Author name: Jason Walsh

Congress

16 Senate Democrats Vote Against Fentanyl Crackdown—Here Are Their Names

/
16 Senate Democrats Vote Against Fentanyl Crackdown—Here Are Their Names

The United States Senate has overwhelmingly passed the HALT Fentanyl Act (S.331), which designates fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I drugs under the Controlled Substances Act.

The legislation, sponsored by Senator Bill Cassidy (R-LA), was backed by 84 senators.

However, 16 Democrats inexplicably voted against the measure.

Their reason? Either blind partisanship or a preference for soft-on-crime policies—I’m leaning toward the latter.

Here is the full list of Democrats who opposed the final passage of the Halt Fentanyl Act:

  • Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD)
  • Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE)
  • Cory Booker (D-NJ)
  • Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)
  • Mazie Hirono (D-HI)
  • Ed Markey (D-MA)
  • Jeff Merkley (D-OR)
  • Chris Murphy (D-CT)
  • Alex Padilla (D-CA)
  • Bernie Sanders (D-VT)
  • Adam Schiff (D-CA)
  • Chris Van Hollen (D-MD)
  • Raphael Warnock (D-GA)
  • Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)
  • Peter Welch (D-VT)
  • Ron Wyden (D-OR)

The legislation now heads to the House of Representatives, where it is expected to pass with bipartisan support.

The National Pulse reports:

Sen. Cassidy’s legislation—now on its way to the House of Representatives, where it is expected to also pass with bipartisan support—upgrades punishments for so-called “fentanyl-related substances” and aligns them with the penalties applied to fentanyl analogues.

Notably, offenses involving 100 grams or more of fentanyl analogues carry a minimum sentence of 10 years in prison. The federal mandatory minimum sentence is likely the reason why most of the 16 Democrats opposed the bill—though the influence of Chinese agents cannot be discounted.

Chinese chemical and pharmaceutical companies illicitly export hundreds of kilograms of fentanyl precursor chemicals to the United States every month.

In February, several executives with Wuhan-based Hubei Aoks Bio-Tech Co. Ltd were indicted by U.S. federal prosecutors for illegally importing fentanyl precursors into the United States. In October of last year, eight Chinese companies and their employees were indicted for similar crimes in Florida.

Visit The Daily Fetched for more articles like this.

Economics

Trump Threatens 200% Tariffs Against “Hostile and Abusive” European Union

/
Trump Threatens 200% Tariffs Against 'Hostile and Abusive' European Union

President Donald Trump threatened the European Union (EU) with crushing tariffs if it does not lift “a nasty 50% Tariff on Whisky.”

The president, who described the EU as “one of the most hostile and abusive taxing and tariffing authorities in the World,” said he would place a 200% tariff if the globalist Union did not remove theirs.

“If this Tariff is not removed immediately, the U.S. will shortly place a 200% Tariff on all WINES, CHAMPAGNES, & ALCOHOLIC PRODUCTS COMING OUT OF FRANCE AND OTHER E.U. REPRESENTED COUNTRIES,” Trump warned.

The EU implemented tariffs on $28 billion worth of U.S. goods as a countermeasure to President Trump’s increased tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum imports. The EU targeted bourbon, jeans, and motorcycles, which appeared to be designed to harm globally popular American brands. However, tariffs on metal imports to the U.S. were not targeted at the EU but took effect globally, imposing a 25 percent levy on various metal items.

Tariffs in several areas have often been unbalanced in the EU’s favor. For example, the EU imposed 0 percent tariffs on American cars while the U.S. imposed only 2.5 percent tariffs on European cars.

The Hill reported:

A trade war with Europe was escalated Wednesday when Trump’s 25 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum took effect, leading the EU to swiftly retaliate with a two-step approach.

The European trading bloc, which is made up of 27 nations, said it will allow the suspension of existing 2018 and 2020 countermeasures against the U.S. to expire April 1. That would allow for 50 percent tariffs on American whiskey, which were suspended, to automatically go into effect.

Second, the commission is proposing a new package of countermeasures on goods coming from the U.S. that will go into effect in mid-April, covering some $28 billion in imports in total.

