsuit alleging the violation of her First and Fourteenth Amendment rights and disenfranchisement of her constituents. 

However, the lower courts denied her request to intervene, claiming “legislative immunity.” Subsequently, she escalated the challenge to the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking relief. The Trump administration supported her throughout the journey by filing an amicus brief.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court voted 7-2 in her favor, with female Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissenting.

“This is a victory not just for my constituents, but for the Constitution itself. The Supreme Court has affirmed what should never have been in question — that no state legislature has the power to silence an elected official simply for speaking truthfully about issues that matter,” Libby said in a statement.

Speaking to Riley Gaines, a former collegiate athlete defeated by a biological man, she recounted slamming the House Speaker for choosing the wrong side of history by silencing a woman fighting for girls’ rights.

“Speaker, you’re going to go down in history as a man who silenced a woman for speaking up for girls,” she said.

Meanwhile, her uncounted votes, including on the Maine Human Rights Act, which codifies the protection of biological men in women’s sports, will soon reflect. However, she still cannot speak on the House floor, awaiting the lower courts’ ruling. 

“Yesterday Speaker Ryan Fecteau was required to turn my voting device back on following the Supreme Court ruling,” she tweeted.

“I look forward to voting tomorrow, when we are back in session, on behalf of my 9,000 constituents, who have had their voices silenced for the last three months.”

Maine House Speaker Ryan Fecteau has promised to comply with the Supreme Court’s ruling and restore her voting rights. 

“In accordance with the Supreme Court’s injunction pending appeal, Representative Libby’s ability to vote on the floor of the House has been restored until the current appeal process runs its course,” the Maine House speaker told Fox News Digital.

Speaking to the same outlet, Libby slammed Democrats for using privacy rights as an excuse to censure her for opposing the participation of biological men in women’s sports. She noted that other lawmakers have previously posted photos of minors but faced no consequences, highlighting the Democratic Party’s double standards. 

Besides, school championships are public events, and players are usually identified. Before Libby posted about the transgender teen athlete, news of him winning the girls’ championship was making rounds on social media. Nonetheless, the Maine House speaker claimed that was no excuse for her to post a minor’s identifying information.

Uncategorized

“Big Problem”: Trump Sounds Alarm Over Someone Not Telling the Truth About Biden’s Cancer Diagnosis

/

Shortly after wishing the ailing Joe Biden a quick recovery, President Trump weighed in on the deepening controversy surrounding his cancer diagnosis. Hard to blame Trump since Biden insiders have for years strived to cover up his declining cognitive abilities.

“I’m surprised that — you know, the public wasn’t notified a long time ago because to get to stage nine, that’s a long time,” Trump said. “I just had my physical — We had the doctors at the White House and over at Walter Reed, which is a fantastic hospital. I did a very complete physical, including cognitive tests.”

Biden’s team said his cancer had a Gleason score of 9 out of 10 (Grade Group 5), indicating it was one of the most aggressive forms. It also had spread to the bone, thus categorized as Stage 4B.

Meanwhile, taking another jab at Biden, whose administration worked tirelessly to put him behind bars on trumped-up charges, Trump recommended cognitive tests, especially for Biden. “They say it’s unconstitutional. But I would say in that particular case, having a cognitive test wouldn’t be so bad,” he added.

The president also recommended asking the doctor why cognitive tests were not included in the exam, which would eliminate all doubts about his cognitive state. “I think somebody is going to have to speak to his doctor if it’s the same, or even if it’s two separate doctors,” Trump said. “Why wasn’t the cognitive ability, why wasn’t that discussed? And I think the doctor said he’s just fine. And it’s turned out that’s not so. It’s very dangerous.”

“Somebody is not telling the facts,” he added. “It’s a big problem.”

Recently, a former Obama official, Dr. Ezekiel Emmanuel, said there was no doubt that Biden’s cancer started much earlier than the last 100 or 200 days, probably at the start of his presidency. Besides Trump, others have also raised concerns about Biden’s cancer diagnosis and suggested legal consequences for people who likely knew about his condition.