Chris Swonger, CEO of the Distilled Spirits Council, urged Trump to make a deal with the EU to prevent escalation.

“The U.S.-EU spirits sector is the model for fair and reciprocal trade, having zero-for-zero tariffs since 1997,” he said.

“We urge President Trump to secure a spirits agreement with the EU to get us back to zero-for-zero tariffs, which will create U.S. jobs and increase manufacturing and exports for the American hospitality sector. We want toasts not tariffs.”

On Wednesday, Swonger warned that a European whiskey tariff would be “very, very devastating.”

“We’ve just gotten the news early, early this morning, that the [EU] is poised to put a 50 percent tariff on American whiskey,” Swonger told NewsNation’s Nichole Berlie.

“That will be very, very devastating.”

Visit The Daily Fetched for more articles like this.

Govt Corruption

Senior USAID Official Orders Document Destruction, White House Responds

/
Senior USAID Official Orders Document Destruction, White House Responds

The White House has responded to an email from a senior USAID official ordering staffers to destroy documents at the Ronald Reagan Building on Tuesday.

The building is currently being cleared out as thousands of USAID workers have been placed on administrative leave.

In a motion filed in Washington, D.C., federal court, the unions cited an email from USAID’s acting executive director, Erica Carr, which stated:

“Shred as many documents first, and reserve the burn bags for when the shredder becomes unavailable or needs a break.

The only labeling required on the burn bags are the words ‘SECRET’ and ‘USAID/(B/IO)’ in dark sharpie if possible.”

White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly responded by saying it was “more fake news hysteria.”

“The USAID building will soon be occupied by CBP,” Kelly said.

“This was sent to roughly three dozen employees. The documents involved were old, mostly courtesy content (content from other agencies), and the originals still exist on classified computer systems,” she added.

“More fake news hysteria!”

The lawsuit was brought by the American Federation of Government Employees and the American Foreign Service Association, alleging that Trump overstepped his authority by largely shuttering an independent agency established by Congress by firing employees.

On Tuesday, the plaintiffs asked U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols for a temporary restraining order to block the shredding of the documents.

They argued that the loss of vital personnel or other records could prevent USAID from resuming its operations.

The judge responded by ordering both sides to submit a status report by Wednesday morning proposing a schedule for briefs on the motion.

Nichols allowed the Trump administration to proceed with its plan to put more than 2,000 USAID employees on leave.

The Trump administration has scrapped more than 80% of USAID’s programs and fired much of its staff.

In a separate lawsuit, a federal judge ruled that the Trump administration cannot refuse to spend foreign aid money appropriated by Congress, stopping short of restoring canceled contracts.

Visit The Daily Fetched for more articles like this.

Govt Corruption

Tucker Carlson Exposes RINO Senator Working to Block JFK Files Release

/
Tucker Carlson Exposes RINO Senator Working to Block JFK Files Release

Tucker Carlson has claimed a Republican U.S. senator has been secretly working to thwart the release of the highly anticipated files on President John F. Kennedy’s assassination.

Carlson said the individual pressured those within the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence to reject the nomination of another person by President Donald Trump to join his national intelligence team.

The nominee previously pushed for a full, unredacted release of the JFK files, which Carlson said was the reason behind the senator’s moves.

“You have a sitting member of the United States Senate whose main goal is to keep those files secret, and then you have to ask yourself, what is that?” Carlson told former CNN anchor Chris Cuomo during his show.

While nobody alive could be implicated in the assassination cover-up of Kennedy, Carlson said he knew who may have been attempting to do so, naming Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) of Arkansas.

“If you’re telling me that, six weeks ago, a sitting senator was attempting to keep someone out of a job to keep these files secret to protect ‘the CIA,’ I don’t believe that for a second,” Carlson declared.

Cuomo asked Carlson why he had not called Trump and asked what motivation Sen. Cotton may have for blocking his nominee.

“I haven’t. I haven’t asked,” Carlson said.

“I’d like to… I’m not sure he’ll sit down and do an interview with me.”

Watch:

Cotton fired back at Carlson, saying he “knows how to reach me” and hasn’t followed up to ask him about the secondhand story.

“This is false. I have no problem releasing the ‘JFK files.’ Had @tuckercarlson asked me, I would’ve told him,” Cotton wrote on X.

“He has texted me multiple times in recent weeks, so he knows how to reach me.”

He continued:

“I would’ve explained that I’ve never spoken to President Trump or his associates or administration officials about the files, never objected to the appointment of any person because of the files, and have complete faith that Tulsi Gabbard, John Ratcliffe, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, and other officials will release the files as appropriate in accordance with President Trump’s directive.”

However, Cotton recently objected to President Trump’s decision to revoke security details for several officials from his administration, including:

  • Former National Security Advisor John Bolton
  • Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and his top aide Brian Hook

Cotton said Trump’s decision could have a major effect on who in the intelligence community agrees to work with him in his second administration.

“It’s also about the president being able to get good people and get good advice,” Cotton said.

“They might hesitate to do so, or they might hesitate if they’re in office to give him the advice he needs to carry out the policies that he decides upon.”

Visit Daily Fetched for more articles like this.

Congress

Democrat Hypocrisy: Records Show AOC Spent Thousands in Taxpayer Money on Lavish Parties, Dance Lessons

/
    Democrat Hypocrisy: Records show AOC Spent Thousands in Taxpayer Money on Lavish Parties, Dance Lessons

    According to her expenses, Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has been charging the American taxpayer thousands of dollars for dance lessons and lavish parties at Mexican restaurants.

    X account, Paul A. Syzpula, posted AOC’s expenses, showing she spent $850 on “training” from a dance company and $3,384 at a Mexican restaurant in Virginia.

    Between October and December 2024, AOC also had at least 22 people working at a cost of nearly half a million dollars, all footed by the taxpayer.

    That’s not all.

    At least one of AOC’s employees was residing in the U.S. illegally.

    Syzpula also looked at Rep. Jasmine Crockett’s records, which showed a bill for her car lease at the cost of nearly $1,000 a month, meaning she owns three luxury cars.

    Of course, we all know that what the Democrats say and what they actually do are two very different things.

    Another example of the Democrats’ vulgar display of entitlement is California Rep. Eric Swalwell, who was busted last year for charging taxpayers for his childcare costs, fancy meals out at Four Seasons steakhouses, and even a stay at the Burj-Al-Arab, the world’s only “Seven Star” hotel located in Dubai.

    While these expenses are just the tip of the iceberg, it’s important to not that the real issue is leftist NGOs enjoying billions from the taxpayer—most notably with George Soros‘ organizations, which received a staggering $260 million from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)—it’s no surprise the U.S. was on the verge of bankruptcy.

    Visit Daily Fetched to read more articles like this.

    Democrats

    Trump Admin Roasts AOC and Other Dems over Cringe “Choose Your Fighter” Video

    /
    Trump Admin Roasts AOC and Other Dems over Cringe "Choose Your Fighter" Video

    Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and other Democratic congresswomen appeared in an anti-Trump “Choose Your Fighter” TikTok clip that went viral for all the wrong reasons.

    The video, initially posted by cookbook author and influencer Sulhee Jessica Woo, was immediately roasted by users on X.

    Watch:

    The Trump administration didn’t waste time trolling the congresswomen with their own White House montage, which showed President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and other members of the Republican administration with the caption “America Chose Its Fighters Last November.”

    The clip featured Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on horseback and border czar Tom Homan walking away from a helicopter.

    Also appearing in the video were Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, FBI Director Kash Patel, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.

    Watch:

    Meanwhile, the Democratic House members’ video, which included Ocasio-Cortez, Rep. Lauren Underwood of Illinois, Rep. Katherine Clark of Massachusetts, Rep. Judy Chu of California, Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, and Rep. Susie Lee of Nevada, was widely mocked on social media.

    AOC, who appeared in the clip, said “She is a Trekkie,” while Clark, 61, said she doesn’t like hair dye.

    Crockett, 43, disclosed she’s not a morning person, while Underwood, 38, insisted she doesn’t like balloons.

    Unsurprisingly, the clip failed to hit the mark.

    “Democrats Not Be Cringe Challenge,” the Trump administration’s Rapid Response account wrote on X. “Level: Impossible.”