Senior Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Leo Terrell has recommended prosecuting former First Lady Jill Biden for elder abuse. Terrell suggested that Jill had dragged weakened Biden into another blistering presidential campaign despite knowing his condition.

First son, Donald Trump Jr., also questioned the former First Lady’s role in the potential cover-up.

“What I want to know is how did Dr. Jill Biden miss stage five metastatic cancer or is this yet another coverup???” 

Donald Jr. was responding to an analysis by Dr. Steven Quay, explaining that prostate cancer takes between five and seven years to become metastatic.

“Meaning, it would be malpractice for this patient to show up and be first diagnosed with metastatic disease in May 2025,” the doctor argued.

“It is highly likely he was carrying a diagnosis of prostate cancer throughout his White House tenure and the American people were uninformed.”

Trump, former presidents George W. Bush, and Obama had all released their PSA checks, while Biden did not, suggesting a deliberate cover-up.

Meanwhile, others have questioned the timing of the cancer diagnosis, which was likely known to Biden’s confidants beforehand. Unsurprisingly, it coincided with the liberal journalist Jake Tapper aggressively promoting his book detailing Biden’s cognitive decline and subsequent cover-up, of which he was clearly involved.

Uncategorized

Blue State Woke Prosecutor Releases a Reckless Car-Racing Illegal Alien Killer on Community Service

/

A Democratic prosecutor has released an illegal immigrant teen involved in the fatal accident that killed a 24-year-old community volunteer on probation. The fifteen-year-old Colombian illegal immigrant will only serve two years of probation and 100 hours of community service after a plea deal offered by the woke prosecutor.

According to court documents, the illegal alien male teen, who has not been named due to privacy laws, was driving at 90 miles per hour in a residential area, twice the speed limit of 45 mph. 

He was racing his mother’s uninsured Jeep Cherokee when he T-boned Kaitlyn Weaver’s Volkswagen Jetta waiting at a stop sign, immediately killing her on the scene. 

However, progressive Arapahoe County District Attorney Amy Padden offered the illegal alien a plea deal in exchange for admission of guilt and a promise to attend school at American taxpayers’ cost, and not break any more laws. 

Padden was endorsed by the left’s heavyweights, including the former Democratic presidential primaries candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, the state’s Democratic Gov. Jared Polis, and Colorado U.S. Senators John Hickenlooper and Michael Bennet. She also shared photos with the failed Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris.

According to his mother, the speeding teen was supposed to be sent back to Colombia, but has since applied for asylum. 

Meanwhile, Kaitlyn was a model citizen, a psychology graduate who volunteered at a suicide hotline and later worked at a drug rehabilitation center.

Appearing on Fox News, Kaitlyn’s father described her as an “amazing human” who “spent her life trying to help people” but was taken at the prime of her life.

Nonetheless, Arapahoe County Assistant District Attorney Ryan Brackley condemned the reckless, unlawful behavior and said he believes the “negotiated sentence acknowledges the seriousness of this preventable tragedy.”

However, the prosecutor’s office deflected and blamed “speed” for the death of the 24-year-old social worker.

“We acknowledge Kaitlyn Weaver’s death was the direct result of a crash caused by an unlicensed teenager driving at nearly twice the posted speed limit,” it said in a Facebook post. “This tragic loss is a powerful reminder that it is not just alcohol or drug-impaired driving that takes lives. Driving at dangerous speeds has deadly consequences too, and they are felt by our entire community.”

However, Kaitlyn’s dad blamed the outcome on the collision between immigration laws and the criminal justice system, suggesting that the suspect’s immigration status might have played a role in the lenient sentence.

Progressives have seemingly shied away from sending illegal immigrants to prisons where ICE might pick them up and immediately deport them. 

However, releasing them onto the streets poses a challenge for ICE, as they may require necessary warrants and reasonable grounds to detain them before checking their immigration status. Recently, a County Circuit judge allegedly helped an illegal immigrant escape ICE by ushering him through a non-public door.