    “The problem isn’t policy failures, economic anxiety, or a general sense that everything is coming apart at the seams,” political writer Matt Lewis wrote.

    “No, no — the real issue is that voters just don’t know how much fun their representatives are!”

    Punchbowl News reporter Ben Brody called it “hilariously cringey.”

    “One of the worst parts about this: the Choose Your Fighter trend was popular on TikTok like 3 years ago,” journalist Peter Hamby wrote.

    For more articles like this, visit Daily Fetched

    Democrats

    Trump Slams Al Green: “He Should Be Forced to Take an IQ Test”

    /
      Trump Slams Al Green: "He Should Be Forced to Take an IQ Test"

      President Donald Trump said that unhinged Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, “should be forced to pass an IQ test because he is a low IQ individual and we don’t need low IQ individuals in Congress,” following his disruptive stunt during the President’s joint session address.

      “He should be censured,” Trump told Fox News.

      “He should be forced to pass an IQ test because he is a low IQ individual and we don’t need low IQ individuals in Congress.”

      Trump described Green as “a fool and a clown.”

      “Nobody takes him seriously,” Trump said.

      “He is an embarrassment to Congress but a much bigger embarrassment to the Democrats.”

      The House of Representatives censured Green for interrupting Tuesday’s joint session address to Congress.

      “Al Green’s childish outburst exposed the chaos and dysfunction within the Democrat party since President Trump’s overwhelming win in November and his success in office thus far. It is not surprising 198 Democrats refused to support Green’s censure given their history of radical, inflammatory rhetoric fueled by Trump Derangement Syndrome,” House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, R-Minn., said.

      The Democrat was removed from Trump’s joint address to Congress after repeatedly disrupting the President’s speech.

      As Trump touted Republican victories in the House, Senate, and White House, Green shouted, “You have no mandate!”

      The U.S. Sergeant-at-Arms later removed Green.

      Other Democrats engaged in silent and vocal acts of protest against Trump, including refusing to stand or clap when Trump designated a 13-year-old boy an honorary Secret Service agent.

      The House speaker publicly challenged Democrats to vote with Republicans in favor of the censure.

      “Despite my repeated warnings, he refused to cease his antics, and I was forced to remove him from the chamber,” Johnson posted on X.

      “He deliberately violated House rules, and an expeditious vote of censure is an appropriate remedy. Any Democrat who is concerned about regaining the trust and respect of the American people should join House Republicans in this effort.”

      Visit Daily Fetched for more articles like this.

      Big Government

      Adam Schiff’s Ukraine Connection Under Fire as Ciaramella Resurfaces

      /
      Adam Schiff's Ukraine Connection Under Fire as Ciaramella Resurfaces

      CIA analyst and former National Security Council official Eric Ciaramella, the “whistleblower” connected to President Donald Trump’s 2019 impeachment, is back in the spotlight regarding Adam Schiff‘s connection to Ukraine.

      Former Ukrainian diplomat Andrei Telashchenko alleged that he was present when Ciaramella met with then-President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden while they discussed Ukraine behind closed doors.

      Telashchenko’s claims raise new concerns about Ciaramella’s role in U.S.-Ukraine relations during Obama’s presidency, notably with policies that became a key factor in the first impeachment of President Donald Trump.

      Ciaramella was identified as the anonymous whistleblower during Trump’s impeachment inquiry after famously filing a complaint about Trump’s “perfect” phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The complaint was ultimately used to launch an impeachment vote in the House, led by then-chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff.

      President Trump has long accused Schiff of lying and manipulating intelligence in order to push narratives that weaponized the government against him.

      FBI Director Kash Patel, who played a crucial role in exposing the Trump “Russia Russia Russia” collusion hoax, is now digging deep into Schiff’s involvement. Patel said he has “strong feelings” about Schiff’s actions and probable ties to Ciaramella’s role in Ukraine-related controversies.

      The sudden resurfacing of Ciaramella’s name into the spotlight has now reignited debate over the integrity of the 2019 impeachment proceedings against Trump.

      Elon Musk responded to the revelations on X, writing:

      “Did Adam Schiff commit treason? Sounds like he did.”

      Watch:

      More here:

      WLT writer, Noah, asked Grok to analyze what Schiff may have allegedly done, and whether it could amount to treason, here’s what it said:

      To construct the strongest argument supporting the claim that Adam Schiff committed treason, we must first define “treason” under U.S. law and then align the argument with available evidence and reasoning, while critically assessing the narrative. Treason, as defined in Article III, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution, requires two elements: (1) levying war against the United States or adhering to its enemies, and (2) providing them aid and comfort. It also requires the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act or a confession in open court. The argument below is built on public statements, actions, and sentiment, particularly from critics, while acknowledging the legal threshold for treason is extraordinarily high and rarely met.

      Argument: Adam Schiff Committed Treason by Fabricating Evidence to Undermine a Sitting President

      Adam Schiff, as a prominent Democratic Representative and later Senator, is accused by critics of committing treason through his actions during the investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election and Donald Trump’s subsequent presidency. The core of the argument is that Schiff knowingly fabricated or exaggerated claims of evidence linking Trump to Russia, with the intent to destabilize a duly elected president, thereby aiding foreign adversaries and undermining the U.S. government.

      1. Claim of Fabricated Evidence: Critics assert that Schiff repeatedly claimed to possess concrete, classified evidence of Trump’s collusion with Russia to influence the 2016 election. For instance, during his tenure as the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Schiff stated on multiple occasions—such as in media appearances—that he had seen evidence of collusion that was more than circumstantial. However, when pressed to produce this evidence, particularly after the Mueller Report (released in April 2019) found no sufficient evidence to establish a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, Schiff allegedly failed to substantiate his claims. Posts on X and statements from Trump supporters highlight this, accusing him of lying about the Steele Dossier or other intelligence that was later debunked or unverified.
      2. Intent to Overthrow or Weaken the Government: The argument posits that Schiff’s actions were not mere political posturing but a deliberate attempt to overthrow or cripple Trump’s presidency. By promoting the “Russia collusion” narrative, Schiff is said to have led a campaign—supported by Democrats and media outlets—that amounted to a “coup” against a sitting president. Critics, including those on X, argue this was an act of sedition or treason because it sought to delegitimize the government’s executive branch, potentially inciting unrest or weakening U.S. leadership on the global stage. Trump himself amplified this view, calling Schiff’s actions “treason” and suggesting he should be arrested, as noted in posts and news reports from 2019 and beyond.
      3. Aid and Comfort to Enemies: The treason claim hinges on the idea that Schiff’s actions indirectly aided foreign enemies, particularly Russia. By amplifying a narrative of Russian interference without conclusive proof, he allegedly played into Russia’s hands—since sowing discord and distrust in U.S. institutions is a known tactic of foreign adversaries. If Schiff knowingly lied, the argument goes, he provided Russia with a propaganda victory, eroding American unity and credibility, thus giving “aid and comfort” to an enemy. This is a stretch legally but resonates with critics who see his actions as reckless or malicious.
      4. Public and Political Consequences: Schiff’s role in Trump’s first impeachment (2019-2020) over the Ukraine call—where he paraphrased Trump’s conversation in a way critics called a fabrication—further fuels the argument. Trump tweeted in September 2019, “Arrest for Treason?” about Schiff, claiming he misrepresented the call to Congress and the public. The House censured Schiff in June 2023 for his role in the Russia probe, with Republicans like Anna Paulina Luna accusing him of abusing his position. This censure, while symbolic, is cited as evidence of wrongdoing that aligns with the treason narrative.

      Supporting Evidence and Sentiment

      Statements and Actions: Schiff’s public assertions about Russian collusion, contrasted with the Mueller Report’s findings, are the backbone of the claim. His 2019 impeachment paraphrase of Trump’s Ukraine call, which he admitted was partly satirical but presented as serious, is seen as evidence of deceit.

      Trump’s Accusations: Trump’s repeated labeling of Schiff as a traitor, including in January 2025 remarks about the Jan. 6 committee, lends weight among his base. Trump called the entire committee’s work “TREASON” in a New York Times-reported statement.
      Public Sentiment on X: Posts from users like
      @CjmMccarth39414
      and
      @thewildbill59
      (March 2025) explicitly call Schiff’s actions treasonous, reflecting a belief that lying about evidence to undermine a president crosses a legal and moral line.