“We had a collision where the immigration system and the criminal justice system collided, and now my daughter’s dead,” Kaitlyn’s dad said.

Nonetheless, other teens responsible for deadly road crashes have received harsher sentences, such as 18-year-old Jesse Lloyd, who received 7 years for a vehicle rollover that resulted in a fatality.

However, blue states are notorious for handling illegal immigrants responsible for deadly road accidents with kid gloves. Recently, California released an illegal alien DUI killer, Oscar Eduardo Ortega-Anguiano, after serving just 3.5 years of his 10 sentence after killing two Americans. 

The habitual criminal with a lengthy rap sheet was driving at 100 miles per hour while under the influence of alcohol when he crashed into two 19-year-old American lovers.

Fortunately, the Trump administration intervened and slapped new charges on the illegal immigrant after his release, preventing him from returning to the streets where ICE might struggle to find him without the assistance of the sanctuary state, which usually refuses to cooperate.

Secretary of Defense Leon E. Panetta is interviewed by ABC's This Week host Jake Tapper at the Newseum Washington, D.C., May 25, 2012. (DoD photo by Petty Officer 1st Class Chad J. McNeeley/Released)
Media

More Lies: 10 Times Jake Tapper Helped Downplay Biden’s Decline

/

CNN media hack Jake Tapper is attempting to rewrite history by distancing himself from the left’s cover-up of Biden’s mental and physical decline. 

On Tuesday, he spent a considerable time promoting his book, which he promises readers will blow the lid off the multi-year conspiracy to hide Biden’s decline. 

Scott Jennings recently slammed liberal journalists trying to profit by exposing the lies they helped to propagate, for which Tapper takes the medal for being one of the most blatant. 

“And now all the books are coming out, and it’s amazing because a lot of the people who were telling those lies are now going to get paid to write those books. It’s crazy.”

Despite his attempts to portray himself as an innocent bystander, Americans have yet to forget iconic moments when he tried to convince us that Biden was fit for office. Here are ten times that Tapper helped downplay Biden’s decline.

Tapper’s ballistic interview with Lara Trump.

One of the most memorable moments when Tapper attempted to cover Biden’s decline was when he hosted Lara Trump close to the 2020 presidential election. During the interview, he grilled the First Daughter over her previous description of Biden struggling to get the words out. 

“I feel kind of sad for Joe Biden. I’m supposed to want him to fail at every turn, but every time he’s on stage and they turn to him I’m like, ‘Joe, can you get it out? Let’s get the words out, Joe.’” Lara had said.

“How do you think it makes little kids with stutters feel when they see you make a comment like that?” Tapper asked her.

However, Tapper went ballistic when Lara said she had no idea that Biden had a stutter and insisted that his incoherence was the result of mental decline.

“First and foremost, I had no idea that Joe Biden ever suffered from a stutter. I think what we see on stage with Joe Biden, Jake, is very clearly a cognitive decline,” Lara said.

“I think you have absolutely no standing to diagnose somebody’s cognitive decline,” Tapper lashed out. “I would think that somebody in the Trump family would be more sensitive to people who do not have medical licenses diagnosing politicians from afar.”

More stutter lies.

On March 21, 2024, during CNN’s The Lead, Tapper continued to push the false narrative and attack Donald Trump for mocking Biden’s cognitive decline.

“President Biden embraces his stutter, talking about it, while Trump mocks it, exaggerates it, belittles it.”

Trump had mocked Biden, saying, “Did you see him? He was stuttering through the whole thing.”

Biden is sharp mentally … physically, and Trump is only 3 years younger.

During CNN’s “Inside Look Into Joe Biden’s First Two Years As President,” Tapper insisted that the Democrat was sharp “mentally” before correcting himself and saying “physically.” 

He also attacked Trump, saying he was just a few years younger than Biden.

“He’s sharp mentally… physically? I think the question is physically, right, more so? And the guy who is his chief opponent is only three or four years younger than him,” Tapper said.

Former Dem Rep. Dean Phillips’ interview.