      Counterpoints and Weaknesses

      Legally, this argument struggles to meet the Constitution’s strict definition of treason. No evidence shows Schiff levied war or directly adhered to an enemy like Russia—his actions were political, not military. The “aid and comfort” claim is speculative, lacking two witnesses to an overt act. Critics might argue he was exercising his congressional role, however aggressively, not committing a crime. The Mueller Report’s inconclusive findings don’t prove Schiff lied knowingly; he could have been mistaken or overzealous. The censure reflects partisan disagreement, not a legal conviction.

      Conclusion

      The best argument for Schiff committing treason rests on the narrative that he knowingly fabricated evidence to destabilize Trump’s presidency, indirectly aiding Russia by amplifying division—acts framed as a betrayal of the nation. While compelling to his detractors, it falls short of legal treason without direct proof of intent and enemy collaboration. It thrives as a political accusation rather than a prosecutable case, rooted in the polarized lens of Trump-era conflicts.

      Visit Daily Fetched for more articles like this

      Govt Corruption

      Elon Musk Drops Bombshell on $12 Billion Swindle: “Only the Government Can Get Away With This”

      /
      Elon Musk Drops Bombshell on $12 Billion Swindle: "Only the Government Can Get Away With This"

      Elon Musk dropped a shocking revelation about how the government handed the Navy $12 billion to build new submarines, only to find that not a single submarine was built with the money.

      Musk, who revealed that he first heard the revelation from Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine), said Navy officials shrugged when asked where the money for the submarines went.

      “There’s a case where I think Senator Collins was telling me about how she gave the Navy $12 billion for more submarines, got no extra submarines, and then held a hearing to say where the $12 billion went,” Musk told Joe Rogan.

      “And they were like, we don’t know. That was it. I mean, basically, stuff is so crazy only the Federal Government could get away with this level of waste,” Musk added.

      Watch:

      The Tesla CEO noted how the government could save $100 billion a year just by forcing agencies to explain what their payments are for.

      Under the current system, the government can send payments with no categorization code, meaning they do not have to explain what it’s for—essentially handing out blank checks.

      Musk further explained that public companies would be immediately delisted, and their executives would “be thrown in prison” if they were to do the same thing.

      Watch

      Both Musk and Rogan then expressed outrage over how National Security Agency (NSA) staffers spent taxpayer time turning government servers into porn chat rooms.

      “Your tax dollars at work,” Musk mocked.

      “That’s not what they should be talking about at all. Supposed to be protecting the country.”

      Watch:

      Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard fired the NSA workers after it was discovered they engaged in explicit behavior on group chats.

      “This behavior is unacceptable and those involved WILL be held accountable,” Gabbard posted on X.

      Musk went on to slam the so-called “threat to democracy” slogan, describing it as a cover for a “threat to bureaucracy.”

      He also exposed the government’s use of taxpayer-funded NGOs as a loophole to funnel billions of dollars into shady organizations—doing things that would be illegal if the government did it themselves.

      Musk said that the term NGO is an “oxymoron” because the government funds these so-called nongovernmental organizations.

      “The whole NGO thing is a nightmare. And it’s a misnomer because if you have a government-funded nongovernmental organization, you’re simply a government-funded organization. It’s an oxymoron,” Musk explained.

      As we reported last week, a left-wing nongovernmental organization (NGO) received $17 million in U.S. taxpayer money to create a low-quality Muppets knock-off puppet show to “promote democracy.”

      The show was created by The United States Democracy Center, an NGO founded by an anti-Trump figure who played a key role in the President’s first impeachment.

      “They got money, and they did something with that. It was just awful. Jim Henson would roll in his grave. And it was weird because all the videos have less than 200 views,” DataRepublican, who exposed the scam, explained.

      “They didn’t even try to promote them with ads or anything. So where did the $17 million go?” she asked.

      Watch

      DataRepublican also exposed the “Uniparty” as a group of NGOs partially funded by the American taxpayer.