Tapper also questioned former Minnesota Democratic U.S. Rep. Dean Phillips over remarks he made about Biden suggesting that the then-president was unfit for office.

“Do you worry that you damaged him at all?” Tapper asked.

Tapper also accused Rep. Phillips of saying nasty things about other Democrats, thus suggesting that the former lawmaker’s alleged remarks about Biden’s decline were inaccurate and malicious.

Tapper: Biden’s decline false.

During another CNN segment, Tapper said the Wall Street Journal’s remarks “about President Biden’s mental fitness and acuity” were false.

“…false claims to the Wall Street Journal, about President Biden’s mental fitness and acuity…,” Tapper said.

Adam Schiff interview.

When hosting Russian Collusion propagandist Adam Schiff, Tapper said Biden was 81, but his memory was “not horrible.”

“He’s 81, and his memory, you know, it doesn’t seem great; it’s not horrible, but I don’t understand the outrage,” he said.

Blame Russia!

Typical of the left, Tapper attempted to blame Russia for spreading fake news about Biden’s cognitive decline.

“The Russians are trying to do to make us and the public not trust our election integrity. Joe Biden has dimension, all this stuff.”

More WSJ outrage.

Tapper claimed that the WSJ story was filled with problems and characterized concerns about Biden’s mental acuity as a talking point by conservative media.

“The Wall Street Journal is owned by News Corp, which is run by the Murdochs,” Tapper said, adding that those concerns were “mostly based on observations of Republicans.”

Not incapable of doing the job.

In March 2024, Tapper also attacked Republicans for questioning Biden’s mental condition and calling him weak and senile.

“He certainly seemed like an 81-year-old, but he didn’t seem incapable of doing the job,” Tapper said after Biden’s State of the Union address.

Meanwhile, Tapper’s team continues to deny his role in the cover-up, saying he always questioned Biden’s health.

“From the campaign in 2020 to 2024 when he dropped out, Jake raised concerns about President Biden’s mental stamina on his shows, questioned Biden officials directly about his health on air, and consistently encouraged open discussion and debate on the issue,” a CNN spokesperson said.

Illegal Immigration

“Entitled” Judge Dugan Accused of Obstruction for Aiding Illegal Alien, Seeks Dismissal on Odd Grounds

/

Suspended Milwaukee County Circuit Judge charged with aiding an illegal immigrant, Hannah Dugan, has filed a petition to dismiss her case, citing extraordinary circumstances. 

A grand jury recently indicted the county judge for concealing a person from arrest and obstruction of justice. If convicted of the two charges, she faces up to six years in prison or a fine of up to $350,000.

“This is no ordinary case, and Dugan is no ordinary criminal defendant,” the petition stated.

It also makes outrageous claims that the government’s prosecution of the Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge was “virtually unprecedented and entirely unconstitutional” and “violates the Tenth Amendment and fundamental principles of federalism.”

Additionally, it claims that Judge Dugan is “entitled to judicial immunity for her official acts.” However, after entering her plea, Dugan refused to answer questions about whether she had judicial immunity.

I am not an attorney, but I believe the alleged obstruction occurred outside her official duty as she was not presiding over a case challenging the suspect’s detention due to his immigration status.  

Seemingly, the judge should have waited for a case challenging his detention and set him free by ruling in his favor, instead of injecting herself into a matter that was not before the court. 

Similarly, the judge is not responsible for escorting defendants out of the court through a non-public entry. If it were, she could have just ordered it through an official ruling.

Additionally, Dugan is a county judge and not a federal judge, suggesting that she did not have the authority to stop the arrest of an illegal immigrant by federal authorities. 

Meanwhile, several experts have weighed in on Judge Dugan’s motion to dismiss the charges. At the very least, she must go through a trial to dismiss the charges. 

“You can certainly disagree with her motivations, but that’s not something that a judge can just assume without a trial. So my assumption is that the motion to dismiss today will be indeed turned down by the court,” tweeted George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley.

University of Wisconsin professor Howard Schweber also says that while judicial immunity exists for judicial rulings, it is nonexistent for administrative actions, such as who can be in the courtroom.

However, liberal NYT’s David Brooks said that while escorting a defendant through the jury door looks like “something illegal,” it could be heroic in times of civil disobedience.

Nonetheless, Republican Missouri Senator Josh Hawley said the judge was not above the law and should be prosecuted to the fullest.

“Let every other judge and member of Congress out there take a lesson from this. You are not above the law.”

On Thursday, Judge Dugan entered a “not guilty” plea on the same grounds, with her team asserting her innocence and determination to fight the charges. Her case was assigned to an 85-year-old Clinton-appointed U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman.

Meanwhile, leftwing protesters gathered outside the court during her arraignment, holding signs displaying various messages, such as “No Justice, No Peace,” “Stop Judicial Intimidation,” “STOP THE COUP,” “Intimidation is a tool of Fascism,” and “Show me what democracy looks like.”

Democrats

Rep. Jasmine Crockett Explains Surprising Reason Why Black Men Rejected Kamala Harris

/

Texas Democrat Jasmine Crockett has explained why Black men “did not vote” for former Vice President Kamala Harris. Rep. Crockett appeared on a podcast with former NBC’s Meet the Press host Chuck Todd, where she reflected on why Kamala performed worse among Black male voters than Biden in 2020.

While most Black men voted for Kamala during the election, President Trump gained popularity across all demographics, including African American males, subsequently performing better in predominantly Black cities of Philadelphia, Milwaukee, and Detroit than in 2020. 

However, Rep. Crockett believes Trump’s improved popularity among Black men boiled down to a single factor — misogyny.

“I definitely think that there was misogyny in this across the board, no matter what color male you’re talking about,” she stated. “I just think that you’d be in error to not, like, know that there was misogyny that existed.”

Democrats have often analyzed each candidate through the lens of identity to determine which traits they could exploit politically.  After Kamala’s magical transformation from Asian to Black, race became a less valid point when talking about Black men. Thus, Crockett opted for the low-hanging fruit instead — gender. 

Usually, Democrats would blame racism when other races, especially White voted against Kamala. For White men, it would obviously be attributed to both racism and misogyny.

However, Democrats had already prejudged Black men before elections as misogynistic. They subsequently spent a considerable amount of time and effort pressuring them to support Kamala, often implying that voting for someone else was sexist.

“Part of it makes me think that, well, you just aren’t feeling the idea of having a woman as president, and you’re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for that,” Obama told Black men during a Harris-Walz campaign.

Other leftists also echoed Obama’s comments about Black men being misogynistic if they fail to vote for the former Vice President.

“I believe President Obama is speaking to a tangible, visceral understanding of what it means for all men to relate to women in America,” said Khalil Thompson, the executive director and co-founder of Win With Black Men. “Calling out misogyny is not wrong.”

Meanwhile, Rep. Crockett also acknowledged that Kamala had a bad reputation with Black men while working as a federal prosecutor. 

“The very first polling briefing that we had, with a pollster that I trust a lot — he briefed the black caucus, and he said that one of the issues that he was running into with black and brown communities was that she had been a prosecutor,” Crockett claimed.

“There was definitely some resume stuff that disallowed her from being able to build the type of rapport of trust within these marginalized communities that historically have been targeted.”

Yet, how she and others concluded that misogyny was the primary reason Kamala lost support among some Black men remains unclear. Nonetheless, misogyny was leveled against all men across all minority races.

“It’s misogyny from Hispanic men, it’s misogyny from black men — things we’ve all been talking about — who do not want a woman leading them,” said “Morning Joe” host Joe Scarborough.

However, a CNN exit poll shows that the economy was among the top concerns for Black and Hispanic men, not gender and race, as Democrats would have you believe.