      Several NGOs, heavily backed by USAID and the U.S. State Department, act as the Uniparty’s enforcement arm, pushing propaganda under the guise of “protecting democracy,” according to her investigation.

      During the Cold War, the group shifted its mission from spreading democracy to consolidating its power under the guise of protecting democracy.

      Rogan asked Musk what he expected to uncover when he first launched DOGE.

      Musk replied, “I thought it would be bad, but I did not think it would be as bad as this.”

      Visit Daily Fetched to read more articles like this

      Big Government

      Luna Blasts Bondi Over Epstein Files: “I’m Not Confident” the Full List Will Ever Be Released

      /

        Chairwoman of the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), has thrown shade on Attorney General Pam Bondi’s release of the Jeffrey Epstein client list, arguing the previous setbacks have not instilled confidence in her.

        During an interview with Rep. Matt Gaetz on One America News Network (OANN), Luna echoed millions of frustrated conservatives who took to social media to vent anger over the heavily redacted Epstein file release last week.

        Just last month, Bondi claimed on Fox News she was “actively reviewing” the Epstein, JFK, and MLK files.

        Following the release of the files, Luna took to X, writing:

        “AG Pam Bondi, We saw over the weekend you are reviewing all files from JFK to Epstein! We are ALL anticipating their release! When will they be declassified and available to the public?”

        The conservative firebrand didn’t stop there and brutally doubled down in a follow-up post:

        “On Feb 11 & Feb 19, House Oversight sent a letter to the DOJ asking for status on releasing the Epstein files as well as JFK, etc. The DOJ has not responded. Reaching out on X because we can’t seem to get a response from the AG. AG Pam Bondi, what is the status of the documents? These documents were ordered to be declassified.”

        There was also backlash against the apparent media spectacle of selected conservative influencers who received a binder of phase one of the Epstein documents, with many calling it a media circus.

        Luna also vented frustration over the influencers receiving the binder before her committee. She again confronted Bondi over the disappointing release of the Epstein files.

        “I nor the task force were given or reviewed the Epstein documents being released today… A NY Post story just revealed that the documents will simply be Epstein’s phonebook,” said Luna.

        “THIS IS NOT WHAT WE OR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ASKED FOR and a complete disappointment. GET US THE INFORMATION WE ASKED FOR!”

        During her interview with Gaetz, Luna said she was not confident about the Epstein client list release.

        “Are you confident, as you sit here now, that there will be an Epstein client list that the American people will see?” Gaetz asked her.

        “I’m not confident on the Epstein client list because I haven’t had the briefing yet from the Department of Justice,” Luna responded.

        “I’ll know more tomorrow on that. But based on what I’m hearing from the attorney general, she keeps saying that she is going to release something, so I’m going to take her at her word for that,” she added.

        “Now, whether that something is a full list, we have asked for the full list. We have asked for all the documentation. We are pushing for maximum transparency. But again, we do not hold declassification authority. That is up to the attorney general.”

        Watch:

        Last week, Elon Musk defended Bondi after the disappointing Epstein release, writing on X:

        “People don’t understand that you don’t get instant power here.”

        As many conservatives expressed outrage after finding that no new information was included in the file, Musk again defended Bondi, writing,

        “Imagine if you were suddenly appointed AG or head of the FBI. You were just thrown on a ship with a hostile crew. Until you appoint some new crew members and figure out the ropes, you can’t steer the ship effectively. It’s literally impossible.”

        Not long after Bondi accused the FBI of lying to her about the documents, FBI Director Kash Patel also weighed in.

        “The FBI is entering a new era—one that will be defined by integrity, accountability, and the unwavering pursuit of justice,” Patel said.

        “There will be no cover-ups, no missing documents, and no stone left unturned — and anyone from the prior or current Bureau who undermines this will be swiftly pursued.”

        “If there are gaps, we will find them,” he continued.

        “If records have been hidden, we will uncover them. And we will bring everything we find to the DOJ to be fully assessed and transparently disseminated to the American people as it should be,” he added.

        “The oath we take is to the Constitution, and under my leadership, that promise will be upheld without compromise.”

        Visit the Daily Fetched for more articles like this


        Subscribe Form

        © 2025 WokeSpy All Rights Reserved

        Scroll to Top