LGBTQ+

Female Colorado Capitol Staffers Intimidated After Bathroom Complaint Against Trans Aide

/

Colorado Capitol female staffers have raised concerns of potential retaliation after complaining about sharing bathrooms and other private spaces with a transgender individual. They had expressed their security concerns in a letter to House Speaker Julie McCluskie (D-CO) obtained by Fox News.

The female aides stated that the presence of the biological male “created an environment that feels increasingly hostile and unsafe,” making their workday distressing.

“The layout of this restroom – where stall doors obscure who is present and anyone could enter after you – heightens this concern, as there’s no way to know who is sharing the space,” the letter stated.
|
The affected women also told the outlet that the transgender individual was “stalking” and “threatening” them using body language.

However, concerns about potential intimidation and retaliation were raised during a protest against the radical gender ideology on the Capitol steps, attended by the mother of a girl transitioned into a boy without her consent, and Republican State Rep. Scott Bottoms.

Describing biological men’s presence in female bathrooms and other private spaces as sexual harassment, Rep. Bottoms denounced the radical gender ideology. 

“We have legislative aides who filed a complaint because men are in their bathrooms,” said State Rep. Bottoms. “I don’t care what the men call themselves, they are men biologically, and they’re in the bathrooms of women. This is sexual harassment, this is loss of freedom, loss of privacy…”

Rep. Bottoms explained that the aides were being intimidated using a confidentiality agreement that prevents them from speaking out or addressing the media. However, he noted that the confidentiality clause does not apply to the rest of the Democratic leadership, highlighting the party’s double standards. He also disclosed that lawyers were used to intimidate the aides to remain silent.

“They are being squished, being told to be quiet, sit down, shut up and know your place,” Rep. Bottoms said. “When did we go back to that? Women no longer have rights to this [privacy]?”

“We need to reclaim Colorado, … women, … their rights, … their privacy, … their integrity, and the respect that we used to have for women in this state. We don’t have it anymore.”

During the speech, Rep. Bottoms also slammed the proposed Colorado House Bill HB25-1312, which radical Democrats say intends to protect children and their parents from transgender-related discrimination.

Under the proposed legislation, “deadnaming and misgendering” transgender individuals would be classified as discrimination under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, putting parents, teachers, and schools at risk of lawsuits.

It also allows children to choose names other than those officially recognized and fill them in on official forms. It also forces schools to have gender gender-neutral dress codes and allows the state to overlook custody orders from other states if they allow one parent to withhold gender-affirming care.

According to Rep. Bottoms, ordinary Democrats do not support the transgender bill, which is being pushed by radical leftists and Marxist groups, but they are afraid of taking a stand.

Meanwhile, Douglas County Commissioners have passed a resolution against the proposed legislation, essentially becoming a sanctuary for potential victims of the proposed legislation.

“For us, here, remaining silent is no longer an option,” said Commissioner Kevin Van Winkle. “When government intrudes into the home and the family, where government has no business, it’s our duty as Commissioners to at least voice our opposition.”

Uncategorized

“No More Woke Handouts Based On Race!” — Trump Nukes Biden-Era $2.75 Billion Program for Minorities

/

President Trump drove a stake through the heart of another racist Biden policy that gave minorities $2.75 billion solely based on their race. Under a new Trump directive, the Biden-era Digital Equity Act will cease to exist.

The bill establishes “grant programs for promoting digital equity, supporting digital inclusion activities, and building capacity for state-led efforts to increase adoption of broadband by their residents.”

“The bill also establishes the Digital Equity Competitive Grant Program for supporting efforts to achieve digital equity, promote digital inclusion, and stimulate adoption of broadband.”

It dished out $2.75 billion to support various groups, including incarcerated individuals, disabled people, and non-English speakers, who are mostly illegal aliens. It also specifically targeted individuals in a “racial or ethnic minority group.”

“I have spoken with my wonderful Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, and we agree that the Biden/Harris so-called ‘Digital Equity Act’ is totally UNCONSTITUTIONAL,” Trump posted on Truth Social.

“No more woke handouts based on race! The Digital Equity Program is a RACIST and ILLEGAL $2.5 BILLION DOLLAR giveaway. I am ending this IMMEDIATELY, and saving Taxpayers BILLIONS OF DOLLARS!”

The program was part of the 2021 Biden administration’s $1 trillion infrastructure bill, H.R. 3684, also known as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, and included social spending and “clean energy” investments.

While the program committed over $42 billion to connecting everyone to “reliable, affordable high-speed internet,” not a single person had benefited from it by 2024.

“In 2021, the Biden Administration got $42.45 billion from Congress to deploy high-speed Internet to millions of Americans,” Brendan Carr, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chairman, posted on Twitter. “Years later, it has not connected even 1 person with those funds. In fact, it now says that no construction projects will even start until 2025 at earliest.”

It remains unclear how much of the $42 billion has been committed toward the racist program. However, Trump’s timely action to stop the project before construction begins could save American taxpayers a significant amount.

Meanwhile, critics, including the enraged left, took to social media to throw a tantrum after President Trump abruptly stopped their race-based slush fund.

Bangladeshi-born Virginia state Senator Saddam Azlan Salim said his state was already planning to use the funds under Governor Youngkin’s Digital Opportunity Plan. 

Massachusetts Democratic Senator Ed Markey also described Trump’s action as illegal and promised to fight back against it, likely because Democrats could easily get a restraining order from an activist judge.

“This illegal action will hurt our economy, our schools, our seniors, and our democracy. We will fight back against it,” posted Massachusetts Democratic Senator Ed Markey.

Ironically, leftists were not in a hurry to connect these “underserved communities” until Trump decided to hit the brakes on the program. While they argue that ending the program would widen the digital divide across the country, a more realistic approach could address the same problems without racial discrimination.

National Affairs

‘TRANS Is Out at the DOD’: Hegseth to Begin Purging Transgender Servicemembers in June

/

After winding court battles, actions, and rollbacks, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth will begin kicking out transgender servicemembers from the military next month, according to a recent memo.

“U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has issued internal instructions to the Pentagon to start kicking out transgender troops who do not elect to leave on their own by June 6, according to a memo obtained by Reuters,” the far-left outlet reported.

Active duty trans-identifying servicemembers have until June 6 to voluntarily identify themselves for “voluntary separation,” while those in the reserve have until July 7.

“On conclusion of the self-identification eligibility window, the Military Departments will initiate involuntary separation processes,” the memo stated.

“After a SCOTUS victory for @POTUS, TRANS is out at the DOD,” Hegseth also tweeted.

According to California-based think tank Palm Center, approximately 8,980 active duty and 5,727 reserve troops identify as transgender. While transgender servicemembers account for about 1% of the entire fighting force, the leftist ideology permeates across all levels of the military, forcing the majority to go an extra mile to accommodate the deluded minority.

Even non-trans servicemembers were forced to take training programs on fostering an inclusive environment for transgender servicemembers, while the core training content was also filled with transgender propaganda. 

Servicemembers were also forced to address their nonbinary colleagues using their preferred pronouns, which could easily lead to conflict due to accidental misgendering or personal belief in two biological genders based on sex assigned at birth.

Soldiers who used the wrong pronouns could also face disciplinary action, leading to administrative or judicial action under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), according to the Navy’s zero tolerance to harassment.

“Intentional misuse of transgender service member pronouns is inappropriate and inconsistent with the Navy zero tolerance policy on harassment,” U.S. Navy Capt. Dave Hecht told American Military News.

“Violations of regulation or law, to include failure to comply with the UCMJ [Uniform Code of Military Justice], may be punishable by administrative or judicial action.”

Meanwhile, the purge stems from President Trump’s “Restoring America’s Fighting Force” and “Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness” executive orders that directed the Secretary of Defense to update Medical Standards for Military Service Appointment, Enlistment, Induction, and Retention within 60 days.

Hegseth complied with the president’s directive by pausing the recruitment of “individuals with a history of gender dysphoria” and stopping planned/unplanned medical procedures related to gender transition for service members.

“Effective immediately, all new accessions for individuals with a history of gender dysphoria are paused, and all unscheduled, scheduled, or planned medical procedures associated with affirming or facilitating a gender transition for Service members are paused,” the memo stated.

However, Hegseth’s actions encountered significant setbacks after federal judges ordered a pause on hiring freezes and termination of members suffering from gender dysphoria. 

The first openly gay Uruguayan-born U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes and U.S. District Judge Benjamin Settle also ordered Hegseth to reinstate gender-affirming care and surgeries for transgender individuals.

On April 21, Hegseth complied with the orders and restored all “appropriate care for their diagnosis of [gender dysphoria], including mental health care and counseling and newly initiated or ongoing cross-sex hormone therapy.”

However, the Trump administration escalated the legal battle to the Supreme Court, which sided with the military, allowing Trump’s executive orders banning transgender service members to take effect.  

Three liberal justices, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented from the ruling, which pro-LGBTQ groups described as a “devastating blow to transgender servicemembers.” 

Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden speaks at the gala ceremony for the inaugural Library of Congress Lavine/Ken Burns Prize for Film, October 17, 2019. Photo by Shawn Miller/Library of Congress...Note: Privacy and publicity rights for individuals depicted may apply.
Democrats

You’re Fired! — Democrats’ Meltdown Over Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden’s Immediate Termination

/

President Trump fired the Obama-appointed Librarian of Congress, Carla Hayden, who was accused of being the left’s proxy and pushing gender identity on children.

On Thursday, May 8, Hayden received an email from the White House’s Presidential Personnel Office, stating that she had been terminated effective immediately.

“On behalf of President Donald J. Trump, I am writing to inform you that your position as the Librarian of Congress is terminated effective immediately. Thank you for your service,” reads the email.

Various conservative groups, including the American Accountability Foundation (AAF), had asked Trump to remove Hayden for being a proxy of the left in pushing decadent liberal policies such as gender identity for minors. AAF has also called for the removal of U.S. Copyright Office Director Shira Perlmutter, who works under the supervision of the Librarian of Congress.

Meanwhile, the Librarian of Congress holds significant influence in shaping policy and cultural preservation, positioning her as a powerful tool for advancing the radical left’s agenda, such as gender identity and critical race theory.

Watch:

Hayden also has a long history of association with the American Library Association (ALA), which she served as President between 2003 to 2004. ALA is accused of fighting against restricting child access to pornography in libraries and online. Hayden herself was also accused of misleading Congress on the issue.

Celebrated by the left as the first woman and Black person to hold the position, Hayden’s appointment had all the hallmarks of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). According to the AAF, she was also a Biden-Harris crony and a Top Clinton donor.

Celebrating the highly deserved victory, Tom Jones, the president of the AAF, praised President Trump for doing an “admirable and long-needed job cleaning out deep state liberals from the federal government.”

“It is time they show Carla Hayden and Shira Perlmutter the door and return an America First agenda to the nation’s intellectual property regulation,” added Jones.

However, enraged leftists slammed President Trump for removing their proxy and praised the outgoing Librarian of Congress for working with marginalized communities.

“While President Trump wants to ban books and tell Americans what to read – or not to read at all, Dr. Hayden has devoted her career to making reading and the pursuit of knowledge available to everyone,” said Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-NM) in an online statement.

Similarly, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries called Hayden’s termination “unjust” and accused Trump of banning books and attempting to “whitewash American history.”

“Donald Trump just fired my dear friend Dr. Carla Hayden—the Librarian of Congress—via email. This is disgraceful,” posted Massachusetts Democratic Senator Ed Markey.

“Trump’s outrageous, politically-motivated move to fire her is despicable,” said Maryland Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen, who led the campaign to bring back the alleged MS-13 gangbanger.

While Hayden’s ten-year tenure was due to end in 2026, her immediate removal was necessary to prevent her from entrenching the radical left’s policies at the eleventh hour, which would later prove too difficult to reverse.


Subscribe Form

© 2025 WokeSpy All Rights Reserved

Scroll to Top